Secularism vs xmas FITE!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I didn't think it would be controversial to suggest at work that our marketing materials shouldn't say 'Merry Christmas' but something less religious instead. I think using 'Christmas' might not exactly offend people, but maybe alienate them a bit. Am I being over-sensitive?

beanz (beanz), Thursday, 8 December 2005 10:11 (twenty years ago)

Yes.

What would you suggest that isn't religion-, calender- or hemisphere-based?

Christmas card with manger, wise men, donkey -> religious.
Christmas card with santa, gifts, tree -> secular.

StanM (StanM), Thursday, 8 December 2005 10:28 (twenty years ago)

yea, fuck it, it is a bit oversensitive imo. xmas is a secular festival of dvd boxsets and sparkly lights.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 8 December 2005 10:29 (twenty years ago)

You just want all the pressies and none of the guilt.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 8 December 2005 10:31 (twenty years ago)

xmas is a secular festival of dvd boxsets and sparkly lights.

-- Theorry Henry (miltonpinsk...), December 8th, 2005.

otfm

latebloomer: The Corridor (Yes, The Corridor) (latebloomer), Thursday, 8 December 2005 10:31 (twenty years ago)

winter solstice

calderdale in the 70s (gareth), Thursday, 8 December 2005 10:33 (twenty years ago)

what are you marketing, beans?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Thursday, 8 December 2005 10:37 (twenty years ago)

very panto season

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 8 December 2005 10:39 (twenty years ago)

I think if your customers are likely to be of various different faiths, there's nothing too PC gone mad about using 'Seasons Greetings'. Most corporate 'Christmas' cards that we get these days seem to use that already.

Archel (Archel), Thursday, 8 December 2005 10:40 (twenty years ago)

> winter solstice

does paganism not count as religion? 8)

(also this doesn't work in southern hemisphere where it isn't winter)

koogs (koogs), Thursday, 8 December 2005 10:45 (twenty years ago)

I don't want the pressies.

What would you suggest that isn't religion-, calender- or hemisphere-based?

I didn't suggest it shouldn't be calendar-based. 'Season's greetings' would be fine, although it's a bit ugly. Not everyone's Christian and Christmas is a religious festival – it might be 'secularised' in that many people are not religious but still celebrate it, but it is associated with a particular religion after all.

It's not exactly a new debate, but it is a bit frustrating trying to explain to colleagues how I think they could be a bit more inclusive. (Diplomatically, obviously)

They're marketing the mag I write for. I just raised it as a sort of point for discussion but the discussion got pretty animated. 'PC-gone-mad' was a phrase that did crop up.

beanz (beanz), Thursday, 8 December 2005 10:46 (twenty years ago)

How about a message that says "Brrr it's cold outside - let's party!"

James Ward (jamesmichaelward), Thursday, 8 December 2005 10:54 (twenty years ago)

We have a winner!

beanz (beanz), Thursday, 8 December 2005 11:02 (twenty years ago)

But but what if there's eskimoes about and they think it's not cold at all? They could consider that a temperaturist statement!

StanM (StanM), Thursday, 8 December 2005 11:10 (twenty years ago)

Happy Newtonmas?

RickyT (RickyT), Thursday, 8 December 2005 11:21 (twenty years ago)

This is Very Serious, so behave. Or we'll put you on our marketing database and then you'll be sorry

beanz (beanz), Thursday, 8 December 2005 11:35 (twenty years ago)

Look what happened when the White House decided the same thing: miffed!

StanM (StanM), Thursday, 8 December 2005 11:38 (twenty years ago)

So, in fact: damned if you do...

People are retarded.

StanM (StanM), Thursday, 8 December 2005 11:40 (twenty years ago)

"Happy Winter Consumer Fest"

In Lambeth, we don't have Xmas. We have winter lights that go up at Diwali and stay there until New Years.

As a vaguely religious person (or at least someone whose family are devout Christians) I actually understand that secularisation of Christmas to be about "lights and DVD boxsets" is actually pretty offensive. But rather than this whole "Jesus is the reason for the season" and "put Christ back in christmas" malarchy, I'd rather make the whole winter festival secular and non-denominational and leave individual religious celebrations to the individuals.

Control your ponies, children! (kate), Thursday, 8 December 2005 12:26 (twenty years ago)

very panto season

Oh no it isn't!

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Thursday, 8 December 2005 12:28 (twenty years ago)

i generally don't buy cards that say 'merry christmas' since i don't get all emotional about the birth of our lord and savior jesus christ (although i understand people who get a deeper meaning out of it all, it's just not for me). season's greetings is ok, happy holidays is better, i like 'best wishes for a happy new year' best. especially since it doesn't matter if those ones turn up after xmas.

colette (a2lette), Thursday, 8 December 2005 12:32 (twenty years ago)

jehovah's witnesses don't do birthdays. i'm just sayin.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 8 December 2005 12:45 (twenty years ago)

My six-year-old Jewish American cousin recently noticed for the first time that "there are a lot more Christmas people than there are Hannukah people". Apparently this left him quite glum for a spell.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Thursday, 8 December 2005 12:48 (twenty years ago)

jehovah's witnesses don't do birthdays.

OMG! So Michael Jackson really IS 8 years old...

StanM (StanM), Thursday, 8 December 2005 13:02 (twenty years ago)

festivus

thor heyerdahl (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 8 December 2005 13:02 (twenty years ago)

— Members of the Columbia High School brass ensemble were not allowed to play Christmas carols at their holiday concert this year — not even instrumental versions.

"This is censorship at its most basic level and political correctness to its extreme," said student Ryan Dahn.

This was last year.
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/Vote2004/story?id=308996&page=1

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 13:08 (twenty years ago)

Separation of church and state seems pretty important to me. Wish we had it in the UK.

beanz (beanz), Thursday, 8 December 2005 13:10 (twenty years ago)

Who in their right mind is offended by a faceless piece of marketing collateral anyway, religious or otherwise? Don't people just chuck these things straight in the bin, regardless of whether or not they believe in Baby Jesus?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 8 December 2005 13:26 (twenty years ago)

Probably

beanz (beanz), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:26 (twenty years ago)

Who in their right mind [...]

Okay, stop right there.

Dan (Remember The World We Live In) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:32 (twenty years ago)

surely

Xmas isn't religious!

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)

that's just celebrating malcolm X, or wolverine.

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)

the xmas carol thing is pretty crazy. think how much of popular music comes out of religious music. especially in the states!

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:35 (twenty years ago)

"look, charlie brown, let's face it, we all know christmas is a big commercial racket, it's run by a big eastern syndicate, yknow."

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

or finding the pirates buried treasure.

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

X-post

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

the problem with 'season greetings' is that does it really make a lot of sense? what does that really mean?

what is a non-religious version of easter?

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:37 (twenty years ago)

Beanz you have my sympathy!! We have to go through this every year, sending out a card which can have NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH CHRISTMAS except it happens to be sent in December. The reason isn't that the recipients will be offended receiving it, it's that our offices in Tokyo, Dubai, Mumbai etc won't want to send a 'Western-style' card. Which is fair enough but designing the thing then becomes a total nightmare. The tagline we came up with this year is so embarassing I can only reveal it in the pub.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:39 (twenty years ago)

to be like not religious we'd have to invent somehow manufacture some random holidays (erm... maybe not 'holidays') that happen in various times of the year.

not that it's that difficult. just have random 'bank holiday's instead

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:40 (twenty years ago)

The reason isn't that the recipients will be offended receiving it, it's that our offices in Tokyo, Dubai, Mumbai etc won't want to send a 'Western-style' card

but why would they be sending a card at all?

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:40 (twenty years ago)

The tagline we came up with this year is so embarassing I can only reveal it in the pub.

WHERE THE TITTIES AT????

Dan (You Know I'm Right) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:41 (twenty years ago)

Because the company sends a Christmas card! I know, IT'S MENTAL, welcome to corporate marketing. Oh let's do a New Years card instead BUT WHAT ABOUT CHINA.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)

xpost 'happy wobs'

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

i bet the HSBC knows a way to solve that problem!!!

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

remember not to send a music card to afganistan!

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:45 (twenty years ago)

Tom don't be a tease!
HI DERE MAERY CRISMASS

beanz (beanz), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:50 (twenty years ago)

haha

HI DERE WEHN WAS JSEUS MADE?

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:52 (twenty years ago)

LOL HI DERE ASIANS

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:53 (twenty years ago)

We were briefly worried about there being a reference to eating pork on our Xmas cards (which didn't have any direct reference to Xmas) in case it offended vegetarians our near-eastern cousins.

Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)

FWIW, I have been wished a merry Christmas by half a dozen Muslim students today alone. To a lot of people it seems to be just words, with a friendly sentiment. Whether that's a good or bad thing though...

Archel (Archel), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:05 (twenty years ago)

Or maybe cos it is Christmas coming up. I get wished happy chanukah by people who aren't Jewish now and then (when it's chanukah, that is)

beanz (beanz), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:18 (twenty years ago)

and on the 8th Dec!!
xpost

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:20 (twenty years ago)

yeah, folks wish me happy chinese new year around chinese new year. or "gung hey fat choi" they'd say.

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:21 (twenty years ago)

or sometimes they'd say "'gung ho..' what is that thing you say again?"

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:22 (twenty years ago)

it's all in good spirit really so what's the harm?

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:22 (twenty years ago)

No harm. You'd think it weird if they wished you 'well over the fast' or 'have a good passover' though, right?

beanz (beanz), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)

I had a friend in NYC who laughed at me when I said "happy Yom Kippur" to her because she said "it's a *solemn* day of attonement! But thanks for the sentiment, anyway."

Control your ponies, children! (kate), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:31 (twenty years ago)

Way to be insensitive, you grand inquisitor!!

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:33 (twenty years ago)

xpost Yeah I can see how that might sound odd! But everyone appreciates good wishes.

One thing I find really strange is when people ask me, 'so do Jews really not celebrate Christmas at all?' Depends on the tone of voice – being interested is fine, being incredulous is different.

beanz (beanz), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:34 (twenty years ago)

I'm for celebrating any and all holidays(religious or not), particularly if they involve:

1) food
2) beer

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:50 (twenty years ago)

You wouldn't like Yom Kippur much I guess

beanz (beanz), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:51 (twenty years ago)

yeah, there's that

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:53 (twenty years ago)

haha!

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:53 (twenty years ago)

"DA JEWS HAVE NO PLACE IN THE HOLIDAY SEASON!"


http://www.theexperiment.org/media/ohreallyLG.jpg

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:55 (twenty years ago)

This greeting card will solve all of your problems.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)

what is a non-religious version of easter?

-- ken c (pykachu10...), December 8th, 2005.

Spring Festival? You know Easter is a pagan fertility festival anyway right...? (Easter = eastre = Estrogen etc)

Zora (Zora), Thursday, 8 December 2005 16:10 (twenty years ago)

pagan fertility festival anyway right

and the whole "rabbit & egg" thing, too.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)

It's only called something like Easter in English, German and a few other languages. Most other Western languages name it something similar to the Hebrew word for Passover. The passover is also where the day comes from. The decision of the date was derived from the Hebrew calender.

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)

jon stewart otm about the handiness of "happy holidays"... cause you know, there is more than one... AND who the fuck has time to say "merry christmas and a happy new year"?

like 12/25 is actually jesus's b-day.

like the early church even celebrated it.

like everybody wears a name badge with their religion on it so you know what holiday to wish them. (would it be in poor taste to make a nazi reference here?) seriously... do we wish our brit pals happy independence day? i know nobody cares these days, but... sorta stupid yes?

like happy cultural imperialism season everybody!

like, and oh, and one more thing... xmas vs. christmas... xmas shouldn't be offensive to christians. x was commonly used as a marking for jesus in early chrisendom.

words schmerds. who for some emphatic grunting and cave paintings?
m.

msp (mspa), Thursday, 8 December 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)

I, a US citizen, carried around a lantern on St. Martin's day. It was fun.

