Have you ever used anyone?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
In a relationship, sexual or otherwise?

People are often accusing others of using, but are people aware of it when they do it themselves? If no, is that really using people? If yes, what were you *thinking*?

(I am interested in the process of evil)

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 March 2003 02:32 (twenty-three years ago)

I was thinking 'this is really nice, I hope nobody asks me any difficult questions' - and when I've felt used, when reflecting on the situation later, I've come to the conclusion that the individual in question probably felt the same way.

Using people in my experience is mostly because the 'victim' gives somebody the opportunity, either through unquestioning devotion or a strong crush or some vague hope of professional advancement, to take advantage of their offer without any commitment on their part. It's never particularly ill-meaning on the part of the 'user' and part of the blame in my mind will always fall on the 'usee' for not having the guts to demand a straight answer.

Anyway.

Millar (Millar), Monday, 10 March 2003 02:46 (twenty-three years ago)

I take the cynical view of human nature where every relationship is based on "using someone."

Maria (Maria), Monday, 10 March 2003 02:51 (twenty-three years ago)

it sounds shit, all of it, esp. the fact he slept with you knowing the strength of your attraction and knowing he wasn't goingto do anything about it later. That makes him a bastard in the general run of the mill sense and has nothing to do with his band.

-- Anna

It doesn't make him a bastard, if anything it makes me a bastard for pushing the issue long after he'd made it plain it wasn't going anywhere

--Kate

Kate is being hard on herself here, perhaps, but that's the way I'd see it too. She knew it wasn't going anywhere but let herself get hurt anyway. I'm sure a lot of us have done that. I think maybe Millar is mainly right.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 March 2003 14:09 (twenty-three years ago)

while that may well be true, a lot of the time people can be used without really realising it until it is too late. in many situations the complicity of the used is necessary yes, but in other cases perhaps it is the innocence or unawareness that is necessary. not everything is overt and transparent

gareth (gareth), Monday, 10 March 2003 14:24 (twenty-three years ago)

Never as a bong.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 10 March 2003 14:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Sometimes people let themselves get used in return for being needed, albeit temporarily? This may sound pathetic, but i think it's more prevalent than we think

Vic (Vic), Monday, 10 March 2003 14:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, to my shame. It started as a mutual usage thing, but didn't stay that way. I nipped it in the bud before I was too much of a bastard.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 March 2003 14:33 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, let's blame all victims because they're weak enough to "let themselves" get hurt by someone willing to exploit their flaws. Sorry, but I don't buy that for one fucking second.

Kim (Kim), Monday, 10 March 2003 14:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Hey, hang on a second. I think it's maybe useful to indicate what kind of circumstances we're talking about. I was referring to ones like Kate's. Perhaps 'mainly' was a bad word to use.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 March 2003 14:51 (twenty-three years ago)

only as a bong.

g-kit (g-kit), Monday, 10 March 2003 15:06 (twenty-three years ago)

Even so N., in that case you can perhaps say Kate's behaviour is self-destructive, but in what way could that ever possibly justify or excuse someone who would knowingly take advantage of that? People can contribute to their own pain - of course, but that's hardly the same thing as being "used" is it?

Kim (Kim), Monday, 10 March 2003 15:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Well what if A and B fancy one another but A has an idea that B is really keen? A is right: B is indeed desperate to sleep with A anyway, even if A doesn't want a relationship. B will take what B can get. Is A using B by allowing sex to happen?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:30 (twenty-three years ago)

Hmmm. What's A got that B is so desperate for? I don't get it. I don't understand what B's motivation is to be honest but I think that might be down to the wording.

They should sleep together if they both want to and are both mature enough to cope with a casual relationship.

A should not sleep with B if A thinks that B will get clingy. B will get upset. A will be hassled. I wouldn't necessarily say that A is using B(if they were to have sex) but I would say that A is a fool if A sleeps with B knowing that B will want more than sex.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:37 (twenty-three years ago)

Given how difficult it was to write that, I would advise A and B to steer well clear of each other!

