...He lists some of Sc1ent0logy's selling points: its drug-abuse, prison-rehabilitation and education programs. "Some people, well, if they don't like Sc1ent0logy, well, then, fuck you." He rises from the table. "Really." He points an angry finger at the imaginary enemy. "Fuck you." His face reddens. "Period."
Whoa.
― Whoa (Kingfish), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 23:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 23:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 23:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lt. Kingfish Del Pickles (Kingfish), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 23:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 23:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lt. Kingfish Del Pickles (Kingfish), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 23:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 23:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sir Chaki McBeer III (chaki), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 23:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dirty Muriel (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 23:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sir Chaki McBeer III (chaki), Tuesday, 17 August 2004 23:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dirty Muriel (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 00:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 00:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 01:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― artdamages (artdamages), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 01:03 (twenty-one years ago)
Last year I spent a lot of time researching scientology on the web, and only found articles either extremely defensive of it or extremely against it. One site tried to take an objective stance, but in reality it had become a haven for ex-scientologists to decry the 'church'.
Just the fact that the 'church' tries to silence anyone who makes negative comments is enough to turn me against it. That, and Battlefield Earth.
― Dirty Muriel (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 01:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 01:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― l. ron gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 01:08 (twenty-one years ago)
READ THE ARTICLE folks, it's fucked up again
― Lt. Kingfish Del Pickles (Kingfish), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 01:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gearontologist (Gear!), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 01:13 (twenty-one years ago)
why do the celebrity scientologists never talk about THE SPACE ALIENS?!?!
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 03:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 03:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sir Chaki McBeer III (chaki), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 06:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― ENRQ, Wednesday, 18 August 2004 07:26 (twenty-one years ago)
Scientology was awarded tax exempt status and that pisses me off.
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 07:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― g--ff (gcannon), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 08:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― jewelly (jewelly), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 08:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 09:36 (twenty-one years ago)
-- amateur!!!st (|/...), August 18th, 2004.
i think i read somewhere that celebrity Scientologists are paid big $$$ to praise Scientology in interviews and such. Obviously the sc-fi/alien stuff isn't going to attract most people.
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 09:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 11:19 (twenty-one years ago)
or hell, Tom Cruise vs Tom Green. there's yer PPV event.
― Lt. Kingfish Del Pickles (Kingfish), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 14:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― sexyDancer, Wednesday, 18 August 2004 14:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)
What a card! What a cut-up! He slays me!
― Harold Media (kenan), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 14:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 14:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lt. Kingfish Del Pickles (Kingfish), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 14:35 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm trying to figure out whether it's good I've never heard of this person before or not.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 14:37 (twenty-one years ago)
also, ladies & Gentlemen, we overlook Mr Cruise's MANLINESS as displayed in such films as COCKTAIL.
which was GREAT until the flick actually went to the tropics.
― Lt. Kingfish Del Pickles (Kingfish), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 14:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 14:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st, Wednesday, 18 August 2004 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― g--ff (gcannon), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 16:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lt. Kingfish Del Pickles (Kingfish), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 16:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st, Wednesday, 18 August 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)
My understanding is that they are actually quite homophobic and very conservative in their 'family values' - they encourage marriage and discourage divorce. Of course, if you're a $camentology celeb, you aren't held to the same standard. Like most cults or authoritarian societies in general, really.
― Kerry (dymaxia), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 17:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sir Chaki McBeer III (chaki), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 18:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom Cruise, Friday, 22 October 2004 16:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Je4nn3 ƒur¥ (Je4nne Fury), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:15 (twenty years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:19 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:19 (twenty years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:20 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)
Their first celebrity recruit was Errol Flynn. If you are cool with Errol Flynn you don't care what people do with their privates in their spare time. Period.
One of the first things you have to do is be audited and share your sexual past with them. If I'm a celebrity with a checkered past and my church knows every detail about it you'd bet I'd be defending them to the death too.
― Cunga (Cunga), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)
Poor little Katie Holmes. If she tries to leave now, he'll eat her baby.
― pullapartgirl (pullapartgirl), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:24 (twenty years ago)
― Jimmy Mod wants you to tighten the strings on your corset (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:25 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:25 (twenty years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_and_Scientology
― huell howser (chaki), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:27 (twenty years ago)
― svend (svend), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:30 (twenty years ago)
― Jimmy Mod wants you to tighten the strings on your corset (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:33 (twenty years ago)
Britney Spears sex video
― teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:41 (twenty years ago)
Let's make millions!!!
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:43 (twenty years ago)
― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:45 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 19:53 (twenty years ago)
― Je4nn3 ƒur¥ (Je4nne Fury), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 20:05 (twenty years ago)
― nathalie, a bum like you (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 20:31 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 20:33 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 20:35 (twenty years ago)
― nathalie, a bum like you (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 20:36 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 20:45 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 20:46 (twenty years ago)
― nathalie, a bum like you (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 20:47 (twenty years ago)
great. mental images of rubbed red & chafing...
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 20:59 (twenty years ago)
they just had to tell me to stop laughing in the library im in...
― JD from CDepot, Wednesday, 5 October 2005 21:19 (twenty years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 22:52 (twenty years ago)
― amon (eman), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 23:47 (twenty years ago)
― amon (eman), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 23:48 (twenty years ago)
http://www.babybeing.com/
Welcome to the Planet Earth Division of the Universal Adoption Service Providers Network (UASPN).
The Baby Being is a lovable, safe and collectible doll for children, as well as fans of science-fiction and those who have a real interest in the possibility of extra-terrestrial life.
The UASPN hopes that children and adults will enjoy this unique gift that truly goes beyond the boundaries of gender and race. Baby Being is 11 Inches (28 cm) from head to toe and weighs 3/4 of an Earthling pound.
For many years, Earthlings have lovingly accepted millions of beautiful orphaned earthling babies and children into their lives and homes. After decades of negotiation with our sister planets in other galaxies, we are happy to announce that earth citizens are now eligible to adopt a Baby Being for the low one-time interstellar adoption fee of $29.95
― amon (eman), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 23:50 (twenty years ago)
― amon (eman), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 23:53 (twenty years ago)
LOL
― Cunga (Cunga), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 23:54 (twenty years ago)
― 400% Nice (nordicskilla), Thursday, 6 October 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Monday, 10 October 2005 01:43 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Monday, 10 October 2005 01:46 (twenty years ago)
― 400% Nice (nordicskilla), Monday, 10 October 2005 01:52 (twenty years ago)
From Radar:
Scientology Comes to South Park
South Park is the highest-rated show on Comedy Central thanks to its willingness to slaughter sacred cows, but sources say even show creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone are a bit nervous about the blowback from tonight’s episode. Entitled “Trapped in the Closet,� the duo set their crudely animated sights on Scientology and Tom Cruise—topics previously deemed “off limits� due to the actor’s close ties to Comedy Central’s sister company, Paramount Pictures, we’re told.
According to a source who has read a draft of the script, it begins with Stan leaving a psychiatrist’s office only to be hailed as a savior by the leaders of a strange, Scientology-esque cult because of his off-the-chart results on an E-meter-like “personality test.� A group of Hollywood A-listers quickly gather outside Stan’s house, we’re told, with Tom Cruise somehow ending up stuck in a closet—leading a news crew stationed at the scene to report that Cruise’s fans fervently want the actor to “just come out.�
In the end, R&B star R. Kelly—whose multi-song summer opus gave the episode its name—swoops in to save the day. (We suspect Chef will be sitting this one out. A rep for Isaac Hayes, who supplies the voice of South Park’s horny cook and who happens to be a Scientologist, said her client hadn’t heard about the plot and that she didn’t “think Chef was even in it.�)
The unwanted cartoon cameo comes at an awkward time for Cruise. The actor recently canned his career-wrecking publisister Lee Anne DeVette, and has been trying to restore his image with help from Rogers & Cowan spin-masters Paul Bloch and Arnold Robinson. Comedy Central’s parent company, Viacom—which also owns Paramount—might not be too keen either about seeing its studio’s big-money Mission Impossible 3 star ridiculed yet again just when America had seemingly moved on from its obsession with his sexuality and Scientology ties.
Asked about the South Park episode, Robinson said, “We have no knowledge of it, so we don’t have any opinion about it at all.� Paramount spokeswoman Nancy Kirkpatrick also declined to comment, saying, “I don’t know anything about it…. I can’t make that judgement.�
Comedy Central spokesman Tony Fox explained that he didn’t know any details of the show because, “these guys literally write and rewrite the episode almost right up to the moment it airs.� Asked whether taking potshots at Cruise and Scientology was a wise move, Fox said the network has Stone and Parker’s back: “If you know South Park, they are free and have been free to satirize anybody and anything they want to. They’ve made fun of MTV, they’ve made fun of Viacom, they’ve made fun of Comedy Central, and we’ve never interfered with them.�
But will Xenu and his legion of intergalactic followers be as forgiving?
― Je4nne Æ’uyÂ¥ (Je4nne Fury), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 22:00 (twenty years ago)
The Denial!!!
Happy Valentines Day!!1
― pixel farmer (Rock Hardy), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 01:55 (twenty years ago)
haha
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 02:49 (twenty years ago)
― josh in sf (stfu kthx), Wednesday, 15 February 2006 17:48 (twenty years ago)
Dude wants a spot in the new Star Trek movie.
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 26 October 2006 14:24 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish moose tracks (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 23:35 (nineteen years ago)
Hitler too.
― am0n (am0n), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 23:44 (nineteen years ago)
Holy shit I know you all have seen the video! So why is nobody talking about this?
TOM CRUISE IS HERE TO HELP.
― J, Sunday, 20 January 2008 14:11 (eighteen years ago)
very terrifying
― roxymuzak, Sunday, 20 January 2008 14:16 (eighteen years ago)
we're talking about it on a nother thread.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 20 January 2008 14:24 (eighteen years ago)
try to spot it!
― roxymuzak, Sunday, 20 January 2008 14:26 (eighteen years ago)
Aha. I have topic-blindness.
― J, Sunday, 20 January 2008 14:42 (eighteen years ago)
;)
― roxymuzak, Sunday, 20 January 2008 16:03 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzIM5Ya0yYM
― latebloomer, Thursday, 27 March 2008 03:58 (eighteen years ago)
A+
― sleep, Thursday, 27 March 2008 04:19 (eighteen years ago)
interview with some VERY interesting anecdotes from former $cientologist about Cruise and David Miscaviage (the leader of $cientology):
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/stations/bc/glosslip/2008/04/25/Glosslip-From-Our-Lips-To-Your-Ears
"Glosslip Radio keeps going in its coverage of the abuses of the Church of Scientology. This segment's guest is Marc Headley a 15-year veteran of the CoS where he worked closely with CoS leader David Miscavige and actor Tom Cruise. Marc has explosive details about both men and we are thrilled to be able to talk to him. For more info on March, visit Glosslip.com, including details about Miscavige beating Scientology staff members."
― latebloomer, Thursday, 14 August 2008 19:37 (seventeen years ago)
tom cruise is such a sad man :/
― Surmounter, Thursday, 14 August 2008 19:40 (seventeen years ago)
hey, can anyone help me find the post where the crazy sc1ent0l0gy video was discussed? am struggling...
― the fap where all the dudes fawned over my chick (stevie), Saturday, 24 January 2009 23:24 (seventeen years ago)
David Beckham says it isn't easy sitting down to dinner with Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes.
"We were at dinner once with Tom and Katie ... and we sat there and everyone was like, 'OK, let's play a music game, let's start a singing game!'" Beckham, 34, recalled on George Lopez's TBS late night show, Lopez Tonight, Wednesday
― you are wrong I'm bone thugs in harmon (omar little), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:11 (sixteen years ago)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/etienne_saint/becknite.jpg
― you are wrong I'm bone thugs in harmon (omar little), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:12 (sixteen years ago)
What is a singing game?
― just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:19 (sixteen years ago)
London Bridge is Falling Down?
― Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:19 (sixteen years ago)
hahahahahahaha wait
― Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:19 (sixteen years ago)
so basically she is still a massive nerd who doesn't realize she's cute and he is superturbogay and also a massive nerd, is that what Beckham is saying
― Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:20 (sixteen years ago)
a terrifying moment where you realize your ascent to the top levels of fame and fortune will end in singing in the round with a pair of celebrities who believe we are controlled by aliens and volcanoes.
― you are wrong I'm bone thugs in harmon (omar little), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:23 (sixteen years ago)
"No offense, Tom Cruise, but if you could stop talking and just wear these sunglasses for the rest of our meal it would go a long way towards sustaining my boyhood fantasy of what life at the top is like."
"so no singing?"
"No, just wear the glasses and occasionally break into a devilish grin while we eat. Thank you so much."
― Cunga, Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:35 (sixteen years ago)
U2 is fuckin' ponderous, man
― LJ 1214b (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:37 (sixteen years ago)
They were just trying to embarrass Victoria.
― ô_o (Nicole), Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:42 (sixteen years ago)
The idea of those listening to the dinner party converstion of those 4 in a room at one time is a good working definition of hell
― Attention please, a child has been lost in the tunnel of goats. (James Morrison), Thursday, 17 December 2009 22:34 (sixteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/LeF3y.jpg
― DavidM, Thursday, 27 October 2011 16:25 (fourteen years ago)
Not passionate enough, I guesshttp://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20608003,00.html
― nicest bitch of poster (La Lechera), Friday, 29 June 2012 17:19 (thirteen years ago)
A friend of my wife's predicted this years ago. Apparently five years was all part of the "contract".
