Strings of Life, c or d?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
overrated? genius?

OCP (OCP), Saturday, 10 January 2004 00:35 (twenty-two years ago)

c. very, very c.

M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 10 January 2004 00:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Matos OTM.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 10 January 2004 00:41 (twenty-two years ago)

why though, Matos?

OCP (OCP), Saturday, 10 January 2004 00:43 (twenty-two years ago)

tension, mainly, both elements-wise (serene piano + skippety hi-hats + razorlike strings) and due to the fact that the piano and string-hits are obviously being played-not-programmed; there are these hair's-breadth hesitations (esp. toward the end) when the strings come in that keep you on your toes. the patterns are basic but also really pretty, and I don't think anyone has ever programmed hi-hats better than Derrick May

M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 10 January 2004 00:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I also love how it's structured in verse-chorus-bridge fashion but doesn't feel like it's moving from one to the other in a linear way, more like jumping in and out of an ongoing fresco, each part hearing/seeing it at different angles; the "chorus," particularly the way the hi-hats seems to roll in perfect wide circles while the strings punctuate them (it's sort of the aural equivalent of Captain Marvel/Shazam's logo) is the body, and then when we get the piano breakdown with occasional string-stab, it feels like a jump-cut to each corner of it. I also love the slow-rising, hollow-exhaling strings that rise near-imperceptibly in the background while the stabs do their thing.

M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 10 January 2004 00:50 (twenty-two years ago)

i've never been convinced that the fluctuating volume of the strings at the start and the seeming mistiming of same string stabs is a good thing. but i still absolutely adore the track and even the Ashley Beedle rework from '95

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 10 January 2004 00:56 (twenty-two years ago)

cl-ass-ic
love it¡ love it¡ love it¡ love it¡
love it¡ love it¡ love it¡ love it¡
that tiny little fuck-up towards the end matos mentioned - love it¡ love it¡

dyson (dyson), Saturday, 10 January 2004 03:15 (twenty-two years ago)

When people refer to "Strings of Life" are they talking about the piano version or the flam-boy-ant mix or... or... something else?

Keeping track of all these remixes is a real pain in the ass.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Saturday, 10 January 2004 04:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Gosh, Matos. Your two breakdowns of the tune are lovely. I mean - Shazam AND Derrick May? V., v. excellent/


Oh, yeah --- "Strings" is classic. Beautiful machine music as only D. May could make it back when he did. Resonant to so many people for so many varied reasons. Absolutely deserves its crown.

Jay Vee (Manon_70), Saturday, 10 January 2004 05:27 (twenty-two years ago)

As for the fuck ups: you do know that May would often mix live to tape (cassette, reel to reel) while punching in and out of his sequencer or mixer or playing synths/drum machine. The mistakes were kept out of respect for the tune or necessity.

Jay Vee (Manon_70), Saturday, 10 January 2004 05:33 (twenty-two years ago)

WHat a brilliant thread already. Great great stuff from Matos. He has me scrambling for the cd to replay it. And yeah, the tune is a total classic.

Broheems (diamond), Saturday, 10 January 2004 06:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm starting to re-assess it (!) Thanks for your great posts, Matos!

OCP (OCP), Saturday, 10 January 2004 07:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Never heard it, sounds good though.

Sean g, Saturday, 10 January 2004 10:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I prefer Beyond The Dance!

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 10 January 2004 11:40 (twenty-two years ago)

it is a very weird record if you wanted a techno classic

mullygrubber (gaz), Saturday, 10 January 2004 12:41 (twenty-two years ago)

classic! especially the version without drums. (well it's got a few kicks in it) the one on relics. it transcends genre...talk about bringing feeling to the machines...

disco stu (disco stu), Saturday, 10 January 2004 13:30 (twenty-two years ago)

yes. the version on relics. so beautiful. that's the best. you wait for the drums...and only on the last measure...

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Saturday, 10 January 2004 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)

"sol" is one of those tracks where when people diss it i get a kind of reactionary bafflement look on my face ala "oh, you're just being CONTRARY". one of the few times this has happened.

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 10 January 2004 21:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I know fuck all about May/Detroit techno in general, but I love love love this song. It has a real sense of beauty - "bringing feeling to machines" indeed!

Sonny A. (Keiko), Saturday, 10 January 2004 21:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Classic apparently written about Martin Luther King - "When they killed him, they destroyed the hopes and dreams of a generation. It was about the hope in his message." Friend Michael James had written the piano piece previously. May took snippers and created loops. When it was finished, he listened to it constantly for six days, overtaken by it's mesmeric curves.

From Mixmag: "His best known track, 'Strings Of Life' comes from these days, a demo tape he gave Frankie Knuckles to play in his club. It was Frankie who named the song. "It just went crazy," smiles Derrick. "It just exploded. It was like something you can't imagine, the kind of power and energy people got off that record when it was first heard. Mike Dunn says he has no idea how people can accept a record that doesn't have a bassline. It had never dawned on me that 'Strings' didn't have a bassline." Not that it needed one because like a lot of May's productions, in 'Strings' everything from the strings, the blips, the sequences, the keyboards and sounds all move to create rhythm. It's as if the funk has infected every part of the track so the whole thing jiggles and dances like a crazy bag of bones some shaman is waving over the dancefloor. His secret, he claims, is simple - he saves the drums for last. "80% of all my songs have always started with strings, it's like a mood, a frame of mind. I don't always end up using those strings but that's the way I start and from there I just build. I'm a metronome working kind of guy, I make the music to the metronome. Tick. Tick. Tick. Tick. The last thing I do is add the drums. Too many people use drums as a piece de resistance to their music. That's dumb. Drums are an accent. That's it. You should be able to make a track and not even use drums. You should be able to have so much power that you don't need drums."

Agree about the sublime "Unreleased Mix" version which is second only to his "Illusion First Mix" of Sueno Latino. Mmmm.

Avoid the recent wiggedy Soul Central/Danny Krivit cover

bahktin, Saturday, 10 January 2004 23:38 (twenty-two years ago)

there was another 'cover' by Astrofarm called 'Strings Ain't What It Used To Be' doing the rounds briefly in '95/'96

stevem (blueski), Sunday, 11 January 2004 02:01 (twenty-two years ago)

The Dok's jungle remix from '94: fucking classic.

Andrew (enneff), Sunday, 11 January 2004 02:38 (twenty-two years ago)

> the piano and string-hits are obviously being played-not-programmed; there are these hair's-breadth hesitations

A classic example of how one's mileage may vary. When I finally got to hear this much-lauded track I was boggled by how sloppy it sounded. What others acclaim as the humanisation of electronics just seems half-assed to me.

Palomino (Palomino), Sunday, 11 January 2004 21:59 (twenty-two years ago)

i pretty much agree. i've never felt the track would be any weaker if that intro's elements were actually fully in sync with each other and not fading in/out - tho the 'recorded live' aspect IS certainly admirable.

stevem (blueski), Sunday, 11 January 2004 23:39 (twenty-two years ago)

three years pass...

dude was obviously manic

lfam, Monday, 21 May 2007 02:46 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.