Girls Aloud have split up..

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
.. according to the News Of The World:


EXCLUSIVE: Girls Aloud for the high jump

RAV'S SHOWBIZ ROUNDUP

By Rav Singh

POP outfit GIRLS ALOUD are to split, I can exclusively reveal.

The five-piece girl band, who scored two No1 singles and two Top Ten albums, will go their separate ways next year following a string of furious rows.

A source close to the girls said: "They just don't talk at all � it's over for them. There's always been a rift in the band.

"Nadine and Cheryl don't talk, there is no communication. There's also a rift between Sarah and the others."

Nadine and Cheryl's problems are thought to be the last straw for the band, who have just finished their sell-out UK tour.

Heart

The source added: "Nadine has been saying that Cheryl thinks she's VICTORIA BECKHAM, especially after hanging around with Posh during the World Cup.

"And the other girls reckon Cheryl feels that she's above them � they don't think her heart is in the band any more."

The revelation comes after Cheryl spent the summer with the England WAGs in Germany, where fianc� ASHLEY COLE, 25, was playing in the World Cup.

While there, it was clear that she became bosom buddies with former captain DAVID BECKHAM's wife Victoria, 32.

CHERYL TWEEDY, 23, NICOLA ROBERTS, 20, KIMBERLEY WALSH, 24, NADINE COYLE, 21, and SARAH HARDING, 24, shot to fame after winning ITV's reality talent show Popstars: The Rivals in 2002.

But now the most successful female band since the SPICE GIRLS will release their last album � a Greatest Hits compilation.

The source said: "They will split next year.

"They've decided to go their separate ways because things have got so bad between them. They keep trying to outdo each other and it's got ridiculous."


Does anyone have a more reliable source?

Affectian (Affectian), Sunday, 9 July 2006 17:08 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe there will be a WAGS Supergroup (sponsored by Heat Magazine)

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Sunday, 9 July 2006 17:12 (nineteen years ago)

it doesn't matter.

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 9 July 2006 17:16 (nineteen years ago)

cheryl and victoria can form a band: wags anonymous.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Sunday, 9 July 2006 19:40 (nineteen years ago)

I bet their respective managers will be thinking about that themselves -
"Does anyone know if Colleen can sing?"

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Sunday, 9 July 2006 19:58 (nineteen years ago)

the road is clear for the pipettes now

keyth (keyth), Sunday, 9 July 2006 21:00 (nineteen years ago)

what does the word "Heart" mean in that piece above?

michael wells (michael w.), Sunday, 9 July 2006 21:10 (nineteen years ago)

It's probably a sub-heading to break up the story. Like a chapter title.

Navek Rednam (Navek Rednam), Sunday, 9 July 2006 21:16 (nineteen years ago)

This is terrible news.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Sunday, 9 July 2006 21:29 (nineteen years ago)

Eh, we knew it was coming, just not exactly when or why. The only thing that would most upset me out of this would be if Cheryl manages to launch herself successfully (a la Geri) as opposed to getting what she deserves (i.e., Posh's solo career).

pleased to mitya (mitya), Sunday, 9 July 2006 21:59 (nineteen years ago)

Has anyone been to their sell-out UK tour? Report please thanks.

JoB (JoB), Sunday, 9 July 2006 22:06 (nineteen years ago)

Those "Gemma" pics and captions are very silly.

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 10 July 2006 12:02 (nineteen years ago)

Not to mention the actual implants.

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Monday, 10 July 2006 12:07 (nineteen years ago)

I attended their sell-out UK tour. Report available at usual market rates.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 10 July 2006 12:10 (nineteen years ago)

it's not news, Snrub, it's a NOTW report

zebedee (zebedee), Monday, 10 July 2006 12:13 (nineteen years ago)

Probably a timeley departure. I'd like one more storming single though, and the Greatest Hits is going to be amazing.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 10 July 2006 12:13 (nineteen years ago)

It's all my fault.

"The thought of being in the same profession as that fookin' nutter was just too much for me to take," quipped Tweedy, 28, at a press conference this morning.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 10 July 2006 12:15 (nineteen years ago)

first sleater-kinney, now this? i may as well kill myself. maybe this will free up corin tucker and cheryl tweedy to finally work together like many have dreamed about.

el juan (el juan), Monday, 10 July 2006 12:21 (nineteen years ago)

the road is clear for the pipettes now

in with a bullet at #26 this week. hmm.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Monday, 10 July 2006 13:10 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe this means Xenomania will give all their good songs to the Sugababes again.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 10 July 2006 13:16 (nineteen years ago)

The road is clear for Mania now...

