POLL: How many sex partners have you had?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

The definition of a "sex partner" is up to you. If you think that (for example) oral sex or handjobs count, then they do.

Poll Results

OptionVotes
1-3 34
11-15 17
4-6 15
7-10 14
21-30 12
16-20 9
31-50 5
0 5
51-70 4
71-100 3
Over 1002


Outlogged, Friday, 25 May 2007 09:48 (nineteen years ago)

There should be an option for "can't remember". Though I guess I can give an estimate.

Tuomas, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:00 (nineteen years ago)

If you can't remember it doesn't count.

The Wayward Johnny B, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:08 (nineteen years ago)

People are logging out now just to start a poll? Sheesh, logging out isn't what it just to be...

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:11 (nineteen years ago)

Sex panthers?

Ned Trifle II, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:11 (nineteen years ago)

if you can remember you weren't there

blueski, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:12 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.primotees.com/men/catalogimages/sex_panther.jpg

The Wayward Johnny B, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:12 (nineteen years ago)

Only five. Amazing really, as I'm nearly 40.

moley, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:13 (nineteen years ago)

"Made with real bits of Panther so you know it's good"

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:14 (nineteen years ago)

I see no "mind your own flipping business" option.

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:31 (nineteen years ago)

If you can't remember it doesn't count.

Er, I can remember having sex, but I can't remember the exact amount of partners. I guess if I'd sit down for awhile to think and count them all on a piece of paper, I could come up with an exact number, but I can't be arsed. I'm quite sure it's between 16 and 20, so I'll click on that.

Tuomas, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:38 (nineteen years ago)

so gangsta...

stevie, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:41 (nineteen years ago)

'sex partner' is not funny enough. SEXCOMPLICE.

blueski, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:44 (nineteen years ago)

Well, if I'd dated them all I'm sure I'd remember them easily, but come on, does every one-night stand leave a burning mark in your memory?

(x-post)

Tuomas, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:44 (nineteen years ago)

tuomas cant remember what a window is so its not surprising he cant remember anything else

696, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:45 (nineteen years ago)

^fake geezer's kiosk

Ed, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:48 (nineteen years ago)

If a one-night-stand leaves anything burning, you should be worried. And see a doctor.

C J, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:50 (nineteen years ago)

shut up tuomas, just click on a radio button and shut up.

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:53 (nineteen years ago)

dirty talk

blueski, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:55 (nineteen years ago)

Real gangsta-ass niggas dont flex nuts
Cuz real gangsta-ass niggas know they got em

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:55 (nineteen years ago)

Well, if I'd dated them all I'm sure I'd remember them easily, but come on, does every one-night stand leave a burning mark in your memory?

Maybe it did for the ladies. All recovered from sex.

nathalie, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:08 (nineteen years ago)

there should be a m vs. f version of this thread

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:16 (nineteen years ago)

there should be a creep vs non-creep version of this thread

696, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:18 (nineteen years ago)

There shouldn't be this thread.

Mark C, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:19 (nineteen years ago)

ok, agreed

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:19 (nineteen years ago)

If you think that (for example) oral sex or handjobs count, then they do.

What if your cat was watching you masturbating?

nathalie, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:22 (nineteen years ago)

haha

THE CAT DOES NOT CARE

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:25 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.androidtech.com/breadkrumbs/robyns-laughing-cat-photo.jpg

You think?

nathalie, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:26 (nineteen years ago)

So sex with someone unconscious doesn't count either?

Mark C, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:27 (nineteen years ago)

xpost You will never see a creature so indifferent to human sex. or anything else, really.

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:28 (nineteen years ago)

Ok, serious question, how the fuck did you make up these numbers? 51-70?!?

nathalie, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:30 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think he made those numbers up.

Matt DC, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:31 (nineteen years ago)

xxxpost Dogs will get all like, "What's wrong with my owner? He's making noise, I better check it out," or else they will be like, "Something sounds like fun, I better jump on the bed right now!"

Cats are like like, "I was comfortable here. Why are you moving your legs? Stop that."

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:31 (nineteen years ago)

but this has been covered in another thread

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:32 (nineteen years ago)

Kenan, you know too much about this. ;-)

nathalie, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:33 (nineteen years ago)

i have pets and i have sex. what?!???

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:34 (nineteen years ago)

Ok, TMI then. :-)

nathalie, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:35 (nineteen years ago)

51-70?!?

srsly, in that range, who could remember? I think "Over 30" would be a good point to cut it off and leave it to infinity.

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:36 (nineteen years ago)

has anyone around here slept with 50 people? Because we may have to establish an I Love Fucking board.

