STOP THE SICK BASTARDS AT CAMBRIDGE FROM OPENING THE PRIMATE LAB...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.animalaid.org.uk/campaign/vivi/cambridge.htm

And there's an entire site for it at:

http://www.primateprison.org/

There's your details. Anyone who even drops and email to Cambridge and tells them that they're against this is doing some good. Here's the addresses (taken from the BUAV site). This needs stopped, animal experimentation, especially on our closest relative in the animal kingdom, is sick and morally wrong.


Vice Chancellor
Address: The Vice Chancellors Office, The Old Schools, Trinity Lane,
Cambridge, CB2 1TN.
Tel: 01223 332290 & 332291.
Fax: 01223 339669
Email: [email protected]

Principle Administration Officers
Addresses: The Old Schools, Trinity Lane, Cambridge, CB2 1TN.

David A Livesey - Secretary General of the Faculties
Tel: 01223 332307
Fax: 01223 332332
Email: [email protected] & [email protected]

Dr Timothy Mead - Registrar
Tel: 01223 332200
Fax: 01223 332332
Email: [email protected] & [email protected]

Joanne M Womack- Treasurer
Tel: 01223 332227
Email: [email protected] & [email protected]

Estate Management & Building Services
Address: 74 Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1RW
Tel: 01223 337700
Fax: 01223 765105

David M Adamson - Director
Tel: 01223 337806
Email: [email protected]
Michael Bienias - Head of Major Projects
Email: [email protected]

The BUAV discovered during their undercover investigation at Cambridge Uni's existing animal labs that technicians were told to
punish the monkeys by withholding food, banging on their cages and slamming cage shutters onto their fingers. LET THEM KNOW WHAT YOU THINK OF THEM!


C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:44 (twenty-two years ago)

You all know you're against this...

C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I actually care more about the fact that amongst an intakle of 11,000 Cambridge University currently contains just 74 black students.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:49 (twenty-two years ago)

It's official, C-Man hasn't seen '28 Days Later'. Do you know what might happen if you and your lentil-eating friends went through with this? Good luck next time you're in hospital.

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:49 (twenty-two years ago)

pic

EMBRACE YOUR FATE

ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Dom - if that means more to you than the sort of shit that goes on in vivisection labs you're sick.

Secondly, mate - "28 Days Later" was shit. Yeah, cos animal welfare/ rights types actually go into biological testing areas and release animals... YEAH. COS WE'RE ALL THICK AS SHIT. If you knew anything you'd know that there's only one UK case of a primate escaping into the wild and that was from Huntingdon Life Sciences themselves whose incompetent wankers actually let the thing out. "28 Days Later" was also factually incorrect as testing on chimps and great apes is now illegal in Europe despite the pro-vivisection mobs best attempts to say otherwise.

As for the photo - I don't find that funny and presume it comes from the mind of someone very sick or very ill-educated on this.

C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Hmm some mistreated monkeys verus a jab for that new strain of influenza that happens to jump to people and spreads from Hong Kong.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:54 (twenty-two years ago)

*makes yacking hand motion in Calz' general direction*

ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Jesus you assholes = read the fucking evidence before PRESUMIG (which is what you are doing) that animal testing leads to the cure for diseases. Do you believe everything the fucking science industry feeds you?

C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:56 (twenty-two years ago)

link
CHOOSE WISELY

ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:57 (twenty-two years ago)

"28 Days Later" was also factually incorrect

Twistin my melon, man

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:58 (twenty-two years ago)

what are you talking about cal¿ doesn't this look fun as shit¿
pic
you should join them.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:58 (twenty-two years ago)

pic
ARE YOU MY MOTHER?

ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Although this is a subject close to my heart, unfortunately Calum, if you really do care about this, ILX is not the place to discuss it, as I am sure nobody will actually take you seriously.

Please stop posting pics of monkeys being tested on.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)

THAT IS SO CUTE

Sarah (starry), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I was looking for screen caps from the "Closer" video, but settled on wiremesh surrogates.

ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Calum has nothing to do with it; I do not take anyone seriously who says that animal testing is a more important issue that racial discrimination.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)

In a horrible way, natch...

x-post

ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, and ModJ clearly doesn't even realise, being a pig shit thick sadistic little cunt, that he's posting pictures of the work done by Satan himself, Harry Harlowe who's test were so cruel and despicable that many within the scientific community now CRINGE at the fuckers name.

