FREEMASONRY: To Know, To Will, Dare... but, to Keep Silent? Nah, here's some shit for you to chew on. (Besides the fact that your uncle goes to Lodge to drink beer)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
From an, I guess, SUPER-SECRET Masonic group. Nobody ever told me to shut up, so here's something interesting for you to read (a series of anonymous letters from one Mason to another):

Enjoy!
Frater B.V.
----------------


Greetings,

Free Masons worship the devil. (haha! wait and see how this turns out!) This is a very well known fact. (among shmucks!) A casual reading of the bible will show you that the creator of this world was the devil after he was cast out of heaven.

Thelemites (Rabelais, Crowley) on the other hand are Johnnanite Christians who worship the true Christ(The God-Self)...that Lion in Chapter Five of the Revelations that is worthy to open The Book. Thelemites are those gnostics who have restored the place of the feminine in divinity over 100 years ago.

The fact the the Blue Lodge (Californian Masonic Lodge) is so short sighted about the key to its own mystery is the crime. Real Free Masons who are instructed by the spirit of Wison as Solomom of old was understand the mysteries of tolerance, harmony and charity. Neo Con slobs with the gall to sully the apron with their narrow minded attempts to violate the fundamental principles of the Lodge will pay the price with smoking entrails and blotting of their name from all record. What is this fundamental principle...we do not discuss religion or politics in the lodge and we are instructed to practice those duties outside the lodge that were inculcated within it.

Any California Mason who raises his voice against another brothers
religion is in the gravest violation of his obligations.

To worship god under any form is not a masonic offense, but to cast
apsersions on a brothers religion is to harm his good name, and that
is a violation that will in time cause the infliction of the
pentalities which imprecations fell from your his mouth. Not to be
exacted by the living Masons but upon you by the brothers who labor
ceasely on that temple eternal in the heavens and not made my the
hands of men. Out side the gates of that great city you will be lost
to memory, with in sight of that glorious temple you will be split and
your entrails removed and cast on a fie that is so hot it vaporizes
all traces that you ever were...all for thinking that you knew better
than 500 years of fraternity that demands we do not judge a brothers
religion under any circumstances.

Any Freemasons really want to argue the finer points of a religion in order to shit on it?

------------


On the barest of metaphysical grounds it is obvious that the Masons
worship the Demiurge. Not that there is anything wrong with that.

On the barest of Metaphysical grounds the True Hightest is far
beyond having an initial for his name.

The god of the name is not the highest god...on purely resonable
grounds.

No Joke...masons realized they can't throw stones...thus the
tolerance bit.


--------------

In many early christian teachings it is the god of this world who
usurped the authority of the highest...when we slip beyond the
bounds of ego we can restore the demiurge.

The reason for Lodge is a place where we practice the harmony and
tolerance that the ego devien world has lost...how can you argue
with that?


--------------


Freemasonry is a violation of several basic covenents with the Abrahamic God...the most basic is that we would not carve stone.

Solomon worshipped the Goddess and patterned his temple after those
of Astarte in Tyre. This is common knowledge.

What is the defense against such a historically founded charge?

Free Masonry is as dirty or more dirty than Thelema...Thelemites
never killed any American Indians to steal their land...Masons did.

If we do away with blanket tolerance then where do we start to draw
the line?

Masons are the biggest promoters of Human Sacrifice since the
Aztecs...also Temple Builders...

Hiram,Jeptha's Daughther, Adoniram,42000 fellow hebrew
tribesmen...and I am sure I could go on if I tried. It is a mystery
drenched in blood...no less bloody than Thelema.

Animal Sacrifice...they praise the slaying of 100 bulls for the
42nd proposition, they burn up a lamp on the alter in a higher
degree, each masons wears a dead lamp on their lap when they are
raised to the sublime degree of master mason.

Blood and Death...unclear realtionship with Metaphysical
Deity...all add up to a pretty unsavoy mixture.

No wonder memebership is down...and the only ones left were the ones
that had to control the lodge in spite of what they learned.


--------------

Q: what is a demiurge?

--------------

In some Gnostic traditions, YHVH is God of creation that could see no
God but himself, so he came to think of himself as the only God. He is
responsible for creating matter, which is associated with Saturn and
Satan, Maya and the Devil, interestingly enough.

However, without Reality, ideas are abstractions of no consequence.
The Soul, to be Real, is "chained to matter." This is why certain
things are "bound to happen" (as the people are bound to the throne of
the Devil in Key 15) and why some ideas just "don't matter" (they are
"immaterial.") in the long run.

