Let's talk about BUNGS!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Messers Allardyce and Redknapp seem to be protesting too much, the BBC is promising "explosive" evidence, and the agent at the centre of it all is using the Grobbelar defence: "I only went along with what the undercover hack was saying because I was SUSPICIOUS of him and wanted to know more".

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=Bungs

Thoughts, please.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 11:51 (nineteen years ago)

Redknapp's as bent as a, errrrrrrrrrrrrrr, very bent thing.

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 11:54 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.texasultimate.org/userpictures/beavis.jpg

S- (sgh), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 12:10 (nineteen years ago)

The only appropriate reaction.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 12:13 (nineteen years ago)

I remember just after the whole Fake Sheikh bung comments that ultimately ousted Sven, Redknapp was getting very irate. I'm pretty sure he said something almost exactly along the lines of "it's outrageous claiming there are bungs in football. I phoned Graeme Souness and he agreed it was ridiculous".

I am looking forward to this programme.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 13:05 (nineteen years ago)

I remember that and I remember that Redknapp's reaction seemed very suspicious as he hadn't actually been accused of anything

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 13:07 (nineteen years ago)

Thing is, Redknapp has to take the occasional bung to live in the international centre of finance that is Portsmouth. The cost of living there is 48 times that it is in Dubai.

Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 15:59 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe the Bolton manager needs a new nickname - Big Scam?

Mooro (Mooro), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:29 (nineteen years ago)

this wasn't a terribly good programme. weren't they making a gigantic logical blunder, in one particular "revealing" passage about big sam and his son? when big sam's son admitted, while talking to the undercover guy, that he had had unauthorised/unaccounted for involvement in a number of bolton transfers? and then they ring him up, openly, as a bbc journalist, and allardyce jnr says that there's full transparency between him and his father - and the conclusion was supposed to be that allardyce jnr had admitted big sam knew about his shady dealings. but surely allardyce jnr was saying this under the pretence that he hadn't been doing anything dodgy? ie. wasn't he saying "i have been only involved in above-board deals, and my father has full knowledge of these deals" - not "my father has knowledge of all my deals, corrupt or otherwise!!!"

not to defend some of the obviously seedy types caught on camera, but the whole thing felt a little underwhelming. i thought, maybe, we'd see something glaringly dodgy from 'arry or whoever, but it was mostly unsubstantiated gossip - we've heard gossip about managers liking bungs for years, surely the point of an explosive documentary is to catch them with their pants 100% down?

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:44 (nineteen years ago)

I suspect that the original programme might have dwelled on Millar's programme on Ferguson a few year's back, which is why the old git doesn't do any interviews on MOTD. That was all about his use of the sons of managers - like Allardyce, like Freddie Shepherd, like Bond is. It reminds me of the moans of people like John Gotti, who said that their hard work was wasted on idiot sons who had all the love of the life and none of the street smarts that got them there.

That mafia reference is telling though; how do you find out what really goes on when there's an omerta that pervades the sport? How can you get close to get the smoking gun you need? They're all paranoid, in a way reminiscent of Pauli Vario in Goodfellas not ever using a phone.

The trouble here really is that we tolerate it. Whilst people accept ticket price rises, whilst they laud players who agitate for moves to get signing-on fees etc, why should it change? The authorities are creatures of the regulated, and those regulated will always fight hard against any change. Government won't get involved - the high-water mark has passed, and even if they did, Uncle Sepp will always stamp on any governmental intervention to reform schlerotic structures that fail to protect the wider interests of the game ahead of the narrow interest of the actors within it.

Tonight's revelations will turn some more people off, like some were turned off by revelations of player misdemeanors, or leagues becoming uncompetitive, or contemptuousness from club officials. Football will eventually reap the rewards of this creeping distaste and disgust which will ultimately become indifference when the consumer credit boom comes to an end and people simply won't be able to afford those tickets.

Fucking depressing though; it may or may not be a beautiful game, but it's a dirty, disgusting and ugly sport.

Dave B (daveb), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:03 (nineteen years ago)

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42064000/jpg/_42064684_football_203152.jpg

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 22:08 (nineteen years ago)

sorry to beat a dead horse but I want to immortalize this forever:

Newell hopes bungs will be exposed

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 19 September 2006 22:45 (nineteen years ago)

I think Big Sam is going to find it hard to wriggle out of this — at the end of the day he was doing business with his son in breach of FA rules.

'Arry can probably get away with saying "Look, all I said was 'if you want to take me to the World Cup, I won't say no'".

