The obligatory lesbian scene

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Why does most otherwise heterosexual pr0n contain at least one scene involving two women getting it on like gangbusters? (Yes, I know there are some obvious answers to this one but really I find the entire phenomenon amusing.)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)

For a minute, I thought this was gonna be C-Man announcing he also re-watched Tipping The Velvet last night.

R.I.M.A. (Barima), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 13:33 (twenty-one years ago)

PWNED

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 13:34 (twenty-one years ago)

You don't want to mess with the Fake-Dykester Union.

Huck, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 13:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Yay! (x-post)

R.I.M.A. (Barima), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 13:42 (twenty-one years ago)

When I clicked on this I thought it was gonna be about the fact that, these days, almost every high-profile Hollywood actress has lezzed up in at least one movie.

re: the question...because most men enjoy lesbian sex scenes, but for most of them it's just a minor kink, not something they wanna see an entire movie of?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 13:43 (twenty-one years ago)

they should have a token gay sex scene in every porn movie instead! (70's erotic movies often feature homosexual charcters as comic relief; they usually get cured of their evil sodomite ways at some point during the flick. Meanwhile the lezzing up happens often and w/o anyone finding it offensive.)

I only enjoy watching exclusively lesbian movies anyway (too much information, I know); the lesbian scenes in straight porn are almost always pretty dire (gangbusters is right!)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 13:47 (twenty-one years ago)

When I clicked on this I thought it was gonna be about the fact that, these days, almost every high-profile Hollywood actress has lezzed up in at least one movie.

(Dan, that's a much more interesting topic; let's run with it.)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe "lesbian" should be in quotes?

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm still at a loss wondering what pearls of unexpected wisdom Dan was really after with this thread.

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 13:51 (twenty-one years ago)

"pearls"

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 13:52 (twenty-one years ago)

"D-Mang"

R.I.M.A. (Barima), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:00 (twenty-one years ago)

TS: Answering the question with something more complex than "men be liking the boobies!" and turning it into a complex discussion about male sexuality vs Spurious prejudgement on a poster's motives that's following a trend and becoming really fucking tiresome

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:06 (twenty-one years ago)

In answer to the original question: I know I'd prefer to watch two hott ladeez onscreen, rather than hott lady plus hairy bobbing man-ass.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it's because there's a growing number of lady actresses who will only do "girl-girl" scenes. Or they feel more comfortable doing a "girl-girl" scene. And hey, nothing to clean up!

Huck, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually Mark, until you apologize for that thread on the moderator board, feel free to go fuck yourself and stop responding to my posts. Okay, thanks.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:09 (twenty-one years ago)

And hey, nothing to clean up!

uh, what?

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Because men are pigs and always leave half-eaten sandwichs on set.

Huck, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe it's all about cultural assimilation and it (lesbians, lesbian sex) becoming the norm, albeit of a gratuitous sort, and so forth (this is inspired by Mutya Sugababe defending the nipples that appear in the new vid). I'd try to explain further, but my lunch break's just about over.

R.I.M.A. (Barima), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)

(Dan, that's a much more interesting topic; let's run with it.)

Cameron Diaz, Lucy Liu, Calista Flockhart, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Neve Campbell, Meg Ryan, Nicole Kidman, Mena Suvari, Drew Barrymore, Liv Tyler, Winona Ryder, Brittany Murphy, Selma Blair, Kate Hudson, Chrsitina Ricci, Jennifer Aniston, Rebecca Romijn Stamos, Angelina Jolie, the list goes on and on...it's quite stunning when you think about it.

I'm not against it, for obvious reasons, but I am quite aware that in most of the cases it's pandering on a very clear level...you get to perv on hawt girl-on-girl action and fancy yourself a Gay Rights Activist at the same time (wonder how much of "The L Word"'s core viewership are straight males?)

Stating the obvious, I don't think you could come up with a similairly long list of homosexual actors who've played gay roles.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)

wonder how much of "The L Word"'s core viewership are completely hard of hearing and don't bother with closed captioning. the writing on that show is exceptionally excruciating. I've got half a mind to stop watching it.

Huck, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

err, "a similarly long list of high-profile actors who've played gay roles", that is, not homosexual actors. Obviously.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

haha yeah, Huck, it really is some sort of nadir for that type of show.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Apologise? Dan, you misunderstand, it's you who needs to apologise. And I'll respond to what I like, thanks.

