― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 17:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 17:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 17:39 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 17:45 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 17:49 (twenty-three years ago)
as far as both leeds and bowyer are concerned it is ridiculuos, only a matter of months since leeds could have got £9m and bowyer could have been at liverpool!
― gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 19:51 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 19:51 (twenty-three years ago)
― robin carmody (robin carmody), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 20:24 (twenty-three years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 20:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― robin carmody (robin carmody), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 20:56 (twenty-three years ago)
if i was roeder, i would have bought him
― gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 21:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 22:08 (twenty-three years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Thursday, 9 January 2003 00:32 (twenty-three years ago)
I think at the very least, he's a thoroughly nasty piece of work; his stuff about quibbling over the fine Leeds were going to levy upon him after the trial, backing out of the Liverpool deal, only signing for six months (so in effect, it's a 6 month loan from Leeds to West Ham upon conclusion of which he's a free agent).
― Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 9 January 2003 00:59 (twenty-three years ago)