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:38 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.4thegame.com/media/00/03/47/ronaldo_cristiano_mufc_profile_2006.jpg

how many stepover have you had?

696, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:38 (nineteen years ago)

Kenan, we want to know who's Michael Douglas and who's Tuomas: the difference between a sex perv and a forgetful Finish student with too much pubic hair on his hands.

nathalie, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:38 (nineteen years ago)

xxpost Or an I Am Weird and Sad board.

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:39 (nineteen years ago)

Or "I am Finish and like to fuck in Bushes"

nathalie, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:40 (nineteen years ago)

(please interpret bushes any way you want to)

nathalie, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:41 (nineteen years ago)

I honestly doubt that even Michael Douglas has slept with 71-100 people. Warren Beatty, maybe.

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:42 (nineteen years ago)

I am Finish = it's all over now

C J, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:43 (nineteen years ago)

Kenan, I am sad to report I know this: Michael is a recovered sex addict.

nathalie, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:45 (nineteen years ago)

(He'd probably have to pick "gazillion")

nathalie, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:45 (nineteen years ago)

i did not know that. i learned something today.

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:52 (nineteen years ago)

It must be rotten to be a recovered sex addict, yet be married to someone as beautiful as Catherine Zeta Jones.

C J, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:53 (nineteen years ago)

CZJ must be pretty amazing.

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:54 (nineteen years ago)

um, 71-100 isnt much if you are famous! in fact its pitiful. a famous person should be batting 4 figures

696, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:59 (nineteen years ago)

so nasty.

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 11:59 (nineteen years ago)

at the same time

blueski, Friday, 25 May 2007 12:00 (nineteen years ago)

one pussy is a fine and good thing. 1000 pussies is a disturbing snatch leak.

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 12:07 (nineteen years ago)

DSL

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 12:09 (nineteen years ago)

Go on, Kenan, BLAME THE WOMEN ;-).

Any man who has 1000 partners is an odds-on fave to pick up a nice case of DISTRESSING SCROTAL LESIONS.

suzy, Friday, 25 May 2007 12:17 (nineteen years ago)

...or share it out!

suzy, Friday, 25 May 2007 12:18 (nineteen years ago)

Not to stereotype, but I'm guessing the gay friends of ILX are going to skew these results.

If you can't remember it doesn't count.

Balls.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 25 May 2007 13:26 (nineteen years ago)

im in the chaste camp.

cant believe i voted on this poll

homosexual II, Friday, 25 May 2007 13:31 (nineteen years ago)

well, there's always a couple in every gaggle of gayz.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 25 May 2007 13:33 (nineteen years ago)

Only 40. Amazing really as I'm 5.

ken c, Friday, 25 May 2007 13:34 (nineteen years ago)

Er, I can remember having sex, but I can't remember the exact amount of partners. I guess if I'd sit down for awhile to think and count them all on a piece of paper, I could come up with an exact number, but I can't be arsed. I'm quite sure it's between 16 and 20, so I'll click on that.

ok srsly if you can't remember between 16-20 ppl, you need to stop doing so many rave drugs or something, dude. i'm in a, uh, more advanced range and i can recall ppl with very little difficulty!!

you were just trying to show off, weren't you?

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 25 May 2007 13:59 (nineteen years ago)

I stopped at 40, so it was easy to remember

ken c, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:03 (nineteen years ago)

i also add a mark to the counter on the shaft of my cock each time i bone a new chick just in case i lose count

ken c, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:05 (nineteen years ago)

well that must look appalling.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 25 May 2007 14:05 (nineteen years ago)

Hang on, I have always imagined you as a ken doll, unburdened with nothing but smooth plastic.

Ed, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:05 (nineteen years ago)

xpost

Ed, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:06 (nineteen years ago)

you've been imagining my crotch

ken c, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:07 (nineteen years ago)

This thread needs Martin, is he still on ilx?

nickalicious, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:10 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.homeandgardener.co.uk/images/products/product_52.jpg

C J, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:12 (nineteen years ago)

it comes out to the depths, the dark places, a searing scar across the mind

Ed, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:18 (nineteen years ago)

this thread has Potential.

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:20 (nineteen years ago)

A-rushin', a-rushin' around

aldo, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:27 (nineteen years ago)

impotential more like xpost

ken c, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:32 (nineteen years ago)

you were just trying to show off, weren't you?

but he didn't have the balls to admit it like you. wink wink nudge nudge

nathalie, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:38 (nineteen years ago)

HAHAHAHAHA not really, i just figured everyone already knew that since there was a huge fucking thread about it!! which is i think deleted now? otherwise we could just revive that one instead of having a poll ;_;

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 25 May 2007 14:43 (nineteen years ago)

polls are fun. Like threads. But with voting.