The FA must act against Chelsea — they tapped up Frank Arnesen and now they have him tapping up players for them. He was caught on camera making an illegal approach. Simple as that. How long was Chelsea's three-point deduction suspended for? Middlesbrough fans will no doubt demand that it is invoked, especially as they're still a bit sensitive about three-point penalties up there.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 06:45 (nineteen years ago)

I think the Chelsea issue was more clear cut, unless Arneson comes out with the same lame Grobelaar defence.

I also wonder if Big Sam was behind the coup in Thailand in order to relegate the bung story from the top of News at Ten. I guess it could have been Allerdyce Jnr.

Mikey G (Mikey G), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 07:56 (nineteen years ago)

So much for the hype, what a disappointment this programme turned out to be. Allowing for the fact that we might not have been shown all the evidence accumulated by the programme makers, what did this programme actually prove? That if you approach a few sleazy gits with a cockamamie scheme for making pots of illicit wonga then they will run off at the mouth about various contacts they have and various managers they have in their pockets - but who, funnily enough, they prove to be singularly unsuccessful in ensnaring in the course of the programme. Hype, bluster and braggadocio is surely part of what being an agent is all about and that's mostly what we seemed to be getting in this programme. I mean going to Portsmouth and meeting Harry Redknapp IN THE CLUB CANTEEN(!) and getting him to say, "Yeah, Andy Todd, I like the boy" - it's hardly damning evidence is it?!?!

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:04 (nineteen years ago)

i don't understand what a bung is! people are talking about them and stuff, are they bad? are they in other sports?

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:06 (nineteen years ago)

It's that thing in basketball where one of the guys jumps up and shoves the ball through the little round thing

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:08 (nineteen years ago)

I think people are being a bit unfair on the programme maker.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:12 (nineteen years ago)

oh ok. why are they talking about it in football, is it like a goal or something?

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:12 (nineteen years ago)

John Wayne played a baseball manager who took a bung in a film, once.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:12 (nineteen years ago)

... the soundtrack was composed by David Byrne

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:13 (nineteen years ago)

are you taking the piss again? :(

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:14 (nineteen years ago)

I thought you were! :)

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:15 (nineteen years ago)

The programme led you to believe that the 'unfortunate timing' of Mike Newell's claims undid their big sting. This leads me to believe that Mike Newell was the intended target.

Mikey G (Mikey G), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:17 (nineteen years ago)

"Hype, bluster and braggadocio is surely part of what being an agent is all about and that's mostly what we seemed to be getting in this programme."

True, but they had four agents specifically saying that they get managers to take bungs, which should at least merit a proper investigation by the FA and maybe even the police.

Couple it with Jimmy Calderwood, Mike Newell and Svenis saying they have either been offered bungs or seen them being offered and there's clearly something rotten going on.

If nothing else, last night's programme showed that there is waaay too much money kicking around at the top level of the game and agents have waaaay too much influence.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:19 (nineteen years ago)

the newspapers don't even say what a bung is! they just say things like CORRUPTION and MONEY without explaining.

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:20 (nineteen years ago)

i hope you know what 'corruption' and 'money' mean, lex. you do want to be a journalist after all.

EARLY-90S MAN (Enrique), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:21 (nineteen years ago)

Um, that Mike Newell post was a joke by the way. No one could doubt the intergrity of a player who wore the claret and blue of West Ham or its manager at the time, Harry Redknapp.

Mikey G (Mikey G), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:22 (nineteen years ago)

Plus the accepted journalistic form is "money and corruption" not "corruption and money" (xpost)

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:23 (nineteen years ago)

i hope you know what 'corruption' and 'money' mean, lex. you do want to be a journalist after all.

oh god no i don't. i know what they mean but i don't know what a BUNG is.

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:24 (nineteen years ago)

what's that HST line, 'journalists can hardly say the word "corrupt" without pissing themselves out of pure guilt...'

EARLY-90S MAN (Enrique), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:25 (nineteen years ago)

you don't want to be a journalist... yet write for teh newspaper?

EARLY-90S MAN (Enrique), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:25 (nineteen years ago)

It's a bribe by a player's agent to a manager, with the aim of securing a transfer for that player.

I think.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:26 (nineteen years ago)

A bung is an apparatus used to seal a container, such as a bottle, tube or barrel. Unlike a lid which encloses a container from the outside without displacing the inner volume, a bung is partially inserted inside the container to act as a seal. The lids for safety overpacks for 55 gallon drums some times may have a bung built in[1] for access of the contents of the container. These may be referred to as fuel bungs.

