And there's an entire site for it at:
http://www.primateprison.org/
There's your details. Anyone who even drops and email to Cambridge and tells them that they're against this is doing some good. Here's the addresses (taken from the BUAV site). This needs stopped, animal experimentation, especially on our closest relative in the animal kingdom, is sick and morally wrong.
Vice ChancellorAddress: The Vice Chancellors Office, The Old Schools, Trinity Lane,Cambridge, CB2 1TN. Tel: 01223 332290 & 332291. Fax: 01223 339669Email: [email protected]
Principle Administration OfficersAddresses: The Old Schools, Trinity Lane, Cambridge, CB2 1TN.
David A Livesey - Secretary General of the FacultiesTel: 01223 332307 Fax: 01223 332332Email: [email protected] & [email protected]
Dr Timothy Mead - RegistrarTel: 01223 332200Fax: 01223 332332Email: [email protected] & [email protected]
Joanne M Womack- TreasurerTel: 01223 332227Email: [email protected] & [email protected]
Estate Management & Building ServicesAddress: 74 Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1RWTel: 01223 337700Fax: 01223 765105
David M Adamson - DirectorTel: 01223 337806Email: [email protected]Michael Bienias - Head of Major ProjectsEmail: [email protected]
The BUAV discovered during their undercover investigation at Cambridge Uni's existing animal labs that technicians were told topunish the monkeys by withholding food, banging on their cages and slamming cage shutters onto their fingers. LET THEM KNOW WHAT YOU THINK OF THEM!
― C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:49 (twenty-two years ago)
EMBRACE YOUR FATE
― ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:50 (twenty-two years ago)
Secondly, mate - "28 Days Later" was shit. Yeah, cos animal welfare/ rights types actually go into biological testing areas and release animals... YEAH. COS WE'RE ALL THICK AS SHIT. If you knew anything you'd know that there's only one UK case of a primate escaping into the wild and that was from Huntingdon Life Sciences themselves whose incompetent wankers actually let the thing out. "28 Days Later" was also factually incorrect as testing on chimps and great apes is now illegal in Europe despite the pro-vivisection mobs best attempts to say otherwise.
As for the photo - I don't find that funny and presume it comes from the mind of someone very sick or very ill-educated on this.
― C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:57 (twenty-two years ago)
Twistin my melon, man
― Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― dyson (dyson), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:58 (twenty-two years ago)
Please stop posting pics of monkeys being tested on.
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)
x-post
― ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:11 (twenty-two years ago)
*chuckle*
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:12 (twenty-two years ago)
Also, things I find hugely upsetting include assuming someone has a "clear mental imbalance" when what they have is a twisted way of dealing with your posts. If that upsets or offends you, bear that feeling in mind when you jump in with your tuppenceworth elsewhere.
― ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:12 (twenty-two years ago)
P.S. i wasn't taking the piss out of a epileptics.
― C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:14 (twenty-two years ago)
also, i am afraid that on a public forum you are going to have to deal with freedom of speech, and people posting things that you find offensive or disapprove of.
― gareth (gareth), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:16 (twenty-two years ago)
C-man
Well, as ever with animal rights types, I get a shiver from that statement -- they key word is 'even,' of course. As is well known, some 'activists' regard mere words as not enough and are quite willing to take their protest further into the realms of human-on-human violence. I'm not tarring Calum with that brush, but, why the word 'even'?
― Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:16 (twenty-two years ago)
hahaha, as if he didn't know!
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:18 (twenty-two years ago)
If someone posted an anti-Nazi thread and assholes posted pics of concentration camps i think it might upset, you know...
P.S. Human on human violence? I wouldn't have anything to with that, but from what I've seen of undercover footage in these labs I don't exactly cry when I hear Brian Cass has been given a good thump to the head.
― C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:23 (twenty-two years ago)
also, can any parellels be drawn between those who are violent to vivisectionists in the name of saving animal life, and those who are violent to abortionist in the name of saving unborn life?
― gareth (gareth), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― vive la vache, Monday, 12 January 2004 17:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:30 (twenty-two years ago)
Plus, discussion of issues like this (eg vegetarianism, smoking vs non-smoking, stuff that gets ppl riled up)rarely goes well on mail lists and bbs'. The same freedom from real-life consequence that allows you to diss ppl w/o getting smacked down on the floor, as you know would happen irl, is what allows ppl to take the piss when you try to tell people what to think. I dunno, it seems obvious to me.
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:32 (twenty-two years ago)
Calling people 'assholes' or whatever is considerably less effective. The fact that most people here ARE probably against animal testing and you have managed to turn it into a massive struggle on your part is rather amusing.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Angharienne Bradshaw (Angharienne Bradshaw), Monday, 12 January 2004 17:40 (twenty-two years ago)
erm, i didn't just mean on this thread calz. i meant that your posting history has made a serious discussion on this topic impossible - and the only way to fix that is to be nicer on ILX for a consistent period of time.
"History of my posts shows I'm DEADLY SERIOUS about this topic."
indeed. and so people are delighted to have something they can upset you with (I'm not particularly bothered).
again, i'm not having a go at you, i'm just saying.
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:07 (twenty-two years ago)
This is a topic that deserves better than C-Man's inflamed rhetoric, and for that matter, the faux nonchalance of others who are probably only reacting to C-Man anyway.
Anyone up for it?
― David A. (Davant), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:17 (twenty-two years ago)
unfortunately it makes it impossible to talk about subjects like this in public on ilx.
― Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:32 (twenty-two years ago)
But, sure, fire ahead if you want to take this one seriously, it would be welcome.