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 16:50 (twenty years ago)

like, and oh, and one more thing... xmas vs. christmas... xmas shouldn't be offensive to christians. x was commonly used as a marking for jesus in early chrisendom.

Then I find it odd that non-christians like to use this making reference to the cross instead of just a name.

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 16:52 (twenty years ago)

i decree that we should all eat babka for christmas.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 8 December 2005 16:52 (twenty years ago)

http://www2.raisport.rai.it/news/eventi/sydney2000/200006/03/393941ec07245/bubka4.jpg

StanM (StanM), Thursday, 8 December 2005 16:55 (twenty years ago)

Then I find it odd that non-christians like to use this making reference to the cross instead of just a name.

huh? who actually does this?

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 16:55 (twenty years ago)

we had babka at our church christmas party!
m.

msp (mspa), Thursday, 8 December 2005 16:56 (twenty years ago)

as a non-christian, I find these kill-joys who want to stop me stuffing my face with food and booze on December 25th deeply offensive.

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 8 December 2005 16:57 (twenty years ago)

I had cards once that said "Peace on Earth" - I like that, but I guess you kind of have to be a certain person to be giving cards that say that. Or actually saying that. But I like the sentiment.

mmm, babka.

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 8 December 2005 16:57 (twenty years ago)

i thought xmas was more of a lazy thing. and perhaps to secularize. but that's their deal. i suggest that xians should let it ride. it's not like we don't thrust the virgin mary on everybody else every year... we should be able to tolerate a little "x" now and then. (sorry to put "thrust" and "virgin mary" in there. couldn't help myself.)

i think "peace on earth" rules. a generalized holiday about giving and thankfulness... "peace on earth" seems like a great gift to wish for.

santa?
m.

msp (mspa), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)

kingfish, every single person that says "Xmas."

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:04 (twenty years ago)

X is not a reference to the crucifixion Cross, it is the Chi + ro, and not the same as the letter "X" although it's used that way in modern typography. The greeks used it all the time to denote Christ, and I fail to see how it's offensive.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:07 (twenty years ago)

I turned on my twinkly lights. Easy, because I hadn't taken them down yet after last year, nor put away the tree decorations. I love the lights. The solstice needs it. And Peace on Earth is a great thing to hope for, but the major religions have done everything in their power to thwart it. Jesus, Moses, Mohammed, etc—their birthdays should be occasions of mourning. As soon as time travel is invented someone should go back and tie their mamas' tubes.
Feh.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:07 (twenty years ago)

i thought xmas was more of a lazy thing.

it was certainly started due to that.

kingfish, every single person that says "Xmas."

ah.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:08 (twenty years ago)

Personally I used it as shorthand, not because I didn't want to use the word 'Christ'. I'm sure there are some who don't like the word cos it means 'the annointed one' i.e. messiah, but it don't bother me.

beanz (beanz), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:08 (twenty years ago)

The orgin in greek doesn't really mean much. Words change. How about: "We wish you all a gay old xmas."


article:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4097755.stm

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)

It's kinda like those people who hate the lmabda because it's become a symbol of the gay pride movement, so they want it out of schools. No more wavelengths. (There are people like this in Indiana)

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)

lambda.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)

A Nairn's point wasn't that it was offensive, but that it was odd that the "secular" version of the word was clearly no more "secular" than the full version.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)

wait, who is still doing the lambada and why are they doing it in schools?!

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:12 (twenty years ago)

the same people who are still doing the vogue and are still doing it in the schools!!

Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:13 (twenty years ago)

(jocelyn, thanks for the Greek letter explanation! I thought it meant something like that but didn't know.)

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:13 (twenty years ago)

But the LAMBADA?
hm. I just don't remember doing it in school even at its height. oh, wait. now i remember.

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:15 (twenty years ago)

oh i always thought the x in xmas is just being 1337!

like x0rmas

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:16 (twenty years ago)

BTW, to answer the original thread question, NO, he is not being over-sensitive. What is the matter with everyone who is giving him crap for this? Yes, you might alienate people sending out cards that give propers to a very specific, traditionally religious holiday, and as a business you don't want to do that. Who in their right minds, to quote someone else, wouldn't have the business sense to realize that being "too politically correct" is better than offending a potential customer?

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:16 (twenty years ago)

haha - where x is whatever.
x(ha)post

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:17 (twenty years ago)

"let's put the 'x' in 'xmas'" = the best KISS song that never was :-(

Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:18 (twenty years ago)

what does the LAMBDA as an acronym stand for anyway? All I can think of is: Lesbian And Men Bisexual Doing Anal?

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:18 (twenty years ago)

depends on the business i guess. but in this case it doesn't sound like it's a marketing firm for christian magazines.

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:18 (twenty years ago)

Yes. That is exactly what it means.

xpost yes, if all of your customers are Christians and that is who you market to, then you are fine doing Christmas cards instead of holiday cards, obviously. I should've included the caveat for those places that sell Jesus shooting hoops and playing keep away with children figurines.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:19 (twenty years ago)

Sometimes being "too politically correct" can be offensive to some people.

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:20 (twenty years ago)

but maybe not the majority

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

You would seriously be offended by something that says "Seasons Greetings" or "Peace on Earth" instead of "Merry Christmas"?

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

why is this even an issue? are we to believe that christians have been silently stewing in their juices because of this "happy holidays" thing for all these years?!?

Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)

Some people will stew over anything. Haven't I ever told this joke before, that an Evangelical is just a Protestant who's mad about something?

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

not really in this case, but in others. A lot of little PCness can add up too.

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

It's kinda like those people who hate the lmabda because it's become a symbol of the gay pride movement

http://ck37.image.pbase.com/image/38604246.jpg
http://www.husney.com/~jordanh/gallery/albums/Pictures-People-Unknown_or_Candid/01_Halloween_Dinkytown_Revenge_of_the_Nerds_Boy.sized.jpg

GET EQUIPPED WITH USHER AS LAMAR (ex machina), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

x-post

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)


[insert business name]

Customer Order Form

Product | Qty
--------------------------------
--------------------------|-----
--------------------------|-----
--------------------------|-----
--------------------------|-----
--------------------------|-----
--------------------------------


[] i accept the terms and conditions of this order

From time to time, we will send out cards/gifts of goodwill, customised to your religious prefereneces, please specify your religious preference below.

Christian/Catholic/Muslim/Hindu/Buddhist/Pastafarian/Other (Please specify _______________)

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:26 (twenty years ago)

FIVE BUCKS FOR COORS PITCHERS? jesus christ people wtf

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:26 (twenty years ago)

Nairn, what are the "other" circumstances in which you would be offended by statements like that?

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:27 (twenty years ago)

i agree -- $5 coors pictures is FAR more offensive to my sensibilities than anything any gay people have ever done.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)

(I don't think LAMBDA actually stands for anything, as an acronym.
major xpost, caring about it is over, but hey)

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)

Curtis Armstrong needs to be in more movies.

(xpost: i was waiting for ken to come up with an acronym meaning, but oh well)

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:29 (twenty years ago)

http://www.lambda.org/symbols.htm
ban rainbows! and triangles!

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)

um...I don't really get offended. But It's usually bad when PCness becomes censorship or infringes on other rights.


here is why they use lambda:

the lambda soon became a quick way for the members of the gay community to identify each other. The reasoning was that the lambda would easily be mistaken for a college fraternity symbol and ignored by the majority of the population.

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)

A Nairn. Please explain to me how "Seasons Greetings" or "Peace on Earth" being used by corporations in lieu of a specific holiday greeting infringes on anyone's rights immediately, or I am just going to commence harrassing you to get you to leave the thread, as you are not being on topic if you are trying to make some sweeping Christian's rights argument again that has no bearing on the subject being discussed.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:32 (twenty years ago)

I posted above that I don't think being PC in this case infringes on anything, but sometimes being PC can, (or rather what appears PC really might not be PC)

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:35 (twenty years ago)

the lambda would easily be mistaken for a college fraternity symbol and ignored by the majority of the population.

ha!

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:35 (twenty years ago)

Might as well post this here:

Without Christ there wouldn't be a world adorned with lights.

(note: link best read whilst beat-boxing)

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:50 (twenty years ago)

if christians were subjected to lectures about the "evils" of christianity or a greeting of "so many christians, so few lions" in response to their saying "merry christmas" to an employee of any given business establishment, then i could understand any claims of their rights being infringed or their feelings hurt or whatever. likewise, if any christian can offer up any evidence of an employee being fired or targetted for some sort of employer retaliation for saying "merry christmas" as opposed to "happy holidays," they may be pleasantly surprised to find out that i would support them if they sued or filed a complaint against such an employer (b/c such actions would violate their civil liberties).

in the absence of the foregoing, however, then all i can conclude is that this is a B.S. issue.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)

faster than Groucho Marx's cigar

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)

I don't think being PC in this case infringes on anything, but sometimes being PC can, (or rather what appears PC really might not be PC)

well, that certainly cleared everything up. thank you.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 8 December 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)

Here's a better article than the Renew America one:

http://www.str.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5171

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)

define "better"

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)

less razzmatazz

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)

needs more flow

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)

this is long but another better article about Christmas:

http://www.probe.org/content/view/84/91/

A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 8 December 2005 18:15 (twenty years ago)

Happy Yule! (People celebrate all sorts of different stuff, and while there's nothing evil about wishing people happy holidays that you celebrate but they don't -- i.e., saying "Merry Christmas" to a Jew is still like a good-faith hope for their merriness during a time you find exciting, which isn't so bad -- surely it still gets annoying and oppressive to have everyone around totally ignoring the fact that you don't necessarily share their religious observations -- irritating and condescending and smothering -- meaning a little polite vagueness, w/r/t strangers and business communications and such, can be nice.) Merry Zarathosht Diso Death of Prophet Zarathushtra Day!

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 8 December 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)

I think the reason the "PC" angle here annoys Christians is this: Christmas is such a major holiday, with such an associated "season" of good feeling, that Christians seem to love the idea that suddenly everyone's shared values come bubbling out -- that you can be standing in line with strangers or something but then suddenly be all like "Merry Christmas" and share some noble moment of connection over some really basic gut-level shared-culture stuff. That's what the conservative ones among them want, a world in which all those basics are just assumed of everyone -- they want to say "Christmas" to everyone and forge that connection and feel reassured that everyone's on the same page. So when it's suggested that they say "Happy Holidays," what's bugging them isn't just that someone's correcting their language -- what's bugging them is the fear that maybe they don't have that connection, that the person they're addressing really might believe something different from them, which for various reasons seems to scare them absolutely shitless.

"Happy Holidays" comes from a kind of super-polite pluralism -- like, "you can celebrate anything you want here, and we won't even presume to expect it to be any one holiday, because we want you to be comfortable and equal." And in doing so it undercuts one of the major things some people like about Christmas, which is that it's pitched as the one time of year during which we're "all" supposedly thinking and feeling the same things -- not just the people you know and in your church, but supposedly everyone.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 8 December 2005 18:37 (twenty years ago)

I was corrected by a presumed evangelical the other day. After saying "happy holidays," I was coldly told "It's called Christmas."
I was tempted to tell him that in my godless household, it was simply called "Dec. 25."

Binjominia (Brilhante), Thursday, 8 December 2005 19:34 (twenty years ago)

Proper response to that = "I was talking about Kwaanzaa, bitch."

