i read swamp thing last night

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
ie the "graphic novel" (= the k-tel compilation of comix i know) abt wood-rue taking control of the world of plants

the art is worste than anything i have ever encountered in an item actually requiring that ppl part w.money: i guess i had repressed this fact

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 19 March 2003 15:39 (twenty-three years ago)

plus some comixors i also read since my new shelves meant i cd empty some v.old boxes

watchmen = rub
dark knight returns = much better than i remember
bits of cerebus church and state = as i remember

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 19 March 2003 15:42 (twenty-three years ago)

(why is this not in new answers yet?)

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 19 March 2003 16:10 (twenty-three years ago)

the k-tel compilation of comix i know

??? X-Men Unlimited is what you're thinking of here.

comics = singles
Graphic Novels = albums
TPBs (like you were reading) = singles collections

The very best TPBs = PulpIntro, as proven by science.

FACT: Mark Millar's run on Swamp Thing gives Moore's a run for its money. (no-one else knows this fact)
FACT: Mark Millar's previous work was under the editorship of our very own M. Skidmore
FACT: Mark Millar's work has gotten worse the longer it has got from this high point. (er, this may require you having never heard of Skrull Kill Krew)
Result: Mark Millar should reunite with M. Skidmore and fucking finish Saviour!

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 19 March 2003 17:08 (twenty-three years ago)

nyeh, the Swamp Thing art Mark S is giving out about (Totleben or Veitch?) is actually v. good.

Andrew - surely the logic is that Mark Millar finishing off Saviour will just mean that it will end badly?

DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 19 March 2003 19:34 (twenty-three years ago)

pencilled bissette, inked totleben, and it's terrible

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 19 March 2003 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)

I think Mark M's writing now is much better than it was - The Ultimates is tremendous. When he started, through me, he was full of ideas and energy, but had very little skill or technique, and he's become a skilled writer without running out of ideas. All I taught him was some basic technical stuff, I think - I restructured Saviour #1, and insisted he work with an artist-writer, with the artist taking responsibility for turning his scripts into comics, which they hardly were. I was more interventionist of Mark's work than I think anyone else's. I bet he doesn't need much of that kind of help now.

Mark S is unkind to the Bissette/Totleben art. I'm not a fan, but it sets a rough and uneasy and unpleasant atmosphere, which is generally apt I think. Both could draw, and thought about their layouts (though Alan always gave exceptionally detailed instructions, sometimes including sketches.

My infinitessimal contribution to Swamp Thing: Alan and I were talking about Tom Waits one day, and we both loved his song Burma-Shave. Out of this came the end of one issue, an open nod to that song. I also suggested he feature the great old soul singer Swamp Dogg in a cameo sometime, as a kind of joke on the old comics habit of creating Superdog, Batdog and so on, but he didn't. (I was in a mailing group with Swamp Dogg for a while last year!)

I think Swamp Thing is a great example of Alan using his intelligence and thoughtfulness in a very positive way - he looked at a pretty dreary title, and reimagined it in a way that fit with its history, that was entirely fresh and new, and that opened up all sorts of possibilities which have been the foundation for this title for another twenty years. There's no sense of Alan feeling he is better than his material, or just trudging through yet another clever pastiche.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 20 March 2003 18:33 (twenty-three years ago)

I only ever read the Bernie Wrightson issues. Isn't that just typical of me? They weren't very good, either.

ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Thursday, 20 March 2003 18:38 (twenty-three years ago)

but he didn't

But Mark Millar swore to give us a Swamp Dog, and did!

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 20 March 2003 18:41 (twenty-three years ago)

swamp thing suxx.

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 20 March 2003 20:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Cerebus Church and State kix azz. Why did Dave Sim go insane?

J (Jay), Thursday, 20 March 2003 20:52 (twenty-three years ago)

i like the totleban/bissette art. at least i used to. did you always hate it mark s?

gaz (gaz), Thursday, 20 March 2003 21:30 (twenty-three years ago)

i don't remember having an opinion when i first read it, but i did not hurry out to buy more swamp things, so i guess i wasn't that impressed

to be a bit fairer than i was upthread, i think the leprous repro for the compilation book may be partly to blame

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 20 March 2003 22:05 (twenty-three years ago)

i think the first uk versions of this were in b&w!

gaz (gaz), Thursday, 20 March 2003 22:07 (twenty-three years ago)

I think black and white reproduction suits the art. Certainly I remember enjoying the issue by issue black and white reprints that Vertigo put out until they realised I was the only person buying them. I don't think I've ever read past the end of those reprints, but I enjoyed them a lot. Part of what's great about them is how issue-y they are - you know, lots of great standalone issues, to such an extent that it all seems a bit disjointed if you read it in albums.