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Friday, 29 June 2012 17:21 (thirteen years ago)
When does the tell-all come out? That's what I want to know.
― nicest bitch of poster (La Lechera), Friday, 29 June 2012 17:23 (thirteen years ago)
She probably had to sign a non-disclosure agreement. I wonder how many people would be married to Tom Cruise for five years if it meant a lot of money?
― I found him in a Bon Ton ad (Nicole), Friday, 29 June 2012 17:43 (thirteen years ago)
If it means a lot of lectures about Scientology I think it might be less than you think.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Friday, 29 June 2012 17:50 (thirteen years ago)
l. ron hubbub
― am0n, Friday, 29 June 2012 17:53 (thirteen years ago)
http://theorange.co/storage/TC%20-%20Squirt%20in%20Face.gif?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1339772030534http://theorange.co/storage/TC%20-%20Creepy%20Laugh.gif?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1339771708483http://theorange.co/storage/TC%20-%20Squirt%20in%20Face.gif?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1339772030534http://theorange.co/storage/TC%20-%20Creepy%20Laugh.gif?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1339771708483http://theorange.co/storage/TC%20-%20Squirt%20in%20Face.gif?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1339772030534http://theorange.co/storage/TC%20-%20Creepy%20Laugh.gif?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1339771708483http://theorange.co/storage/TC%20-%20Squirt%20in%20Face.gif?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1339772030534http://theorange.co/storage/TC%20-%20Creepy%20Laugh.gif?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1339771708483
― am0n, Friday, 29 June 2012 18:10 (thirteen years ago)
you fucking people broke my monitor
― a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 29 June 2012 18:13 (thirteen years ago)
is it weird that my reaction to this is being irritated at all the people who are making five-year contract comments and being like WELL EVERYONE KNEW THIS MARRIAGE WAS A SHAM AMIRITE and so overbearingly world-weary about it? like not just here but on FB etc. i don't even know why i'm irritated about it, i guess it could be true, but just like something about this pervasive society-wide cynicism creeps me out.
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 29 June 2012 18:46 (thirteen years ago)
also it's been 5.5 years since they got married, so did they build an extra six months into the contract to make it a little less suspicious or was there bureaucratic red-tape or something?
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 29 June 2012 18:47 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah, I totally wish people could be a little less cynical and more sincere about our treasured celebrity marriages.
― Julie Derpy (Phil D.), Friday, 29 June 2012 18:48 (thirteen years ago)
maybe it's just sadness that something can be so obviously fake that it fools literally no one
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 29 June 2012 18:48 (thirteen years ago)
xxp Lawyers being lawyers prob.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Friday, 29 June 2012 18:48 (thirteen years ago)
she seemed so happy
― goole, Friday, 29 June 2012 18:57 (thirteen years ago)
she was an sp all along
― am0n, Friday, 29 June 2012 18:58 (thirteen years ago)
"It's so hot out, Tom Cruise had to shave his beard"
― manditory fun. day (Ówen P.), Friday, 29 June 2012 18:59 (thirteen years ago)
tom, consider this marriage
*drops papers on dinner table*
suppressed.
― goole, Friday, 29 June 2012 18:59 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqlyQZkq2Ug
uh oh, tom's back on the prowl! vrooom vroom!
― da croupier, Friday, 29 June 2012 21:04 (thirteen years ago)
Third Party Law: It was clearly all Suri's fault.
― 'Sit pax in valle tamesis' ('Let there be Peace in the Thames Valley') (Viceroy), Friday, 29 June 2012 21:08 (thirteen years ago)
A THIRD PARTY MUST BE PRESENT AND UNKNOWN IN EVERY QUARREL FOR A CONFLICT TO EXIST
why do the alien cult people bring outsiders into their world? i thought that was half the point of the alien cult. that the fake marriages were in-house.
― scott seward, Friday, 29 June 2012 22:17 (thirteen years ago)
maybe there is a special "normal partner" dispensation for movie star alien cult members
― nicest bitch of poster (La Lechera), Friday, 29 June 2012 22:34 (thirteen years ago)
http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t214/ZachRScott/tomcruise.gif
― Mad God 40/40 (Z S), Friday, 29 June 2012 22:42 (thirteen years ago)
it's weird that one of the biggest actors in the world is likely this sad, deluded little man
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Friday, 29 June 2012 23:10 (thirteen years ago)
THINK ABOUT IT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Y7CpS0gtlk
― am0n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 00:00 (thirteen years ago)
you're glib
― da croupier, Saturday, 30 June 2012 00:06 (thirteen years ago)
matt lauer is glib, it's true.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Saturday, 30 June 2012 00:54 (thirteen years ago)
where do celebrity relationship portmanteaus go when no one needs them anymore
― lag∞n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 00:58 (thirteen years ago)
http://todayentertainment.today.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/29/12485327-all-three-of-tom-cruises-marriages-ended-when-wife-was-33
― lag∞n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:00 (thirteen years ago)
like the dead rock stars age of tom cruise divorcees
― Chris S, Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:03 (thirteen years ago)
nicole kidman and mimi rogers jammin in heaven
― lag∞n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:05 (thirteen years ago)
You know, he's a loon, but a few years back I was totally surprised that he participated in the DVD commentary for "Risky Business," in a totally laid-back fun sort of way. Obviously he could have blown it off, or mailed in some EPK palaver, but he was there chatting away with the director for two hours. I thought, hey, not bad, Cruise. For a loon.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:06 (thirteen years ago)
he owed that guy in a big way.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:07 (thirteen years ago)
what a low bar cruise has to clear to impress, hold conversation with former co-worker for two hours
― he bit me (it felt like a diss) (m bison), Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:07 (thirteen years ago)
risky business is so rad
― lag∞n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:08 (thirteen years ago)
tom cruise is p awesome
― lag∞n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:09 (thirteen years ago)
xxpost Careful how you use that word "clear," mister.
I think it's a masterpiece, for real. Like Michael Mann directing a sex comedy.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:09 (thirteen years ago)
Set in Chicago, Tangerine Dream score, sly critique of capitalism, moody lighting ...
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:10 (thirteen years ago)
misogyny...
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:11 (thirteen years ago)
its dreamy
― lag∞n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:11 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.conspirazzi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/fish/leper.jpg
― lag∞n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:35 (thirteen years ago)
not surprised Tom Cruise would be a bro about the RB commentary. He condescended to give Billy Wilder a meeting when Cameron Crowe considered him for the part of the older sports agent guru in Jerry Maguire. Why would Tom Cruise give Billy Wilder ten minutes?
― a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:39 (thirteen years ago)
this looks like it could be good:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oblivion_(2013_film)
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:46 (thirteen years ago)
live action wall-e remake
― lag∞n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:48 (thirteen years ago)
god i loved war of the worlds so much. i could watch it every day. i never thought i would ever love another tomcat or spielbergcat movie again.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 01:51 (thirteen years ago)
He seems completely unbalanced irl but he has made a lot of good movies. I'd rather that than a nice well adjusted actor who makes a lot of dreck.
― I found him in a Bon Ton ad (Nicole), Saturday, 30 June 2012 02:20 (thirteen years ago)
I saw about 15 minutes of Born on the Fourth of July last week, and he was indeed pretty great.
― Odd Spice (Eazy), Saturday, 30 June 2012 02:54 (thirteen years ago)
I'd like to see hom and John C. Reilly do some kind of Face/Off-type body-switching movie.
― Odd Spice (Eazy), Saturday, 30 June 2012 02:55 (thirteen years ago)
He should have never fired Pat Kingsley, seriously.― Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Tuesday, August 17, 2004
― balls, Saturday, 30 June 2012 03:02 (thirteen years ago)
this might be the case of the trophy wife who turned out to be a golden raspberry
― abanana, Saturday, 30 June 2012 03:09 (thirteen years ago)
chris klein is staring at his phone tonight
― balls, Saturday, 30 June 2012 03:18 (thirteen years ago)
you think tom will give chris klein a booty call?
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 03:27 (thirteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/l8B20.jpg
― diamonddave85, Saturday, 30 June 2012 03:31 (thirteen years ago)
Hey, how does one raise a child a Scientyouknowwhatist, exactly? Do they put kids through the same nonsense as adults? Hook them up to doodads and make them confess transgressions? Do the Youknowwhats believe in some equivalent of original sin, or are they given free reign until some specific age when their parents are all, hey, now you get hooked up to machines! Do Scient... kids get home schooled a lot? Does the (ahem) Church have its own parochial schools?
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 June 2012 13:02 (thirteen years ago)
Slate:
This is shaping up to be a crummy season for Scientology. New Yorker writer Paul Haggis is said to be writing an exposé of the church. The movie The Master, due in the fall, takes a highly critical look at a church/cult that appears awfully similar to Scientology. And of course, Scientologist John Travolta has been inundated with lawsuits from several men, including massage therapists and a personal assistant, alleging he made unwanted sexual advances, including asking one of the men to “take me.” This is not the sort of scandal Travolta can fix by simply kissing his wife on the red carpet, though he did try. Given the persistent rumors that Tom Cruise is also gay, there will be no doubt those who joke that the men’s marriages are dissolving so that they, at last, can be together. We, however, will not make this joke.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 June 2012 13:05 (thirteen years ago)
There are apparently sci-tie schools out there operating under the auspices of Montessori schools. There was one that got outed as being sci-tie in Toronto a few years ago and Jonathan Larroquette attended a sci-tie preschool or something in L.A. in the 80s.xp
― the dave cool channel you are supposed to watch (how's life), Saturday, 30 June 2012 13:06 (thirteen years ago)
Do Sci kids say the pledge of allegiance? Sit out Christmas carols?
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 June 2012 13:08 (thirteen years ago)
Etc?
http://i.imgur.com/OtyNj.gif
― I found him in a Bon Ton ad (Nicole), Saturday, 30 June 2012 13:09 (thirteen years ago)
33 = Masonic plot to destroy Scientology, obviously.
― Three Word Username, Saturday, 30 June 2012 13:09 (thirteen years ago)
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Np3prmY-_X8/T8reIRnTwVI/AAAAAAAACGY/RzNg9fLQepQ/s400/Frank+TJ+Mackey+03.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 June 2012 13:49 (thirteen years ago)
I don't think I have ever seen a film with Tom Cruise in where I've liked him. To be honest, I can't think of any films with Tom Cruise in that are good at all. Magnolia is an okay film, I like certain bits of it a lot, find others a bit cloying, and I don't think his acting is very good. Obviously his character is supposed to be unlikeable, so it's unsurprising that I dislike the character, but there's something about the way it's acted too, that I just think... it isn't actually any good.
Oh, I guess that one time I got my boyfriend to DJ chillwave over the top of Legend, that was quite cool. But aside from that... nah.
― emil.y, Saturday, 30 June 2012 13:56 (thirteen years ago)
have you seen ghost protocol?
― the dave cool channel you are supposed to watch (how's life), Saturday, 30 June 2012 14:10 (thirteen years ago)
war of the worlds is a msterpiece. so is the outsiders. so is taps.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 14:18 (thirteen years ago)
He is probably Hollywood's weirdest looking guy to be considered handsome. No slight intended, but I think he looks a lot like a capybara or other large rodent.
― uncondensed milky way (remy bean), Saturday, 30 June 2012 14:21 (thirteen years ago)
I have not seen Ghost Protocol. I don't like action films, that might be one thing.
Also, capybaras are way cuter than Tom Cruise.
― emil.y, Saturday, 30 June 2012 14:23 (thirteen years ago)
The only performance of his I haven't liked is in 'Tropic Thunder'. Aside from that Cruise is golden to me.I liked his character in 'Magnolia'. emil.y the cruiser is "quietly judging you" for your dissent.
― pandemic, Saturday, 30 June 2012 14:24 (thirteen years ago)
i like almost every tom cruise movie ive seen, and ive seen almost all of them
― lag∞n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 14:27 (thirteen years ago)
mi1, jerry macguire, collateral, risky business etc all so good
― lag∞n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 14:30 (thirteen years ago)
even the bad ones are good because you get to see tom cruise giving 110% in every scene, you always know he will be acting his hardest
minority report was so bad. that's the one where he just stands in front of an electronic chalk board for half the movie, right? he does give 110% when he does his crazy chalkboard routine though.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 14:56 (thirteen years ago)
see
― lag∞n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 14:57 (thirteen years ago)
colin farell said tom cruise intensely researched the electronic chalk board and learned how it worked and everything, when clearly just waiving yr hands around in the air wouldve sufficed, which is what colin farell did
― lag∞n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 14:58 (thirteen years ago)
I liked Minority Report a lot, except for the ending. But not sticking the ending is more of a Spielberg issue than a Cruise issue.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:00 (thirteen years ago)
war of the worlds was so amazing.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:02 (thirteen years ago)
it didnt make a huge impression on me, maybe i should rescreen
― lag∞n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:03 (thirteen years ago)
i don't even really know what people think of that movie. i just thought it was amazing and beautiful.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:05 (thirteen years ago)
i don't think i even read any reviews of it. i didn't even see it in the theatre. one of the great regrets of my life :(
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:07 (thirteen years ago)
its rly good but with a terrible pro-military/pro-usa ending
― am0n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:13 (thirteen years ago)
the aliens and their technology are def scary and the sound design is nuts
― am0n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:14 (thirteen years ago)
i kinda disliked it? but not enough to really argue against it. and i did see it in theaters.
