Billboard to Sluts: Go Home

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Angst-Ridden Public Sours on Musical
Raunch



By Keith Girard and Liz Skinner

NEW YORK (Billboard) - Christina vamps like a burlesque stripper. Britney's gone from
school girl to slut. Pink is punk.

Many of music's reigning divas are partying like it's 1999, even
though the world has become a darker, more uncertain and
more anxious place since Sept. 11, 2001.

With the economy in a funk and record sales down for three
years running, even established artists are sexing it up -- no
doubt encouraged by edgy industry executives.

The problem is, the public just doesn't seem to be in the mood
for it, and the recent mediocre album sales by Spears, Pink
and similar artists may reflect a classic case of mismarketing.

"When social and economic times are more threatening and
pessimistic, we actually prefer others with more mature facial,
body and personality characteristics," says Terry Pettijohn, a
Ph.D. social psychologist at Mercyhurst College in Erie, Pa.

TARTING UP

If Pettijohn's observations are accurate, then industry executives who are pushing artists to "tart it
up" are miscalculating the market and could be damaging careers.

"Audiences are listening to lyrics more," says Ron Vos, president/chief executive of Hi Frequency
Marketing in North Carolina. "They're focused on content and story line, not dancing and having
fun, and they want the artist to reflect that."

Indeed, female artists who are succeeding on the radio and on the charts have tapped into the
nation's post-Sept. 11 soul-searching.

Vos, whose firm worked with Avril Lavigne (news) and Norah Jones (news), says these artists are
writing music that's about being in touch with your values. They portray themselves as self-made
people who write about their feelings, he says.

Sex certainly sells. The concept has been around as long as advertising. But Lavigne and Jones
reflect a different kind of sexuality that's much subtler, more genuine and thus more alluring in a
time of crisis.

Given the national mood, such nuances could easily be the difference between strong and mediocre
sales.

One of the hottest breakthrough groups of last year, rock band Evanescence, is fronted by Amy Lee,
who is appalled by the crass marketing of some pop stars. "Talking bad about Britney is like
beating a dead horse; I won't even go there," she says.

But what really bothers Lee are female artists who are good writers or good singers but have gone
from being "really classy and cool to just stripping it all away."

Jewel, for example, has gone from folk songstress to cover girl, and 40-something Sheryl Crow
(news) struts onstage in hot pants even as she bemoans that other artists are being marketed like
"porn stars."

"Obviously, sex is the most basic thing that you can," Lee says. "I mean, you sell yourself, and I
just hate it."

TRAMP TREND

From Spears' kiss with Madonna (news - web sites) at the MTV Video Music
Awards to Pink's onstage antics at the Billboard Music Awards, the trend toward
trampiness shows no signs of abating.

But some academic research suggests that it runs counter to current economic,
social and demographic trends.

Last spring, Pettijohn and University of Georgia professor Abraham Tesser
presented a paper to the American Psychological Society in Atlanta that examined
how the social and economic environment affects human preferences.

"In times of trouble, strong, stable, supportive people are favored," he says. "When
times are good, we tend to favor the fun person."

To reach that conclusion, the researchers studied the public's preferences for
actresses between 1932 and 1995.

Individuals preferred smaller eyes, thinner cheeks and larger chins in bad times,
and women with larger eyes, fuller cheeks and smaller chins in good times, the
study found.

"The U.S. is always going back and forth between our puritan values and our need
for indulgences," says Sharon Livingston of the Livingston Group, a Windham,
N.H., marketing and research firm.

Indeed, American attitudes about sex have moved in cycles that roughly follow the
economy, according to Robert Fogarty, a history professor at Antioch College in
Ohio.

In the early 1900s, the prim "Gibson Girl," who represented serene self-confidence,
was the prevailing icon. By the Roaring '20s, flappers were the rage.

"Flappers were nearly showing their knees," Fogarty says. "There was a personal
liberation and freedom."

During the Great Depression and World War II, the prevailing female image
changed again. But by the postwar boom of the 1950s, the pendulum had swung
back.

