― shookout (shookout), Thursday, 8 April 2004 16:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― JaXoN (JasonD), Thursday, 8 April 2004 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 8 April 2004 17:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― JaXoN (JasonD), Thursday, 8 April 2004 17:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 8 April 2004 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― JaXoN (JasonD), Thursday, 8 April 2004 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 8 April 2004 17:57 (twenty-two years ago)
Love this.
― Bag Smart, Street Stupid (Eazy), Tuesday, 10 August 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)
I read some of Ned Rorem's diary excerpts from "A Ned Rorem Reader" and it seemed extremely self-congratulatory, but interesting for a portrait of the art world at the time.
― Janet Privacy Control (corey), Tuesday, 10 August 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
i really enjoyed some of his books on music. i could tell that we lived on two completely different planets but i like the way he writes about music.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 10 August 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)
kinda like how i used to enjoy reading stephen spender's books on literature. we probably didn't have very much in common when it came to art or life, but as criticism goes it was very enjoyable. i don't know why i thought of him. maybe i read them both during the same period in my life. for a while the only lit crit i read was spender, auden, and connolly. and chesterton! i would put on my club tie before reading.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 10 August 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)