A logistical beatdown for s trife and his paranoid delusions.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
s trife. Knock off the shit.
Your baseless and snide accusations of greed and racism are rude, insulting and tiresome.
Just because Geir and Calum are not currently blighting this forum does NOT mean that there's a "Troll Vaccuum" that needs to be filled. I myself prefer it when the niche of UberTroll to be left vacant.

Just remember that you DON'T ACTUALLY KNOW *JACK SHIT* about the other posters on this forum. So you don't have enough any evidence to back up your accusations of Ku Kluxerism.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:24 (twenty-two years ago)

he knew i was a raging homophobe tho. Thanks, trife! I almost forgot.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:28 (twenty-two years ago)

taking sides: trifeian devil's advocacy/baiting vs. custos's braindead dalek "humor"

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:30 (twenty-two years ago)

as a wise man once said, no comment

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:31 (twenty-two years ago)

sarcastic answer to jess: EX - TER - MIN - ATE! EX - TER - MIN - ATE! EX - TER - MIN - ATE!
serious answer to jess: Why do you hate me so? I've never done anything to you.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:34 (twenty-two years ago)

im as much a fuckin devils advocate as geir was, i guess if you dont believe in the ilm party line you must be trolling!!!

trife (simon_tr), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:35 (twenty-two years ago)

but jess whenever trife starts flinging accusations around the depths of ilx id call forth exactly the strawman he's been attacking.

Like I wanna know what Dee thinks is black ppl. with "good taste" & if it involves eating watermelon or playing them blues.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:35 (twenty-two years ago)

dude, i never said i was choosing custos!!

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:36 (twenty-two years ago)

don't forget to shit on me too guys, I'm a big asshole

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:36 (twenty-two years ago)

geir wasn't a devil's advocate. he apparently believed everything he said

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:37 (twenty-two years ago)

What's the number to that ILM party line?

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:37 (twenty-two years ago)

well sterl you know things were sorta bad for them 'way back when'

trife (simon_tr), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:37 (twenty-two years ago)

don't you guys have to go make lame passes at the "ladies of ile" *winks*

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:38 (twenty-two years ago)

don't you have to go hide from the world in a closet?

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:39 (twenty-two years ago)

there's a first time for everything

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:39 (twenty-two years ago)

anyway thats what i was saying, thinking me or geir or whoever is 'trolling' because you disagree with them is bullshit!! liking p didy or genesis over boring indie isnt contrarian its RIGHT

trife (simon_tr), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:39 (twenty-two years ago)

(crosspost)

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:40 (twenty-two years ago)

haha good one "oops" *high fives*

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:40 (twenty-two years ago)

trife: running into a chatroom and accusing everyone in it of being a bigot is mean, tracherous and wrong. ESPECIALLY if it isn't true.
(and don't give me any "yer in denial" horseshit, either.)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:41 (twenty-two years ago)

you mean its still sorta wrong if it IS true?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I still hate that one song Puffy and Sting did

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:43 (twenty-two years ago)

No, it's COMPLETELY wrong if it ISN'T true.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:43 (twenty-two years ago)

(crosspost)
And it's still rude to accuse every single person on the forum of bigotry even if its only ONE chicklet lobed morlock with pretentions of Nazihood who happens to be mouthing off at any given moment.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:45 (twenty-two years ago)

thats funny comin from the custos who thinks black people who wear suits are uncle toms and is always going on about cibo matto being 'naughty oriental hotties' on some sucky fucky me love you long time bullshit

trife (simon_tr), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:46 (twenty-two years ago)

haha

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I want to see exactly the post you are referring to. (and I BETTER BE SAYING *EXACTLY* THAT.)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:47 (twenty-two years ago)

so, uh, is this thread somehow related to the 900 post David frickin' Matthews Band thread which I haven't yet checked out? or something?

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:50 (twenty-two years ago)

No, the musicians punch in the face one. So fun.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Um I was told this was going to be a "logical beatdown"? Is this the wrong forum? I knew I should have called first. . .

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:54 (twenty-two years ago)

trife +3 charisma

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I've just went a searching across ILM and the only instance of anyone talking about "oriental hotties" is when a troll called "xx" started mouthing off about my (platonic) love of Shonen Knife and their music.
It was xx who made the racist/sexist comment about oriental women.
(xx was another one who loved to make accusations based on nothing but the paranoid delusions within his fevered brane.)

...as for the "uncle tom" comment, I'm doing another search right now.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:56 (twenty-two years ago)

trife -7 wisdom

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 01:57 (twenty-two years ago)

thats funny comin from the custos who thinks black people who wear suits are uncle toms...
no, the funny thing is: this sentence is the only sentense on the entire forum where the phrase "uncle tom" is in the same sentence as "custos"; so, trife, you are hallucinating *again*.

trife -7 more wisdom.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh thanks Ned, yeah I had pretty much given up on that thread after the Avril comments.

It's funny when you see threads repeatedly rise to the top of 'New Answers', the natural assumptions is that it is more of the same old idiocy playing out over and over. I guess I need to learn to click on 'em once and a while. The punch thread is kind of funny how the minute Julio shows up, Ronan chimes in with an attack on him. Good old ILM.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:01 (twenty-two years ago)

some days i feel like one of those people on the dancefloor staggering around at 5 am, when all the sane people left at 3

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Suchin Pak & Gideon Yago: c or D ? CUSTOS WANTS "ORIENTAL HOTTIES WHO DONT SPEAK ENGLISH"

trife (simon_tr), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:04 (twenty-two years ago)

HA HA

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Ouch.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:07 (twenty-two years ago)

...and what I said is malevolent, how, exactly?
I saw her being interviewed and I honestly think she would be great as a VJ. The lack of aptitude in English would be a plus in the beginning.

an Amatuerists idea might work well too: "The Japanese girl and the menacing silent guy could share the news desk too."

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:08 (twenty-two years ago)

(diamond the dmb thread is all ilx regulars picking on 15yr old fans. it's like killing butterflies or something.)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:09 (twenty-two years ago)

custos "oriental" is a racial slur

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:09 (twenty-two years ago)

but this still doesn't prove that I'm some kind of Nazi. Thats what you seem to imply to everyone that you yell at it all those other threads.
(xpost)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:10 (twenty-two years ago)

custos "oriental" is a racial slur
Oh, Thats a load of horseshit.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Thats like saying European is a cuss word.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:11 (twenty-two years ago)

?!!?!

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:11 (twenty-two years ago)

What it proves is that you have a secret love for young boys, Custos.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Hahahahaha!
Calum is my secret love child!

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:13 (twenty-two years ago)

we people of the east much prefer to be called "young hottt asian sluts who love it" thank you very much.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:14 (twenty-two years ago)

custos you mentioned those 'orientals' appropos of nothing in that suchin pak thread!! custos is the guy who meets someone and says 'hey i see youre black!! you know whos black, my car mechanic, do you know him'

trife (simon_tr), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:15 (twenty-two years ago)

No, but seriously....
weird but true story:
I was once in a Denny's talking with some co-workers, and I mentioned that a friend of mine was taking classes to improve her English. She's an Indian, I said. And some complete stranger behind us clucked her tongue and said "you can't call her that. You have to say 'Native American. It's racist to call her an Indian."
And I turned around and said "Her name is Priya Jayanchandra and she's from India. People from India prefer to be called Indians."

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:16 (twenty-two years ago)

political correctness gone mad!!!!

trife (simon_tr), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Did she slap your face for being a smug smart ass?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:17 (twenty-two years ago)

custos you mentioned those 'orientals' appropos of nothing in that suchin pak thread!! custos is the guy who meets someone and says 'hey i see youre black!! you know whos black, my car mechanic, do you know him'
No, trife. I have never done anything like that in my entire life. In fact...i've never met a real person in the real world who does that. In fact...I can't even remember anyone on TV ever doing that.
WHERE DO YOU GET THESE C-RAAA-ZEEE IDEAS?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:18 (twenty-two years ago)

actually people from india prefer to be called by their given names, just like most people.....

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Did she slap your face for being a smug smart ass?
No, everyone nervously chuckled. She blushed and nervously offered an apology and slunk away.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:19 (twenty-two years ago)

seriously fuck all of you people, if these threads are any evidence is the fact that bored sad fucks on a monday night have nothing better to do than spit venom and bile at each other over the most pointless topics since Star Trek, including myself, and regardless of color or creed (though having a penis does seem to be prerequisite)

can we lock these threads and be done already?

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:20 (twenty-two years ago)

just another victim of a custos 'logistical beatdown'!!

trife (simon_tr), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Pity. It would have made a better story.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:20 (twenty-two years ago)

custos was that dennys in alabama by any chance?

trife (simon_tr), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:21 (twenty-two years ago)

please please no with the D & D references, I feel like a big enough geek as it is

what beautiful about trife's position w/r/t Dee is that he gets to pretend that bling-bling isn't fucking tacky as all hell, since he's got this dichotomoy going: EITHER you think all rap videos should be shot in the ghetto, OR you think there's nothing tacky at all about spending fucking umpteen-billion on yer video so it can have, like, helicopters & jet-skis in it

(there are, of course, several other possibilties in between)

finally: liking p didy or genesis over boring indie isnt contrarian its RIGHT

dude even the most boringest indie ever is better than P Diddy

(after trying to post and there's thirty million new answers: P.S. trife is right, "oriental" is a completely bullshit word, though my Asian wife reports that she doesn't exactly feel insulted when she hears it used: just thinks it's loudly Eurocentric)

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:22 (twenty-two years ago)

actually people from india prefer to be called by their given names, just like most people.....
Well, when you need to explain WHY she's taking classes...
The fragment of the conversation went something like this:

Me: Priya changed her sked (schedule) so she could add more classes to her daytime.
Ryan: What classes?
Me: History...English. (sips coffee)
Lydia: English?
Ryan: ESL? (English as a second Language)
Me: Naw. More advanced. She speaks very eloquently.
Lydia: "Priya?" What nationality is that?
Me: She's an Indian.
(cue nosy PC lady)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:22 (twenty-two years ago)

I love all of you

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:23 (twenty-two years ago)

custos was that dennys in alabama by any chance?
Monterey, California.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Lydia: "Priya?" What nationality is that?
Me: She's an Indian.
(cue nosy PC lady)

CUSTOS IN PROVING TRIFE'S POINT SHOCKAH!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:25 (twenty-two years ago)

'she speaks very eloquently)'

trife (simon_tr), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I love all of you
We love you too, oops. (Deeply and Carnally...)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:26 (twenty-two years ago)

CUSTOS IN PROVING TRIFE'S POINT SHOCKAH!
Huh? How does that prove anything?

'she speaks very eloquently'
She did, though.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:27 (twenty-two years ago)

(there are, of course, several other possibilties in between)

Like Spaceships! And 50s Diners! And clubs! And dentist's offices! (oh wait that last one is sum 41)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:28 (twenty-two years ago)

i really have to reevaluate the turnaround my life has taken in the last month to be back "arguing" with people called "oops" and "lord custos spsilon"

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Hahahahahaha.
anyhow...jess, you never answered my question from way upthread.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:29 (twenty-two years ago)

One of my favorite quotes ever:

"A curmudgeon's reputation for malevolence is undeserved. They're neither warped nor evil at heart. They don't hate mankind, just mankind's excesses. They're just as sensitive and soft-hearted as the next guy, but they hide their vulnerability beneath a crust of misanthropy." -- Jon Winokur

I actually believe this about everybody on this thread and the other one who this could apply to, because otherwise I wouldn't bother reading or posting here. But my god you can all make it hard to remember that sometimes, and sometimes the constant inability to even slightly drop the pose gets more tiring than even you're willing to acknowledge -- and I know some of you have.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I forgot beaches and churches and yachts and barbeques and spaceSTATIONS.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:32 (twenty-two years ago)

jess, you can call me Andy if you'd like. anyway, a rose by any other...

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I believe Ned (and Winokur) are right.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:33 (twenty-two years ago)

don't get me wrong, it's not like i go posting under my real name either

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Just don't e-mail him, bitch.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:34 (twenty-two years ago)

(sean combs.)

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:34 (twenty-two years ago)

thanks Ned

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:35 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah but Ned you knew what this thread was gonna be like when you saw the subject line, c'mon

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Wait, is jess' "new persona" Dee?!

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:41 (twenty-two years ago)

To be honest, J0hn, I thought based on the subject line that YOU had started it. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:42 (twenty-two years ago)

also suburban streetcorners in the middle of prefab houses like Nelly and Kelly's "dilemma"

god that was a great video.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:45 (twenty-two years ago)

rappers should film videos on ilm!!

trife (simon_tr), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:48 (twenty-two years ago)

it'd be like subterranean homesick blues but without dylan

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:50 (twenty-two years ago)

(potentially an improvement)

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:50 (twenty-two years ago)

diamond see two posts above yrs for my secret identity

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:52 (twenty-two years ago)

naw Ned that was the me of like two weeks ago, I'm better now

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:52 (twenty-two years ago)

potentially

'Definitely,' you meant to say.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:53 (twenty-two years ago)

hmmm

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 02:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey james, how ya doin

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 03:11 (twenty-two years ago)

pass the pretzels

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 03:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm alright, I had the second best turkey sandwich of my life tonight

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 03:14 (twenty-two years ago)

custos, ignore trife. he's an immature little snot without a single genuine thought rattling around inside his head. if you add in his own hyprocisy, what a fine young nine year he is! knee jerk contrarianism is never a substitute for actual thinking.

jess, leave custos alone. what are you? the ilm bully? you may disagree with custos, but at least he has definable tastes and his own sense of humor. keep in my he also has a sense humor that isn't based on being cruel to others as yours seems to be. i thought name calling was passé once one supposedly became an "adult." together, you and trife represent the absolute worse of ilm. at least trife has the excuse of being prepubscent.

general zod, Tuesday, 10 June 2003 03:20 (twenty-two years ago)

jess is responsible for a lot of fine opinions when he isn't making personal attacks

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 03:23 (twenty-two years ago)

and when he is!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 03:25 (twenty-two years ago)

trife himself also has some neat things to say here and there, and his mixtapes are lauded by many.