C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Racial discrimination is just another side of a very fucked up coin, but you're just shrugging this off (as stupid people do) by saying, "well means nothing to me cos I'm more interested in other things".

C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Way to win people over to your side, dumbass.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:05 (twenty-two years ago)

*makes yacking hand motion in Calz' general direction*

ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Dan, click on the links and read you fucking ignorant asshole. All I see here is someone with a clear mental imbalance and no soul posting pictures of torture which I'd like to see removed as I find them hugely upsetting and live with this shit enough through my reading and viewing on the topic.

C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:07 (twenty-two years ago)

*makes yacking hand motion in Calz' general direction*

ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:08 (twenty-two years ago)

These pictures are not graphic in nature; I am not removing them.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:11 (twenty-two years ago)

calum, serious question - is this just another way for you to get attention here? didn't you expect this kind of response really? isn't it what you wanted? i don't know but i hope you can forgive me for wondering. makes a change from the usual stuff though.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:11 (twenty-two years ago)

These pictures are not graphic

*chuckle*

stevem (blueski), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Calum, I feel the posting of these pics could be seen as offensive, but really, when you start this thread at roughly the same time as one on ILM accusing a long-forgotten pop star of taking the piss out of epileptics for no reason other than a cheap "laugh", do you really expect that people will listen to you and take you seriously no matter how valid your point? You, as has been pointed out ad nauseum, are rapidly losing the right to a fair hearing.

Also, things I find hugely upsetting include assuming someone has a "clear mental imbalance" when what they have is a twisted way of dealing with your posts. If that upsets or offends you, bear that feeling in mind when you jump in with your tuppenceworth elsewhere.

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:12 (twenty-two years ago)

I expected actually reasoning and maybe some sort of intelligence. Maybe some would actually take the time to email about this/ check out the links. History of my posts shows I'm DEADLY SERIOUS about this topic. Instead I get some asshole posting pics of animals about to be tested on (Dan, you've shown how ill informed you are if you don't think these pics are graphic but I can't be arsed explaining... read Deborah Blum's book "The Primate Wars" please and re-join the thread when you're a bit more well up on all this eh? Cheers)...

P.S. i wasn't taking the piss out of a epileptics.

C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:14 (twenty-two years ago)

swearing at people and calling them names is an ineffective way of persuading people to change their minds. can you think of a more succesful way in which to bring people over to your side, or is it merely enough to berate them?

also, i am afraid that on a public forum you are going to have to deal with freedom of speech, and people posting things that you find offensive or disapprove of.

gareth (gareth), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:15 (twenty-two years ago)

c-man, the only way people are going to take this seriously is if you try being civil on ILX for an extended period, then revive. i'm not having a go at you, i'm just saying...

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:16 (twenty-two years ago)

There's your details. Anyone who even drops and email to Cambridge and tells them that they're against this is doing some good.

C-man

Well, as ever with animal rights types, I get a shiver from that statement -- they key word is 'even,' of course. As is well known, some 'activists' regard mere words as not enough and are quite willing to take their protest further into the realms of human-on-human violence. I'm not tarring Calum with that brush, but, why the word 'even'?

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:16 (twenty-two years ago)

i am afraid that on a public forum you are going to have to deal with freedom of speech, and people posting things that you find offensive or disapprove of.

hahaha, as if he didn't know!

stevem (blueski), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:18 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd have been more civil if someone hadn't flooded this with sick pictures.

If someone posted an anti-Nazi thread and assholes posted pics of concentration camps i think it might upset, you know...

P.S. Human on human violence? I wouldn't have anything to with that, but from what I've seen of undercover footage in these labs I don't exactly cry when I hear Brian Cass has been given a good thump to the head.

C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:19 (twenty-two years ago)

If you read my post I didn't say you were taking the piss, you were accusing someone else of taking the piss with no grounds for doing so. But if you want to go accusing people of things they haven't actually said when it's patently obvious that you are wrong, go right ahead. Just don't go round scratching your head and wondering why no-one takes you seriously.