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:19 (twenty-one years ago)

to quote myself:

anyway, more broadly, I'm inclined to think the 'lesbian thing' in porn, while seeminly harmless, is based on a rather nasty set of problems. I hate to quote Bill Maher -- "[men] agree with both of them" -- but I think he's more or less otm.

theory: porn-lesbianism is a way of creating women who think and fuck not like real actual lesbians but like men... there's no possibility for male EMPATHY (secret currency of porn) with the women bcz all they want to do is FUCK MEN (ew gay ew!) so, w lesbo pR0n, male viewer is allowed to think: "impossibly remote and unlike-any-woman-I-know overdone and enhanced blonde, on this we can FINALLY UNDERSTAND each other: we both want to fuck the overdone and enhanced brunette"

-- g--ff c-nn-n (misterhungr...), September 7th, 2003 11:32 AM.

from here:

Why do men fetishize lesbians?

g--ff (gcannon), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I find the mainstream "it's okay to be kind of lesbian" thing really odd, particularly when you look at what it's like for lesbians in real life. When did women sleeping with women become analagous to getting a tattoo?

Male sexuality MUST be more complex than "Two breasts good/FOUR BREASTS AWESOME" otherwise I'm going to go drown myself.

(xpost: Who started namecalling threads, you massive self-important tool?)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)

You arrogant fuck. Okay, I do apologise for starting that thread - I was WORRIED about you, believe it or not. But I'm not any more. Looks like I'll have to accept what you've become.

(how long have you been building up this resentment? What did I do to piss you off *before* that thread? Cos it seems to have exploded from nowhere. Evidently I'm a bad judge of who my friends are)

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost oh crap - Dan I think it's a "oh YES this woman is sleazy in the same way I am - except she doesn't sleep with other men." Which is kinda dumb, but there you go.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)

It's part sleaze, part fascination and part undefinable arousal (or "Two breasts good/FOUR BREASTS AWESOME").

OK, OK, I'm going.

R.I.M.A. (Barima), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Apology accepted, regardless of how deeply insincere it is.

And for the record, saying "What kind of sick fuck starts a thread like this?" is not really a great way of:

a) showing that you like or respect someone
b) showing that you're worried about someone
c) making the person you're talking about think you're really interested in anything but unprovoked character assassination

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:31 (twenty-one years ago)

boy, of all the days to not bring my copy of HARDCORE to work!

g--ff (gcannon), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Hmm, you're right. It's not an insincere apology, because I DO like you and I'm upset. And it was an aggressive way to respond to a thread. I think the pot/kettle drawing might have to make a reappearance.

Sorry, Dan.

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I think most male porn aficianados would be shocked if they ever saw real lesbian sex.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Okay, I've calmed down somewhat. This thread was possibly not the place to kick all of that off again. I'm sorry for that.

I didn't have any resentment towards you which factored very heavily into the massively negative reaction I had to the moderator board thread.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:41 (twenty-one years ago)

This may be somewhat obvious, but there's a kind of virgin/whore thing going on with male attraction to lesbian sex - we get to see them all naked and sexin' it up, but no penetration (at least in softcore porn/mainstream films) and no semen makes it somewhat "clean"/virginal/innocent. We get to see a sexual side of the women without them being "sluts."

n.a. (Nick A.), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:42 (twenty-one years ago)

yes, there is a certain air of lesbian sex "not counting" somehow

g--ff (gcannon), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:44 (twenty-one years ago)

There's no threatening "other" wang, too.

Huck, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

There are certain types of sex that I can see as "not counting" (for example: clothed frottage/dry humping) but actual flesh-to-flesh contact has to count, doesn't it?

All of my previous ILX joking aside, it is seriously depressing to think that male sexuality is that easy to figure out. Only I don't know why I care. (Actually I do know why but it's really sad and stupid so I'm pretending I don't.)