A translation of Dante's Inferno to English from the original Italian uses the term "bung" when describing the grotesque appearance of a particular sinner who has been split from head to crotch, with his bowels (a "shriveled sac") trailing behind him. This punishment is seen in the area of Hell where the Sowers of Discord, a mangled, mutilated mess of souls, are corralled, indicating its roots date all the way to the 13th century.[citation needed]
* The word is the root of the insult "bunghole", which is commonly used by Beavis of the animated television show Beavis and Butt-head, which appeared on MTV during the 1990s. Beavis would pull his t-shirt over his head, put his arms out and up at ninety-degree angles and utter, "I need T-P for my bunghole." See also, Cornholio.
* In British slang, a bung is slang term for a bribe and is frequently used as a slang term for a cat. This reference to a cat is based on the slang "bunghole" and describes a mangy breed. The actual term is "the bung."
* In Australian slang, bung is used instead of "place". For example, if you had a lot of rubbish to throw away and your bin was full, a neighbour might see your predicament and say, "You can bung that in my bin." During a video night, someone might emplore you to "Bung in the next movie..." and so on. The use of the term, however, is in decline.
* The term bung may also be used in a slang reference to the anus.
* In the game of darts, the center bullseye is often referred to as the 'bung' or 'bunghole'.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:28 (nineteen years ago)

i don't understand why that is good or bad? i don't really understand 'transfers' though (i mean, i understand what they are, but i don't understand what the ethical etiquette is around them, and i don't understand the way they mean that a fan of one team might have to cheer against a player one week and then for them the next week).

you don't want to be a journalist... yet write for teh newspaper?

i like writing!

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:29 (nineteen years ago)

xp to tom

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:30 (nineteen years ago)

Basically what Tom said — player's agent is paid £XXX,XXX commission when a player signs for a new club, and "bungs" the club's manager a chunk of it to sweeten the deal.

So it basically involves the manager ripping off his own employer.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:31 (nineteen years ago)

And, very often, foisting an over-priced shit player on the club's long-suffering fan

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:33 (nineteen years ago)

...s

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:33 (nineteen years ago)

it's like a kick-back, which would be punnier also.

EARLY-90S MAN (Enrique), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:33 (nineteen years ago)

i'm not sure i understand why this is bad! so the player's agent pays the player's manager for taking the player away? isn't that just, you know, PAYING FOR THE PLAYER?

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:36 (nineteen years ago)

no.

EARLY-90S MAN (Enrique), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:37 (nineteen years ago)

what so are transfers normally for free??!!! that is insane!

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:39 (nineteen years ago)

no, no, no.

EARLY-90S MAN (Enrique), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:40 (nineteen years ago)

HERE BE DRAGONS.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:41 (nineteen years ago)

why do you all follow a sport which is so complicated and also CORRUPT. i feel completely lost trying to work this out!

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:42 (nineteen years ago)

Imagine the manager writing a cheque using the company's cheque book, and making it out to himself, personally.

That's it.

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:42 (nineteen years ago)

Think of it like a PR bribing a reviews editor to get prominent coverage for a rub band. Readers aren't happy, publication isn't improved, band are still rub, reviews editor and PR person do well out of it. I am sure this kind of thing happens all the time in the shoddy corrupt world of music so called journalism which is why you aren't shocked by it.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:43 (nineteen years ago)

lex, the manager is tempted to take a player purely to get cash for himself, rather than to get a player that will do well for the club. this is secret from the club, because it benefits the manager personally, and not the club, who are then stuck with paying wages of a player they don't want or need. the manager eventually leaves the club, having pocketed a wedge of cash numerous times, while the club is stuck with players on long contracts on high wages, that aren't good enough for the club.

eventually the club gets relegated, and income lessens, but they are still committed to paying the players wages, which they can no longer afford. eventually the club is forced to go bankrupt, and many jobs are lost, and there is a knock on effect, on the local economy.

the manager, meanwhile, buys a new villa on the cote d'azur

Tommy Woodry (tommywoodry), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:43 (nineteen years ago)

Lex, the clubs are at the simplest level run by chairmen, who sit on the club's money themselves. This chairman pays the players and the coaching staff, and also pays the other clubs' chairmen for transfers. The manager is paid to coach the team and select which players he wants the chairman to buy. The chairman has the final say as to whether the funds will be well spent.

