What The Hell Is "Rock-Swing"? Is The New York Times Making Up Words Again?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
"Big hits like the camp opera "Bohemian Rhapsody" and the rock-swing "Crazy Little Thing Called Love" seemed uniquely suited to Mercury, who carried them with just the proper mix of kitsch and bluster."

Is it a mix of rock and swing band-era jazz? Did he just mean "swinging rock"? was he gonna write rock/swing, but forgot? Is it a new genre that I don't know about? Or an old one? There was nothing on google. As a song, it swings pretty good. Isn't it just ersatz rockabilly? (one of my favorite genres, by the way.) a rock-swing sounds uncomfortable.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 September 2005 15:54 (twenty years ago)

I'm afraid this might have something to do with this dude

http://www.usaweekend.com/99_issues/990321/images/setzerbrian.jpg

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 September 2005 16:13 (twenty years ago)

I always thought "Crazy Little Thing..." was just an incredibly fey rockabilly ripoff.

pdf (Phil Freeman), Sunday, 25 September 2005 16:16 (twenty years ago)

He meant "rock-schwing," but it was changed in a copy editor error.

Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Sunday, 25 September 2005 16:26 (twenty years ago)

Lots of rock and roll has a swing-style beat (or shuffle, or boogie, or whatever you want to call it). I've never heard it referred to as "swing-rock" before, but I knew right away what the guy meant so I don't see it as particularly offensive.

Hurting (Hurting), Sunday, 25 September 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)

Though I guess in a way it's kind of redundant, since the rock and roll beat evolved out of the swing beat, and since SO MUCH early rock and roll had a swing beat.

Hurting (Hurting), Sunday, 25 September 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)

no, this guy just forgot about rockabilly

Dominique (dleone), Sunday, 25 September 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)

see, i would have had no problem with "and the rock swing of..."

i've had enough coffee now though. i'm all better.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 September 2005 17:18 (twenty years ago)

As usual, the New York Sunday Times ...

This article is ostensibly a lash-up on classic rock bands who have substituted news singers for their salad days voice. Before the runover they get things wrong. "Creedence Clearwater Revival" isn't CCR, it's Creedence Clearwater Revisited, and it's obvious to anyone who follows CCR or who has seen the CCRev CDs in stores. And they're not "recent" which is what the Times writes.

They also cite Van Halen. Ahem.

FUBAR as usual going on about Van Halen and Gary Cherone and, this, in the caption for the big pic for the story: "...Mr. Hagar has returned..."

But this from Sept 3 or so, from Blabbermouth:

Classic Rock Revisited: Is VAN HALEN done?

Sammy Hagar: "I don't know. It is right now. They can do whatever they want. If Ed and Al want to get a new singer and a new bass player then they can do whatever they want. I wouldn't complain and I wouldn't say that they shouldn't have done that. What I would say is that I think it is a big mistake to do that. I would never try to run their lives like they do me. They are free to do whatever they want. The way they want to do business and the way they want to mingle with their co-band members and other people who are involved in their organization, I don't want any part of.
======

George the Animal Steele, Sunday, 25 September 2005 18:04 (twenty years ago)

So we're one step closer to "Rock Star: Van Halen", then?

mark 0 (mark 0), Sunday, 25 September 2005 20:00 (twenty years ago)

Hard to tell. The New York Times piece, as per its usual dealing with things even remotely hard rock, was for dumb people who fancy themselves Sundary deep thinkers, I guess. How do you fuck up the news on Van Halen at a newspaper with so many layers of cream-o-the-crop editors?

George the Animal Steele, Sunday, 25 September 2005 20:13 (twenty years ago)

Threadstarter, do ye not recall the swing/ska craze at the turn of the century? esp after the movie Swingers came out, and even my co-worker, who looked just like Jerry Garcia '74, saw it and showed up the next day with Sinatroid caesar-cut and goatee, and I knew o shit.

don, Sunday, 25 September 2005 20:15 (twenty years ago)

*shudder*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 25 September 2005 20:16 (twenty years ago)

Didn't Bill Haley and the Comets start out as a swing band?

And there's always Jive Bunny and the Mixmasters or whatever they were called.

But really rock swing = Louis Prima (or, where Van Halen is concerned, maybe David Lee Roth covering Louis Prima?) (Or maybe the Glen Miller quotes inside Charlie Daniels's "the South's Gonna Do it Again"?) (Or maybe, yeah, Royal Crown Revue and Cherry Poppin Daddies, yikes)

xhuxk, Sunday, 25 September 2005 20:20 (twenty years ago)

bill haley swings the hell out of me. that stuff is the best. so does all the greasy boogie woogie that love. boogie woogie is definitely rock-swing.

here is the track-listing of the no-name boogie woogie comp that i have been listening to lately:



pine top smith - pinetop's boogie woogie

cripple clarence lofton - had a dream

joe sullivan - boogie woogie maxixe

meade lux lewis - honky tonk train

art hodes - ross tavern boogie

louis jordan - choo choo chi boogie

red nelson - streamlined train

honey hill - boogie woogie

pete johnson - shuffle boogie

art hodes - south side shuffle

albert ammons - mecca flat blues

bob zurke - gin mill blues

albert ammons - woo woo

freddie slack - down the road a piece

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 September 2005 20:38 (twenty years ago)

In any case, I don't think "Crazy Little Thing Called Love" swings very well at all.

Hurting (Hurting), Sunday, 25 September 2005 20:43 (twenty years ago)

and there's also country boogie woogie (i.e. post western swing/pre rockabilly) stuff like moon mullican, tennesse ernie ford, etc

xhuxk, Sunday, 25 September 2005 21:18 (twenty years ago)

The best description of the early rock'n'roll beat I ever read was in an interview with Little Richard's drummer (Charles Connors, I think), who talked about how Richard insisted on playing straight-8's on the piano, even though the rest of the band was playing a swing-shuffle. So the tension between the piano and the rest of the band was what put the rock in the roll. Anyway, made sense to me, and it also explained why no band I ever played with was ever able to get "Tutti Frutti" right, because we'd either play it straight or swung but never both at once.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 25 September 2005 21:24 (twenty years ago)

otm. And another tension is the way he seems to be planting his feet, standing his ground amidst the swingoogie (which I luv, don't get me wrong), and then stretching his voice waaaay up and out, cat. (Like Fogerty in Creedence sometimes, like metal would)(also like other singers who knew they had to do that to penetrate the din of murk in most live gigs back then)

don, Monday, 26 September 2005 03:53 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.