who are your favorite political writers?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
mine:

walter karp (the great overlooked political writer of the last 50 years, author of "liberty under siege," the last word on reaganism, and "the politics of war," a brilliant revisionist look at america's involvement in the spanish-american war and WWI)
george orwell
jeffrey st clair (everyone bigs up cockburn but i've always found st clair a lot saner and funnier)
christopher hitchens maybe 1/3rd of the time
madison/hamilton in the federalist
karl marx (especially in the 1844 manuscripts)
hl mencken
mark twain
robert caro

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 23 July 2006 07:01 (nineteen years ago)

oh, i forgot:

albert camus
greil marcus (at least in lipstick traces and in the fascist bathroom)
hannah arendt

least favorites:
anyone who subscribes to that whole slimy mises institute libertarian "income tax is worse than the holocaust" school of thought - they're worse than fking ayn rand!
george will
andrew sullivan
hitchens 2/3rds of the time

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 23 July 2006 07:04 (nineteen years ago)

tom clancy

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 23 July 2006 07:45 (nineteen years ago)

Marge Piercy

Sara R-C (Sara R-C), Sunday, 23 July 2006 12:42 (nineteen years ago)

Walter Karp is fantastic.

John Stuart Mill, Orwell, George Will, Andrew Sullivan, and Christopher Hitchens are some favorites.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 23 July 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)

hans christian andersen ('the emperor's new clothes' tells you at least half of what you need to know about politics)

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 23 July 2006 14:54 (nineteen years ago)

lyndon larouche

timmy tannin (pompous), Sunday, 23 July 2006 15:36 (nineteen years ago)

Jonathan Swift, David Hume, Andre Breton, Albert Camus, Michel Foucault, Ezra Pound, J.K. Galbraith, R.D. Laing, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari.

Annie Get Your Gin (noodle vague), Sunday, 23 July 2006 16:36 (nineteen years ago)

Ezra Pound, eh?

To Pound Fascism was the culmination of an ancient tradition, continued in the personalities of Mussolini, Hitler, and the British Fascist Sir Oswald Mosley.

Pound had already studied the doctrines of the [German] ethnologist [Leo] Frobenius during the 1920's and gave a mystical interpretation of race. Cultures were the product of races, and each had its own soul, or "paideuma," of which the artist was the guardian.

In Mussolini, Pound saw not only a statesman who had overthrown plutocracy, but someone who had made politics an art form. Pound stated, "Mussolini has told his people that poetry is a necessity of State, and in this displayed a higher state of civilization in Rome than in London or Washington."

Writing in his 1935 book Jefferson and/or Mussolini, Pound explained: "I don't believe any estimate of Mussolini will be valid unless it starts from his passion for construction. Treat him as ARTIFEX and all the details fall into place ... The Fascist revolution was FOR the preservation of certain liberties and FOR the maintenance of a certain level of culture, certain standards of living ... "

Pound and his wife Dorothy settled in Italy in 1924. In 1933 he had a meeting with Mussolini, outlining his ideas for monetary reform.

He also became a regular contributor to the periodicals of Mosley's British Union of Fascists, met Mosley in 1936 and continued to correspond until 1959.

From the late 1930s he began to look increasingly toward the economic policies of Hitler and regarded the Rome-Berlin Axis as "the first serious attack on the usurocracy since the time of Lincoln."

In 1940, after having returned to Italy from a tour of the USA during which he attempted to oppose the move to war against the Axis, Pound offered his services as a radio broadcaster. The broadcasts called "The American Hour," began in January 1941. Pound considered himself to be a patriotic American. After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor he attempted to return to the USA, but the American Embassy refused him entry. With no means of livelihood, Pound resumed his broadcasts, attacking the Roosevelt administration and usury in a folksy, American style, with a mix of cultural criticism.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 23 July 2006 20:05 (nineteen years ago)

Now we know where Garrison Keillor got his schtick from.

milo z (mlp), Sunday, 23 July 2006 20:10 (nineteen years ago)

Pound's politics became reprehensible, that's a given. Does that mean I shouldn't love The Cantos? I don't share many of Swift's beliefs, either.