(xpost: Ha, I like the implication that gay scenes between guys with tiny penises would be okay.)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)

g--ff, I think you're partly otm, as far as mainstream token lesbian scenes go: I mean, the girls are mostly very male-ish in their approach to sex in the lesbian scenes, too. But I also think that there's more to it than just that: the taboo thing factors in, obviously...same-sex lurvin' is still very stygmatised (sp?), and the "forbidden" is always a turn-on...of course, it's tokenised because the viewer only wants to play with this taboo, not embrace it fully (he wants to fantasize about gurls who do naughty things with gurls, *not* gurls who are interested in sex and relationships *only* with gurls.) And then of course, in some cases, the nympho implications (perhaps the most despicable reasoning of them all - wow, she even fucks women, she must be really gagging for it!)

With all lesbian movies it's a different sort of thing: I mean, it's a common argument from ppl who watch that sort of stuff that the male body is *simply a turn-off*. I share that view, too. I guess on some level it has to have to do with a certain amount of sexual insecurity, a certain level of prudishness even? Plus the fact that male porn stars are almost always portrayed as macho jerks doesn't exactly help, in my experience.

Mind you, as always with this stuff there's a gigantic level of variety and it's unfair to dump it all in the same category. I mean, I've seen some lesbian porn that was just hateful, stupid shit, and some that (as far as this is possible in the medium) were actually quite inoffensive (as far as that is possible in this medium); I mean, of course I rationalize this stuff, otherwise I'd be wallowing in self-loathing, but I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that, at its best, the male infatuation with lesbianism can contribute to helping them understand feminine sensibilities, as opposed to trying to transform them into male ones.

Hahaha, of course this is all from a total het viewpoint, but then that's what the great majority of this stuff seems to be geared towards.

tons and tons of xposts

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh come on, if male sexuality wasn't the saddest non-mystery in the whole history of the world there wouldn't be a human race left. Embrace it.

Huck, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Variety is the spice of life, so maybe with lesbian scenes you have twice as much to look at, including different shaped and sized bodies?

(obviously identical twin porn would be the exception that proves the rule)

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Of course, there's not a lot of variety in mainstream porn, all the actresses are pretty samey.

Huck, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)

hahaha, notice how my ph34r of offending someone by defending my pervy ways has made me post "(as far as this is possible in the medium)" twice.

This may be somewhat obvious, but there's a kind of virgin/whore thing going on with male attraction to lesbian sex - we get to see them all naked and sexin' it up, but no penetration (at least in softcore porn/mainstream films) and no semen makes it somewhat "clean"/virginal/innocent. We get to see a sexual side of the women without them being "sluts."

Yup, this OTM also. Mind you, when most of the rest of the porn one is exposed to is "ANAL SLUTS LUV IT WHORES GIANT COCK CUNT CUM HOORAY!" type stuff, it feels like a kind of healthy reaction, almost.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Ok, "Queer Eye For The Straight Guy" exists, how much longer until heterosexual women perving on gay sex gets the same matter-of-fact treatment that heterosexual men perving on lesbian sex does?

(answer: oh, just about a century or two, probably.)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the "women are complicated and men are simple and sad" is a tired cliché and not really true. I don't have anything too inspiring to say about the appeal of lesbian porn except to say that I'm mostly not terribly interested in seeing naked men, so the lesbian fantasy probably plays into that. As a male user of porn, you are psychologically a voyeur, maybe that's the crux of it.

And what about one female equivalent of the genre, which might be the women who write and read slash, which focuses on gay male sex/relationships?

Bela Lugosi's Dad, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Everything in porn is driven by hard economics.

Huck, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)

That's another thing that bothers me about het porn and its appeals to male sexuality; what is appealing about watching a man orgasm (particularly on someone's face)???

(I fully acknowledge that looking at porn to find representation of a "respectful" sexual relationship is not necessarily going into a situation with realistic expectations.)

Also, while I do take on board the "virgin/whore" argument as valid, a large part of me is scoffing at some of the multiple girl pile scenes I've seen and reconciling those scenes with that argument.

(xpost Dan, that day is now; most of the viewers of "Queer As Folk" I know are straight women.)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:14 (twenty-one years ago)

The male orgasm is an essential part of het sex - perhaps without it it's somehow unsatisfying - like chewing some tasty food but not swallowing?

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I understand, but when did it become essential that the male orgasm goes in the left eye? Was there a memo I missed?

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:19 (twenty-one years ago)

well the trend in porn since prolly mid-90s is about this whole degredation thing - I mean, aside from just how degrading porn in in general.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

(I fully acknowledge that looking at porn to find representation of a "respectful" sexual relationship is not necessarily going into a situation with realistic expectations.)

