so what went wrong with grime blowing up?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
as i listen to roll deeps creeper mix tape the reason dawned on me - like most uk rappers uk hip hop or otherwise, most of the MCing has got energy but its not too hot is it? no one outside the little grime enclave is gonna be rating these guys as good MCs and part of that is cos theyre badly recorded, cant rap on beat properly, cant stick to the track on time, shout all the time, they dont know how to record in a studio properly or make tunes and it sounds a bit stupid really. energy can only compensate for so much... but compare these guys to the best in dancehall or hip hop and they dont really fare too well...

im more enlightened about grime then when i first came to ilx and i do like a lot of it but a lot of it is too beginnerish for me and yeah you can say 'its not for you' to me but then youve got to think that with so many people not really getting into it outside of its little scene, why is that? im not really all that into dubstep, too stiff, but i think it might have more of a chance to make it cos its still dance -styled music, its not all about the rappers, which grime is. and yeah alright, theres been some wicked Mcs come out of grime, but not THAT many, and really, most people are never gonna buy into UK rap whether its grime or the boring old school thing that uk hip hop does just cos american hip hop has such a big presence. grime had more of a chance of making it as dance music at least before it went up its own 'harder than hard' darkside arse.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 15:44 (twenty years ago)

british accents don't sell in the states unless they're coming from californians in eyeliner.

senseiDancer (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 15:48 (twenty years ago)

didnt sell too well in scunthorpe either

charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 15:49 (twenty years ago)

i dunno, basically, i think the transition from ukg to grime was never going to yield any commerical success. it was kind of amazing that dizzee managed what he did. but his type of success was archetypal single artist success, not scene crossover

charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 15:54 (twenty years ago)

Apart from Slick Rick and dude who played Stringer Bell in The Wire all blacks from britain are worthless sub-humans who should never attempt anything even hip hop related.

CRIME IS MONEY AND MONEY IS CRIME, Tuesday, 14 March 2006 15:58 (twenty years ago)

more people talking about why it wasn't going to blow up in the states than listening to it in its home country maybe?

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 15:58 (twenty years ago)

didnt sell all too well in london either. it does have a following, yeah, but some people were so desperate for a real uk hip hop sound they would get behind anything that seemed like it might be that.

i heard that when rinse fm booked ministry of sound they couldnt even fill out both floors.

when jungle came out people said it wouldnt travel past london but grime cant seem to even get past east london.

basically any uk artists trying to make their version of hip hop are always gonna be fucked in some way unless youre really special and say what you want but grime artists were trying to make their version of hip hop but all they had was energy which is great for raves but thats about it - like, i listen to old pirate radio rips and theres some amazing stuff there but the amount of rubbish MCs is ridiculous, theres only a few properly good MCs in the scene

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 15:59 (twenty years ago)

Grime's main problem was surely being marketed straight away to the hipster press before it made any attempt at the mainstream or even a wide-ranging underground popularity? You may as well ask why Selfish Cunt haven't had a top ten single yet.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:08 (twenty years ago)

Also, I'm wondering if a) inability to really do anything useful off the mixtape routine (as opposed to, say, Sway) or b) rushing themselves into making a chart assault (as opposed to, say, Klashnekoff) may not have helped them either.

Thirdly: RAP MUSIC DOESN'T SELL IN THE UK. If Lil Jon can't go top 50, what chance does MC Skribbledeedoo have?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:09 (twenty years ago)

like, i listen to old pirate radio rips and theres some amazing stuff there

definitely! thats the thing though, as an adjunct it was fine, but when mcing became the focus, well, it wasnt enough!

charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:10 (twenty years ago)

Thirdly: RAP MUSIC DOESN'T SELL IN THE UK.

oh really?

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:12 (twenty years ago)

eskimo dances were pretty popular back in the day, as were sidewinders as far as i know. yr example of rinse not filling the Misery is a bit disingenuous, when was this for example?

I think in London grime is/was popular but traditional means of monitoring this (eg sales of ....) didnt track it. attendance at raves back then (2002-04/5?*) is prob a better indication


* when was the last eskimo dance in london @ SE1?

talking of grime raves, are any still going?
Rep yr Manor in Bedford?
Young Man Standing?
Sidewinder?
Eskimo Dance happened in Watford again a coupla weeks back?

ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:20 (twenty years ago)

Outside of Eminem, Kanye, Fifty, and BEP, which rappers actually sell in the UK? I mean, when it gets to the point where the last The Game single was outsold by a reggae song by the former lead singer of the Boo Radleys... you may start questioning raps nascient popularity in the UK.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:22 (twenty years ago)

rap doesn't sell as many singles as it used to, but it would be wrong to say it wasn't popular.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:27 (twenty years ago)

record sales are only one measure though. i mean, how many rave singles went top 40? edge*1 was massive, but wasnt actually ever properly released. acid house didnt really bother the charts much, but it certainly bothered the press, and most A roads across southern england. jungle didnt see many singles either, but was ubiqutuous (perhaps slightly more so in london than elsewhere)

charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:31 (twenty years ago)

how many rave singles went top 40?

quite a lot, iirc.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:38 (twenty years ago)

there are provincial hip-hop nights, for example, but have there been any grime nights outside of london?

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:39 (twenty years ago)

i mean, how many rave singles went top 40?

a lot more than Grime-related stuff really. Nothing harder than 'Some Justice' - but really, how on earth DID that get in the top 40 itself? Lots of dents in the top 100 for acts like Manix too (if anyone still published the top 100 online it might be easier to guage success of Grime singles as I'm sure some must dent top 100 even now). Rave saw tiny labels like Sub Base get top 40 hits with relative ease (no real airplay not even on Kiss). Totally different climate today, everything so marginalised and niche.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:40 (twenty years ago)

But that's the thing though, because the charts are so marginalized these days and you can easily have a top 20 single off the back of a solid fanbase and scene, it should be *easier* for stuff like grime to get in the charts, not harder.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:50 (twenty years ago)

yes, im saying that acid house, rave, jungle, were all exponentially huger than grime

but, im also saying, you wouldnt grasp the scope of their popularity, if you were to judge by sales figures alone

charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:51 (twenty years ago)

skepta and jammer appear to spedn their days travelling up the m1 at the mo, so yes there is grime outside of london. but not in the enormous rave format of the old days

ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:51 (twenty years ago)

Do you think there is any way to accurately gauge the respectively popularity of scenes, Gareth?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:51 (twenty years ago)

have there been any grime nights outside of london?

http://www.djgomes.nl/pictures_news/OI_FLYER.jpg

JoB (JoB), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:53 (twenty years ago)

i heard san francisco has a lot of grime nights!

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:58 (twenty years ago)

Yeah there have been a couple here (of varying success.) New York has had a bunch.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 17:03 (twenty years ago)

Wiley is doing an Eskimo Dance in Swansea next month apparently. For real

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 17:05 (twenty years ago)

Grime's main problem was surely being marketed straight away to the hipster press before it made any attempt at the mainstream or even a wide-ranging underground popularity?

dom, what does that even mean?

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 17:06 (twenty years ago)

so what went wrong with grime blowing up?

most of it just wasn't very good

latebloomer aka rembrandt, the fifth ninja turtle (latebloomer), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 17:23 (twenty years ago)

dom, what does that even mean?

He's saying ppl who read certain music mags got to hear it but top40 listeners and the streetz didn't. I think.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:08 (twenty years ago)

Pretty much, yeah. Grime always seemed to be marketed more at Wallpaper than CD:UK, so you can't really complain when its sales figures reflect that.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:09 (twenty years ago)

"You had a shit scene and the whole thing died." - Audio Bullys '06

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:13 (twenty years ago)

Do you think there is any way to accurately gauge the respectively popularity of scenes, Gareth?

the only way is through SCIENCE!! (i.e. talkin to people and gettin a feel for it.)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:16 (twenty years ago)

"You had a shit scene and the whole thing died." - Audio Bullys '06
Pot. Kettle. Black.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:17 (twenty years ago)

maybe someone will invent a scene-o-meter

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:18 (twenty years ago)

"You had a shit scene and the whole thing died.then you sampled Nancy Sinatra"

Fixed.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:21 (twenty years ago)

You could halve the database load on ILM if you wrote a script that deleted threads in which the words "grime" and "bhangra" appeared between 2002 and 2005.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:23 (twenty years ago)

(or)

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:24 (twenty years ago)

actually, no.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:26 (twenty years ago)

Perhaps not but the world would be a better place...