― Authorities don't know who shot the 50 Cent the goose. (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:15 (thirteen years ago)
the opening 2/3 of wotw in particular is pretty great
if u wanna talk terrible endings tho, i remember ppl actually laughing in the theater
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:23 (thirteen years ago)
I was impressed that spielberg showed the aliens draining people of their blood and misting the blood everywhere and keeping them in the cages
― Faith in Humanity: Restored (dayo), Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:25 (thirteen years ago)
whatever floats yr boat man
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:27 (thirteen years ago)
keeping them in the cages andn ot letting them go on the boat and drowning them in the water
― Faith in Humanity: Restored (dayo), Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:30 (thirteen years ago)
thats what aliens do (bad ones)
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:32 (thirteen years ago)
americans too (guantanamo/waterboarding) ;o)
― am0n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:42 (thirteen years ago)
that water scene with the boat...oh god like a nightmare perfectly realized.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:43 (thirteen years ago)
i just never thought i would feel spielberg majik again. i wanted to love a.i. but i didn't.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:48 (thirteen years ago)
Tim Robbins was terrible in War of the Worlds. Is Tim Robbins good in anything? He always seems to be hypnotized, Herzog-style
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:49 (thirteen years ago)
Have you seen AI again since you had kids?
Just curious.
like epic all-consuming spielberg majik. i've probably enjoyed some stuff that he's done in the recent past but not on that jaws/close encounters level.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:50 (thirteen years ago)
One answer to earlier questions about schools (learned this from the Haggis article, I think):
http://www.delphian.org/
― Odd Spice (Eazy), Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:50 (thirteen years ago)
knight and day is underrated, it's sort of like bringing up baby in that everyone is a dangerous lunatic in it and tom cruise is perfect for that
― da croupier, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:50 (thirteen years ago)
no. i would watch ai again though.
when cameron diaz is all "is tom the good guy or just some delusional psychopath?" it wouldn't work with like matt damon, of course he's a sweetheart. but yeah tom might bite your face off.
― da croupier, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:51 (thirteen years ago)
i wasn't a tintin fan. but i'd had a long day. that movie felt like it was 4 hours long. movie seats made me hurt.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:52 (thirteen years ago)
never realized that ILX housed so many tom cruise fans. i liked him early on (outsiders, risky business), but quickly came to think he was just the worst. still, i admit that he's got incredible "screen presence" and can act up a storm. despite my reservations, i loved him in eyes wide shut.
spielberg's war of the worlds is a drag.
― contenderizer, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:53 (thirteen years ago)
no.
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:54 (thirteen years ago)
i just looked at spielberg wiki and i didn't even know that the movie war horse existed. guess that's what you get when you don't have cable and don't read newspapers.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:54 (thirteen years ago)
war horse of the worlds
― Faith in Humanity: Restored (dayo), Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:55 (thirteen years ago)
war of the horse worlds
wotw is some fucked up shit but def entertaining
― da croupier, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:56 (thirteen years ago)
war of the worlds is opposite of drag for me. completely riveting from first to last. a film school could teach a course just on that movie. its big but there are those tiny tense moments that he is still apparently a friggin' genius at creating. after all this time!
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:56 (thirteen years ago)
i dig scary spielberg.
i'd definitely watch wotw again before close encounters
― da croupier, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:57 (thirteen years ago)
yeah it has its problems but I dunno how you could think WoTW was a drag
― Faith in Humanity: Restored (dayo), Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:57 (thirteen years ago)
he mostly uses his forces for good but he could make a movie that would scare the hell out of everyone on earth if he felt like it.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:57 (thirteen years ago)
(i mean he kinda did with poltergeist...)
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:58 (thirteen years ago)
i really like watching tom cruise on screen too. i care very little about his off-screen life.
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:58 (thirteen years ago)
spielberg's probably been responsible for scaring more children than any other filmmaker
― da croupier, Saturday, 30 June 2012 15:59 (thirteen years ago)
cruise performances definitely err on the side of annoying than boring, something to be said for that
― da croupier, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:00 (thirteen years ago)
looking at the spielwiki i see empire of the sun - a movie that the majority of the planet has completely forgotten if they ever saw it in the first place - and i can't help but think about how that movie would have been another director's crowning achievement in life and when people talk about spielberg they never even mention it. (not talking about YOU dweebs, you probably talk about it. talking about normal people.)
but i guess you could say that about a lot of great directors. i need to see that again. tonight. maybe they have it at the FYE store...
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:05 (thirteen years ago)
― da croupier, Saturday, June 30, 2012 11:50 AM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark
its awful actually
― scott seward, Saturday, June 30, 2012 11:57 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
i was just thinking that. the image in wotw that always sticks with me are the people tearing the windshield open with their fingers. that made me go daaaamnnnn
― Black_vegeta (Hungry4Ass), Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:09 (thirteen years ago)
ive always loved cruise. and i always knew he was crazy. i remember when minority report was coming out, someone asked him in an interview why his face is always being mutilated or masked in his recent films, and he kind of laughed it off, but i was like A-HA! i decided then that he had michael jackson levels of crazy bubbling underneath. just seeing his insane cry-for-help laughter when doing press should've been enough to tip everyone off, the couch jumping wasnt even necessary
― Black_vegeta (Hungry4Ass), Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:11 (thirteen years ago)
totally agree with the first 2/3 of WOTW being amazing, so many truly scary, haunting things happen, but then it pretty much goes off the rails.
moment when burning train rolls by is just random and frightening.
― Moodles, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:15 (thirteen years ago)
its awesome!
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:18 (thirteen years ago)
i don't mind the robbins stuff either. i just thought it was weird and creepy and scary! what a strange long interlude to stick into your blockbuster. dude is a genius. all is forgiven for Hook. and i never thought i would be able to say that.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:19 (thirteen years ago)
― da croupier, Saturday, June 30, 2012 11:59 AM (23 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
this!! bio-suits in ET, aliens coming in under the door in close encounters... freakin mola ram pulling out hearts...
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:24 (thirteen years ago)
face meltings, not to mention bits in amblin films like gremlins, goonies, poltergeist...
joe queenan's written a lot about the fondness of big male actors for being tortured and having their faces jacked up - brando, eastwood, gibson, stallone, etc (http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2007/jul/23/art.joequeenan - longer piece in one of his books). queenan figured these guys knew dudes wouldn't support them if they didn't get their pretty selves knocked around, but most of these guys were lunatics too
― da croupier, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:25 (thirteen years ago)
there was also something i read once about a run of movies travolta did where he died at the end of every single one
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:26 (thirteen years ago)
but ya, spielz was never the cuddly fam-friendly director ppl may assume he was, a big part of his ability to drawn in kids was his use of the grotesque and scary
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:27 (thirteen years ago)
will smith went through a real isolated messianic run there with hancock, i am legend, pursuit of happyness and seven pounds xpost
― da croupier, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:28 (thirteen years ago)
― da croupier, Saturday, June 30, 2012 12:25 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
nice
― Black_vegeta (Hungry4Ass), Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:29 (thirteen years ago)
can't find it online, but Queenan's face-mashing overview, "The 400 Blows," is in his Confessions Of A Cineplex Heckler book
― da croupier, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:31 (thirteen years ago)
it's the christ thing. mel being the extreme example.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:36 (thirteen years ago)
makes sense in a non-crazy way that people who become famous for their hero faces would be intrigued by stories in which that's threatened or obscured.
― contenderizer, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:36 (thirteen years ago)
probably just guilt that they make so much money for being pretty. well, not in stallone's case, but in other cases...
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:40 (thirteen years ago)
flipping through the queenan piece (actually named "the 4000 blows", my bad), he mentions that while just about every big male star has been beat up once, stallone is the only actor who's famous ONLY for movies where his face is bashed in.
― da croupier, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:42 (thirteen years ago)
xp - plus anxiety about the threat, a wish to prove that they're more than just an appearance, aspirational toughness, etc.
― contenderizer, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:43 (thirteen years ago)
Jaws, dudes.
Empire of the Sun is a really great movie. Totally overlooked, or at least forgotten about.
Mel Gibson is notorious for getting tortured and beat up in films.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:45 (thirteen years ago)
i even love the dad/kids stuff in the house before the aliens come. those scenes are great. what a great movie.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:50 (thirteen years ago)
sorry, can't stop thinking about war of the worlds.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:51 (thirteen years ago)
i saw empire of the sun when i was a kid and it made a big impression on me.
― goole, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:52 (thirteen years ago)
not any of the 'big' shots but just the interaction between john malkovich and kid bale, which i thought was the coolest thing ever at the time.
― goole, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:53 (thirteen years ago)
i need to own a copy of that movie. i'm actually talking about empire now! also WOTW too though. i actually did a copy of that, but i might have sold it in the store...
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:53 (thirteen years ago)
maybe i need to see WotW again, i dunno. saw spielberg's version as an overinflated restatement padded out with redundant daddy hero/family in peril shit. best bit was the cat and mouse sequence in the basement and that was taken straight out of the original.
empire of the sun is brilliant.
― contenderizer, Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:55 (thirteen years ago)
thats actually the worst bit
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:58 (thirteen years ago)
no wait the tim robbins basement stuff is the worst... actually the last shot is the worst.
but you're wrong about the rest
what does "overinflated" even mean in that context
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Saturday, 30 June 2012 16:59 (thirteen years ago)
Empire of the Sun is kinda famous around these parts in that an ILXor almost got Christian Bale's role. Alternate histories and all.
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 30 June 2012 17:01 (thirteen years ago)
xp - lot of big, expensive-looking, digitally-engineered things happen without generating much by way of tension or thrills
― contenderizer, Saturday, 30 June 2012 17:02 (thirteen years ago)
totally thrilling and tense!
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 17:23 (thirteen years ago)
eh whatever. i think the tension is a star of the movie. they are so close to doom the whole time and you feel that.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 17:25 (thirteen years ago)
ya not to mention the fact that wotw was one of the first movies to really be economical about what "big expensive things" you actually see... i remember thinking how great it was that it was all from tom cruise's POV
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Saturday, 30 June 2012 17:25 (thirteen years ago)
― scott seward, Saturday, June 30, 2012 1:25 PM (40 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
exactly... the whole movie until the end is just about him running away!
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Saturday, 30 June 2012 17:26 (thirteen years ago)
maybe i was hungover at the time
― contenderizer, Saturday, 30 June 2012 17:26 (thirteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, June 30, 2012 12:01 PM (24 minutes ago)
Never heard that before. What's the story?
― Biff Wellington (WmC), Saturday, 30 June 2012 17:26 (thirteen years ago)
the whole movie until the end is just about him running away!
Isn't this 90% of Cruise's movies
― Number None, Saturday, 30 June 2012 17:30 (thirteen years ago)
sorry to hear you didn't get that callback, ned
― goole, Saturday, 30 June 2012 17:33 (thirteen years ago)
It was so sad.
More seriously: Alba, who may or may not post much any more, is IRL one N1ck Dast00r, son of an actor as well. Pretty much it was down to him and Mr. Bale and the latter got the nod, though Alba did get another role in the film. Alba being a good fellow and all, there is an alternate universe where he's winning awards for The Fighter and explaining about Batman while Mr. Bale is trolling us here going "LA DE DE DA."
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 30 June 2012 17:39 (thirteen years ago)
Cool! "The More You Know"® etc
― Biff Wellington (WmC), Saturday, 30 June 2012 17:51 (thirteen years ago)
No offense to Alba, but I don't know if anyone else could have made the choices Bale has made career-wise
― da croupier, Saturday, 30 June 2012 17:56 (thirteen years ago)
like, there's an alternate reality where another british kid was in a spielberg movie, but i don't know if that kid went on to dance in newsies, play patrick bateman and practice gun kata
― da croupier, Saturday, 30 June 2012 17:57 (thirteen years ago)
actually, alba's film tastes are pretty out there too
― da croupier, Saturday, 30 June 2012 17:58 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJdMDvjfyQ0
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 June 2012 18:03 (thirteen years ago)
Come to think of it, Cruise didn't really shift over to action flicks until he was pushing 40, did he? It's like the older he gets, the more action movie guy he gets.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 June 2012 18:06 (thirteen years ago)
Megastar midlife crisis?
― fancy poodle (latebloomer), Saturday, 30 June 2012 18:18 (thirteen years ago)
what would alba's voice as batman be like
― mookieproof, Saturday, 30 June 2012 18:49 (thirteen years ago)
oi, alfie, fetch me blood sausages innit time to flog some baddies aye
― m bison, Saturday, 30 June 2012 18:55 (thirteen years ago)
that was terrible, I'm sorry
― m bison, Saturday, 30 June 2012 18:58 (thirteen years ago)
All of Cruise's three marriages broke up when his wife at the time was 33, and ended when she was 34.
― polyphonic, Saturday, 30 June 2012 19:06 (thirteen years ago)
whatta bombshell
― am0n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 19:12 (thirteen years ago)
Apparently she filed the papers this time.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 June 2012 19:13 (thirteen years ago)
"It's like the older he gets, the more action movie guy he gets."
the Cage conundrum.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 19:15 (thirteen years ago)
http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1105484.1341081473!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_635/image.jpg
― am0n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 19:23 (thirteen years ago)
Tom Cruise as Bad Lieutenant would be great.
