Big Dictator Gives Out MTV Musical Guidelines To Salute To: Free Expression Begins to Slide to Hell

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Got this directive in my inbox, and all I've got to say is: MTV Europe has got mucho nerve. From InternalMemos.com:

MTV (Europe)
Recommendations for the scheduling and content of videos and programmes

Dear all

In the light of the outbreak of war in Iraq in the last 12 hours, our recommendations for the scheduling and content of videos and programmes are as follows:

1. Video recommendations

Obviously, there will be heightened public sensitivity to representations of war, soldiers, bombing, destruction of buildings and public unrest at home. The ITC Programme Code requires us not to broadcast material which offends against good taste or is offensive to public feeling. We therefore recommend that videos featuring the following are not shown at the moment:

war
soldiers
war planes
bombs
missiles
riots and social unrest
executions
other obviously sensitive material

Examples include:
System of a Down "Boom!" - anti-war video containing facts and figures about, amongst other things, the projected casualties in the war in Iraq.
Aerosmith "Don't want to miss a thing" - contains footage from the film "Armageddon".
Manic Street Preachers "So Why So Sad" - contains footage of soldiers being killed and man throwing a hand grenade.
Passengers/U2 "Miss Sarajevo" - contains missiles, guns and buildings being blown up.
Bon Jovi "This ain't a love song" - contains war scenes and victims in distress.
Iggy Pop "Corruption" - contains wars, riots, guns and captions "we love guns" and "we love rifles".
Paul Hardcastle "19" - contains war footage.
Radiohead "Lucky" - contains war footage including injured children.
Billy Idol "Hot in the City" - contains an atomic explosion.
Armand van Helden "Koochy" - contains an atomic explosion and ships being blown up.
Trick Daddy "Thug Holiday" - contains soldiers being killed at war.

Furthermore, videos with words such as "bomb", "missile", "war" or other sensitive words in the artist or song title should not be shown at the moment.

Examples include:
Outkast "B.O.B (Bombs over Baghdad)" - song title may offend.
Radiohead "Invasion" - song title may offend.
Megadeth "Holy Wars" - song title may offend.
Gavin Friday "You, Me and World War Three" - song title may offend.
B-52s videos.

Also, please note that some evergreen tapes contain sensitive videos e.g. until recently, the MTV2 evergreen contained the Outkast "B.O.B. (Bombs over Baghdad)". We therefore recommend that music programmers ensure that inappropriate songs are removed from the evergreen tape for the duration the war.

Please note that this is not a definitive list of videos. Please use the ITC video restrictions database to check each song before broadcast. If you are aware of any other videos featuring the above images, titled with the above words or which may be unsuitable for broadcast in the light of the outbreak of war, we recommend that these are pulled from your schedules.

2. Programme recommendations

Under the ITC's rules, we have two main obligations regarding programmes:

(a) Not to broadcast material which offends against good taste or is offensive to public feeling.
For example, no programme should contain:
(i) images of war, bombs, missiles, etc that are likely to be seen as insensitive or offensive at this time (see above for further guidance).
(ii) jokes about the war, about bombing Iraqis, about the American, Iraqi or UK troops.
(iii) comments about the war that are likely to be seen as insensitive or offensive.

Furthermore, the content of each long-form show should be considered before scheduling. Scripts for presenters and news pieces must also be treated with great sensitivity.

(b) To ensure that our programmes treat the issue of war in Iraq with "due accuracy" and "due impartiality".
Therefore, we need to ensure that any programme which deals with issue of war in Iraq:
(i) deals fairly with each opposing view. It cannot be one-sided. Both sides of the argument need to be dealt with, and dealt with fairly.
(ii) does not give the view of MTV or the views of MTV presenters.
(iii) does not give facts, or opinions based on facts, that are incorrect e.g. an anti-war argument that states the war is bad because 50 million Iraqis will die (the official estimates are much lower than that), a pro-war argument that states Saddam Hussein should be toppled because he is going to invade Israel (there is no evidence of this). You need to ensure that any facts included in your programmes are accurate, and verified by an official source e.g. an Amnesty International report, a UN report, Reuters news service.

Mark

Broadcast Standards Manager
MTV Networks Europe


Pardon me, but when the hell did the viewing public lose its intelligence? This isn't like watching the news reports on TV, these are video pieces that last 4-6 minutes. If we start banning songs based on images/song titles, the only thing left are boy-band melodrama. I certainly am not saying let's be insensitive to other people's feelings, but fuckin' hell, let's try to keep some persepective!


Ahem, rant done;>


So, am I missing something? Is this a time to limit exposure and expression?



Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 17:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Welcome to the United Soviet Socialist Republic of America!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 18:12 (twenty-three years ago)

We already did this: mtv self-censorship

Amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 18:16 (twenty-three years ago)

What? MTV isn't actually interested in interesting, pertinent broadcasting? This is an outrage!

Sarcasm Is The Best Policy (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 18:19 (twenty-three years ago)

I can't believe MTV would limit its own ability to express itself freely. If I were MTV I would be incensed. I would form a coalition called "MTV against MTV" and then protest MTV.

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 18:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Haha okay that was glib and unrealistic, nevermind. But, you know, they're not a news source or some sort of forum for democracy, they're not responsible for "free expression" any more than ABC is responsible for giving CBS sitcoms equal time. They're just selecting their programming to avoid a topic. Which is a good idea, I think, because -- as mentioned on the other thread -- anyone watching MTV in a time of war is taking a pretty pointed break from watching the news, and probably doesn't care to see echoes of it.

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 18:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Amaturist: ta for the heads-up.

Nabisco: point taken. My main concern is the overall effect on the viewers. Don't we still have a right to watch a channel, without worrying if it has been scrubbed clean first? After all, MTV isn't Al-Jazeera, last I checked.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 19:18 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't like MTV's attitude here.

I think it would be okay for them to ignore the war, people watch MTV for a bit of fun, but they seem to be pretending it isn't happening.

Don't they think people will realise they're being patronized?

mei (mei), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 19:22 (twenty-three years ago)

After all, MTV isn't Al-Jazeera, last I checked.

I think you'd find Al-Jazeera very far from being "scrubbed clean."

Amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 19:32 (twenty-three years ago)

MTV in good taste SHOCKAH!

girl scout heroin (iamamonkey), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 22:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Just cuz something's not on MTV doesn't mean you can't buy and listen

dave q, Tuesday, 25 March 2003 22:26 (twenty-three years ago)

I do not care.

, Wednesday, 26 March 2003 17:25 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.