Taking Sides: Anglicanism vs Catholicism

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Inspired by Anthony's anti-Narnia rantings. To this atheist, Anglicanism seems spineless but Catholicism seems mental. There's an attractive rigour to Catholicism which brings out the flagellant in me but on the other hand it's had a hand in vast amounts of suffering. Aesthetically it's got to win, though.

Tom, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Apologies if the flippancy of the question causes offence, but no apologies if the question itself does.

Tom, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

they are both a waste of good dress fabric

mark s, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

flippancy is the only suitable response to religion

catholicism, good dudey clothes and pics and that, nice line in oppression. anglicanism, nice scones and cheap stuff on the white elephant stall

gareth, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I personally find muskets and/or ICBMs a good response to religion.

Aargh! Forgot! Without religion - no art! No literature! No music!

Bugger that's that theory shot.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Anglicanism = The Optional Religion. The only branch of X-ianity where the Creed goes: I believe in A) god the father, B) god the son, C) the holy spirit or D) whatever I like, really, so long as I live a tasteful and decent life and contribute healthily to Altar Guild and Choir fund.

There are so many different branches (high church, low church, 1812 Prayerbook, whatever) that it's like Catholicism and Protestantism all mixed together. Which of course, defeats the purpose of either, which is that you believe what you believe fervently, because you must. It's like generic religion, and you pick the bits that suit you.

I am very confused by the issue, partly, I am sure, because I went to a "mixed" (half Anglican, half Catholic) prep school where each priest spent half the year trying to debunk the other's religion.

High Church Anglicans have better art, plain and simple. Because they have more money, and can afford better vestments, smellier insence, and prettier stained glass. Low Church Anglicans are tacky in their relentless tastefulness, while Catholicism, as beautiful as it is, requires you to actually MEAN IT, MAAAAAAAN.

kate, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

With Kate there, pretty much. Grew up Anglican and the best priest I ever knew was a total Monty Python fanatic. This helped in my own growing out of the religion anyway. ;-)

Yes, Catholicism looks prettier. From a distance.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

kate your mixed school is bonkers and hilarious!!

if had children i would send them to a a mixed science-vs-occult-spooky-rubbish school

mark s, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

if i had children, i'd send them down the pit

gareth, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Now maybe that's how you do things up in Bradford, Gareth, but down here we're civilised.

I will absolutely raise my children in a religion, preferably Anglican, as it's so tasteful. So that they will have something to rebel against in later life without actually causing any harm. My mum was raised by free-thinking atheist scientists, and during her mid- life crisis had a sudden and devout and life-altering conversion to HIGH CHURCH ANGLICANISM. God forbid that should to any offspring of mine.

Fuck, missed another train.

kate, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

My grandmother = staunch catholic, would take me to local Catholic church where the hymns were sung by omniscient American lady with guitar and random ragtag hippies as audience clapped along. Anglican church I sang at professionally = big motherfucking organ and men in robes and toupes reciting long passages while everyone stood and listened appreciatively. Therefore Catholism = Joni Mitchell and Anglicanism = Genesis.

That is all.

Tim, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

us mciks whoop proddy butt - any day, any time, we got purgatory, hell, poofy preiests and hwat have you anglos got...the fucking queen..mind you, if prince william needs me to cnvert so we can get married, i may have to believe this was not posted by me.

Geoff, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Are you starting early or late, Geoff?

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Don't C of E vicars say things like "If you want to 'get really on one', come to church! God is your Wonderwall - get 'sorted'!"

dave q, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

In terms of rebelling against, Anglicanism is probably better - because it's so fluid it teaches you guerilla warfare opposition, whereas Catholicism offers a lifelong death-struggle. Mind you, nobody ever used "Anglican guilt" as an excuse for their failings.

Tom, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Anglicanism is a great faith but it can be a bit stiff.

anthony, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'd have a One2One... with JESUS!

I am sure I have said the Bob the Builder/Christ the Carpenter thing here before, but it still is good for the belly yuXoRs. I'd also like to comment that a trip to Spain and many cathedral visits (lots of gory crucifixes and suffering) as a youth severely affected my mental state for a while. And then when I started listening to the HOLY BIBLE well oy vey, as they say in YIDDISH. I also used to go to a mad Latin only YOU SHALL PRAY ON YORE KNEES 4EVAH church for the majority of my years (why, another two hour chant in Latin, why not) so to me, you're all pretty much church ponces.

Sarah, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Anglicanism is such a terribly English theological fudge. Catholicism without the Pope for some, more traditional Protestantism for others, but mostly christianity for those not all that interested in religion. Catholicism at least has the courage of its convictions. Both are preferable to the Pentecostalism i was raised in.

stevo, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Methodism, which has historically (despite breeding Thatcher) had a certain level of social consciousness, and which didn't fuck me up when I broke my (once pretty strong) ties with it.

To answer the question: the Daily Mail *is* a C of E coffee morning while the Daily Telegraph is edited and defined by the most stern ideological stripe of High Tory Catholic. I hate the Telegraph less, out of the two, so Catholicism it is.

