TS: grime vs. dubstep - which is the best of these UK garage offshoots?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
i vote for dubstep
it doesnt have shit MCing on it (apart from when grime MCs get on it after bribing kode 9 and plasticman with haribo to give them the mic)
it has more bass
its well produced
its not cheap and nasty sounding
it doesnt have shit MCing on it
theres less of a gaping chasm in quality control between the majority of dubstep like there is grime (theres tons of it out there, but only about 5% is brilliant)
there are less hilarious over intellectualisations made about dubstep like there was with grime (well, apart from on certain blogs)

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 10:57 (nineteen years ago)

dubstep's easier to get into/understand if you're down with breaks and standard dance music. the producers are connected in, the beats match, it's all good. grime's a bit harder, a bit less compromising, a bit weirder, definitely a lot more lo-fi. i instinctively like dubstep, but i'm sometimes blown away by grime.

matt levinson (mattl), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 11:06 (nineteen years ago)

grime doesn't make me quite as fidgety nor sleepy.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 11:06 (nineteen years ago)

dubstep is also the only sub genre indebted to ovaltine that uk garage has produced, yes.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 11:09 (nineteen years ago)

i guess it's good that some people under 30 like dubstep.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 11:09 (nineteen years ago)

Isn't this a bit like saying, which is better, hip hop or techno?

Nedpoleon (NedBeauman), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 11:11 (nineteen years ago)

other good things about the dubstep side of things -
you can mediate on bass weight but without using scales or any actual weighing device
its better to smoke to than grime (grime is more red bull/vodka-and-amphetamine-suited i would say)
it appeals to an older, more discerning, knowledgeable crowd who are well versed in dance music history rather than the toddlers who like grime and have no concept of listening to music on decent sound systems so the bass weight would totally be lost on them if they heard it on their tinny mp3 players (never mind that they know nothing of the rich and plentiful dance lineage that dubstep draws from yet respectfully adds to and realigns in a way that reflects what life in london is really like)

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 11:17 (nineteen years ago)

dubstep is very very very boring.

The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 11:22 (nineteen years ago)

ummm, NO LEX. just cos you cant say 'oooh it makes me shake my ass' doesnt mean its boring.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 11:30 (nineteen years ago)

ok i guess it's not boring if you're stoned, but i hate weed.

The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 11:37 (nineteen years ago)

1:1 at halftime

winner to be decided on Greatest Hits circe 2010

fandango (fandango), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 11:40 (nineteen years ago)

btw, konal, i think the phrase youre looking for in place of 'fidgety' is 'wracked with tension, that fine line between restraint and release, which not entirely coincidentally, mirrors the behavioural traits of the majority of those living in the gut of ken livingstons london'

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 11:44 (nineteen years ago)

titchy u always favoured the shitty wonder/geeneus dubsteppy grime anyway, this thread is like zero surprise

rtccc (mwah), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 11:57 (nineteen years ago)

no, i also favoured wiley (avenger is amazing), dizzee, terror danjah as well. i just didnt like most davinche (phaze is good though) and things like that. i like ruff sqwad though. but i did and still DO like geeneus and wonder. dont see whats wrong with that? theyre both brilliant producers who dont sound like theyre just pressing the 'demo' button on fruity loops or their new korgs. they sound like theyve been producing for more than five minutes. nothing wrong with a bit of expertise here and there you know (same with statik), its not like theyre getting all sterile. and anyway, geeneus' grand theft auto was one of the best grime beats ever. riko must have liked it or he wouldnt have vocalled it.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 12:06 (nineteen years ago)

btw, konal, i think the phrase youre looking for in place of 'fidgety' is 'wracked with tension, that fine line between restraint and release, which not entirely coincidentally, mirrors the behavioural traits of the majority of those living in the gut of ken livingstons london'
-- titchyschneider (titchyschneide...), July 18th, 2006.

hahahahahahahahaha

you have put me off ever even going near a dubstep record.

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 12:12 (nineteen years ago)

there are less hilarious over intellectualisations made about dubstep like there was with grime

The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 12:15 (nineteen years ago)

really, i loved the hilarious over-intellectualisations - what irked me about grime writing was the fucking over-emotionalisation, all that emo wibbly "look at the sadness in his eyes as he shouts about gats" shit.

save that shit for projection re: britney spears' 'everytime'!

