― detoxyDancer (sexyDancer), Sunday, 8 January 2006 16:56 (twenty years ago)
― Ed (dali), Sunday, 8 January 2006 16:59 (twenty years ago)
― detoxyDancer (sexyDancer), Sunday, 8 January 2006 17:02 (twenty years ago)
― brg30 (brg30), Sunday, 8 January 2006 17:11 (twenty years ago)
― ESTEBAN BUTTEZ~!!! (ESTEBAN BUTTEZ~!!!), Sunday, 8 January 2006 17:13 (twenty years ago)
― Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Sunday, 8 January 2006 17:15 (twenty years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Sunday, 8 January 2006 17:16 (twenty years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Sunday, 8 January 2006 17:17 (twenty years ago)
― Aimless (Aimless), Sunday, 8 January 2006 18:46 (twenty years ago)
― AMERICA...FUCK YEAH, Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:32 (twenty years ago)
― thousands of tiny luminous spheres (plebian), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:43 (twenty years ago)
this is the dumbest fucking thing i've read this week, terrible jurisprudence and a gross abuse of data analytics
https://blog.harvardlawreview.org/corpus-linguistics-and-the-second-amendment/
― Arch Bacon (rushomancy), Thursday, 9 August 2018 13:24 (seven years ago)
Stuff like that should really be subject to the Daubert standards for expert testimony just like any other "scientific" evidence. Sounds like complete hokum.
― Fedora Dostoyevsky (man alive), Thursday, 9 August 2018 15:50 (seven years ago)