where exactly are shoreditch/hoxton, and dalston/kingsland

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
1. shoreditch and hoxton seem interchangeable on maps and in usage now. i'm presuming this started after the yuppiefication of 1995 onwards?

i'd understood hoxton to be north of old st up to the canal? eastern flank as kingsland road, west as new north rd? does it extend above the canal, or is that immediately de beauvoir? it feels as though the first few streets (until you get to downham rd) would count as hoxton?

and shoreditch? the triangle below old st? any further east and thats spitalfields no? but the tube on brick lane is called shoreditch, you would have thought 'brick lane' or 'spitalfields' would have been a better name?

2. where exactly is kingsland? it feels like one of those areas that is getting squeezed out of existence (a la brownswood park or shacklewell). dalston seems to stand in for it now. dalston is east and south east of the A10? which makes kingsland south of balls pond, and west of kingsland road, east of southgate road? but how far down? becomes de beauvoir pretty quick. can it really be just those few streets?

interesting how areas change, does anyone have any oldmaps of these areas?

ed and mark s to thread

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 12 December 2002 21:13 (twenty-three years ago)

I only learnt about the existence of Dalston last month. I was taken in a taxi there. Upon arrival, I asked my friend, "Where the hell are we?" "Dalston," he said flatly, as if was the most obvious place to be. I said, "Fine, but where the hell is Dalston?"

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Thursday, 12 December 2002 21:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Hoxton I think is a subset of Shoreditch. The borough, as was, was Shoreditch. I think the name Shoreditch predates Hoxton but I'm not sure how the name Hoxton came about, I assume from a settlement here. Shoreditch appears to spring from a river or stream, long since gone. Its too far east to be covered by my history of Clerkenwell and Finsbury and all off the maps are cut off before they reach that far. A trip to the library might be in order.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 12 December 2002 21:30 (twenty-three years ago)

As for Dalston I'm on safer ground here. Kingsland I think refers to some woodland used by various mediaeval kings for hunting. I think as an extension to Epping forest. Its not really the area of Dalston. I've never actually heard anyone refer to anywhere as Kingsland. The Staion is called Kingsland to differentiate it from the now defunct Dalston junction, however I don't thing they were ever open concurrently.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 12 December 2002 21:34 (twenty-three years ago)

...and the other side of the imaginary stream is called Houndsditch.

Hoxton covers the area north of Old Street to the top of Hoxton Street and no further east than Hackney Road; Shoreditch has the warehouse/ex-pub architecture and includes the estate around Arnold Circus. I call the area west of Pitfeld Street part of St Luke's; it seems distinct from Hoxton. Brick Lane is part of Spitalfields and Spitalfields ends when E1 switches to E2 on street signs, eg. near the beigel bake. East of Brick Lane is Stepney (southeast) or Bethnal Green (northeast).

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 12 December 2002 21:45 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd have made Shoreditch stretch rather farther north than Old Street - maybe to (looks at map) North Rd/Fanshaw Street. I note that Haggerston is not getting a mention! I have never heard it mentioned anywhere, I think!

Kingsland can't start until you get North of Beauvoir Square - I think it's Kingsland Road and East thereof between that square and the Balls Pond Road, maybe even up to the station.

Can we pin down the distinction between Shacklewell, which has little more existence than Haggerston, and Stoke Newington? I ask because my girlf lives in Stoke Newington, but it's a close thing - Evering Road as the divider, maybe? Do we need a thread on areas people never refer to in directions, or live in?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 12 December 2002 21:47 (twenty-three years ago)

shacklewell has almost completely disappeared (as has hornsey, not the N8 hornsey, but another stoke newington subsection)...haggerston is still distinct, between kingsland rd and hackney rd up to the canal (although it becomes cambridge heath somewhere to the west...)