The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 12:16 (nineteen years ago)

it appeals to an older, more discerning, knowledgeable crowd who are well versed in dance music history

you sound like a cream fan.

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 12:17 (nineteen years ago)

xpost - there's LOADS of Dubstep that doesn't fit this stupid, insanely limited insta-narrative.

Writing whole genres of, even new, barely born ones (yes yes I know 5 yr roots etc but has it become ALL it's going to become already?) is daft.

fandango (fandango), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 12:18 (nineteen years ago)

who are cream?

The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 12:20 (nineteen years ago)

sighhh why do ppl fall for titchy schtick every time, u know what he's doing.

rtccc (mwah), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 12:21 (nineteen years ago)

btw, konal, i think the phrase youre looking for in place of 'fidgety' is 'wracked with tension, that fine line between restraint and release, which not entirely coincidentally, mirrors the behavioural traits of the majority of those living in the gut of ken livingstons london'

no i used 'fidgety' because it makes me fidget because i find it so dull 95% of the time. granted my attention span and patience levels lately are plumbing new depths of lowness but still.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 12:25 (nineteen years ago)

granted my attention span and patience levels lately are plumbing new depths of lowness but still

Welcome to 2006

Rev. PappaWheelie (PappaWheelie 2), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 13:09 (nineteen years ago)

shall i revive the grime in '06 thread? it certainly needs a post or two..

xyzzzz__ (jdesouza), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 13:59 (nineteen years ago)

Dubstep is the new IDM. It's entirely possible to enjoy it in earnest, but there are always going to be assholes who sit around acting like listening to it is the same thing as tasting fine wine.

m.p.a. (m.p.a.), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 14:30 (nineteen years ago)

titchyschneider: is this just a thread about how you like dubstep, but had to start it in the form of a question because "I Love Dubstep" is not a suitable thread topic? That is what it seems like here.

In other news, I don't mind dubstep at all, but I certainly prefer the lo-fi grittiness of grime.

Pop Ryan (Rebelwordsmith), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 15:03 (nineteen years ago)

Why does the grime vs. dubstep distinction even exist anyway? I can't help but feel that this is all part of something being fed to people by Pitchfork and its various hipster satellites.

m.p.a. (m.p.a.), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 15:55 (nineteen years ago)

er because grime sounds very different to dubstep??

i can assure you that that site plays approx 0 role in the creation of either.

The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 16:04 (nineteen years ago)

Lex --

I'm not talking about the difference between grime and dubstep, but rather the idea that the two genres are somehow at odds with one another.

m.p.a. (m.p.a.), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 16:34 (nineteen years ago)

why wouldn't they be? sounds a fair bit like Jump-Up vs Intelligent in '94.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 16:36 (nineteen years ago)

but, perhaps - i mean i guess it is conceivable, we have moved on from those days.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 16:36 (nineteen years ago)

Lex --

Also, I find it hard to believe that Pitchfork -- a site that runs almost weekly features on either grime or dubstep and is responsible for making these two genres visible to an American audience -- plays absolutely no role in the preponderance of talk about these types of music. Pitchfork has been creating fads within America's non-mainstream (for lack of a better term, as usual) music audience for years now.

m.p.a. (m.p.a.), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 16:43 (nineteen years ago)

OK change that 0 in Lex's post to 0.00001 or so. The fact that it's your first point of reference says a lot more about you than anyone or anything else

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 18:24 (nineteen years ago)

Oh and I'm sorry but "better weed music" is a terribly weak plus point for any genre or whatever

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 18:26 (nineteen years ago)

2003 = virtually nobody talking about grime.
2005-06 = every English-speaking hipster on the face of the earth rocking Dizzee Rascal.

Grime is electroclash, dancepunk, and freakfolk all over again. Just another fad spearheaded by the cool kids over at Pitchfork.

Of course, you and everybody else on this forum are the exceptions to the rule. You knew about all that stuff way before the hipster media was on top of it. I apologize.

m.p.a. (m.p.a.), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 18:40 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah grime's just a fad. Like hip hop - whatever happened to that?