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 10 July 2006 13:18 (nineteen years ago)

Except all the Mania songs have been farmed out now.

edward o (edwardo), Monday, 10 July 2006 13:25 (nineteen years ago)

If Xenomania could persuade H and Claire to reunite, and write and produce their records, we'd have that 21st century Dollar.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 10 July 2006 13:26 (nineteen years ago)

Except Dollar could actually pass for a couple, H and Claire couldn't. They were too similar. Claire opened her mouth really wide when she sang, H opened h... oh, nevermind.

edward o (edwardo), Monday, 10 July 2006 13:28 (nineteen years ago)

but maybe Cheryl can save the day!

Affectian (Affectian), Tuesday, 11 July 2006 18:50 (nineteen years ago)

first syd now this?

what a fucking day.

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 11 July 2006 18:53 (nineteen years ago)

three years pass...

not sure where else this is being discussed on ilm but her new single is pretty forgettable. didnt really feel it was a love worth fighting for. ;)

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Monday, 19 October 2009 13:16 (sixteen years ago)

though saying that, the chorus is now going round in my head. i just wish it wasnt.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Monday, 19 October 2009 13:16 (sixteen years ago)

Cheryl performed it live on X FActor last night, but I can't remember what it sounds like.

a gift from your mind in the form of the perfect beat (snoball), Monday, 19 October 2009 14:48 (sixteen years ago)

She sang it in a mostly mid-atlantic accent with occasional geordie lilt.

Mark G, Monday, 19 October 2009 14:49 (sixteen years ago)

why arent xenomania working with her anymore?

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Monday, 19 October 2009 15:21 (sixteen years ago)

I'm pretty sure they did some songs for her... my guess is they probably didn't fit the overall vibe of the album and they were left out. BTW The only problem with Cheryl's song is Cheryl. The backing track is excellent IMO... ok the lyrics are awful as well.

one boob is free with one (daavid), Monday, 19 October 2009 21:13 (sixteen years ago)

the song is a grower, it's totally unimpressive but it's nice. i've heard clips of her album and if you didn't love this chances are nothing on the album will really strike you.

musically, Monday, 19 October 2009 22:02 (sixteen years ago)

the backing track is decent, but theres no hooks that grab you. and the lyrics are quite banal. which im guessing is exactly what cheryl wanted, but theres a reason she didnt used to get what she wanted.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Monday, 19 October 2009 22:10 (sixteen years ago)

..the reason being this dude telling her to stfu and let him do his job?
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Sa9SPINujks/SOSDlmt7QkI/AAAAAAAAASc/R7SfnSZscmk/s400/higgins.jpg

one boob is free with one (daavid), Monday, 19 October 2009 22:22 (sixteen years ago)

Cheryl Cole's first solo single is on course to become the year's biggest-selling single, the Official Charts Company says.

! still can't be bothered to listen

modescalator (blueski), Tuesday, 20 October 2009 18:22 (sixteen years ago)

it doesnt deserve to do that well.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 20 October 2009 18:23 (sixteen years ago)

thing is i understand the basic appeal of cheryl cole, but i don't get why anyone would be...fanatically adoring of her and supportive of everything she does, including this NOTHING single. it barely exists.

lex pretend, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 18:27 (sixteen years ago)

whaaaaaaaaaaat. i thought alex burke would outsell her even on week 2.

i don't even know why i pay attention to the charts, they only frustrate me.

musically, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)

It's a bit sad that this bland-o track outsells 90% of the group's catalogue, but it's not surprising. Them selling so well with many of their singles have been a sort of 'against-nature' mystery, a happy one, of course, but their sound has never sounded chart storming (outside of the crap covers). This track fits with the pleasant, boring, half-rnb lull that some uk rappers have turned to with great #1 success lately.

abcfsk, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 19:00 (sixteen years ago)

I was listening to the radio (hits radio) the other day and I was shocked by how many things sounded exactly like this. Is it me, or is chart pop going through a very safe/predictable phase again? :(

one boob is free with one (daavid), Tuesday, 20 October 2009 21:47 (sixteen years ago)

To a certain degree. All the tinchy stryder-ish bland pop soundalikes being automatic number ones is a bit disturbing.

abcfsk, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 22:09 (sixteen years ago)

I dunno, I thought it was alright...

