Or, how computer companies use (and further) the popular notion of the computer tech person as some kind of idiot savant to advertise their service.
What bothers me about this is the appeal to a knownothingism -- that recalls AOL's (erstwhile?) marketing practice of making computers seem big and scary and advertisting themselves as being the sort of product you can use if you don't know how to make toast.
There's also an element of ridiculousness in it--if the folks who work behind the counter at the Apple Store, or who hold down a job at Best Buy, are "geniuses," then what of the people who program the things to begin with? There's a debasing of the notion of genius or even specialized intelligence here.
And I'm bothered by this in yet another way that I just can't put my finger on. Is it the crudeness of the stereotyping? The way that the "product" is sold in such a way that seems to debase the people who provide it?
Thoughts?
― amateurist, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:15 (nineteen years ago)
Ever heard of a place called Hooters?
― Ms Misery, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:16 (nineteen years ago)
yes, what is the point you wish to make?
― amateurist, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:17 (nineteen years ago)
"Dan Brown has to be one of the best, smartest, and most accomplished writers in the country. THE DA VINCI CODE is many notches above the intelligent thriller; this is pure genius." -NELSON DeMILLE, #1 New York Times bestselling author
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:39 (nineteen years ago)
i'm less bothered by this than by the notion of trumping up through cutesy titles what is still probably underpaid, thankless customer service work.
― gff, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:43 (nineteen years ago)
I love that circuit city or wherever now has those "firedog" guys that are like one step below the geek squad bullshit, these dudes don't deal with computers even, they just hook up your home theater equipment for you. Like hiring people to come put your IKEA shit together, are modern consumers seriously this incapable of basic tasks? We can't even clean our own houses anymore, can we?
― TOMBOT, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:50 (nineteen years ago)
remember when it was just "i don't know how to program my VCR"
― latebloomer, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:52 (nineteen years ago)
when i worked at subway they wanted me to wear a gold pin that said SANDWICH ARTIST
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:53 (nineteen years ago)
I could program a VCR when I was like 2
― Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:53 (nineteen years ago)
did you, ethan?
no i worked unsupervised night shift so i spent most of my time talking on the phone or hooking my walkman up to the store radio
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:55 (nineteen years ago)
we were in the projects and only had about one dude walk up every 45 minutes or so, usually really drunk
also at least once a week somebody would ask if we served ribs
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:56 (nineteen years ago)
The way that the "product" is sold in such a way that seems to debase the people who provide it?
My point is this approach is not new. It's just a different target.
― Ms Misery, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:56 (nineteen years ago)
i do think in maybe the last 20 years or so theres been a shift towards awarding the 'genius' distinction for really simple, basic tasks instead of to, you know, actual geniuses
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:57 (nineteen years ago)
Sometimes I genuinely feel that my manliness is insulted by the simple knowledge that there are dudes out there who want to have powerful computers and big home surround sound theater bullshit and nice furniture yet are completely uninterested and incapable of assembling and maintaining their own equipment. Let's not even get started on cars nowadays. I suppose at one point before all electronics were transistorized a man could repair all his own household appliances right down to the teevee. And back in the day when you could actually fix your car without taking it in to the dealership for a computer-aided diagnosis. We're all becoming a bunch of emasculated chumps, aren't we? They won't let us do anything anymore, it's too complex, too miniaturized, too unreliable to begin with.
― TOMBOT, Friday, 25 May 2007 14:58 (nineteen years ago)
we can all learn a lesson in manliness from the Geek Squad
― Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:01 (nineteen years ago)
inasmuch as being a bunch of pompous, expendable dickheads in matching shirts, I guess
― TOMBOT, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:04 (nineteen years ago)
They're just schmoes doing a (not well-paid) job. Don't hate.
― Ms Misery, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:05 (nineteen years ago)
Obviously if people didn't really have that level of discomfort with computers, the marketing wouldn't be effective.
Don't forget it's partly aimed at people of the generation that did not grow up with a computer. My grandfather was a brilliant guy with a lot of technical know-how (he designed his own home, was always modifying his home hi-fi system, etc.), but WebTV beguiled him up to his death.
