SciFi Channel to Air "Wizard of Earthsea" Miniseries

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.scifi.com/earthsea/

I have a bad feeling about this.

Nemo (JND), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:09 (twenty-one years ago)

It looks horrible.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I've deeply feared for some time. Phillipa Boyens of the LOTR bunch had expressed interest a while back in doing an adaptation, and I think she could have easily pulled it off. This...no.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Nick Sagan (Carl's son, I actually really like his novels) wrote an adaptation for a feature version that never got made, which also could have been good.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:15 (twenty-one years ago)

http://webpages.marshall.edu/~richar14/ogre.gif
NERRRRRRRRDS!!!!!

Does John Coltrane Dream of a Merry-go-round? (ex machina), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:19 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.geekroar.com/film/archives/nerds-poindext.jpg

Who got the last laugh, Ogre?

Nemo (JND), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Ogre became a Tri-Lam, remember?

Does John Coltrane Dream of a Merry-go-round? (ex machina), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't remember, actually, but I'm glad he had a change of heart.

But back to the thread subject:

"Tenar--Young priestess of THE TEMPLE OF ATUAN. Intelligent, beautiful and direct of speech and sentiment. An orphan accepted into the order, she absorbs like no other the lore of the AMULET OF PEACE, which broke in two and disappeared long ago — slowly, inevitably, dooming EARTHSEA. She is the girl in GED's visions."

What???

Nemo (JND), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:27 (twenty-one years ago)

i think it was in "nerds in paradise"

Does John Coltrane Dream of a Merry-go-round? (ex machina), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:33 (twenty-one years ago)

From her website
http://www.ursulakleguin.com/UKL_Info.html#News

"Miss Le Guin was not involved in the development of the material or the making of the film, but we've been very, very honest to the books," explains director Rob Lieberman. "We've tried to capture all the levels of spiritualism, emotional content and metaphorical messages. Throughout the whole piece, I saw it as having a great duality of spirituality versus paganism and wizardry, male and female duality. The final moments of the film culminate in the union of all that and represent two different belief systems in this world, and that's what Ursula intended to make a statement about. The only thing that saves this Earthsea universe is the union of those two beliefs."
Sci Fi Magazine
December 2004

I've tried very hard to keep from saying anything at all about this production, being well aware that movies must differ in many ways from the books they're based on, and feeling that I really had no business talking about it, since I was not included in planning it and was given no part in discussions or decisions.

That makes it particularly galling of the director to put words in my mouth.

Mr Lieberman has every right to say what his intentions were in making the film he directed, called "Earthsea." He has no right at all to state what I intended in writing the Earthsea books.

Had "Miss Le Guin" been honestly asked to be involved in the planning of the film, she might have discussed with the film-makers what the books are about.

When I tried to suggest the unwisdom of making radical changes to characters, events, and relationships which have been familiar to hundreds of thousands of readers all over the world for over thirty years, I was sent a copy of the script and informed that production was already under way.

So, for the record: there is no statement in the books, nor did I ever intend to make a statement, about "the union of two belief systems." There's nothing at all about the "duality of spirituality and paganism," whatever that means, either.

Earlier in the article, Robert Halmi is quoted as saying that Earthsea "has people who believe and people who do not believe." I can only admire Mr Halmi's imagination, but I wish he'd left mine alone.

In the books, the wizardry of the Archipelago and the ritualism of the Kargs are opposed and united, like the yang and yin. The rejoining of the broken arm-ring is a symbol of the restoration of an unresting, active balance, offering a risky chance of peace.

This has absolutely nothing to do with "people who believe and people who do not believe." That terrible division into Believers and Unbelievers (itself a matter not of reason but of belief) is one which bedevils Christianity and Islam and drives their wars.

But the wizards of Earthsea would look on such wars as madness, and the dragons of Earthsea would laugh at them and fly away...

Toto, something tells me Earthsea isn't Iraq.