True, but just because it isn't doesn't mean that it shouldn't be, or that it's not something worth working towards.

Yeah, "Queer Eye For The Straight Guy", "Queer As Folk", "Will & Grace", etc - but I don't think that those are comparable to the male thing about lesbians, they might be the first steps towards that but it's hardly as prevalent and nonchalant. Sort of asexual, too (well, two out of those three shows are.) Of course that was a trick question, as it basically boils down to "when will porn (and society in general) cater to the whims and desires, sexual or otherwise, of women as much as it does for men?"

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)

It's the pushing of the envelope. As porn becomes more accepted in the mainstream, it has to push further to be transgressively arousing. This phenomenon has been very detrimental in k!dd!e porn.

xpost

Huck, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Er, not that ch!ld p0rn has been accepted, but it's become much easier to access, via electronic means, and therefore, in the eyes of its users, "normalized" to an extent.

Huck, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't wanna know.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:26 (twenty-one years ago)

This story was featured in this year's Best American Crime Writing anthology.

http://www.newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/crimelaw/features/n_8815/

Huck, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)

"...as it basically boils down to "when will porn (and society in general) cater to the whims and desires, sexual or otherwise, of women as much as it does for men?" "

That's assuming that any medium of sexual stimulation *can* be made to equally cater to men's and women's sexual whims. You might as well say: "when will prostitution cater to the whims and desires of women as much as for men?" The answer: probably never, because women don't seem so interested in the very idea of using prostitutes to satiate sexual desire. Maybe the male ability to compartmentalize sex more easily than women means it's simply harder to "commercialize" female sexual desire.

Bela Lugosi's Dad, Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Not many of these reasons make sense to me, I'm afraid, but I guess I'm an odd one out sexually in many ways. A few of the women I've known best have been as stimulated by watching two men fuck as so many men are by watching two women fuck (I have been an enthusiastic participant in both scenarios, as you probably know). There are porn videos with bi men, but they are marketed as an exception, not as the norm, of course.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it boils down to the major porn market being straight men, and therefore you give them extra women. Women do watch and like porn, but not in the same numbers, so far at least.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:49 (twenty-one years ago)

To anyone who's interested: read Angela Carter's The Sadeian Woman and the Ideology of Pornography. It's excellent.

Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:51 (twenty-one years ago)

That's assuming that any medium of sexual stimulation *can* be made to equally cater to men's and women's sexual whims. You might as well say: "when will prostitution cater to the whims and desires of women as much as for men?" The answer: probably never, because women don't seem so interested in the very idea of using prostitutes to satiate sexual desire. Maybe the male ability to compartmentalize sex more easily than women means it's simply harder to "commercialize" female sexual desire.

That's a chicken and egg type of question, tho - does porn not cater to women because they don't enjoy it, or do they not enjoy it because it doesn't cater to them? But that's a different discussion, I'd say.

xpost Jeanne will do!

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:59 (twenty-one years ago)

"Jeanne will do"? She's better than that! Make her feels special, dammit!

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)

ALCAZARIZED!!! :(

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Hahaha "Porn Aficionado," oh my God, someone needs to start a magazine called that. It would be like a different celebrity on the cover each month, with a stack of porn, smirking.

"Dear Reader -

Do you get cold looks at four-star restaurants when you pull out Hustler's June centerfold over a 12-year-old post-prandial cognac? Then this magazine is for you."

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)

So this has become "why do men get turned on by watching two women have sex?" instead of "why does every porno have a 'lesbian' scene?", right?

By a woman being with another woman (assuming she's bi and not totally homosexual), it lets me know that that woman REALLY likes sexual pleasure. She's willing to do something relatively taboo (compared to hetero sex) and is sexually imaginative, ie she can get off in more ways than one.
And, of course, it's step one in getting her to engage in a threesome.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)

http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/2004/08/24/sports/olympics/24cnd-beach.2.184.jpg

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)

(Isn't question #1 implied by question #2, oops?)

- How do you reconcile the "virgin/whore" argument with the "she's REALLY into sexual pleasure" argument?
- This argument doesn't work the other way for women, does it? Are women turned on by bisexual men becausetheir sexual boundaries are "broader" and they might get a threesome?

