Beastie Boys vs. Clint Black FITE

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Whose war song is worse?

http://www.clintblack.com/songlyrics.html

YOU CAN WAVE YOUR SIGNS IN PROTEST
AGAINST AMERICA TAKING STANDS
THE STANDS AMERICA'S TAKEN
ARE THE REASON THAT YOU CAN

IF EVERYONE WOULD GO FOR PEACE
THERE'D BE NO NEED FOR WAR
BUT WE CAN'T IGNORE THE DEVIL
HE'LL KEEP COMING BACK FOR MORE

SOME SEE THIS IN BLACK AND WHITE
OTHERS ONLY GRAY
BUT WE'RE NOT BEGGING FOR A FIGHT
NO MATTER WHAT THEY SAY

WE'VE GOT THE RESOLUTION
THAT SHOULD PUT

'EM ALL TO SHAME
BUT IT'S A DIFFERENT KIND OF DEADLINE
WHEN I'M CALLED IN THE GAME

CHORUS
I RAQ, I RACK'EM UP AND I ROLL
I'M BACK AND I'M A HIGH TECH GI JOE
I PRAY FOR PEACE AND PREPARE FOR WAR
AND I NEVER WILL FORGET
THERE'S NO PRICE TOO HIGH FOR FREEDOM
SO BE CAREFUL WHERE YOU TREAD

THE TERROR ISN'T MAN TO MAN
THEY CAN BE NO MORE THAN COWARDS
IF THEY WON'T SHOW US THEIR WEAPONS
WE MIGHT HAVE TO SHOW THEM OURS

IT MIGHT BE A SMART BOMB
THEY FIND STUPID PEOPLE TOO
IF YOU STAND WITH THE LIKES OF SADDAM
ONE JUST MIIGHT FIND YOU

CHORUS II
I ROCK, I RACK'EM UP AND I ROLL
I'M BACK AND I'M A HIGH TECH GI JOE
I GOT INFRARED, GPS AND GOOD OLD FASHIONED LEAD
NO PRICE TOO HIGH FOR FREEDOM
BE CAREFUL WHERE YOU TREAD

BRIDGE
NOW YOU CAN COME ALONG
OR YOU CAN STAY BEHIND
OR YOU CAN GET OUT OF THE WAY
BUT OUR TROOPS TAKE OUT THE GARBAGE
FOR THE GOOD OLD U.S.A.


I ROCK, I RACK'EM UP AND I ROLL
IN THE USA
I ROCK, I RACK'EM UP AND I ROLL
I'M TALKIN' ABOUT THE USA

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 18:50 (twenty-three years ago)

IF THEY WON'T SHOW US THEIR WEAPONS
WE MIGHT HAVE TO SHOW THEM OURS

analyze this

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 18:53 (twenty-three years ago)

lordy that's awful. but it still kills the Beasties, because, numbskulled or not, it at least seems sincere, in a Ted-Nugent-with-head-trauma kinda way.

Draft the Beasties!

OH MAN i hate them SO much.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 18:54 (twenty-three years ago)

I disagree with the sentiment, but those lyrics are FAR better than the Beastie Boys cut. I like the direct simplicity of this verse:

IT MIGHT BE A SMART BOMB
THEY FIND STUPID PEOPLE TOO
IF YOU STAND WITH THE LIKES OF SADDAM
ONE JUST MIGHT FIND YOU

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 18:54 (twenty-three years ago)

sorry shakey i had to post that on the dumb lyrics thread.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 18:56 (twenty-three years ago)

I can't believe someone would argue that these lyrics are somehow *more* honest and legitimate than the Beasties'. You criticize the Beasties' for being hamfisted and obvious, but this shit reads like a fucking 4th Grade kid wrote it! Gimme a fucking break! Percevide "Blue collar" idiot = authentic. Smartass NY Jews = inauthentic. BULLSHIT. Both songs are badly written.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 18:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Both songs are badly written.

thunderous applause

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 18:58 (twenty-three years ago)

"High tech GI Joe"

!!!

Shakey = otm

Nick A. (Nick A.), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 18:59 (twenty-three years ago)

What the hell, Shakey? Where did I bring ANY class distinction into this? The gist of my reaction to this song is that these words actually speak for people, in sentiment, tone and phrasing, while the Beastie Boys cut mirrors other's thoughts in sentiment only. This is far more effective. I haven't heard the song yet, but I definitely consider Clint Black MUCH better than the Beastie Boys.

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:01 (twenty-three years ago)

right, as i stated. but if we're gonna remain consistent with the 'VS' in the title of the thread, Clint Black's is better.

Beastie Boys should just shut up about EVERYTHING. the only thing worse than their lyrics back in the day are their lyrics after they became 'enlightened' enough to become granola-munching buddhists and marry famous feminists. Assholes.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Draft the Beasties!

OH MAN i hate them SO much.

Beastie Boys should just shut up about EVERYTHING. the only thing worse than their lyrics back in the day are their lyrics after they became 'enlightened' enough to become granola-munching buddhists and marry famous feminists. Assholes.

Damn, did Yauch run over your dog when you were a kid or something? Wow.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh man, Jess, my thoughts exactly. And GI Joe is so homoerotic as well.