Annie Get Your Gin (noodle vague), Sunday, 23 July 2006 21:02 (nineteen years ago)

this confused me because The Cantos are poetry and you listed Pound as one of your favorite political writers? whatevs...Hitchens is still my favorite contemporary political writer and especially w/r/t Iraq I don't share his beliefs either.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 23 July 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

Mencken too -- in fact he's a lot like Hitchens in that I love his anti-clerical rants, cutting humor and literary sensibility while cringing at some of the political stances. History hasn't smiled on the German-American Bund etc...

Robt Caro seconded, thirded, fourthed and fifthed. Sixthed when his final LBJ installment comes out. Though I might call him a biographer and/or historian he began as a journalist and hence belongs in this category. His books are just untouchable.

I like Bob Herbert in the NY Times and EJ Dionne in the Wash Post -- hey I'm a liberal -- but can't make a case for them as great writers.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 23 July 2006 22:42 (nineteen years ago)

Foucault, Derrida, Edward Said. I like JK Galbraith too.

other political writers i have read semi-recently: kissinger (hated), chomsky (blah, okay, he is chomsky). Krugman, does he count as a JK Galbraith type? (He ws okay but i was mostly just reading his economics). Soon to be reading: John Stuart Mill and Thomas Hobbes, hopefully next weekend.

Dxy (Danny), Sunday, 23 July 2006 23:23 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, Camus and Orwell are great too.

Dxy (Danny), Sunday, 23 July 2006 23:24 (nineteen years ago)

1) the wealth of nations--smith
2) reflectiosn on the revoultion in france--burke
3) in praise of folly--erasmus
4) city of god--augustine
5) don quixote
6) hamlet
7) common sense--paine
8) fear and trembling kirkegardee
9 Mysterie of God concerning the whole Creation, Mankind Gerrard Winstanley
10) the birth of the clinic foucault
11) mumbo jumbo reed
12) hitchens book on kissenger
13) dhalgren, by delany
14 saids orientalism
15) the sermon on the mount
16) fritz fanon
17) spooners work on jury nullifaction
18) ficciones, by borges
19) William James pragitism
20) roger williams

anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 24 July 2006 06:15 (nineteen years ago)

I like a balance of opinion columnists: Thomas Friedman, Froma Harrop, Kathleen Parker, and George Will. George Will is actually my favorite "conservative" editorialist, because he actually bothers with thinking things through. He's certainly not nearly as vile as Mona Charen, Michelle Malkin, or Cal Thomas, who can't bother to actually think about what they're espousing, choosing instead to rehash theories that have long ago been proven false. Ann Coulter is nothing more than an overrated hack. Maureen Dowd jumped the shark a long time ago. And I refuse to take anyone seriously who professes to like Molly Ivins, who is just a big a phony as Coulter.

Good call on Christopher Hitchens. I really should read more of what he writes, because when I *do* read something from him, I can always (at least) understand where he's coming from. Hate Cockburn, though.

Phoenix Dancing (krushsister), Monday, 24 July 2006 07:06 (nineteen years ago)

george dangerfield

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Monday, 24 July 2006 07:09 (nineteen years ago)

you're prob right about george will, i just can't read him without cracking up since i saw this: http://snltranscripts.jt.org/89/89qsportsmachine.phtml

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 24 July 2006 08:16 (nineteen years ago)

What is with all the Christopher Hitchens love? Can someone plz direct me to actual instances of him not being a cock?

richardk (Richard K), Monday, 24 July 2006 08:29 (nineteen years ago)

he was good in the 80s.

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Monday, 24 July 2006 08:30 (nineteen years ago)

but a nob since iraq.

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Monday, 24 July 2006 08:30 (nineteen years ago)

plus he's always risked pomposity.

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Monday, 24 July 2006 08:31 (nineteen years ago)

hitch's book on kissinger is very well done - he's a much better writer than a lot of leftists (chomsky, say). even now he's occasionally good, he's just got a few insane obsessions which completely send him off the rails. to paraphrase paul berman on gore vidal, as soon as you say "bill clinton" he runs down the staircase screaming "CHARGE!" like the crazy guy in "arsenic and old lace."

i guess andrew sullivan's a lot saner than he used to be, but his post-9/11 fawning over bush and co was so repulsive that i can't take him seriously at all.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 24 July 2006 08:52 (nineteen years ago)

the kissinger book is very nicely presented.

