vancouver fag rag published this i wrote it about r kelly

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
As a gay man, I have always wondered how to work with hip hop. Until recently, I didn't like hip hop, mostly because of the homophobia. But its presence in the culture is a constant. Its rising from a minority tongue to a pop lingua franca has meant ignoring it almost means not being able to speak generationally.

Examples of how hip hop hates fags have abounded from the beginning. "Rapper's Delight" by the Sugarhill Gang, often called the first rap single, includes the lines: "Superman/ I said/ He's a fairy/ I do suppose/ Flyin' through the air in pantyhose."

The homophobia continued unabated. Public Enemy gave an interview to a London paper in 1988, saying, "There's no place for gays. When God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, it was for that sort of behaviour."

Common, an MC with equally progressive politics, cast derision on us a decade later. "In a circle of faggots your name is mentioned."

And I have yet to mention Ice Cube or Eminem's odes to fagbashing/murdering or 50 Cent's copious use of the six-letter F-word or Tupac's or Biggie's or even Jay Z's continued, systematic and explicit homo hatred.

I was sorting out the implications of this last year because I was worried my dislike of hip hop was a racist/white privilege thing.

But the homophobia kept coming up -- even though Kanye West told everyone to play nice, and I finally heard artists like Deep Dickollective, who released a CD in 2005 emblazoned with a moody portrait of James Baldwin and titled BourgieBohoPostPomoAfroHomo.

Then I discovered R Kelly's epic video and musical opus Trapped In The Closet and everything changed for me.

Kelly's creation solved one of the intractable problems of gay politics and hip hop, offering the queerest text ever charted in the genre (aside from Lil' Kim's psalm to oral pleasures, "How Many Licks," which is only queer because it's easily transferable.)

Kelly's opus got radio play. He debuted chapters of Trapped at the Grammys and the MTV Music Video Awards, and the whole thing sold millions and lasted for eons.

The songs and the corresponding videos lasted past the summer season, where most pop hits lived and died like mayflies. I danced to it in clubs, sang along to it on the radio and bought the DVD with all 12 chapters early in 2006.

For me, Kelly's opus is gay because it features two middle-class, Christian men desiring each other. But it's queer for its conflation of black and queer camp, plus its subversion of ubiquitous domestic melodrama.

Trapped In The Closet's interlinked music videos centre on a network of sex between common acquaintances.

It opens with Sylvester (played by Kelly) making love to Cathy until her husband Chuck unexpectedly comes home. Sylvester hides from Chuck in Cathy's closet.

Then Sylvester's cell phone rings, exposing Kelly in the closet and pushing him out. The three fight and Chuck reveals that he has a lover just like Cathy. And his lover is a man, too, named Rufus. (So now we have two people out of the closet.)

Sylvester then calls home and hears another man on the other end of the line. He rushes home and is stopped by a cop named James. When Sylvester finally gets home, the male voice turns out to be his brother-in-law, just released from prison.

Sylvester and his wife Gwendolyn make love so passionately and with so much purpose that Kelly says it's like sex "meant for having a baby."

Then Sylvester finds a condom wrapper in his bed, and he and Gwendolyn fight. Gwendolyn, it turns out, is having an affair with the cop.

Afraid for her safety, James the cop suddenly shows up at the house. Twan, the brother, comes home at the same time. There is some gunplay. Twan gets shot but it's a flesh wound. James goes back home to his wife Bridget.

Bridget is acting suspicious. She and James fight until we find out she is carrying on with a midget stripper in a purple pimp suit, who is the father of her baby.

Bridget calls Gwendolyn for help against the cop, and both Sylvester and Twan appear. Sylvester knows the midget from the clubs.

The show ends ambiguously with Gwendolyn calling Cathy, and Cathy confessing her affair with Sylvester -- and, of course, finding out that Rufus is the deacon to Pastor Chuck.

Explaining the plot doesn't explain how fucking camp it is. Camp in the sense of Sontag, camp in the sense of "no more wire hangers," camp like Lee Bowery delivering children at Wigstock, camp like early John Waters and late Douglas Sirk.

This is brilliant camp, both queer and black, where the world turns upside down and mocks the rich and powerful.