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:34 (twenty years ago)

not so much.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:34 (twenty years ago)

You could do with retiring that phrase, as well. It's so 2001. Worse than "the new x." You don't actually write anywhere, do you?

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:36 (twenty years ago)

Are you still generously referring to what you do as "writing", Chris?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:40 (twenty years ago)

http://www.newhomesource.com/Content/images/Tstat.jpg

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:41 (twenty years ago)

so what went wrong with grime blowing up?

It fucking sucked. NME hypes aside, the UK public is not stupid. And they're not gonna make grime popular if it ain't any good!!

Thirdly: RAP MUSIC DOESN'T SELL IN THE UK.

oh really?

Dude, the first rap album to hit number one on the UK charts was NOT It Takes a Nation, it was NOT Fear of a Black Planet, it was NOT Straight Outta Compton, it was NOT Niggaz4life, it was NOT The Chronic, it was NOT Doggystyle, it wasn't even Please Hammer Don't Hurt 'Em or To the Extreme!

Nope, the UK had to wait until Nineteen-ninety-flippin'-seven and Wu-Tang Forever to get a #1 rap album under their belts!

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:47 (twenty years ago)

Wait. I just contradicted myself.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:48 (twenty years ago)

yeah plus titchy already suggested the MCing is weak, maybe you could offer something a little more specific than "it fucking sucked" which isn't even true anyway

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:50 (twenty years ago)

Nope, the UK had to wait until Nineteen-ninety-flippin'-seven and Wu-Tang Forever to get a #1 rap album under their belts!

And then the Wu became one of only two acts ever (the other being Doves) to have an album go to #1, and then fall out of the top ten the next week.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 18:53 (twenty years ago)

The years since 2002 are a litany of fuck ups and missed opportunities.

Not enough club tracks being produced, by which i mean singles that will appeal to DJ's that aren't exclusively grime. Too many MC's (especially shit ones) compared to the number of labels, DJ's and producers. The raves all got locked off in London which killed a lot of the scene's momentum as a live thing. Too many hype kids involved (although who knows, this could be the music's saving grace in a few years if they stick with it and get better). Those crappy albums that got released. Very few pirates now willing to host grime shows that once did, deja, freeze etc...

captain easychord (captain easychord), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 19:05 (twenty years ago)

hey ott, still stewing b/c buddyboy got in trouble for making shit up? or just acting like a hostile dick for the hell of it?

anyway my feeling is that it tried too hard to be the "new rap". all the "energy" stuff that ts was talking about was more than that -- there was some fantastic talent on the old live mixes and soforth that i've been listening to lately (granted, from the usual suspects, but it doesn't take much more than a handful of good artists to "make" a scene anyway) but the borrowed affectations dragged it down too much and made a neither here nor there hybrid. also, the beats slowed down quite a bit as the MCs then had to also -- which made them *worse* because it actually killed some of that improvisatory doubletime work that the MCs could do before (i.e. "energy").

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 19:40 (twenty years ago)

the other thing not in grimes favour, which might be more important is that a lot of the tracks werent produced all that well. maybe that doesnt matter so much cos when you play anything on a big sound system its gonna sound better/half decent anyway but a lot of the tracks just sound too fruity loopsish, which is fine i suppose if youre a big US hip hop act who can go into a good studio with it but if youre aiming for that sound and you dont have that facility, your beats are gonna sound 'small' which is the main problem a lot of uk hip hop has too, it doesnt sound larger than life, the sonics are relatively 'twee'. plus even when the tunes arent properly produced and still sound cheapo in the US, there is a massive budget behind them and a big marketing push so nobody gives a shit. but aside from that technical aspect, id wager that a lot of the beats were just not too hot in terms of the 'content'. i think people thought somthing similar around the hardcore rave period, that lot of tunes just sounded like nth generation rehashes of other tunes (eg - that young dot tune bazooka sounds like a million other grime tunes bunched up into one) and thats what grime sounds like, a lot of the producers cant play for shit and well, it shows.