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Monday, 24 July 2006 08:59 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.newstatesman.co.uk/200105140041.htm

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Monday, 24 July 2006 09:00 (nineteen years ago)

Hitchens' occasional forays on the Wall Street Journal editorial page find him at his best. Sadly, it's subscription-only and unlinkable. Overall The Journal's op-ed section is deservedly infamous and while I find the unsigned editorials to be toxic and delusional a couple of the columnists are very good prose stylists. Daniel Heninger and Dorothy Rabinowitz (now the paper's TV critic) are elegant and supremely logical essayists even if their underlying assumptions and beliefs are 100% wrong IM (not so) HO.

On the flip side, while I agree with him 99% of the time, the NY Times' Frank Rich is one of my least favorites. As a political writer he's a good theatre critic. His columns are lazy, meta-journalism at its worst, armchair rehashes of what he's seen on TV and collated from Nexus during the week. "Bloviating about bloviating" to employ one of his pretentious pet terms.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Monday, 24 July 2006 09:19 (nineteen years ago)


For all his neoconnery, Hitchens remains excellent on Palestine. And he can be a beautiful writer.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=11253

Pete W (peterw), Monday, 24 July 2006 09:41 (nineteen years ago)

Daniel Heninger and Dorothy Rabinowitz (now the paper's TV critic) are elegant and supremely logical essayists even if their underlying assumptions and beliefs are 100% wrong IM (not so) HO.

Good call on Henninger, who's superb (and with whom I agree probably 30% of the time).

As for Hitchens' latest, this should get leftists' blood pumping:

http://www.slate.com/id/2145889/?nav=tap3

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 24 July 2006 10:24 (nineteen years ago)

haha hitch's next book is entitled "god is not great: the case against religion."

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 24 July 2006 10:50 (nineteen years ago)

pithy!

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Monday, 24 July 2006 10:52 (nineteen years ago)

'one nation not actually under god'

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Monday, 24 July 2006 10:53 (nineteen years ago)

ten years pass...

Saw Ryan Lizza speak today, part of some series they have here every year called “Curious Minds.” The topic was Trump, of course.

He was excellent. Don’t think he hit a false note the whole 90 minutes. (The guy interviewing him, from Toronto’s Globe and Mail, seemed a little too eager to please.) Contrary to Lizza's residency on CNN, pretty sure I didn’t hear “double-down,” “pivot,” or “takeaway” the whole afternoon.

I brought along the New Yorker from 2008 with the famous Barry Blitt cover of Barack and Michelle (Lizza wrote the accompanying story), hoping to get it signed, and also something a friend and I had written that I wanted to pass along to him. No luck before it started, so after he finished I went to the side of the podium as he was leaving. The handler charged with taking care of him: “Sorry, we’ve only got 10 minutes” (before the next speaker--they actually had 30 minutes). I garbled something in response, the basic point being that getting a magazine signed and handing him a book would take approximately 15 seconds--he was standing right there. Nope, can’t do it.

I was furious, and, I’ll admit it, what I wanted to say was, “You know, a small part of the reason there’s a buffoon in the White House right now is that there are 60 million people who hate it when some weasel like you takes what seems like a very personable and approachable journalist and pretends he’s William Shakespeare so they can exercise the little bit of authority they’ve been granted.” I bet Ryan Lizza hasn’t been asked to sign something he’s written 25 times in his life (he hasn’t written a book yet)--I’m sure he’d be glad to do it.

Happily, the other handler politely took the magazine and the book back to him behind the curtain and came back with it signed.

clemenza, Sunday, 5 March 2017 00:57 (nine years ago)

Nice!

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 5 March 2017 01:00 (nine years ago)

Actually I get asked to sign things
at least 25 times a day, and so
my hand consistently aches!
I suffer through this long
signature in the hopes
that someone will
understand my
true pain,
R. Lizza

Karl Malone, Sunday, 5 March 2017 01:14 (nine years ago)

Shape poetry...it's a handgun!

clemenza, Sunday, 5 March 2017 01:21 (nine years ago)

The last words r pizza ever hears

Karl Malone, Sunday, 5 March 2017 01:25 (nine years ago)

r lizza

Karl Malone, Sunday, 5 March 2017 01:25 (nine years ago)

Walter Kirn, Lewis Lapham, Thomas Frank, Matt Taibbi

flappy bird, Sunday, 5 March 2017 06:03 (nine years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.