THIS IS THE THREAD WHERE YOU TAL TO YOURSELF, REVEAL YOUR TRUE FEELINGS AND GET KICKED OFF THE BOARD THREAD

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Me: Geeze, these guys got thin skin.

Me: (scratching head): You think?

Me: (scratching nuts): Yeah, you need to agree with some people and disagree with others.

Me: (scratching ass): Hmmm.. How do I know which group I need to agree with and which group to disagree with?

Me: (scratching head again)... did you say something?

― I AM NOT HERE TO START A RIOT, Monday, 17 March 2003 17:51 (twenty-three years ago)

I AM ALL BURNED OUT AND TOO MESSED UP TO PLAY GAMES AT WORK

― Jon Williams (ex machina), Monday, 17 March 2003 17:55 (twenty-three years ago)

I've got the complete list.

― Blood and Rockets, Monday, 17 March 2003 17:57 (twenty-three years ago)

"Yeah, you need to agree with some people and disagree with others"

very true and very sad.

― Marika (marika), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:03 (twenty-three years ago)

why the hell do you 'need' to agree with one group.

DNFTT

― Ed (dali), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:06 (twenty-three years ago)

I still want to know how one "tal to"'s oneself.

― Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Everyone needs to agree with ME!!!!

What is this thread about exactly? Revealing truths?
My office had a St. Patty's day lunch and I got a plastic clover ring. JEALOUS???? Am I gonna get kicked off now?

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:08 (twenty-three years ago)

[block of japanese characters removed - mark p]
sigh

― Jon Williams (ex machina), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:16 (twenty-three years ago)

HA!!!! I like your sense of humor, Jon.

― Sarah MCLusky (coco), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:24 (twenty-three years ago)

"sense of humor"

― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:25 (twenty-three years ago)

"like"

― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:25 (twenty-three years ago)

nicole,

let's see... if I was in group a and called you an idiot it probably wouldn't mean much. however, if you were in group a and i was not there would be an army of "informers" posting on the THIS IS WHERE YOU SHOUT FOR A MODERATOR THREAD calling you a troll or something ridiculous like that. Are you important enough for me to call you an idiot and have the troll busters come out and get their kicks "narcking" on me?

Ed, you related to chaki or something? You really don't "need" to be in any group. It's just that the "in-group" of ilXor wanks want to be cheeky but can't stand it when anyone disagrees with them or out wits them (which, to tell you the truth, ain't very fucking hard!)

If something's a little saucy and one of the group isn't responsible you can bet a wadhunter like Jody Beth Rosen is going to link your message with one of her troll alert underscores. What a mantra to possess! HMMMM TROLL. BAD. DESTROY. And, at least half the time there ain't nobody trolling. It only seems like trolling to them because they seem to have such a large opinion of themselves that a difference of opinion has to be baiting, right? What a fucking goddam load of cheeseball shite that is!

― I AM NOT HERE TO START A RIOT, Monday, 17 March 2003 19:28 (twenty-three years ago)

spelling "outwit" properly would be a good start.

― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:34 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.staticfiends.com/galleries/government_galleries/riot%20police3.jpg

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:35 (twenty-three years ago)

-out +nit

― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Fascist ILX's incredible success at chasing dickheads off the boards can be plainly seen from the last few days' new threads.

Why do people seem to assume they have the right to be liked whenever they find a new bulletin board?

― Tom (Groke), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Out Hud?

― Jon Williams (ex machina), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:47 (twenty-three years ago)

NB start a riot person if you're the guy who's been posting the random porno pics and getting them deleted by Ned, well, sorry for stopping you sharing your porn and all that but it is in the FAQ ("Can I Post Pictures?").

― Tom (Groke), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:48 (twenty-three years ago)

!!!

― gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:50 (twenty-three years ago)

ummm

― Jon Williams (ex machina), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Out Hud?

No thanks.

― hstencil, Monday, 17 March 2003 19:51 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll never forget the day (though I have forgotten the date... hmmm) when I was reading a thread on ILX and this freakin' huge penis came up (literally) on my screen at work. I was so scared someone might see it that I just turned off my computer instead of grabbing for the mouse.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 17 March 2003 19:55 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah... I got surprised in a similar way. I thought I was going to get fired because I work for a government agency and they've got these FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY warnings on all terminals. They usually permit some surfing but porno/rascist/hate sites are strictly forbidden.

