Getting A Tan -- C/D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
is there such a 'thing' about this with white folk in other countries?

i like sitting in the sun as much as the next bespectacled, formerly indie shut-in, but srsly, who has the time?

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:26 (nineteen years ago)

German sun-lounger occupation stereotype to thread

Konal Doddz (blueski), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:28 (nineteen years ago)

hey, thanks for reminding me, I was going to start a similar thread... for countries outside of the US, how big of an industry/market is sunscreen? (vs long sleeves and hats -vs- staying indoors when it's really sunny.)

DAVE's secret to fortu-Oh look! Shiny! (dave225.3), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:31 (nineteen years ago)

i have a panama hat, just not quite ready to wear it in london.

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:32 (nineteen years ago)

I have very dark-for-a-white-person arms, face and lower legs, because I work outdoors. The rest of me is fishbelly. When I go to the beach and see white people with the all-over tans, my inner Calvinist is offended. Too much leisure time and too much vanity. It's all envy, of course.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:34 (nineteen years ago)

i am under the perhaps srsly deluded impression that getting a tan is protection, of a sort, so i don't have to do things like wear panama hats

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:35 (nineteen years ago)

I love England compared to the US because there is so much GREATER an awareness of sunscreen (i.e. not wanting to tan or burn or otherwise lobster out in an English fashion) and the like. I mean, the highest I remember being able to get in the US was sun factor 20 or something. Sun Factor 25 is normal here, and you can get up to 50, 60, 100 no problems.

OK, I know it's probably dangerous to use super high SPF stuff for long periods of time. But, having English skin acclimatised to English weather, anything more than 20 minutes tops in the sun and I lobster out. (As seen the weekend of Liz's memorial service.)

But then again, I've never been into sitting in the sun for the purposes of getting a tan. Occasionally I let some sun fall on my skin for Vitamin D purposes, but otherwise, it happens only by accident.

Kaet (kate), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:35 (nineteen years ago)

arranging oneself in the sun for set amounts of time purely for the purpose of getting a tan, turning oneself over like a piece of bacon to ensure all-over even crispiness = dud

messing around outdoors for kicks, walking/swimming/cycling/drinking/picknicking/frisbeeing/surfing/kayaking/whatever, and getting a tan as a result and suddenly catching sight of the contrast between your lilywhite soft bits and your goldenbrown exposed parts = classic

skin cancer dud though. wear suncream people! you can wear suncream and still get a tan!

emsk ( emsk), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:36 (nineteen years ago)

I am fish belly white and burn easily. The year I got married I managed to sunburn my knees only in July - and they were still peeling on my wedding day. In October.

Maybe I am jealous of people who can tan, but having seen what UV light does to cells in a petri dish after even short exposure, I use the sunblock, stay white as a ghost, and try to like it.

Sara R-C (Sara R-C), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:38 (nineteen years ago)

Tan = protection depends on your skin type. If you are Type 3 or above, yes, tanning your naturally melotonin-rich skin will be protection.

Most white people in the UK, however, are either type 1 or 2. The former doesn't tan at all, ever, the latter tans with difficulty and the sun exposure required to get tanned is still risk of skin cancer tanning.

Kaet (kate), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:38 (nineteen years ago)

how do you know what type you are, just by looking at what happens to you in the sun?

emsk ( emsk), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:41 (nineteen years ago)

dud, because i burn horribly with one exception. after a month of weekends at the pool/beach, i'm still morticia pale (where i'm not red) save for really brown feet. how does that happen? it looks extremely bizarre.

multiple xposts - i've never had a problem getting high-factor sunscreen in the us.

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:42 (nineteen years ago)

the highest I remember being able to get in the US was sun factor 20 or something.

what? no. that must have been a long time ago. actually, australia only had up to 15 SPF until a few years ago.

for me tans are DUD DUD DUD. i dont get the whole 'oh you look healthier with a tan!' no. you look like your going to get cancer with a tan.

and besides that i dont know why people cant be happy with the color they are. its stupid.

oh, and please dont say 'suncream' anymore. it makes me think of drunken english boys in ibiza. gross.

sunny successor (katharine), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:43 (nineteen years ago)

I don't tan and I don't try, but lying around in the shade reading a book/getting drunk/watching the world go by is classic to the max.

