London, classic or dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
It is obvious from the NYC thread, we need to explore this topic in further detail! I have a friend who things everything English is just BETTER and he's a NYer since birth. All his favorite bands, clothes, etc. are English. He's fixated, obsessed! So...?

Nude Spock, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

London itself: classic.
London prices: dud.

DG, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

this city stuff is stupid, stupid stupid. its so irritating. You can have a great time in any city it depends what you're doing and I know I'm not going to let where I live change that. No city is better or worse just different. Different culture, nightlife, people etc, please please no more of these.

Ronan, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Well despite what Dave said on the NYC CoD thread I live in London / am a Londoner and am not full of rage and spite. I am quite cheerful really and so are my friends in London. I wuv it and wouldn't want to live anywhere else right now.

Emma, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Your friend is far too much of an Anglophile...um...me old china. Er, yeah.

Having visited a number of times now, I do enjoy it the more I get familiar with it -- a mix of up, down and all around. Classic example of where I think it has LA beat (though apparently not NYC) is the transit system -- as I never tire of telling people, Jane complains about it but I think it's just frigging amazing just because you *have* the damn thing. Grass is greener or something. And thanks to her, her friends and the FT/ILx crew I've discovered all sorts of places to go, hang out, have a drink, do record or book shopping, etc., all useful things when visiting a city, I think. ;-) If only it had LA's weather. *sigh*

Ned Raggett, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

London is classic. i read recently that, apparently, there are some english people who don't live here. i offer my condolences.

gareth, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Ronan, do you mean to say you could have a good time in a Macedonian refugee camp as well? Because that would be about the same as this crumbling entropic abattoir of a city, which boasts more drunken thugs and coke-addled media arseholes per square inch than anywhere in Europe, possibly Earth.

Although, on days when I don't actually have to work, I quite enjoy the place for just wandering aimlessly, you find something new all the time. Every tube stop seems like a different country, which is good, you can escape without escaping. Also, I don't think I could ever live in a monocultural city ever again after living here, it would seem so arid and dull in comparison.

If ILE is to be remembered through the ages, it's most stunning achievement may be that it induced me to say something nice about London. What's happening to me...

dave q, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I just hated the New York thing, I mean does it really matter where you live, it's such an insignificant and often uncontrollable thing.

Ronan, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dave, i take it back about you being predictable

gareth, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

London is a sprawling shambling monster - it's like a treasure trove, full of surprises, not a single living person can ever have London sussed because it's constantly evolving, and it's impossible to run out of things to do.

Just a shame it's the second most expensive city in the world to live in (to Tokyo)... and the public transport system's crap... and the pubs close five hours too early. And I get tired of always having to leave a club early to get the last train back to suburbia.

Apart from that, classic.

Trevor, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

London. Spent 13 years there, so I should feel some sort of loyalty or fondness, but don't. Maybe because I'm a Scot, and Scots are wandering souls who see London as a necessary evil, a point of embarkation, an imperial capital of an occupying power, whatever.

Things I'd suggst to improve London:

- Get over Punk, London, and contribute something other than sneery sexless amphetamine aggression to world culture.

- Design London public transport so that it works, please, UK Government. (Fat chance.)

- Demolish British pubs, London suburbs, any and all monuments connected with Royal Family.

- Take popular entertainment (tabloids, broadcasting) out of the hands of the Oxbridge and put it into the hands of - why not? - the people.

- Don't do things in half measures, London! All those Japanese exhibitions and matsuris you had this summer? Just import Tokyo building by building, bicycle by bicycle, and populate it with Japanese art students.

Momus, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I mean does it really matter where you live, it's such an insignificant and often uncontrollable thing

for me, surroundings are very important. i came to london, because london rocks and is much better than bradford, which doesn't. at some point in the future i will jettison london and go to new york. but, not for a while yet, because london is too ace

gareth, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Anyone trying to demolish London pubs will have to drive their bulldozer over me first.

Emma, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

If they're using dynamite would they have to buy a bulldozer for you?

Ronan, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No, I have one already, I keep it with my hammer and 2 screwdrivers. I would like a Black & Decker cordless drill for Christmas.

Emma, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The only reason I voted in Ken Livingstone as mayor was because he promised to install a tram system that ran from the centre of London to my bed. If he doesn't fulfill his promise soon, come the next election I'm voting for Dobbo.