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 8 December 2005 19:39 (twenty years ago)

These smug fux0rz are really putting a damper on the holiday spirit this year. Whoever let them see the identity politics playbook has a lot to answer for.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 8 December 2005 19:47 (twenty years ago)

this has been Bill O'Reilly's idiotic rant for the past two weeks, about how stores advertising Christmas enough, and using Season's Greetings instead. Stephen Colbert pointed out on Fresh Air last night that he's arguing FOR the commercialization of christmas, which is exactly what people used to get all pissed off about.

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 8 December 2005 20:10 (twenty years ago)

I still get all riled up when I think about a coworker who told me to "remember, christmas is about baby jesus" a couple of years ago. I've been celebrating christmas my whole life even though I'm not a christian. I find it deeply offensive to have somebody (from another country that doesn't celebrate christmas!) tell me that I don't know what my winter festival really means.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 8 December 2005 20:12 (twenty years ago)

yeah, it pisses me off that one of the most privileged race/belief ethnicities in the world plays the poo-poo-i'm-being-oppressed card.

christians who want religion mixed in with their politics play the "PCness is violating my religious rights" card. you'd hear in circles about how gay rights has been opposed because fearmongers are convincing christians that if gays have rights, then saying from the pulpit, "homosexuality is a sin" will be decreed hatespeech and thusly could be outlawed etc etc. cue gays everywhere. cue your kids and grandkids are going to hell. cue fire. cue brimstone.

culture embracing divorce. culture embracing casual sex. and now culture enforcing tolerance and language.

to me it's just spreading irrational fear to pump people up to vote.

the "happy holidays" thing is something to get people's minds off torture, scandals, wars, etc.
m.

msp (mspa), Thursday, 8 December 2005 20:21 (twenty years ago)

sorry... cards on the brain. cards cards cards.
m.

msp (mspa), Thursday, 8 December 2005 20:23 (twenty years ago)

Part of their problem is just confusing politeness with oppression. Like for instance you wouldn't send strangers a card that says "Hooray, Abortion is Legal," because you know not everyone feels the same way about that issue -- that's not some big legal rule, it's just a basic not-being-a-dick thing. Same principle goes for "Happy Holidays." Some Christians seem to interpret it as an effort to make Major Rules marginalize Christmas (hence their complaining that they "can't" say Christmas, as if there's some law), whereas really it's just a basic courtesy of not presuming other people necessarily celebrate what you do. And what the Christians are complaining about isn't even that they're being asked to extend a basic courtesy, it's that the world is shifting such that they may be considered jerks if they don't. (To which I say: go ahead and talk about Christmas all you want! But if you're jerky we'll think you're a jerk, and you'll just have to fucking get over it.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 8 December 2005 20:38 (twenty years ago)

we finally have a "war on christmas" thread. good.

the "happy holidays" thing is something to get people's minds off torture, scandals, wars, etc.

partially. I think there's a coupla other bits involved, too:

(1) one of the Fox guys actually has a book out about this, so he's gotta keep beating that drum. It's nice that they employ the secular symbol(decorated tree, etc) and frame it as "the Sacred Christian Holiday"

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/1595230165.01._AA240_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

(2) they gotta keep playing the "persecuted"/"oppressed" card, for the whole "righteousness thru martyrdom(without actually being martyred)" bit. Because when you see yourself losing the war, as it were, you're given license to cheat.

(3) some of these folks are even all a huffy about the white house putting out holiday cards. The choice quote from that article is from the Rev. Bob Edgar(former Dem congresscritter):

"I think it's more important to put Christ back into our war planning than into our Christmas cards"

I'll repost this from yesterday, about a rather in-depth Salon article talking about the bullshit of the entire deal.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 20:44 (twenty years ago)

we finally have a "war on christmas" thread. good.

the "happy holidays" thing is something to get people's minds off torture, scandals, wars, etc.

partially. I think there's a coupla other bits involved, too:

(1) one of the Fox guys actually has a book out about this, so he's gotta keep beating that drum. It's nice that they employ the secular symbol(decorated tree, etc) and frame it as "the Sacred Christian Holiday"

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/1595230165.01._AA240_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

(2) they gotta keep playing the "persecuted"/"oppressed" card, for the whole "righteousness thru martyrdom(without actually being martyred)" bit. Because when you see yourself losing the war, as it were, you're given license to cheat.

(3) some of these folks are even all a huffy about the white house putting out holiday cards. The choice quote from that article is from the Rev. Bob Edgar(former Dem congresscritter):

"I think it's more important to put Christ back into our war planning than into our Christmas cards"

I'll repost this from yesterday, about a rather in-depth Salon article talking about the bullshit of the entire deal.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 20:53 (twenty years ago)

shit.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 20:55 (twenty years ago)

card idea:
Front: Peace on Earth
Inside: Nabisco's last three posts OR Fucking get over it already. Lots of love, x

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 8 December 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)

It's nice that they employ the secular symbol(decorated tree, etc)

That's not a secular symbol. It's pagan.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 8 December 2005 21:27 (twenty years ago)

Quite true, but pretty co-opted.

Say, how did Frosty the Snowman become a Christmas dealie, since the story is set in late winter/almost spring?

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 21:29 (twenty years ago)

As I recall, the first and most succesful attempt to ban Christmas happened under the ostentatiously pious Cromwell.

I usually say 'Happy Holidays' but I will say 'Merry Christmas' on Christmas day. I don't believe in Christ so when I say it, it is in memory of all the happy Christmases I have spent and a partial recognition of pre-Christian Northern European religio-cultural ways for dealing with the cold and the dark. It's a cultural relic and I don't see why wishing someone a Merry Christmas has to imply any more than saying 'Saturday' implies that I worship the Roman pantheon or 'Friday' implies that I worship the Germanic one, or saying Good Bye implies that I believe in a deity.

M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 8 December 2005 21:48 (twenty years ago)

I'm with you there (except I do worship Thor on Thursdays). To come back to the original point - why the fuck would you send a christmas card to someone who doesn't want one? If you really think it's going to cause offence then just don't do it, rather than seeking around for some bland alternative that means little to sender or recipient.

Teh HoBB (the pirate king), Thursday, 8 December 2005 22:35 (twenty years ago)

I like how there all these menorahs everywhere when Hanukkah doesn't start until the 25th

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 December 2005 23:10 (twenty years ago)

speaking of which...

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 23:14 (twenty years ago)

*smacks forehead*

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 December 2005 23:17 (twenty years ago)

I love the "I like to play with fire" look on his face.

M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 8 December 2005 23:17 (twenty years ago)

I do worship Thor on Thursdays

shucks.

thor heyerdahl (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 8 December 2005 23:23 (twenty years ago)

*smacks forehead*

"What? We already had the Lighting of the Christmas Tree, so we're lighting all the menorah candles today. What's the big deal?"

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 8 December 2005 23:26 (twenty years ago)

Nabisco in fighting the "Christians" strawman he made... shocker.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 9 December 2005 05:15 (twenty years ago)

I mean Nabisco et al.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 9 December 2005 05:19 (twenty years ago)

These smug fux0rz are really putting a damper on the holiday spirit this year. Whoever let them see the identity politics playbook has a lot to answer for.

Seriously. Turning Christmas into one more goddam culture-war cudgel is so grinchy. But I don't think they're gonna get much traction. Killjoy moralists have been bitching about Christmas for one reason or another for a couple centuries, and it's just kind of gone on its merry little way. We like our winter lights and parties.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Friday, 9 December 2005 05:23 (twenty years ago)

I think a good choice for the real reason a certain breed of killjoy, jerk Christians are making this an issue (most like faultily) is in response to anti-Christians spitefully making issues of many other trivial things in the public square.


What is the difference between being offended and having a cause?

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 9 December 2005 05:38 (twenty years ago)

I used to get really angry about public displays of religion, being Jewish and all, but now I just feel depressed by it -- especially by the recent backlach/onslaught. I was in the post office the other day -- a federal building, mind you -- and they were actually playing bona-fide religious Christian songs, not just holiday carols. This sort of thing really does alienate me. One branch of my family has been here since 1860, yet I'm bombarded with the message that I'm not a *regular American.* It really does make me feel kind of sad -- I though America had reached, or at least was reaching this kind of ideal balance between secularism and religion. And the fact that Conservatives make such a fucking issue out of whether break is called "Christmas" or "Winter" just feels like a slap in the face.

*Jazz Douchebag* Berman (Hurting), Friday, 9 December 2005 05:39 (twenty years ago)

That's what the conservative ones among them want, a world in which all those basics are just assumed of everyone

What are your sources for this?

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 9 December 2005 05:42 (twenty years ago)

I can't really equalize the two side of the debate here, because one side is saying "Hey, I'm offended that you didn't include me," whereas the other side, whether they mean to or not, is saying "Hey, I'm offended that you included them"

*Jazz Douchebag* Berman (Hurting), Friday, 9 December 2005 05:48 (twenty years ago)

I think a good choice for the real reason a certain breed of killjoy, jerk Christians are making this an issue (most like faultily) is in response to anti-Christians spitefully making issues of many other trivial things in the public square.

Oh bullshit, Nairn. Please. Give it a rest.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Friday, 9 December 2005 05:52 (twenty years ago)

anti-Christians spitefully making issues of many other trivial things in the public square.

cf. "the identity politics playbook"

Nairn, where are these anti-Christians? How is The Man keeping Christians down?

(And don't point the finger at me. Some of my best friends are Christians. And they're adorable when they celebrate their holiday. All that singin'... A very musical people...)

(xpost)

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 9 December 2005 05:52 (twenty years ago)

Hurting, I sypathize with you. I sometimes feel a little depressed when I see public religious or anti-religious displays too. But theres hope. Yet I believe not in this world. I don't think America could ever reach the ideal balance.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 9 December 2005 05:52 (twenty years ago)

what trivial things? oh you mean the seperation of church and state huh.

oops (Oops), Friday, 9 December 2005 05:56 (twenty years ago)

I can't really equalize the two side of the debate here

You're under no obligation to do so. Accepting that there's anything here to debate just means that the asshats have already won.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 9 December 2005 05:57 (twenty years ago)

anti-Christians spitefully making issues of many other trivial things in the public square.

yeah, it's gotta be pretty bad for the Christians, since their don't control the Presidency, the Supreme Court, or any of the state & federal legislatures. if ONLY they had some elected officials championing their cause.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 05:58 (twenty years ago)

why does Christians hate America?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 9 December 2005 05:59 (twenty years ago)

"We have solved, by fair experiment, the great and interesting question whether freedom of religion is compatible with order in government and obedience to the laws. And we have experienced the quiet as well as the comfort which results from leaving every one to profess freely and openly those principles of religion which are the inductions of his own reason and the serious convictions of his own inquiries."
--Thomas Jefferson

"No religious reading, instruction or exercise, shall be prescribed or practiced [in the elementary schools] inconsistent with the tenets of any religious sect or denomination." --Thomas Jefferson: Elementary School Act, 1817.

I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their Legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church and State." --Thomas Jefferson to Danbury Baptists, 1802

*Jazz Douchebag* Berman (Hurting), Friday, 9 December 2005 06:00 (twenty years ago)

Nairn, where are these anti-Christians? How is The Man keeping Christians down?
maybe the ACLU?

At least that's the kind of organization that groups like the Alliance Defense Fund are responding too.


Nairn. Please. Give it a rest.

comparing the extreme Christian groups to the moderate non-Christian groups doesn't give one any real insight.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 9 December 2005 06:00 (twenty years ago)

Can you cite a specific situation in which the ACLU has actually repressed or opressed Christians rather than merely standing up for the rights of people of other religions?