In my humble opinion, it is best to take all creation myths NOT at
face value and NOT with a grain of salt, but to analyze them and
scrutinize them intensely. It was only yesterday that I discovered
that Sulphur, associated with the stench of hell and the Devil, is
also the color of the Sun. If I remember correctly, it also burns
leaving "white earth" (ash) or "purified earth" rather than "black
earth". The symbolism here represents a paradox: the flame of dynamism
(life power) that is controlled by the will ...OR... the flame of
passions that overwhelm the will and turn into "possession." In this
sense, the twin flame is a representation of both Satan and Christ.

There is a history of solar gods being nailed or chained to
matter, as Jesus was nailed to the cross. Nail = Vav (6). Vav is
represented by the Man in Yod-Heh-Vav-Heh (Lion-Eagle-Man-Bull) and
Yod, the Flame, represented by the Lion. What else has been associated
with the Lion? Fire and the Serpent. Yod is the primary shape from
which all the other Hebrew letter forms were made. This is why it is
sometimes refered to as the "flame alphabet."

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 01:15 (twenty years ago)

Last bit with the Question and answer is probably the most interesting. The guy/s above were basically drunk, I think, and arguing. But, they produced a question which produced an interesting answer. Funny that they are arguing about religion, which they're not SUPPOSED to be doing!!

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 01:23 (twenty years ago)

btw, parenthetical notations in first post are mine, such as "(haha! wait and see how this turns out!)" ... the guy was being sarcastic, though, so he was self-aware.

1972 - 1983, he was put to sleep when he got too old with heart worms and the mange. (that meant nothing; I just wanted you to read something I was listening to)

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 01:26 (twenty years ago)

I, for one, welcome our new fucking stupid googling conspiracy cunt masters.

Every Time I Open Up My Mouth All Bullets Spit Out: Bang! (noodle vague), Friday, 28 April 2006 01:52 (twenty years ago)

eat a bag of shit

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 01:53 (twenty years ago)

I would, as I never could pass on a bag of shit, but I'm "chained to matter" which I suppose was "bound to happen."

/me aaaaaaaaaa (eman), Friday, 28 April 2006 01:57 (twenty years ago)

good 1

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 01:59 (twenty years ago)

"new"? "googling"? nope.

electric sound of jim (and why not) (electricsound), Friday, 28 April 2006 02:04 (twenty years ago)

I vote we make Madame Blavatsky moderator of ILE.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 28 April 2006 02:26 (twenty years ago)

I vote we make Madame Blavatsky moderator of ILE.

she was Jack The Ripper, according to Aleister Crowley. Not exactly a trustworthy moderator!

References: http://www.redflame93.com/FriendsAcquaintances.html (pro-crowley)

http://bookoflaw276.tripod.com/crowleyripper.html (also pro-Crowley, but after a different fashion)

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 02:29 (twenty years ago)

oh...


....(on the redflam93.com link click "Jack The Ripper"... don't be lookin' for "Blavatsky" ... taint there. Taint. My taint.) so, when you get to here http://www.redflame93.com/FriendsAcquaintances.html click Jack the Ripper and get to here http://www.redflame93.com/JacktheRipper.html

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 02:36 (twenty years ago)

the Comte de St. Germain used to post to this board, maybe he'll have some answers for you.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 28 April 2006 03:10 (twenty years ago)

maybe you'll eat a bag of shit

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 03:14 (twenty years ago)

have you read Foucault's Pendulum?

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 28 April 2006 04:12 (twenty years ago)

Mr. Knight, get off ILX please? K, thanx, bye.

Wear High Heels, Get A Record Deal (kate), Friday, 28 April 2006 08:16 (twenty years ago)

she was Jack The Ripper, according to Aleister Crowley.

I love the idea of anyone taking Crowley seriously as a detective.

Oh no, I am having an irresistable current of will released against me!

DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 28 April 2006 08:41 (twenty years ago)

Obviously, someone never read Simon Iff. Or the article in question where AC is incriminating himself more than HPB. Irresistable current of will is not an accurate description at all since you are referring to lack of will.

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 08:56 (twenty years ago)

have you read Foucault's Pendulum?

Sublimatio!

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 08:58 (twenty years ago)

Irresistable current of will is not an accurate description at all since you are referring to lack of will.

Dude, you know nothing, I am talking about Mathers.

MODERATORS - lock this thread when the reply count reaches 23.

DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 28 April 2006 09:46 (twenty years ago)

Was that first sentence really supposed to 2 sentences, or were you calling me a "know-nothing?"

Now, what are you trying to say about Mathers? An "irresistable current of will" is an oxymoron because an "irresistable current" is not "will" at all, which was my point.