plus, yeah, as sterling says, it took itself too seriously as 'the uks version of hip hop'. when the beats started getting slow, and the mcs followed suit and started thinking they werent rave mcs but hip hop style ones (ie took themselves seriously), it went tits up. and all that OTT post-fwd riddim style aggression is fucking ludicrous and as false as all the punks in the late 70s putting attitude on. no one is going to believe that, esp not in england. and re: improv, even in 2006, most of these guys cant make 'songs' like hiphop artists can which kinda kills the 'rave mc----> artist progression' they were all aiming for in dizzee's wake. in fact, i blame all that on wiley stressing the importance of being an 'artist' as eveyone else tried to do the same thing, and they were all, wiley included, just not as good at it as dizzee despite wanting to be that so badly. they tried to be 'the new rap' instead of just being their own thing which is what they were, even in the days of lady stush, pay as u go, more fire etc. matter of fact, i prefer so solid to half the new crews, at last it sounds totally diff to hip hop!

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 19:49 (twenty years ago)

I dunno, I think it's the wrong perspective to take on grime as a scene to ever expect it to be massive in a national or even international way. I mean what characterises the music above all is its local-ness - the specificity of the slang and the references and the pettyness of the beefs/clashes.

It's a bit more like US emo/hardcore that way - you'd almost expect loads of little local scenes with their own local heroes to pop up. These days now that hip hop has got so far from its DiY roots, grime steps up to that plate really well. All you need is fruity and some basic studio equipment - your mc doesn't even need proper songs (hi dere JME).

But given that local flavour it's also no wonder a lot of it doesn't travel per se - the energy comes from communication between artists and listeners and the lack of much of a gap between the two. Transplant performers to Japan and you lose all of that, and are left with dance music that it's pretty hard to dance with.

Also hip hop moves pretty slowly in incorporating new influences. Think how long crunk and screw sounds were big for in their locales before they went national and global. Or even the limited recent success of Carioca Funk and that's been developing for 15 years or so. It's really only because of the british sense of entitlement that people feel that this music should be massive after four years.

Jacob (Jacob), Wednesday, 15 March 2006 08:12 (twenty years ago)

im sorry, but not that 'localised' argument again... hip hop was local, but that travelled. baille funk is local but that sounds pretty damn great too. the southern rap stuff and screwed music has been on the scene for years, its only now getting mainstream props from people, and even that, at least to people into hip hop, has travelled all around the globe too. and lets not forget that other london music, jungle, that travelled pretty damn well too. so fuck the excuses, grime, like much uk hip hop, just isnt good enough.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 15 March 2006 15:59 (twenty years ago)

well you seem to have it all figured out.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Wednesday, 15 March 2006 16:47 (twenty years ago)

Did we really need another thread on this?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 15 March 2006 17:07 (twenty years ago)

titchyschneider, you seem to have some weird vendetta against grime, like you are totally bitter it isnt something or other, that it doesnt meet you expectations? why are youso angry about it? why cant grime just be shit, if thats what you think it is? who cares if it doesnt blow up, or if it blows down, or whatever. to me grime is ephemera incarnate, a whole genre built on fleeting moments, nothing ubilt to last, utter selfawareness that it wont last, that it is gonna end, that it is lacking in substance perhaps. constant bootlewgs of old tunes, mash ups, new tune rehashing old sounds from classics, mcs spitting the same lines etc. i dont know about those in the scenes perception but to me it isnt a music that will ever be big, nor is it meant to. theres no game plan, and if it snuffs out then so be it. who will keep track of what wiley will be doing in 5 years time? maybe no one. what will i do with all the white labels i bought? probably stick them at the back of my shelf.

to be honest, why grime didnt blow up (does that just mean, become popular nationally? internationally?) is that in essence, it is people shouting aggressively over often unpleasant noises. this is not popular music. "Oi" was the exception, not the rule. no matter how much media exposure it gets, it just isnt what the national audience want to hear. i think theres a few tunes that could have done ok, maybe "serious" for example "boys luv girls", and the r'n'g stuff could have done ok, but just chill out! its not going anywhere and dont worry about it! just carry on enjoying it till it disappears!

ambrose (ambrose), Wednesday, 15 March 2006 17:11 (twenty years ago)

ambrose otm. i don't know why, above all other genres, grime's popularity or lack of same is seen as indicative of its quality in so many quarters.

