― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 23 January 2004 23:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Saturday, 24 January 2004 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Saturday, 24 January 2004 00:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― B61 (calstars), Saturday, 24 January 2004 00:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Saturday, 24 January 2004 00:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Leee Majors (Leee), Saturday, 24 January 2004 07:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Broheems (diamond), Saturday, 24 January 2004 07:44 (twenty-two years ago)
But he gave one to Bin Laden, who was fighting the Soviets at the time, and look what happened!
― Momus (Momus), Saturday, 24 January 2004 09:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― the river fleet, Saturday, 24 January 2004 14:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Saturday, 24 January 2004 14:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 24 January 2004 14:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Saturday, 24 January 2004 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)
Asked whether Microsoft missed the boat in the field of search technology, Mr Gates admitted that he had to take the blame for losing out to Google.
"We took an approach that I now realise was wrong," he said.
"Our strategy was to do a good job on the 80% of common queries and ignore the other stuff."
Mr Gates claimed that Microsoft was better on the 80% of common queries, although Google was "pretty good" as well.
"But that's not what counts. It's the remaining 20% that counts... because that's where the quality perception is."
Google was "way better", he said, for people investigating a rare disease, exploring a hobby, or searching for a specific restaurant.
He praised the "high level of IQ" at Google's research team, but said "we will catch them".
Gotta catch 'em all, Bill! Why not Apple too? They're positioned right in that 'high level of IQ', 20% market you thought you could ignore, then realised you had to take over! Oh, but you did that already.
― Momus (Momus), Saturday, 24 January 2004 17:49 (twenty-two years ago)
This just makes me think of Ford cars.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 January 2004 18:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Saturday, 24 January 2004 18:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 January 2004 18:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 24 January 2004 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)
It's in the MoMA when the whole place is up and running. In the Smithsonian too, I think...
― ModJ (ModJ), Saturday, 24 January 2004 19:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Saturday, 24 January 2004 19:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Saturday, 24 January 2004 19:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Saturday, 24 January 2004 19:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 24 January 2004 19:44 (twenty-two years ago)
Well... no...
― ModJ (ModJ), Saturday, 24 January 2004 19:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― the river fleet, Saturday, 24 January 2004 22:05 (twenty-two years ago)
The evolution went Apple II+, Mac II, IIsi, Quadra 840av, Power Mac 8100, PowerBook G3 (Pismo), PowerBook G4/400, PowerBook G4/1GHz
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Saturday, 24 January 2004 22:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jay Vee (Manon_70), Saturday, 24 January 2004 23:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jay Vee (Manon_70), Saturday, 24 January 2004 23:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Sunday, 25 January 2004 01:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Sunday, 25 January 2004 07:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Sunday, 25 January 2004 13:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Sunday, 25 January 2004 15:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― the river fleet, Sunday, 25 January 2004 16:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 25 January 2004 16:37 (twenty-two years ago)
Hoooooo!
― Jay Vee (Manon_70), Sunday, 25 January 2004 16:49 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/online/comment/story/0,12449,1131215,00.html
― Momus (Momus), Monday, 26 January 2004 05:36 (twenty-two years ago)