― Odd Spice (Eazy), Saturday, 30 June 2012 19:55 (thirteen years ago)
http://gma.yahoo.com/toms-turn-katie-holmes-shocks-him-surprised-nicole-203827407--abc-news-tv.html
He should go for Elisabeth Moss.
― Odd Spice (Eazy), Saturday, 30 June 2012 20:21 (thirteen years ago)
war of the worlds is pretty remarkable. that whole section of the film when they escape the initial alien attack is like the spielster showing roland emmerich how to do that shit right.
― omar little, Saturday, 30 June 2012 21:02 (thirteen years ago)
Dag: http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2012/06/katie_holmes_scientology_sec_checking_suri_tom_cruise.php
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 June 2012 21:38 (thirteen years ago)
― scott seward, Saturday, June 30, 2012 2:15 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
see also: kate beckinsale.
WOTW is utterly terrifying until the last reel and i give spielberg major props for that. although on a personal level it's almost too disturbing and unedifying for me to handle. it feels like a 100 minute snuff film sometimes.
haven't seen empire of the sun since 1987 but i was so moved by it at the time that i almost rose out of my seat to cheer at one point. probably one of the most intense moviegoing experiences i had as a kid. have no idea what i'd make of it now.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Saturday, 30 June 2012 21:40 (thirteen years ago)
yeah the part in WOTW when the guy just shoots the other guy as they drive away.
though made me wonder, movie reality and all but if aliens invaded, the gun shops would be the first to be looted I would think, maybe there just arent that many guns in bahston
― now all my posts got ship in it (dayo), Saturday, 30 June 2012 21:41 (thirteen years ago)
― contenderizer, Saturday, June 30, 2012 1:02 PM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Haha, this is literal crazy-person talk. Almost from the moment that first tripod comes out of the ground it's crazy tension and thrills with a few small interludes. Especially the section from where everyone's waiting to get on the ferry, that godawful sound goes off and those tripods appear over the hill, to when they first enter the basement is bravura excitement.
― Julie Derpy (Phil D.), Saturday, 30 June 2012 21:50 (thirteen years ago)
I thought it was gonna be lame and bloodless when the people were literally just vaporized but shit got real with the red fungus
― now all my posts got ship in it (dayo), Saturday, 30 June 2012 21:52 (thirteen years ago)
That's right out of the book, too. The first victims are simply vaporized by the Heat Ray, later people die a lot more violently.
― Julie Derpy (Phil D.), Saturday, 30 June 2012 22:04 (thirteen years ago)
meat contenderizer
― am0n, Saturday, 30 June 2012 22:44 (thirteen years ago)
love WOTW. one of the few movies that have given me the similar rush of excitement as an adult that i regularly got at blockbuster movies as a kid. Ferry scene is all time.
― ryan, Saturday, 30 June 2012 23:08 (thirteen years ago)
The ending of WotW makes me so mad that I can't really appreciate the rest of it.
― I found him in a Bon Ton ad (Nicole), Saturday, 30 June 2012 23:15 (thirteen years ago)
Just turn it off with thirty minutes to go and announced "And they all died, the end."
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 30 June 2012 23:16 (thirteen years ago)
i... don't remember the end?
i also loved wotw and was surprisingly gut-wrenched by it.
― Misc. Carnivora (Matt P), Saturday, 30 June 2012 23:18 (thirteen years ago)
Empire of the Sun was my first really memorable movie-going experience. Picked the book up years later and it didn't make as much of an impression, then again Ballard channels those experiences through SF.
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 30 June 2012 23:18 (thirteen years ago)
Spielberg's constant fumbling of his endings is so jarring most of the time if it was anyone else you'd think he was parodying happy endings.
― ryan, Saturday, 30 June 2012 23:36 (thirteen years ago)
"love WOTW. one of the few movies that have given me the similar rush of excitement as an adult that i regularly got at blockbuster movies as a kid."
this is it right there. movie magic. for real. say what you want about spielberg but the dude bleeds film. in his lesser stuff the manipulation (and sappiness) can piss you off, but when he's on, i'll follow him anywhere.
― scott seward, Saturday, 30 June 2012 23:39 (thirteen years ago)
you guys are almost making me to want to re-watch WOTW but...nah
― Number None, Saturday, 30 June 2012 23:44 (thirteen years ago)
I thought we established seven years ago that WOTW is top-notch Spielberg thrillmaking (up until the Tim Robbins stuff if that really bugs you that much).
― old people are made of poop (Eric H.), Saturday, 30 June 2012 23:54 (thirteen years ago)
People blaming Steven Spielberg for an ending that H.G. Wells essentially wrote are the worst savages.
― Julie Derpy (Phil D.), Sunday, 1 July 2012 01:17 (thirteen years ago)
I mean the last line of the book is "And strangest of all is it to hold my wife's hand again, and to think that I have counted her, and that she has counted me, among the dead."
― Julie Derpy (Phil D.), Sunday, 1 July 2012 01:19 (thirteen years ago)
In fact:
I looked at my house with a quick flash of hope that faded immediately. The door had been forced; it was unfast and was opening slowly as I approached.It slammed again. The curtains of my study fluttered out of the open window from which I and the artilleryman had watched the dawn. No one had closed it since. The smashed bushes were just as I had left them nearly four weeks ago. I stumbled into the hall, and the house felt empty. The stair carpet was ruffled and discoloured where I had crouched, soaked to the skin from the thunderstorm the night of the catastrophe. Our muddy footsteps I saw still went up the stairs.I followed them to my study, and found lying on my writing-table still, with the selenite paper weight upon it, the sheet of work I had left on the afternoon of the opening of the cylinder. For a space I stood reading over my abandoned arguments. It was a paper on the probable development of Moral Ideas with the development of the civilising process; and the last sentence was the opening of a prophecy: "In about two hundred years," I had written, "we may expect----" The sentence ended abruptly. I remembered my inability to fix my mind that morning, scarcely a month gone by, and how I had broken off to get my Daily Chronicle from the newsboy. I remembered how I went down to the garden gate as he came along, and how I had listened to his odd story of "Men from Mars."I came down and went into the dining room. There were the mutton and the bread, both far gone now in decay, and a beer bottle overturned, just as I and the artilleryman had left them. My home was desolate. I perceived the folly of the faint hope I had cherished so long. And then a strange thing occurred. "It is no use," said a voice. "The house is deserted. No one has been here these ten days. Do not stay here to torment yourself. No one escaped but you."I was startled. Had I spoken my thought aloud? I turned, and the French window was open behind me. I made a step to it, and stood looking out.And there, amazed and afraid, even as I stood amazed and afraid, were my cousin and my wife--my wife white and tearless. She gave a faint cry."I came," she said. "I knew--knew----"She put her hand to her throat--swayed. I made a step forward, and caught her in my arms.
It slammed again. The curtains of my study fluttered out of the open window from which I and the artilleryman had watched the dawn. No one had closed it since. The smashed bushes were just as I had left them nearly four weeks ago. I stumbled into the hall, and the house felt empty. The stair carpet was ruffled and discoloured where I had crouched, soaked to the skin from the thunderstorm the night of the catastrophe. Our muddy footsteps I saw still went up the stairs.
I followed them to my study, and found lying on my writing-table still, with the selenite paper weight upon it, the sheet of work I had left on the afternoon of the opening of the cylinder. For a space I stood reading over my abandoned arguments. It was a paper on the probable development of Moral Ideas with the development of the civilising process; and the last sentence was the opening of a prophecy: "In about two hundred years," I had written, "we may expect----" The sentence ended abruptly. I remembered my inability to fix my mind that morning, scarcely a month gone by, and how I had broken off to get my Daily Chronicle from the newsboy. I remembered how I went down to the garden gate as he came along, and how I had listened to his odd story of "Men from Mars."
I came down and went into the dining room. There were the mutton and the bread, both far gone now in decay, and a beer bottle overturned, just as I and the artilleryman had left them. My home was desolate. I perceived the folly of the faint hope I had cherished so long. And then a strange thing occurred. "It is no use," said a voice. "The house is deserted. No one has been here these ten days. Do not stay here to torment yourself. No one escaped but you."
I was startled. Had I spoken my thought aloud? I turned, and the French window was open behind me. I made a step to it, and stood looking out.
And there, amazed and afraid, even as I stood amazed and afraid, were my cousin and my wife--my wife white and tearless. She gave a faint cry.
"I came," she said. "I knew--knew----"
She put her hand to her throat--swayed. I made a step forward, and caught her in my arms.
This conventional wisdom about "Spielberg screws up his endings" is like the dumbest shit ever.
― Julie Derpy (Phil D.), Sunday, 1 July 2012 01:22 (thirteen years ago)
It's not that he "screws them up" (IMO) but that they are so often tonally jarring with the rest of the movie--something that's actually interesting about them! AI is of course the masterpiece of this but it's present in a lot of his movies.
― ryan, Sunday, 1 July 2012 01:44 (thirteen years ago)
It's not so much that Spielberg screwed up the ending to WOTW as much as he screwed up allowing there to have been some doubt that Cruise's son wasn't totally obliterated in that explosion halfway through the movie.
Not, of course, that I care at all. The movie's fantastic.
― old people are made of poop (Eric H.), Sunday, 1 July 2012 02:05 (thirteen years ago)
― ryan, Saturday, June 30, 2012 8:44 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
well, in A.I. it works because it is actually an incredibly emotionally devastating ending.
in WOTW it feels ridiculously unlikely given all that's come before and also completely hackneyed, the emotions don't seem real. it almost feels like a "taxi driver" ending, one that is very likely a fantasy, except that isn't really inscribed tonally into the ending it's just a result of the disjunct between it and the bulk of the film.
i haven't seen most of the big spielberg movies in a long time so i can't speak to how often he has such issues w/ endings. the one that comes to mind is schindler's list. which just feels phony. i was going to say saving private ryan but in honestly the entirety of that film feels phony to me.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Sunday, 1 July 2012 06:46 (thirteen years ago)
The ending of A.I. is v phony. Often his endings go for "emotionally devastating" registers but you often laugh when you look back, they don't survive or are enhanced by any recalls of them later on.
― xyzzzz__, Sunday, 1 July 2012 09:41 (thirteen years ago)
Except the ending of AI wasnt Speilberg's doing, it was Kubrik's. I was a little suprised to learn that, but the schmaltzy parts were all the Kubrik bits.
― Pureed Moods (Trayce), Sunday, 1 July 2012 10:06 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah but Spielbergo kept it. If we had a problem with the ending and wasn't up to changing it, he shouldn't have done it - not like anyone was putting a gun to his head..
― xyzzzz__, Sunday, 1 July 2012 10:21 (thirteen years ago)
The ending of A.I. is v phony.
Naturally. It's a fairy tale ending, to a sad story that has been reduced to a fairy tale because that's all that's left to comfort David. The closure the ending provides is intrinsically false, and deliberately so – the challenge of the last few minutes is that for the David and the audience must both accept the flimsy irreality in place of any more satisfying conclusion.
― uncondensed milky way (remy bean), Sunday, 1 July 2012 12:00 (thirteen years ago)
For that to work you'd have to grant Spil and Kub any degree of storytelling sophistication.
I'm not about to.
― xyzzzz__, Sunday, 1 July 2012 12:20 (thirteen years ago)
its cool because aliens rescued him
― lag∞n, Sunday, 1 July 2012 12:21 (thirteen years ago)
OTM. I find the end of AI to be inherently tragic, even devastating. David, the robot programmed to be just like human, outlives the entire human race, and the aliens who come to learn about humans have to learn about them from a closest-to-human robot, whose sole comfort is a fairy tale told to him by a long-dead mother he's been cruelly, almost sadistically imprinted to, the ironic outcome of William Hurt's experiment, which was of of course to deliver him to a mother Hurt knew would cast him out, just to see what would happen. It's beyond sad.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 1 July 2012 13:16 (thirteen years ago)
zzzzz
― lag∞n, Sunday, 1 July 2012 13:17 (thirteen years ago)
yall tying yrselfs in knots trying to sell this ending that was so wtf o rly when like actually viewed in the context of a movie
― lag∞n, Sunday, 1 July 2012 13:20 (thirteen years ago)
Except for the vocal minority who love this famously divisive movie, of course. It's not like we're praising Transformers 3 or something.
By the way - and this has no bearing on you, specifically, lag∞n, but goes back to something I asked Scott, but is it fair to a rate a film more highly as a parent, especially if the movie pertains explicitly to themes of parents and having children? Because my estimation of AI, which was already high, when up after I had kids. Same with a few other movies. Has my opinion been tainted by sentiment/emotion, or has it actually become more valid as I grow into an intended audience? Dunno.