Sultry sex kittens like Marilyn Monroe (news), Bridget Bardot and Jayne
Mansfield (news) became screen stars. And Playboy magazine was launched.

CHANGE OF TUNE

Currently, songs with a mellow, introspective approach are finding a receptive U.S.
audience, in part because of the confusion and sense of change in the wake of
Sept. 11, according to Ball State University pop culture expert Richard Aquila.

That mood plays into the resurgence of the singer/songwriter, where audiences are
eager to hear what the individual has to say, he says.

"There's been a turn toward traditional values," Aquila adds.

Alicia Keys (news) is representative of the trend. Her songs are introspective and
soulful. Her image, while sexual, also exudes strength and character. Not
surprisingly, her latest album is doing well on the charts.

Norah Jones is sexy, Livingston says. But "she's using libido in a gentle way and
talking about relationships. It's a more constructive use of her libido, but she's still
creating interest and intrigue."

She's saying, "'Come be with me, and you'll feel good about yourself,"' she
explains.

Spears, of course, has played the sex card most often and most blatantly in the
face of declining sales.

Her biggest single, "... Baby One More Time," cut when her image was more
wholesome, spent 39 weeks on the singles charts in 1998, including seven weeks
in the top spot.

Her last single to hit No. 1 on the charts was "I'm a Slave 4 U" in 2001. It spent
one week at the top.

Despite massive hype, Spears' latest album is posting only so-so sales. And Pink's
latest release is suffering as well. Sales of "Try This" have fallen far short of her
previous blockbuster album.

According to a source, her label is privately worried that she has been tarting it up
too much. For her part, Pink says artists are just using what they've got.

"I don't think there's anything wrong with being sexy, but people use what they
have," she says. "If people have a great voice, then you use your voice; if you have
a great mind, then you speak a lot; if you have a great body, then you take your
clothes off."

That may work if you're 20-something, but Evanescence's Lee isn't the only person
who finds the trend disturbing among such established, talented female artists as
Toni Braxton (news), Liz Phair (news) and LeAnn Rimes (news).

Gina Vivinetto, pop music critic for Florida's St. Petersburg Times, noted in an
article last summer that it's as if someone had issued a memo to every woman in
rock. "No matter how seriously she once took herself, no matter how good her
voice or her level of talent, must start looking like a tramp."

It's unclear whether America will still show a penchant for buying somber melodies
this year if U.S. troops start to return from Iraq (news - web sites) and the stock
market continues to climb.

Such changes could adjust the American disposition. But judging by the reaction to
Spears' recent marital escapade in Las Vegas, the public is no longer amused; it's
annoyed.

Luigi Vampa (Horace Mann), Monday, 19 January 2004 18:59 (twenty-two years ago)

"pink is punk"?!?!

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 19 January 2004 19:05 (twenty-two years ago)

i mean, yeah, but shouldnt that make her MORE in line with our nu-angst ridden culture??

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 19 January 2004 19:06 (twenty-two years ago)

There's something I don't quite buy about the idea of a "national mood," much less one that directly correlates with our entertainment preferences.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 19 January 2004 19:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean, there are PLENTY of reasons why Britney, Xtina, and Pink might be underperforming. But oh yeah, it's because the public prefers more mature facial features post-9/11.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 19 January 2004 19:10 (twenty-two years ago)

To reach that conclusion, the researchers studied the public's preferences for
actresses between 1932 and 1995.

Individuals preferred smaller eyes, thinner cheeks and larger chins in bad times,
and women with larger eyes, fuller cheeks and smaller chins in good times, the
study found.

I would love to see the data on this.

Luigi Vampa (Horace Mann), Monday, 19 January 2004 19:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Haha, yes, Britney's first single was more successful because it was *more wholesome*, not because it was her FIRST SINGLE, from a new pop star, etc.

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 19 January 2004 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)

"Audiences are listening to lyrics more," says Ron Vos, president/chief executive of Hi Frequency
Marketing in North Carolina. "They're focused on content and story line, not dancing and having
fun, and they want the artist to reflect that."