Trevor, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Just import Tokyo building by building, bicycle by bicycle, and populate it with Japanese art students.

I think Disney has the rights to that franchise.

FWIW, Jane the Glorious (and Scottish) would love to live/work elsewhere, though the main reason simply is the cost of living rather than because of what London is.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I can get you one of them, you just have to buy a million or so litres of oil.

Ronan, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

best and worst parts of london

gareth, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"Demolish British pubs, London suburbs"
Oh please, not all of us have the means to live anywhere trendy and urban, you know. There's nothing wrong with the suburbs.

DG, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i like london very much and couldn't really see myself living anywhere else. sure, there's about a million things wrong with it - the tubes are rubbish, it's dirty, the people are often rude, and it is way too expensive. but i just feel at home here - very much in the "maybe it's because i'm a Londoner" vein, i'm afraid. the point raised earlier about surroundings being important is true - these are *my* surroundings. London has such a huge sense of history and yet feels very modern at the same time - whatever kind of mood you're in, you can always find something to do. i have a constant sense of guilt that, despite this, i usually end up staying in bed though... i bet i don't know half as much about it as most tourists.

katie, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh, and tell White Van Man that it's not very amusing for me to hear him shouting 'Aye, aye!' every time he sees me wearing my eye patch. Only happens in London. In other cities it's only kids under 8 who say 'Look, Ma, a pirate!'

Momus, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Why not tell him yourself next time you're here?

DG, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

You could just wear a pirate hat and nobody would ask any questions. Perhaps.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Momus - why rely on the tired old "amphetamine aggression = sexless" thing? Not everybody grooves to Barry White, you know!

dave q, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

London: more overpriced than overrated. Characteristic shared with Tokyo and NYC. White Van Man exists everywhere, in NYC he is Street Corner Man, in the Midwest he is Pickup Truck Man and shouts 'nice hair'. But shoes are cheaper here, high street clothes are nice and nowhere in Europe is more than 3 hours away. If I want good vintage I'll go to my friend's warehouse in Minneapolis and nab it before the Japanese do.

I think London needs alternatives to both punks and stupid fucking hippies, neither of which are sexy. At least I am actually in a position to do something about this. Or if I'm feeling sinister, I have been known to launch fake trends to trap fashion vitims.

suzy, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dave, are you telling me those threshing, gobbing, pogoing punks, 90% male, deeply neurotic, dressed in bin liners, happy to agree with Lydon that sex was 'two and a half minutes of squelching noises', poised on the cusp of turning Punk into the semi-fascist Oi, were in fact warm- blooded mammals just trying, in their way, to 'get it on' with the opposite sex?

Momus, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't see any reason why that particular form of tribal flag-waving so as to attract others to them would be different or have a different purpose than any other, actually.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I was almost not going to get drawn and then Momus had to post his damn stupid quarter of a thought piece. If Ally = NYC then I = London and you mess with my city I'll mess with you.

First things first, a city is defined by the things which are wrong with it. London Transport I think is fucking marvellous considering the number of people it has to cope with and even after twenty year of underfunding it is remarkable. What Dave said above is the key point of London - every Tube station is a new territory. You may sneer (and sneer you did Nick) at suburbia but London does not have one bland suburban belt. London's suburnia is an extraordinary rich thing which starts on the edge of zone 1 and stretches for a fifteen mile radius. Plump me in Sutton and I would notice the difference from Barnet without even opening my eyes.

We've been here before but suffice to say this city never fails to suprise, excite or disappoint me. I'm even slowly coming round to the licencing thing. Let NYC be the city that never sleeps. London soon will be the only city which does sleep. To sleep perchance....

If I dreamt - I would dream of London.

Pete, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

And the rationale behind licensing is, Pete...?

Even prim old Scotland is passing new legislation extending legal drinking hours past midnight. (And they've reverted to state grants for further education rather than the iniquitous English loans system).

Meanwhile, lucky London has just had another 450 CCTV cameras approved. Citizen surveillance, coming soon to a lamp-post near you!

Momus, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The rationale is that in a city like London you can always get a drink. It might not be easy, but hell that's a right of passage. If we were to pop nice shiny Japanese buildings into London it stops being London, and starts being the town that Momus likes. The point of big cities is that they are resilient and cannot be wholesale changed by one planner, one mayor or even one government despite their good intentions. And on that front there is no more organic city than London.