Hip hop often features piss takes on race, mocking moribund status symbols like Tommy Hilfiger. Kelly's hip-hopera is no different, transforming suburban McMansions into afrocentric temples, and taking trenchant digs at Mama On The Couch plays, Jay Z's paranoia, and the politics of black masculinity.

As for its gay camp, straight folk are uncontrollably unstable. Here, the hypocrisy of their power is laid clean. By having adultery cross class and race lines (Bridget is white, James is working class), and by adding such clowning as midgets and slapstick, Kelly mocks marriage. It's the gay radical's point of view: Why would you want to do a silly thing like that?

Hip hop also often features a certain hyper-masculinity. Or in the words of critic Scott Seward: "Hyper-masculine? For sure. But it should be noted that rap [is] the gayest popular music genre on earth! Oh sure, cabaret and show tunes in retrospect, and house music and disco in spirit, but for attitude, love of jewellery, revenge fantasies and leather pants nothing beats [rap]."

In Trapped In The Closet, Kelly turns the standard homophobia of hip hop inside out. Most viewers would assume that the most twisted act in this whole thing is Rufus and Chuck's love. It's not. The only time Kelly mentions how "twisted" something is he's referring to the midget.

I am not claiming that Kelly is gay, because he obviously is not. Though he does have that sensitive thug thing that makes one hard, similar to James Dean, early Marlon Brando and anyone who has shown up in a Bruce La Bruce movie. It's a good look.

This entire high camp works better in context. The camp melodrama, a high octane reworking of Peyton Place without moral condemnation, has mushroomed in the last few years.

Six Feet Under, created by a gay liberal, took itself too seriously, but had one of the few decent out men on television. On its heels came Desperate Housewives, created by a gay Republican as a tribute to his mother. Critics have rewarded that show as a comedy, but its status is floating and ambiguous.

Then there was Mr And Mrs Smith, who took the violence under the surface of these two shows and highly ritualized it, making the crisis of heterosexual masculinity a matter of literal life and death.

All of these examples are mostly white, with the token Latina and African-American character.

R Kelly' s Trapped In The Closet comes at the end of this -- and is as strange any of the other dramas that have come around.

But in an African-American context, it pushes the text to other communities. Its exaggerations work real issues of race and gender -- especially for mainstream gay audiences who might otherwise dismiss hip hop as too problematic to bother with.

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 01:20 (twenty years ago)

offering the queerest text ever charted in the genre

so you've never listened hard to Eminem, then?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 01:36 (twenty years ago)

or, fwiw, "Elevators"?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 01:38 (twenty years ago)

i think that trapped in the closet is more queer then eminem

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 01:40 (twenty years ago)

tell me about elevators

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 01:41 (twenty years ago)

why do you call it hip hop???

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 02:52 (twenty years ago)

Fuck telling: Show.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=dlcPD0oT53Y&search=outkast%20elevators

Austin Still (Austin, Still), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 02:53 (twenty years ago)

blount OTM

o -- (eman), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 03:14 (twenty years ago)

other queer 'hip hop' texts: 'my girl bill', 'you make me feel mighty real', 'can you forgive her?', 'it's raining men'

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 03:18 (twenty years ago)

i call it hip hop, because r kelly positions himself much closer to hip hop then r and b, and because his context connects himself there, rather then in strict line of soul singers, esp. the gangster schtick

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:17 (twenty years ago)

or cuz you don't know anything about hip hop maybe

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:19 (twenty years ago)

or cause yr a fucking dick

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:22 (twenty years ago)

but not fucking a dick

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:25 (twenty years ago)

I'm going to bet that Common line doesn't actually have anything to do with gays, and the Sugarhill Gang line isn't exactly 'burn faggots burn' or anything.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:25 (twenty years ago)

r kelly's likes to "rep his set" in his songs. discus.

o -- (eman), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:26 (twenty years ago)

(scratch the 's)

o -- (eman), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:27 (twenty years ago)

i'm gonna bet anthony's off his meds

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:28 (twenty years ago)

R Kelly's "Crunk in the Closet"

o -- (eman), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:30 (twenty years ago)

im not james, fully on my meds.