Annie Get Your Gin (noodle vague), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:45 (nineteen years ago)

A Black and Tan?

Rev. PappaWheelie (PappaWheelie 2), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:45 (nineteen years ago)

OK, I haven't actually tried to buy high SPF sunscreen in the US since the late 80s, but still.

I read the Skin Type Thing somewhere... possibly while waiting in the doctors office or something. I should look it up. I seem to recall I was type 2 but can't remember what the criteria were.

Kaet (kate), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:46 (nineteen years ago)

i like having a tan, if i get one. i think maybe it's less of a fetish-object in the UK than it was in the '80s. or is that total bollocks? there's a girl at work who's come back from holiday head-to-toe brown, which is kind of impressive; otoh i like to DO stuff on holiday. the tan seems to have been the main activity.

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:47 (nineteen years ago)

i can't sunbathe. don't have the patience. not that i'd tan anyway i don't think. i don't really like my 'pastiness' but what are you going to do?

Konal Doddz (blueski), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:49 (nineteen years ago)

Type I
"Always burns; never tans."
("Your skin only reddens and freckles. If you are trying to get a tan by merging your freckles, please stop. You aren't fooling anyone." Damn... OK, that won't work.)
Type II
"Burns easily; tans minimally."
Type III
"Burns moderately; tans gradually to light brown."
Type IV
"Burns minimally; always tans well to moderately brown."
Type V
"Rarely burns; tans profusely to dark brown."
Type VI
"Never burns; deeply pigmented; insensitive."

Kaet (kate), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:50 (nineteen years ago)

Type III here: why always so average? : (

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:51 (nineteen years ago)

in this kind of weather, the only way to win is do absolutely nothing. i was in porto last weekend and the pool was my best friend. it is hard to read while sweating down one's face, i'll give you that.

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:51 (nineteen years ago)

OTM: damn this 'going to work' bullshit.

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:53 (nineteen years ago)

barthes to thread.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:56 (nineteen years ago)

Wow. I'm widely considered to be hopelessly palefaced in the States, but apparently I'm a low type III? I'm shocked.

At my sister's wedding one of the other bridesmaids said she hadn't had time to get a tan but at least she could count on ME to be the palest face in the room. Nice, eh? After two beach weekends in a row I look much more like a healthy, sporty human being, but then I come from a summer town where everyone's brown as a nut and *I'm* the crazy one -- in NYC I don't stand out NEARLY as much. I don't "tan" tan (and certainly not INDOORS in a TANNING BED), but laying at the beach/pool with a book and a drink is one of life's perfect moments, as far as I'm concerned, and you do gather some sun that way.

And you can get SPF 36/45/etc at any normal drugstore! I use Bullfrog gel, the heavy-duty waterproof stuff. I think it's good for at least 80 minutes of water/sweat? Very necessary.

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:01 (nineteen years ago)

so i think i am iv then.

emsk ( emsk), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:05 (nineteen years ago)

People with type anything can still get skin cancer; the darker your skin is naturally the less likely you are to get it because you don't burn, which fucks the cells faster, and they're also hella less likely to try to get tan, but it's not like they're immune. Those types of articles are dangerous IMO; they are helping a lot of Type IIIs and IVs into joining the cancer epidemic. I'm a Type II, btw. I'm also vaguely suspicious that I've already got skin cancer and this thread is reminding me to stop being a douchebag and go to the doctor.

I've had two dermotologists tell me they hate sunscreens that are over SPF 15 because they've convinced a generation of intelligent young people trying to avoid skin cancer that they don't have to reapply their sunscreen just as often as they did 10 years ago. It's not necessary to have over SPF 15 (according to these two) because if you are reapplying as regularly as you are supposed to you'll be just fine. Obv. higher than SPF 15 isn't going to hurt but it wears off your skin just as much as SPF 15 and an awful lot of people don't seem to realize just how often you have to reapply. I thought it was funny!