― Hurting 2, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:05 (nineteen years ago)
no actually they're fuckwits who regularly scam people. Just like a lot of "outsourced support staff" to include your stereotypical auto dealership greasemonkey.
http://consumerist.com/consumer/roundups/top-geek-squad-stories-to-date-257316.php
― TOMBOT, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:07 (nineteen years ago)
yeah, i don't think the geek squad is really a good example of just your average over-titled, under-paid customer service job like the "mac genius" or similar store stuff.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 25 May 2007 15:08 (nineteen years ago)
and I'm not hating so much as I am pulling the "takes one to know one" bit on being an overpaid doofus who only has a job because people basically follow the herd and don't like to read or learn
― TOMBOT, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:09 (nineteen years ago)
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,380,000 for "* is a genius". (0.14 seconds)
Sufjan Stephens is a genius! JOSS WHEDON IS A GENIUS J.K.Rowling is a genius Zach Braff is a genius. Banksy is a genius! David Sedaris is a GENIUS Trent Reznor is a genius. There is no other word for him. Ricky Gervais is a genius Seth MacFarlane is a genius. I can't wait for the new series and it would truely freakin sweet if they did a live show in the UK! Anyway, Quentin Taratino is a genius. Stephen Malkmus is a genius! Thom Yorke is a genius. Zach Braff is a genius. "Good luck exploring the infinite abyss!" "Hey, you too!"
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:10 (nineteen years ago)
Salespersons are the most underrated people EVAH. I want good service, but I can tolerate a lot of shit because I know that being in sales can be a shitty place to be in. (The other day we had a guy SCREAMING in our shop. He later came to apologize.)
― nathalie, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:11 (nineteen years ago)
Haha "there is no other word for him."
― Hurting 2, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:12 (nineteen years ago)
zach braff, twice? jesus.
― latebloomer, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:13 (nineteen years ago)
actually I shouldn't so much blame people for not knowing how to properly maintain things like Windows or OS X or fix their own cars anymore. It's really the industry's fault for taking advantage of the fact that if you make something complicated and proprietary there's a boatload of money to be made (by someone) fixing it for your customers when it inevitably breaks, two or three times a year if possible.
― TOMBOT, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:14 (nineteen years ago)
-- TOMBOT, Friday, May 25, 2007 3:07 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
look at the filename of the picture on that page
― s1ocki, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:15 (nineteen years ago)
I'm sure your job involves more than installing computers.
― Ms Misery, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:17 (nineteen years ago)
HI I UPDATED YOUR RAMS
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:25 (nineteen years ago)
What bothers me more than "Mac Genius" is the fact that someone thought about the term long enough to get upset. We need fewer people upset over trivialities and more people upset about the big shit.
― libcrypt, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:30 (nineteen years ago)
the big shit is overwhelming though.
― TOMBOT, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:30 (nineteen years ago)
I read that in New Scientist.
-- libcrypt, Friday, May 25, 2007 3:30 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
irony genius
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:33 (nineteen years ago)
Heh, that was the point!
― libcrypt, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:34 (nineteen years ago)
sorry i dont know who libcrypt is
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:35 (nineteen years ago)
He's in your computer.
― libcrypt, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:35 (nineteen years ago)
that bothers me more than "mac genius"
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:36 (nineteen years ago)
i would think the whole computer genius concept is on the way out though, the general pop is much more adept with computers and the internets then 10 years ago. isn't this partially why AOL died? I mean aside from the whole broadband thing.
/cue aol address
― bnw, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:43 (nineteen years ago)
also why you can talk about the internet in public now without nerd lolz
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:43 (nineteen years ago)
when i first started posting to ilx i would never ever ever ever credit something to a messageboard i read but now i dont know anyone, including my mom, who doesnt regularly
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:44 (nineteen years ago)
WoW is our Golf
― TOMBOT, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:46 (nineteen years ago)
FARK is the WSJ
"so what do you guys think about this whole internet thing?" is my favorite conversation lag breaker.
― bnw, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:46 (nineteen years ago)
I'm mostly glad I don't know anyone who frequents collegehumor
― TOMBOT, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:47 (nineteen years ago)
fark >>>>>> wsj
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:47 (nineteen years ago)
people still making "series of tubes" jokes is still C not D yet right
people = digg
― bnw, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:48 (nineteen years ago)
go fug yourself
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:48 (nineteen years ago)
tabloids = lolcats
― bnw, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:49 (nineteen years ago)
What bothers me more than "Mac Genius" is the fact that someone thought about the term long enough to get upset. We need fewer people upset over trivialities and more people upset about the big shit.-- libcrypt, Friday, May 25, 2007 3:30 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/62/Droste.jpg
― amateurist, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:51 (nineteen years ago)
i would buy weekly world lolcats in line at the grocery store
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:51 (nineteen years ago)
also yeah it bugs me as well that these guys are likely undertrained and underpaid and their employers still manage to make hay calling them "geniuses" and suchlike.
also in here somewhere is the pop-cultural reclamation of the terms "nerd" and "geek" as ambivalent superlatives, something that always bothered me.
the way the marketing for "geek squad" works, there's a sort of tacit "these guys are probably out back masturbating to anime porn and trading magic cards, but boy can they ever fix your hard drive!" quality. which is probably wrong, or at least hasty, on all counts.