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:30 (twenty years ago)

james, what the hell? the 'meds' comment is WAY out of line.

geeta (geeta), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:31 (twenty years ago)

and if you don't like what he's written, then why not offer some constructive, in-depth criticism instead of lame, snarky one-liners?

geeta (geeta), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:32 (twenty years ago)

blount kelly is totally hiphop for fucks sake.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:34 (twenty years ago)

how does someone write about r kelly and 'queer' texts and not mention 'downlow'????

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:35 (twenty years ago)

1) cause im not talking about r kelly being gay
2) cause downlow and explaining would exceed my word count.
3) cause the editor cut it b/c of audeince

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:38 (twenty years ago)

i mean painting the mr. big saga as a gay epic, that 'downlow' is about downlow might be worth reading in a celluloid closet way. plus homosexuality as omg plot twist is nothing new for kelly anyhow, he did it at the end of the 'be careful' vid. someone might've looked at that 'trend' (3 makes a trend right?), dug deeper and found more maybe, and come up with something maybe. although to be fair we definitely don't have enough thinkpieces on 'trapped in the closet'! it's been a month at least.

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:43 (twenty years ago)

i mean why not mention the twist in 'be careful'? that was a bigger hit than 'trapped in the closet' anyhow.

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:44 (twenty years ago)

we definitely don't have enough thinkpieces on 'trapped in the closet'! it's been a month at least.

the vancouver gay magazines were just brimming with them, you're totally right. i mean if there's one thing that the entire gay subculture of vancouver knows all about and is sick of talking about that thing is r kelly.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:47 (twenty years ago)

sterl you should pitch a piece to southern voice about how dancehall is usually homophobic but popular dancehall artist r kelly has charted with a queer text go figure!

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:50 (twenty years ago)

yes, this truly is something worthy of outrage!

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:50 (twenty years ago)

james

i am not claiming the text is gay, i think that the homosex is the least interesting bit in this entire saga.

i am claiming the text is queer. i think that the structure of the text, and its emergence in the midst of domestic melodrama. and its over played camp.

thats way gay positive hip-hop has struck me as earnest and less interesting, then how trapped in the closet slots into, and extends, in demographically novel ways, the meme of queering domestic texts--like 6 feet under, Desperate Housewives, etc.

The tone, the formal implications of the tone, etc are what i am framing here.

i have heard be careful, its not as interesting or strange as trapped and if i was talkign about gay texts, i would include downlow, etc.

the autobiographical framing came from my editors desires, and to get the cheque, i play that game, but a lot of it is true, this emergerent formal queering of certain hip hop texts and how that fits into other popuar culture

(think of it as rock hudsons home movies, not celluioud cloest)

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:51 (twenty years ago)

blount, hip hip is a feeling man.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:54 (twenty years ago)

anway all "urban" music is the same.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:55 (twenty years ago)

Hip hip and cheerio.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 05:01 (twenty years ago)

i'm trying to think if there's been any dealing with downlow in black - sorry 'hip hop' - pop culture where it hasn't been either presented as omg plot twist, rimshot (cf. how terry mcmillan's divorce was treated), or opportunity for jeremiad (either 'homosexuality is a plot by white america to destroy the black community' or yr standard leviticus bullshit).

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 05:02 (twenty years ago)

i thought the ideas in the article were pretty interesting, if a bit out of my league (fuck a desperate housewife), but i also think anthony should get a better sense for hiphop before generalizing about it by reference to a single artist/song that barely fits within the genre

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 05:08 (twenty years ago)

college hill.

there's also lots of flamboyant gay characters tho the portrayals aren't particularly fantastically positive.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 05:10 (twenty years ago)

wtf is this "genre" bullshit anyway?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 05:10 (twenty years ago)

better than they all look the same

and im wrong, ok, about referring only to a single artist. and the jay-z take was somewhat insightful. but generally anthony seems not to be getting inside these artists the way (some of) their lyrics deserve. which seems to miss the point about hiphop.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 05:12 (twenty years ago)

there's maybe a weird wesley snipes thing going on with serious depictions of black gay men in tv/movies in that they are almost always with a white man ('rent's seriously the only exception i can think of!). also someone should catalog all the black romcom flix where the gabrielle union figure will start to moan about dating woes talking about how all the eligible black men she meets are either unemployed or dating a white woman and then girlfriend will pipe up 'or they're gay' (i'm thinking this trend might've started with the girl chatsession scene in jungle fever - the subject of an episode of oprah!).