― b s d, Monday, 17 March 2003 20:02 (twenty-three years ago)

J-Dub: I don't think people dislike you (I'm assuming it was you who started this thread), but you're insistance to continue a few obnoxious habits (the troll responses to everything and imbedding bandwith-sucking files (huge pics, music files) in threads without warning, mainly) despite others' complaints is something to dislike. You seem to be bitching that no one respects you, but you haven't been respecting everyone else!

― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Monday, 17 March 2003 20:03 (twenty-three years ago)

There was random p0rn on ILE? I missed it?

(frowny face)

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 17 March 2003 20:03 (twenty-three years ago)

I have been happily visiting Europorn sites all afternoon as part of my job! But it's still bad to post them.

― Tom (Groke), Monday, 17 March 2003 20:04 (twenty-three years ago)

There was one time when Chris C linked a picture on (I think) smellsawful.com, which redirects picture links to closeups of spermy cocks. The best part was the tag line, which was "I just had to link this."

I remember initially looking at it and thinking, "Is that a peach with frosting on it? OH GOD NO IT ISN'T!!!!!!!!!!!" and frantically hitting the "Back" button.

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 17 March 2003 20:10 (twenty-three years ago)

I have been happily visiting Europorn sites all afternoon as part of my job! But it's still bad to post them.

There is no such job! I don't believe it!

― Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Monday, 17 March 2003 20:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Jon Williams has of course never bothered explaining why he thinks it's OK for HIM to ban people from the board, by posting stuff which causes their computers to crash

― mark s (mark s), Monday, 17 March 2003 20:14 (twenty-three years ago)

The European fish gutting association?

― Ed (dali), Monday, 17 March 2003 20:14 (twenty-three years ago)

as i remember some of tom's previous "jobs" have involved buying cell phones and "writing about the internet", so obviously he's a liar.

― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 17 March 2003 20:14 (twenty-three years ago)

My job today is to find out which sites high-earning households in EU countries visit most. Where I don't recognise a site's name I have to hem hem check it out.

Biggest disappointment - 'Privata Affarers' which turns out not to be a steamy bits-on-sides lovefest but a Swedish financial newspaper. :(

― Tom (Groke), Monday, 17 March 2003 20:17 (twenty-three years ago)

My job today is to find out which sites high-earning households in EU countries visit most. Where I don't recognise a site's name I have to hem hem check it out.

So you're spying on porn users? That's serious voyeurism.

― Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Monday, 17 March 2003 20:22 (twenty-three years ago)

They know we're spying, so it's exhibitionism.

(Is it voyeurism if you're spying on an exhibitionist?)

― Tom (Groke), Monday, 17 March 2003 20:30 (twenty-three years ago)

They know you're spying on you, and they go to porn sites? I don't get life.

― Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Monday, 17 March 2003 20:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Those Europeans have a very 'mature' attitude to porn.

― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 17 March 2003 20:42 (twenty-three years ago)

They know you're spying on you

I like how the complex logic of the situation gets me syntactically confused.

― Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Monday, 17 March 2003 20:47 (twenty-three years ago)

random porn that was deleted? why isn't there are hall of shame bin they have been stored in so we can look at 'em?

― order some disorder, Monday, 17 March 2003 22:25 (twenty-three years ago)

for random porn, see: the rest of the internet

― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 17 March 2003 22:27 (twenty-three years ago)

That random porn on the net sucks. I want to see something that gets a whole board to drop a load simultaneously.

― order some disorder, Monday, 17 March 2003 22:52 (twenty-three years ago)

for random idiots see: the rest of the internet

― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 17 March 2003 23:25 (twenty-three years ago)

europorn = mustachioed frenchmen wearing berets and those white and red striped shirts with cigarettes and american flags strategically placed on their bodies, surely?

― Dave M. (rotten03), Monday, 17 March 2003 23:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Why search the net for random idiots when there are some many here? My lord, jess, the dixie chicks got you that riled up already?

― order some disorder, Monday, 17 March 2003 23:48 (twenty-three years ago)

ah it's nice to see you being specific about who the random idiots here are

― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 17 March 2003 23:50 (twenty-three years ago)

"specific random idiots"?

― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 17 March 2003 23:51 (twenty-three years ago)

what kind of unit of measure is "some many" anyway?

― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 17 March 2003 23:54 (twenty-three years ago)

One Kilo?

― S Samson, Monday, 17 March 2003 23:55 (twenty-three years ago)

it's the average of "none some many all"

― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 00:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Which would be?

