'sokay.
― goole, Sunday, 28 September 2008 23:34 (seventeen years ago)
real scattershot, like 20 movies in one - script would make nabisco's head explode with its sloppiness~~~
johnny legs cameo was tyte, omar from the wire goes down like a bitch
first third or so plays out like a coen bros comedy, real slapstick-y
cool part when a babby gets bayonneted
― cankles, Sunday, 28 September 2008 23:51 (seventeen years ago)
bayoneted
― cankles, Sunday, 28 September 2008 23:52 (seventeen years ago)
Would've been a lot better w/out the bookends.
― David R., Sunday, 28 September 2008 23:59 (seventeen years ago)
there are like 14 people in this movie who are only in 1 scene
― goole, Monday, 29 September 2008 00:14 (seventeen years ago)
scenes with the nice nazi commander dude were the worst - love the moment when his superior tells him to shoot partisans on sight, since they're TERRORISTS it's not against the geneva convention HMMM it really makes u think!
― cankles, Monday, 29 September 2008 00:21 (seventeen years ago)
haha
― s1ocki, Monday, 29 September 2008 00:27 (seventeen years ago)
eh this kind of falls apart the more i think about it.
plus i'm spoiled by band of brothers, which set about as high a bar as you can for staging and filming battle sequences
― goole, Monday, 29 September 2008 14:38 (seventeen years ago)
This looks awful.
― Alex in SF, Monday, 29 September 2008 16:02 (seventeen years ago)
it's getting some eviscerating reviews
― Vichitravirya_XI, Monday, 29 September 2008 16:55 (seventeen years ago)
It's totally earned them.
― David R., Monday, 29 September 2008 16:58 (seventeen years ago)
srsly! all the Joseph Gordon-Levitt/John Turturro/Kerry Washington stuff could've been OK if they'd gotten more than one scene each, but as is it was just kind of a weak framing device. also i HATED that they had the same actor play the main character in both eras, his old man makeup was awful.
i liked parts of this movie a lot, flawed as it was, and i think i actually made my review more positive than it could've been after i saw how low its metacritic/rotting tomatoes ratings were and kinda took pity on it.
― some dude, Monday, 29 September 2008 17:01 (seventeen years ago)
there is never a reason to cut kerry washington from a movie
― and what, Monday, 29 September 2008 17:02 (seventeen years ago)
yeah i had zero complaints abt the kerry washington cameo, movie would've been better if it was just her and leguizamo fightin ratzis
― cankles, Monday, 29 September 2008 17:04 (seventeen years ago)
If only Spike dealt more w/ the religion vs. myth stuff, and actually gave a shit about his characters, and didn't reach for Moments of Cinematic Greatness. But hey boobies!
There is never a reason to waste Kerry Washington on a 2-line cameo!
cankles otm
― David R., Monday, 29 September 2008 17:04 (seventeen years ago)
ain't complainin' about chix factor when this lady was in the movie tho:
http://www.agencesimpson.fr/IMG/jpg/securedownload-1.jpg
― some dude, Monday, 29 September 2008 17:05 (seventeen years ago)
is that dude from placebo?
― and what, Monday, 29 September 2008 17:07 (seventeen years ago)
lol
― Jordan, Monday, 29 September 2008 17:10 (seventeen years ago)
oh yeah leguizamo was in this too, wasn't he. making out with someone? and he's a nazi art dealer? in italy? for one scene?
― goole, Monday, 29 September 2008 17:12 (seventeen years ago)
haha yeah. his part was so small that i forgot about it when listing all the other notable small roles!
― some dude, Monday, 29 September 2008 17:31 (seventeen years ago)
thank god we didn't get more than five minutes of Gordon-Levitt spouting antiquated cop movie banter, though, one Brick was enough.
― some dude, Monday, 29 September 2008 17:32 (seventeen years ago)
This was mediocre, but not flagrantly so. Had the same structural problems as Saving Private Ryan.
― Eric H., Monday, 29 September 2008 19:04 (seventeen years ago)
Then again, most war movies are pretty dull to me.
mostly this seems like a lot of wasted opportunities to me. there are plenty of great stories of black service in ww2 that could be mined, so there's that. nothing much was made of the "now" story being set in the 80s and not 2008. the love triangle was arbitrary. the ideological conflicts within the americans, italians and germans were ham-fisted and not mapped into each other with any grace at all. the visual logic of the gunplay was sub-john wayne, especially embarrassing considering the swipe at the duke that opens the movie.
it seems the point of the film is to tell the story of how the statue head, the luger, the soldier and the partisan make it out of tuscany and into NYC but not much of the film is concerned with that, so "script would make nabisco's head explode" otm.
kudos for having so little english dialogue tho
― goole, Monday, 29 September 2008 19:41 (seventeen years ago)
been a long time since ive seen a movie that was as simultaneously terrible and good
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Sunday, 29 March 2009 17:19 (seventeen years ago)
simultaneously good-bad and terrible-bad
― Nurse Detrius (Eric H.), Sunday, 29 March 2009 18:17 (seventeen years ago)