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:23 (twenty-two years ago)

it may upset. this is correct. but i wonder, how are minds changed? is this a succesful tactic being pursued here? how many minds have you changed through calling people 'assholes' etc? perhaps it works in a larger field, im not sure. is there any evidence of people changing their minds through being attacked instead of persuaded? on the other hand, there is a certain cathartism to shouting at people, even knowing it wont change anything

also, can any parellels be drawn between those who are violent to vivisectionists in the name of saving animal life, and those who are violent to abortionist in the name of saving unborn life?

gareth (gareth), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought 28 days later was factually incorrect b/c it was, like, science fiction.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)

also interesting is the fact that animal rights is often seen as a 'politically correct' cause, which i think goes to prove that people only invoke the spectre of pc when they are opposed to it

gareth (gareth), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:25 (twenty-two years ago)

ALL ANIMALS MUST BE TORTURED TO DEATH AND FED TO COWS NOW NOW NOW NOW!!!!11!!!!!!!!!!! NOW

vive la vache, Monday, 12 January 2004 17:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't know why I assumed that Calum would infer that I meant "graphically violent" when I said "graphic".

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:30 (twenty-two years ago)

probably plenty of people agree w/you that this is pretty poor, but wtf do you expect, after drinking http://www.vietgrove.com/images/hatorade.gif on ppl all the time?

Plus, discussion of issues like this (eg vegetarianism, smoking vs non-smoking, stuff that gets ppl riled up)rarely goes well on mail lists and bbs'. The same freedom from real-life consequence that allows you to diss ppl w/o getting smacked down on the floor, as you know would happen irl, is what allows ppl to take the piss when you try to tell people what to think. I dunno, it seems obvious to me.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Posting graphic pictures of animals being tested on is one of the best ways I can think of to turn people against animal testing. (I'm on 56k and therefore haven't actually clicked the links).

Calling people 'assholes' or whatever is considerably less effective. The fact that most people here ARE probably against animal testing and you have managed to turn it into a massive struggle on your part is rather amusing.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:37 (twenty-two years ago)

kalum's kampf haha.

Angharienne Bradshaw (Angharienne Bradshaw), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:40 (twenty-two years ago)

"I'd have been more civil if someone hadn't flooded this with sick pictures."

erm, i didn't just mean on this thread calz. i meant that your posting history has made a serious discussion on this topic impossible - and the only way to fix that is to be nicer on ILX for a consistent period of time.

"History of my posts shows I'm DEADLY SERIOUS about this topic."

indeed. and so people are delighted to have something they can upset you with (I'm not particularly bothered).

again, i'm not having a go at you, i'm just saying.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Pashmina, Matt DC, and Kilian OTM.

This is a topic that deserves better than C-Man's inflamed rhetoric, and for that matter, the faux nonchalance of others who are probably only reacting to C-Man anyway.

Anyone up for it?

David A. (Davant), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:17 (twenty-two years ago)

did calum really think he'd get a decent debate about something he cares about? Act llike a FUCKING TWAT for weeks on end, then make a strike for something you care about - it's not the cleverest strategy, and makes anything genuinely heart felt seem as ingenuous as anything else.

unfortunately it makes it impossible to talk about subjects like this in public on ilx.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't think it's impossible to talk about this subject; it's just impossible to tlak about this subject WITH HIM.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I agree that 28 Days Later was shit.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:31 (twenty-two years ago)

i have not seen 28 days later, but Pete says it's shit, so I imagine it's probably got something going for it

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:32 (twenty-two years ago)

It would be nice if you'd try and engage this seriously then. I agree that flying off the handle is not positive but the pictures pissed me off, along with the irrelevant "hey, do you know how few black people get into Cambridge"? Like, yeah, I do - so let's not discuss any other problem ever until we sort that one out... kill all threads! Abort! Etc etc

But, sure, fire ahead if you want to take this one seriously, it would be welcome.

C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Nick, if you've not been laid yet and you really are starting to think like this then it just makes you sad and it's a discussion I'm not going to enter into. If you want to fuck a dolphin mate then be my guest.

C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 19:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I had sex on Saturday, actually. It was very nice.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 12 January 2004 19:52 (twenty-two years ago)

That poor dolphin.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 January 2004 19:53 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.coloring.ws/curiousgeorge/bpostercuriousgeorge.gif

dean! (deangulberry), Monday, 12 January 2004 19:54 (twenty-two years ago)

I R losing my shit more.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 12 January 2004 19:54 (twenty-two years ago)

I had sex on Saturday, actually. It was very nice.

bribe the guards at Seaworld, did you?

Kingfishee (Kingfish), Monday, 12 January 2004 19:59 (twenty-two years ago)

"I'll give you a tenner for ten minutes alone in the crustacean tank."

"£20 gets you half an hour."