Ms Misery, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:57 (nineteen years ago)

the original thread of this is where ally accuses me of being a louis jagger type stalker virgin

and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:45 (nineteen years ago)

its kind of like manalishi's 'you just wish you were in a gangbang' zing 6 years ahead of its time

and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:46 (nineteen years ago)

1-3, which isn't too bad, considering

(i) i've been in two long term relationships since i was 18, with only about 4 months single in 8 years

and

(ii) my personality, looks and charm

darraghmac, Friday, 25 May 2007 16:43 (nineteen years ago)

i can't remember that thread at all. i remember "i'm gonna wash your bike" contest thread... i think. or maybe i'm just making this up, wishful thinking style.

four months single? christ... i'm happy i had long periods of being in the desert. ;-)

stevienixed, Friday, 25 May 2007 16:52 (nineteen years ago)

ethan, the fact that you clearly remember some random "stop being such a virgin" comment i made to you six years ago in a thread with 17,000,000,000 posts doesn't help your case?

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 25 May 2007 16:54 (nineteen years ago)

xpost- i don't function well as a single person.

think jack lemmon in the odd couple kinda thing. or maybe walther matthau.

darraghmac, Friday, 25 May 2007 16:58 (nineteen years ago)

jack lemmon moved in with two women at the end of that movie. Are you saying you're that kinda playa?

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 17:03 (nineteen years ago)

I'm quite sure it's between 16 and 20, so I'll click on that.

Having a baby in the room when you wank does not constitute a sex partner.

onimo, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:05 (nineteen years ago)

It must be rotten to be a recovered sex addict, yet be married to someone as beautiful as Catherine Zeta Jones.

THe line obv worked on her, otherwise he wouldn't be married to her. Also, apparently they are having marital problems. She only recently realized that the line was a pick-up line lie.

stevienixed, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

sex addicts are fantastic if they are only having sex with you. otherwise, very dud.

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:19 (nineteen years ago)

Uh, no.

stevienixed, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:21 (nineteen years ago)

I think.

stevienixed, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:21 (nineteen years ago)

Especially if he looks anything like Michael Douglas.

stevienixed, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:22 (nineteen years ago)

having sex w/sex addict is NOT FUN

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:23 (nineteen years ago)

searching "sex" on this board is kind of terrifying

strongohulkington, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:25 (nineteen years ago)

WELCOME!

-- conner Smedley (gsc660), Sunday, February 16, 2003

strongohulkington, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:25 (nineteen years ago)

my only question wd be where actually to draw the line as 'sex' b/c there are definitely shy teenaged hookups that stopped short of what i think is sex, but are definitely in the neighborhood of sexual activity.

remy bean, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:39 (nineteen years ago)

The definition of a "sex partner" is up to you. If you think that (for example) oral sex or handjobs count, then they do.

max, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:39 (nineteen years ago)

mah hump mah hump mah hump

remy bean, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:44 (nineteen years ago)

better to have a slightly stricter definition, otherwise every stupid drunk blowjob counts as sex, and really we all know it doesn't.

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:47 (nineteen years ago)

I will have to recalculate, tho, given that.

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:48 (nineteen years ago)

Blowjobs are only sex if you're blowing someone you LOVE.

kenan, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:49 (nineteen years ago)

it was more the stalker part than the virgin part

and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:51 (nineteen years ago)

searching "sex" on this board is kind of terrifying

-- strongohulkington, Friday, May 25, 2007 7:25 PM (Friday, May 25, 2007 7:25 PM)

Just brings up a thousand Tuomas threads I'm guessing...

kv_nol, Friday, 25 May 2007 19:20 (nineteen years ago)

I Love Everything sodomy : Classic or dud

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Everything sex again.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Everything Best 80s Teen Sex Comedies!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Everything Sex and the City — Classic or Dud

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Everything the ned suggested oral sex thread

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Everything Taking sides: Pasta Sex vs. Burger Sex

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Everything I hate sex.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Everything Opposite Sex

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Everything What do you most admire about the opposite sex?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Everything What do you love about the same sex

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Everything Hair or Sex?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Everything Trig Brother Question 11: Which Celebrity Of The Opposite Sex Would Play You In A Film?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Everything Text message sex

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Everything Sex Tourism: C or D?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Everything Better than sex!

HI DERE, Friday, 25 May 2007 19:21 (nineteen years ago)

And that's just how Dan organises his hard drive...

kv_nol, Friday, 25 May 2007 19:22 (nineteen years ago)

I don't see why people are making such a number out of this. Okay, I can't remember everyone I've had sex with, big deal. It's not like I want to brag, as someone pointed out, some people have slept with many more people, and it's not a big deal. I have a female friend who's three years younger than me who's had sex with more than 80 people, and I don't think there's anything wrong with that. It's just something people do with each other.