― amateurist, Friday, 25 May 2007 15:55 (nineteen years ago)
yeah like why market simple reassurance, professionalism and expertise when you can market a stereotype from high school that "most folks" looked down upon? it's sort of the same thing that I started to hate about crispin porter bogusky's stuff, such a purposefully lowbrow attitude to everything as if that's either original or still a common set of values for people past their 3rd year of college
― TOMBOT, Friday, 25 May 2007 16:02 (nineteen years ago)
Doug: In episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scratchy's skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we to believe, that this is some sort of a magic xylophone or something? Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder.
June: Uh, well, uh...
Homer: I'll field that one. Let me ask you a question. Why would a man whose shirt says "Genius at Work" spend all of his time watching a children's cartoon show?
Doug: [embarrassed pause] I withdraw my question.
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 16:04 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.tmsfeatures.com/tmsfeatures/servlet/com.featureserv.util.Download?file=20070521csbgg-a-p.jpg&code=csbgg
― and what, Friday, 25 May 2007 16:48 (nineteen years ago)
Huh, weird: I never felt like either company was really pitching these people as classic geek geniuses, if only because the social skills associated with classic geek geniuses are not exactly ones you want to project for your customer service team. It's the new geek-light: pleasant young people who will whip your stuff into shape, and then you'll be all like "whew, thanks, awesome, you're a genius!" I dunno, maybe "wizard" was already trademarked, but "geek" stuff that used to be the province of maladjusted techies is now a lot more wide-open -- you can meet young guys now who are into electronics/computers the way they might once have been into, like, cars. Gaming probably helps on this one.
Anyway, yeah, it's a little weird that people go both ways on this stuff: they'll kind of act like their lack of high-level computing skill is a deficiency, but then act like other people's high-level computing skills are amazing. I think it's just confusing that the computer is one of few items used by nearly everyone that can also be used at WILDLY varying depths and levels of complexity; the level lots of people use it at is not actually deep enough to justify learning much about how the computer works or how to maintain it; and so there's no general cultural rule about how much of this stuff is "normal" to know. Which is maybe bad. Most people should feel normal treating their computers about like cars, and acknowledging that specialists should be dealing with it often -- but the big difference is that everyone knows how to use a car completely (it's not like you can be a "power user" in your Camry), which is just not true with computers.
― nabisco, Friday, 25 May 2007 16:48 (nineteen years ago)
I hate the Genius Bar.
― dan m, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:16 (nineteen years ago)
Come on nabisco, no black person in their right mind is going to invite The Wizard Squad into their home!
― HI DERE, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:20 (nineteen years ago)
"You're having a problem with your wifi? Let me set up a cross in your living room and set it on fire; that will solve the part of the problem where you live in our neighborhood."
― HI DERE, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:24 (nineteen years ago)
http://wizardishungry.com/blog/_/2007/05/ram.jpg
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 25 May 2007 18:31 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.macmall.com/ vs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_Mall
― am0n, Friday, 25 May 2007 19:14 (nineteen years ago)
threads like this are like rock songs that have "rock and roll" in the title - no value judgement, just sayin
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 25 May 2007 19:20 (nineteen years ago)
i don't understand
― amateurist, Saturday, 26 May 2007 01:50 (nineteen years ago)
He means that there is a parallel universe where you are billy joel, and billy joel is you
― TOMBOT, Saturday, 26 May 2007 21:34 (nineteen years ago)
The thing about calling it "Mac Genius" or "Geek Squad" is that it is designed to make the average consumer think that they are not really smart enough to do some simple computer setup tasks when, in fact, most of the tasks they need help on are probably really simple and just take a little bit of patience to figure out. If Best Buy or Apple can convince them that it takes a "Genius" to do something really basic, they can then get away with charging unreasonable rates for their service.
― Moodles, Sunday, 27 May 2007 03:34 (nineteen years ago)
In other words, I don't think it really debases these guys, quite the opposite. I think it makes them seem much more important and knowledgeable than they really are.
― Moodles, Sunday, 27 May 2007 03:36 (nineteen years ago)
The average person on the street still doesn't know what ROFL means. I know! I've tried!