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:01 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.schmoozeletter.com/schmoozeletter/assets/images/dwh-and-the-dolphin-small.jpg

"£20 gets you half an hour."

dean! (deangulberry), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:02 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.homestead.com/cajunzydeco/files/cruise.00.photos/dave.dolphin.jpg

"It was very nice."

dean! (deangulberry), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:04 (twenty-two years ago)

that guy up there is gunna make sure the dolphin takes care of its colon, right?

Kingfishee (Kingfish), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:15 (twenty-two years ago)

On bestiality -- as far as I know, when dolphins and humans have sex, it's just as likely (more likely?) that the dolphin initiated it!

I wasn't being facetious about the lab rats. I met that guy. his apartment was stacked with these cages, each of which contained a giant rat from hell. As the last link in an ALF chain (I'm assuming), he had no idea what to do with them. It was kind of funny and disturbing. But a genuine practical problem.

Re: bloodthirstyness. Dan, I was just contrasting that with the better parts of our nature, not actually implying that bloodlust was a part of animal experimentation. Having said that, however, in the stolen video tape from that head injury research, many of the researchers posed with brain injured monkeys, manipulating their limbs to simulate dancing. It was quite disturbing to watch their callousness (interestingly, the theft of this tape was one of the few instances in which a laboratory lost its research grant as a result of animal rights activism).

My own interest in this is that I used to know a number of activists, and it was my girlfriend at the time who received the incredibly harsh jail term. I'm not an activist myself, but it was an eye-opener to see the way the British establishment handled this issue. By nature, I'm a "shades-of-grey" type person, but I do think some pretty awful stuff goes on w/r/t our treatment of other animal species.

David A. (Davant), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't know if it's really right to equate "callousness" with "bloodlust".

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:35 (twenty-two years ago)

David - interesting you saw that footage. It comes from 1986, I cannot recall off hand the name of the person who was in charge of this experiment (it took place in a Chicago laboratory if memory serves me correctly) but he was banned from working with primates but (get this) now carries out the same experiments on pigs.

The interesting thing is that the people who broke into the lab were tipped off by a janitor and when the people at the science dept. realised what they had in their hands they asked the FBI to track them down as they knew the public should never learn of what was going on...

I think that all vivisection should be banned, it's morally reprehensible.

C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:55 (twenty-two years ago)

So are you.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:56 (twenty-two years ago)

So are Suede.

, Monday, 12 January 2004 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't know if it's really right to equate "callousness" with "bloodlust".

Yeah, you're probably right in general. But in this particular case, it was pretty much indistinguishable. We shouldn't be naive about these practises, anyway.

C-Man, I don't know enough about alternatives, but vivisection on the face of it sure doesn't make me feel too good. By definition, I imagine most people lie somewhere in between the zealots on both sides, and would welcome some genuine alternatives to using live animals (cell cultures? computer models?).

Also, the rhetoric on both sides needs to simmer down. It hasn't changed one iota since I knew these animal rights activists in the '80s, ffs! And PETA's public image over here is not entirely due to a hostile media spin. Like the ALF, they must share the blame there (i.e./ pic your battles, people).

David A. (Davant), Monday, 12 January 2004 21:26 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm actually anti-vivisection, i'm just very wary of the firebrand stuff that i see, which i think turns people against animal rights, rather than for (i think there is a large danger that animal rights people are seen as comparable to pro-life people, and i think an argument that could be won is being hampered by zealotry)

i also think that berating people for not agreeing with you converts no one. ever.

gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Here we are, decades later, millions of monkeys dead, and for what? Where's the cure for cancer? For AIDS?

There are other things apart from this that research is done for, often with great success. Better/safer medications for diabetes, for example - ONES THAT NO LONGER NEED TO USE ANIMAL BYPRODUCT. Funny, that.

Also C-Man, I have only one question whenever anyone brings up this topic - do you eschew ALL pharmaceuticals and other scientific treatments when you are ill because of this stance? If not, please explain how you reconcile being against animals in medical research vs you taking convenient advantage of "someone else" doing so.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:34 (twenty-two years ago)

PS: I'm anti vivisection too, but I've also worked briefly at a medical research school so have a reasonable idea of what goes on. Not all of it is nice, but I'd like to see anyone suggest alternatives.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Token seriousness: I agree with all this 'being a lunatic zealot only alienates people no matter how noble your intent' stuff entirely.