(P.S. I'm also drunk.)

Tuomas, Saturday, 26 May 2007 00:49 (nineteen years ago)

Tuomas, it's only because it's you asking. Don't worry man, people have a good time, it can be beautiful, otherwise it can be functional. Peace be with you dude.

kv_nol, Saturday, 26 May 2007 01:07 (nineteen years ago)

I have a female friend who's three years younger than me who's had sex with more than 80 people

PS she's a slut

kenan, Saturday, 26 May 2007 01:21 (nineteen years ago)

Fuck you.

Tuomas, Saturday, 26 May 2007 11:11 (nineteen years ago)

Wait a second, is she hot?

Matt DC, Saturday, 26 May 2007 11:14 (nineteen years ago)

Kenan, you're in! (xpost)

kv_nol, Saturday, 26 May 2007 11:36 (nineteen years ago)

it's Finland guys.

blueski, Saturday, 26 May 2007 11:41 (nineteen years ago)

"What else is there to do in Finland, but rent comics from the library and fuck."

nathalie, Saturday, 26 May 2007 11:41 (nineteen years ago)

*emigrates*

*to Canada*

Mister Craig, Saturday, 26 May 2007 13:03 (nineteen years ago)

I voted and then I cried.

Dimension 5ive, Saturday, 26 May 2007 14:49 (nineteen years ago)

It could be worse, you could've been weeping from your genitals.

Mister Craig, Saturday, 26 May 2007 18:32 (nineteen years ago)

Bump.

Outlogged, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:05 (nineteen years ago)

woah

blueski, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:10 (nineteen years ago)

wtf ilx

ghost rider, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:13 (nineteen years ago)

WHORES

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:14 (nineteen years ago)

holy shit

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:14 (nineteen years ago)

(@ the virgins, obv)

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:15 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, a lot of you are lying out your (loose, poxied, syphilitic) asses.

remy bean, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:17 (nineteen years ago)

to be fair I did exaggerate by about 7000%

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:17 (nineteen years ago)

I guess this isn't a surprising result, though I would've expected 4-6 to be at the top. And assuming everyone was honest (yeah right), I think the ILX average is above UK/USA average. So maybe ILXors are sexually more liberal than average people?

Tuomas, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:18 (nineteen years ago)

The largest group was 1-3. . . what exactly are you people acting shocked by?

Ms Misery, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:18 (nineteen years ago)

I have a female friend who's three years younger than me who's had sex with more than 80 people

PS she's a slut

-- kenan, Saturday, May 26, 2007 1:21 AM (3 days ago) Bookmark Link

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fuck you.

-- Tuomas, Saturday, May 26, 2007 11:11 AM (3 days ago) Bookmark Link

lololol

Jordan, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:20 (nineteen years ago)

Wait - that can't be right! For the most part those numbers are a lot lower than I'd have expected.

ENBB, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:21 (nineteen years ago)

that the average number of sexual parters of people who'd self-respond to an internet poll is 11.

remy bean, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:22 (nineteen years ago)

well, obv. your number wasn't the average. ;)

Ms Misery, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:22 (nineteen years ago)

ENBB is a tramp ;-)

ghost rider, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:24 (nineteen years ago)

no, it certainly isn't! i just find it hard to believe that half of the people on here have had sexual encounters with >16 partners.

remy bean, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:24 (nineteen years ago)

>16 >0

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:24 (nineteen years ago)

xpost
Some of us get around.

Ms Misery, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:25 (nineteen years ago)

ok a good number of the >20 answers are prob lies/joeks, it's the fact that plurality of ilxors are apparently louis that is surprising me. 1-3 is not a funny joek answer.

ghost rider, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:26 (nineteen years ago)

If having had sex with more than 3 people in the 13 years since I first had it makes me tramp then I guess I'm guilty as charged. Oh well. ;-)

ENBB, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:31 (nineteen years ago)

Can count them all on one hand.

Abbott, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:32 (nineteen years ago)

the number of virgins seems low

deej, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:32 (nineteen years ago)

that's cause they usually get thrown in a volcano

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:33 (nineteen years ago)

POLL: How many Ilxors have you had?

kenan, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:33 (nineteen years ago)

ok a good number of the >20 answers are prob lies/joeks

why do you think this? I was actually surprised there weren't more answers in that range. I mean if you're going to lie, shoot for the 50-100 range. Or better yet go Wilt Chamberlein/Gene Simmons.