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 09:52 (twenty years ago)

This is new:
http://www.dcmetronet.com/landseaandairlodge1iraq/

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 10:56 (twenty years ago)

wow, who could possibly give one half of a shit?

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 28 April 2006 11:11 (twenty years ago)

An "irresistable current of will" is an oxymoron because an "irresistable current" is not "will" at all, which was my point.

This sentence makes me laugh :-)

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Friday, 28 April 2006 11:17 (twenty years ago)

Was that first sentence really supposed to 2 sentences, or were you calling me a "know-nothing?"

Bag of shit ready here, any time you're hungry.

/me aaaaaaaaaa (eman), Friday, 28 April 2006 12:14 (twenty years ago)

Note title of thread. You are already eating the feces.

xpost: wow, who could possibly give one half of a shit?

This is the sentence that makes me laugh :-) I literally laughed out loud.

Point of this here shit-eating thread is "Masons do more than drink beer." They are based on the idea of helping and bettering humanity and this comes from the Ancient Wisdom found in Mystery Traditions, which they are obviously based on.

They actually are supposedly non-religious and only require a belief in a higher power because the Ancient Wisdom is One great stream with many tributaries. Your religion is SUPPOSED TO BE your own business. AND YET, the Grand Lodge in California has banned Thelema. You can't put the Book on the altar. I wonder how they would feel about the Satanic Bible. :-\

So, anyway, next time you open your big fat yap to talk about Masonry, shut up.

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 12:27 (twenty years ago)

This is an awesome thread!

JW (ex machina), Friday, 28 April 2006 12:38 (twenty years ago)

22.

That is all.

Rufus 3000 (Mr Noodles), Friday, 28 April 2006 12:55 (twenty years ago)

I read somewhere recently that the flourishing of Freemasonry in the 18th and 19th centuries was an attempt to perpetuate the secret knowledge which had been passed down through the medieval guilds, once the rise of capitalism and industrialism had brought about their decline.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 28 April 2006 13:02 (twenty years ago)

o. nate, it is interesting (to me) that Thelema, or a purely Thelemic society, necessarily requires both an end to democracy and to capitalism. Most people think these are the two greatest ideas ever. Thelema replaces all old political and economic systems with one law: Do what thou wilt; Love is the law, love under will. Essentially, this is a utopian anarchy based upon a spiritual understanding of cosmic unity. Funny that any Mason would ban such a religion.

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 13:08 (twenty years ago)

Seahorses, Nephilm.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 28 April 2006 13:10 (twenty years ago)

HEY I EAT MEAT
HOW'S BUSINESS, CRAZYPANTS?!??

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Friday, 28 April 2006 13:12 (twenty years ago)

Crowley's symbol was the Sea Goat.

TOMBOT: Pretty good!

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 13:14 (twenty years ago)

The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. These were the mighty men who were of old, the men of renown.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 28 April 2006 13:15 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, and God is a man with a beard that lives on a cloud.

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 13:16 (twenty years ago)

funny that any Mason would ban such a religion.

if by "funny" you mean "uninteresting," yes

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 28 April 2006 13:16 (twenty years ago)

All Great plains of the Earth are now lighted by fire. Now gather under wrecked land from these horsemen in iron.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 28 April 2006 13:17 (twenty years ago)

Do what thou wilt; Love is the law, love under will

That might be fine as a personal credo, but I don't think it would ever fly as the organizing principle of society. Because pretty soon someone would do what they wilt to someone else and the other person wouldn't like it, so they'd do what they wilt back even worse - and before you know it there would be wars, murder, crime, gnashing of teeth and the whole sorry mess all over again. Law is set up for the purpose of resolving these kinds of conflicts - pretending that these conflicts wouldn't exist isn't a solution, it's a pipe dream.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 28 April 2006 13:18 (twenty years ago)

xpost:
Calcinatio!

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 13:19 (twenty years ago)

if by "funny" you mean "uninteresting," yes

in that case, you're a funny guy

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 13:19 (twenty years ago)

Because pretty soon someone would do what they wilt to someone else and the other person wouldn't like it, so they'd do what they wilt back even worse

Your criticism is based on a face-value interpretation of the law, but you are not wrong. In actuality, no Will is supposed to be opposed to another, but to get this to fly as the organizing principle of society would require society to be educated in Crowley's mystical and magical system of the A.'.A.'. and that is not likely to happen ever. For Thelemites, it doesn't much matter, though, since "the few and unknown shall rule the many and the known."

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 13:25 (twenty years ago)

touche, Fratre Blue! please continue enlightening us all on the intricacies of this totally inconsequential belief system.