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 15 March 2006 17:44 (twenty years ago)

THEY BETTER START CLAP NOW

TINCHY STRYDER RHYMIN RITE NOW

WATCH DIS SPACE MAN

IT'S ALL REAL THESE DAYS

HOLD TIGHT THE WORLD

WE PLAN TO BREAK THRU TO THE OVER GROUND

coel canth (TINCHY STRYDER), Thursday, 16 March 2006 03:26 (twenty years ago)

ambrose otm. i don't know why, above all other genres, grime's popularity or lack of same is seen as indicative of its quality in so many quarters.
-- The Lex (alex.macpherso...), March 15th, 2006.

it's because grime's boosters don't talk exclusively about the music, isn't it? grime is important because it's real. but if no-one outside the scene and the blogosphere recognize their lives in it, grime isn't living up to the claims made for it.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Thursday, 16 March 2006 11:20 (twenty years ago)

what are those claims? no one outside the scene recognises their lives in it cos theres no MC Silverdollar (keep quiet Prancehall). Im confused, we seem to be mistaking outsiders claims about grime for the aims of those that produce it. its claim is that it reflects life on the street etc., if it makes any claim at all. i think it lives up toi that, not sure what else it needs to live up to.

i think the problem is that those boosting the scene from outside are making claims like "grime is amazing, its sonically incredible, energy blah blah blah etc." and then to other peoples ears, it doesnt live up to those claims. but it matters who is making those claims. i dont hear even wiley go on about how hes forged the next satge of the Continuum or whatever.

ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 16 March 2006 11:25 (twenty years ago)

its claim is that it reflects life on the street etc., if it makes any claim at all. i think it lives up to that, not sure what else it needs to live up to.

*every* music scene 'reflects' the conditions of its making though. if grime can't win listeners by being catchy, danceable, fun -- whatever makes pop pop -- neither has it won the argument in the more dubious terms of realness. maybe that doesn't matter at all, but if not then the level of discourse surrounding grime seems disproportionate to its interest.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Thursday, 16 March 2006 11:31 (twenty years ago)

bbbbut of course the level of discourse is disproportionate to its interest! thats the point! its not really of any interest to the general listening public, hence no big hits.

i dont see grime trying to "win" listeners, nor be pop. its true that in the last few years expectations have risen amongst producers etc that they might crossover, or sell lots of units rather, but the idea of how that might happen is not clear within the scene at all. but these expectations seem to have risen in the light of a) the fact that loads of people in the scene have been grafting or years and might expect some exposure or mainstream success after all that b) you might expect the (intense?) popularity of a music within a small area to be scaled up to a national level, especially if you dont have many opportunities to leave that area c) people from the guardian keep on interviewing them all, its a national newspaper ergo maybe theres national support.

but like i said these claims, expectations etc have been generated outside of the scene. insofar as grime is pretty introspective (eg random purple lyric - i want to tell my kids that the world is bigger than Acton(!!!)") its fair to say these claims are imposed to a large extent on those within the scene, rather than being made by them.

ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 16 March 2006 12:09 (twenty years ago)

c) people from the guardian keep on interviewing them all, its a national newspaper ergo maybe theres national support.

there's the rub. also the fact that the guardian's people act like acton is timbuktu.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Thursday, 16 March 2006 12:25 (twenty years ago)

the real reason for grime not blowing up is quite prosaic i think -
the vocal tunes were weak
the vocal tunes sounded more or less like hip hop
nobody in the UK really wants to hear british rappers and saw through all the hype and justifications about why its not hip hop etc etc etc
but still, nobody wanted to hear grime cos uk people dont really like uk rap (unless its live MCs at events or on radio, and even then, its arguable - a lot of people didnt really like the old rave Mcs either, apart from a few in particular)
plus, there was too much shit to wade through to get to the good stuff
so basically, grime = good as live thing on pirate radio, pretty good as a live thing in clubs, but not much at all as club/dance music or indeed recorded music, leaving it little options to survive.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 11:14 (twenty years ago)