Ms Misery, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:34 (nineteen years ago)

xpost This could be what's skewing the numbers. We can't keep our hands off each other.

kenan, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:34 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think I saw this poll when it was started.

As far as heterosexual intercourse goes, it's 3 for me. But there's probably a good 7 or 8 others that I'd consider sex partners in terms of more than just making out or feeling up.

jaymc, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:35 (nineteen years ago)

are you counting frottage?

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:36 (nineteen years ago)

nevermind, everyone, just nevermind

ghost rider, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:36 (nineteen years ago)

If you don't count the two 100+ answers, the rough average amount of sex partners is 14 I think.

Outlogged, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:37 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe someone with better math skills could recheck that though?

Outlogged, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:38 (nineteen years ago)

how the hell are you people even fucking averaging age ranges for god's sake?

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:38 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, i ran some rough numbers as well, and it's about 15-16 even with the two comedy answers.

kenan, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:39 (nineteen years ago)

age=number, i'm too stunned by this faux science to even type straight

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:39 (nineteen years ago)

ally: take the median of each range

kenan, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:39 (nineteen years ago)

that is absolutely terrible mathematics, especially considering the ranges aren't consistent sizes?

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:39 (nineteen years ago)

there's no good way to do it, really

kenan, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:40 (nineteen years ago)

well then why are you idiots bothering??

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:41 (nineteen years ago)

i voted BOXCAR

ghost rider, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:41 (nineteen years ago)

"11-15" got as many votes as George W. Bush.

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:41 (nineteen years ago)

no matter what magical number you guys decide to pick out of your FOUR POSSIBLE AVERAGES SO FAR to be the average, it's still going to stun remy!!!

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:41 (nineteen years ago)

So what did George W. Bush vote?

Mark G, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:43 (nineteen years ago)

I hope these numbers aren't depressing to anyone. Quality before quantity, right?

Tuomas, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:44 (nineteen years ago)

Can we get a distribution graph?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:44 (nineteen years ago)

it's just a fucking approximation

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:45 (nineteen years ago)

shut up xpost

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:45 (nineteen years ago)

ok a good number of the >20 answers are prob lies/joeks

I don't think this is that hard to umm, "accomplish." For instance, I know a guy who just recently got married (age 32). He's been sexually active since he was 15/16 and could be considered somewhat of a player (though to his credit, he's not so much devious as tall & good-looking and has lots of pretty forward offers from the opposite sex) I would have no problem believing he's averaged 4 or 5 different sexual partners a year for the last 15+ years. so 15 x 5, etc.

will, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:46 (nineteen years ago)

it is a little odd that the range isn't distributed, it jumps up categories and then down again (note i have 0 stats training so my language is probably way off here)

gff, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:47 (nineteen years ago)

I should note that he isn't famous for being terribly discriminating.

xpost

will, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:49 (nineteen years ago)

i didn't vote b/c there was no A BILLION

rrrobyn, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:51 (nineteen years ago)

there should have just been an option for "more than you, n00b."

kenan, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:52 (nineteen years ago)

WHO HAS HAD THE SASSIEST SEX PARTNERS, THAT IS THE QUESTION

ghost rider, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:52 (nineteen years ago)

and b/c this is teh first time i've read this scientific thread
xpost

rrrobyn, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:52 (nineteen years ago)

SASSY

rrrobyn, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:53 (nineteen years ago)

.jpg

rrrobyn, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:53 (nineteen years ago)

You underestimate us; we settle for nothing less.

kenan, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:53 (nineteen years ago)

I think for most folks it's mainly a question of what's you're attitude towards sexuality. Some people only have sex in a steady relationship and have high standards for their sex partners, whereas for other folks it can be a fun pastime, and the standards aren't that high either. I see nothing wrong in either attitude.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:54 (nineteen years ago)

ally, i'm just a scared little boy in a sea of internet hornbags.

remy bean, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:54 (nineteen years ago)

Though of course it's a different question if you're, say, exteremely shy or insecure.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:55 (nineteen years ago)

You underestimate us; we settle for nothing less.

-- kenan, Tuesday, May 29, 2007 3:53 PM (31 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

I think for most folks it's mainly a question of what's you're attitude towards sexuality. Some people only have sex in a steady relationship and have high standards for their sex partners, whereas for other folks it can be a fun pastime, and the standards aren't that high either. I see nothing wrong in either attitude.

-- Tuomas, Tuesday, May 29, 2007 3:54 PM (14 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

You underestimate us; we settle for nothing less.