I like laying out in the sun and reading and jumping in and out of the pool and such. I'm notorious for using oils instead of "suncreams" so it's good they've got higher SPF oils now.

Allyzay will never stop making pancakes (allyzay), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:08 (nineteen years ago)

Emsk, I am surprised that you are type IV with your hair. Are you sure you've not just become one giant freckle? How can a ginge not get burned more easily than me? It's not fair.

I don't go out in the sun much at all. The sunscreen is just for those occasions when I know I'm going to be in the sun. (like, argh, this weekend, argh.) How often are you supposed to reapply?

Kaet (kate), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:12 (nineteen years ago)

i sometimes get the sun on me as a byproduct of playing frisbee. rather annoying, it makes my gamer skin smoke and blister immediately.

teh_kit is jayne without the tits (g-kit), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:26 (nineteen years ago)

kate yeah i know, but i've never really burned. apparently when i was a tiny baby my parents were ultra-protective of me in the sun - loads of suncream, hat, under an umbrella AND sitting in the shade wherever possible, then one day they forgot to put the suncream on me and when they realised and went to put some on i'd gone brown. plus we spent every summer outdoors swimming in seas and lakes and rivers, so i guess to an extent your skin gets used to it. but then i don't have the pale eyebrows and eyelashes you'd expect from a ginger either, i think i just lucked out, got my dad's skin and my mum's hair colour. my bro has brown hair but light lashes and he burn like lobster if he not careful.

emsk ( emsk), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:28 (nineteen years ago)

i always thought spf was a code for "if you stay in the sun for [spf factor here] hours, it's equivalent to staying out in the sun for 1 hour unprotected" - which would indeed make anything above spf 8 rather pointless but i assume i am wrong AGANE.

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:29 (nineteen years ago)

kate, i found SPF 60 at 7-11 the other week, so i dont know when you last looked for suncreen in the US, but it must have been more than 10 years ago.

i find my co-workers' obsessions with "getting a little sun" infuriating. when i wore said SPF 60 to play golf a few weeks ago, i was sort of mocked. like "WHOA, 60 SPF? DONT YOU WANT A LITTLE COLOR!?!?" -- no, i dont.

i've dreamt of rubies! (Mandee), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:34 (nineteen years ago)

It's not necessary to have over SPF 15 (according to these two) because if you are reapplying as regularly as you are supposed to you'll be just fine.

people usually tell me this when i bring out the spf 50. i know that there's at least some truth to it from the time that i got stuck using my friend's spf 8 and nothing bad happened (i reapplied lavishly and often), but it's a psychological comfort to have the super high factor.

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:51 (nineteen years ago)

I can't be arsed with it. I'd get bored shitless. I can't stand this sodding heat anyway so the chances of getting me to lie outside in it for ages is quite slim.

I'm a type II anyway, so I have to go through varying stages of burning before I start to tan. Except on my face, which seems to be type III.

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:59 (nineteen years ago)

I have currently got some sort of colour in my arms and chest and shoulders after the aforementioned burning incident last weekend. However, compared with my usual whiteness, I just look like a piece of meat that has been left in the oven too long, it doesn't look nice at all.

Kaet (kate), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 15:01 (nineteen years ago)

Something I hadn't realized until my dad had cataract surgery last year - if you don't protect your eyes from UV, you will get cataracts. I thought wearing sunglasses was more about not getting squint wrinkles.

I dislike the feel of sunblock on me, so I go more for hats and long sleeved/legged lightweight linen cover and shade.

Jaq (Jaq), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 15:15 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I mean as long as you reapply even the SPF 50 you're obviously well good to go and some people just feel a little bit better using a higher one. I think the dermos I spoke with were just really worried that people were assuming SPF 50 (or whatever) = longer lasting than SPF 15 = not reapplying, which they were seeing a lot of. Because yeah, theoretically Tracer is basically right* but it doesn't stop the fact that the formulas delivering the protection to your skin wear off at the same rate no matter what SPF they are carrying, normal sweating can do it even with water-resistant formulas. I liked it because higher SPF formulas irritate the hell out of my skin for some reason so it gave me an excuse to feel just fine with SPF 8 or 15. Not that I reapply as often as I should.