The licence thing: it is not uniquely a London problem. Also bear in mind that I am a licencee who likes knowing when he can go to bed. As I said - I can always get a drink.

Pete, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The rationale behind the licensing laws is that they were a good idea in World War One to stop those in armament factories turning up to work drunk/hungover (in theory), but it seems the government forgot to repeal them. There are moves to dump them in the near future though.
As for the CCTV cameras, I really don't care. NO-ONE is watching me, 'they' don't care. Besides, I didn't hear anyone moaning when they were used to catch David Copeland, the fellow who let off nailbombs across London and killed three (wasn't it?) in a pub on Old Compton Street.

DG, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"Two and a half minutes"? Christ, what am I, Superman on Viagra?

dave q, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Momus says: >>> Take popular entertainment (tabloids, broadcasting) out of the hands of the Oxbridge and put it into the hands of - why not? - the people.

'The people'? I don't think this is that helpful. Who, in a capitalist society, are 'the people'? They're not, as far as I can see, a salt-of-the-earth bunch who'll make everything OK - they're everybody, good and bad, in all their complexity. They don't have a single point of view, and they don't really have a single pair of 'hands' into which something like 'popular entertainment' can be put. So how is the idea to be executed?

I may be be barking up the wrong tree here, somewhat. But any talk of giving things 'back to the people' sounds rather like populism of the manipulative (cos hard-to-argue-against) 'People's Princess' variety.

the pinefox, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

London is okay. As soon as I am rich enough I'm leaving.

jel, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

london = classic & dud

(IMO) nice to visit, but gimme Bilbao, Plzn, Edinburgh or Nijmegen instead.

rest of UK's cities = multicultural too, believe it or not.

Total concentration of brit arts/media/political power in london = probably the most stupid, fucked-up & DUD thing about this country right now, and, sad to say, for the forseeable future.

xoxo

|\|0|2/|\4|\| |=4'/, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I live near King's Cross. Trust me, CCTV cameras are about as much an infringement on personal liberty as those 'Drug Users Will Be Prosecuted!' signs in clubs, for all the effect they have.

I think the amount of speed bumps is getting ridiculous, though.

dave q, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Speed bumps = dud.

DG, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Destroy: The Antelope off King's Road in Chelsea. The proprietor is a cunt.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

CCTV cameras = all empty
Fantasy archeology of the future: puzzled alienZoR — for we will have exited earlier, inadvertently — fast-forwarding thru millions of feet of video-tape of corridors where NOTHING EVER HAPPENS!!

mark s, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

In which case, to borrow one of David Byrne's pithier lines, the aliens will therefore conclude we lived in heaven.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

London is classic because you can happily walk for miles and take it all in, never getting bored. Tube prices are too high but like Pete says the actual system isn't that bad. M4 speed limits/bus lane's a bastard, though.

Bill, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The Scottish Parliament is far more progressive than the Westminster one because the Tories are the fourth party in Scotland, behind three left-of-centre parties. In England unfortunately they are still the second party and therefore still have elements of their old power to quash progressive legislation at birth, when they feel like it. The Celtic fringes (i.e. Scotland, Wales and Cornwall) contain one Tory MP (up from none in 1997) and that MP is in the far south of Scotland, just over the border from England, with a majority of 74 votes. Says it all, surely?

London is to me Classic for all sorts of predictable reasons relating to its history and cultural vitality and depth of humanity, and Dud for the reasons Norman gave: excessive concentration of media there and attitudes of arrogant assumed superiority towards the rest of the UK.

Robin Carmody, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I get scared in London at night for fear of falling through a TIME WARP and ending up in ye olden days.

DG, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Jeez, your tube is a model of efficiency compared to our chugga chugga choo choo. I like how they tell you when a train is coming. They can't do that in Chicago because that would mean having to acknowledge that 3 minutes actually equals 10 minutes in Chicago time. I never had to wait very long when I was in London.

Kerry, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Kerry, you are clearly blotting out having to wait for the Northern Line! You can sit there looking at the indicator which advertises a wait of three minutes, it whittles down to one minute and suddenly flashes CORRECTION a bunch. Then the train you thought was arriving at the platform suddenly isn't for another 10 minutes. This taunting can go on for at least 30 minutes if you're unlucky on a Sunday.