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 12 December 2002 21:55 (twenty-three years ago)

East of kingsland rd and when dalston finishes is. London Fields and Hackney Proper. Haggerston lies between, Shoreditch, Bethnal Green, and London Fields and cambridge heath, it is not very distinct other than round Haggerston park and I guess down columbia rd. Or at least these are how they lie in my imagination. Debauvoir runs between St Pauls Rd and Balls Pond Rd, and between Kingsland and Southgate Rd.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 12 December 2002 21:56 (twenty-three years ago)

if de beauvoir runs all the way to balls pond and st pauls then that means kingsland does not exist!!! its marked on current maps as being just north of de beauvoir, around stamford rd...

also, whats the ku with all these disappearing places?

gareth (gareth), Thursday, 12 December 2002 22:01 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll have to show you the original plans for DeBeauvoir some day. My dad has a street plan for the devlopment.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 12 December 2002 22:06 (twenty-three years ago)

i lost my heart in shacklewell :(

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 12 December 2002 22:44 (twenty-three years ago)

in a few years time it will all make a lot more sense...

http://www.base58.com/misc/hoxditch.gif


but they're getting rid of Shoreditch tube station (is it actually in Shoreditch anyway?) so maybe you're back to square one there

stevem (blueski), Friday, 13 December 2002 01:35 (twenty-three years ago)

what is this new tube line going to be called? And where does it go at the other end? Why was I not informed about this, Mr Livingstone?

MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 13 December 2002 09:38 (twenty-three years ago)

"Kingsland I think refers to some woodland used by various mediaeval kings for hunting"

I presume it was quite a wide area, because apparently Henry VIII used to stay in a place by Newington Green. And King Henry's Walk is obviously where he'd take his strolls.

Shacklewell may be disappearing (I presume it's just Shacklewell Rd basically now) but I think it's one of the longer established settlements in the area. Haven't got my old Stokey and area map on me at the mo to check though.

James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 13 December 2002 09:58 (twenty-three years ago)

That new tube line is the East London Line extension.

http://www.thetube.com/content/faq/ell.jpg

See also here

Ed (dali), Friday, 13 December 2002 10:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Did I mention I'm (kind of) working for Ken Livingstone at the moment? He came to talk to everyone last week, but I wasn't invited, cos I'm only here for a few weeks...

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Friday, 13 December 2002 10:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Steve, where did you get that map fragement from?

RickyT (RickyT), Friday, 13 December 2002 10:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Just moving slightly northwards, it's struck me that there's a massive overlap between Stoke Newington and Stamford Hill. Obviously the fact that Stamford Hill the road (Dick Turpin's favourite hunting ground) starts in Stoke Newington, by Stoke Newington station. Then there's the fact that people see 'N16' as being synonymous with Stoke Newington but it actually stretches right the way up to Amhurst Park Rd, so encompassing roads like 'East Bank' and 'West Bank' which are surely 'Stamford Hill'.

I guess estate agents are going to describe anywhere remotely near as Stokey, but in reality where does Stoke Newington end and Stamford Hill start?

James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 13 December 2002 10:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Where Stamford Hill the road does (East Back, West Bank etc are well north of this)

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 13 December 2002 10:24 (twenty-three years ago)

But that'd mean Stoke Newington railway station wasn't in Stoke Newington. Also, I think of Manor Road as being much more Stoke Newington than Stamford Hill.

And the East Bank sorting office calls itself Stoke Newington too.

James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 13 December 2002 10:30 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, the road starts just where the station is, as you said, so it's on the boundary. And stations have a habit of being named oddly.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 13 December 2002 10:34 (twenty-three years ago)

actually, it appears, by looking at an early 1800s map, that kingsland was north of balls pond also, which would make it a slightly larger area.

interestingly, essex road wasnt called this then, the southern part was called "lower street" and the northern part was also part of balls pond road (at this time holloway road was called highgate road)

gareth (gareth), Friday, 13 December 2002 11:55 (twenty-three years ago)

Obsolete names for bits of London rock! (haha I live in Bellenden).