Nedpoleon (NedBeauman), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 18:59 (nineteen years ago)

Nope. Grime isn't a fad. It's just been introduced as a fad. There's a difference.

And being that it's hard to distinguish sometimes between UK and USA people on this forum, you'll note that the introduction of grime/dubstep/etc. to the American hipster community is likely far different than how it occurred in the UK. I should have made that distinction earlier.

m.p.a. (m.p.a.), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 19:05 (nineteen years ago)

Somewhere in the hinterland between these genres is probably best. Too much torpid halfstepping makes Jack a fucking bored boy...

Grime has lost it a bit hasn't it? Or is it restructuring itself into a self-supporting system that doesn't need the majors? But its no fad. It might be for the beard stroking hipsters in NY (or whatever) but in East LDN?

gekoppel (Gekoppel), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 19:12 (nineteen years ago)

2003??

Boy In Da Corner came out 2003! If anything that was the -highpoint- of grime getting media coverage + hipster attention.

I don't think Grime is very popular with hipsters even now is it? about 1/10th as popular as Kompakt, or MSTRKRFT, or Clap Your Hands Say Yeah, or tons of other stuff surely?

"Fake grime" (stirring here) like M.I.A. or Various Productions gets more attention than I dunno, fucking Bear Man surely? I'm not exactly seeing people YSI-ing Plastician sets along with DFA mixes much...

fandango (fandango), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 19:24 (nineteen years ago)

I suspect Dubstep will be edging into the hipster set all too soon...

gekoppel (Gekoppel), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 21:21 (nineteen years ago)

Which means what exactly?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 21:33 (nineteen years ago)

Which means that people who previously couldn't give a rats arse about it say a year ago (or more likely: did not know of its existence) when it got zero media coverage beyond certain forums and blogs will start to listen to it. This may be a good or bad thing, depending on a number of other factors...

gekoppel (Gekoppel), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 21:44 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think people outside of the readership of a few blogs and certain forums are going to give much of a shit about dubstep either and unless something changes like there are a whole slew of dubstep records released on Matador I'd doubt that is going to change much. I'd be seriously shocked if the Burial album sells as much as MIA let alone Dizzee. And I'd be willing bet those "Monthly" columns (which have be going on for nearly a year now) are among the least read things on Pitchfork (which is too bad because they're the best thing they do by a huge margin.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 21:57 (nineteen years ago)

I might be wrong but I can't recall ANY remotely "urban" music without heavy associations of fashion and/or glamour or pissed-up/coked-up fun suddenly becoming the IN thing on say... stereogum.com

fandango (fandango), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 22:07 (nineteen years ago)

"it appeals to an older, more discerning, knowledgeable crowd who are well versed in dance music history rather than the toddlers who like grime and have no concept of listening to music on decent sound systems so the bass weight would totally be lost on them if they heard it on their tinny mp3 players (never mind that they know nothing of the rich and plentiful dance lineage that dubstep draws from yet respectfully adds to and realigns in a way that reflects what life in london is really like)"

Either titchy is very silly or he's actually trying to destroy dubstep's cred from the inside.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 01:09 (nineteen years ago)

Dubstep morelike rubstep amirite?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 01:16 (nineteen years ago)

So, in other words, dubstep appeals to all the assholes in the world? Damn. I hope this guy isn't the dubstep community's PR man.

m.p.a. (m.p.a.), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 02:05 (nineteen years ago)

Titchysnider should probably STFU, as he's talking out of his arse. Dubstep is great, though. This thread is just another 'apples v. oranges' IMO.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 03:35 (nineteen years ago)

2003 = virtually nobody talking about grime.
2005-06 = every English-speaking hipster on the face of the earth rocking Dizzee Rascal.

hahaha wow this has cheered me right up.