I remember a later issue in which the swamp thing is a golem in an alternate world where the Nazis won world war II and Marilyn Monroe is Amerika's first lady... who wrote that?

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 20 March 2003 22:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Mark to the Millar.

I also love the art in the Millar stories: it was by Philip Hester and Kim DeMulder, and I don't think either of them have done better since. Though it was very suited to horror.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 20 March 2003 22:59 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm always slightly surprised by Mark's antipathy toward Alan Moore, who still strikes me as being far and away the most consistent, clever, entertaining mainstream comics writer of the last twenty plus years (maybe that isn't such an achievement, I dunno) I haven't read 'Watchmen' since it was published, but I suspect that revisiting it in one big Graph Nov lump, rather than as a monthly cliffhanging EVENT, robs it of quite a lot of its original power and fascination. There are certainly problems w/ the plot, esp. the ending: Ozymandius is too obv. the villain, and doesn't really convince as a giant mastermindful brane. But the cuteness of all the storytelling/structural devices, the depth and texture of the invented world, the human feeling, the play with genre and iconography, all of it thrilled me at the time. But then I liked the pictures, which again I recall that Mark doesn't rate - it's v. difficult to imagine another artist being so MODEST, artwise, as Dave Gibbons, so selflessly in service of the story.

I agree that Bissette's pencils can be v. rough, but in compensation they have a great deal of energy and even, at times, a v. scary 'aura'/atmos. Totleben is one of the few comics artists who seems to have been influenced by Virgil Finlay, who I adore, and I like the combination of the rough and smooth in their collaboration - Bisette is too sloppy on his own, Totleben too stiff. The issues drawn by Rick Veitch and inked by Totleben are nowhere near as gd, imho. And unlike the Vicar, I much prefer their appearance in colour in the original comic books - subsequent reproductions (esp. the Titan editions) were shot from film, not the original artwork, and often look terribly muddy.

Andrew L (Andrew L), Thursday, 20 March 2003 23:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Issue one of the recent (=probably five years ago) black and white reprints featured the worst colour to black and white transference I've ever seen, particularly on the first page. Which is a shame, as the story in question is The Anatomy Lesson.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 20 March 2003 23:09 (twenty-three years ago)

re: Watchmen - the problem is not that Oz is obv the villain but that it comes from that brief period in the early '80s when bad guys computer systems were always ridiculously easy to hack into with one simple and obvious password.

of course, maybe he KNEW that the eventually Rorshach and Nite Owl would work out what was going on, so he made his password readily guessable so they would find out he was behind IT, whatever IT was, and so be out of NY when IT happened.

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 20 March 2003 23:30 (twenty-three years ago)

mark, dark knight returns is TERRIBLE. i re-read it last year for the first time in five and i was fucking CRINGING with every page.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 March 2003 23:39 (twenty-three years ago)

I remember that scene - it's like the Eddie Izzard routine. "Let's try... 'goeff'! Ahhhh! I knew he'd have a BACKDOOR..." I'm not sure it's necessary to try and give that any extra credibility by imagining motives for it, though. Real life has enough of these kinds of quirks in it to allow for a few in fiction.

On Bissette's art - it's brilliant. It's visceral, and glutenous, and he does amazing things with eyes. They kind of stare at you.

Dark Knight Returns is a big fat Batman comic with no sense of humour whatsoever. Did the Rainbow Batman die for this?

What was the new series of ST like?

Al_Ewing, Thursday, 20 March 2003 23:47 (twenty-three years ago)

four years pass...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lU8vSa5se0

Dr. Superman, Monday, 17 December 2007 23:07 (eighteen years ago)

one year passes...

http://www.toplessrobot.com/2009/09/dick_durock_1937-2009.php

RIP: Dick Durock, Swamp Thing. Died of pancreatic cancer

kingfish, Saturday, 26 September 2009 17:25 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.