― Jeff W, Tuesday, 26 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― stirmonster, Tuesday, 26 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― gareth, Tuesday, 26 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― M Matos, Tuesday, 26 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Omar, Tuesday, 26 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Dr. C, Tuesday, 26 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Alan Trewartha, Tuesday, 26 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Yes, it is electro, I guess, but the sound seems darker, drier, more staccato than what I remember of the 80s version (admittedly, not much).
― jk, Tuesday, 26 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I share Jeff's hesitation with the word "electro", especially when it then becomes difficult to distinguish it from the nu-electro boom of a few years ago (perpetrated by a lot of IDM artists, and ultimately making it difficult to plain rule out something like, say, Autechre). It's like there's two hitherto intertwined strands of electro that are being teased apart. In this new version, not only is the idea of cold futurism embodied by personalities rather than solely in the music (cf. the cold facelessness of Jedi Knights and their compatriots), but there's less spindly programmed beats and a *lot* more stomping kickdrums - I think this is a good thing. It makes the music at once more compulsive and druggy (in a coke sense, not an e sense) and a lot more pop.
Spirtually if not necessarily sonically the largely unmentioned influence for a lot of this stuff seems to be mid-to-late eighties industrial like Front 242 and Neitser Ebb (it's very easy, for example, to imagine this as being the soundtrack music for the film 'The Living End' instead of the industrial-pop that was used). I may or may not expand on this at a later point.
― Tim, Tuesday, 26 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Andy K, Tuesday, 26 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ronan, Tuesday, 26 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 26 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Resusitation by Adult. On Ersatz Audio Auto-Biography by Le Car on Ersatz Audio V/A From Beyond on Interdimensional Transmissions Music Compacte on Viewlexx Records The Man From Pack by I-F Anything of Psi49net Records
Call the good stuff electro, call the rest of the shit Electro-pop.
Electro pop is electronic music for people who are embarrassed to admit that they were sweater rockers a year ago and who want you top think they are cool because they dig this "electronic" thing, but do not actually get pure electronic music. Adult. was making electro with vocals 7 years ago, and it did not become cool until NYC bit it and said it is cool last year. Between Kitbuilders and Adult. nobody else was making vocal electro in the mid-90's. Leave it to NYC to bite Detroit, make arse candy electro records, and rake in the cash.
If you are going to buy into this trend, buy Ersatz Audio records, as they are the best outfit in this genre and they deserve your business.
― mt, Wednesday, 27 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Um, define "pure electronic music" please, mt. Also, if you believe it's so much better than (to use your term) electro-pop, you could at least say why, give us something to work with.
― Jeff W, Wednesday, 27 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
The kind of pure electronic music that I am talking about is a music that has despensed with a lyrical narrative and a traditional song structure. It is a music that comes from 20th century academic electronic music, 60-70 minimalism, and late 70's conceptual disco. It is not about the song, it is about the track. It is not verse- chorus-verse-brige...
The best example I can give is when Laddio Boloko, Panasonic, and Trans Am played a show in Detroit together a few years ago. I really liked Laddio Boloko, they had rock instrumentation but their dummer was leading the group, and they had really weird song structures. They were a bit like Can in the throws of Amphetine psychosis(but in a good way). :) The crowd kinda got them because they could recognize the instrumentation and it fit in with their sense of what a rock show was "supposed" to look like.
The Panasonic goes on and it is two Finn's standing over an MPC and a few processors. The play weird noisy electro stuff, definitely extreme sounds that are not tied to the conventional. It is 808 percussion and extreme noise. The crowd got so loud that you could actually hear their talking over the house P.A. I think there were about 10 people in the crowd actually listening, and about 7 of them were dance music people that I had seen at clubs. Panasonic was brilliant, really interesting and fresh.
Then Trans-Am comes out and plays this lame-ass faux sleazy 70's electronic rock music and the crowd eats it up. It has nothing to do with the music itself, it just fits into the expectations of the crowd and is therefore "good". They look rock, the sounds kinda rock, and they are not challenging anything or expecting their audience to accomodate their vison of music.
The point that I am trying to make is that these new electro-pop bands are just cashing in on other peoples ideas. It is this lame candy electro that doesn't really funk or groove; but the bands look good, they have pop song structures, and most importantly, they have lyrics so that it is easy for people to "get it". Fisherspooner and Miss Kittin are fucking awful. They write shitty songs with the current trendy sounds, and are more image than music. The people who are buying into this stuff are just tourists, they will move on to the next trend when this one is done. They think they want something new because it is another influence to make themselves appear cool, but they do not actually want to take the leap into truly deep electronic music. "We will use your pallette of sounds and make them sound lame and stupid from over-use and commericalization, but we will not actually acknowledge or understand any of your real musical innovations or values."
Adult. might have a look, but flat out, Adam Miller writes damn good songs with great beats. If you are going to buy into electro, make sure it has raw funk. They might be mixing in a strong post-punk influence, but their tracks still groove. Miss Kittin and Fishspooner are not funky.
i don't like fischerspooner (what little i've heard) and i do like adult... but i don't think they're doing anything that's fundamentally different. adult is just more successful at the same game. 'hand to phone' is a pop song... you can't call it 'pure electronic music' just because you like it better!
― minna, Wednesday, 27 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Mike isn't this essentially what Bambataa and Arthur Baker said to Kraftwerk? "Lame and stupid" in this case being a roundabout way of saying "fun and interesting".
I'm not sure what "values" you'd ascribe to electro - I'm sure you wouldn't do this but it almost sounds like you're confusing/conflating it with detroit techno (a big mistake, I'm sure you'd agree, as it totally denies the *other* legacy of electro: miami bass, freestyle, booty techno etc.)
Bottom line is electro-pop existed then - look no further than New Order - and there's no reason for it not to exist now. If anything I found the former nu-electro boom - with its self-conscious links to the IDM scene - to be as much if not more revisionist than this current euro-trash reincarnation. And finally - do you really think that it's so easy to equate songfulness with meaningless commercialism and anti-songfulness with "deep electronic music"? By that logic progressive house is the most advanced *and* authentic dance music around.
― Tim, Thursday, 28 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 5 October 2002 22:15 (twenty-three years ago)