Suzy, if South East of Brick Lane = Stepney, where's Whitechapel? (Also Brick Lane / Spitalfields = site of the Whitechapel murders, yesno?)

Tim (Tim), Friday, 13 December 2002 12:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Steve, where did you get that map fragement from?

i made it myself cos i am sad, shhhh

stevem (blueski), Friday, 13 December 2002 12:06 (twenty-three years ago)

kingsland was north of balls pond also

That would be because of the Henry VIII Newington Green thing. (He stayed there and then went on his hunting sorties around the King's Land.)

James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 13 December 2002 12:07 (twenty-three years ago)

isn't hoxton so called because hoxton st/hoxton square? (don't you DARE get those two mixed up, or you will arouse the ire of locals) is that a really dumb answer? and doesn't entirely make sense, because apparently, before WWII bombing, pitfield st was the main thoroughfair of hoxton, not hoxton st at all.

brick lane has never traditionally been shoreditch. this misnomer only arose in the past century, because the shoreditch tube station was mysteriously built in spitalfields. i wonder how many of these neighbourhood names have been altered/created/disappeared because of tube station naming...

kingsland was originally much larger, Beauvoir is a modern (for london) development within said neighbourhood.

(yes, my crazy old landlady was obsessed with hoxton/shoreditch, despite the fact she was transplanted there from hampshire... she had survey maps of the locality dating back to the 1700's. i used to stare at them for hours, intrigued by how the neighbourhood changed... especially post-WWII)

kate, Friday, 13 December 2002 12:14 (twenty-three years ago)

I was delighted when a local informed me that De Beauvoir Town is properly pronounced Dee Beaver Town.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 13 December 2002 12:22 (twenty-three years ago)

the bus maps put barins st/rosemary branch as hoxton, but this doesnt seem quite right to me, but if they are not hoxton, where are they?

also, shoreditch park, is way up by the canal, in what i would have called hoxton, and not shoreditch, but then i suppose this could have been to do with the old borough of shoreditch

gareth (gareth), Friday, 13 December 2002 12:30 (twenty-three years ago)

shoreditch park is MODERN, it is post-WWII bomb damage. it is definitely in hoxton, despite being called shoreditch. they couldn't call it hoxton park, because that is the body of potted greenery in hoxton square.

i wouldn't call rosemary branch hoxton, it's JUST on the wrong side of the canal by about ten feet. but it's in that weird triangle around the new north road that isn't quite islington but isn't quite hoxton either. (though they seem to think of themselves as hoxton for some reason or other.)

kate, Friday, 13 December 2002 12:38 (twenty-three years ago)

I used to live on Southgate Road, just north of the Rosemary Branch but NEVER described myself as Hoxton. That would've been way too pretentious. We used to just say Islington, more towards the Dalston end.

James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 13 December 2002 12:48 (twenty-three years ago)

ha, thats what we say! we're quite a bit further up the southgate road tho

gareth (gareth), Friday, 13 December 2002 12:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I had friends who were firm Shacklewell livers, they were on the sounth side of the Evering Road - so that's where I place it area wise. Of course these boundaries MEAN NOTHING.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 13 December 2002 12:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Gareth - are you near the row of shops?

It always makes me laugh when I pass the Northgate now. I get the impression it's a bit of a gastro pub now but when we were there it was the Dog & Dumpling and it was FUCKING AWFUL. So bad it was funny.

James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 13 December 2002 12:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Gareth likes maps so here is Streetmap.co.uk: Hoxton centred on Hoxton Square.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Friday, 13 December 2002 13:21 (twenty-three years ago)

the big grey district names for both hoxton AND shoreditch are in completely the wrong places on that map...

hey, my old flat is almost right in the centre, though. ::shudders::

kate, Friday, 13 December 2002 13:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Steve - from the point of view of a SE Londoner I can't see why anyone in their right mind working in town and living in Forest Hill or Sydenham, let alone Croydon, would want to get that Tube line into town when there's quite a good rail network that would get you there in at least half the time.