-- kenan, Tuesday, May 29, 2007 3:53 PM (31 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

I think for most folks it's mainly a question of what's you're attitude towards sexuality. Some people only have sex in a steady relationship and have high standards for their sex partners, whereas for other folks it can be a fun pastime, and the standards aren't that high either. I see nothing wrong in either attitude.

-- Tuomas, Tuesday, May 29, 2007 3:54 PM (14 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

You underestimate us; we settle for nothing less.

-- kenan, Tuesday, May 29, 2007 3:53 PM (31 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

I think for most folks it's mainly a question of what's you're attitude towards sexuality. Some people only have sex in a steady relationship and have high standards for their sex partners, whereas for other folks it can be a fun pastime, and the standards aren't that high either. I see nothing wrong in either attitude.

-- Tuomas, Tuesday, May 29, 2007 3:54 PM (14 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

You underestimate us; we settle for nothing less.

-- kenan, Tuesday, May 29, 2007 3:53 PM (31 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

I think for most folks it's mainly a question of what's you're attitude towards sexuality. Some people only have sex in a steady relationship and have high standards for their sex partners, whereas for other folks it can be a fun pastime, and the standards aren't that high either. I see nothing wrong in either attitude.

-- Tuomas, Tuesday, May 29, 2007 3:54 PM (14 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:55 (nineteen years ago)

POLL: Favo(u)rite US state to have sex partners in

ghost rider, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:55 (nineteen years ago)

I'm sorry - I'm new here but I already have a problem with the three people who voted '71-100.' Couldn't you have had sex with just a few more people before the poll closed to get to the top rung? Don't you care about being the best? YOU ARE SLACKERS. You should have called. I would have had sex with you myself. Slackers.

humansuit, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:56 (nineteen years ago)

that is an interesting mobius strip you've made pp

rrrobyn, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:57 (nineteen years ago)

ok a good number of the >20 answers are prob lies/joeks

ok if someone sleeps with say 3 people a year, theyre going to be hitting 20 by the time their 23 or 24 so >20 is hardly unreasonable

696, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:00 (nineteen years ago)

PP, you've made Dr. Morbius strip? That is interesting.

jaymc, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:01 (nineteen years ago)

i know, i was hedging my bets, i didn't even mean "most"

ghost rider, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:01 (nineteen years ago)

ok a good number of the >20 answers are prob lies/joeks

this says more about you than us.

stevienixed, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:03 (nineteen years ago)

what i meant to say was "LOL 100+ GOOD ONE TUOMAS BUT SRSLY LOTS OF ILXORS BE OLD, ARE YOU ALL SHUT-INS, DID NONE OF YOU GO TO LOL COLLEGE?"

ghost rider, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:04 (nineteen years ago)

SETVEIE NIXED OTM I AM SHOCKED AT HOW MUCH SEX YOU ARE ALL HAVING ALL OF THE TIME MY MONOCLE HAS SHATTERRED

ghost rider, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:05 (nineteen years ago)

Blogger be a virgin.

Ed, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:05 (nineteen years ago)

hahaha shattered monocle

rrrobyn, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:07 (nineteen years ago)

that's why i blog on and off: i jump on and off the lapsed virgin wagon way too much.

stevienixed, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:07 (nineteen years ago)

people always find the 'shocking' threshold a couple of categories above wherever they are

i think i would like to move up a category by end of year (should do) or maybe two (wildly ambitious!)

696, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:09 (nineteen years ago)

So going for the masturbation marathon session this summer?

stevienixed, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:09 (nineteen years ago)

I hope I have found my category for life. I couldn't keep up with myself otherwise.

Ms Misery, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:10 (nineteen years ago)

Going down a few categories is hard. Well, actually, no, it isn't. You just fall down on your knees.

stevienixed, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:10 (nineteen years ago)

it doesn't count if it's consensual

remy bean, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:23 (nineteen years ago)

i just recounted and need to change my answer

forksclovetofu, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 22:16 (nineteen years ago)

y'all boheezies know that >100 in binary notation just means more than four rite

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 22:18 (nineteen years ago)

how does your nasty slutty arithmetic feel about itself NOW

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 22:18 (nineteen years ago)

i'm surprised by the results here, but maybe in part because i figured people would be using expansive definitions to move the numbers up? or were the higher-numbered people (like the higher-salaried people? the non-children-of-divorce?) less likely to vote?

gabbneb, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 22:20 (nineteen years ago)

i thought the mode would be 7-10, not 1-3 - really surprised by the margin of 'victory'.

FAFLP? "no, me neither"

blueski, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 22:53 (nineteen years ago)

y'all boheezies know that >100 in binary notation just means more than four rite

It's in Hex, fool.