*Jazz Douchebag* Berman (Hurting), Friday, 9 December 2005 06:02 (twenty years ago)

their don't control

should be "they" etc.

Can you cite a specific situation in which the ACLU has actually repressed or opressed Christians rather than merely standing up for the rights of people of other religions?

Well, Hurting, don't you remember that one time when the ACLU barged into a school a coupla years ago to beat a student for handing out candy canes with bible verses on them?

Hell, the ACLU even put out press releases promoting the victory against this martyred child and that they thirst for the blood of every firstborn male child in Christendom!

It's great that guys like Jerry Falwell were there getting on the ACLU's case. Also, at Renew America. Or Newsmax.

Etc.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 06:17 (twenty years ago)

I just realized that to me Thomas Jefferson is a much greater figure than Jesus.

*Jazz Douchebag* Berman (Hurting), Friday, 9 December 2005 06:23 (twenty years ago)

nickels certainly buy me more than little crosses

latebloomer: The Corridor (Yes, The Corridor) (latebloomer), Friday, 9 December 2005 06:27 (twenty years ago)

First off, the notion that candy canes could have been used as a secret means of identification by persecuted European Christians is directly contradicted by history. Candy canes didn't appear until at least the latter part of the 17th century, by which time Europe was almost entirely Christian. By then, people who were not Christians would have been the ones in need of this form of "secret handshake"!

You're telling me!

*Jazz Douchebag* Berman (Hurting), Friday, 9 December 2005 06:31 (twenty years ago)

TJ had great reverence for Jesus, yet wasn't so up on his Divinity(being a Deist & all). Thought he was one of the great moral teachers, tho.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 06:35 (twenty years ago)

Thomas Jefferson helped create a country that I (still) really like living in. What did Jesus ever do for me?

*Jazz Douchebag* Berman (Hurting), Friday, 9 December 2005 06:38 (twenty years ago)

Talked about how it'd be a neat idea to give a fuck about poor folks, hungry folks, naked folks, etc. for starters.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 06:41 (twenty years ago)

Well, to be fair, it's not really him so much as his followers through the ages with whom I have a bone to pick.

*Jazz Douchebag* Berman (Hurting), Friday, 9 December 2005 06:44 (twenty years ago)

and here

talks about TJ & John Adams expressing their personal creed: "Be just and good"

xpost exactly.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 06:47 (twenty years ago)

One branch of my family has been here since 1860, yet I'm bombarded with the message that I'm not a *regular American.*

OTM. all of my grandparents were born in america -- you could argue that this makes me "more" american than some chick in second-gen scandi chixor in minnesota.

for a lot of people, jews are pretty far from being regular americans. we've had to struggle through A LOT (not just in america, but throughout world history) to get the purely theoretical equal footing we have today. but hey, we still write "caucasian" on all our forms just like real white people.

thor heyerdahl (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 9 December 2005 07:00 (twenty years ago)

High Five for Caucasian status!

*Jazz Douchebag* Berman (Hurting), Friday, 9 December 2005 07:02 (twenty years ago)

than some chick in second-gen scandi chixor in minnesota.

ugh... sorry, just woke up from a nap.

thor heyerdahl (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 9 December 2005 07:02 (twenty years ago)

But what really annoys me is the endless forgetfulness that this country was designed to fully accept and protect folks like us from the beginning -- Evangelicals act as though we're asking for some kind of unreasonable special priveleges that infringe on their Christian country.

*Jazz Douchebag* Berman (Hurting), Friday, 9 December 2005 07:05 (twenty years ago)

if they accept hanukah, they have to accept all those other dubious special-interest holidays!

thor heyerdahl (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 9 December 2005 07:08 (twenty years ago)

Side note I learned the other day.... In TJ's time he helped get the federal gov right, but the state governments still had major anti-nonchristian laws during that time. I think it was Maryland that disallowed non-Trinitarian Christian believers from holding local office. Several other states had hardcore, "You believe or you must leave the state or face penalties of death" type laws leftover from colonial days. Funny that people who fled persecution were guilty of a lot of the same insanity once they got over here.

m.

msp (mspa), Friday, 9 December 2005 07:26 (twenty years ago)

following from what i was saying, i often wonder what kind of cultural acceptance roman-catholic and irish-catholic immigrants would have today if jfk had never become president. there isn't really a protestant/catholic divide in this country anymore -- seems that as long as you're a christian, that's good enough.

thor heyerdahl (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 9 December 2005 07:30 (twenty years ago)

they mentioned this on one of PRI's talk shows earlier this week, about how we're could have a majority Catholic Supreme Court for the first time in our history, and just the fact that it wasn't news...

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 07:40 (twenty years ago)

Nairn the "source" for my opinions tends to be "me" (duh), but if you need really need a "source" for my sense that Christians like the shared-values / common-culture part of Christmas I would begin with like every single Christmas story, book, film, narrative, or platitude ever, all of which include some variant on "this is the season where we all think [insert feel-good Christmas stuff here], every man woman and child" and then total strangers just-for-once join arms and soak in the glow of the communal spirit of the season.

Seriously, though, I can't believe you're asking me for a source on the contention that (duh again) part of the purpose of holidays is to openly reinforce shared values and beliefs and forge social connections among the people celebrating them. I also can't believe you'd pick that, of all things, to argue with, seeing as that's basically a compliment, or at least me trying to empathize with the Christian point of view and figure out what exactly about their experience of Christmas is being diminished by saying "Happy Holidays." And the best I can come up with is that it's totally warm-and-fuzzy reassuring to feel like everyone around you, the entire society, is being bathed in the spirit of a feel-good holiday, and that no matter how much we disagree or are suspicious of one another, at least we can all unite and agree about this one basic thing. That's a really natural thing for people to want. But it turns out that we don't all celebrate the same holidays, and so it's just basic courtesy not to try to force other people into your "everyone loves Christmas" tableau, in exactly the same way that it's basic courtesy not to cram apple pie down the throats of people who don't eat apples. (You can thank me later for not using "your mom" in that analogy.)

nabiscothingy, Friday, 9 December 2005 08:04 (twenty years ago)

Funny that people who fled persecution were guilty of a lot of the same insanity once they got over here.

By "funny," I assume you mean "entirely predictable."

But yeah, states are full of fun stuff. Tennessee state constitution, Article IX, Sec. 2:

No atheist shall hold a civil office.--No person who denies the being of God, or a future state of rewards and punishments, shall hold any office in the civil department of this State.

The other people disqualified under that article are ministers -- because they shouldn't be "diverted from the great duties of their functions" -- and duelists.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Friday, 9 December 2005 08:10 (twenty years ago)

the reason that states could have laws that restricted religious conduct was because it was originally held that the bill of rights applied only to the FEDERAL government (see barron v. baltimore, 32 U.S. 243 (1833)). it wasn't till well after the civil war that the Supreme Court began to hold that (at first) certain bill of rights guarantees were applicable to the individual states; and not until 1947 (in the case of adamson v. california, 322 U.S. 46), that the Court specifically held that the 14th amendment required that the states respect ALL rights specified in the 14th amendment (this is known as the "incorporation doctrine").

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 9 December 2005 08:20 (twenty years ago)

all specified rights in the BILL OF RIGHTS, i meant.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 9 December 2005 08:23 (twenty years ago)

yeah nabisco, but that is not a part of conservative Christianity (being bibically based.) You keep saying "Christians" do this or that, but you are defining Christians in a way that lets you argue the most. I dislike mostly everything that you say "Christians" do probably even more than you, but I don't take those negative things as representative of Christianity or Christian ideals like you do.

Thomas Jefferson helped create a country that I (still) really like living in.
I would think John Calvin is one of the people with the biggest influence on the creation of America.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 9 December 2005 08:23 (twenty years ago)

duelists?

thor heyerdahl (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 9 December 2005 08:25 (twenty years ago)

I would think John Calvin is one of the people with the biggest influence on the creation of America.

Really? I don't see his signature on the Declaration of Independence.

*Jazz Douchebag* Berman (Hurting), Friday, 9 December 2005 08:26 (twenty years ago)

yeah, but 70% of the "founding fathers" were Calvinists. It's a lot of Calvin's ideas from the Bible that gives the philosopical basis for the freedom and liberty America has.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 9 December 2005 08:31 (twenty years ago)

What is your point, exactly?

*Jazz Douchebag* Berman (Hurting), Friday, 9 December 2005 08:32 (twenty years ago)

that he eats at chick-fil-a.

thor heyerdahl (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 9 December 2005 08:36 (twenty years ago)

i eat at chick-fil-a, man. it's delicious!

latebloomer: The Corridor (Yes, The Corridor) (latebloomer), Friday, 9 December 2005 08:41 (twenty years ago)

What is your point, exactly?

That the influence of Christianity is not as bad as it appears if you just look at all the complaints about it.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 9 December 2005 08:44 (twenty years ago)

I don't really think it's relevant here whether some founding ideals of America have ancestry in Chrstian thought. The topic at hand is secularism in the public sphere. America is not a Christian country and will become one over my dead body.

*Jazz Douchebag* Berman (Hurting), Friday, 9 December 2005 08:46 (twenty years ago)

I'm really interested in the US version of this debate because of the connection to constitutional law etc. People seem to have thought about it and know which camp they're in. In the UK, it seems to me that most people don't think that much about it and that's why they're surprised when someone expresses reservations about 'merry christmas'.

That the influence of Christianity is not as bad as it appears if you just look at all the complaints about it.

I don't really know what you mean by this. But I'm assuming you mean that nobody has any genuine complaints about Christianity, they're just being haters, and if anyone does have a complaint it isn't really about true Christianity cos that's about eternal salvation and not about oppressing people. Well excuse me for suggesting that religion in general and Christianity in particular (among many others) have caused some of the world's biggest problems and if I associate religion with bigotry and oppression, I don't think I'm too off the mark.

beanz (beanz), Friday, 9 December 2005 09:53 (twenty years ago)

Christian/Catholic/Muslim/Hindu/Buddhist/Pastafarian/Other (Please specify _______________)

Pastafarian!

http://intempestiva.blogsome.com/images/pastafarian.jpg

Christians can say "Happy Christmas" to each other.
They can also say "Happy Holidays" if they're in a secular environment and give a shit about offending people.
Non-Christians can say whatever the fuck they like and shouldn't be under any obligation to say "Happy Christmas" but really shouldn't get too uppity about "insensitive" Christians saying it.
Corporate/government/presidential greetings that are not aimed at an entirely Christian audience shouldn't say "Happy Christmas".

Fair enough?

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 9 December 2005 10:27 (twenty years ago)

sounds fair to me.

ken c (ken c), Friday, 9 December 2005 10:28 (twenty years ago)

I think that just about covers it. Tea, anyone?

beanz (beanz), Friday, 9 December 2005 10:36 (twenty years ago)

you may be alienating non-tea drinkers here by not offering them a beverage that they may want to drink.

ken c (ken c), Friday, 9 December 2005 10:45 (twenty years ago)

second-gen scandi chixor in minnesota

I lived in the midwest so long that this got me all hot 'n' bothered

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Friday, 9 December 2005 11:07 (twenty years ago)

hat and bathered, you betcha

http://www.cineclub.de/images/1996/fargo.7.jpg

thor heyerdahl (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 9 December 2005 11:19 (twenty years ago)

conservative Christianity (being bibically based.)

Once again, and i'm typing this knowing that it will fall on deaf eyes but I'm put it out there anyway. Clarifying that a form of Christianity is "biblically based" is a non-starter; ALL forms of (modern) Christianity come from the bible, including the liberal/spiritual progressive forms of it. The different sides tend to emphasize the different parts of it, and only one of them tends to be honest about the fact that different interpretations of a (repeatedly) translated text are possible.