Kerry (dymaxia), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:06 (twenty-three years ago)

"What the hell, Shakey? Where did I bring ANY class distinction into this? The gist of my reaction to this song is that these words actually speak for people, in sentiment, tone and phrasing,"

Which people where? Try and honestly answer this question without making any "class distinctions".

"while the Beastie Boys cut mirrors other's thoughts in sentiment only"

Their lyrics read like half the signs at the antiwar protests (joke lines included). I think the distinction you're drawing is false and is predicated on some foolish projection of Black being a "man of the people" which he most definitely is not. He's a rich redneck asshole.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:10 (twenty-three years ago)

"IF THEY WON'T SHOW US THEIR WEAPONS
WE MIGHT HAVE TO SHOW THEM OURS"


Yo - that means that G.I. Joe is giving it up for free! Either that or he's a flasher!

Kerry (dymaxia), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:11 (twenty-three years ago)

closeted guys always get off on rough trade...did you see the way simon was looking at corey on am idol last night?

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:13 (twenty-three years ago)

"Which people where? Try and honestly answer this question without making any "class distinctions"."

Umm... I still haven't given any class distinctions, Shakes. I don't get the question, "Which people where?" but I'm assuming you are asking me who this song might speak to. My family. My friends who are against the war. Comments I see on message boards. The pro-war ideas that I hear from these people ("these people" = peers, family, friends) are close to Black's song, the first verse in particular.

"Their lyrics read like half the signs at the antiwar protests (joke lines included). I think the distinction you're drawing is false and is predicated on some foolish projection of Black being a "man of the people" which he most definitely is not. He's a rich redneck asshole."

Shakes, your entire basis for these posts seems to be: a) you are anti-war (guess what? so am I!) and b) you dislike Clint Black as a person ("He's a rich redneck asshole"), not on the song itself.

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:17 (twenty-three years ago)

the neuvo riche usually have a hard time concealing their roots, when they bother at all

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:19 (twenty-three years ago)

"Shakes, your entire basis for these posts seems to be: a) you are anti-war (guess what? so am I!)"

Wrong. Note that I don't think the Beasties' song is good either.

"b) you dislike Clint Black as a person ("He's a rich redneck asshole"), not on the song itself."

Well, it's no mystery that he's rich. However, the song and the sentiments expressed - xenophobia, vaguely repressed violent homoeroticism, parotting of right-wing slogans, self-righteous expressions of strength - lead me to believe that he's a redneck asshole. Song sentiments = redneck asshole sentiments. I do not know Clint Black personally.

That you somehow find one set of lyrics more "authentic" than the other is beyond me.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Briefly, why I hate the Beasties: I am the product of two distinct but not mutually exclusive things:

1) I grew up in a place where hip hop was the law of the land. The earliest memories I have are my buddy Nasa and I bagging groceries all day so we could get $8 each and walk to the Wiz (a mile and a half away) to get the new K Solo album. If we were lucky, we'd have some change left over to have luch, which was usally a 5th Avenue bar or a Twix. Hip hop, to me, was everything. So those who mocked, misappropriated, or just plain blemished it's reputation as a culture / axis, got the gas face.

2) Beginning in high school, I walked the same path as I'm sure many of you have: punk - hardcore - emo - indie rock - psych / 'old' records - krautrock - noise - free jazz - dub - techno - etc etc etc -Black Flag to Vladislav Delay in ten steps. I discovered thru jobs at record stores, radio stations, etc. I read extensively, listened to conversations, and learned so much about music and it's history. All the great things I couldn't imagine my life without now are a result of this.

The Beastie's transgressions relating to BOTH of these things are innumerable. Their music literally make me feel ill. It shoudln't exist, and I sincerely question the taste of anyone who thinks otherwise. I got fired form a job once over a heated debate over the merits of Paul's Boutique.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Clint Black should have dealt with all the homoerotic innuendo in this song by having Big Boi add a verse about how "the female genitalia's where it's at."

EC, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:25 (twenty-three years ago)

So those who mocked, misappropriated, or just plain blemished it's reputation as a culture / axis, got the gas face.

Hmm, Beastie Boys = inauthentic, 3rd Bass = authentic?

I think my head just exploded.

hstencil, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:26 (twenty-three years ago)

did the beastie's contribute anything musically to paul's boutique (note: the reason i ask is because i saw the dust brothers perform all of paul's boutique instrumentally one time... 1995(?) sante fe loading docks in downtown LA if you have to know).

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:27 (twenty-three years ago)

they contributed some minor stuff - live instrumentation on "Looking Down the Barrel of a Gun" for example.

Shakey Mo Collie, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:30 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm sorry you lost your job over one of the greatest records ever made, Roger.

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:30 (twenty-three years ago)

actually, yr showing your ignorance here. 3rd Bass were quite authentic, and to this day, MC Serch runs Seachlight Records, which, although not a good label, releases records by independent artists. Plus, their records are better. Cactus and Derelicts of Dialect are hip hop classics, and no one who knows Slick Rick from Kool Keith will tell you different.