And you thought I supposedly hated fun.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 19 January 2004 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)

POP MUSIC INDUSTRY BANS DANCING AND FUN

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 19 January 2004 19:23 (twenty-two years ago)

*more wholesome* in a slutty little schoolgirl/pedo-baiting way.

Luigi Vampa (Horace Mann), Monday, 19 January 2004 19:25 (twenty-two years ago)

This bullshit is always hilarious, attempting to take small sample sizes of individual artists and extrapolate them out into some sort of vast meaning, "our culture currently does't like X and instead prefers Y because of this post-Z attitude towards things."

Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 19 January 2004 19:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Individuals preferred smaller eyes, thinner cheeks and larger chins in bad times

Please notice the small eyes and thin cheeks on the top box-office draw during the Great Depression:

http://jewel.posty.net/cards/cardst2.jpg

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 19 January 2004 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Gear so OTM about trash journalism info-tainment- see also stupid Time magazine covers "The pokemon craze, why is everyone buying it" "Lord of the rings: why we need fantasy right now" etc. etc. puke

sucka (sucka), Monday, 19 January 2004 21:01 (twenty-two years ago)

I find it hilarious that people can make a living providing such insight, no wonder the music biz isn't making any money.

earlnash, Monday, 19 January 2004 21:22 (twenty-two years ago)

this article would have been a lot better if "Billboard to Sluts: Go Home" was the actual title.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 19 January 2004 21:43 (twenty-two years ago)

One of the hottest breakthrough groups of last year, rock band Evanescence, is fronted by Amy Lee,
who is appalled by the crass marketing of some pop stars. "Talking bad about Britney is like
beating a dead horse; I won't even go there," she says.

I like that, because the quote doesn't even match how he set up the quote. He obviously wanted her to say that Britney was a slut, she didn't, but he went right away and said she was "appaled by the crass marketing of some pop stars" anyway. ...okay!

There's something I don't quite buy about the idea of a "national mood," much less one that directly correlates with our entertainment preferences.
-- jaymc (jmcunnin...), January 19th, 2004.

That's debatable. A slagging economy and fear of terrorist attacks obviously would affect a large amount of people in perhaps a simmilar way, but bringing that all the way towards not liking Britney Spears any more is ridiculous.

It seems to me the logicial reason is people are just kind of bored of it, new pop needs to happen every 5 years or so. Spears and Pink are the flavor of 1999.

David Allen (David Allen), Monday, 19 January 2004 21:58 (twenty-two years ago)

This thread has the greatest title ever.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 19 January 2004 22:04 (twenty-two years ago)

when the "national mood" is more of a negative one, aren't people drawn more to escapist entertainment.

dyson (dyson), Monday, 19 January 2004 22:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Usually, but they're saying people want cleaner escapist entertainment.

LondonLee (LondonLee), Monday, 19 January 2004 22:26 (twenty-two years ago)

As opposed to dirrty.

Leee Majors (Leee), Monday, 19 January 2004 22:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Usually, but they're saying people want cleaner escapist entertainment.

yeah, like in the turbulent 60's, when nobody wanted to have anything to do with sex. or like that article said about flappers during the depression...oh, wait, it didn't say that.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 19 January 2004 23:08 (twenty-two years ago)

it's very confusing to read. was it translated from another language?

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 19 January 2004 23:09 (twenty-two years ago)

It's also funny just because...."Britney Spears record sales are declining!! This makes no sense - a teen pop sensation falling out of favor with the record buying public....Clearly this must be a result of some far-reaching, profound change in our society."

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 19 January 2004 23:12 (twenty-two years ago)

"Does Justin Timberlake's solo career represent the United States' (Justin's) reluctance to comply with the U.N.'s (*NSYNC'S) peacekeeping resolutions (funky brand of boyband pop) in Iraq (Top 40 radio)?"

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 19 January 2004 23:43 (twenty-two years ago)

"Next week: How has 'drums' affected U.S. foreign policy?"

