Genius

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
The word 'genius' is bandied about the music industry too often, I think.

Who, out of all musicians would you give the 'genius' title to?

You can only choose one name..... and give a reason, too.

mine? Kate Bush without a question, for her constant innovation, incredible songwriting skills and general refusal to walk the normal path. And THAT voice, of course....

russ t, Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:40 (twenty-three years ago)

'general refusal to walk the normal path'

You mean, advertising her debut album with her nipples, in 1978?

dave q, Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:43 (twenty-three years ago)

I WISH I was a year older!

Who's a genius? Gza, of course.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Prince

Carey (Carey), Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:48 (twenty-three years ago)

dave q - She didn't do that in Britain - that sleeve was overseas only if you remember correctly. And Mancowitz (sp?) gave her the sheets of those photos minus the nipples (there was a famous story about those shots in Q magazine).

I don't recall reading your contribution to this thread, actually, dave q????? Didn't envisage snipes at people's choices and reasons, really.

russ t, Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Only one? Fine then: Mike Patton.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Geoff Love.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:51 (twenty-three years ago)

I thought this thread was about me. Which is why I checked it out.

Calum Robert, Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:52 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.primusmedia.de/image/cover/front/0/5757103.jpg

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:53 (twenty-three years ago)

...and give a reason, too.

D'oh! Missed that!

Okay, I say Mike Patton 'cause he's an absurdly versatile and powerful vocalist and all-around musician, he's composed some of the sickest amazing modern music, and he's involved in more and a wider variety of projects than you can shake a stick at: from the Loveage thing to Mr. Bungle (I refuse to believe they've broken up!) to Fantomas to Tomahawk to his eery solo work to his work with John Zorn, not to mention his own record label Ipecac puts out some amazing other artists, the Melvins among many others. And yes he also used to be in Faith No More, but having released as many albums in the past 2 years in his various projects as they did over their entire career together, I think we can consider that distant past.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 13 March 2003 13:58 (twenty-three years ago)

James Brown - for keeping that much hair to this day, and thats splits thing of course

