Jimi Hendrix - just a tad overrated ?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
perhaps just a tad.

JP Albin (John Paul Albin), Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:25 (twenty-three years ago)

nope.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:33 (twenty-three years ago)

The Beatles, just a tad overrated? Perhaps just a tad.

Miles Davis, just a tad overrated? Perhaps just a tad.

Frank Zappa, just a tad overrated? Perhaps just a tad.

Gershwin, Mingus, Cage, Parker, Coltrane, etc, etc, etc just a tad overrated? Perhaps just a tad.

The nickalicious answer: Why heavens NO my dear man!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:33 (twenty-three years ago)

didn't think anyone would agree. that just wouldn't be politically correct these days.

JP Albin (John Paul Albin), Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Politically correct shmolitically correct; forget about the supposed guitar "innovations" and all that: JIMI WROTE AMAZING SONGS. "Crosstown Traffic", "Manic Depression", "Castles Made of Sand", "Dolly Dagger", "1983 (A Merman I Shall Be)", "Land of the New Rising Sun", dude denying Jimi-the-songwriter = denying the "progression of music", IMHMFnO.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:39 (twenty-three years ago)

SUPPOSED guitar innovations is right. I would love to see jimi and eddie van halen battle it out. don't say jimi taught eddie what he knows cos he really didn't.

JP Albin (John Paul Albin), Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Not to mention his beautiful organic juxtaposition of improv-based-in-blues/jazz with loud-ass-rock-dynamics-&-instrumentation, which he managed to beat folks credited with the creation of "fusion" to (such as Miles Davis & Tony Williams & Herbie Hancock etc).

don't say jimi taught eddie what he knows cos he really didn't.

True. Eddie Van Halen ripped his shit straight from Chet Atkins (finger-pickin stuff) and Steven Hackett (two-handed tapping stuff). He has said so himself MANY A TIME.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Jimi the songwriter is actually the man I have the most problem with. I'll give you "Castles Made of Sand," but his LSD lyrics hurt many songs, and date badly. Jimi the guitarist is the one I love.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:44 (twenty-three years ago)

and jimi created all his own techniques. foolishness.

JP Albin (John Paul Albin), Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Also not-to-mention his amazing comination of futurism-&-sci-fi-fantasy in his lyrics, as well as his "okay, so it's not Freddie Mercury, but it still sounds PERFECT for this style" voice, followed by his "other than Noel Redding, everyone I've ever played with is like totally psychic to what I'm doing and can follow me ANYWHERE" band-chemistry.

Dude, Kenan, I love you. And JP, contrary to what you may believe, I love you too. But Jimi-the-songwriter = DA POOH.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:46 (twenty-three years ago)

(BTW, if you didn't know, Oh my god; the nickalicious is totally trashed. .)

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:46 (twenty-three years ago)

i'm gonna start strumming the guitar with my penis. i will get so popular. people will adore me for that. i will have the biggest fanbase cos i'm such an innovator.

JP Albin (John Paul Albin), Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:49 (twenty-three years ago)

I mean, he totally changed the game. He invented heavy metal basically. Think about the balls it took to be a black guy making a record like Are You Experienced. Listen to "Third Stone From the Sun". I mean just his control of sustain and feedback was techno-erotic perfection. Picking up these newfangled things like wah-wah's and fuzzboxes and coaxing these otherworldly sounds was one thing, but he could play better than any other player. He was constantly seeking new ideas, reaching, always looking forward throughout his short time. Built his own studio, and basically LIVED there. Playing with other people, playing with white rockers, black jazzers, rethinking his music, bringing sexuality and tender humanity to everything he did.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:50 (twenty-three years ago)

tonight i was just listening to "rainy day dream away" and "bold as love" both really beautiful songs. almost weepingly beautiful. he was really sloppy sometimes.

chaki (chaki), Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:51 (twenty-three years ago)

omg cant forget machine gun

chaki (chaki), Thursday, 20 March 2003 07:51 (twenty-three years ago)

totally fucking impossible

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay, much as I wish JP would either fuck off or figure out that asking people questions works better when you're at all interested in their responses, he is right here.

