Pop About Pop

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
We might as well go the whole meta-hog. Songs about the state of music, or commenting on music - so for instance N'Sync's "Pop", M's "Pop Muzik", XTC's "Funk Pop A Roll", and so on. These tend to be of two types - one is decrying the state of music, one is celebrating it. Are any of these songs any good, or is there something a bit shrill about them?

A special case here is hip-hop, where a vast number of songs seem to be about the state of rap music and hip-hop culture. What purpose do they serve? Isn't it all a bit inward-looking?

Tom, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

I love all those songs, because they're so abstract. And abstraction is so sad/touching/poignant. It's like the person feels so much that they withdraw from the earth and live above it and renounce feeling. It's related to the concept of the cynic as disenchanted idealist. Especially songs like Pop Muzik. Kraftwerk has the same poignant aura, except just as a general feeling, not at a lyrical level. It's like the bands have been withdrawn from the earth by God.

Is that answer hyperbolic enough for you? Really I just wrote so that I could say it is SO COOL how you used the word 'shrill' in your question.

M., Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

My favourite song in this vein is Queen's "More of That Jazz", for sheer contempt for the audience - "Only football gives us thrills, rock'n'roll just pays the bills", then it ends with a medley of all the rest of the songs on the album.

tarden, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

The answer that I submitted SO doesn't relate to Queen!

M., Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Well what about that Queen song called "Stadium Rock Goes Over Big In America Until the Singer Starts Looking Gay But the Band Can Still Clean Up In Brazil" then? Rare B-side.

tarden, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

...which was covered by Def Leppard, as a kind of taunt.

tarden, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"Until the Singer Starts Looking Gay"

Excuse me, this was AFTER they were big in America? As a proud and unapologetic Queen fan since before I could even jazz-solo [= not true, obviously] , I suggest Mr Tarden has a second look at those early LP sleeves. (Tho actually I fancied the drummer most: and how often d'you get to say that. So classic.)

Sorry, Tom: the question is better than the answers are getting.

mark s, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

I suggest that we don't mention 'that band' again - the one named above - because I'm sure the questioner didn't intend this to turn into a thread about that particular band and I feel that there's a risk . . . once certain names are mentioned . . . and a feeling of repulsion arises which also leads to a certain inability to forget the object of disaffection . . .

emily, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

I feel like I like pop about pop, and one reason I think I must like it is that I've written loads of pop about pop myself. But then, maybe that kind of pop about pop is different from the pop about pop that Tom E is after. Maybe there are several different ways in which pop can be about pop?

the pinefox, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

I apologise for the shameless self-promotion but you might find this song relevant:

www.dur.ac.uk/j.w.davey

I feel the better songs about music are ones which relate to some wider problem. Music, after all, is really just a form of communication, and the state of music surely must reflect the people who made it and, more importantly, listen to it. The veneration of 'the album' as historical artefact has obscured this fact a little, putting product over process, but it's still as true as it ever was.

This is why I'm not sure I agree about rap music. Black music historically has been about call-and-response, where ideas are presented to an audience and the acceptance or rejection of these ideas is based on the size of the reaction to them. These ideas are usually limited to the progress or state of the community the speakers are addressing, which IS the hip-hop community as music has traditionally been one of the main methods of presenting new ideas.

This is why rap albums are usually the full length of a CD. I don't believe hip-hop artists are interested in creating the best album ever or a perfectly formed album; their intention is to communicate about as many topics as possible and wait for the response from the people who listen.

This is true for blues, jazz, soul, funk and hip-hop. The only big exception I can think of right now is Motown, which was specifically marketed to whites. Whatever, saying hip-hop is inward-looking suggests that all music should address everyone in the world; I would consider hip-hop's community spirit to be one of its major strengths, even if I'm not really part of that community.

John Davey, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Since "Walk This Way" (which incidentally dewserves discussion in this thread), Rap has been every bit as directed at the white market as Motown ever was. One of the key selling points in this regard has been the mythology of "of-and-for-the-black- community"

mark s, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

That's not quite what I meant; I wasn't talking about black music being appropriated by or directed to the white market, because that's happened with most, if not all, forms of black music. I think it's true that all of the forms I listed originated in a solely black community, but I may be wrong. Motown, however, was a calculated attempt to reach a white audience, as opposed to Stax, for example. Again, that's just the impression that I get; please say if you disagree.

John Davey, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

I do disagree, quite a lot: not least because as soon as "black" music began to be made for records (c.1920), the notion of call and response changed radically (as did the notion of community, actually).

case-studies:

Motown: black management, black artists, based in a big racially mixed (but ghetto-ised) city.

Stax: black artist (mostly), white management (mostly), in a small racially mixed, divided city with v.signif and influential bohemian = unsegregated [kinda with future] local community of musicians and music-lovers.

Def Jam: famously white-and-black management team (Rubin and Simmons), deliberate rock-and-rap rosta (Public Enemy and Slayer) .

mark s, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

"[kinda with future]": I have no idea what this means!! I was on the phone to my bank while making this post. Ignore.

mark s, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

To get back to the original inquiry:

I can't speak confidently on M or XTC, but from the few times I've heard N'Sync's addition to the canon, I'd have to say the song is more about themselves than the state of the industry: those lines before the chorus about the "car I drive or the ice around my neck" not mattering because "it's all about respect". They're not celebrating pop music in and of itself; they're celebrating their contribution to pop music, & how they're going to keep on bringin' the melody to the people. Keeping it real, as it were. In that sense, it's not unlike 99% of hip-hop; in this light, Justin's cut-up beat-boxing @ the end of the track seems appropriate.