Lara (Lara), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Jeez - if B is up for all that B can get no one is being *used*.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:39 (twenty-three years ago)

'allowing sex to happen'???

Emma, Monday, 10 March 2003 16:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Now I can't stop thinking of Ant & Bee and the ABC.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Hello! I seriously object to being used as an "Example" here. If Nick has situations in his OWN life that he wishes to moot for discussion, or wishes to open up his own behaviour for evaluation, then he is welcome to post them.

But in the course of this thread - which I did not start, and which has happened while I have been offline - *I* feel incredibly used.

It's one thing to post an example of your own life which you wish discuss. It is quite another to start picking apart another person's life without their knowledge or consent.

kate, Monday, 10 March 2003 16:43 (twenty-three years ago)

If A exerts a force on B and B exerts an equal but opposite force on A sex will happen!

Lara (Lara), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Threads like this are only ever veils for what is going on in someone's own life anyway, aren't they? This thread is actually about Nick's friends A and B who are in a bit of a muddle.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:47 (twenty-three years ago)

kate, isn't that the risk you run when discussing personal matters on the internet?

oops (Oops), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:48 (twenty-three years ago)

I take the cynical view of human nature where every relationship is based on "using someone."

maria speaks the truth. is a casual relationship just 2 pople using one another? are 2 poeple who are using one another for something other than sex in a relationship?

if it makes kate happy we can use an example from my life.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Ach. I'd be pissed off if people were talking about me regardless of what I'd posted.

Lara (Lara), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Do you C?

alix (alix), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I get pissed off when people aren't talking about me. There are betetr subjects? Pah!

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 March 2003 16:53 (twenty-three years ago)

is a casual relationship just 2 pople using one another? are 2 poeple who are using one another for something other than sex in a relationship?

That *is* cynical. Is it not possible that both people can exchange things freely, and then accept only what is given rather than just trying to take whatever it is that they need?

I do apologise for making any judgements about your actions Kate - it's not my business. It'd have been a lot easier if I hadn't heard the story at all.

Kim (Kim), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:11 (twenty-three years ago)

There was this guy I dated VERY briefly in high school... My most recent & melodramatic long-distance relationship had just ended. My sister asked if I wanted to go on a double date with her bf's best friend. I went out with him for a little while just for fun - to take my mind off the ex. So I felt like I was using him. But then, it turned out he cheated on me and then dumped me for not putting out. So I guess we used each other. But, like I said, it was very BRIEF and in high school, so whatever. Other than that, I don't think I've ever used any guys.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Actually, I've never really felt used by anyone.

Sarah McLUsky (coco), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry Kate. But really, it's nothing to do with your specific case. Or mine. I just used that exchange to start off a discussion. Please don't think this thread is about you.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:27 (twenty-three years ago)

used in general? No, don't think I've ever done that. Used in a specific situation? Yeah, prolly a lot.

hstencil, Monday, 10 March 2003 17:30 (twenty-three years ago)

kim, from what i've seen from the people i have dated - there is no such thing as "free exchange of emotion". everytime a girl has "feelings" there's a price tag attatched of one kind or another. as soon as someone has feelings they start expecting something in return. everyone has needs that have to be met in some manner.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:41 (twenty-three years ago)

I do know what you mean, and sure - call me an idealist! I just think that there's a big difference between hoping for things and expecting them, and I do think the former can happen.

Kim (Kim), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:44 (twenty-three years ago)

does it ever. there is actually a girl right now who's recently 'decided' she loves me. but that one i'm not going to talk about here, perhaps the next tiem we meetup if you really want to know.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:48 (twenty-three years ago)

"does it ever" as in the latter, not the former.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 10 March 2003 17:51 (twenty-three years ago)

I know this may seem hypocritical, but as soon as I read the thread title, I thought "Oh, how interesting, I might talk about Horton and how he and I used each other for various goals..." - yet I really felt violated when I read that someone else was bringing up *my* experiences as their example.