Mark G, Tuesday, 20 October 2009 22:16 (sixteen years ago)

for me what's especially mind-numbing isn't so much the single being derivative of current popular musical trends as it is that derivativeness so inanely cannibalising militaristic lyrical wheezes too - jordin's 'battlefield', amerie's in love & war, and so on. perhaps generally speaking it was ever thus and some sort of inevitable finicky pensioner ennui has made it all strike me as so stupefyingly blatant though, i dunno.

listening to the album now and cole really is an astonishingly flat and pointless vocalist - as much of a disconnect between her and the material as there is with her not-particularly-pleasant-person-ness and the people's princess status she's been afforded so blithely. pairing that up - as happens on this album four bloody times - with will i am and his sometimes banal, sometimes lackadaisaical general sense of ambivalence is truly one of the least inviting combinations ever.

r|t|c, Thursday, 22 October 2009 13:27 (sixteen years ago)

what makes her the ppls princess again? i cant remember. apart from the fact 'shes fit' etc.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Thursday, 22 October 2009 15:14 (sixteen years ago)

Generous but thoughtful review from Tom Ewing, stepping into the Petridis hotseat: http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2009/oct/22/cheryl-cole-3-words-review

Stevie T, Thursday, 22 October 2009 15:21 (sixteen years ago)

3 Words at first sounds like a throwback to the 90s, when acts like Louise Redknapp would put us to sleep with their unshakeably nice R&B lite.

Cheryl needs to make her own '2 Faced'.

modescalator (blueski), Thursday, 22 October 2009 15:52 (sixteen years ago)

she really doesn't.

lex pretend, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:39 (sixteen years ago)

what a divisive artiste

modescalator (blueski), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:45 (sixteen years ago)

see, i'm not saying invoking the ashley affair comes across as glib exactly but to me at least the issue seems a good deal vaguer and more diluted now than it did a year or so ago, when 'heartbreaker' was first doing the rounds and its whole general insinuation was fresher in the mind; basically i don't know quite how true it rings any longer, and i'd want to be extremely careful about it because it's an extremely attractive vector into the album and once leant on even slightly you find the the whole thing suddenly becoming suspiciously easy to explain.

on the other hand it may be that i am a careless, bovine sort of fellow and the healing, chilly detachment of adultery remains forever latent in both the woman scorned and her empathising vultures nation of concerned observers, yada yada.

r|t|c, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:46 (sixteen years ago)

once wronged, forever wronged in gossip mag vulture land, i guess. cf the still-lonely jennifer aniston, 5 or is it 6 years after her divorce?

did anyone have the slightest inkling of what cheryl's singing voice was like before she went solo? we're talking about someone who comes in some way below rachel stevens in terms of charisma and oomph.

lex pretend, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:55 (sixteen years ago)

wait, run the aniston ref by me again? if it's how i think you mean then i think i'm still agreeing with the gossmags about her, haha.

tbh with cheryl i never really liked her enough to partic feel for her when she got the rug pulled out from under, so perhaps i'm not best placed to assess how her rehabilitation might resonate. whyyy do people see this girl next door superfriend in her though? it seems so plain to me she has a nasty edge.

r|t|c, Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:23 (sixteen years ago)

Cmon.. the album is shit and suddenly people are excited, bloodthirsty vultures. She seems like a normal, pleasant girl to me. Not 'nation's sweetheart' but are anyone? Did she go for the title of the nation's princess? She accepted a tv offer and things escalated. Why people deride tabloids and and then go gossiping about how vile a person some, for all we know, perfectly innocent, perfectly decent person, is -- it's beyond me. Quite distasteful.

abcfsk, Thursday, 22 October 2009 18:23 (sixteen years ago)

um

r|t|c, Friday, 23 October 2009 14:42 (sixteen years ago)

btw i have just been met with this after complaining about ripoffs yesterday

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aZjhwL59vk

LOL ;_;

r|t|c, Friday, 23 October 2009 14:46 (sixteen years ago)

Wow they even kept half of the original song title!

musically, Friday, 23 October 2009 20:45 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.