Unless, of course, you travel from Penge to Dalston on a regular basis, in which case its a lifesaver.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 13 December 2002 14:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Matt, maybe so - i personally cant work out how the ELL will extend to West Croydon if its going to run on the existing Railtrack network..how will this work? there's only one from New Cross Gate to Norwood isnt there?

similarly, the Silverlink already connects Willesden Junction with Islington, Dalston etc. so why bother extending the ELL that way too, on the same track? tho it looks like Primrose Hill might get its own tube station which is kinda cool

stevem (blueski), Friday, 13 December 2002 14:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Would it not be useful to a lot of SE Londoners who work in the Bishopsgate area who currently travel into London Bridge and then have to bus/walk/tube the rest of the way?

David (David), Friday, 13 December 2002 14:19 (twenty-three years ago)

also, the ELL extension is not designed for taking 'into town' - the whole point is that you can travel AROUND the city on the tube without having to go into it...they decided this was necessary somehow but yeh its a bit hard to see why at times

stevem (blueski), Friday, 13 December 2002 14:20 (twenty-three years ago)

similarly, the Silverlink already connects Willesden Junction with Islington, Dalston etc. so why bother extending the ELL that way too, on the same track?

Cobbling together a new 'tube' line mostly from existing overground track is cheap(er) but still ends up looking like some kind of prestigious grand scheme?

David (David), Friday, 13 December 2002 14:24 (twenty-three years ago)

they're also planning deep underground fast trains to connect KIngs Cross with Victoria and then Surrey/Berkshire AND another one to connect Paddington with Liverpool Street and Essex...soon they'll be more trains on tracks then cars on roads, thats Prescott's plan it seems

stevem (blueski), Friday, 13 December 2002 14:31 (twenty-three years ago)

more trains on tracks than cars on roads = URGENT AND KEY and very much to be encouraged.

kate, Friday, 13 December 2002 14:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Ah, I'm glad I used to live in Hoxton (as this thread has clarified). The Square and the Park always did get me confused...

Gordon (Gordon), Friday, 13 December 2002 14:38 (twenty-three years ago)

A very informative site about London's proposed transport schemes and stuff.

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 13 December 2002 14:53 (twenty-three years ago)

A very informative site about London's proposed transport schemes and stuff.

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 13 December 2002 14:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Gareth - are you near the row of shops?

It always makes me laugh when I pass the Northgate now

bit further up than the row of shops, but yes, the northgate is my local, and yes, it is now a gastropub, i heard about its former life...

gareth (gareth), Friday, 13 December 2002 16:10 (twenty-three years ago)

one month passes...
i did a bit of a walk on saturday afternoon actually. i walked down de beauvoir road, whitmore road and pitfield st, and then back up hoxton st, hyde road and bridport place back onto southgate road. hoxton is GRIM!

i knew it was anyway, but usually i just go down either kingsland or new north road, not actually into it. theres a lot of it too! i always thought of it as trustafarians and slumming it designers at the bottom with locals at the top, which i guess is true, but i hadnt realised how much 'top' there is. all the wasteground around the colville estate and a bit further down, looks really fucking dodgy. i can only assume that when people mean 'hoxton' they actually mean either shoreditch, or a few yards in any direction from hoxton park? because it gets grim pretty quickly when you go north!

gareth (gareth), Monday, 27 January 2003 14:19 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah the estates north of the canal (hoxton/de beauvoir borderline) are pretty hardcore: my sister used to work there and her boss had his car stolen, joyrided for what amounted to 120 yards, and torched!! (it's ok bcz he wz a total prick)

the office next to hers had a great impenetrable steel door, so the burglars went through the breezeblock wall with hammers

south towards the city and west towards barbican are no comparison

mark s (mark s), Monday, 27 January 2003 14:27 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.