The problem as Ned points out upthread is that this kind of shit, which I inadvertently started, brings out the worst in everyone. At this point it doesn't matter what side you're on anymore whether you're an asshole or not.

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 03:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Is "general zod" actually trife pulling a Marcello?!

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 03:27 (twenty-two years ago)

i would be bewildered and impressed if that was the case

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 03:28 (twenty-two years ago)

(I think yes)

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 03:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I suspect it doesn't matter

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 03:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I didn't realise easily definable tastes was what we should all be aspiring for.

I'm sure you're aware that your entire post basically consisted of name-calling, so I won't point out the irony to you.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 03:29 (twenty-two years ago)

[no diamond he isn't -- mod]

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 03:30 (twenty-two years ago)

my lack of definable tastes will always get me in the end

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 03:32 (twenty-two years ago)

guys. can't. you. see. this. MOTHERFUCKING. hostility. is. tearing. us. apart.

King Kobra (King Kobra), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 04:21 (twenty-two years ago)

MOTHERFUCKING,
MOTHERFUCKING hostility will tear us AAA PAAART,
AAA GAAIIIN.

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 04:29 (twenty-two years ago)

won't somebody please think of the children?

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 04:42 (twenty-two years ago)

try and stop me

M Jackson (Oops), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 04:52 (twenty-two years ago)

do americans lose their sanity when UK-ILMORS are sleeping?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 10:35 (twenty-two years ago)

oh I just looked at the big brother threads on ILE.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 10:41 (twenty-two years ago)

http://seaburn.com/blackbooksplus/stupid%20white%20men_small.jpg

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 10:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Waitwaitwait... A logistical beatdown????

"Okay, we'll need two guys to grab his arms and a girl to pull his head back by the hair. We want to get this done by 11:30 AM, so make sure you're prompt. I'm passing out bus schedules; the heavies can take the 10:45 and the girl can be on the 11:00. Things should go down in front of the elementary school for maximum embarassment; it will also be a good venue if we go for the pantsing option. We will reconvene at 12:45 outside of the mall to go for a celebratory Orange Julius."

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 12:40 (twenty-two years ago)

in the uk "logistical" means you are a trucker

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 12:41 (twenty-two years ago)

The UPS could make so much more money if you could send them off in their little shorts uniforms to beat people. Like the mafia only more efficient and stylish.

Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 12:50 (twenty-two years ago)

The problem as Ned points out upthread is that this kind of shit, which I inadvertently started, brings out the worst in everyone. At this point it doesn't matter what side you're on anymore whether you're an asshole or not.
I'd just like to publicly apologize to the ILM forum for any inadvertant chaos I've inflicted. Normally trife's antics don't bother me, but for some inexplicable reason, I lost my cool last night and had to vent.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 13:14 (twenty-two years ago)

(Random note to Custos: probably your Dennys problem was that you said "she's AN Indian," which sounds a lot more like little kids playing wild-west than the usual "she's Indian." The woman wouldn't have blinked at the latter, I don't guess. Priya doesn't need an article.)

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 16:42 (twenty-two years ago)

(And also actually yeah, "Oriental" has a lot of off-base etymological and historical baggage, which is why people have agreed to very sensibly refer to people from Asian as "Asian." Of course Asia is, like, huge, so there are still some kinks to work out with this: for the time being you can assume in most contexts that "Asian" means "east or southeast Asian," and that in all other cases people will specify "Indian" or "Persian" or whatever else.)

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 16:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah...now that I think about it...if I had said "She's from India" (or even better "English wasn't her first language") it probably wouldn't have attracted that ladies attention.
Well...we all speak in "first draft" and once said, it cannot be unsaid.

(And also actually yeah, "Oriental" has a lot of off-base etymological and historical baggage, which is why people have agreed to very sensibly refer to people from Asian as "Asian."
Hmmmm. True. (Well, this also was back in 80s, before PC got serious. African Americans were still called "Black" back then, and Follically Challenged people were still called "Bald Muthaf*ckers")
I do find it interesting that there isn't a PC euphemism for "white"
(unless the politcally correct terminology is "opressor")

Of course Asia is, like, huge, so there are still some kinks to work out with this: for the time being you can assume in most contexts that "Asian" means "east or southeast Asian," and that in all other cases people will specify "Indian" or "Persian" or whatever else.)
Persians are middle eastern. Actually, Persia doesn't exist anymore. "Persians" are Iranian or Iraqi (or Kurd, Marsh Arab, etc.)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 16:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I do find it interesting that there isn't a PC euphemism for "white"

honkey.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 17:07 (twenty-two years ago)

this thread is getting a little too "'edgy' evening at the improv" for me

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 17:16 (twenty-two years ago)

and you don't like that?! ;-)

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 17:20 (twenty-two years ago)

peanut gallery
n.

1. The hindmost or uppermost section of seating in a theater balcony, where the seats are cheapest.
2. A group of people whose opinions are considered unimportant: “Pressure is building... to force... Alan Greenspan to cut interest rates and pump up the money supply. [He] has politely ignored these catcalls from the peanut gallery” (H. Erich Heinemann).

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 17:32 (twenty-two years ago)

women be shopping!

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 17:55 (twenty-two years ago)

yes, thank you dave chapelle.

Kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 18:14 (twenty-two years ago)

...and Alan Greenspan responded to the public by 'Flipping them the Bird' and saying "You didn't elect me, so you can't vote me out...you sorry, weak-ass, muthafuckin peasants!"; The rest of the press conference is unfit for broadcast in Prime Time.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey, so since I'm sorta new here and everything, is Trife actually Ethan P?

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)

what I wanna know is: is "xx" actually trife?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:21 (twenty-two years ago)

xx is the xxx prequel

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:25 (twenty-two years ago)

To Jaymc: yes.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Ha, that's funny, I actually defended his Eminem Show review in the Pitchfork mailbag.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, Custos, I am actually -- amazingly -- aware that there's no longer a political entity known as "Persia," but you'll find that it's in not exactly uncommon as an self-identifier (cf U of M's Persian Students Associations) for Farsis and some other groups. You'll also note that the "Middle East" you're putting them in would require some serious geological magic tracks to make not a part of Asia, which brings us back to my whole point about them being from Asia and therefore technically Asian, though the common compromise around "Asian" is something like "probably meaning east or southeast Asian because otherwise it'd be specified").

The most important point, however: "She's AN Indian" does not make people think of people from India.

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)

The most important point, however: "She's AN Indian" does not make people think of people from India.
Well, Blame Christopher Columbus. Him and his incompetent navigator and arrogant chroniclers made the original mistake. Hence why the phrase "Native American". It's one of the few PC terms I actually use with pride...because it actually is close to the truth. (They ARE more native than whitey.)

...but you'll find that it's in not exactly uncommon as an self-identifier (cf U of M's Persian Students Associations) for Farsis and some other groups.
Hmmm. Didn't know about that. But it's good to learn something new every day.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:43 (twenty-two years ago)

easy rule - anybody whose name you can't pronounce first try is a 'heathen'

dave q, Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:45 (twenty-two years ago)

nabisco in speaking for everyone ever shocker!

(actually I am shocked. I've heard the "She's AN Indian" phrase and thought that person in question is indeed from India. Funny how this world works with lots of people and diversity of opinions and how to express them, etc., etc.)

hstencil, Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:46 (twenty-two years ago)

"blame christopher columbus"

*shoots self*

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:49 (twenty-two years ago)

*sob* Another fun pop-punk band lost to race war...

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:51 (twenty-two years ago)

dave q: easy rule - anybody whose name you can't pronounce first try is a 'heathen'
Ouch.

hstencil: (actually I am shocked. I've heard the "She's AN Indian" phrase and thought that person in question is indeed from India. Funny how this world works with lots of people and diversity of opinions and how to express them, etc., etc.)
Okay, quick quiz:
How many (when you first read that "She's an Indian" phrase) thought I meant "Indian from India" and how many thought I meant "Indian from a reservation."?
My theory is that ILM's American Contingent would've thought "reservation" while ILM's Brit Contingent would've thought "India."
Is this theory close to the truth?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:51 (twenty-two years ago)

no

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, okay then. But still...just out of curiousity...
How many thought "Indian from India" / "Indian from a reservation"?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:55 (twenty-two years ago)

"Indian from India" / "Indian from a reservation" = sexy Indian lez-up

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:56 (twenty-two years ago)

in the uk, we'd say "she's indian" if we meant "she's from india"

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:57 (twenty-two years ago)

i wasn't there, bro

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought Indian from India. I've heard it expressed either way ("She's Indian" or "She's an Indian"). No one I know calls Native Americans anything except Native Americans.

hstencil, Tuesday, 10 June 2003 19:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Welll, I don't know about that.
All the "Native Americans" I've ever met (3 of them) preferred being known by their nation and which people "they are for"
But I've always felt like a heel if I was cornered into needing to ask for this data.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry if I see it sort of slanted, Stencil, but my personal experience is that people don't tend to put articles in front of ethnicities -- she's Swedish, he's Russian, he's German, she's Colombian -- unless something comes after, like "he's a Japanese laywer" or "she's an Indonesian musician." Whereas the old use of "Indian" usually did get an article. I just saw Custos' story and it seemed to me that that might have explained the issue (though it doesn't explain the woman).

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:06 (twenty-two years ago)

She's Australian vs She's an Australian

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:07 (twenty-two years ago)

or "she's from Australia."

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:09 (twenty-two years ago)

(Sorry, I'm keeping this up cause I like the thought of Ethan scrolling through and being all "Jesus, these corny fucks are talking about India on this thread?")

Now: how best to refer to people from Indiana?

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Cornhuskers.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, i'm sorry. Thats insensitive.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Hoosiers or Boilermakers

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Squares
Fly-overs
Farmer Teds

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:11 (twenty-two years ago)

No Custos that's Nebraskans. People from Indiana are Hoosiers.

she's a Swede, he's a Russian, he's a Kraut, she's Colombian...

hstencil, Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Republicans

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:12 (twenty-two years ago)

...so lets call the whole thing off.
Anybody wanna join me in a rendition of "It's a Small World After All"?
(xpost)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:13 (twenty-two years ago)

mr Diamond has a point.
It has been said that no Republican ever won the presidency who didn't win Indiana.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:14 (twenty-two years ago)

i say "Indian" or "American Indian" actually

or the name of the tribe

of course very few of us are faced with this choice, since the U.S. government obliterated almost every trace of their people and culture from an entire continent in only 100 short years or so, a karmic stain on our nation that may never quite come out in the wash. it ranks up there with the most tragic events in all of human history. "Native American" just sounds like such generalized post-facto whitewash ignorance, at least "Indian" has some kind of historical resonance, which is why some tribes prefer it as a lesser of two evils: the word like a transcription of white ignorance trapped in amber, "cowboys and indians," scalps and pawnees and custer and the rest, and they don't want anyone to forget that stuff, least of all themselves

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:14 (twenty-two years ago)

"Native American" just sounds like such generalized post-facto whitewash ignorance, at least "Indian" has some kind of historical resonance,
Well, I suspect that referring to someone by their whole of/for construction would be the best.
(as in..."I am of the Pima, and for the Pueblo Nation") or somesuch.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:16 (twenty-two years ago)

I lived above an elderly Choctaw couple in Chicago, and I just called 'em by their first names, uh yeah.

Perhaps we should just call 'em injuns? But only when they're drunk?

hstencil, Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:17 (twenty-two years ago)

side note: Do we have ANY "Native Americans" on the forum that can explain how the of/for system works?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:17 (twenty-two years ago)

I say American Indian too, but I also say "He's a Russian".

Whoa, Tracer, that's like the deepest thing you've ever said, where did that come from?

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Perhaps we should just call 'em injuns? But only when they're drunk?
depends on if their a *mean* drunk or not.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:18 (twenty-two years ago)

I just call 'em 'red storm'

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Now in the 40oz PAR-TAY PACK!

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:19 (twenty-two years ago)

I majored in Anthropology in college, and many of the profs would use the term "Indian", which initially took me aback but it was likely employed for reasons along the lines of what Tracer said.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:20 (twenty-two years ago)

In speaking to the white man, it made sense to use the white man's term. No doubt Columbo's awful sleuthing rankled, but after a few generations of being "Indian" it was a word to be proud of. Why not? "Native American" is still a white fucking word, I don't see how it's any better really! Plus it goes against the whole supposed ethos of America, that anybody can be a "native" American if you hang around long enough. Although given the subject of this conversation this "ethos" just sounds like a justification for genocide. The whole subject makes me sick frankly.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)

it goes against the whole supposed ethos of America, that anybody can be a "native" American if you hang around long enough.

Maybe that's the reason to use it! Fuck, if the ethos of America is to completely forget history entirely, I'm not sure why it would be preferable NOT to go against that.

hstencil, Tuesday, 10 June 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

anybody can be a "native" American if you hang around long enough = why are black people so "angry?"

hstencil, Tuesday, 10 June 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Tracer is OTM.

"Indian" is often preferred, especially among the young. It's an appropriation from Europeans of a formerly (mildly) offensive word (young urban blacks in the US have been doing something similar, of course).

"Native American" only makes sense if you mean North American, but then it becomes confusing when indigenous Mexicans are thrown into the mix (Mestizos, etc). And up here, you rarely if ever hear "Native Canadian". The politically correct term (other than "Native"), which many Native elders seem to prefer is "First Nations people" or just "First Nations". My old partner (who is Ojibway-Cree) when I worked with, um, Native street kids, simply used the word "aboriginal".

