― x Jeremy (Atila the Honeybun), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― peepee (peepee), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― 0r4l R0b3rt5 (ex machina), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:48 (twenty-two years ago)
Err...try 30something.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― x Jeremy (Atila the Honeybun), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― peepee (peepee), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― peepee (peepee), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:52 (twenty-two years ago)
"Mr. Blue Sky" or "12XU"?
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― peepee (peepee), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― x Jeremy (Atila the Honeybun), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― peepee (peepee), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― x Jeremy (Atila the Honeybun), Thursday, 17 June 2004 01:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― 0r4l R0b3rt5 (ex machina), Thursday, 17 June 2004 02:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 17 June 2004 02:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― peepee (peepee), Thursday, 17 June 2004 02:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― x Jeremy (Atila the Honeybun), Thursday, 17 June 2004 02:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Begs2Differ (Begs2Differ), Thursday, 17 June 2004 02:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 17 June 2004 02:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― x Jeremy (Atila the Honeybun), Thursday, 17 June 2004 02:14 (twenty-two years ago)
Now if the question was which band is better, Wire wins.
― jack cole (jackcole), Thursday, 17 June 2004 02:15 (twenty-two years ago)
"Influence in the broadest sense. Which, as I meant it, is Universal Influence. Influence not just to the music-savvy, I mean to say."
well if your talking sheer economics, ELO wins.
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 17 June 2004 02:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― christhamrin (christhamrin), Thursday, 17 June 2004 03:23 (twenty-two years ago)
besides, wire is just an elastica rip off
― 0r4l R0b3rt5 (ex machina), Thursday, 17 June 2004 03:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 17 June 2004 04:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― christhamrin (christhamrin), Thursday, 17 June 2004 04:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 17 June 2004 04:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 17 June 2004 04:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Thursday, 17 June 2004 04:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lo Boob Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 17 June 2004 04:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lo Boob Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 17 June 2004 04:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 17 June 2004 04:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 17 June 2004 05:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 17 June 2004 05:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 17 June 2004 05:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 17 June 2004 05:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 17 June 2004 05:24 (twenty-two years ago)
(If it's any consolation, I'd much rather hear Wire's originals than REM's and Minor Threat's covers!)
― Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Thursday, 17 June 2004 06:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark e (mark e), Thursday, 17 June 2004 08:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 17 June 2004 08:25 (twenty-two years ago)
Hmmmm. Doesn't being an influence to "the music savvy" mean that it's more likely that your influence will be fertile and ultimately be disseminated further (albeit in a somewhat diluted form)?
Who has more influence? A band that may have been heard playing in the background by 10,000 people while they were driving the car / at work / doing the housework; or a band that's listened to intently by 100 people, all of whom go off and form bands, all of which are listened to intently by 100 more people, all of whom go off and form bands....
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 17 June 2004 08:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 17 June 2004 08:46 (twenty-two years ago)
Yes, my mum and most of the people I'm sitting with 20ft of at the moment are more likely to have heard of ELO but, then, they're also more likely to have heard of the Lighthouse Family.
If you're talking cultural impact in terms of bums-on-seats, then clearly it ELO. In terms of worthwhile cultural impact, meaningful influence, I'm saying Wire every time.
― coco, Thursday, 17 June 2004 08:56 (twenty-two years ago)
And how many are influenced by The Stranglers and mention The Wire instead?
― Diego Valladolid (dvalladt), Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Diego Valladolid (dvalladt), Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:23 (twenty-two years ago)
I wasn't seeking to knock the car as a listening post by any means - only to distinguish between the passive "heard" and the active "listened to".
The Wire? That's a magazine that's read by "the music savvy" (as opposed to e.g. Q, which is a magazine that's looked at by loads of people) isn't it?
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:24 (twenty-two years ago)
Meaningful to whom? Worthwhile to whom? "Living Thing" happens to move me very deeply, y'know. What wondrous things have come from Wire that are so amazing? There have been some very good singles in the last few years that have ripped off ELO, as it happens.
― edward o (edwardo), Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:39 (twenty-two years ago)
i don't find this talk of 'influence' and 'cultural importance' particularly edifying. also this serious/silly opposition doesn't hold up because wire were a great pop band and very funny too.
― pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:54 (twenty-two years ago)
Then someone says that Wire had far more far-reaching influence because lots of their acolytes started bands.
But how many of them were noteworthy? ELO's influence is probably just as pervasive, it just boils down to who notices what. The same people that dug Wire over ELO probably prefer the bands who were influenced by Wire and vice versa. Therefore, that's pretty much a stalemate isn't it, even if, as Pete says, it's HARDLY A GREAT WAY OF MEASURING ANYTHING TO BEGIN WITH.
