Did Blues other than 12-bar exist?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I finished paul morley's 'words and music' the other day and he mentioned that it did, but 12-bar was commercially more viable so it became the standard.

any records out there?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 9 April 2004 09:31 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't proclaim to be a blues expert, but certainly there is at least one other 'standard' set of changes - the 8-bar blues - and if you listen to Blind Lemon Jefferson, for example, you'll find plenty of tunes where he's making up a form or twisting a 12-bar slightly. The old bluesmen would say that the blues was just the way they played and sang - a nebulous 'style' - not a compositional form.

The other 'standard' aspect of the blues is the line/repeat line/payoff verse format. This fits into the 12-bar compositional structure, but it can fit into others too, and was/is violated frequently.

There, now I'm acting like an expert, but there are definitely people who can express this better and with more evidence.

southern lights (southern lights), Friday, 9 April 2004 12:14 (twenty-two years ago)

What about all the one and two-chord blues like Mississippi Fred McDowell? That strain is still going strong (the Fat Possum artists I've heard seem to come from this tradition). I'm not really qualified to answer except to say that the only old blues I like now is not 12-bar.

Mark (MarkR), Friday, 9 April 2004 12:41 (twenty-two years ago)

There's quite a bit of 16-bar blues too, where 12-bar blues is usually I-IV-V, most 16-bar blueses I've ever heard/played have been I-IV-V-VII. I'm trying to think of an example but my (stoner) mind is drawing a blank (surprisingly ha ha).

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 9 April 2004 12:43 (twenty-two years ago)

now playing on my computer (courtesy of uncut's "the roots of tommy" cd): muddy waters, "mannish boy." one chord. hard to figure out many bars it is, whatwith it having no distinct parts.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 9 April 2004 13:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, everybody else OTM. I've heard a lot of Muddy Waters that's just one chord, and a lot of 16 bar blues as well.

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 9 April 2004 13:38 (twenty-two years ago)

of course most old blues players would fuck w/ the format such that you'd have 13 and 14.5 bar blueses

brains (cerybut), Friday, 9 April 2004 14:21 (twenty-two years ago)

The key here is the added instrumental bars...
as in
(to make it all up from standard tropes)

Going to Chicago, gonna wear my ball and chain (2 bars + 2 bars, add your own blues lick)
Going to Chicago, blah blah blah blah blah (2 +2)
Going to Calumet, cause that place is all the same (2 +2)

You can add or drop any number of bars in this. The key is not the number of bars but the pattern of vocal/instrumental alternation. The cool thing about the structure is that it's got a built-in section for instrumental embellishment of the vocal.

It is a compositional form. Guys like Robert Pete Williams and Skip James went beyond it or behind it. There's a tonality implied along with the form. It's infinitely flexible, as the '40s jump-blues and Texas guys like Saunders King and T-Bone Walker proved with all their 9th chords and so forth, but it's still the basic I-IV-V. You can go to the V without going to the IV, you can go back down to the I without going back up to the V. "Mannish Boy" is based on a two-bar riff. It's got an implied triplet feel. The riff implies the I-IV-V thing. It's just a riff and that's it, so calling it a whatever-bar blues doesn't really make sense.

Some of the blues players might fuck with the format but they weren't aware of what they were doing too much, and a lot of that was simply the fact that they were playing without a band. Howlin' Wolf was good at seeming to come in at the wrong time, actually he did come in at the wrong time a lot, but it works because he had such a sense of dramatic and of rhythm, as on the great mid-'60s "My Mind Is Ramblin'."

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Friday, 9 April 2004 14:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Very informative post...if I read you correctly "Mannish Boy" doesn't follow blues chord structure or blues lyrical structure (both of which seem obvious) so what makes it blues, then?

Mark (MarkR), Friday, 9 April 2004 14:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Or is that where the blues had a baby and named it rock'n'roll?

Mark (MarkR), Friday, 9 April 2004 14:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Seventh chords and pentatonics?