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 19:36 (twenty-one years ago)

The "She's really into pleasure" thing is the whore part of the virgin/whore dichotomy. She's really into pleasure, but she's not a slut because she hasn't had massive numbers of dicks inside her.

n.a. (Nick A.), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 19:52 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah ?#1 is implied by #2. I meant to say that. But the answer to the two is different. I think each movie has this scene for variety's sake, mainly. There's only so much (non-fetish, non-totally raunchy) male-female sex situations you can do within the premise of a single film before your audience's wang gets completely bored.

I don't know if I agree with the virgin/whore thing w/r/t porn cause HELLO they're in a porno flick. The virgin part of the equation is pretty much flies outta the window from the first frame.

I think my argument can work the other way and somewhat explain why some women dig bisexual male action, but I'm, like, not a woman so maybe we should get one of them here to back me up.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't get the "she's really into pleasure" thing. Is a gay person "really into pleasure" because they're fucking ppl of the same gender despite the taboo factor? Yeah, the bi girl would still have the option of just having sex with men and getting pleasure from that, but isn't denying one's bisexuality just as painful as denying one's sexuality if you're gay/straight? Ok, granted, the non-sexual factors that would make concealing one's bisexuality painful in real life (love) aren't usually adressed much in porn, but I still can't immdeiatley draw the same conclusion as oops does.

- How do you reconcile the "virgin/whore" argument with the "she's REALLY into sexual pleasure" argument?

Not talking about this specific argument, but maybe it's worth pointing out that diferent men find lesbian sex scenes attractive for diferent reasons, some of which contradict each other. Jus' sayin'.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:19 (twenty-one years ago)

quoting myself here: By a woman being with another woman (assuming she's bi and not totally homosexual), it lets me know that that woman REALLY likes sexual pleasure.

note the part in parentheses.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)

The virgin/whore argument was really focused more on the mainstreaming of lesbianism (i.e., in non-porn and softcore porn films).

n.a. (Nick A.), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:23 (twenty-one years ago)

b-b-b-ut oops, I read the part in parentheses! That was exactly the point that I was adressing in my last post: indulging in one's bisexuality isn't really being more interested in sexual pleasure that having sex with ppl of the opposite gender is when you're straight or of the same gender is when you're gay.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:24 (twenty-one years ago)

It perhaps implies more breadth of interest, if not more quantity, and I think many of us would find that an appealing quality.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:26 (twenty-one years ago)

hahaha men like bi girls cos they're bi, whoa!

I do understand why a promiscous bisexual woman would be more of a turn-on than a promiscous heterosexual woman to yr average straight male, but I think that the promiscous part is where "she REALLY likes sexual pleasure" comes from, not the bisexual one.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:31 (twenty-one years ago)

it didn't seem like you had read that part, judging from the first question in that post.
indulging in one's bisexuality isn't really being more interested in sexual pleasure that having sex with ppl of the opposite gender is when you're straight or of the same gender is when you're gay.

There are multiple reasons for engaging in bisexual activities. You seem to be saying that people just *are* bi-sexual, in the same way that someone just *is* diabetic. The true nature of bisexuality is really beside the point here, anyway. The question here is about the mind of the heterosexual male and how he views things, why he's turned on by certain things. To me, a male viewer of porn, a woman engaging in bisexual acts signals that she loves sexual pleasure, and obv that is quite a turn on.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:32 (twenty-one years ago)

As a lesbian, I have to tell you that typical p0rn that includes a woman-on-woman scene generally does very little for me. I've only seen a handful (haw haw okay shut up) of faux-lesbo scenes that I actually enjoyed. Huge-haired bimbos knockin' their mammoth tits together and moaning never lit my fire.

Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:33 (twenty-one years ago)

hence "lesbian" in quotes.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I do understand why a promiscous bisexual woman would be more of a turn-on than a promiscous heterosexual woman to yr average straight male, but I think that the promiscous part is where "she REALLY likes sexual pleasure" comes from, not the bisexual one.

That doesn't make any sense. Both are promiscuous. The difference between the two is that one is bisexual, and therefore any difference in their sexual allure should be attributed to that difference.

xpost Jeanne OTM. Most of the scenes don't do anything for me either. However, if done right...