For speed of trains I love Paris; they're so frequent I've never seen them crowded. Nor have I ever been hassled by late-night drunks.

suzy, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

London = better than NYC cos 1) no grid system (therefore more randomness and private cartographic opportunities) 2)connected to this: though older, it doesn't feel like such an over-scripted place. Funny how most interesting recent stuff out of NYC (Wu Tang Clan, Antibalas, Daytrippers, Sopranos, Jonathan Lethem) all comes from/ deals with the boroughs. Manhattan (yes, even the Lower East Side) is culturally dead, still sentimentally sucking off the withered phallus of late 70s punk/ early 80s hip-hop scene - cf. dewy-eyed but impotent adoration of Downtown 81 3) London's not as ruthlessly and lazily segmented into 'downtown'/ gallery zones 4) Its geography is not as racially bifurcated 5) Books (tho' not records) are cheaper 6) Better radio/ theatre/ television/ fashion 7) You can better American records in London than NYC (compare and contrast, say, Rough Trade to Other Music on East 4th: the latter have barely heard of Lambchop etc and have only belatedly started stocking a modicum of soul/ funk/ reggae - all of them imports from Soul Jazz/ Strut etc)

Oh, and re subways - London's at least covers a lot of the city whereas the NYC one (no escalators or elevators making travel hell for families and old people) shirks SO much territory. London's licensing laws may be crap but you don't need to be 21 to drink and can do so openly in the streets unlike the ridiculous hypocrisy of waddling around with a brown paper bag. As for CCTV - has Momus been to areas such as Washington Square where the lamps all have cameras hidden in them?

s, Friday, 31 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The problem with London is there's TOO MANY families and old people. I'd prefer it if there were none.

dave q, Saturday, 1 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

ss4 - no grid system (therefore more randomness does not compute. grids open up all kinds of happenstance. if anything the psychogeography of new york plays a much larger role in people's daily lives because the grid means you have to make it all up yourself.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

but Tracer- that's the British, if something isn't imposed on them from above they have NO FUCKING IDEA what to do, except maybe get drunk and whinge and hit someone. (Which is why they'll never have a revolution)

dave q, Monday, 3 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

You could head to Camden, which is about a half hour walk from Euston, and probably find a pub or club which won't kick you out till 3 or so...

chap, Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:33 (sixteen years ago)

you could hang out in the stairwell of my council block, smoking weed and gobbing for Britain with the local hoodies. it's just round the corner from Euston. and cheap.

show us yer slime (gnarly sceptre), Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:33 (sixteen years ago)

failing that, you might prefer the 24 hour Starbucks at St Pancras

show us yer slime (gnarly sceptre), Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:34 (sixteen years ago)

I wouldn't reccomend Euston area at that time of night. You'd be better off heading towards Shoreditch which is really only 15 minute walk from the Barbican (so long as you don't get lost *in* the Barbican) - christ, it's been so long since I did all night London I can't really remember. But that's more clubbing kind of nightlife. My memory is that things there tend to be free on a Tuesday to get the punters in, but that's 5 years out of date and based on stumbling out of Mother at 4am.

Soho coffee bars? Do they still exist in a 24 hour capacity?

Evren Kader (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:35 (sixteen years ago)

Oh! There is that early morning breadkfast pub around Smithfields for the market, isn't there?

Evren Kader (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:35 (sixteen years ago)

(Sorry, I'll be going to the gig but taking off sharpish after it, as I have to work early the next morning. Unless you want some floor space for a few hours - but I live out in Zone 3.)

Evren Kader (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:36 (sixteen years ago)

24 hour Starbucks at St Pancras

This sounds like a very strong contender. I'm not a clubbing guy, more looking to settle down and wait out the hours somehow.

krakow, Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:37 (sixteen years ago)

Thanks Evren Kader, very kind of you, but I'll probably stick to the centre given that it's such an early train.

krakow, Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:38 (sixteen years ago)

Ah, yes! There are still 24 hour coffee shops in Soho. This place is a landmark. (way better coffee than Starbucks as well)

http://www.qype.co.uk/place/144121-Bar-Italia-London

Evren Kader (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:39 (sixteen years ago)

There is that early morning breadkfast pub around Smithfields for the market, isn't there?