Ed, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 07:44 (nineteen years ago)

hmm, i'm not worried about being in the majority, just intrigues by the fact that only about 4 others out of 34 admitted it....

darraghmac, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 11:04 (nineteen years ago)

wait a minute, is this the 'rule of three' a la american pie in action?

darraghmac, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 11:04 (nineteen years ago)

YES I AM IN THE TOP GROUP>
DEAL WITH IT SUCKAZ>

Dimension 5ive, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 11:37 (nineteen years ago)

ok if someone sleeps with say 3 people a year, theyre going to be hitting 20 by the time their 23 or 24 so >20 is hardly unreasonable

haha wait, not if they are any number of ppl on ilx who have openly admitted to not having sex until 20 or 21 or so???

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 30 May 2007 14:13 (nineteen years ago)

They might be making up for lost time.

Ms Misery, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 14:22 (nineteen years ago)

Twenty-two, thank you very much.

Laurel, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 14:22 (nineteen years ago)

ok they aren't "making up for lost time" if they are sleeping with 3 people a year

am i the only person reading these posts?

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 30 May 2007 14:39 (nineteen years ago)

2, both within past month and a half, plenty more lost time to be made up, mind!

Just got offed, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:01 (nineteen years ago)

props 2 all ILX hos

blueski, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:03 (nineteen years ago)

"Twenty-two" was a response to "...ppl on ilx who have openly admitted to not having sex until 20 or 21 or so???", by the way, not the thread Q.

Laurel, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:04 (nineteen years ago)

only standard regular props 2 u then.

blueski, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:04 (nineteen years ago)

Haha, I was thinking that was very forward of you.

remy bean, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:05 (nineteen years ago)

Although I will see your props and raise you a bag of dicks.

Oh, xp.

Laurel, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:05 (nineteen years ago)

laurel! I was about say... Shocked! 22!

kenan, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:07 (nineteen years ago)

ok not rlly.

kenan, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:08 (nineteen years ago)

I feel you might be able to create another poll here.

Ed, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:08 (nineteen years ago)

2, both within past month and a half, plenty more lost time to be made up, mind!

-- Just got offed, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:01 (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

http://www.2-funky.co.uk/images/covers/34604-large.jpg

Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:09 (nineteen years ago)

maybe he can hook u up dude

blueski, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:09 (nineteen years ago)

dom grows on me by the day

Just got offed, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:10 (nineteen years ago)

fungi to be with

blueski, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:11 (nineteen years ago)

stevem i am now thinking of ringworm and it is your fault :(

Just got offed, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:14 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/01/Picture_4.png

Is this graph for real? Have so many people had so few sex partners? I've had about 11, but I've been single for like ... 5 years, and most of those experiences were less than fun; it all pales in comparison to relationship sex. I always thought my number would be considered low.

burt_stanton, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 20:59 (seventeen years ago)

Maybe bcz people don't want to fuck any old jerkstore that comes along?

Abbott of the Trapezoid Monks (Abbott), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 22:06 (seventeen years ago)

(just a hypothesis)

Abbott of the Trapezoid Monks (Abbott), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 22:06 (seventeen years ago)

the number of virgins seems low

― deej, Wednesday, May 30, 2007 6:32 AM (1 year ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

dugong.jpg (jabba hands), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 23:29 (seventeen years ago)

I've had about 11, but I've been single for like ... 5 years, and most of those experiences were less than fun

dont beat yourself up about it dude, we all have our failings

R. L. Stinebeck (John Justen), Tuesday, 6 January 2009 23:53 (seventeen years ago)

it's not the amount of girls that counts - it's the amount of cunnilingus received by me that means anything

❤ⓛⓞⓥⓔ❤ (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 00:43 (seventeen years ago)

please tell us exactly how much cunnilingus you have received

Lemonade In Hammocks (electricsound), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 00:44 (seventeen years ago)

wtf

dugong.jpg (jabba hands), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 00:45 (seventeen years ago)

jesuswept.jpg

Calling All Creeps! (contenderizer), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 00:46 (seventeen years ago)

please do not tell us exactly how much cunnilingus you have received

R. L. Stinebeck (John Justen), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 00:48 (seventeen years ago)

not enough

Maria, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 00:50 (seventeen years ago)

it's not the amount of girls that counts - it's the amount of cunnilingus received by me that means anything

― ❤ⓛⓞⓥⓔ❤ (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 00:43 (13 minutes ago)

Lorax are you trans? Because if not then I believe the term you're looking for is fellatio.