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 13 March 2003 14:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay russ - Chuck Berry. Innovation being merging text/texture, ie songs about future comb. with music of future. Everything on a mechanical chassis, right? Taking blues out of the 'folk' paradigm and making it current, but inverting country music verities by use of geographic/sociocultural singularities as extrapolation pts (big bang theory) rather than as taken-for-granted endlessly exploitable source materials (steady state theory). And having a reason for it too, ie 'the future belongs to those who have the most interest in changing the present'. (Evil twin Jerry Lee Lewis responds w/ "There is no future, only an eternal present and that belongs to those who can tap into said present's undercurrents"). Berry defeats Lewis tho when the Orig. Rock Gen. undergoes their great trials. Holly (whose relationship to Penniman = Berry/Lewis rel. ['cept on the 'sex' access not the ('race/culture')/('past'/future') axis) dies, easy way out. Presley eaten by the society he encapsulates and thus is one and the same w/ that society forever. Lewis & Berry brought down by morals incidents. (If the judge in the Mann Act case paid close attention to the words of "Rock and Roll Music" or God forbid "Sweet Little Rock & Roller" ["KKK Bitch" x 'Village of the Damned'] he would've got the fuckin' chair.) Lewis destroyed by being reabsorbed into showbiz continuum ('no gig too small!') that they meant to abolish in first place. Berry survives. Comes out vectorin' even more motorvated. (Everyone in world - "Rock doesn't automatically die upon adversity = it hasn't drowned, definitely a witch. Hail Satan, here we come.")
So we all know "Come On" is basis of Stones' entire career etc., but this fucker is beyond everyone by now, taillights in the distance like Maybelline. Berry formula travels to Detroit where the city's burnin', sound makes connection auto assembly/social disassembly, those diads pass thru Iggy's kidneys and are subsequently drunk by D Bowie & his children. Berry formula travels to the South where James Brown takes that ol' Ford (rhymes with 'road') and builds airplanes and rockets and missiles out of them, but the ineffable and awe-inspiring and civilisation-levelling scale of Brown's achievement should maybe be left for somebody else to elucidate. Berry formula travels to New Orleans, city of syncretism where the meanings of everything are gracefully put to one side because everybody talks funny and carries guns so safer to just collect and pile weird sounds from anywhere on top of that chassis, the weirder and more exotic the better and if you don't fuckin' believe me listen to Johny Allen's cover of "Promised Land" next to any new-wave shit and tell me that all the arty ppl were trying to make their gtrs and synths approximate that fuckin' accordion. You know, diatonic so you get weird-ass notes without even trying, and that wheezing, thick, sometimes-sustaining and sometimes-clipping sound, you don't think Devo found "Working in a Coal Mine" by accident do you? Berry formula goes out west where B Wilson finds it and decides to use it in his quest to annihilate the self by exalting the other, thus creating the idea of 'pop' music as we know it, forget all the music-hall/Tin Pan Alley shit because we all know that widespread recordings of stuff changed everything. (B Wilson on opposite coast/pole to B Dylan who was attempting to negate difference between Self and Other through surprisingly old-fashioned US transcendentalism, ie "If I do x it's significant just because I did it" etc but that's a whole other fuckin' thing).
Now having invented all the other shit (prog? Berry via Beatles [M.O. - singlemindedness of artistic vision, ie he wouldn't just play any old shit like B Diddley or E Presley, it had to be 'Chuck Berry music' so every release by him is an event,>Beatles>Floyd etc>Radiohead]), what's he do? Watches the sixties and with a kind benediction ["You guys are gettin' it together"] allows the whole Brit thing to happen. Something a bit mindless about it, though. Rolling Stones just come up with a new version of "Come On" every week, garage bands copy the Rolling Stones every day, so on and so forth. All good. We need a revolution.
The final hit of Berry's career is an endless, excruciating loogie of contempt hurled at the audience. I don't think he really hated them - who could 'hate an audience'? They're all indiovidual ppl, you can't generalise. (Advice I always follow, I must say.) You can needle them a bit though. "My Ding-a-Ling" has been extensively chronicled elsewhere as the most baffling-bordering-on-disturbing shit bomb ever hidden in a fire extinguisher. Why do ppl go to shows to be insulted, abused, snickered at, sometimes physically assaulted? What kind of fuckin' ppl do that? *I* do, a lot. I suspect alot of you do as well. Mortification? Curiosity? Genuine investigation into subjective flaws in previously-developed hypothesis re performer-audience relationship? Who cares? A lot of you like punk, or 'Metal Machine Music' or GG Allin or something. Who I saw once, but I'll tell you about it later maybe. Some of you who are REALLY sick even liked 'Celebrity Skin'. So that's the mystery of transgressive pop solved then. Among everything else. So C Berry, there's your genius. That a better answer?

dave q, Thursday, 13 March 2003 14:32 (twenty-three years ago)


Well, certainly *NOT* fuckin' Michael Jackson.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 13 March 2003 14:58 (twenty-three years ago)

the problem with giving someone the title 'genius' is that i feel i have to give reasons other than the beauty and overall excellence of the music coming out of the speakers. hence i try and avoid it.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Thursday, 13 March 2003 15:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Everytime I think of a likely candidate, I come across some impediment. For example, I was going to cite producer Bob Ezrin, notably for albums like Destroyer, Berlin, Billion Dollar Babies and The Wall. But....he's also responsible for....