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 08:00 (nineteen years ago)

Also, I find it hard to believe that Pitchfork -- a site that runs almost weekly features on either grime or dubstep and is responsible for making these two genres visible to an American audience -- plays absolutely no role in the preponderance of talk about these types of music. Pitchfork has been creating fads within America's non-mainstream (for lack of a better term, as usual) music audience for years now.

so many ways to take the piss, so little time

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 12:21 (nineteen years ago)

Lex --

If there are so many ways, why not do it?

m.p.a. (m.p.a.), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 12:44 (nineteen years ago)

I assumed you were another comedy character, the other people posting here may disagree

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 12:52 (nineteen years ago)

Is that why you answered my post in earnest before?

m.p.a. (m.p.a.), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:20 (nineteen years ago)

If there are so many ways, why not do it?

do you really think that pitchfork - or come to that any INTERNET SITE - has remotely anything to do with how the music fundamentally is? how it's created, why it's created, how it's consumed &c &c.

and no sodding internet site plays that much of a role in the talk about the music, either. they bring it to your attention and then you do the talk yourself. i am profoundly grateful i have never heard anyone in real life say the word 'pitchfork' as if they or i should give a shit what its verdict is - i am profoundly disturbed that there appear to be people who do this.

click. away. from the internet.

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:22 (nineteen years ago)

do you really think that pitchfork - or come to that any INTERNET SITE - has remotely anything to do with how the music fundamentally is? how it's created, why it's created, how it's consumed &c &c.

well, actually the internet *does* affect how the music is consumed!

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:29 (nineteen years ago)

Lex --

Since you used the word "sodding," I think I'm safe in finally identifying you as somebody from the UK. In which case, the Pitchfork effect doesn't really apply. What I can tell you is that I didn't hear anybody at all stateside talking about Dizzee Rascal and such until Pitchfork had already pimped it for a few weeks. Then it was suddenly "grime" this and "grime" that.

Second, I never claimed that Pitchfork has changed the music. Just that it has created the American concept of "grime" as though it were a fad that had emerged overnight. They have created it, in other words, as a watchword for hipsters, much like they've done with "electroclash," "dancepunk," and "freakfolk." That grime, and more recently dubstep, have emerged in America as fads does not speak ill, necessarily, of the music. What I'm doing is criticizing the shortsighted, Pitchfork mentality that spawns fake shit like "grime vs. dubstep: which is better?"

m.p.a. (m.p.a.), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 13:46 (nineteen years ago)

TS: m.p.a. vs. titchyschneider: which one is stupider?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)

That is easily the funniest thing I've heard so far this month.

m.p.a. (m.p.a.), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)

So you contend that people in the states only started talking about Dizzee and grime in 2005-6 after PFork started their grime/dubstep column, but a full year+ after Matador had released his debut record, Dizzee had the toured the US (at least once), and even after VICE Magazine had released Run The Road? Maybe the people you hang around with stateside are just slow on the uptake.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:29 (nineteen years ago)

I'll say it again - the fact that Pitchfork is your first (only?) point of reference says a lot, your posts so far have all been about you

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:45 (nineteen years ago)

i am profoundly grateful i have never heard anyone in real life say the word 'pitchfork'

not even when you were living in Somerset? ;)

Konal Doddz (blueski), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 15:33 (nineteen years ago)

i never talked to somerset people! i couldn't understand their accent.

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 15:40 (nineteen years ago)

@ Alex in SF-- yes the month in columns are the only bit of Pitchfork worth reading in depth (the least irritating/indie-smug). I think Dubstep is not going to be led out by albums- its dance music --- so its hype around clubs like DMZ being in Timeout as their top club etc...

gekoppel (Gekoppel), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 16:05 (nineteen years ago)

reviews by jess, dominique, tim f, philip s, mark r, etc >>>> month in dubstep

JABBA JABBA!! NIB NIB!! (vahid), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 21:16 (nineteen years ago)

even nick sylvester >> month in dubstep

JABBA JABBA!! NIB NIB!! (vahid), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 21:17 (nineteen years ago)

I meant the monthly columns in general (not the dubstep/grime on in particular although it's better than you give it credit for) were the best things on PFork. I am bummed that Jess stopped doing his though. I don't generally care much about reviews though.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 21:20 (nineteen years ago)

what's better Jabba Jabb or Nib Nib?

martin (martin), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 21:45 (nineteen years ago)

"They have created it, in other words, as a watchword for hipsters, much like they've done with "electroclash," "dancepunk," and "freakfolk.""

I like the notion that none of these would have happened but for Pitchfork.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 22:08 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah clearly no one was comparing or debating the merits of grime vs. dubstep before Pitchfork came around either.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 22:23 (nineteen years ago)

Also love the liberal use of scarequotes. What genres do people who hate all fads consider to be legitimate?