The biggest problem with Hendrix is that he's just an awful singer -- sure, he has a great voice, but even with this massively cool-sounding voice the most he can muster is to occasionally distract you from the fact that he has no ability whatsoever as a vocalist. It's not so terrible on the upbeat numbers, which are essentially just rock-and-talk instrumentals with some hyping chatter on them, but in the slower bits it's just painful, the same ostensibly-serious drawl but with the intonation and phrasing of one of those guys who reads books onto plastic records for kids to look along with. I mean, "Castles made of Sand," I almost expect to hear

so the Indian boy [BEEP] turn the page, alright

and I just can't take it. That's the other thing, I have this irrational aversion to how he calls out every solo and change like some sort of tour guide, which just reinforces the fact that -- from today's perspective -- half of his work is just flat-out mugging for the camera.

Okay but so THAT SAID it's not his fault. Much as I hate to forgive the sixties for really unforgivable levels of wank in all directions, it's flatly obvious that it was pretty impressive and compelling at the time, and it's just the over-compelling effect it's had on like way to much of everyone since that's run it to the point of senselessness, picking up exactly the worst mugging of guys like Hendrix and turning it into the uber-mugging. The problem is that, you know, the same thing could be said of boys having long hair, and at some point we were all able to just fucking move on and not go around valorizing the long hair of boys in the sixties, even if it was really impressive back then and it was latter-day mullet-head who took the steam out of it. Whereas with Hendrix people keep pretending that there's something deep and meaningful in his stuff that's completely absent from the work of the clerk at the guitar store. And there probably is, but not that much, and anyway standing in today's shoes does it even matter?

I dunno, if you can still see this stuff straight enough to tell me -- in the author-is-dead just-look-at-the-product sort of way -- that there's something I should be getting out of Hendrix and not out of Troy at Guitar Center, well then good on you for catching it. But as far as I can tell Hendrix stuff either needs to be buried in a time capsule for half a century until we can actually deal with it again, or we need to put some fucking distance in there ourselves, either by hating it or ironizing it or playing with it or something.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry to get all vehement there, those might not even be good reasons for feeling the way I do but all I know is that every time I hear the beginning of "Hey Joe" I want to either roll my eyes until they fall out or throw up on something. I wish I could muster more coherent reasons for it but I have never, ever been able to find whatever worthwhile content is supposedly buried in this guy's stuff except for once while really really stoned I sort of enjoyed a few of the guitar textures.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:10 (twenty-three years ago)

i am interested in what everyone has to say. ya fuck.
kirk hammett never has and never will receive as much credit as jimi has received. even though theyre both talented, since jimi was around in the 60's and kirk is alive and kicking today, it means that he just plain ol' sucks. which really makes no sense to me. fuck this whole classic-is-superior mentality when it comes to who innovated what.

JP Albin (John Paul Albin), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:11 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah I don't think it would be possible to make me any less proud to agree with you on this one.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Nabisco, it's been a rough night, but c'mon

The biggest problem with Hendrix is that he's just an awful singer -- sure, he has a great voice, but even with this massively cool-sounding voice the most he can muster is to occasionally distract you from the fact that he has no ability whatsoever as a vocalist.

I've read too many of your posts and respect you too much that you honestly find this such an issue.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:19 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm sure it probably has more to do with the Guitar Center phenomenon, but I mean, you can't blame him for a bunch of lame-o copyists.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:21 (twenty-three years ago)

No, I'm sorry, Diamond, I won't claim to have any grand well-reasoned explanation for it but the way he sings makes me want to kill myself. Granted, I shouldn't say "he has no ability whatsoever" like it's some universal truth, but whatever ability there is is completely unavailable to my ears.

Anyway also I understand on an intellectual level that there was this massive amount of creation and invention going on in Hendrix's stuff but when I put it on I just don't hear it -- it's on the books but I can't seem to find it there in the music itself.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:22 (twenty-three years ago)

i think you have to be really high to hear it. that's why he got so popular. all his hardcore fans sold dope to each other.

JP Albin (John Paul Albin), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:29 (twenty-three years ago)

[rolls eyes]

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:32 (twenty-three years ago)

I am really high quite a lot and I've got nothing here.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:34 (twenty-three years ago)

must have been something they laced it with back then.