Now:

http://www.defeatism.co.uk/chimpinsuit.gif

Ferrrrrrg (Ferg), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:39 (twenty-two years ago)

"Also C-Man, I have only one question whenever anyone brings up this topic - do you eschew ALL pharmaceuticals and other scientific treatments when you are ill because of this stance?"

I don't purchase or use any medication that is from companies that still use animal models if that is what you are asking. And, yes, I've pissed my doctor off royally with that.

P.S. I'll get back to you on the diabetes thing but as far as I know animal models have not been used in many cases of finding cures for this, but I'd need to double check my facts.

C-Man (C-Man), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Fair enough, just thought I'd ask.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I guess I should add that if I had no choice in the matter and I was going to die unless I took something made by some company which, at that moment in my life, was all there was to offer me I would obviously take it... It's not like you'd have much chance in this (theoretical) situation.

C-Man (C-Man), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:48 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.poster.net/koons/koons-michael-jackson-and-bubbles-2102301.jpg

ModJ (ModJ), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 01:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Dear America:

What the everloving fuck?

Sincerely, Nate

nate detritus (natedetritus), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 01:41 (twenty-two years ago)

So what did I miss?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 02:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Jeff Koons

ModJ (ModJ), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 02:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh that's all right, then.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 02:38 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.planet-familyguy.com/characters/pics/evilmonkey_tn.jpg

Bob Shaw (Bob Shaw), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 10:30 (twenty-two years ago)

two weeks pass...
The monkey lab in Cambridge is now not going ahead due to restriction in security costs.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3432531.stm

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:01 (twenty-two years ago)

I find it pretty disturbing, actually - a small number of violent extremists can stop something like this, but a huge number of nonviolent protests couldn't stop the war.

caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:35 (twenty-two years ago)

The winning side is the one with (implied) violence, seemingly...

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:40 (twenty-two years ago)

the war is a much bigger and more important issue, the ratio was greater. apparently the abandonment of the lab hinders the development of effective treatments for Alzheimers, but i guess they would say that.

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Aaaah, but who is the real sick bastard.....

omg, Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:43 (twenty-two years ago)

which developed nation has the least opposition to animal experimentation? Given that reserach science is a pretty international pursuit, with the top researchers willing and able to relocate to other countries in the course of their career wouldn't it make sense for the lab to be located there?

MarkH (MarkH), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:44 (twenty-two years ago)

The winning side is the one with (implied) violence, seemingly...

That's what I fnd disturbing.

caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:45 (twenty-two years ago)

claim that monkeys have WMDs on a few issues of the daily express or something and then they'll be queuing up to donate monkeys to the labs for the greater goods of humanity.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 12:06 (twenty-two years ago)

three years pass...

Best Calum thread ever

Dom Passantino, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:11 (eighteen years ago)

28 months later

That one guy that quit, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:15 (eighteen years ago)

I actually care more about the fact that amongst an intakle of 11,000 Cambridge University currently contains just 74 black students.
-- Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, January 12, 2004 4:49 PM (3 years ago) Bookmark Link

75 now.

That one guy that quit, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:15 (eighteen years ago)

Lewis Hamilton has truly changed the world

Dom Passantino, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:15 (eighteen years ago)

black people hate Cambridge.

Grandpont Genie, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:18 (eighteen years ago)

Massachusetts?

C J, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:19 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.mtv.com/news/photos/g/grammy06/parties/goodmusic-kanye.jpg

Dom Passantino, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:20 (eighteen years ago)

Kanye's printer needs new ink

Dom Passantino, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:21 (eighteen years ago)

Best Calum thread ever

-- Dom Passantino, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:11 (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

RONG. Sleeper thread on ilm w/calum/julio epic flamewar or MSP thread (not started by cman admittedly) w/unbelivable stfu-pwnj of cman by ally are better.

Pashmina, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:21 (eighteen years ago)

The problem with that thread is that although Calum gets pwnd, he gets pwnd by someone advocating MSP as a great band

Dom Passantino, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:24 (eighteen years ago)

You may be on shaky ground yourself a bit with that assertion, Dom.

Pashmina, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:26 (eighteen years ago)

calum never mentioned pazz and jop as far as i'm aware

acrobat, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:28 (eighteen years ago)

"If you want to fuck a dolphin mate then be my guest"

LOLOLO

I used jimmy mod's "makes yacking hand motion" thing on a mail list a couple of times a year or so ago and got the smackdown from the list moderator for it, haha.

Pashmina, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:31 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.