Therefore, ELO must win by virtue of the fact that many, many more people alive today can sing "Xanadu" or "Don't Bring Me Down" than "Three Girl Rhumba".
(P.S. I do like the 70s Wire singles!)
― edward o (edwardo), Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― edward o (edwardo), Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:56 (twenty-two years ago)
I disagree entirely - the vocals / melodies on Xanadu and Don't Bring Me Down are fairly complicated and pitched far too high for the average adult male to be able to sing confortably without straining or screeching.
Three Girl Rhumba by comparison only uses three or four notes, is all sung in one key, pitched comfortably for most people and would be an absolute piece of piss for them to sing.
If only they knew the words.
Or the tune.
Or had ever even heard it before.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 17 June 2004 11:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― edward o (edwardo), Thursday, 17 June 2004 11:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― 0r4l R0b3rt5 (ex machina), Thursday, 17 June 2004 11:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 17 June 2004 11:43 (twenty-two years ago)
Think of a number Divide it by two remember the number another a number
(do not alter the note you chant the above, there you are nearly halfway there)...
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 17 June 2004 11:44 (twenty-two years ago)
Another heart has made the tradeForget it, forget it, forget itI don't understand how a heart is a spadeBut somehow the vital connection is made
Riding on anythingAnything's good enoughWho would've thought it of someone like youJust as they brought me roundNow that they brought you downRoundabout and roundaboutWho wants a life anyway?
Another heart has made the gradeForget it, forget it, forget itI don't understand how the last card is playedBut somehow the vital connection is made
― 0r4l R0b3rt5 (ex machina), Thursday, 17 June 2004 11:45 (twenty-two years ago)
I've never held with quantity being any sort of signifier whatsoever regarding quality.... I was being a bit of a devil's advocate.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 17 June 2004 11:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 17 June 2004 11:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― edward o (edwardo), Thursday, 17 June 2004 11:49 (twenty-two years ago)
There isn't actually a vast amount of difference to be honest, is there?
Hence far more people alive today would be able to make a reasonable approximation of that one than would be able to sing something as exacting as "Xanadu" or "Don't Bring Me Down"....
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 17 June 2004 11:52 (twenty-two years ago)
The number of people who've heard "Xanadu" or "Don't Bring Me Down" will clearly be enormously larger than the number who've heard "Three Girl Rhumba"; consequently in absolute terms the number of people who "Xanadu" or "Don't Bring Me Down" has "stayed with" will almost certainly also be larger.
Please note however, that this does not prove anything.
More people have trodden in dog shit than have won the jackpot on the National Lottery; this doesn't mean people prefer treading in dog shit, it just means that there's far more of it about.
No, I am not attempting to call ELO dogshit, merely to make an allusion.
What you'd actually need to test this would be a comparison between an empirical measure of how much each song has "stayed with" a statistically balanced sample of the people who've heard it, as a proportion of the relevant sample size for each song.
Before you ask, I have absolutely no idea how you might go about establishing "an empirical measure of how much each song has "stayed with" a statistically balanced sample of the people who've heard it".
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― edward o (edwardo), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― edward o (edwardo), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:13 (twenty-two years ago)
x-post - great minds!
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― edward o (edwardo), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:21 (twenty-two years ago)
Mark Grout *thinks* "Shall mention a placebo in a clinical trial and see who makes reference to Brian Molko......"
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:23 (twenty-two years ago)
To me. That's what I said.
I, personally, couldn't give a toss if I ever heard another ELO tune in my puff, whereas I find Wire endlessly interesting and stimulating, from Pink Flag (although not quite so much Pink Flag) through to Send. So, for me they have the greater cultural impact.
For you, it's ELO. Not everyone has the same cultural reference points.
― coco, Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― edward o (edwardo), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)
coco? puff? how sweet!
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:26 (twenty-two years ago)
Very true - and perhaps more importantly, not everyone has the same goals.
If Wire were trying to achieve an extremely commercially viable and lucrative fusion between pop, prog. and classical music, then they failed abysmally.
ELO, on the other hand, would have been bottled off the stage if they'd appeared at The Roxy in 1977.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― coco, Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)
(caveat: I was not there...)
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― coco, Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:47 (twenty-two years ago)
caveat: not until 1978, and not when Wire were playing.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 17 June 2004 12:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Begs2Differ (Begs2Differ), Thursday, 17 June 2004 13:05 (twenty-two years ago)
Stence OTM!
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 17 June 2004 13:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 17 June 2004 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 17 June 2004 14:43 (twenty-two years ago)