― forksclovetofu, Sunday, 27 May 2007 03:58 (nineteen years ago)
The stores were born fully formed and have not required any fundamental changes. The best innovation was present on Day One: the “Genius Bar,” with a staff of diagnostic wizards whose expertise is available in one-on-one consultations — free. Pure genius. More than half of the retail store’s staff is assigned to post-sales service.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/27/business/yourmoney/27digi.html
― libcrypt, Sunday, 27 May 2007 06:16 (nineteen years ago)
the "genius bar" sounds like a sarcastic nickname for a local watering hole
― s1ocki, Sunday, 27 May 2007 07:26 (nineteen years ago)
I'm a regular
― TOMBOT, Sunday, 27 May 2007 07:46 (nineteen years ago)
It's really the industry's fault for taking advantage of the fact that if you make something complicated and proprietary there's a boatload of money to be made (by someone) fixing it for your customers when it inevitably breaks, two or three times a year if possible.
The whole "genius" thing is completely stupid. I work in IT and this is a trend that extends beyond tech support and into software development where I've seen people market themselves as the "genius" who is going to save your company's technology environment. For example, we had this one dude put his job title on his resume as "Master Geek." What a jackass.
However, to defend the lowly denizens of tech support (which I did for a year and subsequently feel depressed for the people who do it), most computer users are kind of idiots. No, actually, they aren't idiots, they are afraid of their computers--especially most users over 40. They are afraid that they don't know anything about this thing which is becoming more and more important in their lives and they are frustrated that they don't know how to fix it. The "genius" marketing concept assuages this fear by selling the fantasy that the "genius" is going to wave his magic wand and solve your problem. Sadly, it doesn't really work like that. If the "genius" conceit went away and computer manufacturers went out of their way to try to alleviate consumers' anxiety about their computer, everyone would be better off. For example, why does Apple not ship any computer with an extensive manual and handy troubleshooting guide? Oh wait, there's some cash made to be off of this fear...silly me.
― Bill in Chicago, Sunday, 27 May 2007 14:38 (nineteen years ago)
smart bars
― am0n, Sunday, 27 May 2007 14:47 (nineteen years ago)
You people are such Negative Nellys and Cynical Cindys.
― libcrypt, Sunday, 27 May 2007 19:08 (nineteen years ago)
why does Apple not ship any computer with an extensive manual and handy troubleshooting guide?
Because people don't read manuals and often lack the knowledge on how to frame their problem in the language of a prewritten text?
Your whole post is full of wrong. The fundamental reason why older people have trouble is that rather than having a cognitive gestalt of how thing works, their knowledge is entirely task based (aka here is how to run word, etc).
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 27 May 2007 19:31 (nineteen years ago)
Then why were we discussing upthread about how in the good old days you could fix your car because you knew how it worked? Or are you saying that older people are just simpletons who are only capable of figuring out that if they pull the lever they get the fish biscuit?
In some cases, they might only understand how to do things on their computer and not understand how things work, in my experience the reason they don't want to delve into why things work is that they are afraid they aren't going to get it--which is completely false.
― Bill in Chicago, Sunday, 27 May 2007 23:13 (nineteen years ago)
I got a CV once where the guy referred to himself as the 'King of Development'.
― Keith, Sunday, 27 May 2007 23:15 (nineteen years ago)
why did jon send you his resume
― TOMBOT, Sunday, 27 May 2007 23:20 (nineteen years ago)
Ha!
― Keith, Sunday, 27 May 2007 23:20 (nineteen years ago)
without getting too deep into this thread, I just want to say that most of what is wrong is with my computer I can fix myself, and the rest it I will trust to someone like Tombot, not to the zit-faced idiot at Best Buy.
And also that Miss Misery seems almost willfully clueless, and really needs to hush it.
― kenan, Sunday, 27 May 2007 23:32 (nineteen years ago)
Sam... meet Jaymc.
― kenan, Sunday, 27 May 2007 23:35 (nineteen years ago)
Thanks Kenan, love you too.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 19:00 (nineteen years ago)
Kenan, go drown in Lake Michigan. Your campaign for biggest dick on ILx is starting to get old.
― Ms Misery, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 19:03 (nineteen years ago)
waht
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 19:06 (nineteen years ago)
RREOWW
― Laurel, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 19:07 (nineteen years ago)
A Day in the Life of an Apple Genius
― libcrypt, Sunday, 3 June 2007 15:20 (nineteen years ago)
shit still irks me
― by another name (amateurist), Sunday, 11 April 2010 07:57 (sixteen years ago)
tbh this shit pisses me off mostly because people waste their money on it. like taking an interest in computers is so loathsome and degrading that you would rather send it off and pay (sometimes a lot!) of money for someone else to do it.
i design computer hardware on a pretty low level for a living and when my friends ask me (this happens often) what i do at my job i just don't know where to start.
me: i design a chip that sits inside a hard disk drivefriend: oh so is that like for a PC...or for a mac???me: change subject
i understand computers are not everyones thing but sometimes my mind just boggles at how otherwise intelligent people have absolutely zero concept of how these machines we have all become so reliant on work other than the branding of it all.