Or should we talk about "rock", "jazz" and "classical"?

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 19 July 2006 22:27 (nineteen years ago)

this MPA guy is making me look even worse than i already do (hes also making me look better in the process). where the fuck in the world is everyone in the world rocking dizzee in TWO THOUSAND AND SIX?!?!?! boy in da corner was years ago and that was when he was blowing up! no one cares about dizzees shitty new flow or his shitty new songs like g-e-t-t-o. the guy is DONE (apart from to RHCP fans). hes also a wasteman for still not releasing anything by newham gens.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 20 July 2006 11:26 (nineteen years ago)

MPA--- wtf? This lingo was not invented by pitchfork. They are usually a good 6-12 months behind the bleeding edge of any new scene, including the ones you describe... What makes them truly "hipster" (gotta love them scare quotes, but if any word needed 'em its the "h" word, surely?) is this trailing behind, never supporting something unless it was already proven to be edging into fashionable status already (which is fair enough, I mean thy are a big indie-brand now, yes? They have their advertisers to think of blah blah blah)--- the naming process was conducted between the grime producers and the blogeratti over the course of maybe 2 years, check the backpages of Blissblog and you can observe its emergence. Pitchfork had precisely zero role in this...

I guess what you were driving at is that dork-forkmedia popularises these things but only as a disposable fad, a mere fashionable fancy as expendable as a nappy, with its future obsolescence built in from the very start, and they do this through the style of their coverage? I think this is true, but this is also the case for all non-specialist music media, isn't it?

gekoppel (Gekoppel), Thursday, 20 July 2006 19:59 (nineteen years ago)

neat little photo essay about london's inner-city young grime hopefuls:

http://magnuminmotion.com/essay_grime/

nicky lo-fi (nicky lo-fi), Friday, 21 July 2006 04:33 (nineteen years ago)

mwahaah@this entire thread. this is a wind up, surely.

tigertiger (tigertiger), Friday, 21 July 2006 12:46 (nineteen years ago)

its no fad. It might be for the beard stroking hipsters in NY (or whatever) but in East LDN?

depends what your timeline is. everything is a fad eventually.

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Friday, 21 July 2006 13:03 (nineteen years ago)

The shortest fads are the best. Christianity proves this.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Friday, 21 July 2006 13:07 (nineteen years ago)

This thread both makes me want to laugh out loud and bang my head against the table in frustration at once.

Am I right in thinking that dubstep is actually bigger than grime now, as far as popularity of raves and number of people immersed in the scene goes? Grime strikes me as a scene on the wane in a way in which dubstep doesn't (yet).

Or is it possible that dubstep nights are less intimidating to the casual punter? If anything this was as bigger factor hindering grime's crossover potential as the inaccessibility of the music.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 21 July 2006 13:24 (nineteen years ago)

"btw, konal, i think the phrase youre looking for in place of 'fidgety' is 'wracked with tension, that fine line between restraint and release, which not entirely coincidentally, mirrors the behavioural traits of the of the majority of those living in the gut of ken livingstons london"

this thread is masterful.

tigertiger (tigertiger), Friday, 21 July 2006 13:41 (nineteen years ago)

A lot of people seem to think that dubstep is boring. These people should check the clip below: Chef vs Benga at the last DMZ. The mix plays 4 bars of Mud vs 4 bars of Tapped ... I believe the term is "heavy". Or "big". Whatever. It's certainly not "boring".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkFASlncdic

Duncan Wood (tiss), Monday, 31 July 2006 10:13 (nineteen years ago)

Anyone heard Skream Feat. JME-Tapped (Vocal)?

Sef (Sef), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:40 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, I don't like the vocal much though the beats, as usual, are sick.