If a player's agent pays the manager directly to influence his decision, the money has not gone through the chairman, and the most important link in the chain has been bypassed. Hence corruption.

Tommy has put it better than me, anyway.

Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 08:45 (nineteen years ago)

Did you read Tommy Woodry's post earlier in the thread?

the manager is tempted to take a player purely to get cash for himself, rather than to get a player that will do well for the club. this is secret from the club, because it benefits the manager personally, and not the club, who are then stuck with paying wages of a player they don't want or need. the manager eventually leaves the club, having pocketed a wedge of cash numerous times, while the club is stuck with players on long contracts on high wages, that aren't good enough for the club.

eventually the club gets relegated, and income lessens, but they are still committed to paying the players wages, which they can no longer afford. eventually the club is forced to go bankrupt, and many jobs are lost, and there is a knock on effect, on the local economy.

the manager, meanwhile, buys a new villa on the cote d'azur

To which I added the aspect of the club being forced to generate more revenue directly from fans, leading to increased ticket prices, leading to fans being priced out etc

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 11:47 (nineteen years ago)

Also, if a player is good, there's no reason for an agent to have to bribe a manager to sign him: the player is more likely to be mediocre, at the end of his career or untested

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 11:50 (nineteen years ago)

... or injury prone of course!

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 11:51 (nineteen years ago)

did dowie take a bung for djimi traore? :(

Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 11:53 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, but that just seems to be a bit of a stretch. The same problems could ensue from any player acquisition that doesn't work out. I'm not condoning it, but it's hardly taking bribes to throw a match. Based on the evidence I'm aware of, it still feels as though the BBC is shit-stirring for the sensationalism of it all. Now everything is going to get bogged down in this mess.

The Ultimate Conclusion (lokar), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 11:54 (nineteen years ago)

Though you're right about the mediocrity of the player.

The Ultimate Conclusion (lokar), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 11:54 (nineteen years ago)

Where's Dave Boyle when you need him? So who eventually pays for the kickbacks, because kickbacks have to be paid for eventually - the fans of course! Plus honest football directors/ chairman (yes, there are some) - didn't you see that play with Ray Winstone, "You're wobbling like fucking jelly!!!! Wobble wobble wobble!!!!!!"

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 11:58 (nineteen years ago)

I dunno. I was reading on another forum about this causing people to be 'disillusioned' with the game. I can't see that at all, though.

The Ultimate Conclusion (lokar), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:05 (nineteen years ago)

Call me old fashioned, but I tend to not think bribery and corruption is a very good idea

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:07 (nineteen years ago)

Again, not condoning the idea, just saying I'm not all that surprised and find it odd that others are. Of all the scandal that surrounds so many aspects of football, I don't find it all that shocking that certain agents and managers are corrupt.

The Ultimate Conclusion (lokar), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:21 (nineteen years ago)

Errrrrrrrrrrrrrr, absolutely no-one in the known universe is surprised about this!

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:24 (nineteen years ago)

Which is why I don't understand the 'disillusioned' comments some have made on other boards.

The Ultimate Conclusion (lokar), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:26 (nineteen years ago)

this is no 'other board' my good man.

EARLY-90S MAN (Enrique), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:27 (nineteen years ago)

It's disillusioning to have (some of) your worst supicions confirmed, non?

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:28 (nineteen years ago)

If they were already suspicions, what were the illusions? Disappointed, I would understand. But disgusted with the game of football because what always seemed likely has been somewhat kind of confirmed with flimsy evidence aired on the BBC? There are a lot better reasons to be disgusted with the game of football, or at least professional football.

The Ultimate Conclusion (lokar), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:31 (nineteen years ago)

It's disillusioning to find that something you suspect is more likely to be true than not, so the potential crutch that it was all hearsay is not available. Then, you realise that the path to doing something about it simply won't happen, and that the people charged with acting for the wider integrity of the game can't and won't act here, and that you have to take a choice - do you shrug your shoulders and accept it, or express your disillusionment and walk away?

That's not nice at all. It might be similar to other sports, but on a personal and psychological level, it hurts.

Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:34 (nineteen years ago)

I suppose. Perhaps I can't empathize properly on this issue. To me, it seems that the fact that you can essentially buy a Premiership title takes a lot of the integrity out of the sport.

The Ultimate Conclusion (lokar), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:38 (nineteen years ago)

"Say it aint so, Sam!"