― S Samson, Tuesday, 18 March 2003 00:08 (twenty-three years ago)

i think you mean Median

― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 00:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Skipping 12 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

I just realised this was a cunning play where I had revealed myself as a Nixon semi-supporter and now I am going to be banned! : - o

There is one photo of Nixon meeting up with Eisenhower at the President's country retreat. Nixon in a black suit and tie and Eisenhower looking like a man's man. By consequence Nixon looked stuffy and boring. And there is the infamous Kennedy/Nixon make up debacle during the debate. By all accounts he could be described as a man who looked too uncomfortable for his own good!

― S Samson, Tuesday, 18 March 2003 00:53 (twenty-three years ago)

paranoia:
i. ike despised him and didn't want him on the ticket, and undermined nixon publicly and privately
ii. nixon knew the kinds of dodgy games he was playing with e.g. the alger hiss thing, and assumed (correctly) that ppl acting very high and mighty towards him would have (did) play similar dodgy games
iii. nixon knew that joseph kennedy helped steal the election from jfk
iv. nixon knew that lyndon johnson was by far the most (brilliantly) corrupt politician of his day (in good causes and bad)
v. nixon knew when he and kissinger opened secret channels to hanoi, which undermined the democrat administration's peace talks at a crucial moment just b4 the 1968 elections, helping him win, that lbj was perfectly well aware of this (bcz hoover had nixon bugged), but couldn't openly (at that time) use this knowledge bcz bugging yr political oppnents wz verboten
vi. he wz always furiously angry that almost everything he was pilloried for had been done just as much by the glamorous kennedies (and lbj), yet they seemd to get away with it when he always got called on it

― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 00:56 (twenty-three years ago)

haha iii. nixon knew that joseph kennedy helped steal the election FOR jfk, i mean

(richard condon invaded my subconscious briefly)

― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 00:58 (twenty-three years ago)

I loved Nixon's kitchen debate.

― S Samson, Tuesday, 18 March 2003 01:02 (twenty-three years ago)

i like how in haldeman's CD-Rom diaries nixon is always referred to as "the P"

― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 01:04 (twenty-three years ago)

In that one debate against Khrushchev he became the iconic Americana idolising all that America was striving for. The perfect televised middle-class life. That was a brilliant stroke and coup for Nixon.

― S Samson, Tuesday, 18 March 2003 01:05 (twenty-three years ago)

let's see... I figure it would have to be a little more than many and a hell of a lot more than a few.

BTW,

are you listening to Mr. Bush right now?

― order some disorder, Tuesday, 18 March 2003 01:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Mark S, a secret hobby of mine is American Politics from the 1950s. We should converse another day about this!

― S Samson, Tuesday, 18 March 2003 01:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Ha! What do you make of the ramifications of Peyton Place in female liberation and general sexuality when it was first published? Does it deserve it's place in the feminist literary canon? I would be interested to know what you think.

― S Samson, Tuesday, 18 March 2003 01:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Would you agree that Nixon misunderstood the theatrics of politics as they played forth in the arena?

― S Samson, Tuesday, 18 March 2003 01:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Get out of OC while you still can, Ned!

I knew about most of that going in, trust me.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 01:17 (twenty-three years ago)

he got to be a two-term president of the US, so not entirely!!

anyway bedtime for bonzo s

― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 01:18 (twenty-three years ago)

He knew the game, admittedly, a fool could see that but the question would be: What was Nixon's fatal flaw???

― S Samson, Tuesday, 18 March 2003 01:20 (twenty-three years ago)

can someone please explain how this relates to me? i dont understand for reals (im slow).

― chaki (chaki), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 01:39 (twenty-three years ago)

you are PUNK AS FUCK!!! ;-)

― ron (ron), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 01:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Has anyone been kicked off the board as a result of this thread yet (apart from Richard Nixon, and Tom, who kicked himself off so he could do more monitoring of high class Euro porn sites)?

― Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 01:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Dick Nixon's influence on punk rock has touched all of OC, spread to the Bay Area and spanned the globe! If it weren't for his ilk, would there be Dead Kennedys? I think not!

― sheikh mohamed, Tuesday, 18 March 2003 02:13 (twenty-three years ago)

http://missionofburma.com/bgu/original/horriblekitty.gif

THIS IS THE THREAD WHERE YOU TAL TO YOURSELF, REVEAL YOUR TRUE FEELINGS AND GET KICKED OFF THE BOARD THREAD

"Hey, BurmaKitty!"