Robin Carmody, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I also find catholic priests a lot more sexy .

anthony, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

fuckin *yawn*

, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I see that this group is not very religious and that's ok for you, but I on the other hand was a confirmed Anglican in 1959. I was baptised in the High United Church when I was about 8 months old. Gale

Gale Deslongchamps, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Catholics have all sorts of impressive huge assed cathedrals round the world. Catholic church also isnt a democracy and is quite firm on that point, nothing but patriachy from them folks.

Mr Noodles, Tuesday, 20 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

However if it were to be constructed on who actually did most of the helping or parish work , the nuns would win. Catholicsm is very father in the front room mother in the kitchen . Anglicanism seems to be more eligatrain.

anthony, Wednesday, 21 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

now don't get me wrong, cos i'm not advocating christianity of any kind, but at least the anglicans let women be preists and stuff.

di, Wednesday, 21 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Suprising though it may seem I am a confirmed anglican, in a desperate search for somewhere to belong i decided to be confirmed into the church at school. very quickly afterwards I actually thought about things and regretted it but it did mean that I was baptised in the Henry VII chapel (font of princes and princesses, chapel of the knights of the garter etc.) in westminster abbey and then the following day recieve conformation in the abbey itself. I now mistrust all religion but still have a great belief in a higher power (God if you must), but think of it more as a collective conciousness or global soul.

this doesn't really answer the question. having some experience of schooldays anglican ritual (including singing psalms in latin and call and response latin prayers (public school don't you know). I can only say that anglicanism seems a very wet and weedy non commital form of christianity. However i am of the opion that christianintiy cloaks the essential message of Jesus the teacher i.e. 'why doesn't everyone be nice to each other?' Base Humanism or even humanity?

Ed, Wednesday, 21 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I did all of that without ansewering the question or even making a point really

Ed, Wednesday, 21 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But Ed, I thought it was the best post in the whole thread ...

Robin Carmody, Wednesday, 21 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

So if Anglicanism is the wimpy version of Christianity, and Christianity masks Jesus's teachings, being Anglican makes you more likely to see what Jesus meant because it doesn't interfere? Nice.

Maria, Wednesday, 21 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Catholoscism R calling crusade! Crusades R being very funny!

I R fatnick, Wednesday, 21 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

of course it helps that god is an englishman, maria

mark s, Wednesday, 21 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I was brought up a catholic but have a fondness for episcopalianism on account of its more laid back nature. I don't think "spinelessness" is a reasonable reason to dislike a religion, it's like saying "they're not a proper religion because they don't immolate non-believers".

Actually though, you probably really want to go the whole hog and join the Quakers or the Unitarians.

DV, Thursday, 22 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The Qaukers have a very structured religous system and service , quite rigid and the discpline carries out to miracles like Drs w/o Borders or the Friends Service Committee

anthony, Thursday, 22 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Both of my parents are Catholics, and I was raised as a Catholic (can't really say yer a Polack if yer not Catholic, but that's another issue and I digress). However, half of my Mom's family is Episcopalian, and based on the few times I've been to Episcopalian services it's always seemed like Catholicism without the Pope and pomp. Kinda appealing, in its way.

On the other hand, half of Dad's family is Eastern Orthodox, and that seems like Catholicism on steroids (longer services ofttimes conducted in Old Church Slavonic [the Latin of Slavic languages], even more pomp, ornate church art that borders on being over-the-top). And then there are the Uniate/Byzantine-rite/"Greek" Catholics, who retain Orthodox rituals but (unlike the Orthodox) acknowledge the Pope's authority. Us wacky Slavs ;-p

Tadeusz Suchodolski, Thursday, 22 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I still love the story of how the slavs became Orthodox. Pagan Vladimir I of Kiev decided he needed to modernize and become monotheistic and so sent out delegations to examine various options, ie Catholic and Orthodox Christianity, Judeaism and Islam. The visitors to Rome and the Jews where underwhelmed, and he soon decided any faith requiring circumcision and giving-up alcohol was never going to go down well with the Russian people. The Byzantium delegation, however, were lyrical over the church's art and beauty. Russia became Orthodox.

stevo, Thursday, 22 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

it helps that god is an englishman

A Yorkshireman to be precise.

RickyT, Thursday, 22 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"Spineless" not because of attitudes towards non-believers DV but because of its attitudes towards believers - the Anglicans I've met tend to fetishise their doubts and are happy to drop almost any element of their faith to be more accomodating - this is why they're being eroded by nastier and more vigorous protestant sects, I guess.

Tom, Thursday, 22 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Funny, why does God always have clipped, Oxbridge tones, then?

Whenever you meet a person with an English accent in the movies, he is always god or the devil, so beware. Just as any people with German accents are automatically Nazis. Poor Conrad Veidt.

kate, Thursday, 22 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

From Patley Bridge, I always thought.

Ed, Thursday, 22 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

why does God always have clipped, Oxbridge tones, then

Cos he studied at Cambridge, of course.

RickyT, Thursday, 22 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Messiah arrives on ILE in form of RickyT shocker.