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:48 (nineteen years ago)

Just walked by an electronics shop down the road, and the televisions facing the street the window had Sam's little 30 second press conference playing. I shook my head in shame and disappointment. Then I remembered his total lack of focus towards the end of the season where he would continue to play the same team and the same tactics and lost pretty much every week, and thought, 'would it be so bad if he were to go?' I know it's sacrilige, but hey, us Bolton fans are used to mediocrity and disappointment.

The Ultimate Conclusion (lokar), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 13:25 (nineteen years ago)

Allardyce insisted he had been the innocent victim of the "greed" of others on the programme.

He said: "I am very angry at the lies told about me. The individuals who appeared in the programme making accusations against me have already confirmed in writing to my lawyers they lied to the BBC.

"They lied in the hope of being able to make millions offered by the BBC reporter to buy their sports agency business.

"Those individuals never thought their lies would be exposed in the way they have been and have apologised to me.

"As a result of their greed, my good name has been tarnished by deceit and innuendo."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/5363942.stm

The Ultimate Conclusion (lokar), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)

Oh right, now I get it! You're a Bolton fan!

Oh No It's Dadaismus! (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)

The sporting press has turned us into a very defensive bunch. Especially because Bolton tend to be a very defensive bunch.

The Ultimate Conclusion (lokar), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 14:28 (nineteen years ago)

There was a laughable comment from a Bolton ST holder on 5Live last night that they expected this kind of thing from a foreign manger, but not someone like Sam. Heh

I wonder if part of it is a generation of older players still in the game, who were brought through the game when the rewards compared to today were comparatively low against today, and they've decided that it's justified to wet your beak in a deal. Older generations who might feel similarly aggreived are unable to do anything save be rueful about being a player at the wrong time, but this lot are able to skim a bit here and there.

Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 15:28 (nineteen years ago)

The thing is, isn't this more common in the British game than on the Continent? Eriksson seemed to imply as much.

Am I Re-elected Yet? (Dada), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 15:31 (nineteen years ago)

"The individuals who appeared in the programme making accusations against me have already confirmed in writing to my lawyers they lied to the BBC."

So that's his son, then?

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 16:04 (nineteen years ago)

Should it come to it, I suggest Warren Clarke plays Sam in Bungs: The Motion Picture. "He took an unfashionable club from a skanky mill town to the brink of European qualification. The only thing he loved more than football was money."

Mikey G (Mikey G), Thursday, 21 September 2006 09:45 (nineteen years ago)

Did he lie when he was seventeen? (xpost)

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 21 September 2006 09:48 (nineteen years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/n/newcastle_united/5378844.stm

Kevin Bond : Gone'd.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 10:05 (nineteen years ago)

Aw, poor Kevin. I'm fond of him, largely because he was the subject of the classic "2-4-6-8 overweight" song during his playing days at our place.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 10:37 (nineteen years ago)

'gardening leave'?

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 10:42 (nineteen years ago)

D. Boyle spake thus :
**It's disillusioning to find that something you suspect is more likely to be true than not, so the potential crutch that it was all hearsay is not available. Then, you realise that the path to doing something about it simply won't happen, and that the people charged with acting for the wider integrity of the game can't and won't act here, and that you have to take a choice - do you shrug your shoulders and accept it, or express your disillusionment and walk away?**

In advance anticipation of those responsible doing not much of anything about saving the integrity of this tawdry mess of a sport, I have made my choice. I'm done with football. It started being important to me in around 1969 (Man City v Leicester cup final) and I settled on a team in 1970(the team formerly known as Chelsea). I've laughed, cried and ranted at/with Cloughie, Gazza, Peter Osgood, Keegan, Ron Harris, Charlie George, Spain 82, Italia 90 and on and on. Last Saturday, after the bung fuss, the embarassment of the World Cup, the Ashley Cole saga, yet more Mourinho nonsense, continual referee-bashing, Ben Thatcher et al....I realised that I really don't give a shit about football any more.

Goodbye, the once beautiful game. It used to be fun.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 10:51 (nineteen years ago)

Try non-league (and not fancy schmancy 1000+ fan semi-pro non-league - get down to your local Kent league 2nd division side), you might like it.

=== temporary username === (Mark C), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 11:07 (nineteen years ago)

tennis isn't as corrupt as football because it's a bit crapper than football and so there's not enough money in it for it to be worth the hassle.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 11:19 (nineteen years ago)

it's the same reason as to why there are very few reported cases of corruption in the game of indoor bowls.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 11:20 (nineteen years ago)

crown-green, on the other hand...