Oh, and yeah, Tom Cruise.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 1 July 2012 13:31 (thirteen years ago)
(Sorry for typos, and Tom Cruise)
― uncondensed milky way (remy bean), Sunday, July 1, 2012 8:00 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
it's funny I can picture this in my head done in a kubrickian way that achieves the effect you're talking about, but spielberg's reimaging of it veers into sentimentality, spielberg wants to have his cake and eat it too
― now all my posts got ship in it (dayo), Sunday, 1 July 2012 13:36 (thirteen years ago)
yo Josh, those dudes at the end aren't aliens
― Number None, Sunday, 1 July 2012 14:34 (thirteen years ago)
tbf i feel like i actually have the most possibly emotional connection to this film because i own a robot child
― lag∞n, Sunday, 1 July 2012 14:41 (thirteen years ago)
I know they're not aliens (they're robots). I was just using the vocab the previous poster I was responding to used.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 1 July 2012 14:44 (thirteen years ago)
I am a robot, child.
its true it was i who called them aliens cause to me they are but thats cause im a robot from mars
― lag∞n, Sunday, 1 July 2012 14:45 (thirteen years ago)
fold your hands child, you walk like a robot
― scott seward, Sunday, 1 July 2012 14:51 (thirteen years ago)
btw im sort of outraged that this awesome and necessary tom cruise thread has devolved into yet another spielberg genuflection, you people cant get enough
― lag∞n, Sunday, 1 July 2012 14:53 (thirteen years ago)
Tom Cruise.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 1 July 2012 14:57 (thirteen years ago)
cruisekat
― scott seward, Sunday, 1 July 2012 14:57 (thirteen years ago)
I wonder if we'll see Cruise in a post-Scientology world and what that will look like.
@rupertmurdoch:Watch Katie Holmes and Scientology story develop. Something creepy, maybe even evil, about these people.
― Odd Spice (Eazy), Sunday, 1 July 2012 15:08 (thirteen years ago)
lol rupert wilin on tweets today
― lag∞n, Sunday, 1 July 2012 15:10 (thirteen years ago)
Would like to see a TMZ/Scientology/Murdoch Mexican standoff.
Katie Holmes believes Scientology now views her as a threat to the organization and has put a team on her tail ... sources close to the actress tell TMZ.We're told Katie believes in recent weeks -- as the discord between her and Tom Cruise grew -- Scientology has been following her moves, especially in New York City.This does not appear to be the mind of a paranoid person. People who have photographed Katie multiple times tell TMZ there have been several "mysterious" men and vehicles around Katie's apartment and following her when she's out.Specifically ... a white Cadillac Escalade and black Mercedes SUV (see above) have been seen near Katie's NYC apartment for the past week.FYI -- there is a publication that has put a tail on Katie, but the people doing that are separate from the people Katie believes have been dispatched from Scientology.It is unclear if the two vehicles that have been constantly spotted near Holmes' pad are from Scientology or from the publication.If Katie is able to keep the divorce in New York -- where courts generally like to award sole legal custody to one parent or the other when there is conflict -- proof that she's being tailed could help her case.
We're told Katie believes in recent weeks -- as the discord between her and Tom Cruise grew -- Scientology has been following her moves, especially in New York City.
This does not appear to be the mind of a paranoid person. People who have photographed Katie multiple times tell TMZ there have been several "mysterious" men and vehicles around Katie's apartment and following her when she's out.
Specifically ... a white Cadillac Escalade and black Mercedes SUV (see above) have been seen near Katie's NYC apartment for the past week.
FYI -- there is a publication that has put a tail on Katie, but the people doing that are separate from the people Katie believes have been dispatched from Scientology.
It is unclear if the two vehicles that have been constantly spotted near Holmes' pad are from Scientology or from the publication.
If Katie is able to keep the divorce in New York -- where courts generally like to award sole legal custody to one parent or the other when there is conflict -- proof that she's being tailed could help her case.
― Odd Spice (Eazy), Sunday, 1 July 2012 15:16 (thirteen years ago)
Hahaha
People who have photographed Katie multiple times tell TMZ there have been several "mysterious" men and vehicles around Katie's apartment and following her when she's out.
Like, uh, the paparazzi?
― emil.y, Sunday, 1 July 2012 15:19 (thirteen years ago)
amazing
― lag∞n, Sunday, 1 July 2012 15:20 (thirteen years ago)
"Katie Holmes believes Scientology now views her as a threat to the organization and has put a team on her tail"
actually just dawson's creek fans...
― scott seward, Sunday, 1 July 2012 15:24 (thirteen years ago)
"i don't always photograph Katie, but when i do there have been several 'mysterious' men and vehicles around. stay clear theta clear, my friends."
― am0n, Sunday, 1 July 2012 15:59 (thirteen years ago)
wait, why aren't they aliens? and if they're alien robots, wouldn't the alien-designation take priority?
― Philip Nunez, Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:02 (thirteen years ago)
they're just super-evolved robots. David is like their long lost ancestor
― Number None, Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:05 (thirteen years ago)
― now all my posts got ship in it (dayo), Sunday, July 1, 2012 6:36 AM (2 hours ago)
otm. the ending of AI seems as though it was intended on some level to be subversive and wrenching, but spielberg and his crew work overtime to present it, instead, as a big moment of shmaltzy, redemptive uplift. it's as though SS doesn't like, understand or trust his own movie. his waffling makes nonsense out of something that really should have been devastating.
― contenderizer, Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:06 (thirteen years ago)
gonna watch WotW this week, cuz i don't remember a single scary or thrilling moment in it, and i'd like to be proven wrong. spielberg was my first favorite director.
― contenderizer, Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:08 (thirteen years ago)
wait, so the robots, they were just chilling on earth for a million years, then decided on a whim to fish the kid out of the ocean?
― Philip Nunez, Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:12 (thirteen years ago)
spielberg was my first favorite director.
Spielberg only in the last decade+ became one of mine.
― old people are made of poop (Eric H.), Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:13 (thirteen years ago)
i get the impression that they're archaeologists, and david is their latest find
― contenderizer, Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:16 (thirteen years ago)
they sensed his advanced circuitry using their advance circuitry retrieval units housed in their data bank schematic hubs. but the technology for all of this took millions of years to develop.
x-post
― scott seward, Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:16 (thirteen years ago)
the ending of AI seems as though it was intended on some level to be subversive and wrenching, but spielberg and his crew work overtime to present it, instead, as a big moment of shmaltzy, redemptive uplift
authorial intention aside (which is a pointless discussion for a movie like this) that's the point of this scene for me. I've written about this a bunch elsewhere on ILX but it's like the "uncanny valley" of happy endings--which is why it's so curiously powerful for some and so limp for others.
― ryan, Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:17 (thirteen years ago)
here's what i wrote on another thread: and that's why the final scene resonates so strongly with some people, i think: it's this constructed fantasy of a reconciliation, of becoming a "real boy" and not a robot, or of giving yourself that illusion, and so , i think, the ultimately untenability of our ultimate desires, that even if we got them we'd reject them as false.
― ryan, Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:19 (thirteen years ago)
the "uncanny valley" of happy endings
A+++ way to put it!
― old people are made of poop (Eric H.), Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:20 (thirteen years ago)
i don't get the fake marriage thing. is katie holmes gay? did she know that cruisekat was gay? is nicole kidman gay? is keith urban gay? he looks kinda gay. but he's australian so its hard to tell. paul hogan always looked kinda gay to me too. but gaydar is thrown off by the aussie/brit thing. someone could just have really nice manners. everyone in hollywood has probably ALWAYS known that john travolta was gay since he was a sweathog, right? but did his wife just go along with a marriage for the money or did she really not know? she had to have known. is will smith gay? i know jada is. and eddie murphy is famously gay, but wait he's not a scientologist. is beck gay?
i mean its not the 50's. can't you just be single and closeted? why have a big family and be so public about your perfect marriage and everything? its bizarre.
― scott seward, Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:22 (thirteen years ago)
i actually liked that robin williams robot servant movie. reminded me of AI.
― scott seward, Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:23 (thirteen years ago)
"the 'uncanny valley' of happy endings"
it is a good way to put it. still doesn't work for me. movie does seem to be saying something fascinating in spite of spielberg's best attempt to muzzle it, but despite the ideas involved, it just doesn't work for me. after the tonal mess of the second act and the missed-opportunity "real ending" (david and bear sitting underwater forever praying to the blue fairy), the far-future coda is more "interesting" than engaging.
the whole thing is a like a great movie in model kit form. here are the pieces: put them together in a way that suits you. first act is one of the best things spielberg's ever done, though.
― contenderizer, Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:29 (thirteen years ago)
^ could have used an editorial once-over, but clear enough i guess...
― contenderizer, Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:30 (thirteen years ago)
ok it's been awhile since i've seen it, but what i remember is the robaliens saying something like, "we scoured the intelligences in the universe but found something unique on earth" so these dudes evolved from earth, went out exploring, found other alien dudes, but decided home was the awesomest?
― Philip Nunez, Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:33 (thirteen years ago)
we may never know...or will we?
― scott seward, Sunday, 1 July 2012 16:40 (thirteen years ago)
― scott seward, Sunday, July 1, 2012 12:22 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
ya its weird tho tbf cruise and travolta have maybe been around long enough since its wasnt ok to be single and closeted - but its prob a weirdo scientologist thing anyway
― lag∞n, Sunday, 1 July 2012 17:50 (thirteen years ago)
is katie holmes gay? did she know that cruisekat was gay? is nicole kidman gay? is keith urban gay? he looks kinda gay. but he's australian so its hard to tell. paul hogan always looked kinda gay to me too. but gaydar is thrown off by the aussie/brit thing. someone could just have really nice manners. everyone in hollywood has probably ALWAYS known that john travolta was gay since he was a sweathog, right? but did his wife just go along with a marriage for the money or did she really not know? she had to have known. is will smith gay? i know jada is. and eddie murphy is famously gay, but wait he's not a scientologist. is beck gay?
btw Are All Actors Totally Gay
― lag∞n, Sunday, 1 July 2012 17:51 (thirteen years ago)
ya its weird tho tbf cruise and travolta have maybe been around long enough since its wasnt ok to be single and closeted
still ain't okay for american "leading men" to be gay
― contenderizer, Sunday, 1 July 2012 17:53 (thirteen years ago)
the point is it seems like a lot of trouble to got to have these families
― lag∞n, Sunday, 1 July 2012 17:54 (thirteen years ago)
jeez, you should have seen what my dad went through. don't suppose the impetus to do shit like that has gone away, especially for people in the public eye. even if they are actors...
― contenderizer, Sunday, 1 July 2012 17:58 (thirteen years ago)
there was something unsavory about the 'bonuses' structured for how many years the marriage lasted, that reminded me a lot about the way metallica made a big show of hiring their new bassist with this big novelty check for a million bucks.
― Philip Nunez, Sunday, 1 July 2012 18:08 (thirteen years ago)
marriage as a hunger game
― contenderizer, Sunday, 1 July 2012 18:09 (thirteen years ago)
Pretty sure Scient is not terribly pro-gay. I believe they clear the gay away. It even has its own wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology_and_sexual_orientation
Regardless, it is a potential career killer, or hinderer, for folks like Cruise, and can therefore be used against him as blackmail, which is Scient strategy. If Cruise is gay, though there is far more insinuation-cum-confirmation of Travolta than there is for Cruise, who exists in some sort of secretive phantom zone.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 1 July 2012 18:16 (thirteen years ago)
claims that this or that star is gay, absent solid confirmation, always strike me as an expression of homophobia as much as anything else. did you know that rod stewart had a gallon of jizz pumped out of his stomach?
― contenderizer, Sunday, 1 July 2012 18:22 (thirteen years ago)
Oh, for sure. But what solid confirmation is there beyond a public confession? Travolta is being sued by several dudes right now, which is not confirmation, and has been dogged by bath house stories, which is no confirmation, and has been more or less outed by Carrie Fisher, which is no confirmation, either. But it's a lot more than Cruise has had attached to him, or Pitt, too, at one point. Or Jeremy Renner right now.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 1 July 2012 18:45 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6G1ZDO_mNg
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 1 July 2012 18:47 (thirteen years ago)
one of the first things about john travolta's private life that i ever knew when i was a kid was that he had been in love with that woman who was in the boy in the plastic bubble and who also was gonna star in eight is enough (i think?) before she died.
― scott seward, Sunday, 1 July 2012 18:56 (thirteen years ago)
i mean, that is a LONG time to know stuff about someone's fake love life!
is keith urban gay? he looks kinda gay. but he's australian so its hard to tell.
LOL <3
― Pureed Moods (Trayce), Monday, 2 July 2012 05:29 (thirteen years ago)
i definitely understand if people think gay rumors about celebs are distasteful, but with travolta it's like katt williams' thing on whitney houston - "nobody says the same shit about you for twenty years. If a mother fucker calls you a crack head for twenty years, you are smoking crack."
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 05:36 (thirteen years ago)
yeah, i was referring more to the seemingly baseless but weirdly persistent rumors about cruise. there's good reason to suspect that travolta is gay.
― contenderizer, Monday, 2 July 2012 17:17 (thirteen years ago)
cruise is gay tho
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 17:19 (thirteen years ago)
and for the record imho its not homophobic or unseemly to speculate considering celebrities are public sex symbols
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 17:21 (thirteen years ago)
i think it's a little bit homophobic!
― goole, Monday, 2 July 2012 17:21 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.edgeboston.com/display/viewimage_story.php?id=133052
this is why people think Travolta is gay
there is no similar evidence for Cruise
― a dense custard of infinity (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:24 (thirteen years ago)
all of the evidence for Tom Cruise I've encountered is along the lines of "I have friends who have worked on movies he's been in and they all claim he hits on dudes"
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:25 (thirteen years ago)
yeah it's all hearsay and speculation
― a dense custard of infinity (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:26 (thirteen years ago)
― goole, Monday, July 2, 2012 1:21 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
it could be or it could be just wanting to know what is up w/yr fav celebrities
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 17:26 (thirteen years ago)
I have a friend who supposedly knows someone (gay) who hooked up with him on Fire Island one summer. lol. definitive proof imo.