As a cauc, I got away with using "Indian" only once the kids trusted me. Yet they were generally contemptuous of politically correct white adults who used more liberal-sounding terms.

Anyway, this doesn't even begin to do justice to something that's very complicated.

But Tracer's feelings on this I cocur with wholeheartedly (while acknowledging the history in Canada is somewhat different, yet still appalling).

David A. (Davant), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 23:36 (twenty-two years ago)

cocur = concur

David A. (Davant), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)

custos this was handily the most inept 'beatdown' i've ever seen attempted and we are all dumber for having read it

mark p (Mark P), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 01:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Not me. I now know all about 'indian' word. I'll be in in Sainsbury's brainy as fuck tomorrow. I'll get new food even.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 01:42 (twenty-two years ago)

David. Canada is more appalling only in the sense that there's enough native americans in enough places with enough good stuff on/under them that there's more ugliness *still going on* than in the u.s.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 01:44 (twenty-two years ago)

True dat.

Oh, and don't forget the residential schools.

(Did they have those -- or equivalents -- south of the line?)

David A. (Davant), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 01:51 (twenty-two years ago)

oh hell yeah. on an even bigger scale as i recall (= more effective in reducing the native "problem" today).

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 01:57 (twenty-two years ago)

if someone said "she's an indian" it wouldn't even occur to me for a second that "she" was from anywhere other than the country india

i live in ireland though

robin (robin), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 01:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I straddle the fence on this. I used to live in England, and if I'd heard the phrase "she's an Indian", I'd a thought immediately "she's from India". I think I used to assume that the kinds of "Indians" who were in all those dusty Western movies were all gone, which isn't too far from the truth.

Now, as a Canadian, I would think Native "Indian". Someone from India would either be described in a racist way (Paki or Hindu -- yeah, I know) or as "Indo-Canadian."

And that's too bad, Sterling. My history's sketchy, but didn't Sitting Bull come up to Canada to escape the US government or something? Those schools weren't used for physical genocide here as much as cultural genocide. And the effects have passed through the generations today and beyond.

It's fucking sad, actually.

David A. (Davant), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 03:54 (twenty-two years ago)

*sighs*

I would respond with a long diatribe, but seeing as though (a.) yesterday was absolute shit for me and (b.) I don't know how on Earth I could possibly address every single thing I need to address, I don't think I'll go much further than to say:

1. Fucking hell, "Way Back When" was my own little way of saying the bloody 1960s. Sheesh. You would think I'd be talking about pre-Civil War, the way it was waved about.

2. I didn't mean a single damn thing about the "tacky mansion" comment other than the ACTUAL FACT that most current rap videos seem to show a lifestyle more conducive to your everday average drug kingpin, what with the gold-plated everything and blinding decor. I do think there's a happy medium between a rap video that portrays rappers as tasteless hound dogs and a rap video that depicts rappers as po' folk, something many female rappers seem to get (look at any Salt & Pepa or Queen Latifah video, for instance).

3. Why do I suddenly get the feeling that this whole damn thing is the "race card" played to the absolute extreme? Look, if you're a bitter African-American, let me give you the benefit of my life experience by saying that you're going to get absolutely nowhere portraying yourself as a victim. I live my own life conscious of the fact that I DO NOT WANT TO BE DEALT WITH IN ANY WAY AS A VICTIM, no matter what happens to me. A lot of personal shit has happened to me in the past, stuff I don't want to get into in detail, and my biggest lesson has been that the old saying, "Whatever does not kill you makes you stronger" is absolutely spot on. And yes, I do think you have little to complain about as a minority these days. At least you don't have the predicament of getting a tap without a water cooler as the "colored water fountain". At least you don't have to enter through a side or a back entrance to get to a restaurant. At least there's no such thing as the "colored" section of a movie theater. At least there are no governors out there who will call in the National fucking Guard to block your entrance to a public school because he doesn't think you have the "right" to go in. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the others involved in the 20th century civil rights movement have done a hell of a lot for people such as my parents, and it's completely disrespecting their lives' work to even imply that things haven't changed since the dismal 1950s.

Ok, so that was a diatribe. And yes, I am using the "f" word so you know what my mental state's been like the past 24 hours.

4. As someone with a little Native American blood in her (the Hopi tribe), I'd have to say the Native Americans (i.e. the so-called "Indians" who don't come from the big subcontinent made famous by Mahatma Gandhi) are the "Native Americans".

Dee the Lurker (Dee the Lurker), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Geez, Dee, why stop there: Martin Luther King, Jr. had "little to complain about" -- "At least he wasn't a slave!"

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:32 (twenty-two years ago)

why not try responding to dee with a reasoned counter-argument (as she is happy to explain her thoughts at length), instead of just joining the pile-on of ugly remarks & sarcastic comments?

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:34 (twenty-two years ago)

fuck you nabisco, why don't you read what she wrote? Clearly that's not what she was saying.

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Really? Could have fooled me.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:37 (twenty-two years ago)

yes Alex clearly her intention was to deny MLK's good works. Yes you are so right. Sentences like "Martin Luther King, Jr. and the others involved in the 20th century civil rights movement have done a hell of a lot for people such as my parents, and it's completely disrespecting their lives' work to even imply that things haven't changed since the dismal 1950s." must only be read in a sarcastic tone.

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:39 (twenty-two years ago)

it seems like everyone is delighting in quoting little snips of what dee's said out of context & then very nastily dismissing her--do you really think what she's been saying is so horrifically hateful that you can't even bear to engage with it?

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:40 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not saying people don't have the right to complain, I think there's plenty still to complain about (hello I live pretty much in Bed-Stuy only a block's difference and a little sign that sez we're in a "historic district"), but shit she's right on in saying that anybody who thinks there hasn't been ANY progress since the 1950s is full of shit.

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not sure how much more reasoned a couterargument can get -- and Stencil, I'm going to work on the assumption that you're being sarcastic. I have no idea what went on on whatever other thread: what I do see is that Dee has just taken the position that a group of people can't make any legitimate socioeconomic complaints because "at least" they're not as bad as they were before, which is a handy and illogical way of silencing all legitimate complaints, ever. It would be very difficult to find people in the US who don't agree that the civil rights movement made tremendous advances for racial equality, but it's downright silly to pretend that simply because great advances were made, there are no problems remaining to be solved -- exactly as silly as it would have been to try and tell the civil rights leaders of the 60s that they had nothing to complain about and that all their complaints were disrespectful to the great strides that were made with the Emancipation Proclamation.

If there's a need for reasoned argument here, I think it's more incumbent on Dee to move beyond the vague idea that African-Americans "complain" and portray themselves as "victims" and maybe actually address what specific complaints and complainers she thinks are unjustified.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:42 (twenty-two years ago)

s1utsky I pretty much agree with her although I do think people do have plenty of reasons, and rights, to complain. Then again I didn't take her original comment to be that bad anyway (and I'm not sure why anyone else did either) (but then again I call people "Native Americans" so what the fuck do I know?).

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:44 (twenty-two years ago)

well nabisco a paragraph like that is just what I was talking about.

(x-post)

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:45 (twenty-two years ago)

well nabisco if you feel that why, why did you not say so? It would've been far more interesting/effective than just pulling the same ol' ILM sarcasm bullshit (which is really unlike you anyway).

And sorry for over-reacting, I still don't think what Dee posted is nearly as offensive as when I hear white people say shit like "why are blacks so angry?" I think she's definitely more intelligent than that.

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:47 (twenty-two years ago)

and stencil what largely bothered me was the hopped-up aggressiveness of people's reactions (and I'm not singling out nabisco or anything, but rather the general tone of how people have been reacting to what dee's been saying), possibly due to agitation/excitement absorbed from the frenzy over in that other thread. it seemed pretty unfair--especially quoting her like that--as if people were just angry/delighted to see someone perhaps not hip to the latest way of talking about race.

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:49 (twenty-two years ago)

like, "oh here's someone who makes remarks we can probably classify as racist," ATTACK!

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:50 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah except I just now did the opposite with nabisco and Alex.

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:52 (twenty-two years ago)

(shhh)

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Dudes, let's be clear: I did a sarcastic one-liner because it seemed like too obvious a point to merit anything more than that. Apparently it does take more than that, which scares me. And in no way was that meant to imply that there's anything "hateful" about what she wrote, just that it seems a bit wrongheaded to me, as it's exactly the same argument plenty of people greeted the civil rights movement with. She's arbitrarily deciding that with the end of Jim Crow all of the problems of black people in America vanished and they no longer had any legitimate issues to raise.

As for the victimization issue there's certainly a level on which I might even agree with her: there are certain mindsets that I think still lean heavy on the idea of government redress slightly more than it's tenable or would even be productive right now. That said, I'm still uncomfortable with the broad brush she's using to paint all black people with issues to raise as "complainers" with nothing real to "complain" about, as if there's some whiny African-American hive-mind out there that's constantly in her face asking for something.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Everyone here can and will defend themselves on their respective stances as needed (and I think Nabisco has raised extremely cogent and, for my money, impossible to ignore points that square with my own beliefs on the subject). However, this controversy in large part grew out of Trife's extremely idiotic posts yesterday in which he conflated his own take on music in general with a cartoonish vision of racial politics as played out on this board. Any attempts to deal with that seriously -- such as John D's responses, for instance -- were either ignored or laughed off by him and anyone else playing along in the whole damn game, as what happened when Dee first posted yesterday. It brought out the worst in any number of people and I don't think there's any level of serious discussion to be had here unless that's all taken into account. As I said upthread, when snideness, willful stupidity and more stops being a shield or an extremely carefully used weapon and starts being its own raison d'etre, then fuck it -- there's no respect shown, there should be no respect given, ESPECIALLY when all the people involved are capable of so much better, and they know it.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:55 (twenty-two years ago)

we are all brown on the internet

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 04:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Nabisco I really was reacting more to the general tone of things than what you said & I'm sorry if I just cracked at your remark--like I said I didn't mean to single you out. (And for the record, I think you make a very valid point.) My feeling is just that snapping at a comment that you think espouses a particularly wrongheaded or harmful opinion (especially when the snapped-at person has been sort of overloaded with attacks of that nature on that other thread, which perhaps you haven't even read, so what do I know) won't do much to change anyone's mind.

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Damn, I go away for a couple weeks and ILM finally gets tired of snide one-liners! (This makes me happy, actually.) Is this mega-contentious thread something I'd actually want to look at?

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:01 (twenty-two years ago)

if you can't play the game it means you don't understand the rules.

j0hn D did and i at least thort he was playing along.

dee clearly still doesn't.

oops is a slow learner.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Decide for yerself, Nabisco.

Fuck your game, Sterling. Because it isn't funny and neither are you.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:03 (twenty-two years ago)

but nabisco that's of course just my way of dealing with things; it's probably clear from my last couple remarks that I have a "kill 'em with kindness" (which doesn't always work, that's for sure) attitude towards confrontation.

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I agree Ned, BUT let's not say that what Dee wrote (whether you agree with it or not) is even near the level of trife's (god I hate calling him by that stupid name) bullshit trolling action.

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:04 (twenty-two years ago)

ned i dare you to find me something i wrote on that thread that was truly mean and hurtful.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:06 (twenty-two years ago)

I wasn't trying to imply that, Stence, and I'm sorry if it came off that way.

Sterling, you are an intelligent person and that's the main reason why I'm frustrated with you rather than assuming you're some sort of hateful ogre, and if you can't understand the distinction I'm trying to make then I won't bother explaining it again.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:07 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm serious ned. The most hateful thing I said on that whole thread was probably "!!!!!!!".

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:10 (twenty-two years ago)

explain to this slow learner what you meant, sterling

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:11 (twenty-two years ago)

meant by what?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:12 (twenty-two years ago)

me being a slow learner.
i haven't even engaged in this discussion.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:14 (twenty-two years ago)

ffs

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Ned, I didn't take what you wrote that way, I was just saying in general.

I went back and looked at the thread and I can't honestly understand why people got so worked up over Dee's post.

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:16 (twenty-two years ago)

oops this thread is about the discussion on the "punch" thread which you most certainly DID engage in.

"trife, you may have had a point if every person listed here was black. But most of them aren't. Are we to pretend we like all black acts just cuz they're black and we feel guilty from slavery? No one here is 'physically attacking a bunch of black people' or 'physically attacking a bunch of black people who make 'bad' music'. We are simply attacking PEOPLE. The only person here to whom race is a factor is you. "

is one of the more egregious bits of point-missing on that thread (racially problematic != physical attack, for starters) and then followed by asking trife if he's "for real" when he is obv. simultaneously the most and least real thing about ilx.

i mean its like asking if the a car is "for sale": depends on the price.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:21 (twenty-two years ago)

haha

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't believe nabisco - who knows more than anyone how trife threads play out - has gotten snagged in this web!