When conservative politicos use that phrase, it usually works among the same lines as it does in the Left Behind books; trying to separate the True Believers out from everybody else, claiming to be the only correct group with authority, etc. "well, my views come from the bible! so obviously I’m correct and we should go ahead and cut that funding for food stamps."

You keep saying "Christians" do this or that, but you are defining Christians in a way that lets you argue the most. I dislike mostly everything that you say "Christians" do probably even more than you, but I don't take those negative things as representative of Christianity or Christian ideals like you do.

What? You mean that using the catch-all term "christians"(and, by extension, describing something as "christian") can be inaccurate as it refers to several different flavors of beliefs amongst over a billion folks on this globe? Whodathunkit?

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

in other news, after blowing a good $11.05 at the dollar store, my cube is now decorated for Christmas.

Hooray.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

Nabisco's strawmen Christians. I thought I might have to search a bit for it, but NO SIR!

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 9 December 2005 17:33 (twenty years ago)

awesome.
m.

msp (mspa), Friday, 9 December 2005 17:36 (twenty years ago)

yeah, but 70% of the "founding fathers" were Calvinists. It's a lot of Calvin's ideas from the Bible that gives the philosopical basis for the freedom and liberty America has.

Laughing my head off.

It would be equally defensible to credit Hengist and Horsa since 100% of the founding fathers spoke English and without H & H we'd be speaking some form of Brythonic.

M. White (Miguelito), Friday, 9 December 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)

Nairn I understand your frustration here but you're basically arguing with yourself. I never said a single thing on this thread about what constitutes "true" Biblical Christianity, or what constitutes a "true" Christian ideal -- I'm talking strictly about what actual Christians in my country do and believe, in practice. This is because I am breathtakingly uninterested in what constitutes a "true" Christianity. You are very, very interested in that topic, which I actually think is really cool and commendable -- like, I honestly appreciate that for you Christianity involves thinking hard about what the true core values of the faith are, and how they should apply to you in the world today. But let's be clear that I'm just not talking about that at all. I'm talking about what Christians -- meaning not "true, perfect Christians" but just "people who identify as Christian" -- seem to be thinking about when they go on these Reclaim Christmas kicks.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 9 December 2005 17:40 (twenty years ago)

I mean, whenever people on this board say "Christians do/think X, Y, and Z" you immediately come in arguing that they're not really being Christians, or that they shouldn't reflect badly on "true" Christian ideals. And I can totally understand that -- you're trying to remind us not to judge the belief system by the opinions of just some people, right? But you have to understand that we're just not doing that. Usually in this conversations when we say "Christians" we're just talking about a particular American social group (and when we say "Christian conversatives" we're talking about a really specific part of it). We're not saying these people represent what Christ might have believed. But they identify as Christians, and their religion informs a lot of their political and social ideas, so there is no better way to identify them -- as a social group -- than, say, "Christians conservatives."

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 9 December 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)

Oops!

Lars and Jagger (Ex Leon), Friday, 9 December 2005 17:53 (twenty years ago)

It's a lot of Calvin's ideas from the Bible that gives the philosopical basis for the freedom and liberty America has.

http://www.tattoofun.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/ultimatedecals/UD0013sm.jpg

walter kranz (walterkranz), Friday, 9 December 2005 17:53 (twenty years ago)

Nabisco your good faith as always is really heartening, but what you're describing is one of the American Christian's favorite tricks - anything Christians do that sucks/sucked, well, just say that it had nothing to with actually Christianity = problem solved! As far as I'm concerned, and I think as far as any reasonable person is concerned, Christianity = the beliefs and actions of the body of Christ in the world. An ideology is a dynamic, right, not just the dogma.

xpost that Calvin at the cross thing gets me so bad - "Ahh, Calvin, after a lifetime of peeing on Ford logos, you must eventually get right with God"

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Friday, 9 December 2005 17:56 (twenty years ago)

One of the odder bits of the Calvin-praying thing is how random it seems. It's like out of all the comic strip iconography, they went for the strip where one would thinkg the creator deliberately chafes at both the bootleg marketing and the implications of that particular sticker.

But, as BN mentions, perhaps folks were so used to associating bootleg Calvin stickers with the back windows of american pickup trucks that it seemed natural to extend it to other things that scamp Calvin probably wouldn't do.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 18:01 (twenty years ago)

But yeah, why Calvin? Why not Peanuts or B.C., which has overtly used Scripture in the strips?

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 18:02 (twenty years ago)

or Cheech Wizard!

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Friday, 9 December 2005 18:04 (twenty years ago)

Yeah but Banana in terms of this conversation I guess I don't really care about the distinction. Like if someone believes "true Christianity" is better than what lots of Christians actually do, that's kinda his business and religion and it's pointless to try and intrude on that. Because in the end -- in terms of this conversation -- I just really don't care what "true Christian values" are. I'm not even offering an opinion on that. I'm talking strictly about what a specific social group of Christians-in-practice seem to be thinking; it matters not a whit to me what debates they and Nairn might have about the spirit of Christ or the teachings of the Bible.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 9 December 2005 18:14 (twenty years ago)

I'm talking strictly about what a specific social group of Christians-in-practice seem to be thinking; it matters not a whit to me what debates they and Nairn might have about the spirit of Christ or the teachings of the Bible.

yup, i'm with you on this one.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 18:20 (twenty years ago)

HEY LOOK NAIRN IGNORED KINGFISH POINTING SOMETHING OUT

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Friday, 9 December 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)

ILX IN BEING PREDICTABLE SHOCKER

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE BUTT (nabisco), Friday, 9 December 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

From that ABC story:

"For over two millennia, Christmas has carried the message that God is with us," President Bush said at the tree-lighting ceremony.

or...

President Bush today displayed a marked but hardly surprising ignorance of the history of the Christmas holiday, while participating in a pagan ceremony derived from ancient midwinter sun worship.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Friday, 9 December 2005 19:05 (twenty years ago)

or...

President Bush delivered a coded message to his base, who care less about the appearance of solecism than the appearance that they are the Party's chosen people.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 9 December 2005 19:32 (twenty years ago)

festivus vs chrismukkah FITE!

sunny successor (katharine), Friday, 9 December 2005 19:35 (twenty years ago)

the influence of Christianity is not as bad as it appears if you just look at all the complaints about it

But this particular imbroglio here has precisely NOTHING to do with "the influence of Christianity" - on history, on the US of A, or on seasonal customs.

This has to do with the influence of douchebags. I'm agin'em.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 9 December 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)

Fuck it, I'll repost this.

What is wrong in this photo?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/12/images/20051206-4_p120605kh-0147-515h.jpg

President George W. Bush participates in the Menorah lighting at the White House with Rabbi Joshua Skoff and members of the Skoff family, Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2005, prior to the annual White House Hanukkah reception. White House photo by Kimberlee Hewitt

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)

it's not yet the fifth night of the festival?

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 9 December 2005 19:48 (twenty years ago)

TS: Calvin vs. Rousseau

The notion that the Founding Fathers were nominal adherents of a Christian faith isn't in question. Nor is the Puritan legacy of American Exceptionalism.

The notion that the Founding Fathers were crypto-Fundamentalists with a literal belief in the King James Edition is ludicrous.

It's also as beside the point as Constitutional Originalism. Dude, the Founding Fathers of Rome were understood by custom to be of Trojan descent and raised by wolves, but Italians today don't howl at the moon or root for USC.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 9 December 2005 19:48 (twenty years ago)

getting warmer

xpost

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 19:49 (twenty years ago)

Calvin Coolidge should be helping out?

walter kranz (walterkranz), Friday, 9 December 2005 19:53 (twenty years ago)

You're not supposed to have real lights on?

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Friday, 9 December 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)

The answer, as one of my smirking jews on my LJ posted, is thus:

a) It isn't Hanukah yet.

b) If it were the first night, you'd light one.

c) You light right to left, you dumb motherfucker.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 20:00 (twenty years ago)

It's also as beside the point as Constitutional Originalism.

And even Originalism does the "Christian nation" crowd no good. As a zillion historians have pointed out, if the drafters had wanted Jesus in the Constitution, they would have put him there. It's not like anyone was stopping them. The ACLU was not at the constitutional convention.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Friday, 9 December 2005 20:15 (twenty years ago)

I'll give him the benefit of the doubt on that last one -- he's lighting in stage directions, for the right-to-left benefit of the viewing audience.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 9 December 2005 20:17 (twenty years ago)

Plus I mean yeah right, like Bush is going to do nightly candle-lighting photo-ops for Hanukah? This is basically like having your birthday party on Friday because it just ain't gonna work for everyone on Tuesday night. Not that I wouldn't love to see all local rabbis tell Bush "No, Hanukah starts later, if you want pluralism points for doing some menorah-lighting then you get your ass down here sometime when we're actually doing it." I mean, there's like a week-long window there, it's not hard.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 9 December 2005 20:21 (twenty years ago)

The big offense is really using the scheduling to turn Hanukah into some little-brother Christmas variant -- like they do the tree, then they have to go do some kind of "Jewish Christmas" equal-time lip-service during the same week or two. The more I think about it, Christian attention to Hanukah is really creepily involved with basically trying to pretend that Jews celebrate Christmas, too -- like, Hanukah has to be projected into some quaint simultaneous variation on Christmas just to buck up that we-all-believe notion I was talking about earlier.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 9 December 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)

There's that, too. I was just initially struck by the oddness of the photo(didn't look that closely on first pass).

It was just the history of the guy spending years of pandering to a particular subset of conservative protestants(the same set whose leaders are trying to score political points in the current commercialization drive for Xmas) to then actually admit that, oh yeah, there are actually other religious folks around here.

Plus, that's one big-ass menorah.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 20:28 (twenty years ago)

Oh what in the holy hell is he doing, it's not even NEARLY Hannukah yet. For fuck's sake.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Friday, 9 December 2005 20:30 (twenty years ago)

meanwhile, down in Georgia:

Two Georgia lawmakers filed bills Wednesday that would expressly prohibit government agencies, including school systems, from barring their employees and students from saying "Merry Christmas," "Happy Hanukkah," or any other expression relating to the celebration of a holiday. The bills probably will be debated in the 2006 legislative session.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 20:31 (twenty years ago)

Hanukah has to be projected into some quaint simultaneous variation on Christmas just to buck up that we-all-believe notion I was talking about earlier.

exactly. I think this is exactly why they held that ceremony. "Hanukah is basically a jewish christmas, right? And we had tree lighting ceremony yesterday, so let's light this thing up tonight."

I mean, hey, at least they did this, that's a start. But it does speak to the whole massive cultural ignorance thing going on, like the "explaining Sunni/Shia distinctions to the guy during the 2003 Super Bowl" thing.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 20:35 (twenty years ago)

See on some level we reallyt shouldn't need to bar people from saying stuff like that. Mostly it's really nice, no matter what religion you are. You go around wishing everybody a happy whatever they celebrate, and if they wish you a happy something you don't celebrate -- like if somebody wishes me Happy Hanukah -- that's pretty cool, too, and you're like "right back you, man." It could be totally open and happy for everyone.

But so you know who fucks this up, though: Christians themselves! They're the only ones who take it too far. They're the only ones who can wish you "Merry Christmas" in some sort of cold meaningful way that implies there's something wrong with you. They're the only ones who'll use their holiday as a big open door for evangelism, and they're the only ones who have the opportunity or inclination to totally lord their holiday over everyone and generally be dicks about it. So if we have to ask public employees not to start up with the Christmas talk, it's not because there's anything wrong with saying "Merry Christmas" -- it's because there's always gonna be assholes who take it way too far and start cramming Jesus down everyone's throat, and so the only plausible rule becomes that everyone just has to shut up about it altogether.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 9 December 2005 20:40 (twenty years ago)

What is this Super Bowl thing of which you speak?