That siad, I never put 3rd Bass in any kind of "authentic" category in comparison to the BBoys, merely referenced one of their better songs.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh yeah - and Pete Nice's first solo album featured Kurious and Cage. Who's more authentic than fucking Kurious, dude??

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:32 (twenty-three years ago)

r.a. that wasn't my point.

hstencil, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:34 (twenty-three years ago)

uhm, the Beasties also had a crappy independent label. They were also closely affiliated with groundbreaking old school folks - ahem DEF JAM. Who's more authentic than fucking RUN DMC? That they were somehow transgressive vulture-culture-pirates seems just really... inaccurate.

But go ahead and hate them, what do I care.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Anyway, back to the Clint Black song. This line:

THERE'S NO PRICE TOO HIGH FOR FREEDOM

makes me wanna kill myself.

hstencil, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:35 (twenty-three years ago)

As this week's episode of "GI Joe" draws to a close, we find ninja/ rodeo cowboy/ high tech weapons expert Clint Black chatting with a group of children.

Clint: "Kids, the war in Iraq is justified."

Kids: "Gee, thanks Clint Black! Now we know!"

Clint: "And knowing is half the battle!

Everyone: "Yo Joe!"

EC, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:36 (twenty-three years ago)

did the beastie's contribute anything musically to paul's boutique

I'm too lazy too go look, but I don't believe the Dust Bros. have writing credits on every track.

Vic Funk, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:36 (twenty-three years ago)

shakey mo - hmm...what's more authentic than a million dollar corporation who haven't released a decent record in over a decade? How about Eastern Conference, Def Jux, Chocolate Industries, and Fondle 'em? Am I going too fast? Your Def Jam actually sued Def Jux for use of the name and logo (which was used, inexplicably, as a homage) so defend that.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:37 (twenty-three years ago)

Anyone wanna tackle the concept of "authenticity?" I'm sorry I brought it up.

hstencil, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:38 (twenty-three years ago)

how about explain what makes the Beasties authentic, instead of trying to apologize for them, and hate on true believers like 3rd Bass?

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Dude I don't think either are "authentic" 'cause that's the faultiest concept ever!

hstencil, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Def Jam in the early 80s is not the Def Jam of 2003, Rog. Come on now.

I agree completely w/hstencil (surprise).

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Back to the Clint Black song - I'm wondering if there's a video for this...? Hopefully of him strumming his guitar in front of an American flag w/a clip mic, intercut with footage of the Mother of All Bombs inflicting some motherly love on those goddam towelheads (and the French too!)

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:42 (twenty-three years ago)

I think, by law, we're only supposed to refer to them as "F****h" now.

hstencil, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Hmm, Beastie Boys = inauthentic, 3rd Bass = authentic?

I think my head just exploded.

-- hstencil

I didn't even use the word until you did. I agree it's a faulty concept, definitely, but since it's on the table, and ONLY becuz it's hip hop we're talking about, I think it may as well be addressed.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:45 (twenty-three years ago)

then address it instead of mistaking the Def Jam of now with the Def Jam of 18 years ago

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:48 (twenty-three years ago)

The authenticity thing is gobbledygook I think. Clint Black's lyrics are assholish. But *as sloganeering* they are better constructed than the Beasties'. I can say this because CB's lyrics get me cross which is what sloganeering I'm opposed to should do, whereas the BB lyrics make me cringe even though I'm on their side.

(Though this might be an example of the left's horror of populism)

I avoided this thread for 38 posts cos I was confusing Clint Black with Clint BOON!

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:51 (twenty-three years ago)

actually, Shakey used it first, in a different context.

You wrote "So those who mocked, misappropriated, or just plain blemished it's reputation as a culture / axis, got the gas face."

I suppose I can ask you why you think the Beastie Boys "mocked, misappropriated, or just plain blemished [hip hop's] reputation as a culture / axis," but I just plain don't have any stake in it (I don't really care about them OR hip hop all that much), plus it's probably a much bigger subject designed for a different thread. I will say that I found your assertation pretty bizarre, and as it was related to your personal experience with grocery-bagger poverty, pretty about what's "authentic" in hip hop and what isn't.

I haven't heard either song, but they both seem pretty lousy, but I'd give the Beastie Boys a little more benefit of the doubt than what I've seen on this thread so far.

hstencil, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:51 (twenty-three years ago)

should say I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt because I agree with them, as opposed to, say, Tom's point above. Although I understand that too.

hstencil, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:53 (twenty-three years ago)

how is it a mistake?? and what does Russell Simmons have to do with the Beastie Boys? They haven't been on that label in how long? and, for what it's worth, THAT era Beastie Boys is far less offensive to me than anything post-Paul's Boutique (but still really, really shitty music IMO). At least they had the good sense to have Kerry King on a track (though that was probably - actually, definitely - Rick Rubin's idea).

Why they don't get Vanilla Ice status I'll never know.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Hstencil put it this way: I am unhappier that Clint Black's song exists, even though on its own terms it is a better song.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, it's no mystery that he's rich. However, the song and the sentiments expressed - xenophobia, vaguely repressed violent homoeroticism, parotting of right-wing slogans, self-righteous expressions of strength - lead me to believe that he's a redneck asshole. Song sentiments = redneck asshole sentiments. I do not know Clint Black personally.

