october surprise: bin laden in china?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Bin Laden is in China

This confirms Gordon Thomas, a journalist with contacts in the most important
intelligence services. The terrorist had reached an agreement with China,
which now negotiates its surrender with Bush. It is his greatest electoral
trick.

Translated from HREF="http://www.el-mundo.es/cronica/2004/469/1097487207.html">El Mundo

Gordon Thomas

10/13/04 "
El Mundo
" -- During the home stretch of the Northamerican elections, Osama
bin Laden could prove to be the ace in the sleeve of president Bush. As we
speak, Washington is negotiating a highly secretive agreement with Beijing, the
Chinese capital, for the eviction of bin Laden from his sanctuary in the
turbulent Muslim provinces of China, in the Northwest of the Great Wall nation.

More than five million people, many of them fanatic followers of Osama, live
in that region, which can be called one of the most volatile regions of Earth.
Thousands of them work for the mafias who specialize in the trafficking of
humans and drugs to the West. Last summer, Bin Laden sealed an agreement with
the authorities in Beijing, in which he was granted asylum in return for his
guarantees that the guerilla war of the Muslim Chinese against the Chinese
nation
would end.

Over the years, tens of thousands of troops of the Popular Liberation Armee
had been sent to the region with the intent to squash the insurgents.

Since the arrival of the Saudi Osama Bin Laden, the region has been
relatively quiet, and the Muslims who live there are allowed to continue their
trafficking of humans and drugs.

However, Bin Laden could now see himself trapped in his refuge, if an
extraordinary agreement between Beijing and Washington would come to pass, in
which
China would hand over to the United States the most wanted terrorist in the
world.

The capture of Bin Laden would virtually guarantee the reelection of George
Bush Jr., as it would confirm to the millions of undecided voters of the U.S.
that the war against terrorism was justified after Bin Laden had authorized the
attacks of 9/11 against New York and Washington.

"A new administration Bush would present China as its great new ally in the
war against terrorism. China would enjoy in Washington the status of a most
favored nation with all of its facets. Contracts worth hundreds of millions of
dollars would be approved by fast track. The history of human rights violations
in China would be ignored," confirmed last week a high-level representative of
the Pentagon. He added that only a small number of "members of very high
rank" in the Bush administration knew about the plan to "seize Bin Laden in
exchange for a special relationship with China." With almost certainty, among
them
would be the vice-president, Dick Cheney, and the defense secretary, Donald
Rumsfeld.

Agreeing to speak under anonymity, the functionary offered details of the
plan to capture Osama Bin Laden as a means to keep Bush in the White House. He
explained that this is not the first time that an American administration has
resorted to similar maneuvers during an electoral campaign.

Towards the end of the presidency of Jimmy Carter, a secret deal was signed
between the then future president of the U.S., Ronald Reagan, and Iran, in
which the American diplomats, who had been kidnapped in Teheran, the Capital of
Iran, would be freed the very day that Ronald Reagan would be inaugurated to the

White House.

According to Ari Ben-Menashe, the former national security advisor of the
Israeli government of Yitzhak Shamir, " they paid an enormous sum of money to
the
Ayatollas of Iran." Ben-Menashe affirms that this deal formed a pivotal piece
in the negotiations that later became known as Reagan's October surprise.


Theresa on the campaign trail

Theresa, the wife of the senator and democratic candidate, John Kerry, gave
to understand that another October surprise could be imminent. Two weeks ago,
she surprised the political advisors of her husband by declaring in public: "I
wouldn't be surprised if, prior to the elections, president Bush were to
capture Osama." Since then, Mrs. Kerry rejected to further comment on her
explosive
declaration. However, there are rumors in the intelligence community that
both she and her husband had been advised that any further comments concerning
an
agreement that would include the capture of Bin Laden could comprimise the
national security of the U.S.

Furthermore, also the Washington analyst, Al Santoli, the national security
advisor and Californian Congressman, Dana Rohrabacher, and the editor of the
respected bulletin China Monitor, affirmed that "an October surprise wouldn't
surprise me in the least."

In his first confirmed sighting in many months, the refuge of Bin Laden has
been pinpointed by an NSA satellite, one of many that the supersecret U.S.
agency utilizes in their search for him. His hideout is located near a lake at
the
border between China and Pakistan.

At the other side of the Zaskar mountains, the white summits that
majestically look out over Bin Laden's sanctuary, a detachment of special forces
of the
Pakistani and U.S. armies are awaiting orders to capture Bin Laden, and move
him by plane to Pakistan.