* OK it works like this Tracer, you're basically right BUT it's not based on hours. For example SPF 15 gives you 15 times the protection of your normal skin, ie take the amount of time it takes you to get burnt and multiply that by 15 and then you have how long you can stay in the sun with one application of SPF 15.

Allyzay will never stop making pancakes (allyzay), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 15:15 (nineteen years ago)

i heard the 'not necessary to have over spf 15' thing about spf 30 a while ago. i don't know... i burn so easily that 15 just doesn't seem safe to me, even if i'm just fooling myself, so i generally use 30.

i am trying my hardest to wear sunscreen every day but it's so nasty hot out and the sunscreen sometimes makes me feel so sticky and dirty (even the "grease-free feeling!" one). i've gotten a TINY bit of color so far this year, but no burns yet, which makes me feel quite accomplished! i really don't mind being white, though, and even if my arms or chest get a little bit of color, my legs will remain day-glo for all eternity.

tehresa needs more out of this relationship than she's willing to put in (tehres, Wednesday, 19 July 2006 15:23 (nineteen years ago)

I only have to step out in the sun to tan, it happens ridiculously quickly. I'm already considerable darker than I was a week or so ago. Obviously I don't really burn but it's only when I'm on holiday I stay in the sun for long periods.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 15:29 (nineteen years ago)

is it possible to be type I and not be a redhead??? (albinos excepted)

timmy tannin (pompous), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 15:43 (nineteen years ago)

Ally, tell me more about high-SPF formulas irritating your skin? My neck, and nowhere else, is all welty as of Saturday night (after beach). Could be a reaction to jewelry I wore last week or it cd be sensitivity to the Bullfrog (although I hope not, because that stuff works like the colloquial charm).

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 15:46 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, my mum and brother are both Type I. Bro is blonde, mum has brown hair.

Kaet (kate), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 15:52 (nineteen years ago)

I love England compared to the US because there is so much GREATER an awareness of sunscreen (i.e. not wanting to tan or burn or otherwise lobster out in an English fashion) and the like. I mean, the highest I remember being able to get in the US was sun factor 20 or something. Sun Factor 25 is normal here, and you can get up to 50, 60, 100 no problems.
OK, I know it's probably dangerous to use super high SPF stuff for long periods of time. But, having English skin acclimatised to English weather, anything more than 20 minutes tops in the sun and I lobster out. (As seen the weekend of Liz's memorial service.)

living in miami and thus having tons of anecdotal evidence, i can claim with confidence that if you buy sunscreen stronger than SPF 30 you are wasting your money. SPF 45, 50, 60, whatever - they don't protect you for any longer than 30. i guess you might want to pay for more peace of mind. still, if you can fool yourself that easily, i envy you.

a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 16:00 (nineteen years ago)

Emsk:

ihttp://www.uefa.com/ml/images/Players/220X220/30548.jpg

I am type II.V I think. My problem is that the subtle italianness of my skin colour means I look a sickly yellow for all but June-September, so when I do get the chance to tan (I go quite a nice golden colour) I like to take it if at all possible.

Earwig oh! (Mark C), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 16:13 (nineteen years ago)

Ally, tell me more about high-SPF formulas irritating your skin? My neck, and nowhere else, is all welty as of Saturday night (after beach).

I'm not sure what it is. I break out in tiny little bumps and hivey things. They look a bit like acne, or razor burn maybe? And itchy. The most recent time this happened I couldn't figure out, to be honest, if it was caused by sunscreen or bug spray or some kind of plant I came into contact with, but it's just that certain cream formulas have something in them that makes my skin go nuts so I just try to avoid. I do have an SPF 30 spray formula that doesn't seem to bother me but it wasn't until very recently that things over SPF 8 came in formulas other than thick cream (so, what I'm saying is that it's not the higher SPF per se, it's whatever is in the creamy formulas).

Allyzay will never stop making pancakes (allyzay), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 16:28 (nineteen years ago)

That sounds just like my infection/reaction, too. Rats. I wore necklaces on several days last week, and between trapping sweat and possibly having base metals in the clasps I think they oversensitized my neck skin, and the greasy gel was the last straw. It's the only thing that makes sense since I'm not rashy anywhere else.