That you somehow find one set of lyrics more "authentic" than the other is beyond me.

Where did I ever use the word "authentic?" Is it the same place that I placed class distinctions on these two songs (i.e. nowhere)? You are right about all of those sentiments that are expressed in these lyrics, and I am simply stating that those sentiments are also expressed by many people who consider an invasion into Iraq justified, hence it's not preachy so much as reflecting ideas that are held by many people (however wrong they might be). You are moralizing this song. I'm not. I'm looking at it as objectively as I can.

By the way, I just love the pro-war = "redneck asshole" idea. You're so considerate!

This comment from Tom: But *as sloganeering* they are better constructed than the Beasties' is all that I've been saying.

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:55 (twenty-three years ago)

Why they don't get Vanilla Ice status I'll never know.

All of their other work aside, for simply releasing The In Sound From Way Out, they are completely inelligible for "Vanilla Ice status".

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Roger Adultery:

So, let me get this straight: because you grew up buying bad K-Solo records (I know, I bought "Tell the World My Name" too), you are more authentic than the Beasties, who actively sought out hip-hop in the early '80s when it wasn't "the law" for white dudes to do so, and then helped bring the music to a much wider audience (including to your sorry ass, most likely, whether you acknowledge it or not)?

And what about your own musical path? You're true school enough to attack the BB's, but it's okay for you to get into krautrock? I'd say you're both "products of your environment" (pun intended)

And no matter what you say, "Derelicts of Dialect" sucks big donkey dick.

triple stage darkness, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:59 (twenty-three years ago)

"This comment from Tom: But *as sloganeering* they are better constructed than the Beasties' is all that I've been saying. "

I guess Tom just said it better. You've implied that Black is speaking for people and that the Beasties are not, which I think is a groundless assertion and is pretty independent from Tom's point.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:02 (twenty-three years ago)

I guess Tom just said it better. You've implied that Black is speaking for people and that the Beasties are not, which I think is a groundless assertion and is pretty independent from Tom's point.

The grounds of my assertion is a personal one: in the thread on the Beastie Boys song no one (that I can remember) could say anything positive about its lyrics (other than it was anti-war), while I have heard close approximations of Black's lyrics from people that I know, not to mention that Darryl Worley's similarly themed song is currently barrelling up the country charts. The real test will be which song -- Beasties or Black -- gets more airplay. It'll be Black by a landslide, I predict. But of course I say this because I hate all blue collar rednecks and I think they're stupid and they'll fall for anything. That's what you've been reading all along, right?

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:06 (twenty-three years ago)

The Beasties lyrics, just for the record, for those who don't know what the fuck they're comparing the utterly churlish Clint Black lyrics to:


In a world gone mad it’s hard to think right
So much violence hate and spite
Murder going on all day and night
Due time we fight the non-violent fight

Mirrors, smokescreens and lies
It’s not the politicians but their actions I despise
You and Saddam should kick it like back in the day
With the cocaine and Courvoisier
But you build more bombs as you get more bold
As your mid-life crisis war unfolds
All you want to do is take control
Now put that axis of evil bullshit on hold
Citizen rule number 2080
Politicians are shady
So people watch your back 'cause I think they smoke crack
I don’t doubt it look at how they act

In a world gone mad it’s hard to think right
So much violence hate and spite
Murder going on all day and night
Due time we fight the non-violent fight

First the ‘War On Terror’ now war on Iraq
We’re reaching a point where we can’t turn back
Let’s lose the guns and let’s lose the bombs
And stop the corporate contributions that their built upon
Well I’ll be sleeping on your speeches ‘til I start to snore
‘Cause I won’t carry guns for an oil war
As-Salamu alaikum, wa alaikum assalam
Peace to the Middle East peace to Islam
Now don’t get us wrong ‘cause we love America
But that’s no reason to get hysterica
They’re layin’ on the syrup thick
We ain’t waffles we ain’t havin’ it

In a world gone mad it’s hard to think right
So much violence hate and spite
Murder going on all day and night
Due time we fight the non-violent fight

Now how many people must get killed?
For oil families pockets to get filled?
How many oil families get killed?
Not a damn one so what’s the deal?

It’s time to lead the way and de-escalate
Lose the weapons of mass destruction and the hate
Say ooh ah what’s the White House doin’?
Oh no! Say, what in tarnation have they got brewing??!!!!???!!
Well I’m not pro Bush and I’m not pro Saddam
We need these fools to remain calm
George Bush you’re looking like Zoolander
Trying to play tough for the camera
What am I on crazy pills? We’ve got to stop it
Get your hand out my grandma’s pocket
We need health care more than going to war
You think it’s democracy they’re fighting for?