― C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 18:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 19:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 12 January 2004 19:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 January 2004 19:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― dean! (deangulberry), Monday, 12 January 2004 19:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 12 January 2004 19:54 (twenty-two years ago)
bribe the guards at Seaworld, did you?
― Kingfishee (Kingfish), Monday, 12 January 2004 19:59 (twenty-two years ago)
"£20 gets you half an hour."
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― dean! (deangulberry), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:02 (twenty-two years ago)
"It was very nice."
― dean! (deangulberry), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kingfishee (Kingfish), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:15 (twenty-two years ago)
I wasn't being facetious about the lab rats. I met that guy. his apartment was stacked with these cages, each of which contained a giant rat from hell. As the last link in an ALF chain (I'm assuming), he had no idea what to do with them. It was kind of funny and disturbing. But a genuine practical problem.
Re: bloodthirstyness. Dan, I was just contrasting that with the better parts of our nature, not actually implying that bloodlust was a part of animal experimentation. Having said that, however, in the stolen video tape from that head injury research, many of the researchers posed with brain injured monkeys, manipulating their limbs to simulate dancing. It was quite disturbing to watch their callousness (interestingly, the theft of this tape was one of the few instances in which a laboratory lost its research grant as a result of animal rights activism).
My own interest in this is that I used to know a number of activists, and it was my girlfriend at the time who received the incredibly harsh jail term. I'm not an activist myself, but it was an eye-opener to see the way the British establishment handled this issue. By nature, I'm a "shades-of-grey" type person, but I do think some pretty awful stuff goes on w/r/t our treatment of other animal species.
― David A. (Davant), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:35 (twenty-two years ago)
The interesting thing is that the people who broke into the lab were tipped off by a janitor and when the people at the science dept. realised what they had in their hands they asked the FBI to track them down as they knew the public should never learn of what was going on...
I think that all vivisection should be banned, it's morally reprehensible.
― C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― …, Monday, 12 January 2004 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)
Yeah, you're probably right in general. But in this particular case, it was pretty much indistinguishable. We shouldn't be naive about these practises, anyway.
C-Man, I don't know enough about alternatives, but vivisection on the face of it sure doesn't make me feel too good. By definition, I imagine most people lie somewhere in between the zealots on both sides, and would welcome some genuine alternatives to using live animals (cell cultures? computer models?).
Also, the rhetoric on both sides needs to simmer down. It hasn't changed one iota since I knew these animal rights activists in the '80s, ffs! And PETA's public image over here is not entirely due to a hostile media spin. Like the ALF, they must share the blame there (i.e./ pic your battles, people).
― David A. (Davant), Monday, 12 January 2004 21:26 (twenty-two years ago)
i also think that berating people for not agreeing with you converts no one. ever.
― gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:09 (twenty-two years ago)
There are other things apart from this that research is done for, often with great success. Better/safer medications for diabetes, for example - ONES THAT NO LONGER NEED TO USE ANIMAL BYPRODUCT. Funny, that.
Also C-Man, I have only one question whenever anyone brings up this topic - do you eschew ALL pharmaceuticals and other scientific treatments when you are ill because of this stance? If not, please explain how you reconcile being against animals in medical research vs you taking convenient advantage of "someone else" doing so.
― Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:35 (twenty-two years ago)
Now:
http://www.defeatism.co.uk/chimpinsuit.gif
― Ferrrrrrg (Ferg), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:39 (twenty-two years ago)
I don't purchase or use any medication that is from companies that still use animal models if that is what you are asking. And, yes, I've pissed my doctor off royally with that.
P.S. I'll get back to you on the diabetes thing but as far as I know animal models have not been used in many cases of finding cures for this, but I'd need to double check my facts.
― C-Man (C-Man), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― C-Man (C-Man), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 00:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 01:07 (twenty-two years ago)
What the everloving fuck?
Sincerely, Nate
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 01:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 02:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 02:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 02:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Bob Shaw (Bob Shaw), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 10:30 (twenty-two years ago)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3432531.stm
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― omg, Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:44 (twenty-two years ago)
That's what I fnd disturbing.
― caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 12:06 (twenty-two years ago)
Best Calum thread ever
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:11 (eighteen years ago)
28 months later
― That one guy that quit, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:15 (eighteen years ago)
I actually care more about the fact that amongst an intakle of 11,000 Cambridge University currently contains just 74 black students. -- Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, January 12, 2004 4:49 PM (3 years ago) Bookmark Link
75 now.
Lewis Hamilton has truly changed the world
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:15 (eighteen years ago)
black people hate Cambridge.
― Grandpont Genie, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:18 (eighteen years ago)
Massachusetts?
― C J, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:19 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.mtv.com/news/photos/g/grammy06/parties/goodmusic-kanye.jpg
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:20 (eighteen years ago)
Kanye's printer needs new ink
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:21 (eighteen years ago)
-- Dom Passantino, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:11 (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
RONG. Sleeper thread on ilm w/calum/julio epic flamewar or MSP thread (not started by cman admittedly) w/unbelivable stfu-pwnj of cman by ally are better.
― Pashmina, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:21 (eighteen years ago)
The problem with that thread is that although Calum gets pwnd, he gets pwnd by someone advocating MSP as a great band
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:24 (eighteen years ago)
You may be on shaky ground yourself a bit with that assertion, Dom.
― Pashmina, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:26 (eighteen years ago)
calum never mentioned pazz and jop as far as i'm aware
― acrobat, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:28 (eighteen years ago)
"If you want to fuck a dolphin mate then be my guest"
LOLOLO
I used jimmy mod's "makes yacking hand motion" thing on a mail list a couple of times a year or so ago and got the smackdown from the list moderator for it, haha.
― Pashmina, Friday, 6 July 2007 10:31 (eighteen years ago)