The other two songs Tom mentions might be of a poo-pooing nature; again, I can't say for sure. But what I do know is that most songs that attempt to made grand, sweeping statments about the state of (insert topic), like Billy Joel's "We Didn't Start the Fire", make high school poetry sound good. In these cases, ignoring the lyrics is a necessity.

I'm all for musicians kvetching about the state of the music industry, though - Pavement, Superchunk, Lois, Ida & Tsunami (ah, the heyday of early '90's "indie rock") have penned some quality songs that address these topics (in various manners), albeit from the "indie" POV. Even then, though, it reflects on the "pop" life.

And, of course, there's Kurt's own personal admission:

Teenage angst has paid off well; Now I'm bored & old - Self-appointed judges judge More than they have sold...

Change the first two words in the 1st line to "bubblegum", and you could have Justin or Britney chewing on these words in a couple years' time.

David Raposa, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Okay, Mark, I can see that (I was wondering about that [kinda with future] though...); Motown was a bad target. So how do you believe records changed call-and-response? Sorry, that question sounds a bit loaded - I'm not trying to shoot you down, I'm just interested to know what you think. Do you think there's some truth in Tom's suggestions, that hip-hop serves no 'purpose' at this point?

Also, how does 'Walk This Way' qualify? It's not, lyrically, a song which comments about pop music, which was my interpretation of Tom's question, even if it was an important collaboration. Perhaps 'King Of Rock' is more appropriate?

John Davey, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Sorry, this isn't a very illuminating point, but can I just say how much I love it when, in their dissection of all that's been great about their summer, the Beach Boys sing "Every now and then we hear our song".

Remember when you spilt Coke all over your blouse? Oh, how we laughed.

Nick, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Re. "Walk This Way": I suspect Mark meant the crashing-barrier moment in the video 'twixt Run DMC and Aerosmith as a comment on rap and rock meeting / crossing over with each other. But I could be wrong.

Robin Carmody, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

John: I'm gonna do "records changed all and response" on its own thread, cuz I've been plonking comedy topic-wormholes in other people's topics all week, and enuff's enuff. (Ethan: revenge will be yours...)

Robin: "Walk this Way" — no, it's more than that. Look, my line on music (on everything) is that influence is a dud word because ALL RECORDS ARE ALWAYS ABOUT OTHER RECORDS (and poems and paintings and movies). What's interesting is when records are ARGUMENTS with other records: samples are way for this to happen, cover versions another, parodies, sound-alikes... etc etc. (Hey, they call me the Harold Bloom of Billboard...)

OK: WtW is RunDMC saying to Aerosmith (in the lyric, but ALSO IN THE BODY OF THE MUSIC, beats, structure, what gets left out) we heard something in your idea that you didn't hear, and this is how you should actually have done it. Walk this way? NO! Walk THIS Way!! The argument is about the walk, but it's also IN the walk (and not just in the talk). And yes, it's an argument about how pop is, and how it should be. (Or "rock", as they chose to call it.)

Kings of Rock broaches this ground, obviously: but I think they needed 1: to face down a (oops, nearly said "dinosaur") an established canonic Great Beast, and 2: for it to be a somewhat forgotten, sidelined, overlooked, minor Great Beast — Bebe Buell and Liv Tyler notwithstanding — to be renovated and revivified. To prove, in fact, by said semi-miracle, that their newcomer reading of "rock" was truer and better and more powerful. (The relevant technical Bloomian terms being *Kenosis*, *Daemonization* and *Apophrades*, as you will by now have realised.)

mark s, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

You're right, Mark. I was trying to grasp the concept you ultimately came out with, actually. Run DMC as *comment* on how Aerosmith should be doing it.

Robin Carmody, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Hmmm. How often do people hanging out simply relate stories to one another of other times they were hanging out? The 'purpose' is in the whole enchilada. MCs boasting about their skillz -- how do they prove it? Through their boasts. The act is the meaning. So yes, I like self-referential pop of all sorts. In fact, I admire Who's Next for exactly that reason. Pop cannot simply be about itself, but the escapist impulse is precisely to turn completely away from society. Contradiction = tension = interesting things happening.

Sterling Clover, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

To the original question - if I can just take a second to point out the vast looming shadow of VIDEO KILLED THE RADIO STAR.

Kim, Thursday, 31 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

John: "how records changed call and response" will be starring on Cute- Formalism — as it's kind of veered into relevant territory — some time tomorrow.

mark s, Friday, 1 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

nineteen years pass...

I've never heard of this show until now...it just seems awesome and crazy such a thing ever existed, and just fucking surreal to see Morrissey and Phil Lynott competing against each other as game show contestants.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ma_6PezH3aA

birdistheword, Saturday, 27 March 2021 20:34 (five years ago)

Phil Lynott was a light entertainment regular for a while.

everything, Sunday, 28 March 2021 00:08 (five years ago)

Surreal to see Morrissey restraining the urge to say something racist to Phil Lynott

Call of Scampi: Slack Nephrops (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 28 March 2021 00:10 (five years ago)

Surreal to see Morrissey restraining the urge to say something racist to Phil Lynott

LMFAO

birdistheword, Sunday, 28 March 2021 00:19 (five years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.