I've always admired d.j. culture and the art of sampling, but this conversation troubled me. I believe that a good d.j. mix should be about recontextualising music. A talented d.j. has the ability to blend together records in new and unusual ways. The person I spoke to seemed more interested in decontextualisation and the reduction of meaning. Yes, many Gainsbourg records have great breakbeats on them, but they also have many other wonderful qualities too.
Has anyone ever encountered d.j.s who have totally forgotten about the expressive nature of music?
― Mark Dixon, Wednesday, 27 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 27 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I got the impression that every record he played in his d.j. set was chosen purely for its drum sound. His approach to music seemed very autistic. He also valued the obscurity of a record instead of praising its artistic qualities.
― Tracer hand, Wednesday, 27 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
you're not really going to understand music if all you know about it is the heavy-sounding drum has to line up with the heavy-sounding drum on the other record and then you move the little switch from left to right, put on another record, and then you get lots of cocaine and cheap sex.
i'm not really talking about the scratch dj (which i see as a percussionist, really) ... they're fine by me.
― fields of salmon, Wednesday, 27 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Wednesday, 27 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I may be incorrect, but I think that most SERIOUSLY AVID collectors of this sort don't really qualify as DJ's anyway. They're record collectors and have all the nerdy quirks as such. I'm not so sure the examples of records given are all that obscure. I consider Shadow to be the digger's digger. I'm sure he's got so much shit that nobody else has ever heard of. Maybe it's just his mystique, though.
I've also pretty much given up this kind of record buying. I don't really have that much interest in records that are only good for 30 seconds. But at the same time I can appreciate the fact that some people are into it. It's like building a sampling library, and the truth is that there are lots of records that you will only see once in your life. Lots you will never see. And if you let that start bothering you, you can end up being a total junkie, snatching up anything in front of your face.
― Ron, Wednesday, 27 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
This sort of behaviorist/reductionist model could easily be applied to rock, too. I don't see any use in creating some double-standard of evaluation.
― Clarke B., Wednesday, 27 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
moving a crossfader from left to right is still moving a crossfader from left to right.
― fields of salmon, Thursday, 28 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
And I'd agree with most of the above. It fucks your perceptions of music completely. I would put on absolutely dismal records and rave about them saying things like "yeah, the melody and the vocal are awful, but I love the percussion" or "that bit right there (rewind to 2 second snippet repeatedly) is really good". Which does display very little understanding of the fact that any music thrives from the combination of elements and not the elements themselves.
I think that this is why beat-digging isn't really djing - no one plays a live set of those records, so they don't get to hear them in the combination of the mix, or the context of the set. That one bar, or even one kick-drum sound exist in isolation.
Euch.
It's a virus, I think, and should not be encouraged.
― jacob, Thursday, 28 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 28 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
sure all that stuff has been done to death, but by now how can you claim that moving a crossfader from left to right hasn't either? how many boring trance djs does the world need?
― Tracer Hand, Saturday, 30 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Josh, Saturday, 30 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)