"What the hell do you want, BurmaKitty? I'm busy emailing Clint Conley right now. This had BETTER BE GOOD or I'll kick yer ARSE!"

"Stop your bitchy act. Aren't YOU THE ONE RESPONSIBLE for already GETTING ONE MESSAGE BOARD SHUT DOWN?"

"Yes and no...well, maybe....yeah, sure I am... what of it?
WHAT'S IT TO YOU?"

"Is your husband jealous? It looks like he's trying to shut this BOARD DOWN TOO? How's that for your QUID PRO QUO game? One board for you. One board for him. Will you call it EVEN then?"

"Oh, you are sadly mistaken, BurmaKitty. That must be YOUR HUSBAND!
And besides, BurmaKitty is never EVEN.
She always comes out ON TOP!

Sorry, no photos for you on that one though."

― BurmaKitty (BurmaKitty), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 04:09 (twenty-three years ago)

you're really scary

― jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 04:13 (twenty-three years ago)

THE BURMA KITTY: "I've been called many things before, but never scary!"

THE INNER BURMA KITTY:"Me neither. I have been very careful to make sure that all my cuts and scrapes are treated with some sort of salve to make sure they do not leave any permanent marks."

― BurmaKitty (BurmaKitty), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 04:16 (twenty-three years ago)

This thread clearly shows that no matter what kind of weirdo you are there's always room on ILX.

― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 11:52 (twenty-three years ago)

I fuck slugs.

― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 12:30 (twenty-three years ago)

To help cure the warts?

― Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 12:32 (twenty-three years ago)

No, I was just sick of all that shell shit that you get with snails.

― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 12:35 (twenty-three years ago)

But you need a bit of friction, surely?

― James Ball (James Ball), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 12:47 (twenty-three years ago)

They make their own lubrication.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 14:05 (twenty-three years ago)

ABANDON ALL HOPE

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 14:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Nothing says "The 21st Century" quite like slugfucking.

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 14:59 (twenty-three years ago)

How so?

― Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 15:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Because before then the plastic surgery wasn't available to make things happen.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 15:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Are we augmenting the penis or the slug?

*Mummy, I'm scared*

― Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 16:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Depends on your kink.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 16:17 (twenty-three years ago)

The only kinky thing about me is my hair, mister.

― Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 16:18 (twenty-three years ago)

*bows*

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 16:23 (twenty-three years ago)

BurmaKitty,

This is you know who and i am not responsible for you know what. I've got another Southwest flight coupon if you want it.

Your husband.

― Lithium Lunchbox (Lithium Lunchbox), Tuesday, 18 March 2003 22:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Talking to oneself -> europorn -> Richard Nixon -> talking to oneself -> slugfucking

LEAST MEDIAN ILE THREAD EVAH?

― OleM (OleM), Wednesday, 19 March 2003 00:30 (twenty-three years ago)

it is the prototype for a new global community

― Maria (Maria), Wednesday, 19 March 2003 00:33 (twenty-three years ago)

richard nixon v. lbj: FITE!

(seriously: for the past year, i've been slogging through the 3-volume caro bio of LBJ, and an awful lot of the things that people have said about Nixon upthread could apply as well [if not more so] to LBJ. an LBJ v. RMN presidential race in '68 would have been interesting, to say the least.)

― Tad (llamasfur), Wednesday, 19 March 2003 00:44 (twenty-three years ago)

re:

I fuck slugs.
-- N.

Nick, I love you.

They make their own lubrication.
-- Ned Raggett

Ned, I think I love you more.

This is you know who and i am not responsible for you know what. I've got another Southwest flight coupon if you want it.
Your husband.

Sure, Honey!

Thank God for ILX or Mr and Mrs BurmaKitty may never communicate!