In a world gone mad it’s hard to think right
So much violence hate and spite
Murder going on all day and night
Due time we fight the non-violent fight

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:06 (twenty-three years ago)

The real test will be which song -- Beasties or Black -- gets more airplay.

hmm, so airplay is predicated upon what songs are popular? Are songs popular because they're inherently so, or because they're played on radio?

hstencil, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Thanks Sean.

tigerbalmnuts (nickalicious), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)

So, let me get this straight: because you grew up buying bad K-Solo records (I know, I bought "Tell the World My Name" too


tocuhe

), you are more authentic than the Beasties, who actively sought out hip-hop in the early '80s when it wasn't "the law" for white dudes to do so, and then helped bring the music to a much wider audience (including to your sorry ass, most likely, whether you acknowledge it or not)?

wrong, in a big, big way. Beastie shad nothing to do with me discovering hip-hop - NOTHING! I actually saw Video Music Box onc when I wasvery young, and was hooked ever since.

And what about your own musical path? You're true school enough to attack the BB's, but it's okay for you to get into krautrock? I'd say you're both "products of your environment" (pun intended)

not really. None of us popped out of the womb with Liquid Liquid records in our hands. I 'discovered' Krautrock almost nine years ago, and, being fifteen, I think that's a pretty early introduction to it.

And no matter what you say, "Derelicts of Dialect" sucks big donkey dick.

nah - there are some good moments - if only for pop goes the weasel, and portrait of an artist as a hood.

i'd still take Poor Righteous Teachers over either, though

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)

"in the thread on the Beastie Boys song no one (that I can remember) could say anything positive about its lyrics (other than it was anti-war),"

At the risk of repeating myself (something that seems necessary a lot on ILM): The Beastie Boys lyrics read like half the signs at the antiwar protests, joke lines included. Just because no one *here* voices such one-dimensional expressions, doesn't mean there aren't those out there who *do* (like, say, my mother - since you're fond of personal anecdotal evidence). And while no one here claimed the Beasties' were speaking for them, no one has really agreed w/Clint Black's lyrics either - dunno why you would disqualify the Beasties song on those grounds. If we're going on personal anecdotal evidence, I have mine that counters yours and we're back to square 1. Tom's analysis has to do with his own personal reaction to the song and how that reflects how the songs work, I think that's more valid.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:23 (twenty-three years ago)

you can say that again.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:23 (twenty-three years ago)

gygax will be here all night, ladies and gennelmen!

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I brought up personal evidence solely because I was suddenly accused of being a stereotyping classist. Of course the plural of anecdote != data, but I was trying to satisfy your bristling aggressiveness (which still hasn't abided). My original stance was Tom's, a personal reaction to the song, but since you decided to paint me with an overly simplistic brush in reaction ("you are dishonest and romanticize poor people," seems to be the gist of it), I felt I had to shift my focus, albeit into a small, fruitless corner.

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Juxtaposed up against the Black lyrics, the jokes in the Beasies one seem downright clever and whitty (which they aren't).

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:33 (twenty-three years ago)

wrong, in a big, big way. Beastie shad nothing to do with me discovering hip-hop - NOTHING! I actually saw Video Music Box onc when I wasvery young, and was hooked ever since.

the Beasties helped create the context that made it socially acceptable for you, a white guy, to get into hip-hop -- they helped make it "the law," as you say, where you grew up. and they made some great records along the way.

I'd say you're both "products of your environment" (pun intended)

my point here is that you take the Beasties to task for not being authentic hip-hop, and then you rattle off a laundry list of different music that your dilletante ass has gotten into ("punk - hardcore - emo - indie rock - psych / 'old' records - krautrock - noise - free jazz - dub - techno"). but you can righteously dismiss them because you watched Video Music Box once?

triple stage darkness, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:35 (twenty-three years ago)

I can righteously dismiss them because I have the grounds to do so. A far as the notion that somehow Beasties Boys brought hip hop to us whites (and why do you assume that I am one?) is absurd. No one I grew up with liked the Beastie Boys - the frat kids and the jocks did. We were into hip hop - not the reactionary rantings of a bunch of privelaged cultural vampires. All this aside - do you truly believe, in your heart, that ANY of the Beastie Boys possess an iota of skill on the mic? You couldn't possibly believe that.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:41 (twenty-three years ago)

privileged? you mean like the ultra middle-class L.L. Cool J and Run-D.M.C.?

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Which is the more "authentic" country album: Ray Charles' "Modern Sounds in Country and Western Music" or Charlie Pride's "The Pride of Country Music?"

Which is the more "authentic" food, steak frites, french fries, or freedom fries?

Which is the more "authentic" GI Joe toy, the Star Wars-sized action figures, or the big dolls with the fuzzy hair?

EC, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:43 (twenty-three years ago)

no - i mean privelaged like The Strokes and Sophia Copploa.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:44 (twenty-three years ago)

All this aside - do you truly believe, in your heart, that ANY of the Beastie Boys possess an iota of skill on the mic?

Yes. Not to mention skills with drums, guitars, basses, keyboards (although big thanks go to Money Mark in that dept.!), samples, loops, echos, etc, etc. Not to mention Ad Rock was great in that biker movie he starred in with John Doe from X.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:45 (twenty-three years ago)

"No one I grew up with liked the Beastie Boys"

I knew plenty who did - mostly Jews (and we were not fratboys or jocks, I assure you) and the few black kids I knew. I won "Paul Revere" and "The King of Rock" 45s at this one bar mitzvah... "memorieeeeeees"...