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000001ELP.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 13 March 2003 15:31 (twenty-three years ago)

dave q - bloody hell! Reason enough I reckon!

russ t, Thursday, 13 March 2003 15:33 (twenty-three years ago)

my criteria for genius suggestions:

does something very impressive at a very young age that people only expect adults to do (e.g. Mozart)

creates something (most likely fusion of existing material) that becomes a clear influence and inspires a large amount of people to try and imitate or incorporate in their own work, but doesnt really come close to the creator

creates something that solves a long-running problem or fulfils a niche that has been empty for long time...and does this in a profound way

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 13 March 2003 15:38 (twenty-three years ago)

obviously you dont have to have done ALL of those things to be classed a 'genius' - is a 'prodigy' just the term for a genius child or is there a difference? was Mozart a genius or merely a prodigy?

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 13 March 2003 15:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Stevem's criteria = "Little" Stevie Wonder 100%

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 13 March 2003 15:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Who is the William James Sidis of music?

oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 March 2003 16:38 (twenty-three years ago)


I love Randy Newman, he's very skilful, and he evokes certain things--the "spirit of" whatever, place, time, etc.--that is the orig. meaning of "genius." But a genius? What do it mean anyway? The power to evoke, seemingly effortlessly, emotions, or to elicit responses, that aren't rational, explainable? I think that's what it comes down to and so there are a lot of geniuses in popular music. Chuck Berry evokes riding in a car in 1957 quite well, but beyond that, is it really "genius" or just a nice re-working of Chess blues and so forth? Randy Newman evokes an imaginary Los Angeles of 1970 in "12 Songs," Brian Wilson an imaginary California in his 1963-1967 work...has there even been a supremely synthetic, all-encompassing talent who ties all the strands of pop music together in one place? I'd be hard pressed to say yes to that. I mean, I like all the people I mention here...

Brian Wilson? Todd Rundgren? Alex Chilton? Prince? Kate Bush? PJ Harvey? Lee Hazlewood? Phil Spector?


Jess Hill (jesshill), Thursday, 13 March 2003 16:40 (twenty-three years ago)

having a tough time picking between Eno and Beefheart.
Eno = pretty much the ultimate "art" rocker in the 70s. merging art theory with music. incorprating chance into compositions etc... through his oblique strategies cards. and even though he's not really done anything of note for 20 years himself he's still added a lot to other bands (even if it was u2 and james... accusations of not being able to shine shit accepted). an example of his powers are the difference between the triptych of talking heads records he produced and their material outside that period. the track drugs is almost reason enough to include him as a genius.

Beefheart = less academic, more instinctual but he basically changed the face of rock music. and definitely pushed the industry to it's limits in the 60s. his knack for arrangements of songs is pretty much unrivalled. if you listen to an album like doc at the radar station the intertwining guitar parts are insanely complex but work beautifully.

yeah, both very different approaches to music but both equally worthy of inclusion.

simon 803 (simon 803), Thursday, 13 March 2003 16:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Obviously not Ray Charles...


Anyway, there are several, but Paul McCartney and Tony Banks deserve it more than most.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 13 March 2003 16:53 (twenty-three years ago)

i'd take ray charles over mccartney any freakin' day of the week.

Bosse-De-Nage (Bosse-De-Nage), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Alex: Did you ever see the Kiss Behind the Music? There's this part where Gene (I think) is talking about Music From the Elder and he tries to pin all the blame on Bob, like Kiss had no part in deciding to make an album like that, much less recording it. Jerks!

original bgm, Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:02 (twenty-three years ago)

geir's use of 'obviously' is his most blatant appeal for attention yet

Neudonym, Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Bob Ezrin was interviewed that album at one point, and said something to the effect of: "I was doing lots, and lots, and lots of cocaine at the time." Which, I suppose, explains a lot.

Gene is pretty upfront about how misdirected that album was, but falls short of actually admitting it was an ass-backwards fiasco.

I should note, however, that I do own the album.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Is it as funny as you would think from just looking at that cover?

original bgm, Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:08 (twenty-three years ago)

The couple of songs I heard were just sad, really...

original bgm, Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:08 (twenty-three years ago)

It's as tragic as you might think. Hoary, overblown, self-important, aspiring to be something so many leagues above it that it must be suffering from the bends.