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:24 (twenty-two years ago)

I fail to see why Trife is somehow a normative figure on a board where multiple points of views come together. There is an implication in your earlier post, Sterling, that there's indeed a game with rules, if you want to extend the metaphor, but if -- if -- there is, why is Trife automatically the dungeonmaster or whatever? Why are you asking everyone to play by his rulebook instead of allowing for a wider range? What is the point otherwise? THAT is what I am annoyed about.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:26 (twenty-two years ago)

sterling, did you even read that whole thread, or did you just pick out the points you could jump on.
BTW, great job of explaining HOW i missed the point. or even what the fucking point was.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:28 (twenty-two years ago)

but carry on belittling others from your Chair of Supreme Wisdom

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:30 (twenty-two years ago)

for the record i've heard "indian" and "an indian" in ref. to both indians (like from the subcontinent) and indians (as in "american indians")...from the mouths of both indians (like from the subcontinent) and nonindians. i actually like the many subtle distinctions in tone (most of them genial enough) that come from the use and nonuse of the article--it can also be a subtle indicator of where the speaker is coming from, linguistically and nationally. i guess, as usual (and unhelpfully), context is all. in an academic environment, where you have people coming from different linguistic and national backgrounds, i don't think it'd be so odd to hear "an indian" (in ref. to someone from the subcontinent... i've certainly heard it before) but i suppose it's possible that using the article in common conversation at a bus stop in everytown, usa might conjure up mental images of comanche and navajo etc. actually the more i think about it, an american like myself saying "she's an indian" (referring to the subcontinent) does sound faintly condescending, as if being indian was the essential characteristic of theoretical girl A, whereas saying "she's indian" doesn't define theoretical girl A by her nationality anymore than saying "she's tall" would define her by her height. actually theoretical girl A is persian, I think, or is that iranian? the iranian-americans i have known have accepted either. but i suspect this is partly because their family's background is pro-shah (or at least anti-revolutionary) ... the name "persia" being tied to imperialism, orientalism, and so on.

that was longwinded and useless but all this fussing and yelling has dispirited me so i thought i'd stem it for a brief moment.

no wait. x-post. sterling says: "he is obv. simultaneously the most and least real thing about ilx."

sterling i think you're overusing "obv." when you apply it to one of your trademark effete contradictions.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Picking on and jumping on points was the whole point of this thing I thought.

That said I don't think anyone here ought to be subjected to "logistical beatdowns," and certainly whole threads shouldn't be started for it. If Dee wants to take it to trife on this thread that's her prerogative I guess, but I was kind of happy that we'd steered clear of that.

What bothers me most about Dee's post is that it puts all rapping on a continuum between "po' folks" and "tasteless hound dogs".

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:31 (twenty-two years ago)

the phrase "logistical beatdown" is a malpropism so semantically rich that i'm disappointed that instead of mining it further à la Dan Perry, we have all chosen to take the piss.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:34 (twenty-two years ago)

malaapropism

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:35 (twenty-two years ago)

actually the more i think about it, an american like myself saying "she's an indian" (referring to the subcontinent) does sound faintly condescending, as if being indian was the essential characteristic of theoretical girl A, whereas saying "she's indian" doesn't define theoretical girl A by her nationality anymore than saying "she's tall" would define her by her height.

this is disingenuous. How is naming a nationality necessarily noting the "essential characteristic" of a person?

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:35 (twenty-two years ago)

mmmm tasty hot dogs

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:35 (twenty-two years ago)

no hstencil i just meant saying "she's an indian" in a certain imagined context (which i'm probably not conveying very well) sort of sounds like, "oh, she does [x] because she's an indian"--like you're ending a conversation rather than making an observation. but the point of my post is that context is all so there is nothing necessary about it.

BTW "mala'apropism" is "malapropism" in Hawaiian.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:37 (twenty-two years ago)

and why do people keep accusing me of disingenuousness lately? do i have a big bob saget smile on my face?

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:37 (twenty-two years ago)

I sure do love music!

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:37 (twenty-two years ago)

< /kettle>

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Wait, isn't Trife's whole deal to rail against the supposed hive mind of ILX?! Dee should be like his favorite poster!

amateurist, I can't believe that you can't be bothered to write with capital letters, yet you put that accent grave on "a la".

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:39 (twenty-two years ago)

haha!

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:41 (twenty-two years ago)

okay oops. one more time. the point was that trife wasn't arguing that the thread was going to round up a lynch mob, but that it was based on a racial double-standard towards black and white musicians. (which it clearly was -- the origins of the double-standard, the reasons it was successful indie-rockers and pretty much every well-known rapper getting called out above all else, etc. are all up for debate. but that those two categories were getting unique attention is not.) you repeatedly refused to see that and engage on that level, and then denied the very notion that "punchable" ppl. are not just an undifferentiated mass but have race and genre characteristics which the boards were reacting too in a particular way.

i.e. "since *I* didn't notice what trife points out then it doesn't exist and if he brings in race he's 'paranoid' (to use custos' phrase)" which is by the way the EXACT logic of the anti-affirmative action neo-con crew.

hence point-missing. and don't call me out on the "read the whole thread" thing coz you don't wanna hear what i have to say about em's "fake b-boy accent". (oh fuck i'll say it anyway -- white boy trying to act black, is he a... c'mon you KNOW you want to say it, a w*gga? yeah those fucking race-traitors acting below their station get yr. blood boiling everytime. and its not even like he HAS a b-boy accent whatever the fuck that means. honestly his flow is the most precise sharp and nasal on modern radio.)

[oh and ned, we each bring our own set of rules to the table but the precondition is that we recognize those of our fellow players -- increasingly foax like trife, youthful dmb fans, etc. are getting written out of the picture in a guise of liberal "normativity"]

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm pretty sure trife doesn't need you coming to bat for him (especially since he's a 50 Cent fan)

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:45 (twenty-two years ago)

My take on your question, Stencil: it looks to me like people (it was only a couple people, wasn't it?) got worked up over Dee's post because they were worked up over defending themselves not only against Trife's ridiculous accusations of racism but against the sub-implication that they have cartoonish square-old-man problems with hip-hop, and because Dee's post in fact did contain the sort of stereotypically square-old-mannish problems with hip-hop that are often read as bigoted or unjustifiably dismissive of black culture. (I don't think those arguments are always necessarily any of those things at all, and don't know Dee well enough to do anything but take her opinion at face value.) Actually, I think Dee had the misfortune of turning into the handy anti-Trife placeholder so that people could say "see, we don't think that, Trife." The whole reason his trolling gets such responses is that he doesn't really take a contrary position to everyone else -- he actively misrepresents what everyone else means, so suddenly everyone needs some other landmarks to try and justify where they actually stand.

As for Trife, I think we can mostly give up on getting back the reasonable Ethan, at least within the confines of ILX: he's been pulling that same troll for a long time, and it needs to be ignored like any other troll. I mean, it's understandable that people are justifiably uncomfortable with being called racists and want to defend themselves against it. But when Trife is saying things like "i cant imagine anyone hating puffy except if because they were racist," it should be clear to pretty much anyone that he's just laughing at you, and there's no gain in trying to discuss intelligently.

Sterling's unfortunately found the easiest way around the Trife scorn, which is half to agree with him and half to pretend that the whole thing's an amusing wind-up meant to draw out people's positions, etc. -- the usual troll excuses. That's sort of disappointing to me, because c'mon: Trife trolls do admittedly turn up a higher-than-average ratio of fascinating reactions than, say, Calum trolls, but fascinating reactions aren't nearly as good in a context where there's no hope of actually discussing them.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:46 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah let's all cry for trife. Boo fucking hoo.

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:46 (twenty-two years ago)

did someone actually accuse eminem of copping a b-boy accent?!!!

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:47 (twenty-two years ago)

haha yeah oops did

nitsuh otm

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:48 (twenty-two years ago)

he's sayign what we're all thinking!!!!1

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:49 (twenty-two years ago)

ok sterling my advice is just to ease up on the "obvs" and similar rhetorical devices. they have the effect of making your debating partners feel like you are insulting them.[/pedantry]


amateurist, I can't believe that you can't be bothered to write with capital letters, yet you put that accent grave on "a la".

the lowercase thing is just a too-cool-for-school affect, like, "hey, this debate looks interesting but i'm not, like, really committed to it, and like, don't attack my points with too much rigor cause i'm, like, just passing through. no time for the caps key." my use of the accent grave betrays is the giveaway, however: it's all a pose.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:52 (twenty-two years ago)

trife's a good kid, but I do find a certain level of, er, fronting in his, er, game ie. you don't see him on the jay-z v. nas threads, you don't see him trying to write for the source, vibe, et. al instead of banging his head against the usual indiecentric sources (pitchfork, an athens, ga alt-weakly). he's like a late model geirbot too often.

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:52 (twenty-two years ago)

that was directed at Sterling, not at you nabisco.

I'm not exactly an old man, and I could give a fuck if I'm square, but I feel exactly the same way about most hip-hop and rap stuff now in almost the same way that Dee did in her post. Believe it or not, there are actually a lot of black people that just might feel the same way. I feel like sometimes ILM is in this weird little bubbleworld where its only the people like Dee who express their opinions - and not the trolls like trife - who bring out the "fascinating reactions."

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:52 (twenty-two years ago)

x-post above. and, why do i have five diff't reo speedwagon songs running through my head in medley fashion?

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:53 (twenty-two years ago)

nabisco you know how in every crime movie there's that one dude who's sort of a psycho and he's always kicking-ass the hardest but you think every now and then that he's gonna kick too hard at the wrong time and blow the operation? but yr. glad he's on yr. side and not the other anyway? (in the movie he usually does, but that's just coz its a movie).

trife is like that guy.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:53 (twenty-two years ago)

that said the level of corny indie fuckdom on ilx lately (did you see all the cat power and malkmus love on the best albums of 2003 list? did you see it on the best singles of 2003 list?) means we might need him more than ever.

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:54 (twenty-two years ago)

haha, x-post with sterling!

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Sterling please come back from weird little fantasy bubbleland some day.

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:55 (twenty-two years ago)

delete "betrays" from my second to last post above.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:55 (twenty-two years ago)

sterl i might have agreed with you there even 6 mos. ago

but not now

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:55 (twenty-two years ago)

sterling have you ever taken an orthodox position on anything? try it sometime.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:56 (twenty-two years ago)

I need to get some sleep, but Sterling, a last post before I do: your stance vis-a-vis Trife, etc. makes no allowance for the fact that 1) apparently they're doing as much of a pisspoor job in recognizing rules as the 'norm' is supposedly doing, if that is the case, and you're not contributing much to changing that if you think that's a problem, and 2) there seems to be this belief you have that all roles are fixed, that Trife can ONLY be Trife, that all DMB fans are apparently 15 year olds who apparently are to be treated as such. Where is the stereotyping there, I have to ask?

I think we can mostly give up on getting back the reasonable Ethan, at least within the confines of ILX

That's for damn sure. And it's a total shame. Unsurprisingly, Nabisco nails Sterling's complicity in all this better than I could (and wisely notes along with Tracer that indeed Dee's arguments need, at the least, some thinking through). Sterling, drop the movie argument. Both you AND Trife can do better, and have done.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Dude if you really think trife is all like Telly Savalas in The Dirty Dozen then I think there's no hope left for anything ever.

*k-blammo*

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:57 (twenty-two years ago)

the point was that trife wasn't arguing that the thread was going to round up a lynch mob, but that it was based on a racial double-standard towards black and white musicians.

Right, he thought we had already formed a virtual one.

which it clearly was

Clearly to who? You, the knower of all?
Sterling, why don't you try asking some questions instead of making assumptions left and right? Oh wait, I know why, cuz you have everything figured out. You KNOW what's going on in my head. You know what I *really* mean when I say I don't like Eminem's manner of speech. See, you didn't even KNOW that I was talking about his speaking voice, so here's a steaming cup of STFU for ya!

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:57 (twenty-two years ago)

is trife mos def in the italian job!!!!

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:58 (twenty-two years ago)

correct answer: no, he's seth green

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 05:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Sterling, what does it say about you that 4 days after the fact, out of the blue, you feel the need to make a post insulting people?

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:00 (twenty-two years ago)

wait, history lesson: so trife used to be like a regular, sensible and intelligent ILM poster who only occasionall trolled as "trife"?

i imagine that scene in x2 where pyro looks longingly at magneto and co. as they are about to jet off.

wait neither of those characters in the italian job fit sterling's description at all.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:01 (twenty-two years ago)

i haven't seen the movie

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:01 (twenty-two years ago)

but thanks for ruining it for me

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:01 (twenty-two years ago)

blount: don't bother. it was mediocre.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:03 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't know why i try any more. i like trife, i consider him a friend, sometimes a provocateur on the boards but NOT a troll and genuinely a nice guy.

i'd like to like amateurist coz we've had some interesting arguments but i've never once seen him THINK about something. (have i ever taken an "orthodox" position? i enjoy screwing missionary style if that's what yr. asking but these days i don't even know what the "orthodox" position is and certainly not from you ams coz you never take any position at ALL).

oops is pretty much evil incarnate in my eyes on every single goddamn thread.

for fucks sake Dee pretty much asserted racial oppression was over with (for "those people" no less -- do you have any IDEA of what that screams), and custos said that looking for racial issues is "paranoid" meanwhile everyone pisses on rap and its okay "because black people do it too" (yeah well not like THAT they don't)

and nobody blinks a fucking eye.

ilx continues to prove to me the inseperability of ideology and aesthetics and has almost just proved to me that i will never have a productive discussion on rap with a republican (and hell most liberals).

and stencil if ILX used to be this bubbleworld which wasn't quite as racially and politically backwards as certain parts of this steaming pile of crap we call "society" then goddamn it so much the better.

you'll note that people barely engage with what i say either. respond, sure, but engage? like oops if i didn't read yr. mind then what the fuck DID you mean when you talked about eminem's punchable b-boy accent?

and Dee if you didn't mean to say that racial oppression ended with the civil rights movement then what DID you mean?

everyone on this thread state yr. stance on affirmative action racial profiling oj simpson the la riots and whether The Boondocks are funny NOW. also the war on drugs and welfare reform.

then we'll see who's a goddamn racist or not.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:14 (twenty-two years ago)

whatta poseur!

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Dude, chill the fuck out

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:18 (twenty-two years ago)

zing?

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:18 (twenty-two years ago)

double zing (alas!)

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:18 (twenty-two years ago)

oops what the fuck were you talking about with this eminem cops a b-boy accent stuff?

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, Stencil, loads of people share Dee's opinion, black, white, and neither, and most of the time I don't think it's any different than someone just not-getting or not-getting-into the culture surrounding country music or punk or whatever else. It sometimes comes packaged with (1) a condescending tone that's sort of unpleasant and tends to get directed only at hip-hop, and (2) a weird mental connection with All Black People Ever that's even worse. So Trife's troll is to accuse everyone of possessing (1) and (2) even when there's not yet evidence to suggest that that's the case.

