― Chris P (Chris P), Saturday, 11 January 2003 03:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 11 January 2003 03:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 11 January 2003 03:52 (twenty-three years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 11 January 2003 04:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 11 January 2003 04:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― Curtis Stephens, Saturday, 11 January 2003 04:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― Douglas (Douglas), Saturday, 11 January 2003 04:29 (twenty-three years ago)
If I had to name a long poem in English that really works for me, I'd have to reach back Beowulf.
― Aimless, Saturday, 11 January 2003 04:32 (twenty-three years ago)
Aimless: Except that I think there's something different between, say, a sonnet and the Maximus poems. There are some longer poems that start out really great in the way we often admire short poems but eventually fizzle, and those are disappointing (I'm thinking Don Juan or even Paradise Lost here) but I suspect long poems, or at least the post-Cantos long poems, seek out a different sort of appreciation than short poems or prose.
Search: In recent years, Ron Silliman's Alphabet and Kenneth Goldsmith's No. 111.
― Chris P (Chris P), Saturday, 11 January 2003 05:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 11 January 2003 11:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Saturday, 11 January 2003 19:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― mohamad abdi, Monday, 29 March 2004 10:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mr Mime (Andrew Thames), Monday, 29 March 2004 10:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 29 March 2004 10:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Monday, 29 March 2004 11:26 (twenty-two years ago)