"I" is entertaining, I suppose, with a decent hook -- but the lyrics are pretty insufferable in a cringe-worthy "Let's Hear it For Sobriety" sorta way.

Also, "World Without Heroes" makes me gag....I don't care if Lou Reed helped in its conception. He, they -- and, verily, WE ALL -- should be ashamed. To think that this was the same band that came up with "Deuce"!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 13 March 2003 17:11 (twenty-three years ago)

The word is overused, and there aren't that many in rock and roll (which is one of the things I like about it). Brian Wilson, maybe?
Definitely geniuses: Louis Armstrong, Art Tatum, Charlie Parker.

Jazzbo (jmcgaw), Thursday, 13 March 2003 19:54 (twenty-three years ago)

I second all of Jazzbo's picks and add Thelonious Monk and my man Mozart.

oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 March 2003 20:03 (twenty-three years ago)

If there's a definition for the word "genius" as-applies-to-music that Frank Zappa doesn't fit, there is something very wrong.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 13 March 2003 20:08 (twenty-three years ago)

in rock music:
mark hollis
eno
charles hayward
holger czukay
wire

j fail (cenotaph), Thursday, 13 March 2003 20:17 (twenty-three years ago)

"i want dual carburetors and two straight exhausts"

i.e. 5.0 liter 20-inch rims etc! true true. the full roll-away bed in the back seat sadly is still yet to be innovated.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 13 March 2003 21:25 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd say Prince, certainly.

I mean I was actually thinking about this just last week, after that "What were the synths used on Thriller" or whatever thread. Someone mentioned how on "Kiss" Prince had used the sound of an acoustic guitar and then repeatedly gated it (yeah, yeah, some producer term) to get that really clipped synthetic sound that runs throughout the verses. I had never thought about it too much and this prompted me to go back and listen to the Parade lp. It's a record I always liked, but this was a weird listening experience; it was like I was listening to the record with fresh ears. Really trying to pick apart the interesting things he was doing as a producer/arranger.

I mean, it is an unfortunately overused word that has lost much (if not all) impact as an effective descriptor, but i'd say it certainly applies to Prince. His ability to seemingly just pick impossibly catchy songs out of air, for one. The way he can flit from minimal to baroque, usually on the same record. Something like "When Doves Cry", how alien and exciting that song sounded when it first came out. It's amazing the stuff he was able to get onto pop radio. Something like that Parade lp, recorded at the peak of his popularity; what a strange record! That opening quartet of songs - "Christopher Tracy's Parade" - "New Positions" - "I Wonder U" - "Under the Cherry Moon" - it slays me. The 12 cd people that drove this thing up to #3 on the charts on the basis of "Kiss" - what did they think? The fact that he did all this while doing movies (admittedly bad) and producing a ton of other good records.

So yeah, he's one. There are others.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 13 March 2003 21:37 (twenty-three years ago)

I should note, however, that I do own the album.

Me too... picked it up for three bucks in Jersey a few years ago. "Dark Light" is actually pretty awesome (sing the following in a self-important Lawng Island accent):

Look out, 'cause there's something wrong
And you don't know what it is
Watch out, or it's Sodom and Gommorah
The malevolent order
Right now, before it's much too late
Before it's much too late

[Chorus]
A dark light
A darkness never ending
A dark light
The devil gets his due
A dark night
Is everywhere descending
A dark light
Is coming for you

Now look up, well the skies are black
And they're getting darker all the time
Watch out, for the things that you believe in
You're gonna be attacked and you won't know what it is
Wise up, you better watch your step
You better watch your step
[Chorus]
A dark light
A darkness never ending
A dark light
Of perversion and hate
A dark night
Is everywhere descending
A dark light
There's no time to wait

[Solo]

Look out, for the death of love
There will be no more love
Watch out, it's yourself that you are fooling
Who do you think you're fooling?
Shout it out, it's a terrible thing
Such a terrible thing

[Chorus]
A dark light
A darkness never ending
A dark light
The sun is turning cool
A dark night
Is everywhere descending
A dark light
Is shining at you
Dark light

Dark light

Is shining at you
Dark light

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 13 March 2003 21:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Robert Fripp.
Reasons? Guitar Craft (he sincerely wants people to do well at the things they care about - very cool). The "Baby's On Fire" solo. The opening of "Lark's Tongues in Aspic, Part III". Too many other things to mention.