That's The Hope. Unfortunately it doesn't open until 6am so not much use here.

This might provide a few suggestions though, although dismally few for one of the biggest cities in the world.

Tuncay Stryder (Matt DC), Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:40 (sixteen years ago)

Aaah, Tinseltown is the place I was thinking of.

Tuncay Stryder (Matt DC), Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:42 (sixteen years ago)

I did this once after a gig and ended up sleeping on a bench by the river. Kept getting hassled by some missionary guy who wanted me to come to his church for a cup of tea and a chat about the direction my life was taking.

Peinlich Manoeuvre (NickB), Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:43 (sixteen years ago)

there's always... THE SPANISH BAR ....

(words that strike terror into the heart of any dedicated weeknight London drinker)

Evren Kader (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:44 (sixteen years ago)

Here's the St Pancreas Starbucks, which does claim 24 hour opening: http://www.stpancras.com/retailers/coffee-houses/starbucks/

I'd feel very little qualms about settling down there for 6 hours over a single cup of tea, but it seems to be an interesting and useful topic, so keep the suggestions coming for the good of late night London humanity.

krakow, Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:45 (sixteen years ago)

i recently discovered this cheap 24hr turkish restaurant in dalston - http://www.timeout.com/london/restaurants/reviews/6612.html - terrific for whiling away some of the early hours. i think my favourite memory of it is when some friends decided they needed to shut down their house party at like 4.30am, but weren't ready to actually stop partying, so they kicked all the randoms out on the basis that everyone was leaving, and a bunch of us went here for a bit, then we went back and continued the party. a friend of mine swears by the lentil soup as a pre-emptive hangover cure.

lex pretend, Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:46 (sixteen years ago)

lol tinseltown. when keri hilson was in london she tweeted asking for 24hr establishments after her show, and ended up there.

lex pretend, Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:48 (sixteen years ago)

twenty four hour turkish food... om nom nom this is starting to sound like the beginning of some strange fantasy of mine.

For those horrible late nights after parties when you fear you're stranded because you haven't seen sight nor sound of a 149 in hours and strong turkish coffee and pretty turkish waiters would make your life so much more comfortabole...

Evren Kader (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:50 (sixteen years ago)

I think there's ice cream place in Soho that's open til way late.

Here's a recent feature from Time Out about all-night London:
http://www.timeout.com/london/aroundtown/features/1682/Summer_nights_in_London_2009.html

show us yer slime (gnarly sceptre), Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:52 (sixteen years ago)

oh shit, if only fulham was anywhere i'd want to be in the small hours, i'd be such a regular at this place in the time out guide - http://www.vingtquatre.co.uk/

24 HOUR CHAMPAGNE BREAKFASTS OMGGGGG

lex pretend, Thursday, 10 September 2009 14:58 (sixteen years ago)

i recently discovered this cheap 24hr turkish restaurant in dalston - http://www.timeout.com/london/restaurants/reviews/6612.html - terrific for whiling away some of the early hours. i think my favourite memory of it is when some friends decided they needed to shut down their house party at like 4.30am, but weren't ready to actually stop partying, so they kicked all the randoms out on the basis that everyone was leaving, and a bunch of us went here for a bit, then we went back and continued the party. a friend of mine swears by the lentil soup as a pre-emptive hangover cure.

― lex pretend, Thursday, 10 September 2009

oh...so thats what happened is it?

cherry blossom, Thursday, 10 September 2009 15:14 (sixteen years ago)

i know the place lex means and the lentil soup is AMAZING

braveclub, Thursday, 10 September 2009 15:23 (sixteen years ago)

You could catch a series of nightbuses and kill time by striking up conversations with strangers. People on night buses appreciate this gesture.

Teh Movable Object (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 10 September 2009 15:34 (sixteen years ago)

yeah for the record don't do this. just in case.

lex pretend, Thursday, 10 September 2009 15:42 (sixteen years ago)

Polite hijack: if you lived near New Barnet train station, you wouldn't say you lived in 'New Barnet' would you? Where would you say you were from? I'm writing a story just now and want my guy to come from an unfashionable but reasonable part of outer North London but can't think of any right now, other than tube stations.

