Insane baby chicken Easter dyeing madness!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Look, I tell you!

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40024000/jpg/_40024545_chicks203ap.jpg

I bet they don't keep quiet when you try and hide them under cushions for Easter morning hunts, though. And hard boiling them would seem counterproductive.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 April 2004 22:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Jesus...

ModJ (ModJ), Friday, 9 April 2004 22:53 (twenty-two years ago)

this was done regularly in the 50s (and earlier I presume).

My mom received one every Easter. But then of course they'd get big and become ugly, smelly chickens. She still loved them though.

One year, on a long summer car trip, they stopped by the side of the road for a picnic. When they were almost finished with the cold fried chicken my young mother was informed of the fate of her most recent Easter chick.

Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Friday, 9 April 2004 22:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Now them's good eating!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 April 2004 22:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Giving birds as Easter gifts is WRONG, people. If they're ducks, they usually get abandoned in a public pond somewhere, where IF they survive, they grow up with gangs of other cast-off and misfit ducks. I know that sounds ridiculous but it's actually faintly sad -- these ducks are insufficiently socialized and never go anywhere without the other cast-offs, and since they're weird they never get to mate.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Friday, 9 April 2004 23:42 (twenty-two years ago)

(Let me point out the obvious before everyone else does -- it's like high school! Ha! It's funny!)

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Friday, 9 April 2004 23:44 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.mrbreakfast.com/images/rip2.jpg

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 April 2004 23:53 (twenty-two years ago)

The dye, which the farm insists does not contain chemicals, is injected into ordinary chicken eggs a few weeks before Easter.

The baby chicks are not hurt, but provide a psychedelic spectacle when they hatch.

Disturbing? Slightly.

Cute? Absolutely!

But this is what really worries me:

"One little boy came with his kindergarten last week and when he was asked how the chick became blue, said it was because it had a blue mother," said Ms Burney.

He asks a perfectly reasonable question and this is the response he gets from the teacher? And people wonder why test scores keep getting lower and lower?

Travelin' Smith, Saturday, 10 April 2004 15:37 (twenty-two years ago)

PUNK CHIX ROOL!!!!

Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Saturday, 10 April 2004 15:47 (twenty-two years ago)

If they're ducks, they usually get abandoned in a public pond somewhere, where IF they survive, they grow up with gangs of other cast-off and misfit ducks. I know that sounds ridiculous but it's actually faintly sad -- these ducks are insufficiently socialized and never go anywhere without the other cast-offs,

I'll cut you in for half when Pixar picks the screenplay up.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 10 April 2004 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought I saw this on the news as I was flicking channels yesterday. And I thought "No, it can't be true". But I'm glad it is true. How adorable.

Cathy (Cathy), Saturday, 10 April 2004 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)

"One little boy came with his kindergarten last week and when he was asked how the chick became blue, said it was because it had a blue mother," said Ms Burney.

He asks a perfectly reasonable question and this is the response he gets from the teacher? And people wonder why test scores keep getting lower and lower?

read a bit more carefully my dear, the boy was asked this question and he responded that the chick had a blue mother.

Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Saturday, 10 April 2004 22:20 (twenty-two years ago)

But how did he find out it had a blue mother?

Aja (aja), Saturday, 10 April 2004 22:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Kids say the darndest things

rainy (rainy), Saturday, 10 April 2004 22:31 (twenty-two years ago)

aja, it didn't have a blue mother.

Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Saturday, 10 April 2004 23:05 (twenty-two years ago)

read a bit more carefully my dear, the boy was asked this question and he responded that the chick had a blue mother.

my bad

my brain tends to disregard the word 'was'.... or at least that's the excuse i'm goin' with

Travelin' Smith, Saturday, 10 April 2004 23:54 (twenty-two years ago)

chicken segregation

Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 11 April 2004 00:12 (twenty-two years ago)

aja, it didn't have a blue mother.

I know that. I was just wondering if someone at the farm told the little boy the chick had a blue mother.

Aja (aja), Sunday, 11 April 2004 13:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Aja, it had a green mother, instead. Life's funny that way.

Kingfish Balzac (Kingfish), Sunday, 11 April 2004 15:10 (twenty-two years ago)

So, was her other chick yellow then?

Aja (aja), Sunday, 11 April 2004 15:33 (twenty-two years ago)

although I'm being quite pedantic here let me state clearly what that quote implied: the boy using his natural ability to logically reason out the world around him assumed the mother had to be blue.

Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Sunday, 11 April 2004 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)

You sure someone at the farm didn't tell him the chick had a blue mother? Maybe they explained to the children that they put dye in the eggs and he wasn't listening?

Aja (aja), Sunday, 11 April 2004 16:31 (twenty-two years ago)

*slaps forehead*

Ask For Samantha (thatgirl), Sunday, 11 April 2004 16:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Aja, have you ever noticed that children often have difficulty understanding things, and will concoct silly explanations for them?

Tep (ktepi), Sunday, 11 April 2004 16:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, sometimes. But usually, when you're really young, you'll ask "why" something is the way it is.

Aja (aja), Sunday, 11 April 2004 16:57 (twenty-two years ago)

'It had a blue mother' is not a silly explanation. It's a pretty rational one, given the evidence.

cis (cis), Sunday, 11 April 2004 17:02 (twenty-two years ago)

It's certainly better than "because God made it that way"

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 11 April 2004 17:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Recessive genes people!

Markelby (Mark C), Sunday, 11 April 2004 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Gene who?
</compulsary joke>

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 11 April 2004 17:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I think the irony slipped right by you there, cis.

Tep (ktepi), Sunday, 11 April 2004 17:55 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.