Bryan (Bryan), Thursday, 13 March 2003 21:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Mr. Diamond, you forgot to mention the songs he wrote for others (Manic Monday, Nothing Compares 2U) and the fact that he is proficient at playing every instrument known to man.

oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 March 2003 21:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah I think Fripp and Eno on Here Come the Warm Jets were tapped into a higher plane.

I was wondering about this, can anyone think of a song earlier than "Paw-Paw Negro Blowtorch" with a riff built entirely on guitar harmonics?

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 13 March 2003 21:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Oops- well I did throw in that note about producing others but yeah, you're totally right. In fact I'd forgotten about "Manic Monday". Sheesh was he on fire or what.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 13 March 2003 21:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Prince, obviously; James Brown, absolutely; Al Green, yeah probably. I think Neil Young, too, probably. "Genius" has always signified to me someone with an overabundance of preternatural inspiration--someone who can pick things out of the air and make them flesh. All three of my pix are craftsmen, too, but you they also create(d) great work very much on the fly, as well as honing things to perfection.

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 13 March 2003 22:05 (twenty-three years ago)

geir's use of 'obviously' is his most blatant appeal for attention yet
Lets not indulge it.

I'm tempted to give the cliché answer of Bob Dylan, but that would be redundant.
So I'm going for the dark horse: Richard Thompson.
Reasons:
1) This guys bizarre tunings can make a guitar mimic numerous folkoid instruments: Dobro, Mandolin, Accordian, Zamfir-style friggin' Pan-pipes fercryinoutloud.
2) His lyrics are sometimes as good as Dylan, and generally easier to follow.
3) His singing voice is loads better than Dylan's.
4) As a Sufi, he one of the few cool Muslims in the world.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Friday, 14 March 2003 00:24 (twenty-three years ago)

his singing voice may be easier on the ears than Dylan's, but Thompson is a pretty leaden phraser (I do think he's brilliant, obv, and yeah I realized after my last post I'd forgotten Dylan and then realized it was OK)

M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 14 March 2003 00:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay, his voice is an acquired taste, but don't you think his idiosyncratic guitar work is the most fun you can have without getting undressed?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Friday, 14 March 2003 00:36 (twenty-three years ago)

4) As a Sufi, he one of the few cool Muslims in the world.

behave!

stevem (blueski), Friday, 14 March 2003 00:38 (twenty-three years ago)

But he *is* cool. Sufi's are kinda like the Islamic equivalent of the flaky Wiccan chic that sells herb tea and crystals at the flea market. I LIKE that. I wish the Sufi's would kick the Wahhabi'ists and Shi'ites and Sunnis in their nads and take over!
ITS OFFICIAL! THE SUFI JIHAD STARTS HERE!

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Friday, 14 March 2003 00:41 (twenty-three years ago)

I didn't say his voice was an acquired taste! I said it was, in pure tonality, "better" in many ways than Dylan's, whose voice is an acquired taste. But Dylan is a really smart phraser and Thompson isn't.

M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 14 March 2003 00:52 (twenty-three years ago)

Nick S: you can't spell.

gaz (gaz), Friday, 14 March 2003 01:27 (twenty-three years ago)

oh yes and Hendrix duh

M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 14 March 2003 01:28 (twenty-three years ago)

David Bowie - Mainly because of his amount of different styles and sounds covered, and a consistant ablity to write songs that fit him perfectly. From listening to his entire discography I think it's pretty clear how much of a genius he is. Even his supposed worst albums have some amazing songs on them.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 14 March 2003 01:47 (twenty-three years ago)

GENIUS:

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000002NIQ.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Evan (Evan), Friday, 14 March 2003 01:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Anybody that ever tells you there's anything more innovative and groundbreaking than that is lying.