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 28 April 2006 13:34 (twenty years ago)

Join in the chorus, prosper the art.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 28 April 2006 13:37 (twenty years ago)

How could the few rule the many if no will can be opposed to another? Doesn't the concept of "rule" imply one will being subordinated to another?

xpost

o. nate (onate), Friday, 28 April 2006 13:38 (twenty years ago)

And when we have said adieu,
May our love remain with you,
And may we renew that love,
In a Grander Lodge Above.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 28 April 2006 13:38 (twenty years ago)

Karl McCoy needs to record some Freemasonry songs.

Third Degree

Days and moments quickly flying,
Blend the living with the dead;
Soon will you and I be lying
Each within his narrow bed.

Soon our souls to God Who gave them
Will have sped their rapid flight;
Able now by grace to save them,
Oh! that while we can we might.

As the tree falls, so must it lie;
As the man lives, so must he die;
As the man dies, so must he be
All through the days of eternity.

So mote it be.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 28 April 2006 13:40 (twenty years ago)

How could the few rule the many if no will can be opposed to another? Doesn't the concept of "rule" imply one will being subordinated to another?

Finding your True Will is the One Will, so the term "rule" is a loose term. What it means is anyone who follows his True Will can not fail and anyone who opposes, if even possible, will fail.

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 13:44 (twenty years ago)

I don't understand.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 28 April 2006 13:45 (twenty years ago)

EVERY MAN AND WOMAN IS A STAR!!

http://www.ftd.com/pics/products/X657_b.jpg

elmo argonaut (allocryptic), Friday, 28 April 2006 13:53 (twenty years ago)

Onimo, like in the Bible, when Jesus supposedly said, "not my will but Thine." The basic idea behind the Mystery Traditions is that there is One substance in the universe that realizes itself in the substance of form. The best way I can explain it is the idea of the "fall from heaven" from a psychological perspective. As an idea becomes focused, it congeals from abstract formlessness to "earth." The Soul is "chained to matter" as said above. Time and space are qualities of "earth." From a loftier perspective, you may be able to see more, but you are further removed and it is less "real"... especially without a corporeal body to sense, feel and relate to.

Just watching the news is somewhat of an example: though it is not exactly a "view from above," it does exist more in the mental plane for the viewer in many cases moreso than physical reality. The news is real life, but unless it's the local news and you actually care what goes on in your town, it is easy to ignore and sometimes even difficult to relate to, even if it is "real." Hearing of a war in Iraq might affect us mentally, but in many cases, we can ignore the reality of it. BEING in the war in Iraq is a completely different reality.

Speaking of examples, analogies themselves are examples. Until abstract ideas are related to in TERMS WE CAN UNDERSTAND, they remain abstract. Analogies are real-life situations we can relate to which have a similarity to the concept being expressed. These real-life situations are grounded in earth; it is a way to bring the abstract "down to earth," as they say.

Formation was the work of the One Will to experience fully. From earth, we can't see the "big picture" as easily, but we are intimately involved in it: "God made man IN his image." What Crowley's system does is connect the human personality, which is a reflection of the Soul, to it's higher intelligence. Plato called this his daemon, Crowley called it the Holy Guardian Angel. Once this occurs, the True Will is understood. As the personality is a reflection of the Soul, the Soul is a reflection of the One and, thus, the True Will is the Will of the One. But, the personality is split into compartmentalized consciousness which allows free will. The self-consciousness communicates to the subconscious, the subconscious communicates to the super-conscious and the super-conscious communicates to the subconscious which then relays the message to the self-conscious. Man has no way of discovering his True Will without sincere effort. It is totally hidden from him until he unites with super-conscious. And by then, he is a completely different person.

Aren't you glad you asked?

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 14:01 (twenty years ago)

I understand!

Good Omeno (GerryNemo), Friday, 28 April 2006 14:05 (twenty years ago)

http://www.mabuse.de/images/mabuse_portrait.gif

784, Friday, 28 April 2006 14:53 (twenty years ago)

Seriously though, do you really think most freemasons think of the organisation as any more then a secular pre-frienster/myspace social networking organisation? Even with all the "ritual"?

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 28 April 2006 15:48 (twenty years ago)

DOES A FREE MASON MOSH TO KILLING JOKE?

Washable School Paste (sexyDancer), Friday, 28 April 2006 15:51 (twenty years ago)

The answer to all 3 questions is: YES!

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 15:54 (twenty years ago)

Well all the freemasons I've met would disagree with you. Of course they may not have been telling me the whole truth, for fear of their tounges being cut out!