"do you truly believe, in your heart, that ANY of the Beastie Boys possess an iota of skill on the mic?"

Sorry, I do believe this. They have three amazing and groundbreaking records that I know every word to.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:46 (twenty-three years ago)

really? Wow. Do you umm, err, *like* hip hop?

and you actually, like, sing along? Do you think that the use of a bullhorn to cover up piss poor lyrics and mic skills is a cool idea? Do you agree it's good to have girls around to do the dishes, but that the disrespect of them has "got to be through?"

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Roger, you do realize that the lyrics to "Girls" were a joke, right?

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Roger, have you ever heard the word "pedant"?

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:54 (twenty-three years ago)

I love hip-hop. I've been following it since I was in elementary school and kids were breakdancing on folded-out cardboard boxes on the playground. I'm not gonna answer any of yr "questions" because a) you don't care what the answers are, and b) they're loaded questions that do little besides reflect your own inexplicable vitriol towards the band.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:56 (twenty-three years ago)

yes, and I am not one (though i've been accused as such before)

i guess, then, that the whole first two albums were a "joke" - the "lotta beer, lotta girls and a lot of cursing" was all, supposed to be, umm, ironic, right? yeah, now I get it. they're geniuses, clearly.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:57 (twenty-three years ago)

I've always been very grateful to "Licensed to Ill" for forcing me to acknowledge that a record could be owned and appreciated by every dumb jock in town and still be a great record.

Now that I'm no longer in high school, and thus not invested in S.E. Hinton-style youth subculture rumbles, this revelation seems a bit less vital, but I still try to remember that an album shouldn't be judged by the people who buy it.

EC, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 20:59 (twenty-three years ago)

EC is OTM

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:01 (twenty-three years ago)

yes, and I am not one (though i've been accused as such before)

maybe you ought to take the hint

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:02 (twenty-three years ago)

"a record could be owned and appreciated by every dumb jock in town and still be a great record."

Andrew WK to thread!!!

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Shakey don't call gygax! a dumb jock, you'll hurt his feelings.

hstencil, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:03 (twenty-three years ago)

do dumb jocks actually own Andrew W.K. records? this is a serious question--I honesly have no idea

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:05 (twenty-three years ago)

I just refuse to believe that those records are meant to be ironic, or jokes. I mean, didn't I hear that the beastie themselves don't want them to be re-pressed?? they're EMBARRASSED and rightfully so.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, no one's ever grown up and been embarrassed about stupid jokes they made in their adolescence. Never.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:07 (twenty-three years ago)

dumb jox own AWK CDs = as do it = i am a dumb jox0r = i don't play sports (only scrabble) = i am just plain dumb (but i like to party)

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Since AWK only sold about 50,000 albums total (and probably 75% of them in NYC and LA), I would doubt it, Matos.

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:09 (twenty-three years ago)

that's what I figured, y@nc3y, just wanted to make sure

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:10 (twenty-three years ago)

nick - i'm not saying that. but they were defending that stuff as a joke - as a joke THEN - not in a "boy were we stupid" in retrospect way - in a "this is SO subversive, we'll teach people how NOT to treat women" way THEN.
please.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Ira's Trouser Press piece convinced me to give AWK another shot, and I totally dig the record now.

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:14 (twenty-three years ago)

i never knew guys existed like Yanc3y

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Whaddaya mean?

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:16 (twenty-three years ago)

"do dumb jocks actually own Andrew W.K. records?"

Oh I don't really know at all, I was kinda joking. Just seemed to me like a lot of the anti-Andrew WK stuff had to do with people hating his perceived audience - whether or not that was *actually* his audience is obviously open to question.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:17 (twenty-three years ago)

his perceived audience = record geeks in on the joke. so yeah, given the amount of self-loathing that goes on in serious record-geek circles, I would say there's hatred-of-perceived-audience going on!

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:30 (twenty-three years ago)

...but now that i do i'd really like to get to know you...*

[it's all coming back can you feel it?]*

**hint: lyrics.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:32 (twenty-three years ago)

if that's for me gygax i'm totally clueless

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:34 (twenty-three years ago)

"his perceived audience = record geeks in on the joke. "

Oh, I can think of a number of people off-hand who thought that his record was aimed at the "worst violent sexist fratjock element of American society" (I'm paraphrasing here) and summarily denounced it.

Of course, those people hate fun you know.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:35 (twenty-three years ago)

I've wanted to ask that question before anyway so bringing it up just made it that much easier; thanks!

also, I didn't like the record very much myself--got too overbearing, y'know? still, individual songs are fun

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Nothing is fun, all is hate, death to Andrew WK and his idiocies (said with a smile on my face).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 22:12 (twenty-three years ago)

DO NOT FEED THE TROLL

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 22:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I wonder what Andrew WK's war song would be like. Pro- or anti-? Hard to say, altho I would hope it would be an anti-war song about partying.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 22:18 (twenty-three years ago)

...an anti-war song about partying. =

"Party At Ground Zero"

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 22:19 (twenty-three years ago)

one of Fishbone's finest moments - YES!