Escorted by 50 guerillas

During the last six months, Bin Laden has been sighted several times in the
mountains and open ranges of the Northwest. American intelligence agents in the
region are of the opinion that the Saudi millionaire, accompanied by an
escort of 50 guerilla mujaheddin, moved East towards Cachemira, and from there
crossed into China.

The agents furthermore believe that, previously, Bin Laden held various
meetings with high officials of Beijing. He convinced them that he would be
capable
of obtaining peace in their Muslim provinces. "We know about these meetings,"
confirmed Mansur Ahmed, police chief of Bandipoor, North of Cachemira.
"However, they took place on Chinese territory."

Bin Laden is accompanied by Ayan al-Zawahiri, his primary advisor and
personal physician (Bin Laden suffers from a serious renal ailment). Al-Zawahiri
is a
surgeon, educated in Cairo, accused of terrosrism in Egypt, and condemned to
death for rebellion. After Bin Laden, he is the second most wanted terrorist
world-wide.

White House sources reject to comment on this issue publicly. "If the
negotiations should fail, this would not be the most suitable moment for the
president to be seen directly involved in these negotiations," affirmed one
source.

It is believed that the possibility for such a deal emerged early this year,
after Donald Rumsfeld had met with a delegation of the Chinese government
during a visit to the far East. Later, George Tenet, then director of the CIA,
requested a viability study for an operation to capture Bin Laden. Tenet was
informed that the only possibility would be if they could count on the
cooperation
of the Chinese.

"To what extent that collaboration will occur in the few weeks remaining
until the elections, will depend to a good extent on the confidence that Bush
can
inspire in the Chinese that he will be able to live up to his promises,"
confirmed the functionary of the Pentagon.

==============================

SUBMITTED BY:
From: EaglesRetired
Subject: Bin Laden is in China
Date: 10/14/04 2:57 PM EST

Sometimes I'll Believe Anything, Friday, 15 October 2004 16:44 (twenty-one years ago)

"During the homestretch of the Northamerican elections"???

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 15 October 2004 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)

We annexed Canada!

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 15 October 2004 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)

then why are we allowing them elections? Do they have a January deadline like Iraq?

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 15 October 2004 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)

We shd double-check w/ Prime Minister Dave Foley.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 15 October 2004 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)

oh well, nice try Kerry.

Hari Ashurst (Toaster), Friday, 15 October 2004 16:53 (twenty-one years ago)

However, there are rumors in the intelligence community that
both she and her husband had been advised that any further comments concerning an agreement that would include the capture of Bin Laden could comprimise the national security of the U.S.

At least this story is entertaining bullshit.

George Smith, Friday, 15 October 2004 17:59 (twenty-one years ago)

The title of this thread sounds like a really bad "Debbie Does Dallas"-esque porno.

n/a (Nick A.), Friday, 15 October 2004 18:04 (twenty-one years ago)

At least this story is entertaining bullshit.

why?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 15 October 2004 18:06 (twenty-one years ago)

"George Bush, Jr."?

Casuistry (Chris P), Friday, 15 October 2004 18:16 (twenty-one years ago)

...a detachment of special forces of the Pakistani and U.S. armies are awaiting orders to capture Bin Laden, and move him by plane to Pakistan.

Ah, if it were this easy, we'd already have him.

Aimless (Aimless), Friday, 15 October 2004 18:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Gordon Thomas, author of this article, is a right wing author specialising in sensational conspiracy theories. In the 90s he published a book about links between the Freemasons and the Vatican. Before 9/11 happened he was working on a book which basically followed the then-current thinking that China was shaping up to be America's main enemy. This book was published in early 2002 as 'Seeds of Fire -- China and the story behind the attack on America', but despite the title only a few pages at the end, obviously hastily tacked on after 9/11 happened, link Al Qaeda with China. Thomas, whose biggest fan is David Icke, would obviously love there to be a Bin Laden China connection almost as much as Bush would love Bin Laden to appear, suddenly, this October. But wishing don't make it so.

Momus (Momus), Friday, 15 October 2004 18:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Ah, so the Gary North of a different context, then.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 15 October 2004 18:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Here's a lovely review of 'Seeds of Fire' from one of Thomas' satisfied customers on the Amazon site:

'Thomas scores yet another victory in his newest tome. He lays bare, for anyone brave enough for the truth, the real threat China poses to the United States of America. Thomas makes the case that by 2015 we'll be eating more rice, fewer burgers and be driving rickshaws instead of Mercedes and Fords. That is, if the radiation levels are low enough to allow freedom of movement. This is a must read. Clearly, the WTC attack was just the beginning. With China poised to stike, books like this will prepare us for the dark future which lies ahead.'