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:36 (twenty-one years ago)

it's weird that we're scrutinizing this issue this much from the "performer" point-of-view, since, y'know, what a pornstar does is not really indicative of any real meaning of their "true" sexuality.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:40 (twenty-one years ago)

uhm, well, yes, I do think that people just *are* bisexual, just like they just *are* straight or gay. But now I remember that you have rather different viewpoints on that subject, which if I recall correctly lead to much hijinks on some thread many moons ago, so I can see how you would see things differently. My male mind doesn't scream "wow, she's REALLY into sex" at any mention of bisexuality in porn, but yeah, our views on sexuality are so fundamentally different that it's no wonder we would draw diferent implications from porn. Sorry, I'd just forgotten about that.

xpost oops "sexual allure" wtf? I just said that I can see why a promiscous bisexual woman could be seen as more attractive; you were claiming bisexuality as an indication that the woman's really into sex. The two factors are not the same thing.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Jeanne I think a large part of the problem is that most women in pr0n aren't attractive, therefore watching a whole bunch of them writhing together in a manner that looks painful is not going to be very stimulating.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:43 (twenty-one years ago)

well yeah Dan plus faux-lesbian sex is probably not appealing to real lesbians.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I took that as read.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't speak for the real lesbians, only the faux ones?

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:45 (twenty-one years ago)

heh, kidding. Anyway...

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:45 (twenty-one years ago)

fine. replace "sexual allure" with "turn-on factor" or whatever you like.

I don't think you or anyone else here really know what my viewpoints on the matter are, so kindly do not make assumptions. However, I don't think any absolute statement (such as the one you made, ie they just *are*) accurately describes every person who engages in homo or bisexual acts.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:46 (twenty-one years ago)

(the word "faux" always brings to mind the word "fur", which in this context turned into "furries" which almost led to the worst Google Image search ever)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)

hahahaha I hope you don't get fired, Dan. Wait, fired, in a deep Southern drawl, could sound like fur...

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:49 (twenty-one years ago)

well, you seemed to be quite outspoken about those views, but nevermind. "She's bi and has sex with ppl of both genders = she REALLY likes sex" still feels like a pretty odd statement to me; the fact that she's having sex with various members of both genders during the movie is what makes that explicit, not the bisexuality per se; does your male mind REALLY think every bisexual person is REALLY into sex?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:53 (twenty-one years ago)

but, y'know, this is splitting hairs, sorry about being so catty about it. Off to watch avante-garde disaster "Hotel"...

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Saying bisexuals like to fuck more than straight people like to fuck is not absolute truth by any stretch.

Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 20:59 (twenty-one years ago)

No, I don't really have strong views. The outspokeness was more on those who felt the need to put me in my place.
Of course I don't think every bisexual person is really into sex. We're talking about "the obligatory lesbian scene" in film and why men are turned on by bisexuality. This discussion has little if anything to do with reality, and everything to do with male fantasy.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 21:05 (twenty-one years ago)

However, the women I have personally known who have engaged in bisexual acts have had higher-than-average sex drives and REALLY liked sex, so a bit of personal bias may be at work there. I am not trying to speak all bisexuals for or define bisexuality, only giving my personal thoughts. ILE would function better if people kept this in mind.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 21:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Isn't it really some sophomoric fantasy about two gals so horny that they'd fuck each other (implying a certain sexual adventuresomeness) and then the voyeur comes in (no pun intended) to save the day? It's cliched and almost cute but I can't say I find it any more offensive than most people's improbable fantasies.

Michael White (Hereward), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 21:10 (twenty-one years ago)

However, the women I have personally known who have engaged in bisexual acts have had higher-than-average sex drives and REALLY liked sex, so a bit of personal bias may be at work there.

I don't know if there are many women that I have personally known who have not engaged in at least one 'bisexual' act - no matter what orientation they profess now.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 22:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I didn't actually go to the movie: got high and watched a downloaded episode of "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles" instead. That Michaelangelo, he's such a joker.

those who felt the need to put me in my place.

Haha, dude, I wasn't trying to put you in your place (in fact, I don't think I even know my place! HAW!); I just thought your comment was kinda odd and decided to enagage in some spirited debating. Or maybe the weed's fucking with my short term memory, and I really was being an awful, awful asshole - it happens sometimes. In any case, peace d00d. *hugglez*

hstencil, can the same statement be applied to your male acquaintances? I mean, I live in a severely homophobic place, so that kinda situation is very alien to me. Have heard stuff from my scandinavian friend, tho.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 22:52 (twenty-one years ago)

no, it can't be, which is kinda the point.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 22:53 (twenty-one years ago)

they should have a token gay sex scene in every porn movie instead!