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 9 April 2004 14:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Mark, it really is that most blues players would just tell you that the blues is a style or a mood, not a compositional structure or a rigid set of chords. Most of these guys really didn't know what they were doing - they were learning from each other and making stuff up - the idea of regularizing it came from people who saw dominant compositional trends in the music and wanted to develop a common language.

southern lights (southern lights), Friday, 9 April 2004 15:01 (twenty-two years ago)

I think most musicians regardless of style feel a lot of tension between the need to describe their music in stylistic terms that lay people can understand vs. the fact that they are just playing what comes out of them without regard for stylistic 'rules', which usually weren't determined by the progeintors of the style.

What a run-on sentence.

southern lights (southern lights), Friday, 9 April 2004 15:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Also, the 7-part PBS film series, 'The Blues', was largely an attempt to reclaim the blues as a nebulous feeling or mood from the people who have made it into a 12-bar borefest.

The series is a lot to get through, and some parts aren't so great, but it does leave a lasting impression. The best single part is Wim Wenders' Skip James segments, where he uses an actor and an old handcrank camera to essentially film faked-up performance footage (with source soundtrack) of Skip in his day. It sounds goofy, but it really works.

southern lights (southern lights), Friday, 9 April 2004 15:06 (twenty-two years ago)

I think most musicians regardless of style feel a lot of tension between the need to describe their music in stylistic terms that lay people can understand vs. the fact that they are just playing what comes out of them without regard for stylistic 'rules'

it's not only lay people that need to understand, it's also the other musicians in your band. if a particular composition happens to be a 12-bar blues, it can be extraordinarily helpful to be able to tell your drummer and your bass player and whoever else that "it's a 12-bar blues in A." if you don't have that basic shorthand, it's ok, everybody else will figure out what you're doing soon enough anyway. but the plain fact is, about 98 percent of the time in popular music, you're following some stylistic rule or another, whether or not you know it.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 9 April 2004 15:20 (twenty-two years ago)

That is a good point about shorthand for bands, but I disagree with the 98% ratio. I don't really know how much rules-based shorthand there is outside of a few blues forms. Obviously people use referential shorthand all the time - "this is kind of like 'You Really Got Me'" or 'just a straight four-on-the-floor disco beat', but there aren't that many rules for compositional structure.

Actually, using the disco beat as an example, there are plenty of rules for rhythmic patterns, so there's something.

southern lights (southern lights), Friday, 9 April 2004 15:28 (twenty-two years ago)

i mean "rules" in a loose sense ... in the sense, for example, that nearly every line of every verse in every pop song has an even number of bars ... and in the sense that all those emo songs have those driving eighth-note beats ... and in the sense that country songwriters love the I-IV and the I-IV-V even more than blues songwriters do ... or in the just plain basic domination of the 4/4 beat.

we all mess with the basic structures in our own ways, but in the end 98 percent of us are doing variations on the same basic thing. if anything, i'd argue that the 98 percent figure is low.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 9 April 2004 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, that's true.

southern lights (southern lights), Friday, 9 April 2004 15:43 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.48chicagoblues.com/Reobert%20Johnson%20for%20web%20site/Charlie%20Patton%20cover.jpg

Charlie Patton's music certainly didn't always adhere to the 12-bar format.

Jazzbo (jmcgaw), Friday, 9 April 2004 18:56 (twenty-two years ago)

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00000I0Y1.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

then again, charley didn't always adhere to any particular way to spell his name.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 9 April 2004 19:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes they did exist, and surprisingly within the context of white dancehall bands of the 1930s, playing what they called "Delta Blues". My grandfather plays this stuff for me, and it is def. not 12-bar.

Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 9 April 2004 20:00 (twenty-two years ago)

http://image.allmusic.com/00/amg/cov200/drc000/c079/c079272vdap.jpg

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 9 April 2004 20:03 (twenty-two years ago)

julio, search: the hill country blues style of northern mississippi which is seldom 12 bar.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 9 April 2004 20:07 (twenty-two years ago)

In addition to Patton, James, and Robert Pete Williams, a pair of artists who often deviated from the bar structure were two of the most canonical: John Lee Hooker and Lightnin' Hopkins.