I wonder if the people who made the film of The Lord of the Rings had ended it with Frodo putting on the Ring and ruling happily ever after, and then claimed that that was what Tolkien "intended..." would people think they'd been "very, very honest to the books"?

Ursula K. Le Guin
13 November 2004

***

This SO does not sound promising...

Layna Andersen (Layna Andersen), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I saw the site a couple of months ago and it had me almost frothing with rage. This is going to be the MOST appalling adaption EVER, if the website is anything to go by. Leaving aside the myriad infelicities of detail (who knew the majority of Earthsea's inhabitants were white!) the whole nonsense of 'spirituality vs paganism' represents such a fundamental misreading of the books that I cannot believe the director has actually READ them.

RickyT (RickyT), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:46 (twenty-one years ago)

The really infuriating thing about this is that a completely straight adaption of the first book would be relatively easy to do nowadays, and make excellent cinema. It is, after all, a great big coming of age tale, amongst other things.

RickyT (RickyT), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:58 (twenty-one years ago)

I saw an adverisement for this the other day (on the street-side of a payphone row on fifth avenue.) My reaction at the time was "Holy shit!" followed by laughter.

I don't have cable so I likely won't be able to see it.

Ian John50n (orion), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeouch, that last paragraph from LeGuin says it ALL.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)

IIRC they even get the definition of Dragonlord wrong on the site.

RickyT (RickyT), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)

I tried to find a picture of Kitiara to post here but the google img srch was surprisingly NSFW.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 19:02 (twenty-one years ago)

"surprisingly"

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 19:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Okay, so it's not surprising at all, when you think about it.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 19:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Did anyone see the Sci-Fi Channel's Riverworld adaptation? Dreadfull.

Wooden (Wooden), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Man, I used to dream back in the eighties of a way that all the series and books I read and loved would come to life somehow. Then the SciFi Channel fucked it all up. (I AM suddenly imagining with horror what their Lord of the Rings would have been like.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 19:27 (twenty-one years ago)

At least the Farscape mini was good (of course, if they didn't cancel it in the first place...).

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 19:28 (twenty-one years ago)

All things considered, it's amazing that the LOTR movies came out so well.

This looks so awful. Why don't they just go all the way and have everybody get around Earthsea on jet-skis?

Nemo (JND), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 20:17 (twenty-one years ago)

sci-fi's dune-children of dune mini was so fucking horrible, and yes, i watched the whole thing.

i agree with rickyt, the first earthsea book would make a really good movie, and you wouldn't need to "adapt" it at all. such a shame.

g--ff (gcannon), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 20:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, I knew I was forgetting, the FIRST Sci-Fi Dune mini was shockingly good.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 20:28 (twenty-one years ago)

really? maybe i only saw the 2nd half. susan sarandon as the deposed queen mum, and some slovak bint with collagen as alia, none of it made any sense. and the kid playing leto 2 was twice as awful! and i skipped a bunch of law & order to watch it all.

g--ff (gcannon), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 20:34 (twenty-one years ago)

No, that's their Children of Dune mini. The Dune mini (also multiple parts) had Saskia Reeves instead of Susan Sarandon and was much tighter & better acted.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 20:36 (twenty-one years ago)

ah ok. as i recall the book kinda sucked to begin with.

g--ff (gcannon), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 20:39 (twenty-one years ago)

The children of dune mini was horribly compelling viewing.

the insult-to-injury aspect of the earthsea mini is Kristin Kreuk as Tenar and Shawn Ashmore as Ged and I kill myself now.

cis (cis), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, a PROPER Earthsea film or miniseries wouldn't be rocket science to make, not at all. It could've been lovely. These were my FAVORITE books as a young teen, and still hold up now that I'm (supposedly) an adult.

Layna Andersen (Layna Andersen), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 07:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh god. Thank the baby Jesus that I don't get the Sci-Fi Channel. It's at times like this that I wish all my favourite authors could be sealed away magically so stupid people would never even notice their books. It would work kind of like a kill-file.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 11:07 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.