― archer's goon (tpp), Sunday, 11 April 2010 20:34 (sixteen years ago)
(this is how the machines will rise and take over btw)
― archer's goon (tpp), Sunday, 11 April 2010 20:35 (sixteen years ago)
the PCs...or the Macs???
― Ponies are horse children (Abbott), Sunday, 11 April 2010 20:36 (sixteen years ago)
loll
― archer's goon (tpp), Sunday, 11 April 2010 20:38 (sixteen years ago)
how can i tell if i am on a pcs or a macs????
― ksh, Sunday, 11 April 2010 20:39 (sixteen years ago)
am i a genius yet????
― ksh, Sunday, 11 April 2010 20:41 (sixteen years ago)
ask everyone around you whether they think ure kewl or not
― archer's goon (tpp), Sunday, 11 April 2010 20:41 (sixteen years ago)
can you design me a BBQ chip????
― ksh, Sunday, 11 April 2010 20:44 (sixteen years ago)
"otherwise intelligent" people have looked down on those who are interested in the workings of machines for years, this is nothing new. doesn't make it less annoying tho huh.
― hope this helps (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 11 April 2010 20:47 (sixteen years ago)
sometimes my mind just boggles at how otherwise intelligent people have absolutely zero concept of how these machines we have all become so reliant on work other than the branding of it all.
Why does this boggle you? I know a little about how my computer works but nothing about how my car works, or how crops are grown, or how the financial system works, and all these things are equally foundational to my everyday life. Most people don't know most things.
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 11 April 2010 21:36 (sixteen years ago)
eephus!, stop making sense!!!
― ksh, Sunday, 11 April 2010 21:56 (sixteen years ago)
i guess my mind boggles at the level of abstraction that most ppl deal with (or try to) daily given the complexity of what happens to your 1's and 0's inside your computer. i'm not saying that the ppl who design cars, grow crops or manage (or try to) the finanical system don't feel the same way of course.
― archer's goon (tpp), Monday, 12 April 2010 07:02 (sixteen years ago)
'I know a little about how my computer works but nothing about how my car works, or how crops are grown, or how the financial system works'
--dunno about this argument. i reckon if you think about it you'll realise you know kind of a few things about how plants grow, or like basic banking/free market theory, even if you wouldn't know say how to run a farm or defraud savers in a small town in wisconsin
that's not akin to the kind of knowledge people lack with computers, though, which is more like being able to cook a meal or balance your budget
― thomp, Monday, 12 April 2010 08:59 (sixteen years ago)
hey uh or like this:
Most people should feel normal treating their computers about like cars, and acknowledging that specialists should be dealing with it often -- but the big difference is that everyone knows how to use a car completely (it's not like you can be a "power user" in your Camry), which is just not true with computers.
― thomp, Monday, 12 April 2010 09:05 (sixteen years ago)
even a lot of people i know who are 'good' with computers (can help other ppl with their problems etc) don't know what a binary number system is and don't see this as strange at all
― archer's goon (tpp), Monday, 12 April 2010 09:11 (sixteen years ago)
i'm not saying that these ppl should know about this stuff really. i just think the level of abstraction that modern operating systems have achieved is truly amazing and makes it really hard for me to explain to ppl what i do. also it is interesting and i want ppl to be interested oh well.
― archer's goon (tpp), Monday, 12 April 2010 09:14 (sixteen years ago)
there are 10 kinds of people in this world tpp
― fuck in rainbows, ☔ (dyao), Monday, 12 April 2010 13:30 (sixteen years ago)
I read slashdot pretty regularly and try to maintain at least a passing interest in computers. low level hardware stuff is pretty righteous imo and you should be proud tpp that you are making today's SSDs safe for tomorrow's children
― fuck in rainbows, ☔ (dyao), Monday, 12 April 2010 13:34 (sixteen years ago)
but the big difference is that everyone knows how to use a car completely (it's not like you can be a "power user" in your Camry)
This is so not true. Unless you define "using a car" as merely going from point a to point b in it. There's so many people who don't even know how to change their oil or a flat tire.
― hope this helps (Granny Dainger), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:46 (sixteen years ago)
^truth, shamefully admits
― Nhex, Monday, 12 April 2010 15:50 (sixteen years ago)