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 9 December 2005 20:42 (twenty years ago)

XP: Which follows the Kindergarten School of Social Management, "If you can't take turns petting the rabbit nicely he'll have to go back to his forest home -- and then you won't have any pets at all."

Laurel (Laurel), Friday, 9 December 2005 20:46 (twenty years ago)

So if we have to ask public employees not to start up with the Christmas talk, it's not because there's anything wrong with saying "Merry Christmas" -- it's because there's always gonna be assholes who take it way too far and start cramming Jesus down everyone's throat, and so the only plausible rule becomes that everyone just has to shut up about it altogether.

yeah it's just a prophylaxis ain't it 'cause if you let 'em start saying "Merry Christmas" next thing you know they'll be asking "what's wrong with wanting to start a discussion about the REASON FOR THE SEASON" and believe me, speaking as a former nurse who once saw his in-charge telling a guy who was experiencing auditory hallucinations to "let Jesus into [his] heart," if you let people get started with that stuff in workplaces or schools they'll be up to all sorts of monkeyshines in no time

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Friday, 9 December 2005 20:54 (twenty years ago)

believe me, speaking as a former nurse who once saw his in-charge telling a guy who was experiencing auditory hallucinations to "let Jesus into [his] heart," if you let people get started with that stuff in workplaces or schools they'll be up to all sorts of monkeyshines in no time.

1000% OTM.

as is nabisco -- precisely NONE of this would be an issue had the jesus freaks not made it one themselves.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 9 December 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)

But I'm not even so sure it's the Jesus freaks. I mean, they'll get on board with it, sure, and there's local skirmishes here and there over creches on the courthouse lawn and whatever, but this seems to be mostly driven by Fox News. O'Reilly and Gibson in particular latched onto this over the last few years. It's a shtick. Gibson's selling a book, O'Reilly's selling himself. It feels way more manufactured than the creationism fights. I don't think even most megachurch congregations give much of a shit about "Happy Holidays." Or at least they didn't until very recently. I blame Rupert Murdoch for this more than the James Dobson crowd (though of course they're happy to have one more fundraising plea: "Help us save Christmas!").

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Friday, 9 December 2005 21:05 (twenty years ago)

I guess it kinda sucks that ordinary Christians would have to feel like they were being driven underground, especially when 90% of them would just say "Merry Christmas" as a total friendly commonplace ... but what are you gonna do? (I.e. what set of rules can allow them to do that without allowing some wacko bank teller to say "Hail Satan" or "It's my belief that the Jews are ruining America" to everybody who wants to make a deposit?)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 9 December 2005 21:08 (twenty years ago)

i heard on the radio this morning that churches in arkansas have been getting requests from their paritioners to not hold christmas day services because christmas falls on a sunday this year. Some churches went ahead and asked their congregations and there resulted a resounding 'NO!' for holding christmas day services, so all services, in these churches, have been cancelled. GOD FORBID ANYONE SHOULD HAVE TO GO TO CHURCH ON A SUNDAY

To make this even more convoluted the church explains that god is omnipresent, therefore you dont need to be in a church on christmas to have him with you. If thats the case, why go to church ever??

Anyway, Jesus is going to be super pissed when everyones a no show for his birthday party.

sunny successor (katharine), Friday, 9 December 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)

To make this even more convoluted the church explains that god is omnipresent, therefore you dont need to be in a church on christmas to have him with you. If thats the case, why go to church ever??

Because it's important to be part of a "community of believers" or "body of worship" or what-the-hell-ever for teaching, support, fellowship, and accountability.

And I would guess that cancelling services for Christmas Sunday has to do with an interesting movement toward making a priority of family time, which is a sort of heartland-interest thing but not necessarily a religious one -- just that people's schedules are getting crowded (work, school, kids' sports & extra curriculars, etc) and various communities/groups of parents have started "fighting back" by putting for ex, family vacations ahead of Junior's football practice and getting Coach to agree, or not scheduling PTA meetings until after the general dinner time, etc.

Laurel (Laurel), Friday, 9 December 2005 21:21 (twenty years ago)

Midnight Mass is pretty much the #1 thing I miss about the Mother Church - the feeling at that service is something really special

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Friday, 9 December 2005 21:24 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, i was gunna say. did anybody go to christmas day services? My family goes to church on Christmas Eve and has for like the last 15 years.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 21:36 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, but there's the midnight service the day before and THEN wake up and serve breakfast, do stockings, get everyone showered & dressed up & back to church since it's Sunday, then come home around noon and put dinner in the oven & prepare to host two dozen family members for dinner & other festivities OR come home around noon and pack presents & pot roast into the car & drive some number of hours to Grandma's house...you get the picture. A mother could lose her mind refereeing a day like that.

Laurel (Laurel), Friday, 9 December 2005 21:39 (twenty years ago)

my parents used to do the midnight mass thing, too. i once got in trouble by suggesting that, instead of going to midnight mass then i should stay home and watch the Pope say mass on tv. i mean, how was our little church gonna trump the Pope?!?

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 9 December 2005 21:44 (twenty years ago)

Also, about the Super Bowl thing, there's an anecdote out there that I've trying to find better citation for(Al Franken mentions it in his latest book, it's repeated here and in the Assassin's Gate book), about how one of the INC/iraqi expatriate guys was invited to the white house to watch the Super Bowl with Dubya and his guys. The expatriate remarked that he found himself explaining the differences betwee Kurds, Sunni, & Shia iraqis(different religions, different ethnicities, etc) to our Commander-in-Chief.

Months after this got out and starting circulating, the expatriate reversed himself and said it never happened.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 21:49 (twenty years ago)

oh yeah, and this was on earlier this week:

http://www.crooksandliars.com/images/2005/12/04/FoxWarOnXmas1.jpg

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 21:59 (twenty years ago)

the candle light vigil thing on the eve was always a magical night. i like to hope it wasn't because we always opened gifts afterwards, but you never know.

i really miss the christmas eve service. and the advent season stuff. we go to a church that's sort of obsessive about first century practices and since there is no santa claus passage, we don't really do anything special other than a fellowship christmas party in early december. it's fun, but lacks the general spirit of the seasonal treatment you get in a methodist church.

m.

msp (mspa), Friday, 9 December 2005 22:02 (twenty years ago)

The crawl on that CNN capture makes it priceless (as intended, I assume).

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 9 December 2005 22:11 (twenty years ago)

Fox, you mean. CNN has picked up the "controversy" a little too, but Fox is the command bunker of the War on Christmas.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Friday, 9 December 2005 22:24 (twenty years ago)

Other Christmas Eve church revelations: my dad can't sign to save his life.

also, about that crawl, Larry Johnson wrote about that kinda thing today. "Shia Pets for Christmas" & whatnot.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 22:32 (twenty years ago)

can't SING, dammit.

oh well, close enough.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 9 December 2005 22:43 (twenty years ago)

Fox, you mean. CNN has picked up the "controversy" a little too, but Fox is the command bunker of the War on Christmas.

Not to mention the home of the guy with a book to flog. But yes, Fox. Is there a word for typos you make with your brain?

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 9 December 2005 22:54 (twenty years ago)

what happenned when oreilly tried to go after the Daily Show

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Saturday, 10 December 2005 02:58 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, the "Osama Homo-bortion Pot & Commie Jizzporium" was a nice touch.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Saturday, 10 December 2005 03:03 (twenty years ago)

it's a phrase desperately needed for these times

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Saturday, 10 December 2005 03:04 (twenty years ago)

Once again, and i'm typing this knowing that it will fall on deaf eyes but I'm put it out there anyway. Clarifying that a form of Christianity is "biblically based" is a non-starter; ALL forms of (modern) Christianity come from the bible, including the liberal/spiritual progressive forms of it. The different sides tend to emphasize the different parts of it, and only one of them tends to be honest about the fact that different interpretations of a (repeatedly) translated text are possible.

ok, then our differences are reletavisim and absolutism. I believe there is an absolute true Christianity as defined by God. Relativism falls into infinite regression easyily. I'm starting with the absolute fundamental of God and how he reveals himself. Man do faultily interpret things and there are many differences between men, but I believe there is an absolute truth and goodness that can never be reached in this world, but can be strived for


I'm talking strictly about what actual Christians in my country do and believe, in practice.

Yeah, it is frustrating seeing the picture that other people (and the media) often paint about Christianity because I rarely see that from actual Christians I know. But I guess I tend to flee from "false prophets" as much as I can. Anyway, I agree with you.

I think as far as any reasonable person is concerned, Christianity = the beliefs and actions of the body of Christ in the world.

The thing is that a big Christian belief is that Christian actions will be faulty because Christians are humen and sinful. Pointing at all the sinful actions Christians do as a justification of disregarding the ideals is not valid. A doctor is not for healing the sick. Christianity is not for healing the righteous.

Generally I like to jump on board with criticizing all the faults in Christian action because those are things they should improve on, but when venturing into theology I'm still an absolutist as in beliving in the inerrency of the scripture.

re: Calvanism. I would think the idea of depravity of man leads to checks and balances and not letting too much power into too few people. Also see the Puritans and Mayflower Compact or read some primary colonist sources ( http://www.homeschoolacademy.com/vlibrary/ACL.htm ) to see how much the basis of the America government is in Christian thought.

A Nairn (moretap), Saturday, 10 December 2005 03:33 (twenty years ago)

Ok, Gypsy & Nabisco, you guys can take over here. I'm done.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Saturday, 10 December 2005 03:39 (twenty years ago)

I bet Christianity has a net loss when it comes to souls Nairn has driven away vs. converted.

I do feel guilty for getting any perverse amusement out of it (Rock Hardy), Saturday, 10 December 2005 03:57 (twenty years ago)

It makes me want to bash my head againts a spiked wall that people think everything on earth was influenced by man except this one old book. how one can attempt to make logical arguments when at base they make this totally illogical contention is beyond me.

oops (Oops), Saturday, 10 December 2005 04:25 (twenty years ago)

Nairn, thanks for the link. Agreed: many of the colonists were Puritans. It's just not relevant. At all.

Also, the part where Benjamin Franklin advocates the paper bag rule for banging old broads is still funny 300 years later!

"...covering all above with a Basket, and regarding only what is below the Girdle, it is impossible of two Women to know an old from a young one. And as in the dark all Cats are grey, the Pleasure of corporal Enjoyment with an Old Woman is at least equal, and frequently superior, every Knack being by Practice capable of Improvement."

LULZ. These Christians know how to party.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Saturday, 10 December 2005 05:01 (twenty years ago)

Puritans weren't too big on christmas, either, as alluded to upthread

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Saturday, 10 December 2005 05:04 (twenty years ago)

haha - looks like you've got some life left in you yet!

rogermexico (rogermexico), Saturday, 10 December 2005 05:23 (twenty years ago)

i know, i know. i just can't stay away.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Saturday, 10 December 2005 05:28 (twenty years ago)

It is absurd to suggest that John Calvin is responsible for the idea that men are flawed and require checks on their behavior.

*Jazz Douchebag* Berman (Hurting), Saturday, 10 December 2005 07:14 (twenty years ago)

And anyway, it's absurd to suggest that the influence of Christian thinkers on our system of government makes the government in any way Christian. FWIW, one could also cite the influence of Hammurabi's Code, the old testament, the Magna Carta, enlightenment philosophy, Adam Smith, etc.