― (✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:28 (thirteen years ago)
we cant be gifted a travolta style private jet goodbye kiss for every gay celebrity guys, sometimes we have to use our intuition and baseless rumors
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 17:29 (thirteen years ago)
otm
also
lol
― (✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:30 (thirteen years ago)
idk there's a complex of loathing and prurience about it imo.
― goole, Monday, 2 July 2012 17:31 (thirteen years ago)
sure for some but thats a preexisting condition, also loathing tom cruise shouldnt necessarily be confused w/homophobia
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 17:32 (thirteen years ago)
Re: Gay Tom, I was once told a long implausible story involving an island in Greece and a face mask
― manditory fun. day (Ówen P.), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:33 (thirteen years ago)
details now please
― (✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:33 (thirteen years ago)
I don't know if there's really a way to escape prurience when talking about the sexual orientation of anyone!
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:34 (thirteen years ago)
x-post - Although that sentence is so perfect that this might be one of those times where I prefer not to know the specifics.
― (✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:34 (thirteen years ago)
!!!
Most of the stories I remember wrt Tom being gay was back in the day when I would read my grandmother's copy of the National Enquirer, there was a lot of innuendo about Tom and wrestlers. Real greco-roman wrestling, not an affair w/Randy Savage or anything fun and WWF related.
― I found him in a Bon Ton ad (Nicole), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:35 (thirteen years ago)
Come on though, that would have been so much better.
― (✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:36 (thirteen years ago)
It would have! Imagine the forbidden love between him and the Iron Sheik.
― I found him in a Bon Ton ad (Nicole), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:37 (thirteen years ago)
― manditory fun. day (Ówen P.), Monday, July 2, 2012 1:33 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i heard one abt a facemask and an orgy for super rich people or something
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 17:37 (thirteen years ago)
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Monday, July 2, 2012 1:34 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
or in the publics relationship to celebrities in general, all part of the human experience, play through!
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 17:38 (thirteen years ago)
Real greco-roman wrestling, not an affair w/Randy Savage or anything fun and WWF related.
if you don't think that greco-roman wrestling personalities are "fun" then obv. you haven't been paying any attention to the olympic trials. god i feel sorry for people like you
― dell (del), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:39 (thirteen years ago)
there's a good use of your pity
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:39 (thirteen years ago)
Frankly, I'm amazed at the near total lockdown of Tom Cruise's (private) public life, given his level of stardom. He's practically at Malick levels of off the mapness, or Dylan, for that matter. Where does Cruise even live?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 2 July 2012 17:40 (thirteen years ago)
I imagine him living on a plane constantly circling the globe, like the rich guy in "Contact."
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 2 July 2012 17:41 (thirteen years ago)
Have you guys seen the video of him at his birthday party on the Freewinds (Sci tie cruise vessel) where he sings Old Time Rock 'n Roll? It's pretty amazing.
― (✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:43 (thirteen years ago)
Oh, it was linked in the voice articles anyway if you haven't then do yourselves a favor and watch this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSgMrrf5QzQ&feature=player_embedded
― (✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:44 (thirteen years ago)
ugh is so embarassing and cringe-inducing
that said, the split is pretty impressive
― (✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:45 (thirteen years ago)
tom is one of the most talented and beautiful actress ever!!Xwomen1234 5 days ago
tom is one of the most talented and beautiful actress ever!!
Xwomen1234 5 days ago
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:46 (thirteen years ago)
@ lagoon, lol.
The story was long and implausible and told by [a really famous actor] when I was drunk. I don't remember the details, but the fact that this even a famous actor was relating a long and implausible story involving a Greek island and a million-dollar disguisey mask suggests that wild speculation continues all the way up to the top
― manditory fun. day (Ówen P.), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:46 (thirteen years ago)
when super uptight driven people try to kickback and have some fun its best to avert yr eyes xp youtube
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 17:48 (thirteen years ago)
[a really famous actor] <<<WHO
can't believe Eugene Levy would be so reckless
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:49 (thirteen years ago)
Lot of jealousy in this comment section..Tom Cruise is awesome.. Acting (few good men, Vanilla Sky), Stunts (MI:2/3/4), Comedy (Tropic Thunder, Knight is Day) and now singing in Rock of Ages.. Judging someone by their personal life when you don't know them is idiotic.. The guys a total ledge...oneandonlyJonnySad 2 weeks ago
Lot of jealousy in this comment section..
Tom Cruise is awesome.. Acting (few good men, Vanilla Sky), Stunts (MI:2/3/4), Comedy (Tropic Thunder, Knight is Day) and now singing in Rock of Ages.. Judging someone by their personal life when you don't know them is idiotic.. The guys a total ledge...
oneandonlyJonnySad 2 weeks ago
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:50 (thirteen years ago)
lol JS, yes! He's so stiff and awkward it's just awful.
― (✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:50 (thirteen years ago)
omg a ledge
a total ledge, you guys
i had a friend who swore up and down that clooney and marky mark had been a secret couple like foreverrrr. no idea what his source was.
― goole, Monday, 2 July 2012 17:51 (thirteen years ago)
why is he always holding his hand over his forehead? He did that on Oprah to. Maybe he's got some kind of radar going on there.leahlove762 1 month ago
why is he always holding his hand over his forehead? He did that on Oprah to. Maybe he's got some kind of radar going on there.
leahlove762 1 month ago
I am falling back in love with Youtube comments
xp: lol whut
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:52 (thirteen years ago)
also eugene can do an amazing thing with an egg and a ruler xp
― manditory fun. day (Ówen P.), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:53 (thirteen years ago)
I sometimes think people treat celebrity rumors like a cross between Pokemon and Madlibs
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:55 (thirteen years ago)
Gotta (verb) them all
― manditory fun. day (Ówen P.), Monday, 2 July 2012 17:56 (thirteen years ago)
sexy pokeman and madlibs
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 17:56 (thirteen years ago)
Poor Bob Seger.
― Odd Spice (Eazy), Monday, 2 July 2012 18:04 (thirteen years ago)
God I feel sorry for people like him.
― I found him in a Bon Ton ad (Nicole), Monday, 2 July 2012 18:07 (thirteen years ago)
"and for the record imho its not homophobic or unseemly to speculate considering celebrities are public sex symbols"
this is kind of batty logic. it explains in part why people do it, but doesn't necessarily negate the unseemliness.
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:24 (thirteen years ago)
by being attractive and in movies, you are tacitly asking me to question your sexuality in a public forum
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:25 (thirteen years ago)
yes
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:26 (thirteen years ago)
does kevin spacey qualify as a public sex symbol?
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:26 (thirteen years ago)
Does this hold true for waiters/waitresses?
― Odd Spice (Eazy), Monday, 2 July 2012 18:26 (thirteen years ago)
no
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:27 (thirteen years ago)
that's what i mean by the loathing + prurience: anybody richer, more famous and prettier than me MUST be bent, just look at him, must be having ALL KINDS of crazy gay sex, i believe it all
― goole, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:28 (thirteen years ago)
well that would be asking the question Are All Actors Totally Gay
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:29 (thirteen years ago)
there's this 'key figure in anti-gay organization turns out to be gay' dynamic at work in people's fascination that's maybe not exactly morally defensible, but maybe it's karmically defensible?
― Philip Nunez, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:29 (thirteen years ago)
where mostly i think people are asking 'is this actor gay'
i want to know what happened to that big boil kevin spacey had on his neck when he was on wiseguy.
― scott seward, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:29 (thirteen years ago)
so is it karmically ok to question a scientologist's sexuality but not a unitarian's?
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:30 (thirteen years ago)
basically gossip is ugly and if you're better than that great, and feel free to shame me if i do it in front of you, but if we're all on the same world-not-helping page i got some questions about public sex symbol ryan seacrest
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:31 (thirteen years ago)
and its not like theyre above self loathing or prurience but i think we all know gays themselves are the biggest consumers of gay celebrity rumors
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:32 (thirteen years ago)
people who look down on celeb gossip make me sick. boil in hell, sicko freaks
― Black_vegeta (Hungry4Ass), Monday, 2 July 2012 18:33 (thirteen years ago)
well, and the opinions of straight people regarding who is or isn't gay are just intrinsically suspect
― contenderizer, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:33 (thirteen years ago)
i think we all know gays themselves are the biggest consumers of gay celebrity rumors
is kinda going down the "how come they get to call themselves that word and i can't" road
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:34 (thirteen years ago)
half the people i know talk about everyone else i know all the time. seems like tomkat or any other celeb should be beyond fair game. if you were above all that you wouldn't even own a computer.
― scott seward, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:34 (thirteen years ago)
i knew someone was going to bring that comparison up and i wholeheartedly reject it xp
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:34 (thirteen years ago)
i mean shit, i made my living for a couple years regurgitating rumors for a website so i'm not throwing stones, i just think most justifications are weak
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:35 (thirteen years ago)
i do think everyone would be a bit more circumspect in dishing on cruise if he were a unitarian, yeah.
― Philip Nunez, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:35 (thirteen years ago)
(xpost...) but i mean that just speaks to human envy in general
i don't think it's automatically gross if someone is wondering whether a famous male romantic lead is straight or gay or whatever offscreen
― dell (del), Monday, 2 July 2012 18:36 (thirteen years ago)
I honestly do not understand why people are bothered by his (or any other celeb's) sexuality. So what if he's gay? Or bisexual? I mean, what the fuck does it matter?
― Nathalie (stevienixed), Monday, 2 July 2012 18:36 (thirteen years ago)
celebrities were BORN to be ridiculed and speculated about. they serve that function in our society. in return they get good tables at good restaurants.
― scott seward, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:36 (thirteen years ago)
feel like celebrity gossip is p lame and discursive but not morally wrong because the celebrities themselves have opted in - they have in fact devoted tremendous energy to opting in and in most case want the attention v badly - where as someone like that lady who rush limbaugh called a slut just because she wrote an editorial is more a victim of the mass media machine
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:37 (thirteen years ago)
― Nathalie (stevienixed), Monday, July 2, 2012 2:36 PM (36 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
well its interesting from the pov of their sexuality is marketed to you in one way and occupies this particular cultural niche but actually its another way, you have been tricked but now youre untricked, and then theres just human curiosity want to know things abt people wanting to know what celebrities look like w/o their make up wanting to know how yr neighbors houe is decorated like on the inside etc
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:39 (thirteen years ago)
straight people speculating about whether or not people they don't know are gay way too often resembles a form of mockery, the identification and labeling of "faggy" or even just "weird" behavior.
― contenderizer, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:40 (thirteen years ago)
there is for sure often homophobia in the mix but its not an essential aspect of the speculation
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:41 (thirteen years ago)
lagoon, you're kind of conflating "i don't feel bad for that person being caught in a shit cycle because they put themselves in a situation where that would be a given" and "there's nothing wrong with me feeding the shit cycle"
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:42 (thirteen years ago)
well i dont blog abt it if thats what youre asking, heavens
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:43 (thirteen years ago)
it's like pretending illegally downloading music isn't shitty because the record industry is corrupt
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:44 (thirteen years ago)
Well, I agree and get it (up to a point). But honestly I don't think people are really that interested any more when it comes to Cruise. He just seems like a once popular cult victim these days.
― Nathalie (stevienixed), Monday, 2 July 2012 18:45 (thirteen years ago)
and yeah, i obv don't actually think enjoying celeb gossip is a crime per se, i just like dismantling weird "they're asking for it!" defenses.
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:45 (thirteen years ago)
― lag∞n, Monday, July 2, 2012 1:41 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
this is kinda like saying there's dirt in the water but the water itself isn't dirty
the 'celluloid closet' is a real ancient thing tho, cutting against what i've been saying
and H4A is basically right, too
― goole, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:45 (thirteen years ago)
If you're Marc Maron, substitute gay speculation with did-your-parents-make-over-80K, for similar loathing/hypocrisy reasons.
― Odd Spice (Eazy), Monday, 2 July 2012 18:46 (thirteen years ago)
geez the gay thread isn't as prurient as this one
― a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 2 July 2012 18:46 (thirteen years ago)
Also, I do think that celebrities have the option to be out of the public eye (and thus the gossip machine).
― Nathalie (stevienixed), Monday, 2 July 2012 18:46 (thirteen years ago)
― da croupier, Monday, July 2, 2012 2:45 PM (21 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i dont think youve really dismantled it tbh, they are for sure asking for it, like literally cultivating it - the shitty part abt it is more its shitty mind pollution for us the consumers of it, were doing it to ourselves! and we dont even get good tables at restaurants or sex out of it
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:48 (thirteen years ago)
i hereby christen the prurient public gaydar impulse 'pinkeye,' as in 'hey, do you think that tom cruise is gay?' 'nope, no idea, but he's definitely in the pinkeye'
― uncondensed milky way (remy bean), Monday, 2 July 2012 18:48 (thirteen years ago)
butt joke in 3, 2, ...
i like it
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:49 (thirteen years ago)
There are a couple of things unique to cruise w/r/t all this. He's not a very good actor, except when playing roles that are basically Tom Cruise, so him being confirmed as gay really changes the reading of his movie roles, probably for the better. This wouldn't work on a good actor like Ian McKellen -- his being gay doesn't turn the old Nazi from Apt Pupil gay, but it does for Cruise.