JP Albin (John Paul Albin), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:35 (twenty-three years ago)

he's a beautiful singer. I love his lyrics bcz they are so nonsensical. but its the pyrothenics on 'electric ladyland' that win the day. oh baby...

there's a intellectual level to understanding this (you could prob apply musicological args to almost anything but i don't play that game yet) and then there isn't, really

(I'm ans to some of nabisco's points not the retarded fuck who started this thread)

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:38 (twenty-three years ago)

''Much as I hate to forgive the sixties for really unforgivable levels of wank in all directions''

there's wank to every decade (I want dan perry to wake up)

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:39 (twenty-three years ago)

do not feed the tad troll.

yawn, Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:40 (twenty-three years ago)

The guy took the word 'Experiance'(drugs) and Put it into Music using his Teeth and fingers on a guitar!
Taking drugs while listening to his tracks is a wast of drugs, the music itself is the 'Experiance' wich gets ya high. futuristic psycadelia.

rex jr., Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:41 (twenty-three years ago)

I have never disagreed so violently with a Nabisco post in my life, and I will leave it at that.

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:41 (twenty-three years ago)

It's just like, he had tons of imagination, he took what was available to him at the time in terms of technology, and was just fearless about it.

He had a sense of humor and a tender side and a sexual side and could write 3 minute pop songs and perform 10 minute abstract improvisation.

I mean here's a guy who wrote and sang "The Wind Cries Mary" and did that version of "Star Spangled Banner", and we have to argue if he's any good? The rock hating is getting tiresome.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:42 (twenty-three years ago)

I mean if he was alive in the 80's he would have been Derrick May or something.

Probably half the music I like has "bad" vocals.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Derrick May is lucky if he's 1/15th as brilliant as Hendrix.

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, I don't disagree, but I wz just trying to draw in the technology angle.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:47 (twenty-three years ago)

I wannna have mr. Diamond's babies!

''Probably half the music I like has "bad" vocals.''

that's right. I've had this out on the doors thread and the Pil thread.

after punk this args abt vocals are really useless (I'm not saying 'anything goes' but the threshold for 'bad' vocals has increased).


Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:48 (twenty-three years ago)

And i can't imagin Hendrix tracks with a different voice, his will to not try to sing too hard is a magor part of creating the modern Post John Lee Hooker 'street wise' atmosphere Many have used since. its perfect.

rex jr., Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:51 (twenty-three years ago)

(I'm sorry Matos. I now seriously regret taking a strident tone and not a personal one, because the fact is that I just don't like Hendrix and shouldn't even pretend to have any good reasons why. It's a gut thing. If anyone has a second could they try and explain what I should be getting out of it? Like, less in a "why he's good" way and more in a "if you listen for these elements maybe you will begin to appreciate him" kind of way?)

(NB my problem with his vocals isn't that he's a "bad" singer but that the vocals themselves just don't seem to do very much.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:52 (twenty-three years ago)

(Oh and, like, a question: all of his major contributions and creations and inventions -- should I be hearing some evidence of them on the records? Usually when someone's doing something pathbreaking I can sense them taking some sort of joy in it on the record, the invention is sort of affecting me whether I'm intellectually aware of it or not. With Hendrix I don't feel that. Should I?)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:55 (twenty-three years ago)

I mean, Matos is right, May is a bad example; anytime you try to make these chronoligical comparisons it's troublesome. Probably bomb squad or something is more apt.

I don't know, who can say how much Hendrix lay up nights worrying about being a black man in a white man's world? He certainly always seemed like a phlegmatic fellow. But that whole Band of Gypsies thing. Total disengagement move. The guy just followed his muse and did not care. We are able to reap the benefits.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:56 (twenty-three years ago)

I know, Mr. D. I think a closer analogue would be Prince, though, as much for the tech angle (oh those drum machine programs!) as anything else

Nabisco, you don't need to apologize! My reasons for liking Hendrix are pretty much the same reasons everyone else has--my viewpoint on this is very close to the consensus viewpoint, so I don't think I'm the person to convince you about this. or maybe tonight's not the night for me to, since I'm doing some other writing right now and want to concentrate my energies on it somewhat (yeah yr doing GREAT by posting this Matos)

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:56 (twenty-three years ago)

(I crossed posts w/Diamond because I added the Nabisco reply after seeing it when I tried to post it first, argh)

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:57 (twenty-three years ago)

That is to say Band of Gypsies might be my favorite record, to avoid confusion.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:57 (twenty-three years ago)

I will say, though, that Greg Tate's new Hendrix book, set to come out in June I think, is as cogent and entertaining an argument as I've read about Hendrix's music, and is highly recommended; its centrally about Hendrix's role in black music and black America, two very under-discussed subjects.