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 05:18 (twenty years ago)

it wasnt an attempt towards an answer, it was asking some questions. it was my first try to figure out how to interact with hip hop, and talking about one text which i could id as belonging to territory that was not hostile...

thats colonial of me, and im willing to cage to that, but i think that to acknowledge that, well doesnt give me a pass, but places it in a context.

yeah i dont know much about hip hop, but i think i should, i think that my discomfort with it is pathetic, but i also know queer shit, and i know that r kelly is interesting b/c of his instability wrt genre...

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 05:56 (twenty years ago)

Anthony, I think the point of contention here is that R. Kelly isn't exactly considered hip-hop. R&B? Yes. Hip-Hop? um....

There can obviously be R&B elements in hip-hop (background singing, sample sources, etc.), and there can be hip-hop style elements in R&B (rhythm, guest rappers, etc.)... but R. Kelly falls in the latter category.

Yoo Doo Nut (donut), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 07:12 (twenty years ago)

The thing is.. if you generalized the article to be about R&B, then you'd have to discount the campiness of Rick James, Parliament, Outkast, oodles of etc. which would be a bit crazy to do.

Yoo Doo Nut (donut), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 07:13 (twenty years ago)

That said, I don't think there's going to be outrage in the Vancouver gay community about this.. maybe one trainspotter will write a complaint letter.

Yoo Doo Nut (donut), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 07:14 (twenty years ago)

the Sugarhill Gang line isn't exactly 'burn faggots burn' or anything

Yeah, it's a guy trying to crack onto a woman by ridiculously undermining the prominent masculinity of her boyfriend, this is like claiming the party verse in Gangsta Gangsta as a homophobic text

also why is nobody calling Anthony on his repugnant MIDGETIST tendencies omg

kit brash (kit brash), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 07:48 (twenty years ago)

I'm surprised at the hostile reaction -- I thought this was a good piece, and you have to bear in mind the context of publication (i.e. not primarily designed for ILX wonks). The autobiographical framing works well, I think.

alext (alext), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 07:56 (twenty years ago)

Mr. Big is a gay text? I thought it was a hair-metal band.

Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 13:42 (twenty years ago)

wtf is this "genre" bullshit anyway?

yeah, how about that dancehall artist, Bob Marley?

o -- (eman), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 15:23 (twenty years ago)

I thought he did reggaeton. OH WHY DOES THE MEDIA LIE.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 15:25 (twenty years ago)

he plays classic rock. HELLO PEOPLE.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 15:48 (twenty years ago)

it's a good piece, though I'm a little weirded out by yr later "i should like hip-hop" bit: why? do you feel like your aversion to the permeating homophobia is something to be gotten-over?

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 15:57 (twenty years ago)

It is a good piece. I think you guys are getting weirdly worked up.

Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:05 (twenty years ago)

anthony is gay?

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:06 (twenty years ago)

no, anthony is queer identified

i explain that in the first ppgh, that its a lingua franca, that im missing something in the general culture by not listening to it.

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:25 (twenty years ago)

but you said 'As a gay man'...

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:28 (twenty years ago)

sometimes we say things because of space concerns.

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:30 (twenty years ago)

but isn't there a bit of a difference?

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:33 (twenty years ago)

citing "space concerns" in a 1,261-word piece seems a mite disingenuous to me

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:36 (twenty years ago)

LOWERCASE WRITIN' ILX D00DZ BE FIGHTING ;(

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:39 (twenty years ago)

Lowercase for space concerns, though.

Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:40 (twenty years ago)

i want answers or i take this to gawker, y'dig?

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:43 (twenty years ago)

Despite collaborations and songwriting I'd still classify R. Kelly and hip hop as seperate spheres. That aside, I think the reading of "Trapped in the Closet" as a queer text works. I've heard it described as the sort of story a kid would make up in that the plot is nonsensical and poor as a literary work but it's easy to spin this into a case for it being camp. I think the article could be better framed in terms of the interactions R. Kelly's had with the hip-hop community at large in that his music is enjoyed and he's prized as a songwriter and hook-crooner, but his touring collaboration with Jay-Z imploded and the two groups were incompatible on the road. There's a history of r&b that delves into a friendlier dancefloor than you're going to see with an all-rap crowd. You'd do well to establish that R&B is a more accepting culture as well: Where's Luther Vandross?

mike h. (mike h.), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:56 (twenty years ago)

hell.