And Sterling: Trife could have been that guy, at some point, but he's not. He's just winding people up by calling them racists and then laughing at the way they scramble to defend themselves.

And Amateurist: yes, Trife is Ethan P. If you look through the archives here you'll be shocked to learn that he used to be all sweet and cuddly and polite about things. He slowly developed a provocateur schtick that was actually useful and interesting for a while. Around the height of it he even wrote some hip-hop reviews for Pitchfork, at which point the schtick was coming a little heavy but was still interesting; then he started writing for a blog that was pretty great and non-schticky. And then, it seems, the schtick swallowed him alive -- which is too bad, cause he's fierce and clever and a nice guy when he's being himself.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:20 (twenty-two years ago)

mind then what the fuck DID you mean when you talked about eminem's punchable b-boy accent?

Um, I meant it aggravated me. Do you like the way Gilbert Godfrey talks? If so, do you hate Asians? There was no sinister ulterior reasoning. But overanalytical reactionaries like Sterling try to attach DEEP meanings to everything. Toodles!

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:21 (twenty-two years ago)

affirmative action = good
racial profiling = bad
OJ = guilty as sin. should fry.
La Riots = themselves justified and a watershed event, though attacking that white trucker dude is one of the most reprehensible acts ever committed by any human beings ever
Boondocks = always funny, but then I grew up in small town America

Anyway, my main problem with Trife, whose presence I generally enjoy, is that he's become one dimensional - always rehashing a pose I read in William Upski Wimsatt years ago.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:22 (twenty-two years ago)

he's inadvertantly prone to rockism at times also.

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:22 (twenty-two years ago)

oops which b-boy's accent was eminem copping?

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:23 (twenty-two years ago)

also where are these DEEP meanings Sterling has apparently discovered? is it the movie thing cuz that didn't seem that deep really

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:24 (twenty-two years ago)

if you read that thread again, you'll see that i say something like 'maybe it's not fake, but it's annoying in any case'

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:26 (twenty-two years ago)

but how is it a b-boy accent?!!!

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean that's like me saying 'why does Gilbert Gottfried always talk like he's Chinese?'

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:28 (twenty-two years ago)

but yes, I think Em's a whigger, I hate Puffy cuz he's a successful black man, I think black people bitch too much, I am a slow learner, I just recently was able to tie my shoes by myself, I think ILM is a worthwhile place to be, I love people who's sole purpose in posting is to point out the shortcomings and perceived misdoings of others.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:28 (twenty-two years ago)

spoken like one of sterling mythical 15 yr old dmb fans!

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:29 (twenty-two years ago)

You win James! Here's a big shiny quarter!

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:30 (twenty-two years ago)

X2 was not mediocre. and if trife is pyro, then who is magneto?!

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:30 (twenty-two years ago)

if I win how about just explaining what you meant?

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:34 (twenty-two years ago)

and speaking of bubbleworlds the world's biggest is the consciousness of mainstream white america.

that's it for tonight. its late i'm tired and i'm done for now.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:35 (twenty-two years ago)

sterling how could we have had interesting arguments if i wasn't thinking or didn't take a position??


i don't really know you, sterling--which seems to be your desire. so i can't pretend that the impressions i get from your posts are anything more than that, impressions. but one such impression is that you prize contentiousness above other things. some of your posts seem to me to bear traces of sophistry, i.e. taking an unorthodox position* (or stating a more temperate opinion in an intemperate manner) for its own sake. not that you don't seem to have many heartfelt opinions, of course, often if not always well-expressed.

i'd be more patient with your posts if they evidenced some humility. i mean (having met you, or at last some version of you...albeit briefly) i can imagine a certain degree of humility there but the actual prose style you employ removes all overt traces of it.

*orthodox positon = "i think [x] is great for the reasons most people say it's great" (or some similar formulation).


jordan: no no, x2 was good. it was "the italian job:" that was mediocre!

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:36 (twenty-two years ago)

quoth the faux revolutionary

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:36 (twenty-two years ago)

blount now you're just being mean.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:38 (twenty-two years ago)

"and speaking of bubbleworlds the world's biggest is the consciousness of mainstream white america."

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:39 (twenty-two years ago)

why do you want to know? what's the big friggin deal? i don't like how he talks. END OF STORY

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:39 (twenty-two years ago)

sterling the big bad revolutionary, takin it to the streets, give him a casio and a sense of style and he'd be momus

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:40 (twenty-two years ago)

I want to know cuz when someone says something and I don't understand what they said, clarification isn't usually seen as that big of a task. sorry your highness if 'come again?' was an insulting propostion.

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:41 (twenty-two years ago)

ok put another way, here's my rebuttal: there are things to do in conversation (or "conversation") aside from taking a position. you can convey an impression, for example.

i do have a great reluctance sometimes to take unpopular opinions, because i'm not confident i'll have the skillz (or the time, really, since i mostly book between tasks at work) to back them up. i'll own up to that.

i'm sad that this thread is now just james and oops taking the piss. not that i've been at my best here, or that my best is anything to write home about besides.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:46 (twenty-two years ago)

fair enough: I think if you met the 18 year old Marshall Mathers he would sound nothing like what he does now. He comes across as phony to me. And no, it's not cuz he's white--there are many many black people, Asian people, etc. who I can see consciously speaking in a 'street' style.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Oops, have you ever spent time in suburban - that is to say poor suburban - Detroit? I'm talking Wayne, River Rouge, Livonia. Eminem is as "real" as it gets.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:53 (twenty-two years ago)

No, but i've heard interviews with people who knew him back then.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Besides--and i'll say this for like the 3rd time--it doesn't matter to me whether it actually is contrived or not, it SEEMS phony to me.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 06:58 (twenty-two years ago)

WHAT seems phony? cuz I thought you were just saying 'his voice is annoying' but now you're implying something else. is it not his real voice a la milli vanilli or is it not his real voice a la anna paquin in the first x-men movie?

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:04 (twenty-two years ago)

sorry for what I said about amateurist being disingenuous when obviously Blount takes the prize tonight.

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:06 (twenty-two years ago)

i can't explain it to you with using speech (arrested development to thread). sorry.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:06 (twenty-two years ago)

wait, why were you grilling me if you were under the impression i 'just thought his voice was annoying'? i said that to you a bunch of times and you weren't satisfied. pin whatever you want on me. i really don't give a flying fig at this point.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not being disingenous cuz oops has stated loudly that when he said eminem was affecting a b-boy voice he didn't mean 'eminem's trying to sound black' then what did he mean? I don't hear anything 'affected' about eminem's voice? am I missing something? is it disingenous to ask 'what do you mean' since you've denied any meanings ascribed to it so far?

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:18 (twenty-two years ago)

I think he's explained his disdain for it plenty of times and you're just being disingenuous by saying that you don't understand. If you truly don't understand his peeve at this point, well then I don't know what to tell you.

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:20 (twenty-two years ago)

tell me what his peeve is with it for starters. is it just 'he sounds annoying'? cuz when you ask him he says 'where'd I say that?' and if you ask him something else he says 'look, I think he sounds annoying, case closed'.

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:22 (twenty-two years ago)

ie. the way eminem raps and the way eminem talks - I think he actually talks/raps like that

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Third fucking post of the thread, James:

Eminem, no doubt. He's so full of himself it's sickening. And that fake b-boy accent drives me crazy.
-- oops (don'temailmebitc...), June 7th, 2003.

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:26 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't hear anything 'affected' about eminem's voice?

Well I do. You don't, I do. James, you know those rap-metal bands that throw a rap verse in the middle of the song? and they sound like they're forcing their hardness? that's how Em comes across to me. It's like I can see the 'real' Em behind the facade. (i'm not claiming I have superior judgement to you or anyone else, it's just a feeling I get)

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:27 (twenty-two years ago)

finally! fair enough

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Eminem's a fucking mockney, don't you know?

Jeez, people, this is kind of freaky reading.

Really.

David A. (Davant), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:29 (twenty-two years ago)

for good measure: white rapper who doesn't sound like he's 'faking' 'it': Everlast (even tho he may be!)

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:31 (twenty-two years ago)

see when I hear eminem I either hear someone making fun of someone or someone pissed off someone made fun of him. I don't really hear any hardness, though I know I'm possibly in the minority here. I know that when I read Daniel Day-Lewis listened to Eminem to get into character cuz Eminem's music was 'filled with rage' I wondered what he was hearing in 'the real slim shady' I wasn't hearing.

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I saw Daniel Day-Lewis walking down Houston the other night all blinged out. Now that was fucking weird!

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:42 (twenty-two years ago)

next time he's talking (not rapping), watch how his mouth move. that's the root of my annoyance.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:45 (twenty-two years ago)

oops is pretty much evil incarnate in my eyes on every single goddamn thread.

Cool! I love you too, bro

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:06 (twenty-two years ago)

i think trife is pretty much on point with american and british music a lot of the time, but i think there is a certain inability to get european (specifically, german and dutch music). like with those cds i did, he was into the breakbeatravehardcore stuff, and, interestingly some of the post98 frenchdiscohouse, but didnt really seem to connect with either the frankfurt/nyc/koln acid stuff, or anything electroclash themed, music which is either euro, or pseudo-euro.

in a way, this actually reminds me of reynolds more than anything else, music where there is a frisson, a clash of some sorts, which hip hop certainly provides, and rave and early jungle also provided, roots/phuture, masculine/feminine pressure, and arguably french-house provides a similar dichotomy but with much smoother edges, whereas acid/techno seems to be more detached, sublimation to the machine etc, and electroclash is different again in that the clash is a chimera, sonically, a cartoon of a make believe berlin?

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 09:14 (twenty-two years ago)

when anyone sneers at "the ilx hivemind" (or equiv) they are totally asking for trouble

anyone who thinks trife wasn't making a serious point on that thread (and somewhat slightly correctly, absent the totality of the generalisation, about the racial double standard), and was just being geirish, is being a bit complacent i think: probably the way he made the point ended up distracting from it (trife very rarely does nabisco-style paragraphs, which is a pity actually cz when he does this he does this REAL well), but sterling's right, i think, that the liberalish haven here does sometimes function more a haven of etiquette than of actual thinking (the downside is of course that without the etiquette, the community would collapse altogether — it isn't accident that PC sprang up in academic communities, where very wide gulfs of ideology have to sit at the same table and pass the salt w/o glassing one another...) (of course the academic world is no longer a haven of thinking in any real sense heh...)

ned for example is blazingly angry i assume bcz trife was rude to his friend dee: well he WAS very rude to dee... but he was also right, that the generalisation dee was making about rap now — "but it's all just videos about this" — is NOT one which shd be allowed to go pass unchallenged

i like that right-wing and centre-right posters are comfortable to dissent here, and i get annoyed when they get mobbed by a kind of centre-lib conformism (even when i REALLY disagree with what they say) — well, this is the same in the reverse direction, a *lot* of projecting was going on on that thread, bcz trife raised (from the left) a taboo topic in a taboo way and then stuck to his guns (maybe this is the aged ultra-left infantile punk rocker in me admiring ppl who stick by their guns come what may) (geir isn't a troll either) (seems to me also trife is also here celebrating-by-enacting one of the aspects of the rap aesthetic there which kind of gets admired in the breach, to put it mildly, when "white" critical norms kick in...) (ie fronting) (hurrah for it)

the argt between him and john d is really instructive on BOTH sides, content-wise, once you realise they are actually both debating seriously, with content

when i put a snarky one-line post up not so long ago abt courtney love being a magnet for misogynists, i attracted a pretty similar self-righteous hostility, from love-haters angrily insisting they were not misogynists: and it's true, some of them certainly aren't => but i still think mention of her brings misogyny buzzing out of the woodwork, and it thinks it's "allowed" bcz she's manifestly an awful person

it is dumb to say ALL PUFF DADDY HATE IS RACIST DO YOU SEE? but it's nevertheless the case that puff daddy hate and its equiv really is sometimes a mask for the crappiest kind of middleclass assumptions about "what black americans ought to be doing, feeling, saying", the quasi-politicised compromises with the system which are acceptable/admirable by these assumptions (the boo word for these is "indie", possibly) vs the quasi-politicised exploitations of the system which aren't (eg IS IT AN ACCIDENT that the admirable/non-admirable dividing line arrives, to be sub-trifeanishly extreme for a moment, falling surpise surprise BETWEEN activities comfortably-off white foax can devote themselves to doing after college and activities poor black and white folks have the option for, if they want to get to a point where at least they're not poor... ?)

(it's a lot more complicated obv: farrakhan eg is a tireless advocate of the black indie ethic)

(awful warning to all: do NOT earnestly post to ilm while eating bread and honey => i am a twat, excuse me while i hunt out a damp cloth)

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:41 (twenty-two years ago)

it is dumb to say ALL PUFF DADDY HATE IS RACIST DO YOU SEE? but it's nevertheless the case that puff daddy hate and its equiv really is sometimes a mask for the crappiest kind of middleclass assumptions about "what black americans ought to be doing, feeling, saying"

Mark, disliking ANYTHING can be seen as a mask for the crappiest kind of middle-class assumptions about "what black Americans ought to be doing, feeling, saying". It isn't a constructive, instructive, insightful or interesting thing to say, particularly the way Ethan said it.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:53 (twenty-two years ago)

erm plz strike when i said "self righteous" in the post above, i'm not entitled to be calling other ppl on behaviour than copping attitude at them for disagreeing with me

"activities poor black and white folks have the option for" = "activities poor black and white folks have nothing but the option for"

i am arm-deep in bee-juice here, gimme a break

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:56 (twenty-two years ago)

''bcz trife raised (from the left) a taboo topic in a taboo way and then stuck to his guns (maybe this is the aged ultra-left infantile punk rocker in me admiring ppl who stick by their guns come what may)''

I liked this bcz millar's thread was really silly shit and I have to say I enjoyed it when he wanted his own thread to be locked.