*Jazz Douchebag* Berman (Hurting), Saturday, 10 December 2005 07:19 (twenty years ago)

My favorite example is always the Senate. There's no Senate in the Bible, but there was one in pagan Rome. Ergo, clearly the founders intended a pagan government.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Saturday, 10 December 2005 07:36 (twenty years ago)

saddam was the "president" of iraq = iraq under saddam was clearly a democracy!

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 10 December 2005 08:53 (twenty years ago)

Let's face it, those of us who are not Christian slaveowners with powdered perfumed wigs have hopelessly corrupted the nation's founding vision.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Saturday, 10 December 2005 09:09 (twenty years ago)

Hurting, remember teh iroquois!

rogermexico (rogermexico), Saturday, 10 December 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)

A very obvious but nevertheless otm column in the Washington Post.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 11 December 2005 06:43 (twenty years ago)

13 days to christsmas day
christmas day
christmas day
13 days to christmas day
silver shamrock

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 11 December 2005 23:42 (twenty years ago)

this grows embarassing. dudes should be ashamed. they've hijacked Jesus for their intolerance fest. i mean, for crying out, it's somewhat generally agreed that Jesus himself celebrated Hanukkah. so retarded.
m.

msp (mspa), Monday, 12 December 2005 06:38 (twenty years ago)

True. But in the annals of Christian intolerance this all ranks pretty low. They can't tie people to the rack or burn them alive for not saying "Merry Christmas" with appropriate reverence, which counts as a victory for civilization.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 12 December 2005 06:44 (twenty years ago)

Just for this, I think we SHOULD launch a real war on Christmas.

Current Mood: Embarrassing Christian Laettner (Matt Chesnut), Monday, 12 December 2005 06:51 (twenty years ago)

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/12/12.html#a6285

shouting, "we tortured an elf," trying to bring up the talking point that the Nazis banned christmas, etc.

all great fun in this culture of ours

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 06:31 (twenty years ago)

I enjoyed that clip. In addition to be funny, the guy did a fairly good job of pointing out the ridiculousness of the "War on Christmas," though I think he could have been a little less shrill (I know he was going for that Fox News style, but still.) Also, why do they have to pick the most stereotypically Jewish looking and sounding man on the planet?

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 15:51 (twenty years ago)

Maybe this should be a separate thread, but anyway: I knew about the "religion in America is a mile wide and an inch deep," but I didn't know the mile was this wide: 94 % ?

StanM (StanM), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 19:52 (twenty years ago)

what set of rules can allow them to do that without allowing some wacko bank teller to say "Hail Satan"

the world would be a much more enjoyable place if "Hail Satan" was a common greeting.

latebloomer: Deutsch Bag (latebloomer), Tuesday, 13 December 2005 19:56 (twenty years ago)

a charlie brown kwanzaa:

http://www.jbmconsults.com/movcbk.html

"xmas, as in malcolm x-mas!"

NSFW.
m.

msp (mspa), Thursday, 15 December 2005 07:01 (twenty years ago)

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/43438

"Activist Judge Cancels Christmas"

kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 15 December 2005 07:06 (twenty years ago)

um... am I a bad person because that Charlie Brown video made me laugh until I cried?

Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Thursday, 15 December 2005 07:50 (twenty years ago)

ugh, I couldn't make it past a minute of that.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 15 December 2005 07:54 (twenty years ago)

you're not a bad person, though :)

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 15 December 2005 07:54 (twenty years ago)

c'mon. that was some funny muhfuggin shit.

Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Thursday, 15 December 2005 07:57 (twenty years ago)

"let's lock legs and swap gravy."

see, it's not just the juxtaposition of black slang and Charlie Brown that's funny all by itself. It's the inventive use of (as far as I know, totally invented) black slang.

Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Thursday, 15 December 2005 08:04 (twenty years ago)

John Gibson freaks out on the air again

kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 22 December 2005 07:13 (twenty years ago)

you guys are all f***in retarded

christmas is over evolved and all u secualar atheist/non-christians can treat dec 24/25th as a another day, just dont ruin it for us.......im sorry if it seems unfair, but how do u think i feel when i cant hear merry christmas in the malls anymore......now its all happy holidays and flippin seasons greetings..........wtf.....how hollow is that........it doesnt take a genius to realize that this world with out the the love of christ is gonna get any better.......jesus is the ONLY way and im not being bias cause i was raised by a jew and an atheist and now i cant imagine my life without christ.....

so please, do urself a favour, get ur opinions on all this religions shit out of the window and realize that christ doesnt want us to follow him in a form of formal religion, nooo, he just wants to help u and develop a friendship with him and guide back to our heavenly father.....look, im not a freak......im engineering genius with an IQ much greater than 99.4% of the population....with that being said, listen to ur heart and have faith for a man who had faith in his father's people.....he died for us, i think thats all that matters.......

amen


merry christmas

Rom G Chehader, Saturday, 24 December 2005 02:37 (twenty years ago)

tell us more

kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Saturday, 24 December 2005 02:45 (twenty years ago)

jesus loves us so much that he has unleashed armies of retards to spread his love

I'M SORRY I'M SORRY I KNOW IT'S WRONG TO GENERALIZE AND THAT MANY OF THE WORLD'S GREAT THINKERS WERE TRANSFORMED BY THE MESSAGE OF LOVE THEY FOUND IN CHRIST'S TEACHINGS BUT ON THE EVIDENCE OF THE PAST THIRTY YEARS OR SO, SHIT HAS GONE STRAIGHT TOXIC

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Saturday, 24 December 2005 03:37 (twenty years ago)

it doesnt matter what people have to say about all this xmas junk and being politially correct, but it all boils down to a few thoughts:

first off, if it wasnt for christ, there would be no such thing as freedom of speech and democracy.....if u dont know what im talking about, think of all the countries that have communists laws or very 'crappy' political systems or very limited freedom.......china, n korea, saudi arabia, etc etc, what do these countries have in common? the majority religion of these countries are not christian...i can go on and on about this, but im faithful that no one is dumb enough for me to explain further

second, if it wasnt for atheists and their 'hollow'/white dry bread lifestyles, i wouldnt be so greatful that i am a faithful and devoted follower of christ (note i didnt say christian).

yes i believe religion just like many things has its 'ups' and 'downs', but all that matters is what u can take out of it, not how well u can follow it....right?

think of this: it might be geographically bias, but picture a hurst towing a U-HUAL, or lugguage being thrown in with a casket, does anyone ever see it happining? obviously not.....why? because its blunt that when u die, these things have no value, all u get to take with you is ur soul.......not the DVD boxsets or the creative secular things u filled ur life with to avoid feeling hollow.

if i had to summerize all this, what i have to say is this:

the moment ur out of ur mother's womb, we only being to start aging and dying....what varies us is how long we live and what we do while we are 'alive'....things will happen to us while we are alive and we dont have any real control over that, however we have control over what do about these things.....this is what develops our character/soul/mind.....our true selves....being secular doesnt necessarly make u a bad person, but it makes that jorney back to 'death' much harder and longer and much more confusing....now when ur 'dead', ur so-called judged.....givin that u've 'experienced' life to the fullist and 'lived each day like its ur last' u should be able to come up with some 'nice' answers to whatever God might wip at you.....now just incase ur being 'judged' and ur a so-called atheist, or a jew or a muslim, buddist, christian, whatever, u should be able to answer these questions much like a student in a course writing an exam, everything on the exam should be do-able, its just a case of studying correctly, hence, living ur life correctly...get me point?

anyways, i dont know if im writing too much, im getting tired and im cooled and i think that by the time i check this site again, i will get responses from all walks of beliefs and ideas.....but its not gonna change my christ

cheers

any canadians bytw?

rgc, Saturday, 24 December 2005 05:39 (twenty years ago)

yes japan was in an awful mess before they saw the light of the lord jesus christ

oops (Oops), Saturday, 24 December 2005 06:01 (twenty years ago)

but im faithful that no one is dumb enough for me to explain further

condescentarianism

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 24 December 2005 06:13 (twenty years ago)

a protagonist person needs an antagonistic character to truly understand himself....

so thanks my dicitionary!

rgc, Saturday, 24 December 2005 06:41 (twenty years ago)

Why are you looking for Jesus at the money changers? You want god, go to a church!

nickn (nickn), Saturday, 24 December 2005 06:56 (twenty years ago)

"shit has gone straight toxic" is my new favourite thing to say.

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Saturday, 24 December 2005 08:01 (twenty years ago)

I love how these folks have such a simple, easy solution to the difficulties of pluralism and a multi-faith society: convert! Accept Jesus! Then we can all be Christians and say "Merry Christmas" and everyone will be happy!

nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 24 December 2005 08:14 (twenty years ago)

there would be no such thing as freedom of speech and democracy

tell us more

kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Saturday, 24 December 2005 08:16 (twenty years ago)

yeah, those Athenians who invented democracy two thousand years before Christ was born, and who also believed passionately in freedom of speech, they sure were some ruthless communist despots

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Saturday, 24 December 2005 13:04 (twenty years ago)

ok mr straight toxic

first off, bringing up the past.....the democracy back then was based on social status and cutting off body parts if laws were broken..don't give me the bullshit idea that 'true' democracy occured before christ.......even christ himself cured the cut ear of a man who was talking back to the solidiers in the garden....ever watch 'passion of the christ'?

anyways, this whole government thing is all bias thoughts considering that i am canadian and i live in the best set country in the world.......look at the city of toronto, the most diverse etnically, culturly and religously..(stated by the UN)...its crime rates are so low and its all due to the canadian democracy..(not saying its perfect, but its the best out there)....and if u have taken any history, u know the fore-fathers of the canadian government were all greatly devoted men who were followers of christ...all doing things that reflect christs passion and love for his people....

ok, so anyways mr straight toxic and whomever is reading this, im not here to give my 2cents.....im just here to say the truth and give hope to my self and others when i/we feel hopeless.......im not a person who drinks, does drugs nor do unlawful deeds when im feeling confused and depressed.....im a guy who prays, asks his mom and dad for help, and looks for the face of God in everything and anything that is around me.......i keep my opinions simple because theres no need to over explain the truth

i hope that one day u can develop a relationship with Christ and realize that all problems in life are not really problems when u find Christ.........ever watch the movie 'It's a Wonderful Life' by Frank Capra....it's an oldie from the 40's, but gosh darnit its great and shows u what life is all about......

anyhow,

merry christmas

rgc, Saturday, 24 December 2005 17:07 (twenty years ago)

dude, you're Canadian? That makes me feel a little better. I'd hate to think America had a monopoly on such novel historical/religious perspectives.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Saturday, 24 December 2005 17:14 (twenty years ago)

"Novel?" That's straight wisdom, gypsy -- ever watch D.C. Cab?

nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 24 December 2005 17:44 (twenty years ago)

yeah, DC Cab is a great movie

any other great movies people recommend?

rgc, Saturday, 24 December 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)

it's an oldie from the 40's, but gosh darnit its great and shows u what life is all about......

It's either Ned Flanders or born-again Stuart Smalley.

Give me Sufjan or give me credibility (Matt Chesnut), Saturday, 24 December 2005 17:56 (twenty years ago)

the democracy back then was based on social status and cutting off body parts if laws were broken

really? tell us more

kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Saturday, 24 December 2005 18:02 (twenty years ago)

It's a Wonderful Life was one of those rare moments when Capracorn actually worked. I think the other was You Can't Take It With You.

kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Saturday, 24 December 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)

Sure, R! Other movies I think have a lot to say about the world and true Christian living:

Turner & Hooch
The Crush
Seven
Hudson Hawk
American Movie
Liar, Liar
Amistad
Disclosure
Sgt. Bilko

nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 24 December 2005 18:26 (twenty years ago)

im engineering genius with an IQ much greater than 99.4% of the population...