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:58 (twenty years ago)

semantics, mostly, i guess--gay is easier in a lede, because you dont get bogged in on theory and explaining theory right away.

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:59 (twenty years ago)

you know, 'Trapped...' is also 'queer' in the original sense of the term, being that it's rather odd or unusual.

latebloomer is a belly with a guy pierce in it (latebloomer), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 17:00 (twenty years ago)

actually, how can you get in a discussion of r. kelly and sexuality without mentioning, i don't know, r. kelly's sexuality? it's kind of a matter of public record.

mike h. (mike h.), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 17:09 (twenty years ago)

r kellys playing with sexual personae is a fucking book--i had a line about him being a paedophile piss queen, but it sort of distracted

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 17:14 (twenty years ago)

that's a really good piece, anthony.

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 17:19 (twenty years ago)

i explain that in the first ppgh, that its a lingua franca, that im missing something in the general culture by not listening to it.

I ain't buyin' that Anthony. There's a whole shit-ton of stuff in the general culture that you & I & everyone we know ignore, even if we're clued-in: that's what that first barrier, of taste & basic beliefs, is for. I mean, you're missing something in the general culture by not marrying & having 1.5 kids and not knowing who Bataille is, too, but because that ain't you, you just go "eh - road not taken 'n' all," right? right then

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 17:20 (twenty years ago)

k

Confounded (Confounded), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 17:21 (twenty years ago)

clumsy sentence there - the general culture stereotype person 1) marries 2) has kids 3) ain't read Bataille & would hate it if he did

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 17:23 (twenty years ago)

i havent read a lot of batialle, i want to get married, and have kids--wanna get hitched tom?

but if you are working as a critic, in pop music, or position yrself in that way, and dont know which way the current runs, you become gunnelled.

its like writing about contemparary art, and not knowing about or not liking duchamp, it reeks of the reactionary.

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 18:26 (twenty years ago)

its like writing about contemparary art, and not knowing about or not liking duchamp, it reeks of the reactionary.

-- anthony easton (anthonyeasto...), March 22nd, 2006.

christ alive, man. duchamp (and bataille frankly--also an actual reactionary) is about as played a reference point as you could possibly have in 2006. not liking him isn't reactionary. not knowing him would be a good excuse for not constantly coming back to his boring ideas.

gay is easier in a lede, because you dont get bogged in on theory and explaining theory right away.
-- anthony easton (anthonyeasto...), March 22nd, 2006.

you don't explain later that when you said 'as a gay man' you meant something else...

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Thursday, 23 March 2006 09:29 (twenty years ago)

cmon enrique duchamp may be 'played' but his ideas are hardly boring, it's the people who copied him who were boring! (and yeah i know thinking that is probably 'played' too blah blah blah blah)

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 23 March 2006 09:40 (twenty years ago)

it's like mark s's thing with walter benjamin's 'art in the..'.

i was in a seminar on monday and the person giving a presentation referenced a) that, and b) foucault's 'what is an author?'.

this is what i'm talking about!

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Thursday, 23 March 2006 09:49 (twenty years ago)

what should the person have been referencing? i'm a little skeeved by pop-style "...in 2006" comments coming from academic-types. do things really move that quickly? doesn't anyone do any research anymore? (yeah how's that for reactionary)

geoff (gcannon), Thursday, 23 March 2006 10:04 (twenty years ago)

ppl shd reference what they like! (the main thing i don't like about hackademia is the relentless search for the next hot theorist, cf recent 'hauntology' thread on ile.) people *don't* do research any more; they do what they call 'excavations', ie readings from the 'archive'; it can't just be research, it has to be some kind of foucauldian moral philosophy-as-history-type escapade.

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Thursday, 23 March 2006 10:24 (twenty years ago)

bataille is completely goth.

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 23 March 2006 11:58 (twenty years ago)

well exactly.

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Thursday, 23 March 2006 11:59 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.