The debate between darnielle and ethan was pretty good, esp the bits where they debated whether puffy was doing sampling.

But if he pulled this stuff on a more 'serious' thread it wouldn't be so good.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:01 (twenty-two years ago)

i am arm-deep in bee-juice here, gimme a break

The hive's revenge!

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:03 (twenty-two years ago)

yes good point julio

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Wow. And here I was thinking "Oh, that thread would've died out and dropped below the event horizon by tomorrow morning."
Daaaaaaammmmn.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Dee wrote: I do think there's a happy medium between a rap video that portrays rappers as tasteless hound dogs and a rap video that depicts rappers as po' folk, something many female rappers seem to get (look at any Salt & Pepa or Queen Latifah video, for instance).

Tracer wrote: What bothers me most about Dee's post is that it puts all rapping on a continuum between "po' folks" and "tasteless hound dogs".

If anything I think this shows that possibly the worst thing Dee is guilty of is some very naive phrasing on a sensitive subject on a number of occasions which happen to dovetail with phrasing used in a condescending/outright offensive way by right-wing racists, which is then jumped on by others shoehorning quasi-racist intentions into her posts. I don't think she was trying to implicate that all rap exists between these two points in the slightest, but equally I think she was guilty of not thinking through the implications.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:11 (twenty-two years ago)

(sorry custos, yr apology was a handsome gesture and u r excused guilt for the hive mentalism)

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:18 (twenty-two years ago)

dan yes that's true, but when the mask (as in this case, a bit too often) is given a quasi-political spin — viz "i am agin all bling bcz anyone but an idiot can 'see through' the ideology that constructs it" — then it's proper that the mask be given a good tweak now and then

if the argt is that trife instead gave it a BAD tweak i am agnostic, cz it led to both interesting and stupid debates intertwined

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:24 (twenty-two years ago)

(cf for example yr justified and articulate annoyance when present-day R&B melisma gets a blanket diss as "soulless" or similar nonsense = constructive, instructive, insightful and interesting tweak to the hatemask)

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:29 (twenty-two years ago)

can someone explain the puzzling frequency of those mainstream-press 'defenses' that mention some obscure and anachronistic exception as their main plank, ie "people who make blingblinghomophobicthug complaints about hip hop are just wrong and ignorant, look at Me Phi Me for example"

dave q, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:30 (twenty-two years ago)

(I'm not sure that's a strong analogy, Mark, mostly because you're comparing a general dismissal of an entire to style of music to the specific dismissal of one individual.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:52 (twenty-two years ago)

ok that's a fair point dan (i mean, yes i'm arguing that trife is honeytrappishly encouraging his beaterdowners to use p.diddy metaleptically [= as an iconic figure for the whole] bcz a. i genuinely think he *is* doing this — tho also he just likes him and sadly seeks the ilm p.diddy love, but in vain — and b. if he's NOT then yes of course his argt collapses rather quickly, and i prefer to assume he's smarter than that, ESP. since many of his opponents on that thread are actually totally doing this exact metaleptic math, as he guesses they will, and the fact that they do is what proves his point...)

(however "no no but don't you see its very riskiness is what makes this such a brilliant tactic, unfortunately the enemy unbrilliantly misunderstood it and won the battle with their lack of respect for twinkling genius" is always a silly line to take in discussions of affairs military, so i shall instead switch my entire point to "if anyone is saying there is NOTHING to discuss here, they are wrong: if they are saying this is not the way to start the discussion, that's a difft argt and true or false should not be allowed entirely to shut down the actual real first discussion forever...")

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:14 (twenty-two years ago)

haha "actual real first discussion" = what *i* am interested in talking abt obv

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:20 (twenty-two years ago)

"What bothers me most about Dee's post is that it puts all rapping on a continuum between "po' folks" and "tasteless hound
dogs".


this is complete bullshit and not what happened at all,it was actually trife that placed all rapping on that continuum

dee said she didn't like videos with rapper's displaying their wealth in a way that she thought was tasteless
this was used to back up her hatred for puff daddy

then trife made some idiotic "yeah dee,all black people should make themselves look poor in their videos" post thus instantly changing dee's suggestion that perhaps videos would be better if they were anything other than ostentatious displays of wealth (ie infinite possibilities) into saying that the only alternative was that black people should just look poor (reducing it to one alternative)
this goes beyond putting words into someone's mouth into trife actually being the one who brough up the idea

robin (robin), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:27 (twenty-two years ago)

also,sterling,try engaging people in discussion on a neutral level

this "tell me your political opinions and i'll decide if you're racist or not based on my own criteria and nothing else" stuff is bollocks,as is your insistence on making snide remarks about anyone who is not equipped to argue in exactly the terms you use

this kills as many threads and prevents as many people from posting what they think as any troll
it doesn't make people feel that they should think carefully about what they're saying,it just makes them feel you'll jump down their throat if they phrase a sentence even slightly badly,regardless of what they actually mean
ilx is a public forum,having your own "rules" to the "game" and expecting everyone to know them is childish and pointless,why not try and be inclusive so as to try and gain information from as many viewpoints as possible,rather than only allowing discussion on your terms and belittling anyone who can't

robin (robin), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:32 (twenty-two years ago)

"issues of intra-ethnic class shd not be raised"

vs

"issues of intra-ethnic class shd only be raised in nice ways" (nice acc.who?)

vs

"issues of intra-ethnic class shd only be raised in correct ways" (correct acc.who?)

vs

"issues of intra-ethnic class shd only be raised in effective ways" (effective acc.who?)

etc

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:34 (twenty-two years ago)

trife is *genuinely* angry at the generalisation which dee makes and robin (w/o thinking twice about it) just now defends: ie he knows it will come it and points pre-emptive sarcasm at it

if this sarcasm had exploded the generalisation into a proper exploration of it, this is a good tactic: if it doesn't, it isn't => robin's complaint ("stop being scornful and tell me the problem") is a perfectly fair one, i think

(assuming the "good" is exploration on these boards, which from the perspective of the boards it is, but which from the perspective of the world is a bit hive-centric)

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:42 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.vh1.com/shared/media/images/sn_legacy/sonicnet/assetmedia/bands/images/1169_1310.gif
"You guys are kuh-ray-zee. Peace out."

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:51 (twenty-two years ago)

my entire family (grandfather, father, sister) are/were professional teachers, so i am by upbringing milieu inclined something to disdain the kneejerk phrase "been there done that" (which is the impatient snort underlying trife's intervention AND sterl's support of it, i think), except that

i. i have all my life been in somewhat complex oedipal revolt against this teaching milieu, as "square" blah blah (ie "yes yes we know that, let's get to the good stuff")
ii. my absolute dearest friend is just now going through a lifecrisis of disgust and exhaustion at teaching-as-it-currently-is, having done it for 20 years, which can be diagnosed as a massive mid-life "been-there-done-that" crisis

(ie this is i guess why i seem to be arguing both ends against one another here, which has got to be a loser's game, which i'm now going to stop)

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Mark, you're beginning to sound like the typically wobbly liberal excuse for certain kinds of bad behavior (extremist culture, un-PC commedians, random bile). It goes something like "well, X may be horribly offensive and be completely against every single last thing I stand for...but at least X makes you think, right?" Something which typically redirects and defuses whatever X is talking about -- it allows X a mere positive social function when X obviously wants to be so much more than a mere positive social function.

I mean, right now you're talking about matters of behavior & etiquette, not the subject of racial double standards, which was trife's initial bone of contention. Which is to say that his sarcasm really hasn't brought about greater understanding about matters Diddy, has it?

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually, I'm using "liberal" as a scare word, so you might want to ignore that...hmm...

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:00 (twenty-two years ago)

heh

i don't actually see how what you just said is really v.difft to what i just said, michael: i am projecting also naturally (= trife makes me think, so sue me!)

i do wish ethan wd write his argument up in longer paragraphs sometimes and not just expect everyone to make the jumps with him (even if i myself like being made to make jumps): i think he's ten times more interesting on mainstream rap than most anti-bling kneejerk is, precisely bcz he CAN make interpol vs unrest-style minute distinctions between p.diddy and who-the-bling-ever (i mean, i know fuck all abt rap, this is why i'm interested), which the haters rush to paper over...

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:12 (twenty-two years ago)

re:mark's according to who post
obviously everything is subjective,etcetc
but just pointing this out is like saying "that's just an opinion,everyone has their own" in a discussion-there's no point,of course everyone has an opinion,discussions exist so that people can exchange opinions
the point is that people should make an effort to make any discussion open to as many people as possible,rather than frame it within some trendy discourse/"game"
obviously there are no hard and fast rules for doing so,but common sense should suffice-something like racism is a topic which most people could be expected to have a reasonably good discussion about,presuming a certain amount of intelligence,my problem was that i feel that no effort whatsoever was being made to make the conversation
reasonably(using one's own judgement) coherent to all concerned

robin (robin), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:21 (twenty-two years ago)

also,if someone who says they are not a racist has phrased something in such a way that it might seem to imply that they are,to assume based on semantics that they are lying and are actually racist rather than to assume it was a badly expressed opinion which may have been misleading seems absurd

robin (robin), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I go to sleep and everybody gets their panties in a twist, why do I always miss out on the panty-twisting

I would say that Ethan is entirely a force for good - which is why I want to argue with him! he really does seem to think that hatin' on bling=culturally acceptable (wrongly so) expression of racial fear/hate, and I disagree strongly with him BUT!!! agree with mark s.'s set-in-genetic-stone liberal mindset "this has made me think, therefore it is good" - which mindset I have struggled a lot with, i.e. if somebody burned down my house, well, that'd make me think plenty, but even if I underwent some serious emotional growth as a result, I'd still rather keep my stuff & not lose a lot of money

ok that got a little lost

my point is that I do believe that Ethan's flinging about of the term "racist" is actually beneficial! I hate Puff Daddy records, but I haven't really thought long and hard about why: I emerge from discussing the matter with Ethan realizing that my response is rather more complex than I'd thought, questioning those responses, able to better articulate why I think "Been Around the World" is just k-lame

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:27 (twenty-two years ago)

ok but if the rules of civil discourse YOU'RE invoking exclude all p.diddy lovers then why is what you're asking difft to what yr complaining abt?

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I honestly have no idea what you just said :(

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Question: "Is it more noble for Rappers to look 'ostentatiously wealthy' or 'geto-hard keepin-it-real'"?
My Answer: When rappers all look like space aliens, robots or Shaolin Monks, then and only then will peace be achieved. Busta Rhymes showed us the ONE TRUE PATH, and sadly, he's the only practitioner.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:39 (twenty-two years ago)

"custos is demented dalek-speek shockah"
(I said it so jess wouldn't have to.)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:40 (twenty-two years ago)

In regards to the Puffy-Hate-Equals-Something-More line of discussion...

I personally very much hate a great many Puffy Daddy records, and I have thought about why: it's cuz he's a god-awful weak-flow-having rapper. I honestly wouldn't mind the way he re-uses old material if he would just actually, y'know, DELIVER on the mic. Rhymes = unimaginative. Rhythm/meter = bland & over-simplistic. Wordplay = elementary. Vocal cadence/delivery = lazy & sloppy & inarticulate. If you can find some way that this equates to racism, well, that's an argument I'd LOVE to hear (er, read).

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)

my point is that I do believe that Ethan's flinging about of the term "racist" is actually beneficial!

How, exactly? I am not being obtuse, and much as I respect where you and Mark S are trying to come from, I don't buy it.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:52 (twenty-two years ago)

See Ned, by calling everyone who hates Diddy a racist, Ethan is making a statement about how we live in a racist society and how many people complicitly buy into these values and perpetuate its sustained existence. The unfortunate side-effect of equating a subliminal side-effect of living in a racist society with actively burning crosses on Diddy's front yard and trying to string up his whole family from poplar trees really isn't important here.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:59 (twenty-two years ago)

well - it's what I said above: Ethan's position (which, at the end of all this, I still think of as wrong, deeply wrong) seems to be:

1. if a white person thinks old-school rap is good but that it went wrong somewhere along the line, that's suspect
2. if a white person likes brainy college-edumacated emcees but has a loud distaste for chart-hop, that's suspect
2a. cf. "I love Abba, but screw the Backstreet Boys, it's so pre-fab"
3. people who fit in somewhere around the area of 1) and 2) haven't examined (the source of) their attitudes toward chart-hop

...I don't know, this'd take longer than I've got - I have punk rock sympathies, I have this gut feeling that getting "called on your shit" (even wrongly) is an opportunity for reflection, and I hope that that's Ethan's point! because I refuse to believe that he thinks that everybody who likes Rakim is necessarily a Klansman

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)

"Oriental" has a lot of off-base etymological and historical baggage

Just curious, but what is this baggage of which you speak? "Orient" literally means the east, no? It comes from the Latin for "to rise", since the sun rises in the east. It is the exact opposite of "occident", which means the west, and comes from the Latin for "to fall", since the sun sets in the west. How is this off-base?

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:08 (twenty-two years ago)

The unfortunate side-effect of equating a subliminal side-effect of living in a racist society with actively burning crosses on Diddy's front yard and trying to string up his whole family from poplar trees really isn't important here.
Um, yes it is. It's a distinction he seems incapable of making.
His Professor Griff impersonation is dreadful, and I refuse to play the part of the Villian in his latest episode of "Paranoid Morality Play Theatre"

his posts all boil down to "p diddy r0x0r, u r all nazis"
(xpost)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Nate, "east" according to where? that's the point.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah. To the Japanese, America is to the East.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, but you could just as easily say "west" with respect to what. I've never Westerners complain about being considered to be in the "West".

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Amazing, Dan! (Custos, you missed the point...)

