Now, anti-globilisation is all well and good (no nike or adidas or gap), but I've heard some people come out with an enormous amount of crap about all this (no Body Shop? Just cos they're big? Calm down, dear) and so certainly am not going to rely on ill-referenced websites to guide me in the right direction. I ceratinly will hop aboard the anti-Nestle bandwagon if the wagon is just and pure, but if the wagon is just being bitchy I don't think I'll bother.
― Johnney B (Johnney B), Sunday, 25 January 2004 09:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 25 January 2004 10:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 25 January 2004 10:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Johnney B (Johnney B), Sunday, 25 January 2004 10:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Sunday, 25 January 2004 10:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― jack cole (jackcole), Sunday, 25 January 2004 10:09 (twenty-two years ago)
Then again, last time I remembered driving, I still refused to go to Texaco stations because of the whole racial discrimination incidents from many years ago... and Exxon for obvious reasons. So, hey, never forgive never forgot for some I gues.
― donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 25 January 2004 10:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Johnney B (Johnney B), Sunday, 25 January 2004 10:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 25 January 2004 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Johnney B (Johnney B), Sunday, 25 January 2004 12:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 25 January 2004 12:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Sunday, 25 January 2004 13:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Al_Ewing, Sunday, 25 January 2004 14:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 26 January 2004 01:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 26 January 2004 01:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Monday, 26 January 2004 01:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 26 January 2004 01:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Monday, 26 January 2004 01:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Cathy (Cathy), Monday, 26 January 2004 01:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Monday, 26 January 2004 01:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 26 January 2004 01:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Monday, 26 January 2004 01:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 26 January 2004 01:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Monday, 26 January 2004 02:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Monday, 26 January 2004 04:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 26 January 2004 04:36 (twenty-two years ago)
I don't buy Nestle because of the old thrid world thing. Though I stopped buying their stuff so long ago I'm not even sure how up to date this is anymore.
― C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 26 January 2004 04:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 26 January 2004 05:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Monday, 26 January 2004 05:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Johnney B (Johnney B), Monday, 26 January 2004 05:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Monday, 26 January 2004 05:52 (twenty-two years ago)
*raises hand*
― donut bitch (donut), Monday, 26 January 2004 06:02 (twenty-two years ago)
But they are. How can something be wrong when it tastes so good?
― Johnney B (Johnney B), Monday, 26 January 2004 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 26 January 2004 09:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 26 January 2004 10:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Monday, 26 January 2004 10:34 (twenty-two years ago)
i fear hypocrisy/double-standards is unavoidable with regards to boycotting brands.
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 January 2004 10:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 26 January 2004 10:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 26 January 2004 11:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 January 2004 12:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 26 January 2004 12:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Monday, 26 January 2004 12:12 (twenty-two years ago)
The Kit-Kat issue is often the first inklings of a burgeoning political consciousness. Principles vs compromise in action.
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 26 January 2004 12:14 (twenty-two years ago)
Various Fair Trade organisations are working to try to get these laws changed and if you shop at the Co-op, or Oxfam, or your local Amnesty shop, you can help by paying slightly over the odds for coffee or chocolate that helps people climb out of the poverty trap.
Course, it's all a matter of priority. Like someone said above, Jarvis doesn't think that vivisection is as big a deal as Fair Trade. I had a huge argument with a guy from Greenpeace once who claimed that all Fair Trade advocates were raping the world's natural resources by encouraging people to buy products that come from far away lands instead of buying stuff that's made locally (this cutting down on pollution). You have to pick your battles.