Like... *you* obviously have something on your mind, but you don't have the guts to open up your own life to discussion, so you exploit me. The difference may seem miniscule, and it may even seem hypocritical, but it bothers me.

Anyway, for *MY* take on it, I have to say that Horton and I both used each other. What bothered me wasn't him using me for sex when I clearly wanted more - that is just the way the battle of the sexes works and has always worked. Men portraying women as trying to entrap them into relationships with sex and all that crap. That was a very definite "you pays yer money, you takes yer chances on the ride" situation - both of us knew the score, and both of us were playing our own games.

The using that really bothered both of us was the careerist stuff. Him using me to get press for his band. *AND* me using him as emotional grist for my creative mill. I think ultimately, that's one of the things that bothered him - me writing songs about him, and the raw emotional honesty with which I portrayed him in the article were things he was not prepared for, and I think *he* felt slightly used.

I don't know. These are things I'd like to talk to him about, but it doesn't seem likely.

kate (suzy), Monday, 10 March 2003 20:32 (twenty-three years ago)

And sometimes who is using whom is not always easily apparent.

There is sometimes an emotional equivalent of "The first one's free" drug dealer scenario. Who is the victim there? The person going "Oh, go ahead, use me" or the person getting seduced into addiction by a nefarious person with an ulterior motive?

kate (suzy), Monday, 10 March 2003 20:34 (twenty-three years ago)

To be of use
To be of use

kephm, Tuesday, 11 March 2003 00:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Err.. really I just thought of this question because of the 'have you ever sued anyone?' one. In personal terms, the concept of 'using' is one that was on mind a while ago more than now. But in general terms, the reason I don't bring up such matters on the board is that there are people I know on the board and it might make both me and them uncomfortable. Again, I'm sorry if you feel used but there's nothing much more I can do except reiterate that I don't want people to talk about you.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 01:18 (twenty-three years ago)

What Mariya said.

Regarding our hypothetical friends A and B above, it should be noted that B is "using" A for companionship (or attempting to at any rate)just as much as A is "using" B for sex.

But really, what human relationship, sexual or otherwise, is entered into without one or both parties hoping to get something out of it?

-M, Tuesday, 11 March 2003 01:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I guess it really comes down to imbalance. When one knows that the other is significantly keener than the other and can act more or less however they wish, take things as far as they wish and stop whenever they wish, just cause the other is so besotted. Even if they don't abuse that power by doing anything specifically 'bad', allowing a relationship to continue in that context is perhaps intrinsically 'using', because of the imbalance.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 01:32 (twenty-three years ago)

i got a blowjob once from a strange girl i met on the internet. i didn't even know her name until afterwards. it was pretty mutual though.

john fail (cenotaph), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 03:29 (twenty-three years ago)

physically, you mean?

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 03:30 (twenty-three years ago)

a 69 would have been mutual

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 03:30 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, that's what I was wondering. (Do any women refer to cunnilingus as 'a blow job'?)

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 03:48 (twenty-three years ago)

some do, yes

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 03:48 (twenty-three years ago)

i have gotten involved with people when i wasn't really sure it was working, just to feel like somebdy cared about me, but i haven't done that since i was a teenager.

di smith (lucylurex), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 04:42 (twenty-three years ago)

I had a big argument with a girl recently because she used the term "blow job" to refer to cunnilingus and I was totally outraged. I think we settled that "head job" could be used gender neutrally as could "go down".

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 05:09 (twenty-three years ago)

he hee, i don't know about "head job". it sounds like an insult - like 'head case' or something. i honestly don't know what i'd do if someone were to offer me a 'head job'

laugh i guess

dyson (dyson), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 06:02 (twenty-three years ago)

I've used people as beer coasters before, and I'd do it again.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Tuesday, 11 March 2003 10:10 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.