Have they perfected the whole-body skin transplant, yet?? Jesus Christ, get on that already.

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 16:33 (nineteen years ago)

i dont get the whole 'oh you look healthier with a tan!' no. you look like your going to get cancer with a tan.

Depends on who's doing the looking. I find people with some color (whether congenital or acquired) to be much more pleasing to the eye. White legs? Dud!

dissonance in the divine accord (unclejessjess), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 16:37 (nineteen years ago)

i should start wearing sunglasses. i never have.

i've dreamt of rubies! (Mandee), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 16:42 (nineteen years ago)

i would shrivel up and die without sunglasses.

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 19:06 (nineteen years ago)

i need prescription ones desparately. my last pair gave up the ghost this past winter and I haven't gone to get more. maybe this weekend. . .

Ms. Misery TX (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 19:13 (nineteen years ago)

Type I
"Always burns; never tans."
("Your skin only reddens and freckles.)

HI DERE

Nunca Llueve (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 19:17 (nineteen years ago)

i have cuet lohan-like shoulder freckles right now and i wouldn't trade 'em for the best fake-n-bake tan in town.

Nunca Llueve (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 19:19 (nineteen years ago)

I don't tan and I don't try, but lying around in the shade reading a book/getting drunk/watching the world go by is classic to the max.

Let's hang out!

Also - I get those bumps, too, although I will get them any time I spend any significant time in the sun, even if I don't put any sunscreen on. This is apparantly called "sun rash." Bright sunlight also makes me sneeze. I spend all summer running from shady spot to shady spot and will alter my walking route to stay out of direct sunlight because clearly, I am not meant to be out in it.

Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 19:40 (nineteen years ago)

i've never had an itchy reaction from sunscreen, but certain cream formulas make my face/neck sting a bit. i don't have that issue with the sprays.

tehresa needs more out of this relationship than she's willing to put in (tehres, Wednesday, 19 July 2006 20:16 (nineteen years ago)

White legs? Dud!

White legs? Classic!

Fiery Jacques (fieryjacques), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 22:08 (nineteen years ago)

I am type 1, I think, though my arms and face seem to be veering into type 2 with age and practice at not being hidden for fear of turning into one giant freckle. I need a whole other category for my legs. Type 0 would cover it. "Never burns, never tans, never does anything except stay really really white".

ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 22:13 (nineteen years ago)

How often are you supposed to reapply sunscreen?

I'm pretty sure I've never had a real red-or-whatever sunburn but there is a burning kind of feeling that I get in the sun that is greatly alleviated by sunscreen. I just reapply whenever it feels like it's coming back, if I can.

Sundar (sundar), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 22:28 (nineteen years ago)

(As far as the thread question goes, brown envy = classic.)

Sundar (sundar), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 22:36 (nineteen years ago)

Reading this thread has made me want to get a tan! All over!

edward o (edwardo), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 23:09 (nineteen years ago)

i think you are supposed to reapply once per hour
xxpost

tehresa needs more out of this relationship than she's willing to put in (tehres, Wednesday, 19 July 2006 23:19 (nineteen years ago)

White legs? Classic!

-- Fiery Jacques (fieryjacque...) (webmail), Today 6:08 PM. (fieryjacques) (later)

hell yes!

sunny successor (katharine), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 23:49 (nineteen years ago)

also, doesnt tanning accelerate aging?

sunny successor (katharine), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 23:52 (nineteen years ago)

Is fake tanning super popular in the U.K., or is this trend restricted to footballers' wives?