Evan (Evan), Friday, 14 March 2003 01:55 (twenty-three years ago)

http://image.allmusic.com/00/amg/cov200/drf100/f171/f17198wbhar.jpg

Those sideburns are pure genius.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 14 March 2003 02:10 (twenty-three years ago)

GZA

duh.

Andrzej B. (Andrzej B.), Friday, 14 March 2003 04:16 (twenty-three years ago)

After reading this thread agin, I guess I'd pick, out of the people nominated here, Charlie Parker. I love Randy Newman and Brian Wilson, and Prince, but I just don't think they got to the heart of the matter like Parker did.

As usual, Dave Q. comes through!!

Jess Hill (jesshill), Friday, 14 March 2003 14:39 (twenty-three years ago)

It seems like there are a bunch of jazz geniuses.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 14 March 2003 15:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Parker *did* single-handedly invent a whole new way to elaborate on musical ideas. (I don't think elaborate makes sense there but I can't think of another word)

oops (Oops), Friday, 14 March 2003 15:59 (twenty-three years ago)

It seems like there are a bunch of jazz geniuses.

Yet not one of them mentioned on here so far are Rahsaan Roland Kirk, who, among other things, created the "stritch" and "manzello" by altering a couple saxophones based on a dream, played as many as 3 horns at once, circular breathed until his neck looked like a bellows, dropped nose flute solos whilst yelling 'take it away nose!', was an astonishingly lyrical flautist, played a mean trumpet, and was one of the most ferocious tenor sax men of his era. Plus he was an amazing composer, incorporating elements of European classical music such as fugues, latin and funk rhythms, and had a vast control of the history of jazz itself. All this while being blind as a bat. THAT man was an amazing sick genius.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 14 March 2003 16:00 (twenty-three years ago)

*hangs head in shame after reading above post*

oops (Oops), Friday, 14 March 2003 16:07 (twenty-three years ago)

No biggie oops, really. He's also definitely one of the most overlooked geniuses (genii?) of jazz as well.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 14 March 2003 17:21 (twenty-three years ago)

I've heard about him, but never *heard* him. What do you recommend as an intro?

oops (Oops), Friday, 14 March 2003 17:23 (twenty-three years ago)

Rip, Rig and Panic.

Jess Hill (jesshill), Friday, 14 March 2003 17:25 (twenty-three years ago)

Rahsaan Roland Kirk - definitely... unfortunately, he was written off as a novelty act because of his ability to play 3 horns at once & the way he rearranged well-known songs.

But if we're talking rocker here - I'm gwan go with Richie Thompson.

(Other names mentioned also worthy.)

I love the word "Bandied". You never hear people use the present/future tense of it though.. "I'm going to bandy Richard Thompson's name in conversation the next time someone mentions "genious.")

dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 14 March 2003 17:35 (twenty-three years ago)

You could bandy, or go one step further and bruit.

I have seen Richard T. a few times. He's one amazing guitarist and tolerated me and my friends drunkenly calling out requests, some of which he played, at a club a few years back. He was very good. I don't much like what he does, though--I respect it but it's just too fucking dour for me, although I'm aware he has a nice dry sense of humor. The only ones I care for are "Henry the Human Fly" and his great collab. w/ John French, Kaiser, Frith.

Jess Hill (jesshill), Friday, 14 March 2003 17:40 (twenty-three years ago)

What do you recommend as an intro?

I'll say the songs "Inflated Tear", "Volunteered Slavery", and "One Ton" make a very good intro triumvirate, having good examples of his distinct delivery techniques and composition style, as well as his very charming-yet-not-musically-off-putting sense of humor.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 14 March 2003 18:08 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.