John, I don't think that about Ethan either -- I just think, as Dan rather trenchantly notes, that his approach, far from being punk rock (and that term was crossing my mind too), demeans himself, the subject under discussion and more besides. I don't find it shocking or some sort of upsetting of a natural complacency, I just find it goddamn dull and insulting, and I admit annoyance at seeing it excused or coddled.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Why is West better than East? Before the discovery of the New World, Asia was in the eastern part of the known world, and Europe was in the western part. That is just simple geography. I really can't see how it could be considered a slur.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:16 (twenty-two years ago)

well, to follow from that etymology, it means billions of people are named what they are just by their relation to Mother Rome.

That's just to follow your post, but fyi it JUST IS a slur in the lived-in world, you seeing-how or not. Though now becoming archaic enough to be nearly forgotten, it seems (+ complicated by the word still used uh commercially: "Shuang Hur Oriental Market" down the street from me etc etc)

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:24 (twenty-two years ago)

>>"What bothers me most about Dee's post is that it puts all rapping
>>on a continuum between "po' folks" and "tasteless hound
>>dogs".

>>this is complete bullshit and not what happened at all,it was >>actually trife that placed all rapping on that continuum

Yes, as a cartoonish exaggeration of what he imagines clueless diddy-haters think. Dee fell right into the trap.

Just remember everybody, if you have the feeling that you're digging your own grave and ethan offers to give you a hand with your shovel, DON'T DO IT.

People also need to remember that "p diddy" (I thought that name was lame THEN and i think it's lame NOW) has built his rep as a PRODUCER and PROMOTER and AGENT so to dis just on the basis of his rhymes and flow is accurate, but largely beside the point—sort of like calling Shaq a terrible jump-shooter.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:33 (twenty-two years ago)

john d that response wz to robin not you, but stupidly i wrote and posted it real quick cz ed was just then arriving to help teach me how to access slsk in return for a lend of books abt cromwell

(it involves a download which is currently taking SIX HOURS gah)

so anyway plz everyone (inc.robin primarily) ignore the post right after john d's: i know what i mean and it is germane but one sentence is WAY too compressed to say it clearly

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:42 (twenty-two years ago)

but fyi it JUST IS a slur in the lived-in world, you seeing-how or not

In my experience, the term "Oriental" used as an adjective is still quite common and not at all a slur. To refer to East Asian people as "Orientals" is perhaps a bit old-fashioned and not the preferred term. But using "Oriental" as an adjective seems to be widely accepted.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)

nate, I'd think some more about that. "oriental"=not dissimilar to "colored"

there's a feeling I get when i look to the west

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:55 (twenty-two years ago)

is sometimes a mask for the crappiest kind of middleclass assumptions about "what black americans ought to be doing, feeling, saying"

See Mark this is true and precisely what I was trying to get at above (and why I was irked that Dee's defense of herself turned into a referendum on whether black people as a group had anything to complain about) -- and yes yes sure Ethan's accusations do force people to talk more about why they hate someone like Puffy, which gives you more material to sort through and try to figure out whether that assumption is there or not. But it's a ridiculous form of discourse: it's the equivalent of walking into a room and yelling "you are all of you assholes" just to see whose reaction to that does turn out to be assholish. It does less to make people honestly think about and discuss whether there are elements of that in their thinking and more to make them just cover their bases against Trifean accusations -- and this sort of base-covering discourages thought, because it has people rushing to set up rhetorical barriers rather than actually examine what's behind them. And while in the short term it gets people to lay down their cards on the issue, in the long term it makes them hold those cards closer to their chests and never look at them, because they know that showing them is going to open them up to snarky accusations that they can never respond intelligently to.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:58 (twenty-two years ago)

n I think you're probably right, however this:

it's the equivalent of walking into a room and yelling "you are all of you assholes" just to see whose reaction to that does turn out to be assholish

gives me the hard giggles

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 15:07 (twenty-two years ago)

And for the record I tend to think this is true of a certain subset of black accusations of racism in the political sense: there comes a point where telling white people they're racist doesn't make them think, but instead makes them completely scared of the topic of race at all, makes them fear -- and by extension patronize or neglect -- anything valid anyone does have to say about the issue. This is something I genuinely dislike these days: I dislike that many people have gotten to the point where they seem to feel cornered and defenseless concerning anything having even the most innocuous relation to race, to the point of apology and to the point of pretending they're somehow at a disadvantage to minorities ("I'm sorry, I am so white"). I dislike that many people (and don't get me wrong, this is more their fault) have come to the decision that there's just no winning on this issue, so anyone's raising it becomes just so much background noise to be politely listened to, never thought about, and responded to in whatever way the listener things will make him look least like a racist. Overplaying accusations of racism -- and that's what Trife does, he calls everyone racist just to see whose reaction displays shades of bigotry -- do not further a racial dialogue, they shut it down.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 15:12 (twenty-two years ago)

nate, I'd think some more about that. "oriental"=not dissimilar to "colored"

Well, I'm not always current with the latest trends in usage, so perhaps I'm behind the curve on this one. The boundaries of taste, esp. when it comes to ethnic terms, are fluid, and sometimes terms can leave a bad taste in the mouth for no apparent reason that can be traced to the literal etymology. I know that dictionaries tend to be behind the curve as well, but I'd still point out that in Webster's, the entry for the term "colored" to refer to a black person is marked with the warning message: sometimes offensive - whereas the entry for the term "Oriental" to refer to an Asian person carries no warning label. Perhaps usage is changing though. But I still doubt that the offense of the term has anything to do with "orient" literally meaning "east" - I think it's more a matter of mental associations that people have with the term.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 15:14 (twenty-two years ago)

ok nabs fair enough (in fact didn't i already say this, re "effective" tactics etc?) (i wasn't saying they are, i wz asking, are they?) (=> poss ans = no) but the whole thing did occur on a thread called "who do you most want to punch?" = it is not just any old room being walked into

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 15:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Walking into a room full of pugilists and shouting "HEY PUNCH ME YOU FLOPPY BAG OF DICKS": C/D?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 15:21 (twenty-two years ago)

OED doesn't have a warning either. But just as "colored" is a vestige of an earlier mode of race consciousness (where white was a norm and anyone else was "of color"--although this last phrase is still common for some reason and certainly this conception of things has hardly passed into history), "Oriental" is troublesome because it doesn't have a counterpart (I've never heard anyone refer to a person as "Occidental") and is thus Eurocentric.

P.S. What is the other of the Other?

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 15:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Nate, "negro" just means black, after all. It's not the etymology of the word, it's the use-history which makes it problematic.

Clarke B., Wednesday, 11 June 2003 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Edward Said to thread! (Amateurist, you can add the umlaut if you like.)

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 15:37 (twenty-two years ago)

dan the answer to that is classic obv!!

anyway comeuppance time for mark s on this thread = opera quit when i posted that last post and my download got fucked so uh yeah

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah Mark I realized that the instant I hit "Submit".

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 15:55 (twenty-two years ago)

''but the whole thing did occur on a thread called "who do you most want to punch?" = it is not just any old room being walked into''

and that is an important point when dealing with what has been going on.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Edward Said doesn't have an umlaut to my knowledge!

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 16:12 (twenty-two years ago)

no he doesn't but he should considering the pronounciation of his name.

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 16:16 (twenty-two years ago)

(you try telling him that though)

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 16:18 (twenty-two years ago)

all this geographyism could have been avoided if only the planet had developed 2 perpendicular magnetic fields

or perhaps 2 simultaneous axes of spin, which might have been more fun

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 16:18 (twenty-two years ago)

"Edward Said" is one the 6th Velvet Underground album.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 17:04 (twenty-two years ago)

looking back through the "punch" thread it struck me how long it went on without trife using the "r" word at all and also how many people stopped by to register their unease with it without actually duking it out.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 17:18 (twenty-two years ago)

oh and apologies to amateurist who didn't deserve the harshness i treated him with but just got caught up in the middle of something.

like i guess it just snapped something in me to get told that i'm too "out there" by somebody whose tastes run closer towards those of buscemi in ghostworld than anyone else i've ever met.

(this is meant with all possible affection).

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 17:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Trife's third post on the thread (or does the word actually have to be used in order to count, Sterling?):

its like ilm is mark fuhrman and yo look out jay z is driving while black!!!

-- trife (...), June 8th, 2003. (later)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 17:25 (twenty-two years ago)

sterl, good to see you took some time to mellow out at the dave matthews beachhouse with some of yr 15 yr old buds!

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 17:31 (twenty-two years ago)

ned there's clearly a difference between that jibe and a serious "you are all racist" accusation. and by the time trife's "i don't see how anyone can want to punch puffy and not be racist" a LOT of water had gone under the bridge that gave that comment its punch.

(y3ncey actually it was listening to the black eyed peas and fat joe and puffy and busta on the radio driving this morning and thinking "let the hatas say what they want i'm listening to my music and i'm happy.")

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 17:45 (twenty-two years ago)

In my experience, the term "Oriental" used as an adjective is still quite common and not at all a slur. To refer to East Asian people as "Orientals" is perhaps a bit old-fashioned and not the preferred term. But using "Oriental" as an adjective seems to be widely accepted.
Ahhh...here's some food for thought.
Go check the Suchin Pak & Gideon Yago thread again.
You'll notice that s trife (as "xx") flips out about the word "oriental" and accuses me of being into child porn.
Now scroll backward a couple of posts...
you'll see two other posters making jokes about "Suchin Pak == Supa Chink"
Apparently, in trife's world "oriental" is a vile cussword whereas "Chink" is a completely acceptable and neutral descriptor.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 17:47 (twenty-two years ago)

i think it might have more to do with the fact that those posters didnt start a thread on a public forum calling him out

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 17:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Come OFF it, Sterling. Within a few posts of that Trife is making 'jibes' about racial profiling and J0hn is already calling him on how idiotic he was acting. The point isn't that the thread (or Trife) suddenly turned 'serious,' the point is that his antics were already irritating, the same stupid game one more time, and that he was already getting a deserved smackdown for it, before Dee (for instance) said a word -- and unsurprisingly Trife either learns nothing or, apparently, we're all supposed to chortle and indulge that side of him.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 17:56 (twenty-two years ago)

...custos said that looking for racial issues is "paranoid"...
sigh.
That. is. not. what. I. said.
Running into a chatroom and randomly insulting people does not count as "in depth discussion of a complex issue."
He is essentially calling us all creeps and we're supposed to smile and say "oh, what a courageous rebel-rouser you are"
He seems to think he has some magickal ability to see into the depths of another soul...and only see darkness there.
I've ignored him for two years (even after he implied that I wasn't merely a bigot, but a paedo as well.) and yesterday, I just couldn't *stand it* anymore.
And somehow...I'm the villian.
Typical.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 17:57 (twenty-two years ago)

From my Asian friends: Things are Oriental, people are Asian.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 18:32 (twenty-two years ago)

I do find it interesting that there isn't a PC euphemism for "white"

Caucasian?

Øystein Holm-Olsen (Øystein H-O), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)

p diddy is kinda racist against his own people! remember on making the band when he got mad at the kids for acting too "street" ???

chaki (chaki), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 18:50 (twenty-two years ago)

p diddy is an entrepeneur first, a record producer second, a member of the community (black white or otherwise) third, and a rapper decidedly fourth. there's nothing wrong with this, but denying any of it seems a bit myopic.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 18:54 (twenty-two years ago)

"Caucasian" is funny as a PC-term cuz like only 1% of white people actually have ancestry from the Caucasus.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Don't forget that P. Diddy was partially responsible for those people dying at that charity basketball game he set up some years back. I hate him more for that than any music he created.

(but I think I hate the American justice system more for letting him off virtually scot-free.)

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:03 (twenty-two years ago)

I really hate Puffy for unleashing Ma$e upon the world, almost as much as I hate Wyclef for that fucking horrible song that sample "99 Luftballooons".

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:06 (twenty-two years ago)

madness.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:07 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.artistdirect.com/showcase/urban/photos/mase.gif
Yo Dan, you never cleaned all them bootyflakes off my floor dawg, holla!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:12 (twenty-two years ago)

nick, for real, hands off ma$e

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:17 (twenty-two years ago)

You don't own that image, jess. Artistsdirect.com does.

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Okay, this might be completely obvious and passe by now, but isn't it possible to "hate" Puffy because he comes across as really smug and annoying? I'm not talking about on record -- I could really care less and I think most of his records are dull but he's hardly worth a logistical beatdown or anything -- but *damn* did you all watch Making the Band? He's such the asshole-boss-type! His criticisms are so vague and played-out. He's like an alternate universe inverse of the teacher who spouts empty slogans like "Be Yourself" and stuff. That part where all the contestants have to *recite* that ugly macho slogan from the wall?? Ugh.

Clarke B. (stolenbus), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.mtv.com/news/images/m/masevid980708.gif
Damn jess you don't own me dawg!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:20 (twenty-two years ago)

hey clarke can i borrow yr pointy white hat when yr done? thx!

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:22 (twenty-two years ago)

hey stence i liked it better when you were trying to pretend like you liked ilx

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:23 (twenty-two years ago)

jess I think it was that I was pretending to like you.

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:25 (twenty-two years ago)

ha ha don't do me any favors big boy

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:28 (twenty-two years ago)

uh, um, sure.

(I really hope you're not taking me seriously, jess.)