Mary (Mary), Thursday, 20 July 2006 00:15 (nineteen years ago)

Emsk:
http://www.uefa.com/ml/images/Players/220X220/30548.jpg

who he?

emsk ( emsk), Thursday, 20 July 2006 07:18 (nineteen years ago)

Is fake tanning super popular in the U.K., or is this trend restricted to footballers' wives?

hahaha! it's all over the uk, to an extent, but mostly restricted to the types who aspire to be footballers' wives. also there seems to be a higher proportion of orange people in liverpool, manchester and essex. (i am not having a go at any of these places: i think liverpool is ace and some of the bits of essex without any people in are utterly gorgeous. just saying, like.)

i would love to understand the thinking behind it though. going and getting a fake tan - it's a bit dumb, but if you want people to think you've been on holiday and therefore have lots of money or if you're going on holiday soon and don't want to be the blue/white one at the beach the first day or something, fine, whatever blows up your skirt. but these people are ORANGE. do they not KNOW they are ORANGE? are they just brazening it out until it fades? but then they will try another one, which will also be ORANGE. and all their friends are ORANGE.

emsk ( emsk), Thursday, 20 July 2006 07:25 (nineteen years ago)

A lot of the high spf stuff is like trying to spread cheddar on you. I just go for the cheap factor 15 and 8 stuff an reapply all the time. I burn very easily.

Liverpool has about 3 tanning parlour per resident. There are high streets with every other shop boarded up bar a line of tanning salons.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 20 July 2006 07:32 (nineteen years ago)

I'm a type II and I burn but in any case I have a delightful skin disorder called polymorphic light eruption, which is like sun rash I suppose, only x10 and it doesn't go down for weeks. Even minor, accidental exposure to the sun gives me sore patches and nasty spots. OK in Manchester most of the time, bit tricky to manage on tropical diving holidays.

Zora (Zora), Thursday, 20 July 2006 07:49 (nineteen years ago)

Oh man, that guy is F.U.G.L.Y.. He's only ugly because of his tan, but still.. He reminds me of:

http://www.dinnerworld.be/upload/files/shop/1135862404/thumb_frikandel_extra.jpg

I'm a type three. Is that possible when you're blonde? Then again, I don't sit in the sun much. As a kid I hated the summer/sun so I avoided it as much as possible (by sitting in front of the telly for hours on end). But yeah I don't get a sunburn easily.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Thursday, 20 July 2006 07:56 (nineteen years ago)

I think that's his natural skin colour, Nath. He's Wes Brown, Manchester United defender and the most obvious celeb-with-dark-skin-and-ginger-hair I could think of.

Earwig oh! (Mark C), Thursday, 20 July 2006 09:26 (nineteen years ago)

doesn't that happen quite a lot with mixed-race people, they get dark skin and red/reddish tones in their hair?

emsk ( emsk), Thursday, 20 July 2006 09:56 (nineteen years ago)

we had a guy at my school was black with blond afro hair, he was like a walking benetton ad.

emsk ( emsk), Thursday, 20 July 2006 09:56 (nineteen years ago)

this is him (famous danish tv chef, i forgot about that!) but he seems to have shaved his head, bah.

http://www.robertuniverse.com/imagesstudy/Umahro%20portrait.jpg

emsk ( emsk), Thursday, 20 July 2006 09:58 (nineteen years ago)

I tan fairly easily - type VI. My girlfriend is a type II and have to say I love pale skin on girls - that whole celtic thing rocks. I think I'd chuck her if she used St. Tropez :)

Seriously though, anyone else find the whole modern tan obsession a bit much? I mean as I understand it, tans in the 19th century were just a sign that you spent your time toiling the fields. It was only when Coco Chanel came back from a trip to Africa bronzed that they took off.

Treblekicker (treblekicker), Thursday, 20 July 2006 11:35 (nineteen years ago)

I also find the modern obsession with computers a bit much! In the 19th century, people didn't even HAVE computers!

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 20 July 2006 11:43 (nineteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytical_engine

Treblekicker (treblekicker), Thursday, 20 July 2006 11:45 (nineteen years ago)

Phear my soccer sock tanline.

Rufus 3000 (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 20 July 2006 14:12 (nineteen years ago)

My sister knows a guy who actually bought a foot tanner to be rid of his unsightly white golf-feet.

Jaq (Jaq), Thursday, 20 July 2006 14:16 (nineteen years ago)

six years pass...

anyone still do this? i think this is the first time in England for a decade (at least) that there's even been a chance of this happening from just walking around outside for a few hours a day.

piscesx, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 07:15 (twelve years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.