But yeah, 8-bar is the other biggie. Think of "Sittin' On Top of The World" and its variations (or predecessors, I guess), that's 8-bar.

Most gospel is eight-bar.

Broheems (diamond), Friday, 9 April 2004 20:07 (twenty-two years ago)

in fact, if there are any hardcore Smithsonsian-types out there who will send me a tape, I can dub some tapes of Gramp's stuff along these lines. He used to play with Chet Atkins and give guitar lessons in N.C, and played in dancehall bands in the 30s. Whenver I go home to visit I turn on a tape recorder in front of him and say, ok play me what you used to play. He calls it Delta Blues, and Hill Music.

Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 9 April 2004 20:31 (twenty-two years ago)

delta blues (mostly southern mississippi) = 12 bar with some extemporaneous fills

hill country blues (mostly northern mississippi) = 1 or 2 chord drony blues stomp

there is a pretty wide difference in how these styles are performed.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 9 April 2004 20:34 (twenty-two years ago)

he plays actually 3 kinds-- the other is Hillbilly Music, which I believe is his word for Country Gospel. Not much of it is 12-bar, the style(s) (are)/is different.

Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 9 April 2004 20:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Julio, do you have the Rolling Stones album Sticky Fingers? "You Gotta Move" on there - an old Rev Gary Davis/Mississippi Fred McDowell thing - is an 8-bar number.

Broheems (diamond), Friday, 9 April 2004 20:44 (twenty-two years ago)

broheems- no, I don't have that rolling stones alb but thanks to everyone for the discussion and recommendations.

I don't actually have much blues (actually only heard howlin' wolf and a chess comp), and never got round to checking much more of it, quite diff to get a handle on the form for some reason, but I'm always looking at ways to get into it bcz its in so many things I love.

I'll actually go back to the book and try and look that quote bcz it was some specific bar range.

orbit and gygax!- any good comps out there with this stuff?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 9 April 2004 21:36 (twenty-two years ago)

I've always been more of a folk and country fan, and found my way into the blues through Mississippi John Hurt.

southern lights (southern lights), Friday, 9 April 2004 22:38 (twenty-two years ago)

if you are looking for unorthodox blues compilations, this is one of my faves:

http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&uid=UIDMISS70404071016000126&sql=Anwz8b5m49sqs

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 9 April 2004 22:52 (twenty-two years ago)

John Hurt is no doubt one of the classics. It was really the Harry Smith "Anthology" that turned me on to the blues for the first time. Via the earlier acoustic blues, I found my way into the Chicago electric blues, which I'd always had an unnatural aversion to. I had no idea what I was missing.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 9 April 2004 23:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Tones: Amiable/Good-Natured

Mark (MarkR), Saturday, 10 April 2004 12:12 (twenty-two years ago)

wasnt charley patton like black/jewish/irish or something crazy like that?

mick jaggers performance on "you gotta move" is almost obscene. i bet he had blackface on in the studio...when you get into reverend gary davis its usually much closer to a ragtime type thing. its hard to draw lines for any sort of folk music.

nate, the exact same thing happened to me. for the longest time id say "i dont like chicago blues, just the prewar stuff" but now i get it. thank god for the anthology. i was just thinking of blueshammer type stuff i think. mississippi john hurt is a real charmer. im in love with him.

this is the part when i say son house is a motherfucking maniac.

tom cleveland (tom cleveland), Saturday, 10 April 2004 13:43 (twenty-two years ago)

that looks good gygax!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 10 April 2004 15:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Very informative post...if I read you correctly "Mannish Boy" doesn't follow blues chord structure or blues lyrical structure (both of which seem obvious) so what makes it blues, then?

Mark--

Well, it certainly is a blues. The riff implies what a more stretched-out "bar" structure would make more explicit. You could say it's a two-bar blues, actually.

