Bastardising the English Language

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
My pet hate?
The Americanisation of the ENGLISH language. 'Lazy' English as we know it. Ugh!

There is only one way to use the English language - and that's the correct way. Realise will ALWAYS have an 's' in it.......

Also, this vile trend of 'text' spelling (b4, u etc)... it just gives us a generation of people who simply cannot spell correctly.

russ t, Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:45 (twenty-three years ago)

but there's no real logic to silent letters or spelling words not how they sound, so although I consider myself excellent at 'correct' English spelling I actually think the American way is more sensible - even though it still irritates me when i see it in print.

txt spelling is fine - its all Primal Scream's fault I think. I suggest giving every child a Speak & Spell though, if anything just because the little computer voice is so cool.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:51 (twenty-three years ago)

A thread about "Bastardising the English Language" on ILE...oh, the irony.

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:54 (twenty-three years ago)

They're over their pet hates over there.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Apart from the one against which they're about to start a war.

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:59 (twenty-three years ago)

too many flavorings and colorings, that is the problem

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 13 March 2003 14:01 (twenty-three years ago)

I remember being scandalised, aged 12 in my first German lesson, when Mr Hogg's first words were "English is a bastard language..."

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 13 March 2003 14:03 (twenty-three years ago)

my job = correcting the grammar and spelling of the highly educated
hence my escape = bastardising the english language

(since the 'z' is there in the original greek it actually scores higher on the pedant-meter: noah webster's rewiring of english was very extremely painstaking, the opposite of lazy)

txtng RDBLY rqrs mor tht thn wrtng in fll obv

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 13 March 2003 14:04 (twenty-three years ago)

trolling hits a linguistic turn

Alan (Alan), Thursday, 13 March 2003 14:06 (twenty-three years ago)

russ is not a troll; he has been posting for some time.

as regards bastardisation of the english language, can we stop equating "troll" with "poster who doesn't agree with me"?

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 13 March 2003 14:14 (twenty-three years ago)

blimey! that's the first time i called anyone a troll, and i knew he wasn't really (as you say, he's been around for ages), but i assumed he was being facetious. but "There is only one way to use the English language - and that's the correct way" is boringly wrong, and i'm not interested in explaining why.

Alan (Alan), Thursday, 13 March 2003 14:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Alan..

err...right.

"There is only one way to use the English language - and that's the correct way" is boringly wrong, and i'm not interested in explaining why. .... but interested enough to leave a message here that made little sense to anyone bar yourself?

Weird.

russ t, Thursday, 13 March 2003 14:22 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, sorry. won't do it again.

Alan (Alan), Thursday, 13 March 2003 14:25 (twenty-three years ago)

alan's post makes sense, russ t: even if it wrongly/jokingly describes you as a troll it's perfectly semantically clear

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 13 March 2003 14:31 (twenty-three years ago)

and that's the trouble with it.

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 13 March 2003 14:36 (twenty-three years ago)

The one that confuses me is when people say, "X is more [y] than any {category of which X is a member}." I don't mind it, but because of my overliteralism the absence of the word "other" gives my head a little logic glitch-beat, like in the Madonna James Bond song.

felicity (felicity), Thursday, 13 March 2003 16:55 (twenty-three years ago)

I caught this morning morning's minion, king-
dom of daylight's dauphin, dapple-dawn-drawn Falcon, in his riding
Of the rolling level underneath him steady air, and striding
High there, how he rung upon the rein of a wimpling wing
In his ecstasy! then off, off forth on swing,
As a skate's heel sweeps smooth on a bow-bend: the hurl and gliding
Rebuffed the big wind. My heart in hiding
Stirred for a bird, - the achieve of, the mastery of the thing!

Brute beauty and valour and act, oh, air, pride, plume, here
Buckle! AND the fire that breaks from thee then, a billion
Times told lovelier, more dangerous, O my chevalier!

No wonder of it: sheer plod makes plough down sillion
Shine, and blue-bleak embers, ah my dear,
Fall, gall themselves, and gash gold-vermilion.

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 13 March 2003 16:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Russ, you must REALLY hate Jamaicans

oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Mark, is that Hopkins?

Chris P (Chris P), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:03 (twenty-three years ago)

are you jamaican, cos jamaican me crazy

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Yup.

(Just giving Russ what he wants.)

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:04 (twenty-three years ago)

I thought Russ wanted English publications to stick with English spellings. If I knew he wanted Hopkins sonnets I would have been much more excited to read this thread.

Chris P (Chris P), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:08 (twenty-three years ago)

haha chris i tht by mark you meant me

"txtng RDBLY rqrs mor tht thn wrtng in fll obv" = not hopkins

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:08 (twenty-three years ago)

in case you were in doubt

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes but wow, Hopkins was so fetishistic about getting so much information (& so many consonants) into his tightly packt sonnets that really maybe he would have loved txtspk.

Chris P (Chris P), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:14 (twenty-three years ago)

my wife's just gone to the Caribbean...no she didnt travel of her own accord, i ordered her to go

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:18 (twenty-three years ago)

i entirely agree that text-speak is intrinsically poetically richer than gravity-bound print-prose

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:19 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.