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 22:21 (twenty-three years ago)

this is the magic moment:

Shakey, meet nickalicious.
nickalicious, meet Shakey.

hstencil, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 22:22 (twenty-three years ago)

re: AWK on war

from "i get wet":

You're making wars,
You're breaking doors,
And now you're on the floor.
I really don't care,
I really don't care.
I know you're tryin' to get somewhere.
You watch what I say,
(Watch what I say),
Watch what I do.
Because I really don't care,
I really don't care,
You're never gonna go nowhere.

i think he's saying that he doesn't care, but warns that "you" (bush, the usa, warriors at large) aren't gonna go nowhere (avoiding analysis of what double negative may suggest).

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 22:23 (twenty-three years ago)

you sure that lyric's not a comment on anybody in the noise underground, gygax!?

hstencil, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 22:30 (twenty-three years ago)

Bob Roberts lives! Goddamnit!

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 23:21 (twenty-three years ago)

is it possible clint b is calculatedly "playing" a redneck asshole here bcz that's how *he* perceives his audience? (ie it's assholishly written on purpose: his version of populism in urgent times, complete i guess with implicit patronising contempt for his own main blue-collar audience)

(i am totally not an expert on CB or his audience, and wd probbly like never to become one, i think: but the distinction — if this is one being made — that CB has *no* self-reflexive sociopolitical awareness bcz he's mainstream and reactionary and blah blah blah, compared to the beasties and their over-reflexive arty-liberal new york yadda yadda, seems a bit of a mistake)

(also: can you entirely tell how good/bad songwords are by reading them only?)

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 13 March 2003 15:51 (twenty-three years ago)

(maybe this point was already made, i skipped thru all the guff abt authenticity)

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 13 March 2003 15:55 (twenty-three years ago)

An airplay update: the Beasties cut has gotten 197 spins since Tuesday, while the Clint Black song has gotten only 43 spins since Tuesday (Darryl Worley's "Have You Forgotten," which is similar in theme to the Black song, has gotten 9129 spins since Tuesday).

Mark, you may be right about Black's motives, especially considering how huge "patriotic" tunes have been on country radio (Worley, Toby Keith, Alan Jackson, Charlie Daniels). It could simply be opportunism...

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 13 March 2003 16:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Having seen a video of Clint Black performing this piece, I am now completely ashamed for the entire human race. I had no idea it could be so bad.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 13 March 2003 18:08 (twenty-three years ago)

in-depth video description please!!

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 13 March 2003 18:17 (twenty-three years ago)

It wasn't really a video in the eMpTyV sense, but just a performance...just seeing the sincerity on Black's face as he sings the chorus (the "high tech GI Joe" line and especially the "...good ol' fashioned lead" line) seriously made me want to puke. It might not effect others like I did, but with my extreme distaste for attempts to romanticize violence, especially when it comes to the military...I don't know, it just seemed so sterile to read, but when he was actually singing the song, it was just too much for me. I'll listen to the Beastie's a-couple-bland-jokes over this jingoistic ignorant horse-blinders-wearing bullshit A BILLION TRILLION GOOGLE GAZILLION TIMES.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 13 March 2003 18:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Mark - where does the contempt for his audience become implicit? Does this come from interpreting the song as patronizing/talking down to his perceived audience? I don't have a problem looking at this as an opportunistic exploitation of the current market and current events (I think that's definitely the case no matter how you interpret his lyrical stance).

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 13 March 2003 18:47 (twenty-three years ago)

yes: if he's writing the song sincerely (in the sense of "i clint black am pro war and think you my fan should be also"), but ios then thinking ("how do i put this argument in a language my fans will understand, even tghough i realise it's going to be a bit demagogic?"), i think there's a contempt implicit there

he may well be writing the song entirely insincerely, or indeed putting the argument the best way he knows, in which case the contempt is not (nec3essarily) present

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 13 March 2003 18:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Country radio is kicking rock and pop radio's ass right now in terms of actually acknowledging the war - neverminding Clint Black or Toby Keith (and neverminding that the sentiments of either song aren't nearly as harsh as "Okie from Muskogee", albeit neither gives as good slogan as "love it or leave it" either)(and also neverminding that Clint Black is looking for a label, hence he needs a hit, bad, hence this, or that 90% of the critics who wrote about Toby Keith's anthem never wrote about him before that nevermind him outselling Missy, nevermind Wilco), I doubt you can listen to country radio for a half hour without hearing "Have You Forgotten" or "Tin Soldier" (the only great song on this list, besides "Okie" of course), whereas you could listen to to rock or pop radio for as long as you wanted and have no idea anything was going on in the world at large, beyond it being shorty's birthday and people gossiping about Missy. I also found it odd how much heat "Where Were You When the World Stopped Turning" got from some sectors, apparently of the not knowing the difference between Iraq and Iran line (because apparently the working class should have no more pressing issues than the geo-politics of the Middle East, nevermind paying the bills), even though the song's decidedly pro-peace, while being alot more nuanced than, say, "Let's Roll" or "The Rising" or "Far Away" despite being released alot sooner than any of these records (it was on the radio, what, a week after 9/11?).