Sam, Thursday, 22 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm a Latin American Catholic raised in the US. For me Catholicism is the only religion in the world whose rules for human behavior make sense when examined down to their most minute details. No contradictions if you bother to pick it apart. And no backing down on the tough points- that's the sign of a religion made in heaven: evil will always be called evil no matter how people "vote." To put it simply, the Catholic Church was founded by Jesus, Son of the Living God, and it gets going when the going gets tough. God's blessings on all of you!!

Luis, Thursday, 29 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

To this atheist, Anglicanism seems spineless but Catholicism seems mental.

I missed this thread before but I'd just like to say how neat a summary this is.

Luis - I agree that the Catholic Church's rules for human behaviour are more consistent than people give them credit for (even if they are WRONG). But the mentalism really kicks in when it comes to papal infallibility, n'est ce pas?

Nick, Thursday, 29 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

eleven months pass...
I am reviving this thread cause we are going religion mad.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 29 October 2002 10:00 (twenty-three years ago)

three years pass...
Can anyone recommend a good/neutral history of radical Catholicism (radical in the semi-heretical sense and/or radical in the Catholic Worker sense and other left-wing clergy) and how it interacts with the Church as a whole/reacts to reactionary elements in the Church?

milo z (mlp), Wednesday, 26 July 2006 00:44 (nineteen years ago)

ooh, I'd be interested in that, too. liberation theology and all that.

gbx (skowly), Wednesday, 26 July 2006 00:50 (nineteen years ago)

That's exactly what I want to read right now as well!

fields of salmon (fieldsofsalmon), Wednesday, 26 July 2006 02:04 (nineteen years ago)

Anglicanism vs. Catholicism =
http://www.freestyleorchidea.cz/images/hi_produkty/0314_bloody_mary.jpg
or, two wrongs make a bloody good drink ...

literalisp (literalisp), Wednesday, 26 July 2006 03:35 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.toplookalikes.co.uk/Crocodile-Dundee2.jpg

save me (Kiwi), Wednesday, 26 July 2006 04:45 (nineteen years ago)

“The energy of the human intellect ‘does from opposition grow‘, it thrives and is joyous, with a tough elastic strength, under the terrible blows of the divinely fashioned weapon, and it is never so much itself as when it has lately been overthrown. It is the custom of Protestant writers that…they have all the private judgement to themselves, and we have the full inheritance and super incumbent oppression of authority. But this is not so; it is the vast Catholic body itself, and it only, which affords an arena for both combatants in that awful never-dying duel. It is necessary for the very life of religion viewed in its large operations and history , that the warfare be incessantly carried on. Every exercise of infallibility is bought out into act by an intense and varied operation of reason, from within and without, and provokes again a reaction of reason against it; and, as in civil polity the state exists and endures by means of the rivalry and collision, the encroachments and defeats of its constituent parts, so in like manner Catholic Christendom is no simple exhibition of religious absolutism, but it presents a continuous picture of authority and private judgement alternately advancing and retreating as the ebb and flow of the tide;-it is a vast assemblage of human beings with wilful intellects and wild passions, bought together into one by the beauty and majesty of a superhuman power- into what may be called a reformatory or training school, not to be sent to bed, nor buried alive, but for the melting, refining and moulding, as in some moral factory, by an incessant noisy process of the raw material of human nature, so excellent, so dangerous, so capable of divine purposes.”

Newman (Kiwi), Wednesday, 26 July 2006 04:53 (nineteen years ago)

catholic priests make the best chickenhawks, duh!

timmy tannin (pompous), Wednesday, 26 July 2006 05:05 (nineteen years ago)

"anti-Narnia rantings"?

kingfish cyclopean ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 26 July 2006 05:07 (nineteen years ago)

"I can only say that anglicanism seems a very wet and weedy non-commital form of christianity"

I couldn't agree more. I'm pretty indifferent to religion in general, but I was raised Anglican, confirmed and even spent years in my church's server's guild. Non-commitment is the best part of the C of E. You basically do whatever you want all week, go to church for an hour on Sunday, tell God that you're sorry "for there is no health in us etc...", and you're good to go. Save all of the guilt for the Jews and Catholics.

J-rock (Julien Sandiford), Wednesday, 26 July 2006 05:29 (nineteen years ago)

Still Church of England. Do we worship God? No, we worship England.

The Committee To Keep Jazz Caged (kate), Wednesday, 26 July 2006 09:51 (nineteen years ago)

You don't even do that anymore!

Sploshette Moxy (Dada), Wednesday, 26 July 2006 09:56 (nineteen years ago)

Xpost:

There is a vast amount of literature on the Worker, and two I would reommend are: Revolution of the Heart, ed. Patrick Coy, a collection of scholarly essays, and A Penny a Copy: Readings From the Catholic Worker, eds. Thomas Cornell, Robert Ellsberg and Jim Forest, a collection of esays culled from the Catholic Worker newspaper.

In terms of a history of radical Catholicism, the only book I can think of is Breaking Bread: The Catholic Worker and the Origin of Catholic Radicalism in America, Mel Piehl.

Edb (edb), Thursday, 27 July 2006 11:55 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.