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 20 March 2003 08:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Though I don't feel as strongly, I agree with biscuit that
the main problem with hendrix is his voice.
It took me a long time to get over how lackluster
it was and hear how great the songs are.
Imagine how great he could have been with a proper
singer - besides, then he could have focused entirely on the
pickin.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Thursday, 20 March 2003 09:00 (twenty-three years ago)

whatever.. his voice is perfect

chaki (chaki), Thursday, 20 March 2003 09:01 (twenty-three years ago)

omg what a horrible spelling by rex jr. sorry to everyone who is botherd by it ;-)

rex jr., Thursday, 20 March 2003 09:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Wow! Had never heard Tate was doing Hendrix (certainly a figure w/ no shortage of devoted writing). Will keep eyes peeled.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 March 2003 09:03 (twenty-three years ago)

y'all hendrix haters are fucked up.

to come dangerously close to sounding like a hippie, not many people have played music that seemed like such a natural, flowing extension of themselves. and his voice rulzxorxed, dammit.

your null fame (yournullfame), Thursday, 20 March 2003 09:16 (twenty-three years ago)

^ haha otm

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 3 March 2007 03:04 (nineteen years ago)

Which maybe is a point against rather than for

Hurting 2, Saturday, 3 March 2007 03:10 (nineteen years ago)

It's a b10 chord, yes?

Tim Ellison, Saturday, 3 March 2007 03:43 (nineteen years ago)

E7#9

To my knowledge there's no such thing as a "B10" chord!

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 3 March 2007 03:45 (nineteen years ago)

Oh okay, sharp nine. I didn't realize that's why the pound sign was being used there! Yeah, you're probably right that people call it a sharp nine chord. I think of the note as a flat third, though!

Tim Ellison, Saturday, 3 March 2007 03:48 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, when you're talking about that note as being a blues inflection, isn't it always called a flat third?

Tim Ellison, Saturday, 3 March 2007 03:49 (nineteen years ago)

The third is already "taken" by the G#.

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 3 March 2007 03:54 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah.

Tim Ellison, Saturday, 3 March 2007 03:56 (nineteen years ago)

Do you guys like the [i]Cry of Love[/i} stuff?

Tim Ellison, Saturday, 3 March 2007 03:58 (nineteen years ago)

trying to refer to The Cry of Love album by Jimi Hendrix there - the posthumous album presumably containing tracks from what would have been the fourth album

Tim Ellison, Saturday, 3 March 2007 03:59 (nineteen years ago)

"flat 3rd" isn't a very useful term -- basically you either have a minor third or a major third. The dom7 chord is a major third with a minor (flatted, if you want) 7. The E7#9 chord is a dom7 with the 9th raised. It would sound pretty different if you made the third minor and then had the 10th. I hope that came out right - I'm fucking drunk.

Yeah man, I like Cry Of Love

Hurting 2, Saturday, 3 March 2007 04:15 (nineteen years ago)

Can one still by Cry of Love as Cry of Love or have they since repackaged all that material under a different name like THIRD STONE FROM MITCH MITCHELL'S WIG AND STRAIGHT ON TIL LADYLAND or something.

Hurting 2, Saturday, 3 March 2007 04:42 (nineteen years ago)

Here's my point: "Louie Louie" is in A major. If someone were to transcribe the guitar solo, they sure as hell are not going to call THE FLAT THIRD in there B sharp! They will call it C even though the electric piano player is playing C# at the same time.

Tim Ellison, Saturday, 3 March 2007 04:48 (nineteen years ago)

Only a mentalist would call it freaking B sharp!

Tim Ellison, Saturday, 3 March 2007 04:53 (nineteen years ago)

I think most people would still call the note G (and not F double sharp) but the chord is definitely called Eaug9 or E#9 or E7#9.