― Philip Nunez, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:49 (thirteen years ago)
they are for sure asking for it, like literally cultivating it
was kevin spacey cultivating it circa glengarry glen ross or was he not complicit until the oscar noms?
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:50 (thirteen years ago)
McKellen would have been a gangsta Boba Fett ("Put Capt. Solo up my cargo hold").
― a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 2 July 2012 18:50 (thirteen years ago)
(xp)
are we talking about the festering neck boil or his (alleged) homosexuality?
― uncondensed milky way (remy bean), Monday, 2 July 2012 18:51 (thirteen years ago)
― da croupier, Monday, July 2, 2012 2:50 PM (28 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
the moment he got a publicist
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:52 (thirteen years ago)
This wouldn't work on a good actor like Ian McKellen -- his being gay doesn't turn the old Nazi from Apt Pupil gay, but it does for Cruise.
I initially read this as "Tom Cruise thinks gay actors play gay characters exclusively"
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Monday, 2 July 2012 18:52 (thirteen years ago)
lagoon, do you actually check to see whether celebs have publicists before you question their sexuality or did you just make an arbitrary distinction that has no actual weight on whether you do that?
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:55 (thirteen years ago)
oh they all have publicists, gay publicists
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:56 (thirteen years ago)
I'd be more interested in a list of celebrities who don't have publicists
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Monday, 2 July 2012 18:56 (thirteen years ago)
well if they knew they'd have moral rights to privacy if they didn't, maybe they wouldn't!
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:57 (thirteen years ago)
they want you to be interested in their lives!
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 18:59 (thirteen years ago)
Homer Simpson: I believe that famous people have a debt to everyone. If celebrities didn't want people pawing through their garbage and saying they're gay, they shouldn't have tried to express themselves creatively. In closing, you people must realize that the public owns you for life! And when you're dead, you'll all be in commercials, dancing with vacuum cleaners.
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:02 (thirteen years ago)
the whole thing w/ celeb gossip being a huge industry and actors being the biggest celebs is just inextricably fucked to begin with. 'hey try to be convincing as this character while also being a public figure whose life is a subject of fascination to most of the people watching the movie' i mean what the hell.
― abandon al ships (some dude), Monday, 2 July 2012 19:02 (thirteen years ago)
homer otm.
― scott seward, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:03 (thirteen years ago)
p sure tom cruise has never expressed himself creatively
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:03 (thirteen years ago)
actors are the worst and most spiteful gossips alive.
― scott seward, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:04 (thirteen years ago)
show biz people in general. heartless and cruel.
― scott seward, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:05 (thirteen years ago)
and look how they're dressed
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:05 (thirteen years ago)
tom cruise employs people to get his life into us weekly, he cannot complain abt being in us weekly!
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:06 (thirteen years ago)
what's that got to do with reading it?
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:10 (thirteen years ago)
idk i dont personally read us weekly
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:10 (thirteen years ago)
you're glib, lagoon. you're glib.
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:11 (thirteen years ago)
im sry i am being glib re celebrity gayness news
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:11 (thirteen years ago)
ou don't even know what celebrity gayness is. If you start talking about chemical imbalance, you have to evaluate and read the research papers on how they came up with these theories, lagoon, okay? That's what I've done. Then you go and you say where's-- where's the medical test? Where's the blood test that says how gay a celebrity you are?
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:12 (thirteen years ago)
what are you going on about now?
― scott seward, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:12 (thirteen years ago)
its true ive studied these things
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:13 (thirteen years ago)
Because just knowing people who are gay celebrities isn't enough. You should be a little bit more responsible in knowing really--
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:13 (thirteen years ago)
if you can't ridicule tomkat who can you ridicule? its our right as americans.
― scott seward, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:14 (thirteen years ago)
I am enjoying this thread immensely
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Monday, 2 July 2012 19:15 (thirteen years ago)
Scott, here's the point. What is the ideal scene for life. Okay. Ideal scene is someone not having to announce their sexuality. Okay. So, now you look at-- and you go okay. A-- a departure from that ideal scene is a celebrity having to defend their privacy, okay. And then you go, okay. What is the theory and the science behind that, that justifies that?
You just communicate about it. And the important thing is, like you and I talk about it, whether it's -- okay, if I wanna know something, I go and find out. Because I don't talk about things that I don't understand. I'll say, you know what? I'm not so sure about that. I'll go find more information about it so I can-- I can come to an opinion based on-- on the information that I have. I'm passionate about learning. I'm passionate about life, Scott.
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:16 (thirteen years ago)
wow, i think you need to lie down. luv ya though!
― scott seward, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:17 (thirteen years ago)
dying
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Monday, 2 July 2012 19:19 (thirteen years ago)
Brilliantly done. I don't know who the Brooke Shields is in this situation though.
― I found him in a Bon Ton ad (Nicole), Monday, 2 July 2012 19:20 (thirteen years ago)
scott
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DE3bm4_Rryg
#themoreyouknow
― lag∞n, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:21 (thirteen years ago)
to match the analogy, you need someone who has publicly outed themselves and has embraced their gay identity as part of their overall public brand
with that in mind, and considering the rumor/tabloid connection, I'm gonna say... Perez Hilton
― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Monday, 2 July 2012 19:23 (thirteen years ago)
<3 croup
― abandon al ships (some dude), Monday, 2 July 2012 19:24 (thirteen years ago)
oh god i hadn't watched that video in so long. i thought anthony was really losing his mind. phew. glad he's okay.
― scott seward, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:27 (thirteen years ago)
well i'm still debating minute distinctions on the morality of celebrity gossip on a message board, so keep me in your prayers
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:30 (thirteen years ago)
lol xpost - OMG me too. well done.
― (✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Monday, 2 July 2012 19:31 (thirteen years ago)
yeah i mean i would probably agree that gossip or celebrity culture etc etc is a symptom of evil and badness in the world and all that but its low on my list of evil symptoms or whatever. a lot of it can be nasty and also be about knocking supposedly perfect people off of their pedestals, but in the end people ARE kinda nasty at times. gossip is human. speculation and morbid curiousity is human. you can choose to feed it or not. its a choice. just by not having cable television i feel like my load has been lightened. i don't see ANY of the t.v. gossip/cable news stuff anymore. haven't a clue. and i stopped buying the glossy celebs mags that i used to love. i used to buy them all. i like being out of it except for threads like this! these threads are kinda olde tyme fun for me. plus, tom cruise is a fracking idiot.
― scott seward, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:37 (thirteen years ago)
― am0n, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:38 (thirteen years ago)
;-)
― am0n, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:39 (thirteen years ago)
i have thoughts you know. deep cruise-like thoughts.
― scott seward, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:42 (thirteen years ago)
This'll all seem quaint in 20 years.
― Odd Spice (Eazy), Monday, 2 July 2012 19:45 (thirteen years ago)
people will be posting the exact same thoughts on ilx scientology threads in 20 years, nobody's attitudes will have changed one bit regardless of what happens to it.
― abandon al ships (some dude), Monday, 2 July 2012 19:47 (thirteen years ago)
― Odd Spice (Eazy), Monday, July 2, 2012 3:45 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
yes once we've all converted fully it'll seem so charming that anyone ever doubted LRH
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Monday, 2 July 2012 19:48 (thirteen years ago)
Nah, I mean that the whole Empire/Post Empire idea of celebrity identity keeps evolving, in a way that what's secret and what's not, and what's career-ending and what's not, will keep changing.
― Odd Spice (Eazy), Monday, 2 July 2012 19:49 (thirteen years ago)
I keep wondering if Cruise and Mel Gibson have spent any time together, and whether they seem similar in person in their zealotry/intensity/etc.
― Odd Spice (Eazy), Monday, 2 July 2012 19:52 (thirteen years ago)
cruise and mel had dinner back when tom was with nic and actually tom was like "omg can you guys stop talking about australia"
― da croupier, Monday, 2 July 2012 19:55 (thirteen years ago)
Tom Cruise and Mel Gibson... two total ledges
― I see you, Pineapple Teef (DJP), Monday, 2 July 2012 19:59 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPkWYTUiPTo
― abandon al ships (some dude), Monday, 2 July 2012 20:01 (thirteen years ago)
Sure, sort of like when Republicans are caught cruising bathrooms or whatever. There's also the issue (or at least an issue within some vocal sectors of the gay public) that living a lie - that is, pretending not to be gay - is more destructive than just saying none of your business, which is the line taken by, say, Queen Latifah, Kevin Spacey, Alicia Keys and until today Anderson Cooper.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 2 July 2012 20:03 (thirteen years ago)
xpost Awesome, I had been humming the bassline to that all week. My fave Rakim.
I resemble this remark!
― ledge, Monday, 2 July 2012 20:27 (thirteen years ago)
capybaras are way cuter than Tom Cruise.
^ truth bomb
― mister would you please herp my brony (Pillbox), Monday, 2 July 2012 21:01 (thirteen years ago)
hahahahahaha
― I see you, Pineapple Teef (DJP), Monday, 2 July 2012 21:16 (thirteen years ago)
― scott seward
he got lanced
― ¥╡*ٍ*╞¥ (sic), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 00:59 (thirteen years ago)
by which I mean he had hot sex with a guy named Lance
never realized how hilarious Lance is as a name.
― Misc. Carnivora (Matt P), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 01:36 (thirteen years ago)
50 years young today!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnIJxcqSKgY
― Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 05:34 (thirteen years ago)
wtf it's impossible for me to read the ending of a.i. as "schmaltzy" as opposed to deeply tragic. they revive a spectre of his "mother" for a few short moments after which she--like the entire human race--is consigned to oblivion forever. it's horrifying and puts the audience face-to-face with its own morality in way few popular (or really, any) films dare to do.
and i felt this way the first time i saw it, in the theater, and every time since. i found the movie emotionally draining from the first.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 07:44 (thirteen years ago)
anyway i think cruise feeds this by making huge shows of every major milestone in his personal life (oprah appearance to announce he had fallen in love [!] with katie holmes, selling photos of suri, etc.) -- he seems so hell-bent on advertising his normative status that i don't think it's too surprising that people get curious about the motivations behind it.
of course this could all be a vicious cycle where rumors of his homosexuality float around and that compels him to essentially promote his heterosexuality. giving rise to more rumors, etc. if he isn't gay, or even if he is, i can imagine that's a rotten circle to be trapped in.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 07:58 (thirteen years ago)
did I miss someone cluelessly parsing the end of A.I. yet again?
― Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 13:34 (thirteen years ago)
<3
― Misc. Carnivora (Matt P), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 13:52 (thirteen years ago)
uh if you're compelled to promote your heterosexuality, you are basically queer
― Misc. Carnivora (Matt P), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 13:56 (thirteen years ago)
and real talk: it's only rotten if you're homophobic
― Misc. Carnivora (Matt P), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 14:00 (thirteen years ago)
I pretty much agree with that although I think there's also a weird narcissistic streak running through Tom Cruise that muddies the waters, like it could be he promoting his heterosexuality not to fend off gay rumors but because he thinks people Want To Know. Especially in the last 5-10 years, it seems like he can't operate in the public sphere without turning into this weird freakshow spectacle (possibly because when he goes off the rails it's amazingly memorable, a la Oprah's couch or the Lauer rant).
― I see you, Pineapple Teef (DJP), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 14:11 (thirteen years ago)
tom cruise and the heterosexuals would be a good no-wave band name
― dis civilization and its contents (nakhchivan), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 14:13 (thirteen years ago)
pretty sure tom cruise is only really sexually attracted to himself
― hot sauce delivery device (mh), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 14:16 (thirteen years ago)
then he's never been happier than he was in this moment
http://images2.mtv.com/shared/promoimages/movies/movie_awards_confidential/stiller_cruise/article/281x211.jpg?width=281&height=211
― some dude, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 14:18 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXfpX5kM35w&feature=related
― scott seward, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 15:38 (thirteen years ago)
It was Becks!
Maybe. Possibly.
Not exactly Bowie and Jagger, but I guess you take your fantasy celebrity trysts where you can get them.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 17:24 (thirteen years ago)
now picturing Cruise as Frank TJ Mackey with Beckham & his squeaky little voice. yuck.
― gyac, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 18:06 (thirteen years ago)
it's true Cruise and Becks were caught in bed together, but what that rumor report leaves out is that they were playing Pillow Fort
― I see you, Pineapple Teef (DJP), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 18:07 (thirteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/MyFfz.png
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 18:50 (thirteen years ago)
― some dude, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 18:51 (thirteen years ago)
calmly walking away from exploding marriage
― am0n, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 18:56 (thirteen years ago)
COOL GUYS DON'T LOOK AT CUSTODY RIGHTS
― da croupier, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 19:05 (thirteen years ago)
david beckham is lining up behind him as we speak.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 19:22 (thirteen years ago)
hey now!
they actually make a pretty prefect couple! both annoying/rich as hell. talented at being famous. uh...annoying...oh i said that already.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 19:24 (thirteen years ago)
it's kinda creepy that Tom Cruise travelled back in time just to marry Carol Channing when she was young and hot
― your petty attempt at destroying me is laughable (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 20:43 (thirteen years ago)
^^^PLEASE let this happen so that "TomKat" can be replaced by "CruisIng"
― Race Against Rockism (Myonga Vön Bontee), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 21:07 (thirteen years ago)
watched spielberg's war of the worlds again. still don't care for it. novel here
― contenderizer, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 21:09 (thirteen years ago)
not sure what i did wrong there
www.ilxor.com/ILX/ThreadSelectedControllerServlet?showall=true&boardid=40&threadid=41161&bookmarkedmessageid=3611865
― contenderizer, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 21:10 (thirteen years ago)
Scott, Sandy is in love with JT and wants to marry him. OMG how the hell did you find that clip?