I have big problems with most discussions of blues. Someone above mentions Skip James, whose best work isn't exactly blues. "I'm So Glad" is one of the most amazing things ever recorded, and what in the hell is it? It anticipates so many things--Beefheart, the Byrds...you name it. On the other hand, "Devil Got My Woman" is certainly pretty much a standard blues.

The other thing I like to remember is that early blues and "ragtimey" chord progressions were sort of married. The guys from the Carolinas and Georgia were more in the vein of that slightly more complex rag thing...the riff-based and somewhat, these days, hackneyed style came about a bit later and you can hear it in the great Howlin' Wolf recordings of the early '50s, with Willie Johnson on guitar. Muddy Waters basically invented the stop-time riff style exemplifed on "Mannish Boy." This is where the Kinks and the Who and, name them, got their shit from. "You Really Got Me" is such a great example of this. What people call "modalism" enters into it during the Brit Invasion, just listen to "Tired of Waiting" for ex. That seemed to be in the air around 1960 and you can hear it in things as diverse and as seemingly far the "the blues" as "Kind of Blue" and the cool little coda of Jobim's "Desafinado." Same thing with George Harrison's "If I Needed Someone." The interesting thing in my opinion is that the kind of perhaps unintentional modalism found in those recordings was implied by men like Furry Lewis, who never truly went to the IV chord, but who played it like a suspended fourth. I have seen Mississippi blues players do exactly that; it's a "mistake" since it violates the blues structure (on a piano, play a blues in E and then instead of going to the IV just keep the E in the bass and play A and B, you'll hear what I'm talking about, or listen to Furry Lewis play "I Will Turn Your Money Green" and you can hear it, an unintentional but affecting effect.

Basically, I think the key to blues is not the structure, which is surely important, but the velocity and the drive. When people go on about dropping bars and the 13 1/2 bar blues, they're talking about a way of hitting it that comes from a desire to rock out...velocity and timing. It's such a flexible structure that you can do almost anything with it. Somehow or another Latin rhythms enter into this; the stuff I really like post-war often has a backwards or turning-in-on-itself quality that comes from a fucked-up approach to what are diluted Latin rhythms. In New Orleans you have the tango and cha-cha happening too and that's what gives it its remarkable lightness. I'm thinking of things like Benny Spellman's "You Got to Get It' and Earl King's "Trick Bag." Which are "blues" but with a tightened-up quality that make recordings like these the bridge between "blues" and funk. Or even Elmore James on "Rollin' and Tumblin," a one-chord blues that swings like drunken Latin music.

I myself like the Stones doing "You Got to Move." It's authentic in its own way and it moves me. I'm a big proponent of the whole Memphis approach to all this, there's a certain obliquity and a certain desire to fuck things up, what I've heard referred to as "the twist," as in twisting people's heads around, a hard, dry approach, that for me is what the blues is all about. And Van Vliet and his band certainly do something similar in the awesome "Click Clack" from '71, where they play a Wolf-style blues in 3, very simple but hard to catch until you just pat your foot, then it's so obvious.

Sorry to ramble, but I'm working on some writing about this very thing...

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Saturday, 10 April 2004 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)

don't apologize for the ramblin' ed. I actually got 3 discs off the beefheart boxset, so I actually get that bit abt 'click clack' (esp easy to 'get' in the live version of it on disc 5).

Quite a few tracks to check out from yr post.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 10 April 2004 15:37 (twenty-two years ago)

dunno Julio, I'd be glad to explore some unorthodox comps myself. I've come at this all backwards, from hearing old coots play unrecorded music in the swamp. ;-)
i'll check out the comp gygax suggested also.

Orbit (Orbit), Saturday, 10 April 2004 23:48 (twenty-two years ago)

three years pass...

Been stuck on Elder Curry's "Memphis Flu" lately. Uptempo 15-bar gospel-blues recorded in 1930.

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 01:57 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.