P, Thursday, 13 March 2003 20:33 (twenty-three years ago)

"the working class should have no more pressing issues than the geo-politics of the Middle East, nevermind paying the bills"

You do realize that these two things (Middle Eastern geopolitics and "paying the bills") are very very closely related, don't you? Would you like me to quote you the current average price of gasoline in the US? Or remind you that automobile sales make up a full *20%* of consumer spending in this country?

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 13 March 2003 22:51 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, I realize they're related, I just don't think it's a disgrace that Alan Jackson (or my dad) don't subscribe to Foreign Affairs, drop the term 'likudniks' into everyday conversation, or know Richard Perle's bio inside out. I don't think it's a disgrace for Alan Jackson or his audience to have different priorities than their critics demand of them, or to not have the time in their day to devote more 'thought' to the issue than simply watching the news and showing up on election day (not everybody can afford to go to gradschool ya know). But since apparently musicians and thier audience are supposed to have a firm grasp on international affairs and the ins and outs of state dept. loop intrigues, please tell me your's or Ad-Roc's stance on the Adnan Kashoggi brouhaha or 50 Cent's thoughts on Japan forward deployment of that cruiser. Do tell please.

P, Thursday, 13 March 2003 23:49 (twenty-three years ago)

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=87&u=/030313/143/3ia96.html&printer=1

P, Thursday, 13 March 2003 23:54 (twenty-three years ago)

"watching the news and showing up on election day "

hah! Most Americans can't even handle doing either of those! I hear your point about not expecting everyone to hold a PhD in geopolitics, but I can't defend willful ignorance, and I don't think there's another country in the world that has a more deliberately uninformed populace than the US. Encouraging that myopia (a la Clint Black or Alan Jackson or whoever) is not a good thing.

As for the news story link, the Dixie Chicks handled that rather admirably, I think.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2003 00:01 (twenty-three years ago)

But how is country music more myopic than pop or rock when such a huge chunk of the music acknowledges the war and the issues America faces post-9/11 (albeit in a way you might not agree with), while most rap or rock or pop (that gets airplay at least) doesn't acknowledge it at all? How is "Have You Forgotten" more myopic than "In Da Club"?

P, Friday, 14 March 2003 00:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Wow, go Dixie Chicks (seriously).

Sam Jeffries (samjeff), Friday, 14 March 2003 00:10 (twenty-three years ago)

"But how is country music more myopic than pop or rock when such a huge chunk of the music acknowledges the war and the issues America faces post-9/11 (albeit in a way you might not agree with), while most rap or rock or pop (that gets airplay at least) doesn't acknowledge it at all? How is "Have You Forgotten" more myopic than "In Da Club"?"

Hey, so far I think the only people who are coming out looking good are the Dixie Chicks! And maybe Steve Earle and Mr. Lif. The Beasties song is bad, mainstream hip-hop had its political balls severed a long time ago, pop hasn't addressed any real issues directly since maybe the early 80s... I'm not defending these other genres. You're right that Country at least acknowledges the issue, albeit in its traditionally reactionary, "proud to be dumb" way. I'm not sure if that's better than not addressing it at all. Maybe it is. At least it ignites debate, which is always good.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2003 00:14 (twenty-three years ago)

See also this thread

EC, Friday, 14 March 2003 00:27 (twenty-three years ago)

This guy has forgotten that no 9/11 terrorist can be traced to Iraq. I could go on and on and on about how wrong this song is, but let it speak for itself.

(3/26/03, 6 p.m. ET) -- Darryl Worley joined Toby Keith to perform for the President of the United States and military families at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Florida Wednesday morning (March 26).

Have You Forgotten
Darryl Worley
Written by Darryl Worley and Wynn Varble
-----------------------------------------------------

I hear people saying we don't need this war
I say there's some things worth fighting for
What about our freedom and this piece of ground?
We didn't get to keep 'em by backing down
They say we don't realize the mess we're getting in
Before you start preaching
Let me ask you this my friend

CHORUS 1
Have you forgotten how it felt that day
To see your homeland under fire
And her people blown away?
Have you forgotten when those towers fell?
We had neighbors still inside
Going through a living hell
And you say we shouldn't worry 'bout Bin Laden
Have you forgotten?

They took all the footage off my T.V.
Said it's too disturbing for you and me
It'll just breed anger that's what the experts say
If it was up to me I'd show it every day
Some say this country's just out looking for a fight
After 9/11 man I'd have to say that's right

CHORUS 1
Have you forgotten how it felt that day
To see your homeland under fire
And her people blown away?
Have you forgotten when those towers fell?
We had neighbors still inside
Going through a living hell
And we vowed to get the ones behind Bin Laden
Have you forgotten?

I've been there with the soldiers
Who've gone away to war
And you can bet that they remember
Just what they're fighting for

CHORUS 2
Have you forgotten all the people killed?
Yes, some went down like heroes in that Pennsylvania field
Have you forgotten about our Pentagon?
All the loved ones that we lost
And those left to carry on
Don't you tell me not to worry 'bout Bin Laden
Have you forgotten?

Have you forgotten?
Have you forgotten?

C 2003 EMI April Music Inc./Pittsburg Landing Songs (ASCAP)

david day (winslow), Thursday, 27 March 2003 22:09 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.