― Nathalie (stevienixed), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 21:13 (thirteen years ago)
you left off the "http://" at the beginning
― I see you, Pineapple Teef (DJP), Tuesday, 3 July 2012 21:14 (thirteen years ago)
jope
― contenderizer, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 21:17 (thirteen years ago)
Especially in the last 5-10 years, it seems like he can't operate in the public sphere without turning into this weird freakshow spectacle (possibly because when he goes off the rails it's amazingly memorable, a la Oprah's couch or the Lauer rant).
This is why he was a genius choice to play basically Axl Rose in Rock of Ages, BTW.
― Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 22:18 (thirteen years ago)
yeah, they're both pretty fuckin' passionate, man
― contenderizer, Tuesday, 3 July 2012 23:29 (thirteen years ago)
The keywords in the articles about their divorce (Tom Cruise, celebrity, California cult, Scientology, Hollywood actress, Rosemary's Baby, fear, moonchild, running for her life, scandal) evoke Sonic Youth's EVOL.
― Cunga, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 00:42 (thirteen years ago)
moonchild?
― the late great, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 00:44 (thirteen years ago)
Katie Holmes will be represented in court by attorney Kim Gordon who will recite case via spoken-word poetry monologues.
Xpost moonchild was my own touch
― Cunga, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 00:47 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1m1l00eaDg
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 00:48 (thirteen years ago)
― Cunga, Tuesday, July 3, 2012 8:42 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark
woah
― some dude, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 00:51 (thirteen years ago)
Although the Village Voices article on Scientology from a few months back touched on that. Holmes "special birthing process" or whatever was headlined on tabloids five years ago called back to Hubbard's interest in Crowley's moonchild theory.
http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2012/02/scientology_and_4.php
― Cunga, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 00:51 (thirteen years ago)
http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/nekokaiju/5496214/10395/original.jpg
almost looks like her!
― the late great, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 00:51 (thirteen years ago)
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-oc70Fl6yUdg/TWxVNkVOvRI/AAAAAAAAKUU/NJG5cfysz_I/s1600/screenshot9640.jpg
siri?
― the late great, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 00:57 (thirteen years ago)
Crowley was not impressed. He wrote to a friend in April, "Apparently Parsons or Hubbard or somebody is producing a Moonchild. I get fairly frantic when I contemplate the idiocy of these goats."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_birth
and then
Silent birth, sometimes known as quiet birth, is a birthing procedure advised by L. Ron Hubbard and advocated by Scientologists...
The "silent birth" became a source of media interest when it was known that outspoken Scientologist actor Tom Cruise and wife Katie Holmes, who converted to Scientology from Roman Catholicism, were expecting a child. Reports that the couple would follow the practice of silent birth were denied, until photos were taken of large placards being delivered to the couple's mansion bearing instructions for the silent birth, such as "Be silent and make all physical movements slow and understandable."[4]
― Cunga, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 01:06 (thirteen years ago)
that was instructions for the midwife in handling cruise tho
― snoopsheepysheep (darraghmac), Wednesday, 4 July 2012 01:06 (thirteen years ago)
he's like those goats, but instead of falling asleep he jumps a sofa when startled
― snoopsheepysheep (darraghmac), Wednesday, 4 July 2012 01:07 (thirteen years ago)
The fact that Chuck Manson was briefly involved with the church of 'tology, and how he eventually murdered Roman Polanski's pregnant wife (Rosemary's Baby redux?), is coming next on Unsolved Mysteries: The ILX Years
― Cunga, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 01:08 (thirteen years ago)
^^post is best appreciated if read in Robert Stack's voice
― Cunga, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 01:09 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v9mtaMotF4
― Fas Ro Duh (Gukbe), Wednesday, 4 July 2012 02:14 (thirteen years ago)
pumped
― Black_vegeta (Hungry4Ass), Wednesday, 4 July 2012 03:13 (thirteen years ago)
tom cruise is... padiddle
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 03:28 (thirteen years ago)
werner herzog plays the villain in this. christopher mcquarrie's first time directing in 12 years
― Black_vegeta (Hungry4Ass), Wednesday, 4 July 2012 03:31 (thirteen years ago)
i don't care if it's from a book by robert louis stevenson, jack reacher is a porn name
― da croupier, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 04:00 (thirteen years ago)
jack reacheround
"Many women are not capable of pleasure in sex and anything adverse they say or do has no effect whatever upon your pleasure. Their bodies thrill you...You have no fear if they conceive. What if they do? You do not care. Pour it into them and let fate decide..."
― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 04:18 (thirteen years ago)
ew
movie looks dumb as hell
― contenderizer, Wednesday, 4 July 2012 04:25 (thirteen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Reacher
Reacher knows how to drive although he is admittedly not a very good driver. He has never possessed a driver's license.[edit]
― goole, Thursday, 5 July 2012 13:32 (thirteen years ago)
Reacher has the uncanny ability to know what time it is
― scott seward, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:07 (thirteen years ago)
Reacher is 6' 5" tall (1.96m) with a 50-inch chest, and weighing between 210 and 250 pounds (100–115 kg).
Tom Cruise perfect casting choice
― hot sauce delivery device (mh), Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:08 (thirteen years ago)
It is also in this novel that Reacher's internal monologue reveals that he has a music collection in his head, which he listens to.
― scott seward, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:10 (thirteen years ago)
in the movie he's actually a Jamaican monster called Jah Creature
― some dude, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:10 (thirteen years ago)
xpost well, he walks on stilts, does he not?
Does he still clap his hand in this manic way? He used to do that in every single movie. Very annoying.
― Nathalie (stevienixed), Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:11 (thirteen years ago)
i watched war of the worlds last night and it was p rad
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:15 (thirteen years ago)
can u write a point-by-point rebuttal of contenderizer's essay
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:21 (thirteen years ago)
I think he just did
― I see you, Pineapple Teef (DJP), Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:22 (thirteen years ago)
although i didnt read contenderizers entire piece i get the sense that i agree w/one of his points which is that spielberg tends to me a lil too pat. like everything is so formally illustrative, even if those strokes are often masterfully applied. and spielberg acolytes can kinda come off like people who are into locating the perfect pop song.
but i came to the conclusion that its ultimately kind of a hollow complaint cause his movies are so good whats the point of wanting them to be some other thing.
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:34 (thirteen years ago)
lol I kind of hate Spielberg's movies but I still give you the points
― hot sauce delivery device (mh), Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:42 (thirteen years ago)
except for ai the end of ai is dumb no matter what anyone says
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:44 (thirteen years ago)
iirc i agree but i havent seen it in forever
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:45 (thirteen years ago)
i went to the movies once on a v hot day and saw pootie tang the fast and the furious and ai, in that order
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:47 (thirteen years ago)
somewhere morbs just had a dizzy spell
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:48 (thirteen years ago)
that is a sick triple-bill, lot of variety + all good movies
― max, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:49 (thirteen years ago)
just chop the last 20 minutes off any spielberg film, makes it twice as good
― hot sauce delivery device (mh), Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:49 (thirteen years ago)
or leave early to go see part of pootie tang again
― hot sauce delivery device (mh), Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:50 (thirteen years ago)
that should just be one film edited together. "pootie tang the fast and the furious and ai"
― am0n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:50 (thirteen years ago)
that's a great triple bill
lol xp
― goole, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:50 (thirteen years ago)
incorrect! last scene of raiders. close encounters. etc xxxp
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:51 (thirteen years ago)
2001 was the golden age of movies
― max, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:51 (thirteen years ago)
ya it was a v auspicious selection
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:52 (thirteen years ago)
ok, any spielberg from 1995-onward? idk, not going to look up the cutoff line. probably everything post-schindler's list where they all come out and hug schindler at the end
― hot sauce delivery device (mh), Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:52 (thirteen years ago)
"pootie tang the fast and the furious and ai 2: joe dirt"
― am0n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:53 (thirteen years ago)
worst thing abt WotW was magically resurrecting the son at the end, but the ending was so dull & schmaltzy overall that it hardly seemed worth a mention
― contenderizer, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:53 (thirteen years ago)
the end of munich wasnt super corny was it
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:54 (thirteen years ago)
pootie tang the fast and the furious and aii laughed i cried it was better than cats
― goole, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:57 (thirteen years ago)
― lag∞n, Thursday, July 5, 2012 10:54 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
it had that shot of the twin towers which was a bit do u SEE
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:58 (thirteen years ago)
(to use an old ilx expresh)
ha i have zero recollection of that
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:58 (thirteen years ago)
oh god I never watched munich and now I don't need to
― hot sauce delivery device (mh), Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:59 (thirteen years ago)
munich is vv good!
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:59 (thirteen years ago)
munich is pretty amazing
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 July 2012 14:59 (thirteen years ago)
SPOILERS please
― max, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:00 (thirteen years ago)
its kinda one for the haters, p hardcore
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:00 (thirteen years ago)
9/11 happened
― funny-skrillex-bee_132455836669.gif (s1ocki), Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:00 (thirteen years ago)
xp
with you two endorsing it, all I need is morbs popping in to say he didn't watch it and it'd be an obvious must-see
― hot sauce delivery device (mh), Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:00 (thirteen years ago)
ha
Minority Report ended around the 110 minute mark iirc.
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:03 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah, Munich has a brutality that doesn't even show up in Schindler's List, but it's not the kind of sophomoric nastiness of The Lost World. It's some down and dirty shit.
― Julie Derpy (Phil D.), Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:04 (thirteen years ago)
That scene with the woman on the houseboat, it's like . . . this is a SPIELBERG MOVIE?
― Julie Derpy (Phil D.), Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:05 (thirteen years ago)
SPOILERBERG
― am0n, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:07 (thirteen years ago)
i haven't seen munich either. i should watch it.
― scott seward, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:21 (thirteen years ago)
i couldn't bring myself to watch where to find nike shoes america what a country airport movie either. big meets perfect strangers.
― scott seward, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:25 (thirteen years ago)
definitely not the latter
― Number None, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:26 (thirteen years ago)
xp That's Born on the Fourth of July, yeah?
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:27 (thirteen years ago)
― scott seward, Thursday, July 5, 2012 11:25 AM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark
― some dude, Thursday, 5 July 2012 15:32 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/13682440-421/tom-cruise-katie-holmes-reach-a-settlement-in-divorce-case.html
― Odd Spice (Eazy), Monday, 9 July 2012 20:13 (thirteen years ago)
damage contrlolz
― jed_, Monday, 9 July 2012 20:15 (thirteen years ago)
Cruise missile: dodged.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 9 July 2012 21:10 (thirteen years ago)
http://oi49.tinypic.com/35aolxw.jpg
― am0n, Monday, 9 July 2012 21:10 (thirteen years ago)
jann wenner choosing sides
― du. duplass. duplass mich. (goole), Monday, 9 July 2012 21:11 (thirteen years ago)
I thought that screamed "EUNUCH!
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 9 July 2012 21:16 (thirteen years ago)
Trashed! Katie Holmes and Suri's Car Sideswiped by Garbage Truck
― am0n, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 14:22 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.theonion.com/articles/katie-holmes-glad-she-can-finally-practice-sciento,28780/
― am0n, Wednesday, 18 July 2012 14:17 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gRmhw8z73
couldn't physically make myself get through to even hear him speak
― goole, Tuesday, 11 June 2013 18:14 (thirteen years ago)
love tom walmart!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=0gRmhw8z73w
― scott seward, Tuesday, 11 June 2013 18:32 (thirteen years ago)
WHY DOES OBLIVION NICK SO MUCH FROM MOON AND MASS EFFECT?!?!!?!?!?
― Hockey Drunk (kingfish), Thursday, 20 June 2013 07:01 (twelve years ago)
are people talking about edge of tomorrow anywhere? not bad, clever enough, some imaginative aliens (though i have no idea why they were called 'mimics')
not as clever or as moving as "source code" tho
(it felt too smarmy to revive a groundhog day thread to talk about it, so here we are...)
― goole, Monday, 9 June 2014 18:03 (twelve years ago)
He was on the Nerdist podcast last week, heh
― polyphonic, Monday, 9 June 2014 18:13 (twelve years ago)
fuck, bill paxton killed it in this. cruise cowardly straying from the outfit early on, w/mech suit weighing him down was pretty lol.
― braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 02:46 (twelve years ago)
hit the same easy summer sweet spot as oblivion did last year, though this was probably better. i cant even come up with a bad explanation for the end tho, let alone a good one
emily blunt was really good. she should get an action franchise herself as the angel of verdun, id watch 3-4 movies of her in an exosuit killing tentacles with that big anime sword
― max, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 11:29 (twelve years ago)
The end was dumb but this was probably my favorite Cruise movie since War of the Worlds.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 12:37 (twelve years ago)
this was good
but as soon as the groundhog day gimmick is over, it just becomes an ok-ish action movie
they blew it by ending that part too early
― socki (s1ocki), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 03:00 (eleven years ago)
it was great imo
― local eire man (darraghmac), Monday, 27 October 2014 12:29 (eleven years ago)