― trishyb, Monday, 26 January 2004 13:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― the river fleet, Monday, 26 January 2004 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 26 January 2004 14:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 26 January 2004 14:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 26 January 2004 14:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Leee Majors (Leee), Monday, 26 January 2004 22:42 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.glico.co.jp/pocky/pocky/gifs/mens/img01_i.gif
― donut bitch (donut), Monday, 26 January 2004 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jon Williams (ex machina), Monday, 26 January 2004 22:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 14:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― prima fassy (bob), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)
ballin' your eyes out
― prima fassy (bob), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:20 (twenty-two years ago)
shaq sez: GET CRUNCHY. VERY CRUNCHY
― prima fassy (bob), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jon Williams (ex machina), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 17:22 (twenty-two years ago)
beware of the 'made locally' argument. a lot of products that you assume are manufactured just up the road have their sources further away than you might think. i live just up the road from cadburys, but i'm willing to bet that they don't grow their cocoa in birmingham.
a lot of companies will import products rather than have them locally produced, because its cheaper to do so (no worker rights, easier to exploit those with little means of defending themselves legally) - for example, and going off on a tangent rather, a large number of chickens sold in the uk are from the far east - hence the rather larger prominence of 'bird flu' articles on news bulletins than you might expect from the uk's rather euro-centric (and america-centric, if that's a real word) media.
― hobart paving (hobart paving), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 17:37 (twenty-two years ago)
of course, nestle don't make chickens. not to my knowledge. but, from what i've read, there's a certain amount of exploitation in the cocoa-growing industry. so, baby milk or otherwise, there's reason to dislike them.
i'll go and find some evidence to back myself up, if you would like some.
― hobart paving (hobart paving), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 17:40 (twenty-two years ago)
more of the same, slavery in the ivory coast, where nestle (and other chocolate manufacturers) purchase much of their cocoa.
http://www.garstangfairtrade.org.uk/chocolate_and_slavery.htm
comments on nestle in particular:
http://www.corporatewatch.org.uk/profiles/food_supermarkets/nestle/nestle1.html
nestle suing the ethiopian government:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,862570,00.html
an addendum to the last one - nestle eventually settled for 1.5 million pounds, and donated the money to famine relief. i believe that this was due to extensive public pressure rather than any altruistic tendencies on the part of the company - but you make up your own mind..
― hobart paving (hobart paving), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 18:05 (twenty-two years ago)
..but if they did, they'd proabably be the best chickens in the world.
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 18:06 (twenty-two years ago)
Haha, I'm sure all the folks here in Seattle, you know with the obvious abundance of coffee bean plantations that plaster Washington state, have that choice of civic duty.
(Point being: usually Fair Trade vs. non-Fair Trade issues stand on products where there is no local abundance of said product. That said, perhaps, that's different depending on the product, but last I checked, the U.S. isn't exactly overflowing with coffee bean plantations even in the South, much less the North.. just to choose an example... so my briefer pointer is: that Greenpeace guy = mentalist)
― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 20:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 23:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kirsty H, Thursday, 12 February 2004 01:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 12 February 2004 01:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 12 February 2004 01:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 12 February 2004 02:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Thursday, 12 February 2004 03:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― jeremy jordan (cruisy), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 11:05 (twenty years ago)
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 11:18 (twenty years ago)
wow, that's fucked!
re. the greenpeace guy who was all, the pollution involved in bringing over cofee, sugar, etc, means that fair trade => still EVIL. is insanely great. kind of: all of human history was wrong!! or maybe, more charitably: bring back sails! down with engines!
― N_RQ, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 11:35 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:38 (twenty years ago)
[plotting... analyzing... ][plotting... analyzing... ][plotting... analyzing... ]
― do knut (donut), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)
I think this man is the devil himself
http://www.bitterwallet.com/nestle-dont-think-water-is-a-human-right/64369
― Elvis was a hero to most but he never her (ledge), Friday, 19 April 2013 08:27 (thirteen years ago)
yeah i saw this. his rationale is eye-popping
― pssstttt, Hey you (dog latin), Friday, 19 April 2013 08:33 (thirteen years ago)
he is the end of the world
― Winningest franchise club of the day (imago), Friday, 19 April 2013 22:16 (thirteen years ago)
whatcha gonna do about it?
― davey, Saturday, 20 April 2013 20:38 (thirteen years ago)
he's probably a fifty year-old man too, aye
― tsarnaev paleface (imago), Saturday, 20 April 2013 21:52 (thirteen years ago)