― MarkH (MarkH), Thursday, 22 January 2004 08:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Adrian (Adrian Langston), Thursday, 22 January 2004 08:59 (twenty-two years ago)
well it had to happen.
― MarkH (MarkH), Thursday, 22 January 2004 09:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 09:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Thursday, 22 January 2004 09:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Thursday, 22 January 2004 10:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Thursday, 22 January 2004 10:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 22 January 2004 10:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 10:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Thursday, 22 January 2004 10:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 22 January 2004 10:38 (twenty-two years ago)
God if you ever needed a reason not to wear burberry...
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 10:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alfie (Alfie), Thursday, 22 January 2004 11:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 11:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Thursday, 22 January 2004 11:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 12:07 (twenty-two years ago)
The reason for the Burberry/football hooligan tie in was due to when, in the 70s, Liverpool and Villa hooligans went into Europe, they'd always bring back brand name wear, and then be decked out as such when they were skirmishing on Saturdays. So thugs supporting teams that were never going to get into Europe started wearing Burberry, being as it was a British brand name of quite some expense.
Say what you want about hooligans, they're always pretty well turned out.
Also, quite a few British rappers namecheck Burberry in their songs, probably because its a British thug label now really.
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 22 January 2004 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 22 January 2004 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)
...x-post...
― sgs (sgs), Thursday, 22 January 2004 12:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 12:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 22 January 2004 12:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 12:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 22 January 2004 12:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 12:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 22 January 2004 12:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 12:52 (twenty-two years ago)
Since the relaunch of Burberry, it's taken a few years for the brand to niche with the big-hair crowd but they never, ever wear the plain old beige trench when they can get something which has been attacked by tartan. So the trench remains a preppy signifier.
My sister is into the Murakami Vuittons now. I can think of no greater indication that they're over. And no, she's no idea who Takashi Murakami is.
― suzy (suzy), Thursday, 22 January 2004 12:58 (twenty-two years ago)
So, are we anti-logo because of Naiomi Klien et al. Or because we all want to be individual, or because of an inbred-middle class distaste at flaunting wealth?
― Anna (Anna), Thursday, 22 January 2004 12:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Thursday, 22 January 2004 13:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 13:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Thursday, 22 January 2004 13:26 (twenty-two years ago)
i own no burberry.
― anthony, Thursday, 22 January 2004 13:27 (twenty-two years ago)
(Sarah, sorry for embarrassing you. All the time)
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 22 January 2004 13:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Thursday, 22 January 2004 13:35 (twenty-two years ago)
i like the burberry fragrance, but will not buy it because the bottle has the darn plaid on it.
and, thinking about anna's question, i used to be way into brand name labels. in middle school (12-14 years old) i was all about the CK and the DKNY and polo and all that. it was something that i just stopped enjoying one day, and left behind as something childish or whatever and now i really don't like paying extra money to wear something that is advertising a brand. (like, if i had enough money for a classic burberry trench, i'd buy it, because it doesn't scream burberry. but not with the lining)
― colette (a2lette), Thursday, 22 January 2004 13:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 22 January 2004 13:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alfie (Alfie), Thursday, 22 January 2004 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)
#6 is on up there.
― Stuart (Stuart), Thursday, 22 January 2004 14:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 22 January 2004 14:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― sgs (sgs), Thursday, 22 January 2004 14:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― test2, Thursday, 22 January 2004 16:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― lyra (lyra), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alfie (Alfie), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― dean! (deangulberry), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― dean! (deangulberry), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― dean! (deangulberry), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 22 January 2004 18:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Thursday, 22 January 2004 18:09 (twenty-two years ago)
yes, there have been a few. basic male/female varieties, plus something called "weekend" that is assumably for your getaways to the country. the stuff for ladies is nasty, really sweet and floral - tuberose, perhaps?
― lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 22 January 2004 18:48 (twenty-two years ago)
all threads should be individualised in this manner.
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 22 January 2004 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Stuart (Stuart), Thursday, 22 January 2004 18:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Thursday, 22 January 2004 18:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― phil-two (phil-two), Thursday, 22 January 2004 18:57 (twenty-two years ago)
right on, m.
― lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 22 January 2004 19:09 (twenty-two years ago)
On the other hand, a couple years ago I bought a cashmere scarf that is a not-too-good Burberry knockoff, and when I go to the Virginia outlet mall that has a Burberry store I always stop in to see if they have something that I like and can afford. The pink version of their plaid is really pretty. And I want to get some fabric that reasonably approximates the camel tartan, to make myself a skirt...both for any remaining status and to taunt Burberry, because they probably don't want someone my size wearing their trademarks.
As for good basic trench coats, Burberry or other labels, those have become so classic that they will never go out of style.
― j.lu (j.lu), Thursday, 22 January 2004 19:10 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm really sick of Burberry scarves here in NY. I see about a million of them every day. Literally.
― Aaron W (Aaron W), Thursday, 22 January 2004 19:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kim (Kim), Friday, 23 January 2004 00:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― colette (a2lette), Friday, 23 January 2004 11:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 23 January 2004 11:26 (twenty-two years ago)
In other words, hoolie style leaders started wearing it, and then it got appropriated by every little skinhead wannabe with their crap white trainers, adidas tracksuit bottoms tuucked into their socks and large branded sweatshirt. The burberry cap just tops it off and is usually as snide as they come. I'd estimate that 80% of the burberry stuff you see being worn on the hight street is fresh from Thailand's markets. You'll barely see the caps (or other burberry checks) on the main bad lads who simply want to blend in with the crowd yet be rather stylish. I have no idea what they're wearing now though, it's been a while since I went to a game with them present.
― chris (chris), Friday, 23 January 2004 11:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 23 January 2004 11:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― chris (chris), Friday, 23 January 2004 11:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 23 January 2004 11:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― chris (chris), Friday, 23 January 2004 11:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 23 January 2004 11:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 23 January 2004 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 23 January 2004 11:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― chris (chris), Friday, 23 January 2004 11:52 (twenty-two years ago)
^O^
― eriik, Friday, 23 January 2004 12:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 16 November 2004 07:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― phil-two (phil-two), Tuesday, 16 November 2004 07:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 16 November 2004 08:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 16 November 2004 09:16 (twenty-one years ago)