Yeah! Because lesbians aren't gay.

Sexual Air Supply (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 22:56 (twenty-one years ago)

My mum complained the other day that there's no actual non-derrogatory word for male homosexuals.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 22:59 (twenty-one years ago)

what?

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 22:59 (twenty-one years ago)

as in, a female homosexual is a lesbian. "Homosexual" and "gay" (the non-offensive terms used for male homosexuals) aren't specific to the male gender.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 23:02 (twenty-one years ago)

oh wait, I misread what you wrote.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 23:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Jeanne if you don't mind me asking what are pornos made by and for lesbians like compared to these Faux-Lez scenes?
I know these exist but I've never seen one.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 23:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha, dude, I wasn't trying to put you in your place

Oh I wasn't referring to you. Don't worry bout it.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 23:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't really see the oddness in what I said, but I guess I wouldn't.
The "bisexual" women that I have known have all preferred relationships with men, and fuck women as a hobby, more or less (IOW, it's what they do , not who they are). Because a) they find women attractive and b) they are friggin horndogs. Thus, when the turn-on factor for me personally in imaging any girl I'm interested in (getting away from the thread topic of lesbian scenes in videos, cause that really doesn't do much for me. unless of course I personally knew one or both of the women) being with another woman comes down to this.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 23:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't know where that "when" came from in that last sentence.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 24 August 2004 23:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Aaron, the very little lez p0rn I've seen consisted of at least one radical-looking dyke (shaved head, piercings, etc.) and one not-so-lipstick lez. Or one stomping butch and an indie girl. Or some kind of subcultural combo. Honestly, I haven't seen that much lez-for-lez p0rn so I really can't judge it that well. But I can say that I don't think straight guys would dig what I've seen.

Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Wednesday, 25 August 2004 15:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I predict that ILXor Lezzing Up On Camera would be an international porn smash hit.

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 25 August 2004 16:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Stomping butch and an indie girl actually sounds kinda hot to me Jeanne, but I'm twisted. Was the sex different? Was there like fisting and stuff?

AaronHz (AaronHz), Wednesday, 25 August 2004 20:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Can anyone explain to me why fisting is so associated with gay men and women? Do they have like different bodies or something?

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 25 August 2004 22:03 (twenty-one years ago)

do i recall someone asking upthread if women would watch more porn if it catered to their tastes? i can't answer on behalf of women, but from a personal perspective... i just don't think it would do much for me. i've seen porn i thought was hot, (i'll be the first to admit that gay porn is yum!) but it just doesn't get me going in the same way that lying in bed fantasizing about crush/es catering to my every whim and thinking the sun shines outta my ass does. its the difference between a quick thrill and a long slow buildup to a thunderous climax.

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 25 August 2004 23:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Kind of off-topic - but I've never got the marketing of pr0n. It seems to (sometimes?) place a large emphasis on penis size - the 'stars' (male, that is) seem to be well (monstrously? Man, lots of brackets...) endowed. Are men watching these because of latent homosexuality - if so, are they really so stupid not to notice that is what it is? Or is the implication that sex is better with a man who has a large penis? If that is the case, it would seem that men buy into the 'size matters' thing more than they let on, and presumably feel 'belittled' by the film. Or is it just like 'f1st1ng', the attempt to find ever more brutal means of penetration, which is after all the most important sexual display of dominance, perhaps with the 'cumsh0t'? Ah, maybe p0rn is just self-delusion anyway, and nobody, from the suppliers to the users, gives it a lot of thought.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Wednesday, 25 August 2004 23:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Idealized projection.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Thursday, 26 August 2004 00:02 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think it necessarily means you have any homosexual tendencies if you like to see a girl get fucked by a huge dick. Just as it doesn't mean you wanna fuck a horse if you like watching girls get fucked by one.

oops (Oops), Thursday, 26 August 2004 05:29 (twenty-one years ago)

mwahahaha

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 26 August 2004 05:36 (twenty-one years ago)

My favourite type of porn is that which involves attractive people getting off. I don't care what sex they're of or who they're doing it with. The more realistically pleasured they appear, the better the porn. This leads me to dislike a lot of the crappy two-disinterested-girls-lezzing-it-up "lesbian" porn and a lot of "straight" porn too.

Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 26 August 2004 05:44 (twenty-one years ago)

*applauds*

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 26 August 2004 05:45 (twenty-one years ago)

The more realistically pleasured they appear, the better the porn.
Totally OTM.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 26 August 2004 05:46 (twenty-one years ago)

This is sort of opposite the lesbian question, but what about all the almost-gay male acts in allegedly straight porn? Bukkake -- basically a big gay circle jerk, allegedly redeemed by the mediating presence of a woman. Double (or more) penetration -- OK, again, there's a woman in the middle, but that doesn't change the fact that you've got men in extremely intimate contact with each other.

I think Andrew's otm -- sexy is sexy, and sexy stuff provokes sexual responses. Straight guys can admit to getting off on two women without threatening their own sexual identity. We could also get off on two men, but we mostly won't let ourselves. Also, I think whoever said straight guys would be shocked by real lesbian sex is 100 percent wrong; I think plenty of straight guys would totally dig real lesbian sex. Go film some and put it up online and see how you do.

spittle (spittle), Thursday, 26 August 2004 06:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe Jeanne thought we (as in most males) actually like that fauz-lesbian crap.

oops (Oops), Thursday, 26 August 2004 06:09 (twenty-one years ago)

We DO like faux lesbians. But at least some of us would like real lesbians even better. Just sayin'.

spittle (spittle), Thursday, 26 August 2004 06:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Like Andrew said, realism is hotter. If it's obvious that the girls are only licking each other cause there's cameras around and money on the table, it's not very sexy.

oops (Oops), Thursday, 26 August 2004 06:12 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post
I was trying to communicate that to Jeanne upthread, but she hasn't come back to thread yet.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Thursday, 26 August 2004 06:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, like the Gina Gershon-Meg Tilly scene in Bound (how has that not made this thread yet?). I read one of them, Tilly I think, talking about how they decided that if they were gonna do that scene, they were gonna go for it and really get into it. I've never had lesbian sex, so I can't judge its authenticity...but for an obligatory lesbian scene, it's a hottie.

spittle (spittle), Thursday, 26 August 2004 06:21 (twenty-one years ago)

i think porn needs more of adam brodie giving joaquin phoenix a handjob who then politely deposits his splooge on steve shelley's bitchtits. maybe then i'd find it more exciting than strawberry soy milk.

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Thursday, 26 August 2004 06:54 (twenty-one years ago)

sadly i have never seen any by/for/starring lesbian porn, so i cannot add to the faux vs authentic debate, except to say that those giving-women-head-like-sucking-a-lemon types do absolutely nothing for me.

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Thursday, 26 August 2004 07:03 (twenty-one years ago)

so what about lesbian erotic fiction? does that do anything for the straight guys who yearn for more authenticity in the representation of lesbian sex?

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Thursday, 26 August 2004 07:06 (twenty-one years ago)

thirteen years pass...

"Wide areas of Tokyo now sit below sea level, protected by aging dikes."

calstars, Saturday, 7 October 2017 01:14 (eight years ago)

Frank Miller to thread

passé aggresif (darraghmac), Saturday, 7 October 2017 10:34 (eight years ago)

File under 'Threads that have not aged well'

Le Bateau Ivre, Saturday, 7 October 2017 11:41 (eight years ago)

Why does most otherwise heterosexual pr0n contain at least one scene

One can only imagine the extensive research behind this observation.

A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 7 October 2017 17:35 (eight years ago)

I initially interpreted the thread title as being a complaint about some kind of club or party scene.

IF (Terrorist) Yes, Explain (man alive), Saturday, 7 October 2017 17:49 (eight years ago)

Ah yes the burgeoning scene of obligatory lesbians

passé aggresif (darraghmac), Saturday, 7 October 2017 18:16 (eight years ago)

I also read it that way. Like "man, I got to quit this scene"

calstars, Saturday, 7 October 2017 19:22 (eight years ago)

In every town, there's an obligatory lesbian scene.

calstars, Saturday, 7 October 2017 19:24 (eight years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.