Too Into Dancing to Argue (ENBB), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 00:58 (seventeen years ago)

omgggggggg

bigHOOS thundercat rapper (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 01:05 (seventeen years ago)

nono, lorax presides over a room, his room, and upon the rug, beneath his gimlet eye, are hosted acts of cunnilingus, between two parties other than himself

and he rings a little bell if it is good

I have "boned" two lesbians. Anything can happen. (country matters), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 01:09 (seventeen years ago)

i am currently giving captain lorax cunnilingus btw

bigHOOS thundercat rapper (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 01:09 (seventeen years ago)

^my least favorite meme in the history of ilx

jordan s (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 01:10 (seventeen years ago)

for the rest of your life Hoosteen, the rest of your life.

Too Into Dancing to Argue (ENBB), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 01:12 (seventeen years ago)

I still hope lorax understands the diff between la lingus and fellatio.

Too Into Dancing to Argue (ENBB), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 01:12 (seventeen years ago)

Lorax is about to finally understand 1000 dirty jokes of the past, all at once.

"80s Baby" (Z S), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 01:19 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.johnnyjet.com/images/PicForNewsletterIrelandSept2005AerLingusPlane.JPG

Pain don't hurt. (Pillbox), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 01:55 (seventeen years ago)

Maybe Lorax is a lesbian? Women can be captains too, you know?

Tuomas, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 07:36 (seventeen years ago)

Maybe in another 100 years, having toppled the patriarchy and built in its place an egalitarian utopia of sexuality liberated from shame and gender roles freed from petty labels and hurtful stereotypes, our great-grandchildren will let loose a collective sigh of gratitude from every nation of the earth as they get ready to sink their teeth into the fullest and juiciest fruit of their labor: the first Woman Tuomas.

Your not a lesbian, you are in puppy love. Go and have some fun! (unregistered), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 08:41 (seventeen years ago)

I was just encouraging a stupid meme - yes I know the difference

❤ⓛⓞⓥⓔ❤ (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 08:46 (seventeen years ago)

whatever you say lorax

Lemonade In Hammocks (electricsound), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 08:48 (seventeen years ago)

I always assumed Captain Lorax was a girl anyway tbh.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 10:18 (seventeen years ago)

>I've had about 11, but I've been single for like ... 5 years, and most of those experiences were less than fun

WOW...some straight guys really live like this. sorry silly generalization

Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 11:39 (seventeen years ago)

Maybe Lorax is a lesbian? Women can be captains too, you know?

― Tuomas, Wednesday, January 7, 2009 2:36 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark

Lorax has posted pics before Tuomas - def not a woman.

Too Into Dancing to Argue (ENBB), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 14:42 (seventeen years ago)

i read that 'before' in a 'in the presence of' context

Timezilla vs Mechadistance (blueski), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 14:52 (seventeen years ago)

Lorax lusting after lesbians doth not make Lorax a lesbian.

xhuxk e. xheese (jaymc), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 15:01 (seventeen years ago)

please do not tell us exactly how much cunnilingus you have received

― R. L. Stinebeck (John Justen), Tuesday, January 6, 2009 6:48 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

not enough

― Maria, Tuesday, January 6, 2009 6:50 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

I still can't tell whether Maria is responding to the post above hers or to the thread title.

xhuxk e. xheese (jaymc), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 15:06 (seventeen years ago)

http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/01/Picture_4.png

what's the meaning of this graph?

o_O (ken c), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 17:59 (seventeen years ago)

oh i see now

o_O (ken c), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 18:00 (seventeen years ago)

strange use of bar charts to show percentages.

o_O (ken c), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 18:01 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i still can't actually figure it out

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 18:01 (seventeen years ago)

height of bar = % of respondents
it's broken out between 2-4 partners and 5 or more

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 18:03 (seventeen years ago)

So, for example, out of 100% of the non-drinkers, 5% said they had 2-4 multiple partners (I assume simultaneously?) and 2% said they had 5 or more, etc etc.

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 18:05 (seventeen years ago)

so there were more binge-drinking respondents than the rest put together?

55% of respondents have had 1 or 0 sexual partners?

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 18:07 (seventeen years ago)

POLL: IF YOU'VE DONE IT WITH MORE THAN ONE PERSON, CHANCES ARE YOU'RE A BINGE DRINKER

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 18:09 (seventeen years ago)

55% only sleep with 1 person at a time.

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 18:10 (seventeen years ago)

wait, it's AT THE SAME TIME??

i have wasted my life

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 18:13 (seventeen years ago)

OK found it.
http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/pr2009/pr001-09.shtml

apparently it's partners in the past year. makes more sense.

o_O (ken c), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 18:25 (seventeen years ago)

basically it's saying even if you binge drink, there's only 1 in 5 chance of you getting to shag more than one person a year. what a sad world!

o_O (ken c), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 18:27 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.