Ismael Klata, Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:14 (sixteen years ago)

You'd just say you lived in Barnet, probably.

chap, Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:16 (sixteen years ago)

Cockfosters might be a good alternative - it's a funnier name.

chap, Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:18 (sixteen years ago)

Plausible and logical answer that I ought to have predicted, thank you.

Ismael Klata, Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:19 (sixteen years ago)

totteridge is nearby and has a catchy name

braveclub, Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)

Finchley or Harrow maybe?

Tuncay Stryder (Matt DC), Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)

Finchley just *sounds* like an utterly boring North London suburb.

Tuncay Stryder (Matt DC), Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:23 (sixteen years ago)

yeah Finchley has good cadence for that sort of thing.

unban dictionary (blueski), Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:34 (sixteen years ago)

It's a bit too posh I think. Plus weren't Wham! from there? Totteridge sounds like an old folks' home. Barnet seems nice and drab.

Ismael Klata, Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:37 (sixteen years ago)

Is Frognal actually real?

this must be what FAIL is really like (ledge), Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:37 (sixteen years ago)

Finchley and Frognal is an overground station. But it's nowhere near Finchley, it's on the Finchley Road in Swiss Cottage.

Evren Kader (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:41 (sixteen years ago)

Plus weren't Wham! from there?

no, Bushey

unban dictionary (blueski), Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:45 (sixteen years ago)

totteridge is nearby and has a catchy name

And is namechecked by John Lydon in a PiL song to boot

Aw naw, no' Annoni oan an' aw noo (Tom D.), Thursday, 10 September 2009 16:56 (sixteen years ago)

Are there any late night cinemas that aren't porn? Maybe even a midnight showing would waste a few hours that would otherwise be spent getting very bored over a cup of tea...

krakow, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 11:45 (sixteen years ago)

I should buy a laptop before I go, then I could chronicle my 6 hour wait here on ILX and twitter and facebook posts. You guys would get me through the night, right?

krakow, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 11:46 (sixteen years ago)

Cup of tea would be cheaper than a laptop, even at London prices

Aw naw, no' Annoni oan an' aw noo (Tom D.), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 11:48 (sixteen years ago)

Probably. I need a laptop eventually though, so we shall see.

krakow, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 11:54 (sixteen years ago)

iPhone's good enough for me, though immeasurably improved by finding wireless. The Leicester Sq cinemas must run late-night showings. Don't stay for the whole Lord of the Rings trilogy though, you'll miss your train

Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 12:37 (sixteen years ago)

krakow - what are you going to see, btw?

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:27 (sixteen years ago)

You're going to love it - Magma!

krakow, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:29 (sixteen years ago)

A good time is the only possible result! :-)

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 20:38 (sixteen years ago)

one year passes...

dud today: http://content.met.police.uk/News/Central-London-Bomb-Threat/1260268942048/1257246745756

A bomb threat warning has been received relating to central London today. The threat is not specific in relation to location or time.

DISPLAY NAMING RIGHTS (Upt0eleven), Monday, 16 May 2011 12:55 (fifteen years ago)

The threat level from Irish-related terrorism has not increased and remains at substantial meaning that an attack is a strong possibility. The threat level was raised in September 2010 from moderate to substantial.

This is lower than the overall threat to the UK from international terrorism which remains at severe.

what do they think this rubbish means to the public?

meanwhile the threat of being killed by your next door neighbour remains at "ah you know yourself" while the public are warned the chances of a nigerian man running you down in a bus have been increased to "probably could fucking happen all the same..."

Phelan Nulty (Local Garda), Monday, 16 May 2011 12:58 (fifteen years ago)

So, football tonight then?

Upt0eleven, Monday, 16 May 2011 13:02 (fifteen years ago)

i can't tonight actually as i have an audition...last week i was away. next week maybe?

Phelan Nulty (Local Garda), Monday, 16 May 2011 13:17 (fifteen years ago)

Yup, same time every week. Good luck with your audition.

I think this is just Jedward being sore losers tbh.

Upt0eleven, Monday, 16 May 2011 13:27 (fifteen years ago)

i also resent having to pay £3 for a beer

― stevem (blueski), Friday, 18 April 2003 10:32 (8 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

;_;

school of seven bellhops (blueski), Monday, 16 May 2011 14:02 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.