Excellent. Glad we've got that sorted, then.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 11:23 (twenty years ago)

Titchy pretty well OTM there I'd say.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 11:24 (twenty years ago)

all that stuff about grime having a 'grassroots' audience was true to a point, i went to quite a few grime raves and concerts and things, but it was nowhere near enough to really warrant all that 'voice of the streets' stuff. the only people who were really saying that stuff repeatedly was hipsters, reynolds acolytes and the good people of the dissenus message board. but it was premature. this is a gross generalisation and i hate talking about 'the streets' as if theyre a monolith, but most people in 'the inner city' (TM) probably werent feeling grime as much as people might like to think cos most of it was filled with sad to say, transparent (and more importantly) not very good wannabe hip hop nonsense.

grimes future, IMHO, would be to stop all the 'uk rap' rubbish, stop trying to make these awful vocal tunes, and get back to making the MUSIC and the beats danceable again so it works as some sort of dance music (cos in spite of bad quality control, there are some great ideas from producers), and have the MCs as rave/club comperes. its never gonna work with the MCs as the main draws - theyre just not good enough. lots of energy and attitude, but not much else, for the most part. sorry if that makes me a hater or look like i have a vendetta against grime or whatever, i do like the music, really i do!

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 11:39 (twenty years ago)

grime does has a grassroots audience, mainly in inner city, deprived areas. this demographic do not form the majority of the record buying, gig (specifically gig) population, even more so outside of london.
thus grime doesnt have the success (record sales? airplay? tours?) some thought it might.

ambrose (ambrose), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 11:55 (twenty years ago)

but has it really taken over ALL of london? has it even 'taken over' the parts it does have some fans in? i dunno. its not really a problem for me either way, i dont have to know 'the streets' are into something to like it or not, im just addressing this point cos its what people always talk about. as if talking about the music isnt good enough, you have to talk about the 'authenticity' etc etc. but basically youre saying that all the core audience of grime does is listen to radio. they dont buy records, dont go to clubs, dont go to gigs, they just tape the radio (and DL mp3s). i can believe that. but i havent seen grime mixtapes being sold in brixton, in ladbroke grove, or in other places you might think its popular. maybe it IS popular there, who knows. i stick to what i said about the music itself though.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 12:01 (twenty years ago)

titchy do you find any other issue interesting? At all?

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 12:03 (twenty years ago)

there were some kids on my bus (again!) two evenings ago arguing over the quality or lack thereof of the latest bruza tune. well, it was the boys arguing, their girlfriends were looking quite unimpressed.

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 12:16 (twenty years ago)

in ladbroke grove they are too busy selling bugz in the attic mixtapes hehe

ambrose (ambrose), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 12:25 (twenty years ago)

lex neglects to mention that the 'kids' were westminster fifth-years.

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 12:36 (twenty years ago)

it would have been great if they had been!

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 12:41 (twenty years ago)

"titchy do you find any other issue interesting? At all?"

how do you mean? do i find anything apart from the fact grime hasnt blown up interesting about grime? or do you mean do i find anything apart from this topic interesting, full stop? either way, ill just say my most favourite grime release to date is probably rinsessions vol 1. i think the best thing davinche has done is his MIA remix. to be honest, my favourite grime things are the more technoid sounding things.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 12:56 (twenty years ago)

Haha.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 13:23 (twenty years ago)

Outside of Eminem, Kanye, Fifty, and BEP, which rappers actually sell in the UK?


Outside of (insert popular genre artist), which (insert other genre artists) actually sell in the UK?

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 13:28 (twenty years ago)

Outside of every contestant who appeared on the last series of The X-Factor, which X-Factor contestants actually sell in the UK?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 13:34 (twenty years ago)

xpost, in keeping with the bus anecdotes, i heard two guys discussing the talent (or lack of) of shizzle last week. and last year some kids were making their affectionate own versions of the pow chorus while laughing in trocadero.

has anyone seen the new albums chart show on channel 4 and the albums IN the top ten?

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 13:36 (twenty years ago)

not enough c4

latebloomer: band to the planet mars (latebloomer), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 13:42 (twenty years ago)

Mother's Day innit (xpost).

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 29 March 2006 13:43 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.