The premise of this thread is to me a little misguided and many of the posts are the anti-OTM. Dubstep and Grime are slightly apples and oranges, though they obviously share similar roots you can say that about lots of things. Happy hardcore and prog-house can be traced back to common sources and you don't see people TSing them, and rightly so. The stress on the idea of darkness and tension in dubstep also irks me somewhat, I went to see Skream on Saturday and there was the darkness at times, but also the light lilting two-step and the complete stompers. It may be half-time but the wobbling-bass keeps you skanking liberally.

jimnaseum - (jimnaseum), Monday, 31 July 2006 23:23 (nineteen years ago)

The stress on the idea of darkness and tension in dubstep also irks me somewhat
I should clarify this, I mean in peoples posts about dubstep in internet land and in reviews rather than the darkness in the music, I can listen to Lightning by Skream all day.

jimnaseum - music to make you staga (jimnaseum), Monday, 31 July 2006 23:25 (nineteen years ago)

There is darkness and tension in dubstep- but its not rhythmical tension like you get in the best angular grime (which appears to have disappeared of late in favour of a more straigtforwardly Crunkish sound)-- its the tension of never really climaxing, the darkness of a lot of space and sometimes pulverising bass mass. But Skream for the most part is proper goodtime vibes party on down music, fun, skanked up and cheeky-chappyish. His stuff is pretty melodic (lots of chord patterns) cheap and cheerful fruity production and regular off beat reggaefied syncopation. You smile when you dance to Skream, no skrewfaces...

gekoppel (Gekoppel), Monday, 31 July 2006 23:30 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, that's true but he also touches all the basses (boom boom) with his sets. They are loaded with his productions but he has Loefah, Mala, Benga etc. in his sets. Plenty of what one of my good pals joking refers to as "heroin-step", one snare per bar fare and yet it never feels plodding (or too plodding rather, nothing wrong with a bit).

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Monday, 31 July 2006 23:40 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

http://tracksuitceo.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/ninja-versus-pirate.png?w=251&h=129

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 17 April 2008 23:55 (eighteen years ago)

This looks a LOT better than any of Boxes O' Dub:

Steppas’ Delight: Dubstep present to Future
Label: Soul Jazz

In the early 2000s Dubstep was a marginal music made by a handful of young producers in the concrete-coated suburbs of South-West London. Using free PC software like Fruity Loops or PlayStation’s music-making software Music 2000 and making their own left-field versions of dark garage records by producers like El-B, Benny Ill and Wookie which themselves were experiments into the outskirts of what was then the shiny, champagne-bubblin’ 2step garage scene.

Fast forward eight years and Dubstep is easily the most vibrant scene in the UK with many of the original Dubstep artists now the most in-demand producers, remixers, DJs and label-owners in the UK today. Steppas’ Delight traces the musical journey of Dubstep from these small beginnings to the current new wave of young artists and producers on the scene today. This release is both a snapshot of the present and future and an essential guide to Dubstep, and telling the story of the music – the artists, labels, clubs, radio stations, cutting houses and more.

This release is a continuation of Soul Jazz Records’ prolific Dubstep releases such as the Box of Dub albums as well as singles from the likes of Digital Mystikz, Skream, Ramadanman, Cotti, Kode9, Ladybug, Warrior Queen and many more. Steppas’ Delight is made up of important tracks from the origination of the scene, current new wave producers and exclusive unreleased cuts. Essential!

CD1
01 Kode 9 - Samurai 9
02 Benga - Evolution
03 Search and Destroy - Candy Floss (Loefah Mix)
04 Plastician featuring Skepta - Intensive Snare
05 Uncle Sam - Round The World Girls (Tes La Rok Mix)
06 The Bug and Warrior Queen - Poison Dart
07 Goth Trad - Genesis
08 Seventeen Evergreen - Ensonique (Bi-Polar Man Mix)
09 Martyn - Broken
10 Shackleton - Blood On My Hands
CD2
01 TRG - Broken Heart
02 Joker - Gullybrook Lane (Instrumental)
03 Quest - Hardfood
04 Ikonika - Please
05 Silkie - Dam 4
06 Geiom featuring Marita - Reminissin
07 Shonx - Canton
08 Gatekeeper featuring Grilza - Shade Darker
09 Peverelist - Roll With The Punches

Alex in SF, Friday, 18 April 2008 21:51 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.podcastingnews.com/articles/images/blogger_podcast/blogger_podcast_05.gif

banriquit, Friday, 18 April 2008 22:39 (eighteen years ago)

?

Alex in SF, Friday, 18 April 2008 23:46 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.