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 19 January 2004 23:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Norah Jones is sexy, Livingston says. But "she's using libido in a gentle way and talking about relationships. It's a more constructive use of her libido, but she's still creating interest and intrigue."

Wow man, that's like, soooo deep.

We'll see if he's still saying that when her second album sells half as many copies as the first.


Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Monday, 19 January 2004 23:57 (twenty-two years ago)

It's a more constructive use of her libido

I use my libido to build low-income housing in the rural South.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 00:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Norah has to use her libido for relationships because she can't have orgasms.

edward o (edwardo), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 00:38 (twenty-two years ago)

what did pink do at the billboard music awards?

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 00:43 (twenty-two years ago)

did she showed her boobies?

the surface noise (electricsound), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 00:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Where are all these serious, angsty people?? Doesn't that just mean they listen to John Mayer or Jack Johnson or something? Ooooh, d33p!

Blood and sparkles (bloodandsparkles), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 01:02 (twenty-two years ago)

she's using libido in a gentle way

fucking me softly with her song!

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 01:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Thanks, now I know how Tenacious D will score a hit with a power ballad.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 01:17 (twenty-two years ago)

britney's next album will be all dashboard confessional covers.

keith m (keithmcl), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 02:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I actually wouldn't be surprised at this point.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 02:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't think it's so stupid to talk about how depictions of female sexuality reflect national mood because at least it's a step away from 'it's natural and red blooded to want to see naked women what are you complaining about you feminazi there's nothing arbitrary in this'.

On the other hand it does seem to turn out sounding like 'women will always be evaluated in terms of their sexual appeal, it's just the way it's packaged that varies from decade to decade'.

I just read that the Fox network was showing this drama series based on a porn business, but they had to pull it because the ratings were so low. I mean how debased can you get. You stoop as low as you can, and you fail on top of that. Not that failure or success should theoretically count when you're evaluating someone's greed but you know. That really seemed funny.

a, Tuesday, 20 January 2004 04:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Er, I thought the probs with Britney et al, wasn't that they were in tha buff, but that their records were duff!!!! Maybe the real lesson is "Don't do it in the scud if you're tune is utter crud!!!"

Old Fart!!! (oldfart_sd), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 13:20 (twenty-two years ago)

The new social conservatism is really starting to piss me off. Hopefully the Iraq quagmire will be even worse than Vietnam so it'll at least be more like the 60s than the fuckin' 50s like it is now.

dave q, Tuesday, 20 January 2004 13:25 (twenty-two years ago)

with lines like
Many of music's reigning divas are partying like it's 1999, even
though the world has become a darker, more uncertain and
more anxious place since Sept. 11, 2001.

the trend toward
trampiness shows no signs of abating.

I had to double check to see if it was written by David Addleson.

What horseshit.

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 13:40 (twenty-two years ago)

This sort of thing was really noticeable on that top 100 worst singles thing on C4 too - lots of laddish male presenters putting down Xtina etc for being sluts, slags, tarts - nasty stuff.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Alex Zane in particular, dropping the particular jem "People say Atomic Kitten are ugly, but look at Vanilla!".

Can we look at you as well, you scrawny imp-faced greaseball?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 13:48 (twenty-two years ago)

"From Spears' kiss with Madonna at the MTV Video Music Awards to Pink's onstage antics at the Billboard Music Awards, the trend toward trampiness shows no signs of abating."

Since when did PDAs become a sign of trampiness?

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Norah Jones is sexy, Livingston says. But "she's using libido in a gentle way and talking about relationships. It's a more constructive use of her libido, but she's still creating interest and intrigue."

Wow, I thought it was just because she looks pretty nice. Anything that persuades Christina Aguilera to wear more clothes cannot be a bad thing surely?

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)

"Dirrty" is Xtina's best video, though! (And her best single.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 14:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I like the girl but who told her she was sexy?

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 14:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Someone who'd had a few too many.

LondonLee (LondonLee), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 15:04 (twenty-two years ago)

this just in:

Blender to Sluts: Show Us Yr Tits

Luigi Vampa (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 15:04 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.