― gareth, Tuesday, 30 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― jel --, Tuesday, 30 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Pete, Tuesday, 30 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I've had a few majorly crap ones but they were mainly from one friend who used an old burner at work which was designed for data not audio.
― Winkelmann, Tuesday, 30 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I imagine there are many tiny gaps in the data and your playback device is resorting to huge amounts of interpolation to plough through it - hence the crackles.
The reflectivity of CD-Rs is much lower than regular pressed CDs, so devices with marginal laser power (battery-powered portables, older CD players) may struggle with them. Also, if skip-protection is turned on with a modern Discman, the playing speed is higher and the machine has to work even harder at error concealment - hence drop- outs.
DVD players also struggle with CD-Rs (unless they're fitted with an extra 780nm laser), but, funnily enough, usually *can* play CD-RWs.
― Michael Jones, Tuesday, 30 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Graham, Tuesday, 30 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
You may be out of luck with that Sony. CD-RWs are not supposed to be as 'invisible' to 650nm light as CD-Rs, although they have lower reflectivity (hence older CD players not dealing with them at all), so DVD players can deal with them. You may have an unfortunate combination of lower laser power and single 650nm laser which means CD-Rs and CD-RWs are not readable. There are allegedly 1st-gen DVD machines around which handle CD-RW, so I'm not sure what Sony did wrong.
Maybe the higher-speed CD-RWs (over 4x), which *are* differently constructed, offer greater reflectivity? They depends on you having access to a CD-RW drive that works with the higher-speed media.
― Ron, Tuesday, 30 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
BTW, I bought a bootleg at a swap meet after playing on their portable player, but when I got it home it would not play on any of my three portable CD players, nor on two computers. They act like it's a blank disk, and I don't see any difference in reflectivity on it. Could this be a CD-RW disk? I'll try it on my DVD player tonight.
― nickn, Tuesday, 30 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
At the center of the disk one revolution contains less data (because it's physically shorter), so the disk has to spin at a faster RPM to maintain the data rate, so it will vibrate more. I think. (high-speed CD-R drives (>8x) step up the data rate as they go, so the disk ends up spinning at a fairly constant speed).
Michael: I only have a 4x burner (cos it's USB).
Graham's right - audio CDs are typically read/written in Constant Linear Velocity mode, which means that the data-transfer rate is maintained throughout the disc = faster spin speed near the centre.
Some newer CD-burners use Z-CLV, which is a zonal version of the above - data rate is constant up to a point (say 16x), then is ramped up a few minutes into the disc (20x) and eventually undergoes another step-wise increase (24x). This suggests to me that super-fast burning where the pit-spiral is tightest and the spindle speed highest is to be avoided, probably due to stress/vibration issues as Graham says. Hence the problems Gareth has at the beginning of those CD-Rs.
High-speed CD-ROM drives use CAV (constant angular velocity) for reading - spindle speed remains constant = data throughput increases.
Now, will someone explain to me why the World Cup '98 DVD I picked up in Sainsbury's in Penge (for 50p!) isn't recognised by my DVD-ROM drive?
― Michael Jones, Wednesday, 31 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Monday, 3 March 2003 14:41 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ed (dali), Monday, 3 March 2003 14:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan I., Monday, 3 March 2003 17:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 01:05 (twenty-three years ago)