― BurmaKitty (BurmaKitty), Wednesday, 19 March 2003 02:37 (twenty-three years ago)

[post deleted]

― spiced garlic shrimp, Wednesday, 19 March 2003 03:11 (twenty-three years ago)

the revelations we've seen since dickie nix died blow me away

eg: about his dirty tricks circa '68 (mark s refers to) are staggering (sabotage the peace talks so americans vote against lbj; the theory about this is thought to be if '68 talks had worked 100,000 mostly black americans wouldn't have died (uh plus millions of vietnamese) ie maybe not continued the war even -- is this crime against humanity ? or just the most cynical political move post stalin-hitler pact ?)

do americans know about the new wave of pre-w.gate

or that young nixon in '56-'58 out of law school was attache/ travelling salesman for pepsi sales campaign in vietnam with use of helicopter to sell coke to vietnam (a campaign he knew pepsi was losing as was co.co., therefore failure to sales push coke into vietnam defined the line of commie resistance) -- nixon as prototype "yank freedom fighter" with helicopter & chemicals

if they aren't buying american coke they must be commie, and he knew he couldn't fly helicopters further into asia, hence early version of "domino"/ "resistance to american imperialism" theories

― george gosset (gegoss), Wednesday, 19 March 2003 04:00 (twenty-three years ago)

george - lbj didn't run in 68, and nixon wasn't a young man out of law school in 56-58, he was vice president of the usa. if the democrats had nominated a candidate who had won at least one primary in 68 they might not have lost, of course having the left self-destruct and hand the electorate to their supposed enemy (shades of 2004) didn't help either.

― P, Friday, 28 March 2003 04:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Also, Pepsi and Coke are different companies.

― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 28 March 2003 06:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Noam Chomsky sez Nixon was "the last liberal president we had": what do you think of THAT?

― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 28 March 2003 07:01 (twenty-three years ago)

God love Chomsky, but he needs to rethink his position. Realpolitik and shit like that.

― Mr. Diamond (diamond), Friday, 28 March 2003 07:03 (twenty-three years ago)

he did increase gov't spending more than any president since FDR, etc. etc., and Chomsky's cynicism is consuming enough that he doesn't see any big difference in FDR's foreign policy and Nixon's.

― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 28 March 2003 07:46 (twenty-three years ago)

humphrey would have been a good president, nixon sucked, Nixon's defeat might have very well forestalled the rise of the new right (election '68 was where nixon and his crew test-ran the "southern strategy") and might have slowed the dissolution of the New Deal coalition. but it's hard for me to be too hard on the folks who didn't vote for humphrey that year, because it was really a matter of life and death for some folks and neither party was really distinguishable on Vietnam.

and as for "nixon being the last liberal president" -- look to the congresses he dealt with (democratic controlled) -- and compare to the congresses clinton had to deal with (newtie and the class of '94 repugnants).

― Tad (llamasfur), Friday, 28 March 2003 07:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Ted Koppel needs a new do.

Michael Moore is an ass.

The academy awards are for asses.

Hollywood is full of asses.

Cheesecake is a fiction in California.

Nothing in your CD player could possibly be better than anything in mine.

Susan Sarandon and Julianne Moore are two of the dumbest bitches I have ever heard speak.

Pink condoms are for fairies.

Nothing you could say could possibly change my opinion of you as being a superstupiddipshit so shutthefuckupandpassthebutter.

I don't live in a world where everyone loves each other so the war in Iraq must be a good thing.

The French are spiteful ingrates who smell bad and smoke inferior cigarettes. They aren't known as frogs because they are loveable folks.

Germans can kick French ass pretty fucking good but that doesn't mean they can be trusted either.

The Tigris and Euphrates are two of the most important rivers in the genesis of civilization. Now they are crossing points for the beginning of its end.

― The Big Clam, Friday, 28 March 2003 08:02 (twenty-three years ago)

and i'm by no means a kneejerk Chomsky basher. he's dead right in his analyses of the media (esp. the concentration of ownership and its effect on our political processes and discourse), he was talking about east timor long before that cause was "fashionable," and he's more often right than wrong wr2 to the middle east. but he is a bit too reductionist, too willing to gloss over real differences between the 2 parties (not a fault confined to him), and his real flaw is that he never really seems to propose any real solutions to any of the problems he (more often than not correctly) identifies.

― Tad (llamasfur), Friday, 28 March 2003 08:03 (twenty-three years ago)

as usual, much of my dislike of chomsky has more to do with his followers than the man himself, though I agree generally with your assessment of him esp. - his real flaw is that he never really seems to propose any real solutions to any of the problems he (more often than not correctly) identifies, he's much more of a (understandably) cynic than an actual political thinker, and to the extent that his methods reduce the potential of his followers to nothing grander than conspiracy theories (y'know things like winning elections, passing laws, 'change') I'd say he harms his cause almost as much as he aids it.

― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 28 March 2003 08:17 (twenty-three years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.