For an engineering genius, I am surprised at your inability to grasp this simple mathematical concept: if your IQ measures in the 99.4 percentile, then it is not "much greater" than someone whose IQ measures in the 99.3 percentile.

But perhaps this boasting was more an expression of your emotional insecurities than your intellectual prowess.

Merry Christmas!

Aimless (Aimless), Saturday, 24 December 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)

I'm sorry I'm seeing this thread (which I have only skimmed very superficially) so late. I'm sorry I'm seeing this thread at all, frankly, because the chances of my not simply going off and saying fuck this and fuck that are very slim. I recommend the current issue of Mother Jones, if it hasn't been mentioned upthread.

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Saturday, 24 December 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)

(I mean the 12/2005 issue. Looks like the current issue is into 06.)

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Saturday, 24 December 2005 19:28 (twenty years ago)

you guys are all f***in retarded [...] i am a faithful and devoted follower of christ

And there, in a nutshell, we have Rom's Christmas message for us all. May he do a little better next year. Amen.

im sorry if it seems unfair, but how do u think i feel when i cant hear merry christmas in the malls anymore......now its all happy holidays and flippin seasons greetings....

I don't understand. If you think non-Christians should not find it irritating when you wish them a "Merry Christmas", why do you feel offended when someone wishes you a "Happy holidays"? This makes no sense.

Is a wish for your happiness an insult where you come from? Is a cordial greeting a grievous sin? If they are not, then what is the source of your offense? Perhaps with all your brain power you should neditate on this for a time until you can make sense of it for me.

Aimless (Aimless), Saturday, 24 December 2005 20:58 (twenty years ago)

He seems to have an intermittant fault with his c, k and u keys. Either that, or he just can't spell 'fuck'.

As far as I can tell, he seems to be objecting to not being allowed to dictate how other people should celebrate things; which is hardly a democratic sentiment.

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Saturday, 24 December 2005 21:03 (twenty years ago)

The fundies are letting the love-thy-brother mask slip. Their brand of salvation doesn't have anything to do with peace on earth, good will to all, or democracy. I wish they'd go find another country to conquer, but of course the US is the biggest prize.

Rom, quit trying to save my soul by force or I'll kick you in the fucking nuts.

I do feel guilty for getting any perverse amusement out of it (Rock Hardy), Saturday, 24 December 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)

i'm wondering what malls he's in that expressly forbid the utterance of "merry christmas"

kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Saturday, 24 December 2005 21:52 (twenty years ago)

Yes. If he so longs to hear it, let it fall from his own merry-wishing lips, as freely as the rain which falls upon the just and the unjust alike.

Aimless (Aimless), Saturday, 24 December 2005 22:07 (twenty years ago)

i'm wondering what malls he's in that expressly forbid the utterance of "merry christmas"

Osama's Homo-bortion Pot & Commie Jizzporium.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Saturday, 24 December 2005 22:12 (twenty years ago)

think of all the countries that have communists laws or very 'crappy' political systems or very limited freedom

This is a fun exercise! Please explain me:

a) Nazi Germany
b) Tsarist Russia
c) ancien regime France
d) etc etc etc blah blah blah

rogermexico (rogermexico), Saturday, 24 December 2005 22:12 (twenty years ago)

Osama's Homo-bortion Pot & Commie Jizzporium.

oh yeah. Their Day-Before-Christmas sales are always Teh Suck.

kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Saturday, 24 December 2005 22:19 (twenty years ago)

wow, i didnt know my messages would get so much attention, i guess i should just calm down with this whole xmas junk and try to be a little more careful, i relize with every 'ying' there will be a 'yang', so all these negative comments are complementry to mine, no problem.....such an issue is not gonna get more senseful if dont take it to the extreme, and thats what we all doing, taking are opinions and comparing/contrasting with others.....all i have to say is that your stupid 'quoting' ability is hypocrysy (i claim to be a hypocryt in many ways myself), much what jesus warned us about, and that all i ultimately hope that we all dont become........yes i claim i have a high IQ, but i only mentioned it just incase people thought i might be some 'stupid' to sociately standards......such things like these webpages remind me of my Mensa Meetings, and that being said, this is all healthy discussion, each opinion and idea on here is just as equal and important as mine, but thats not the issue...the issue is that we are on earth for a blink if a period, dont invest too much in this earth, for we are only leasing it.

anyhow, the only reason why i came on this site and why my intial entry contains signs of anger is because prior to that entry, i just came back from the mall and while i was there, i was in a store (american eagle) and as i was paying for my purchase, i said thank you and merry christmas, and when the girl wanted to say merry christmas back(seeing that she was wearing a cross), she hesitated and said 'merry holidays' confused whether or not her manager that was standing next to her was gonna get mad if she didnt follow company policy and say 'merry christmas'.....thats what got me pissed, and as soon as i got home, i googled 'fucking secularism' and this page was in the search result.....so there you go......thast why i was pissed off and i hope no one quotes me cause quoting me would just prove that you have no argument of ur own, just a reaction to what i say, and if u dont have anything original to say, then dont re-iterate what i did, and no, i wont explain what i write in my comments, i stated above before that i am so-called condescentarianism ...whatever

anyways, merry christmas and i hope you all see the light of christ

and just for the record, to whomever wants to 'kick me in the nut', go ahead........i can practice my football and rugby skills on you considering its the off season and i havent channeled my physically strength on anyone yet for a while ;), besides my girlfriend :)

cheers all and merry christmas.....and like i said, bring on the 'yangs'

-rom

rgc, Saturday, 24 December 2005 22:51 (twenty years ago)

lol @ oppressed christians exchanging coded messages at the mall.

Looking forward to next Christmas, when they shall be taken to the Colosseum and made to fight lions for the amusement of fucking secularists.

But big ups this year to rugby-playin', laid-gettin', Canadian Christian geniuses everywhere. Have you mentioned how rich you are yet?

rogermexico (rogermexico), Saturday, 24 December 2005 23:15 (twenty years ago)

yeah I can hardly believe how oppressed Christians are, there are barely any churches any more like here in the south I have to drive a whole two blocks just to see one with some sanctimonious cute slogan on the marquee, and to make matters worse none of the newscasters or newspapers or magazines ever talk about Christmas or Jesus, I'm real lucky I've even heard of him, it's like North America's this secular wasteland where people are afraid to share Jesus fucking Christ with me, I wish I could hear more about Jesus but it's like everybody's afraid to even say his name

Merry Christmas e'eybody

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Sunday, 25 December 2005 00:33 (twenty years ago)

oh yeah I am changing my name

Mr Straight Toxic (ghostface), Sunday, 25 December 2005 00:33 (twenty years ago)

The fundies are letting the love-thy-brother mask slip.

not to mention their never-really-all-that-well-hidden anti-semitism.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 25 December 2005 01:25 (twenty years ago)

An employee being required to follow company policy while on the job. Now there's a shocker! After work she could go out on the street and wish two hundred people Merry Christmas in thirty minutes if she wished to.

Yes. Christians are certainly oppressed in North America, Rom. They are brutally forced to say pleasant and happy things to customers, even if their secret desire is to be pleasant in another, slightly different way.

all i have to say is that your stupid 'quoting' ability is hypocrysy

So you say. But why? How did we distort your implicit message of good cheer, which absolutely included calling us all fucking retards and telling us about our presumed shortcomings? I'd really like to know more about this hypocrisy you found.

But, please, wait until later. Have a merry christmas first, then there will be time enough afterward for explanations.

Aimless (Aimless), Sunday, 25 December 2005 01:28 (twenty years ago)

Today's Zippy strip is especially pungent.

I do feel guilty for getting any perverse amusement out of it (Rock Hardy), Sunday, 25 December 2005 01:29 (twenty years ago)

yes aimless, ur right in your own way, and im right in my own way and all i really have to say to all this is merry christmas and happy new year and to 'rogermexico', i am happy that you have summerized my outward qualities but u should understand that if i did have these qualities or not, my message would be the same and that is we are just on earth for a lease, when when we are secular, we are being convinced that our stay on earth is forever....not fearing the day of being judged....the only goal in life is death really and death can be seen as the taking the next step to what? not santa and not happy holidays, its christ and thats why im making all these entries on this is site...thats to make sure this is not unsung.....i want people to knwo that someone out-there is thinking this way......

im sorry to all those who got offended by me saying 'fucking retards' i didnt know i was dealing with very sensitive people who are not able to see past that, but im sorry anyhow and like christ taught his people, i hope u can all forgive me for saying suck foul stuff.......but then again, i did explain that and because 'Aimless' QUOTED this, i must explain further :)

but my house is full of people and family who are all here to celebrate christmas and to celebrate what we have, each other in christ.

merry christmas and i await for 'yangs'

bytw, 'Aimless' why do ur comments coinside with your such a name 'Aimless'?

rgc, Sunday, 25 December 2005 02:09 (twenty years ago)

for the record 'rogermexico' i am rich in soul but due to many student loans, i wont be out of the hole for a while, so no, i cant claim to being rich materialistically

rgc, Sunday, 25 December 2005 02:25 (twenty years ago)

when we are secular, we are being convinced that our stay on earth is forever....

eh?!?

Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 25 December 2005 02:32 (twenty years ago)

rgc's posts read like a REALLY bad ali g skit!

Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 25 December 2005 02:32 (twenty years ago)

OK, so i just read these claims and yes they are all funny, looking up and down the list, i cannot imagine how i would summerize my thoughts, but what i have to say that this 'rgc' guy is actually pure genius, yes he did say some dumb ass comments and yes most of you are pretty talented in pointing them out, but what really matters is what hes arguing and that is what really matters.

I myself dont care, but atleast someone on this site knows what he is talking about

bytw, who is ali g? and what is mensa, sounds interesting

carl

two-sevens!, Sunday, 25 December 2005 02:50 (twenty years ago)

thanks carl, god bless u

mensa.org will explain to you what exactly mensa is

and i too dont know who ali g is, im glad i sound like him, must be a cool guy.....lol

-rom

rgc, Sunday, 25 December 2005 02:52 (twenty years ago)

oh bloody hell marissa cloned herself again

kingfish holiday travesty (kingfish 2.0), Sunday, 25 December 2005 03:34 (twenty years ago)

just think, guys: maybe if we work through all this oppression, someday a christian can become PRESIDENT

happy new year, everybody!

maura (maura), Sunday, 25 December 2005 04:32 (twenty years ago)

Re: Calvin's mention upthread, I don't think the Constituion reflects Calvin's approach to the relationship between church and state. He did have Michael Servetus burned at the stake, after all. But beyond that, I don't think Calvin's Geneva served the founding fathers as a positive model.

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Sunday, 25 December 2005 18:49 (twenty years ago)

Hey everybody, that was fun. See you next year!

rogermexico (rogermexico), Monday, 26 December 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)

nyways, i dont know if im writing too much, im getting tired and im cooled and i think that by the time i check this site again, i will get responses from all walks of beliefs and ideas.....but its not gonna change my christ

it's not gonna change my christ!!!! Delightful :D

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Monday, 26 December 2005 19:32 (twenty years ago)

THAT'S MY JESUS!

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 26 December 2005 19:42 (twenty years ago)

http://www.hometown.aol.co.uk/cjap1980/images/jesus%20is%20my%20homeboy.jpg

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Monday, 26 December 2005 19:43 (twenty years ago)

http://quinnell.us/entertainment/movies/kevinsmith/dogma/images/buddychrist.jpg

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Monday, 26 December 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.