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 28 April 2006 15:57 (twenty years ago)

naw, freemasonry is one of those deals where once a person starts REALLY REALLY THINKIN' ABOUT IT A LOT they start to imagine all kindsa koo-koo stuff

beats watchin' tv though!

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 28 April 2006 16:05 (twenty years ago)

Well all the freemasons I've met would disagree with you. Of course they may not have been telling me the whole truth, for fear of their tounges being cut out!

Or to avoid getting into specifics. They can get their geek on in private, like I do, at Lodge or semi-anonymously online using member number and signing in as "Frater Whassisbutt." Then, of course, there are the Masons who never ask or learn from other masons, don't want to read, etc. From what I gather, there are a lot of masons like this, which makes me wonder what they get out of it. Pay dues to do charity work and get drunk, I guess? The lodges in my hometown where people got loaded were mostly K of C's or other groups that just rented space in the Masonic temple. But, the rituals themselves are designed to work on the subconscious, so perhaps even the unwitting Masons are made "better men." Drunk men, but better!

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 16:10 (twenty years ago)

drunk men are always better!

dan kind of otm, though i'm sure there are plenty of masons who get more out of it than social networking (though that is the main draw) and make use of the libraries, etc. however they assuredly do NOT do this by reading aleister crowley.

bell labs (bell_labs), Friday, 28 April 2006 16:18 (twenty years ago)

Please note: the first post is Masons arguing with other Masons about the fact that they worship the Devil. Do you think this is the sort of discussion any Mason would want to get into with a NON-MASON?! Keep in mind, in the above discussion, it is a Thelemite pointint out the hypocrisy of the Californian Lodge as judging/condemning HIS religion when, clearly, Masonry is "Devil worship." He is pointing out that these Masons have forgotten the most important rule: do not judge another's religion.

Think about that for a moment and it should start to sink in why "no masons i know are religious." Imagine the follow up questions: "Oh, so Masons ARE religious? What do Masons believe?" Much easier to just keep silence.

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 16:21 (twenty years ago)

Wired: The Fence Club
Tired: Skull & Bones
Expired: Freemasons

LOL Thomas (Chris Barrus), Friday, 28 April 2006 16:25 (twenty years ago)

social networking is an occult secret, no? i'm not entirely joking, inasmuch as the "occult" power that the lowly and suspicious attribute to secret societies & other fraternal organizations is, underneath, just a folk mythos built on the influence of rich and connected elite. i find it kind of funny how you bring up that anarchic political interpretation of "do what thou wilt", when the realm of secret societies is (at least popularly) considered to be that of wealth and privilege. haven't the powerful always done what they will anyway? that is: is the esoteric teaching at the core of secret societies just a spiritual palliative for those who hold dominion?

elmo argonaut (allocryptic), Friday, 28 April 2006 16:56 (twenty years ago)

elmo,
Divine right of kings and all that, I suppose?

You missed the spiritual utopian aspect of the "anarchist" purely Thelemic fantasy society. Masonry has banned Thelema and thus banned "Do what thou wilt" as a concept. Perhaps due to its deeper "The Law Is For All" meaning rather than what it appears to be on the surface, as you seem to be interpreting it? I'm not sure, exactly, why a Masonic Lodge would ban Thelema because the perspective you're coming from is different from the perspective Masonry officially endorses. "Do what thou wilt" is not the free-for-all "whatever you want" philosophy that the rich do whatever they feel like because they have the money and power to do it. As explained previously, it is a philosophy that is fairly opposed to whims of the personal ego. And, as such, it SHOULD be in line with the official views of Masonry "to help" and to "make better men."

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 17:11 (twenty years ago)

For all you Wiki enthusiasts: http://www.thelemapedia.org/

Wiki Tiki Tavi, Friday, 28 April 2006 17:32 (twenty years ago)

Christ, that link is NSFW

Washable School Paste (sexyDancer), Friday, 28 April 2006 17:58 (twenty years ago)

Why isn't it safe for work? There's no nudity or anything on the page I linked. Maybe if you dig deeper in the site there's sex stuff? I haven't seen anything that would get a person fired there yet.

Fratré Blue Veiner, Friday, 28 April 2006 18:29 (twenty years ago)

NSFW if you work at the Vatican, maybe

elmo argonaut (allocryptic), Friday, 28 April 2006 18:33 (twenty years ago)

On reflection, I think I prefer A Nairn to this guy Farté.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 28 April 2006 23:42 (twenty years ago)

What?! I thought when you wrote "I understand!" you were my new bff. Fickle fake friend, you are!

Fratré Blue Veiner, Saturday, 29 April 2006 01:53 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.