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:30 (twenty-two years ago)

This one's for the ma$e pics:

http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=bitchslap

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:30 (twenty-two years ago)

not that i'm particularly invested in the dynamic of ilm, but since this thread is hella entertaining, i'll throw in my $.02.

p.diddy can't flow, his rhymes are boring (and generally ghostwritten, from what i understand - "i don't write rhymes, i write checks"), he usually under enuciates, and his production blatently panders to the listener's sence of nostalgia. all these qualities he seems to share with the worst underground artists, even if the outcome is a bit different. but he did give us biggie, so how can you hate on him?

also, s trife needlessly politicizes those tastes he disagrees with and his accusations of racism are as flimsy and ultimately self-destructive and contradictory as the indie argument about supporting corporate culture, selling out, blah blah blah... but he does seem to function well as a provocateur. and i enjoy his posts and reviews.

s>c>, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry Dan. I will now go back to respecting your authoritah. My bad.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:34 (twenty-two years ago)

i love how jess is a complete utter ass to the end, preferring personal insults to any substantial arguments. you, trife and clover are good company. plus, trife, obviously you are part of the elite ILM contingent so don't even try to pretend that you are opposed to the ILM Orthodoxy when you are in with those in control of ILM itself. disagreement doesn't need to necessitate being a prick.

general zod, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:43 (twenty-two years ago)

That line gets twisted alot -- I think he actually says "don't worry if I write rhymes: I write checks." (In other words, he doesn't care what you think of his rhymes cause he's making money either way.)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:44 (twenty-two years ago)

"in control of ILM itself"!!!

anyway i posted mainly becuz i wanted oops to reread the thing where he sez: "but yes, I think Em's a whigger, I hate Puffy cuz he's a successful black man, I think black people bitch too much, I am a slow learner, I just recently was able to tie my shoes by myself, I think ILM is a worthwhile place to be, I love people who's sole purpose in posting is to point out the shortcomings and perceived misdoings of others." and think about how he felt when he wrote it and then go back and listen to Eminem's "I Am" and see if he liked it any better.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:47 (twenty-two years ago)

"general zod" those might be good points if they made any sense at all

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:48 (twenty-two years ago)

"Getting" a song != "Liking" a song, Sterling.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:51 (twenty-two years ago)

was i even involved in this thread? i forget.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:51 (twenty-two years ago)

"Whigger"!! Yeah, he fronts like he's down with the National Bank, but we all know what's up.

Clarke B. (stolenbus), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 19:55 (twenty-two years ago)

the crucial difference here isn't about ideas or race-baiting or anything of that sort, as I see it - what seems to have happened is that most people on ILM didn't really want to go for the jugular, had no interest in calling each other bigots or idiots, and wanted instead to have a reasonable argument and try to make others understand exactly why (other than sublimated ethnic hatred) they wanted to sock [ x hip hop musician or whatever ] in the teefs.

Meanwhile a small number of other people didn't see fit to find anything admirable or worthwhile in their fellow posters and decided it was more fun and a better expenditure of effort to generalize, make assumptions and antagonize everyone within shouting distance. It should be completely unnecessary to name names.

It's a matter of respect for others is all it is. Trolling is inherently an issue about lack of respect, which is why Calum is a troll and Geir isn't. Now go forth and misunderstand me at will.

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 20:07 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm posting not because I've yet figured out what I want to say, but because I want this conversation to continue. A weakness of the Christgau piece I linked to above is that Christgau lauds "impolite discourse" but he doesn't say what's good about it, especially given that there are good reasons to oppose such a discourse. Here's a quote from John Dewey, who was in philosophical opposition to the "spectator theory of knowledge" but who himself always wrote like a spectator:

"I am inclined to believe that the heart of and final guarantee of democracy is in free gatherings of neighbors on the street corner to discuss back and forth what is read in uncensored news of the day, and in gatherings of friends in the living rooms of houses and apartments to converse freely with one another. Intolerance, abuse, calling of names because of differences of opinion about religion or politics or business, as well as because of differences of race, color, wealth, or degree of culture are treason to the democratic way of life.... Merely legal guarantees of the civil liberties of free belief, free expression, free assembly are of little avail if in daily life freedom of communication, the give and take of ideas, facts, experiences, is choked by mutual suspicion, by abuse, by fear and hatred."

Now, I find that passage to be choking in contradictions, and I think that the decent academic prose that Dewey epitomizes is itself a kind of deadness and bigotry - well, not the prose itself, but the insistence in Universities and in Journalism that (to some extent) everyone write like that. But there are reasons to try to make everyone write the same, just as there are reasons to make people wear school uniforms and follow dress codes. Sure, uniforms suppress diversity and personality, but in doing so don't they also suppress social conflict and violence? This isn't a rhetorical question either: I don't know if uniformity suppresses conflict and violence, but even if it did I'd be against it. But maybe the consequences of genuine freedom are that people get hurt. Anyway, I grew up in a college town: the pretence was that it was an intellectual utopia, the reality was that whole categories of people (call 'em rocks, hoods, greasers, beer freaks, grits, burnouts, dirtbags, stoners) got their esteem smashed in that nice town, in nice language, as did individuals, as did the people that the hoods et al. scapegoated in retaliation, so my discovering Meltzer at age 15 in 1969 was a return of the repressed for me: he was an intellectual who was actually speaking the social war that everyone was living through, not hiding it behind politics but just ripping. Abuse was in his words, but the abuse was in the world anyway. But...

Richard Meltzer - trivializer of the awesome or awesomiser of the trivial?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 20:18 (twenty-two years ago)

then go back and listen to Eminem's "I Am" and see if he liked it any better.

Once again you're making assumptions. Do you know how I feel about that song? Um, no. No you do not.
Anyway...I posted that AFTER you made your condescending remarks to me. Likewise, you took something i said ('trife, are you for real?') out of context (i said it only referring to his professed love for Puffy's dance at the VMAs) to suit your preconceived ideas.
Anything more you'd like to teach me?

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 20:21 (twenty-two years ago)

man oops, why are you thinking about it so much? stop thinking so much. you're reading too much into nothing. man.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 20:26 (twenty-two years ago)

sigh. i sorta assumed you didn't like the song since you don't seem to like em. i don't know. why don't you tell me how you feel about it?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 20:30 (twenty-two years ago)

All of oops's posts make like 100% sense when read with a Principal Skinner voice.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 20:40 (twenty-two years ago)

i never thought i'd say it but the nogoodniks rule this school

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 20:43 (twenty-two years ago)

So basically your stance is that now, after pissing off a great deal of people, you say that discourse ahould have no rules, and that sometimes people just get hurt in the process of healthy conversation and sharing of ideas? That any rules imposed on discourse are pointless and stifling? That you don't have to respect others because you believe something else besides what they do?

Well I believe that racial, ethnic and homophobic slurs are perfectly harmless words that should be printed in the largest typeface possible. (thinks about it) (leaves it at that)

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 20:45 (twenty-two years ago)

(that was a kogan quote, btw. as part of his approaching the question "what is the intellectual value of meltzer's nastiness?")

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 20:52 (twenty-two years ago)

good comeback! kogan makes you right and me wrong!

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)

related q: what is the intellectual value of millar's nastiness?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:02 (twenty-two years ago)

It makes Sterling look smarter than he actually is?

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:12 (twenty-two years ago)

this is like the last season of oz

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Minus the lezzing it up.

Nicole (Nicole), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:24 (twenty-two years ago)

But Sterl, ILx is in no way like that college town, unless you want to go for total rhetorical overkill and say that whole classes of people are getting *their* self-esteem smashed here.

ILx might be like that college town after Richard Meltzer arrived...and left, leaving everyone to pick up the pieces and get on with their lives.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Another way of saying this might be to point out it's not 1969 anymore.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I've been posting here at ILM for about a year now, and for a huge chunk of that time, we talked about music. But in the last month or so, I've seen like a hundred anti-troll, trolls. In fact, I very rarely see troll posts, usually just tons of "HEY (insert guy no one likes) KNOCK IT OFF!!" posts. Do the people who post these things think they are doing the board some sort of service?

David Allen, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:29 (twenty-two years ago)

nutritional value > intellectual value

http://www.wolfiesnuts.com/images/Bag%20-Redskin%20Peanuts.jpg

go on, take one.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:31 (twenty-two years ago)

sterling clover knows about critical theorists and likes pop music and i don't know if he likes indie rock. i don't know much about him. i read his website before but it's very, very hard to understand and i checked it again a few times and he hadn't updated it.

i would give him: 8/10.


s trife is, i think, from athens, georgia, where r.e.m. is from and everyone likes indie rock and he likes the linkin park remix album and he bought a bee shirt like an indie rocker would wear and he reviewed an eminem cd for pitchforkmedia, an indie rocker website. he once told me that rap-rock sincerity was the new faux-naif. he e-mailed me once and asked if i had AIM and he told me to get it. but i don't know what the whole thing was all about. i thought it was cool that he e-mailed me but we never talked after that.

i would give him: 9/10.


jess is from the east coast, i think, and wrote about dj sammy in the village voice, which is a magazine or a newspaper in new york city, and he has a girlfriend named nancy. he didn't like indie rock for a while but then he started to like it again. he thought 'satisfaction' was the best hip-hop single of the year. he's always saying how bad ilm is. i don't know how to react to that.

i would give him: 6/10.

d k (d k), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Hahahaha I can't believe Amateurist posted a picture of redskin peanuts on this thread.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I am wearing a stylish J Crew white shirt with a nice navy-blue knit collar and just got a haircut earlier today. I would give myself 10/10.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Amateurist I kiss you

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:51 (twenty-two years ago)

i sorta assumed

This is your main problem. Do something about it.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 22:16 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm still really confused as to how i keep getting lumped in with all this nonsense

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 23:06 (twenty-two years ago)

because you're GOD

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 23:16 (twenty-two years ago)

god gets a 6/10

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 23:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Probably by posting on this thread more than twenty times, Jess.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 23:19 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, I dunno jess. you're never mean to anyone.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 23:20 (twenty-two years ago)

i never thought it was possible to have a thread where i disagreed with every single poster, but here we are

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 23:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean, yeah, you're right Jess -- you were barely even a minor player on the original beat-down thread -- but still, your rep for bitter musings (which may or may not be unfairly attached to you) is just gonna keep following you around.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 23:21 (twenty-two years ago)

sigh

it's hard working being me

god (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 23:24 (twenty-two years ago)

i mean, i'm really quite the pussycat

god (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 23:24 (twenty-two years ago)

except for that whole sodom & gomorrah thing, that was horseshit

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 23:26 (twenty-two years ago)

jess, doesn't that describe 80% of ILX threads?

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 23:26 (twenty-two years ago)

pussyhound more like

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 23:26 (twenty-two years ago)

(oh no shit that's me)

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 23:27 (twenty-two years ago)

3/8

Lynskey (Lynskey), Thursday, 12 June 2003 00:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Has anyone ever noticed how similar "Daftendirekt" by Daft Punk and "Breathe Deep" by Cabaret Volatire are? I just keep playing one and then the other incessently. They both make me inexplicably happy.

flightsatdusk (flightsatdusk), Thursday, 12 June 2003 02:08 (twenty-two years ago)

(nabisco: i was hoping someone would notice that.)

amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 12 June 2003 02:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I just wanted to stop in and say that if Ethan is Pyro, I wanna be Dr. Grey.

Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 12 June 2003 03:31 (twenty-two years ago)

you're totally Rogue

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 12 June 2003 04:02 (twenty-two years ago)

What's 'Breathe Deep' on?

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 12 June 2003 04:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Why the hell am I Rogue?

Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I call dibs on Magneto

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Not

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:09 (twenty-two years ago)

you rang?
http://wrvu.org/images/events/dibbs.jpg

oops (Oops), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)

"Breathe Deep" is on 2x45 which to my ears is CV's highwater mark

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)

john do you still need a copy of that?

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:17 (twenty-two years ago)

seven months pass...
this trife/$$ dude really is a farkin twunt, t'aint he?

0", Sunday, 8 February 2004 16:22 (twenty-two years ago)

i dont believe that to be the case

Stringent Stepper (Stringent), Sunday, 8 February 2004 17:12 (twenty-two years ago)

four years pass...

Me: Priya changed her sked (schedule) so she could add more classes to her daytime.
Ryan: What classes?
Me: History...English. (sips coffee)
Lydia: English?
Ryan: ESL? (English as a second Language)
Me: Naw. More advanced. She speaks very eloquently.
Lydia: "Priya?" What nationality is that?
Me: She's an Indian.
(cue nosy PC lady)

and what, Wednesday, 16 April 2008 18:32 (eighteen years ago)

classic thread

Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 16 April 2008 18:34 (eighteen years ago)

sterling clover knows about critical theorists and likes pop music and i don't know if he likes indie rock. i don't know much about him. i read his website before but it's very, very hard to understand and i checked it again a few times and he hadn't updated it.

i would give him: 8/10.

s trife is, i think, from athens, georgia, where r.e.m. is from and everyone likes indie rock and he likes the linkin park remix album and he bought a bee shirt like an indie rocker would wear and he reviewed an eminem cd for pitchforkmedia, an indie rocker website. he once told me that rap-rock sincerity was the new faux-naif. he e-mailed me once and asked if i had AIM and he told me to get it. but i don't know what the whole thing was all about. i thought it was cool that he e-mailed me but we never talked after that.

i would give him: 9/10.

jess is from the east coast, i think, and wrote about dj sammy in the village voice, which is a magazine or a newspaper in new york city, and he has a girlfriend named nancy. he didn't like indie rock for a while but then he started to like it again. he thought 'satisfaction' was the best hip-hop single of the year. he's always saying how bad ilm is. i don't know how to react to that.

i would give him: 6/10.

-- d k (d k), Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:43 PM (4 years ago) Bookmark Link

and what, Wednesday, 16 April 2008 18:41 (eighteen years ago)

this trife/$$ dude really is a farkin twunt, t'aint he?

-- 0", Sunday, February 8, 2004 11:22 AM (4 years ago) Bookmark Link

has morbius moved onto "and twunt" yet?

Alex in Baltimore, Wednesday, 16 April 2008 18:46 (eighteen years ago)

morbius can move on?

and what, Wednesday, 16 April 2008 18:49 (eighteen years ago)

::wheelchair joke::

Alex in Baltimore, Wednesday, 16 April 2008 18:50 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.