Sundar, Saturday, 3 March 2007 05:06 (nineteen years ago)

Cry of Love is a bit inconsistent IIRC but like I said, I think "Drifting" is one of the greatest things he ever did. "Ezy Rider" and "Freedom" are really good too.

Sundar, Saturday, 3 March 2007 05:07 (nineteen years ago)

I kind of see your point though - the function of having G# and G in the same chord seems to be to make it ambiguously neither-major-nor-minor. And in fact, the rest of the riff features G's and not G sharps... Hmm, I'm almost starting to feel convinced!

Sundar, Saturday, 3 March 2007 05:15 (nineteen years ago)

The guitar's just playing in a minor (pentatonic I presume - I forget how the solo goes) scale over a major chord. They're independent forces and that's the textbook "blue note" dissonance. The #9 chord is more in reference to one instrument playing the full chord itself. I suppose the definition would get a lot stickier if they played a 2nd, #2/b3, and a major 3rd at the same time!

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 3 March 2007 05:30 (nineteen years ago)

I got that but if I were to take (what I see as) Tim's position, the name of the chord should derive from the way the harmony is functioning in the context of the song, where the G is functioning more as a flat 10 than a sharp 9.

However, I've only (until now) ever heard anyone describe that chord as Eaug9, E7#9, or E#9 (or just "the Hendrix chord.")

(Nomenclature is probably not that crucial of an issue anyway.)

Sundar, Saturday, 3 March 2007 05:49 (nineteen years ago)

(The rhythm guitar line during the verses totally contains the full Eaug9 (or Eb10!) chord by the way. It's not just something produced by the lead guitar line soloing in Em over an Emaj chord. You probably realize this but I wasn't sure by reading your post.)

Sundar, Saturday, 3 March 2007 05:58 (nineteen years ago)

Is "Foxy Lady" the most prominent example of the chord?

Sundar, Saturday, 3 March 2007 06:07 (nineteen years ago)

No, Purple Haze

Moodles, Saturday, 3 March 2007 06:14 (nineteen years ago)

This thread is baffling to me, as are most of the ILX boards that take target at canonical classic rock artists. It just seems like sour grapes to me. If you don't like Hendrix, that's your right, but are you really going to change anyone's minds?

I also have never understood the complaints about his voice. I think he has a great voice, not a huge range, but great nonetheless. And I don't really see what's so great about having a "good" voice.

This has already been covered to exhaustion on this thread, but I thought I'd throw in my 2 cents.

Moodles, Saturday, 3 March 2007 06:19 (nineteen years ago)

(The rhythm guitar line during the verses totally contains the full Eaug9 (or Eb10!) chord by the way. It's not just something produced by the lead guitar line soloing in Em over an Emaj chord. You probably realize this but I wasn't sure by reading your post.)

ya, I was talking about "Louie Louie" wrt to the minor solo over major chords. :D

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 3 March 2007 17:03 (nineteen years ago)

"I will say, though, that Greg Tate's new Hendrix book, set to come out in June I think, is as cogent and entertaining an argument as I've read about Hendrix's music, and is highly recommended; its centrally about Hendrix's role in black music and black America, two very under-discussed subjects."

i need to read that book again. at the time tho i thought it charles shaar murray did what tate wanted to do better.

titchyschneiderMk2, Saturday, 3 March 2007 17:06 (nineteen years ago)

If he was such a damn great guitarist, how come all I hear is bass?

NYCNative, Saturday, 3 March 2007 21:48 (nineteen years ago)

shrug.jpg

Hurting 2, Sunday, 4 March 2007 19:35 (nineteen years ago)

Eaug9 would indicate an E augmented chord, i.e. a B sharp. E7#9 is the standard way it would be written.

And Tim, sure, there's no functional difference between calling it a sharp 9 or flat 3rd in this case. But as was alluded to, it's just chord-naming convention: you already have an E major triad with G# as the third, so it's easiest to refer to the other note as a 9th rather than talk about a chord with two thirds. In a melodic part, though, that consideration doesn't matter.

St3ve Go1db3rg, Sunday, 4 March 2007 20:33 (nineteen years ago)

six years pass...

