did you see it? heard it was great
― cozen (Cozen), Monday, 20 March 2006 21:26 (twenty years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Monday, 20 March 2006 21:28 (twenty years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Monday, 20 March 2006 22:15 (twenty years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Monday, 20 March 2006 22:16 (twenty years ago)
However the Jake Chapman docu in the same series was SUPERB - tremendous footage of a Herman Nitsch ritual and another piss-shitting Aktionist whose name I missed, plus I finally got to see Chris Burden getting shot in the arm (he reacts like he's been stung by a bee!)
― Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Monday, 20 March 2006 22:51 (twenty years ago)
= ZIZEK IN A NUTSHELL
― Yawn (Wintermute), Monday, 20 March 2006 22:53 (twenty years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Monday, 20 March 2006 23:40 (twenty years ago)
the missus is reading his book on (loose use of 'on' there) kieslowski, and she says that he's very good, but why oh why does he keep returning to lacan.
mad props to man like ward fowler for bringing up durgnat: it's always struck me as odd that that RD's 'WR - mysteries' book (which btw is the best book ever) has a cover quote from zizek, cos durgnat wasn't exactly a lacanian. but otoh they do have a lot in common, and sail over most academic film theory.
― Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 09:35 (twenty years ago)
That'll be Gunther Brus then, Nitsch handled the blood and guts end of things, he had the piss and shit franchise
― Dadaismus the Blind (of Alexandria) (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 11:27 (twenty years ago)
― Dadaismus the Blind (of Alexandria) (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 11:29 (twenty years ago)
: ?
― cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 21:49 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 23:02 (twenty years ago)
we look forward to the pervert's guide to english grammar ;-)
― Queen Gramscieanheandthemtooifyouwanit, Thursday, 23 March 2006 03:45 (twenty years ago)
― Jena (JenaP), Thursday, 23 March 2006 04:53 (twenty years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 19:56 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 20:10 (twenty years ago)
― Lobomir (Lobo), Monday, 3 July 2006 23:21 (nineteen years ago)
― electric sound of jim [and why not] (electricsound), Monday, 3 July 2006 23:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 00:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 00:12 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to start Raaatpackin (chap), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 01:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 07:27 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 17:51 (nineteen years ago)
why oh why does he keep returning to lacan.
Uh, dude, cause he's from the Lacan school. Duh! That said, didn't the Lacan school/Miller (son in law?) sort of throw him out? Or didn't Miller refuse to publish his writings? Anyhow, he's great though. I love him because for years I didn't understand (nor want to understand) Lacan. Now, via Zizek, I'm getting into Lacan (and Freud) again.
- I was chiefly struck by how OLD most of zizek's film examples were (apart from YAWN the Matrix, i can't think of a film that's LESS in need of explanation
I'm only in the first half of Looking Awry and already stumbled upon some *newish* films. Well, Desperately Seeking Susan. That's actually old but not so old, right?
Whatever. I like his writings.
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 19:38 (nineteen years ago)
i still haven't bothered to watch it.
nathalie, i don't think him being from the lacan school lets him off the hook here, quite the opposite! why is he a lacanian?
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 08:18 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 10:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 10:41 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 10:45 (nineteen years ago)
― teh_kit has 22 friends (g-kit), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 10:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 11:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Lobomir (Lobo), Thursday, 6 July 2006 21:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Friday, 7 July 2006 08:24 (nineteen years ago)
He's a contrarian. Oh god, that only makes sense if you know his biography.
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Friday, 7 July 2006 17:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Monday, 24 July 2006 07:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Bashment Jakes (Enrique), Monday, 21 August 2006 13:23 (nineteen years ago)