Gnosticism vs. Kabbalism, FITE!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I can't decide which is a better way to like culture. Also, ecstatic vs. scholastic kabbalism, FITE!

Sterling Clover, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i.e. is culture a battlefield where the divine is given earthly form, or is culture the hunt for fragments of the divine. And are those fragments enlightening through the ecstatic instant or prolonged and serious study?

Sterling Clover, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The latter. And both.

Michael Daddino, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Interesting question Sterling. I'm not an expert on either, but they both have their roots in Jewish/Egyptian/Persion mysticism don't they? I think you've got to prepare for the ecstatic instant through serious study, otherwise you become lost and disoriented e.g. psychosis.

Chris Sallis, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

yeah if you get into that stuff @ yr age you will certainly go insane. bill fosby told me & he knew.

, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

let's all build a GOLEM!!

mark s, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I second the golem suggestion. anyone got a good shem for his forehead?

misterjones, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I have some friends off to Prague in a week or so, I'll get them to bring back a suitcase of clay from the river bed. Anyone got a nice big oven (gas). Then we're sorted. Or what about making lots of tiny golems instead -- then we can all have one each.

Alan Trewartha, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Hasn't Anthony Gormley done that already?

chris, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

that was just art: this will be MAGIC!!

mark s, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Mark, what do you reckon to the Royal Tenenbaums?

Alan Trewartha, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i larfed non-stop and so did dr vick

mark s, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

SIX sinker you mentalist

Josh, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I like to give the Gods an earthly form. I find it easier. Anyway, that's all there is to it. Don't you see, it was all metaphors?

Alix, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I give up.

Chris, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

one year passes...
Should I make a golem this weekend?

rosemary (rosemary), Thursday, 20 March 2003 23:43 (twenty-three years ago)

You're making a Golem at the weekend? Won't it go mad?

Al_Ewing, Friday, 21 March 2003 00:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Anyone read Elaine Pagels' "The Gnostic Gospels?"

slutsky (slutsky), Friday, 21 March 2003 04:59 (twenty-three years ago)

I have ... I don't like Pagels generally, but that's the one to read. (The problem I have with other Pagels books is that her work on gnosticism is what made her famous, so she reads it into everything, to the detriment of her scholarship.)

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 21 March 2003 05:13 (twenty-three years ago)

I see what you're saying. I've actually only read the Gnostic Gospels and part of her Satan book, which seemed to tread upon the same lines (although the historical context she's working in is one I've always been fascinated with).

slutsky (slutsky), Friday, 21 March 2003 05:21 (twenty-three years ago)

The Satan book is good for what it is -- it's just not what it sounds like, if you see what I mean. The gnosticism angle tinges everything. (Granted, this is a bias I've picked up because when I read a lot of other books, I have to wade through arguments against Pagels which are necessary only because she's so well-known). If I had a better connection right now, I'd hit my Amazon wishlist to remind myself of the author of "Rethinking Gnosticism" -- which seems to be a counter-argument against Pagels et al., but I haven't read it so can't say for sure. (I know he argues that gnostics were not as common as they are sometimes portrayed, and that many texts sometimes labeled "gnostic" weren't written by gnostics but were appropriated later -- but I have no idea what his evidence is.)

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 21 March 2003 05:26 (twenty-three years ago)

That sounds worth checking out. Thanks, Tep!

slutsky (slutsky), Friday, 21 March 2003 05:31 (twenty-three years ago)

The Complete Gospels, edited by Funk, have the Gospel of Thomas, among other gnostic and semignostic texts.

anthony easton (anthony), Friday, 21 March 2003 07:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Is that Funk, Hoover and the Jesus Project?

(Which, by the way, is the best band name that's not really a band name EVER.)

slutsky (slutsky), Friday, 21 March 2003 07:05 (twenty-three years ago)

two years pass...
They are the same thing!

Any of you familiar with the idea that God = Satan = Lucifer = Christ = The Serpent = Adam = Metatron, etc.?

Or whatever names you choose to use. These names above simply represent ideas, anyway.

Point is, they are all aspects (ideas) of the "One." In other words, manifestation came as a result of Reason (the Universe is mental, thought becomes Reality): Spirit -> Air -> Fire -> Water -> Earth. The One created by separation, not by multiplication. First, One differentiated Self from Other. And then Both from All. Here, we have the first occurance of "Time". The relationship between A, B and C creates "Time." This separating or limiting aspect has been attributed to Saturn, which is where the name Satan comes from. In the Bible, of course, YHVH-Elohim (Jehovah God) gets the credit for Creation. And what is this creation but the illusion of separateness? So, here we have a relationship between God and Satan. Some Gnostics consider YHVH the Devil because he imprisoned us in this illusion of earthly matter.

If Reason is the thing that is "trapped" in matter, it is also the only way to free oneself from the "trap".  What else is there? There is only matter! With Reason, we have discovered Yoga, the Wisdom to Unite and the Understanding of Union. The Serpent of Temptation is the cause of delusion which tells you to believe your 5 senses, but The Serpent of Wisdom is the redeemer by right-thought and right-action, ie. discrimination. Not discrimination in order to differentiate but to discriminate to UNITE. So, this same power of reason and discrimination is used to cause either illusion or liberation; it is 2 sides of 1 pole of the same thing. Unity causes liberation, separation causes illusion. The is the Serpent of Temptation or Wisdom in Genesis. It is the mirror of Jehovah who says, "the world is as it is-- don't touch that Tree." The Serpent says, "the world isn't how it is, go ahead and eat from the Tree." This Serpent became "Satan" in the Christian version, but without the Jews' consent.

I think what is really trying to be explained is that manifestation happened out of necessity to distinguish "self" from "other". This is the Jehovah-action, the YHVH formula that manifests Thought into Reality. A key player in this was the idea of limits and time, represented by Bina and Saturn. But, the greater Reality is that it is nothing but an illusion. And this is tied right into the illusion; it is the flipside of "reality." Christianity got it all backwards and placed all the blame of the misery of the world on an imaginary "Satan." It is all the One "being." That One is us in our co-created hologram of a reality. The Serpent has nothing to do with "Satan." The Serpent is the logic of the Universe that swallows its own tail (Oroborous) and when it finds it's own ass again it says, "Hey, there I am! Wake up!" The Serpent is the DNA, the fibonacci, the swirling of galaxies, the swirling of Reason itself which can unlock the puzzle ("the First Swirlings"). It is also the Redeemer because it created all this and it can remember itself within each of us to liberate us from bondage. 666 is Kabbalistically the number for the Christ as well as the Beast!

More details here:
http://www.wisdomworld.org/additional/christianity/Satan-Jehovah.html

Melonheaded Sealman, Wednesday, 1 March 2006 22:28 (twenty years ago)

union of opposites, yo.

senseiDancer (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 23:23 (twenty years ago)

TOP SECRET: da troof

latebloomer: where dignity goes to die (latebloomer), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 23:37 (twenty years ago)

http://www.barbarakrakowgallery.com/stuff/contentmgr/files/e908a9581dd11cea148aa75220e43420/img_one/lp_wojnarowicz.ones.jpg

kingfish da notorious teletabby (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 23:41 (twenty years ago)

Gnostibbalism is the syncretic truth of the ages.

M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 2 March 2006 03:51 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.