Do you ever take a moment to picture Jimi actually excusing himself from a conversation and then kissing the sky?

#fomo that's the motto (Hurting 2), Sunday, 3 November 2013 16:50 (twelve years ago)

music theory

St3ve Go1db3rg, Sunday, 3 November 2013 16:59 (twelve years ago)

Good Hendrix doco on the BBC this week. I'm not a huge fan, but he was an interesting guy for sure.

I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Sunday, 3 November 2013 17:06 (twelve years ago)

In re the theory stuff above, I would imagine a lot of the conventions of whether a note is *really* a flat x or *really* a sharp y come from the conventions of voice leading in western classical music, none of which really has much impact on the hendrix chord, which is static.

#fomo that's the motto (Hurting 2), Sunday, 3 November 2013 17:08 (twelve years ago)

Whoa, 10 years ago ILM actually took the time to answer a question respectfully even if it was a dumb one and the op was obviously being agressive out of nowhere.

Moka, Sunday, 3 November 2013 17:43 (twelve years ago)

yea nowadays someone would be all like OI SOME BIG BELL-BOTTOMED BIRD IS A-PLAYIN THE BLUESIE-WEWSIES, IMA MAKE A 'ORRIBLE POST TO ME ILXOR CHUMS

your face comes with coleslaw (Neanderthal), Sunday, 3 November 2013 18:10 (twelve years ago)

omfg at that last post. Just spat laughing.

I can still taste the Taboo in my mouth when I hear those songs (Scik Mouthy), Sunday, 3 November 2013 18:28 (twelve years ago)

and his voice rulzxorxed, dammit.

― your null fame (yournullfame), Thursday, March 20, 2003 2:16 AM (10 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

really miss this kind of spirited debate round here

sleepingbag, Sunday, 3 November 2013 18:29 (twelve years ago)

His voice really did rulzxorxed, though.

Moka, Sunday, 3 November 2013 21:02 (twelve years ago)

he had a great voice.
shame it's overshadowed bu his guitar
i don't understand how can anyone think differently.

nostormo, Sunday, 3 November 2013 21:06 (twelve years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koxpJ7nhz2Y

nostormo, Sunday, 3 November 2013 21:12 (twelve years ago)

I would imagine a lot of the conventions of whether a note is *really* a flat x or *really* a sharp y come from the conventions of voice leading in western classical music, none of which really has much impact on the hendrix chord, which is static.

Yeah, but doesn't G in the chord anticipate G as the root of the next chord?

timellison, Sunday, 3 November 2013 22:30 (twelve years ago)

Oh yeah actually that's true

#fomo that's the motto (Hurting 2), Sunday, 3 November 2013 22:44 (twelve years ago)

one year passes...

Good thread. Are You Experienced has great songwriting and performance. If someone is upset about the evil done by SRV and Mayer using Jimi's material, I'd recommend searching 'May This Be Love' on Spotify. There are many good-to-great covers, and perhaps this is a sign of a well written song.

$80 is absurd and very ridiculous! (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 19:15 (eleven years ago)

kinda want to poll these covers, and I'm not sure that I can restrain myself.

$80 is absurd and very ridiculous! (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 19:29 (eleven years ago)

i'm gonna start strumming the guitar with my penis. i will get so popular. people will adore me for that. i will have the biggest fanbase cos i'm such an innovator.
― JP Albin (John Paul Albin), Thursday, March 20, 2003 2:49 AM (11 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

The Complainte of Ray Tabano, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 20:14 (eleven years ago)

JP Tanuki more like

$80 is absurd and very ridiculous! (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 20:15 (eleven years ago)

I want to put out a guitar record under the stage name Tad Overrated

walid foster dulles (man alive), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 20:46 (eleven years ago)

haha

$80 is absurd and very ridiculous! (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 20:50 (eleven years ago)

album is called "Just a Tad"

walid foster dulles (man alive), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 20:52 (eleven years ago)

horrible album titles...

Dokken played here for a Ribfest and people were total assholes (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 21:02 (eleven years ago)

Ellen McIlwaine actually has a few interesting Jimi covers and is basically awesome

$80 is absurd and very ridiculous! (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 14 January 2015 17:44 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.