Momus (Momus), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:21 (twenty-one years ago)

HAHAHAHAHA

Rickshaws!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:24 (twenty-one years ago)

remember the seinfeld w/the rickshaws? classic!

Emilymv (Emilymv), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:28 (twenty-one years ago)

yes, China is a favorite obsession of hawks, wingnuts and nativists, but I don't think there's any denying that it (and India, perhaps) poses a serious threat to American superpower status. Especially if Bush wins this election.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:28 (twenty-one years ago)

It's high time America's superpower status was threatened. I wish China was a nicer enemy, but what are ya gonna do.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)

In India they have autorickshaws, which are basically like motorbikes with a bench behind them, all covered by yellow tarp. They are awesome.

n/a (Nick A.), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:31 (twenty-one years ago)

It's high time America's superpower status was threatened.

We are an economic as well as a military superpower. I'm glad that you want people here not to be educated to gain the skills to compete in the future economy, reducing our standard of living, increasing our already large wealth disparity and encouraging crime and domestic radicalism and terrorism (while, perhaps, improving such things elsewhere in the world). And that you'd like to even the military power between us and a state unaccepting of many basic civil liberties.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)

and that you would like to hamper the world's leading scientific and medical community

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:36 (twenty-one years ago)

and political system

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm glad you like putting words in peoples' mouths, dipshit.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:40 (twenty-one years ago)

The world's leading political system?

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:42 (twenty-one years ago)

"Brothers, brothers, let us fight together against the common enemy!"

"THE JUDEAN PEOPLE'S FRONT?"

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm interested in why [email protected] posted this here in the first place.

Wolfgang Tillmans called one of his books 'If One Thing Matters, Everything Matters', which is a nice way for a photographer to explain how, looking at this, he's also thinking about that. Pointing your camera at something super-particular might be seen as excluding and ignoring everything else, but Tillmans' title explains that by looking at something specific and present, he's also thinking about everything that's absent and out of view. That's also a social model which proposes that if any human being matters, we all do.

But conspiracy theories propose the opposite. They take one thing, one big idea, and explain the whole world with it. Conspiracy theory says: 'If one thing matters, nothing else matters'. Conspiracy theory appeals to people who find the complexity of everything mattering in a small way too messy and confusing, who want just one thing to matter in a big, tidy (and incredible) way. Drama queens!

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 16 October 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

DON'T BAME ME, ME HUT MY TOOOOOEEEEE!!!

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 16 October 2004 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)

GONG!

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 16 October 2004 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)

So this is an excuse for somebody to go to war with China rather than Saudia Arabia?

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Saturday, 16 October 2004 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)

that and bootlegging! Finally a war KRS-One can get behind.

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 16 October 2004 14:59 (twenty-one years ago)

hahahaha

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 16 October 2004 17:58 (twenty-one years ago)

i thought most bootleggers where in Taiwan...

Sir Kingfish Beavis D'Azzmonch (Kingfish), Saturday, 16 October 2004 18:01 (twenty-one years ago)

History just Loops for Central Asia. what happens to afghanistan gets dumped on (chinese) east turkestan.

It's an interesting situation, if it's true. If Osama can ferment rebellion in East Turkestan he can destabilise China and damage the world economy, China being the main motor of the world economy (he's economically very astute). china doesn't need to be pacifying Kashgar right now, or any other regions that might size at any weakness.

(Oh and remeber the oil and gas field of Kazakstan and all the attempts at pan-turkism launched for that part of the world)

Ed (dali), Saturday, 16 October 2004 19:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Well now a former Navy Secretary has said they know exactly where Bin Laden is.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Saturday, 23 October 2004 19:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Bin Laden is south of Uranus, heading north.

Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Saturday, 23 October 2004 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Im sure we can thank our good friends the Pakistani's for our inability to go after bin Laden..

And if bin Laden is in China.. isnt a big part of the PNAC manifesto dedicated to make sure China is kept out of the superpower sweepstakes?

still bevens (bscrubbins), Saturday, 23 October 2004 19:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I would imagine Bin Ladin's hatred of communism would be matched by China's unwillingness to provoke the US, and have a dangerous man in their nation. Bin Ladin has a lot of money, but not enough that it would seriously impress China, and certainly not at the risk of the fallout that would come from them 'harbouring terrorists'.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Saturday, 23 October 2004 19:31 (twenty-one years ago)

"Northamerican" is probably translated as such because the Spanish word "norteamericano" confusingly often refers to just the USA.

jaymc (jaymc), Saturday, 23 October 2004 20:12 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.