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 11:23 (nineteen years ago)

**Try non-league (and not fancy schmancy 1000+ fan semi-pro non-league - get down to your local Kent league 2nd division side), you might like it.**

Kent? Where's that?

No, I'm helping to coach an U-14 Rugby team on Sat mornings and have idiotically come out of retirement for a few games myself (for 'veterans' not U-14).

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 11:30 (nineteen years ago)

i'm not disillusioned about football but then I like WWE wrestling, so i'm used to things not being all real.

PLAYING football has always been more fun anyway.

xpost!

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 11:32 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/luton_town/7097084.stm

Herman G. Neuname, Thursday, 15 November 2007 17:03 (eighteen years ago)

Mike Newell's club?

Tom D., Thursday, 15 November 2007 17:08 (eighteen years ago)

yep

Herman G. Neuname, Thursday, 15 November 2007 17:13 (eighteen years ago)

Now it all makes sense

Tom D., Thursday, 15 November 2007 17:15 (eighteen years ago)

His name isn't mentioned anywhere.
Full article is up now

The Football Association has issued more than 50 charges in connection with alleged breaches of rules at Luton Town, after an extensive investigation.

The charges relate to player transfers and contract renegotiations between July 2004 and February 2007.

The club, former chairman Bill Tomlins, ex-finance director Derek Peter and current directors John Mitchell and Richard Bagehot have been charged.

Six licensed players' agents have also been charged.

The investigation, which began in March this year, found that payments made to the six agents, totalling around £160,000, by the club's holding company Jayten (also known as J10) Stadium Limited were not disclosed to the FA on the required forms.

The six agents have been charged with knowingly accepting payments from Jayten for their services to the club in securing the services of players.

In addition, it has been alleged that services for the benefit of a Luton player, totalling approximately £7,000, were paid for directly by Jayten but were not disclosed on the player's contract.

The full charges are as follows:

*
Luton Town have 17 charges, relating to payments to agents for nine specific player negotiations which were allegedly made through Jayten, rather than through the club as required by FA rules.

*
The Hatters have also been charged with provision of misleading information to the FA, not holding representation contracts with the relevant agents for the above negotiations, and dealing with two unlicensed agents (both through Jayten and directly).

*
Former chairman Bill Tomlins has been handed 15 charges. It is alleged that he was directly involved in 19 of the rule breaches listed above (except negotiations with two unlicensed agents which were not conducted through Jayten).

*
Former finance director Derek Peter is alleged to have approved payments made by Jayten in relation to the nine player negotiations.

*
Current directors John Mitchell and Richard Bagehot are charged with failing to report the alleged rule breaches to the FA when they became aware of them.

*
Licensed players' agents Sky Andrew, Mike Berry, Mark Curtis, Stephen Denos, David Manasseh and Andrew Mills are each charged with failing to ensure that payments to them were made and disclosed through the proper channels, and failing to enter into representation contracts with the club for specific services rendered in relation to to above negotiations.

All parties have until 30 November to respond to the charges.

Luton have said that no-one was available to comment.

There is no indication yet as to what punishments might be enforced if the charges were proved.

Herman G. Neuname, Thursday, 15 November 2007 17:43 (eighteen years ago)

Harry Redknapp arrested over alleged corruption

Herman G. Neuname, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 18:47 (eighteen years ago)

They've updated the report now with

Rangers player and Senegalese international Amdy Faye was also arrested in Glasgow.

The arrests are part of City of London Police's ongoing inquiry into alleged corruption, a spokeswoman said.

The BBC understands that Scottish football agent Willie McKay is one of the other men arrested.

Mr McKay oversaw Mr Faye's 2005 transfer from Portsmouth to Newcastle United for £2m.

Herman G. Neuname, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 20:53 (eighteen years ago)

Arry Bom Ba Ye

Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 20:56 (eighteen years ago)

four months pass...

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7339447.stm

Herman G. Neuname, Wednesday, 9 April 2008 20:43 (eighteen years ago)

I laffed.

Michael Philip Philip Philip philip Annoyman, Thursday, 10 April 2008 08:23 (eighteen years ago)

Strange things going on at Birmingham City

Tom D., Thursday, 10 April 2008 09:00 (eighteen years ago)

She's almost certainly a horrible human being, but am I allowed to find Karren Brady hot?

Matt DC, Thursday, 10 April 2008 13:22 (eighteen years ago)

I think you are obliged to. Although she's no Peter Kenyon.

Upt0eleven, Thursday, 10 April 2008 13:44 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.