So! Remember that whole Gay Marriage Poll thing?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
What happens when your poll doesn't get the response you wanted? Why, just trash the fucking thing:
Gay Marriage Poll Gets Annulled

By Daniel Terdiman -- 02:00 AM Jan. 22, 2004 PT

When the American Family Association posted an online poll last month asking its constituents their position on gay marriage, it thought it was engaging in a straightforward exercise.

The conservative organization supports a constitutional amendment defining marriage as strictly between a man and a woman, and it planned to forward to Congress the results of the poll, which it expected would support its position, as evidence of Americans' opposition to gay marriage.

[...]

"We're very concerned that the traditional state of marriage is under threat in our country by homosexual activists," said AFA representative Buddy Smith. "It just so happens that homosexual activist groups around the country got a hold of the poll -- it was forwarded to them -- and they decided to have a little fun, and turn their organizations around the country (onto) the poll to try to cause it to represent something other than what we wanted it to. And so far, they succeeded with that."

Of course, no such poll can be said to represent an accurate picture of popular opinion. But, clearly, the AFA had hoped Congress would take the numbers it planned to produce as exactly that kind of evidence.

Now, Smith says, his organization has had to abandon its goal of taking the poll to Capitol Hill.

"We made the decision early on not to do that," Smith admitted, "because of how, as I say, the homosexual activists around the country have done their number on it..."

So, they wanted to rig up some evidence that the American Electorate wasn't supportive of gay marriages, but an honest, decent, not-at-all-loaded poll was thwarted by "homosexual activists"?
Wait, i thought that most conservative groups held that gay people weren't that large a subsection of the U.S.? Also, since the results weren't to their liking, the results are thereby to be ignored as irrelevant?

Huggy Dork (Kingfish), Thursday, 22 January 2004 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Hmm, this sounds familiar...I'm thinking of Florida.

Luigi Vampa (Horace Mann), Thursday, 22 January 2004 16:28 (twenty-two years ago)

But the AFA never counted on the power of the Internet. And once the URL to the poll escaped its intended audience, everything went haywire. As of Jan. 19, 60 percent of respondents -- more than 508,000 voters -- said, "I favor legalization of homosexual marriage." With an additional 7.89 percent -- or 66,732 voters -- replying, "I favor a 'civil union' with the full benefits of marriage except for the name," the AFA's chosen position, "I oppose legalization of homosexual marriage and 'civil unions,'" was being defeated by a 2-1 ratio.

Huggy Dork (Kingfish), Thursday, 22 January 2004 16:29 (twenty-two years ago)

"intended audience"... hilarious! why they didn't just start a petition like everyone else is beyond me.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:27 (twenty-two years ago)

So what, they're saying their own activist network when it comes to poll-flooding sucks?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Too busy flooding lefty polls.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:29 (twenty-two years ago)

How proactive.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Their own "activist network" was too preoccupied with the dildos in their asses. (Did I say that?)

Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:34 (twenty-two years ago)

I love how they have a prayer network so AFA lackeys can be praying for the AFA to be victorious around the clock! They even have a menu of hourly blocks that you can sign up for so that you can be one of the prayer partners for that hour! OMFNG http://www.afa.net/prayer/Default.asp

dean! (deangulberry), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Sounds like a good timewaster to me! (For them that is.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm proud to be a homosexual activist!!

Kerry (dymaxia), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm proud to be an active homosexualist!

Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm proud. *preens*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:47 (twenty-two years ago)

No, I meant, I'm homosexual to be a proud activist!

Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:48 (twenty-two years ago)

That's exactly right!

Kerry (dymaxia), Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I hoped they learned a lesson - the internet is useless when promoting partial-birth parental consent civil unions. Damn darkhorse, lameduck liberaltarians.

andy, Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:56 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah! why dont they go back to africa where they can smoke all the crack they want

bike, Thursday, 22 January 2004 17:58 (twenty-two years ago)

"It just so happens that homosexual activist groups around the country got a hold of the poll -- it was forwarded to them -- and they decided to have a little fun..."

This statement actually quite irks me, like any activist group with a favorable-to-the-AFA-agenda taking action are doing so because it's a cause they believe in, but when homosexual-rights activist-groups do it's in their minds just "to have a little fun". WTF?

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 22 January 2004 18:01 (twenty-two years ago)

It's all coded language. 'Homosexuals' are all about mindless hedonism.

The question is - do they really believe this crap, or do they simply think that their supporters are dumb enough to believe it? Surely they know that the thing ended up in lots of peoples' e-mails and they just casually voted on it?

Kerry (dymaxia), Thursday, 22 January 2004 18:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Homosexuals only seem like they only do things "to have a little fun" because they do everything with thuch thtylish pithath!

Luigi Vampa (Horace Mann), Thursday, 22 January 2004 18:09 (twenty-two years ago)

"they decided to have a little fun, and turn their organizations around the country (onto) the poll to try to cause it to represent something other than what we wanted it to. And so far, they succeeded with that."

How dare they!

Ferrrrrrg (Ferg), Thursday, 22 January 2004 18:15 (twenty-two years ago)

But, but, they tried to make it say stuff that the AFA didn't want it to say, when it was the AFA's toy and not theirs! That's so meeeeeean!

cis (cis), Thursday, 22 January 2004 18:19 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.